Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Review of the Challenges with Massive Web-mined Corpora Used in Large Language Models Pre-Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07630 v1 pith:MCVVB6ED submitted 2024-07-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords challengescorporainformationlanguagemodelsreviewweb-minedethically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This article presents a comprehensive review of the challenges associated with using massive web-mined corpora for the pre-training of large language models (LLMs). This review identifies key challenges in this domain, including challenges such as noise (irrelevant or misleading information), duplication of content, the presence of low-quality or incorrect information, biases, and the inclusion of sensitive or personal information in web-mined corpora. Addressing these issues is crucial for the development of accurate, reliable, and ethically responsible language models. Through an examination of current methodologies for data cleaning, pre-processing, bias detection and mitigation, we highlight the gaps in existing approaches and suggest directions for future research. Our discussion aims to catalyze advancements in developing more sophisticated and ethically responsible LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Automating Categorization of Scientific Texts

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    With few-shot prompting, Llama 3.1 classifies paper titles and abstracts into five ORKG top-level fields at 0.82 accuracy, about 0.08 above a BERT baseline.

Pith tools