Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Systematic Investigation of Commonsense Knowledge in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.00607 v3 pith:M77ENNZJ submitted 2021-10-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords commonsenseknowledgemodelsfew-shotlargeperformanceevaluationlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) trained on large amounts of data have shown impressive performance on many NLP tasks under the zero-shot and few-shot setup. Here we aim to better understand the extent to which such models learn commonsense knowledge -- a critical component of many NLP applications. We conduct a systematic and rigorous zero-shot and few-shot commonsense evaluation of large pre-trained LMs, where we: (i) carefully control for the LMs' ability to exploit potential surface cues and annotation artefacts, and (ii) account for variations in performance that arise from factors that are not related to commonsense knowledge. Our findings highlight the limitations of pre-trained LMs in acquiring commonsense knowledge without task-specific supervision; furthermore, using larger models or few-shot evaluation are insufficient to achieve human-level commonsense performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Disentangling Exploration of Large Language Models by Optimal Exploitation

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Exploration by LLM agents can be measured separately from exploitation using an optimal exploitation oracle, and most models explore poorly, with exploration performance correlated to reasoning ability.

Pith tools