The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2111.12726 · v2 · pith:MGOZWP4N · submitted 2021-11-24 · astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

What can CMB observations tell us about the neutrino distribution function?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:MGOZWP4Nrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords neutrinomathrmdistributionconstraindataexperimentsfunctionmass
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) observations have been used extensively to constrain key properties of neutrinos, such as their mass. However, these inferences are typically dependent on assumptions about the cosmological model, and in particular upon the distribution function of neutrinos in the early Universe. In this paper, we aim to assess the full extent to which CMB experiments are sensitive to the shape of the neutrino distribution. We demonstrate that Planck and CMB-S4-like experiments have no prospects for detecting particular features in the distribution function. Consequently, we take a general approach and marginalise completely over the form of the neutrino distribution to derive constraints on the relativistic and non-relativistic neutrino energy densities, characterised by $N_\mathrm{eff} = 3.0 \pm 0.4$ and $\rho_{\nu,0}^{\rm NR} < 14 \, \mathrm{eV}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ at 95% CL, respectively. The fact that these are the only neutrino properties that CMB data can constrain has important implications for neutrino mass limits from cosmology. Specifically, in contrast to the $\Lambda$CDM case where CMB and BAO data tightly constrain the sum of neutrinos masses to be $\sum m_\nu < 0.12 \, \mathrm{eV}$, we explicitly show that neutrino masses as large as $\sum m_\nu \sim 3 \, \mathrm{eV}$ are perfectly consistent with this data. Importantly, for this to be the case, the neutrino number density should be suitably small such that the bound on $\rho_{\nu,0}^\mathrm{NR} = \sum m_\nu n_{\nu,0}$ is still satisfied. We conclude by giving an outlook on the opportunities that may arise from other complementary experimental probes, such as galaxy surveys, neutrino mass experiments and facilities designed to directly detect the cosmic neutrino background.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing the small-scale primordial power spectrum via relic neutrinos and acoustic reheating

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dissipation of small-scale primordial perturbations after neutrino decoupling cools relic neutrinos and reduces their abundance, enabling PTOLEMY to constrain the primordial curvature power spectrum to O(0.1) on scale...

  2. Probing the neutrino chemical potential with cosmological observations

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Updated bounds on constant and redshift-dependent neutrino degeneracy parameters are derived from Planck+SPT+ACT CMB, DESI BAO, and BBN data, with a reported 95% CL preference for non-zero positive ξ_νe at BBN in the ...