Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 77 references

Pressure anisotropy inside quark stars measurably shifts f-mode oscillation frequencies and tidal deformability, and positive anisotropy moves predictions closer to the GW170817 tidal constraints.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 16:36 UTC pith:MI724Z4Q

load-bearing objection Solid numerical study with a genuinely new anisotropic perturbation system, but the new equations deserve a fresh algebraic check and the submission metadata needs cleaning up. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.12438 v3 pith:MI724Z4Q submitted 2025-09-15 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Examining the influence of anisotropy on the fundamental mode of nonradial oscillation in neutron stars on a complete general relativistic scheme

Jos\'e D. V. Arba\~nil , Gabriel O. Cavalheiro , Victor B. T. Alves , Juan M. Z. Pretel , C\'esar O. V. Flores , C\'esar H. Lenzi This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE MSC 83C0583C3585A15 PACS 04.40.Dg97.60.Jd
keywords anisotropic pressuref-mode oscillationsnonradial oscillationstidal deformabilitystrange quark starsgeneral relativityGW170817MIT bag model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether direction-dependent pressure—anisotropy—that could exist inside ultra-dense stars leaves an observable imprint in gravitational-wave asteroseismology. It derives the full general-relativistic nonradial oscillation equations and the tidal deformability equations in the presence of an anisotropic fluid, then solves them for strange quark stars built from the vector MIT bag model. The central finding is that the f-mode frequency and the dimensionless tidal deformability shift coherently with the anisotropy parameter α: positive α increases mass, radius, and tidal deformability, while changing f-mode frequencies by a few percent depending on the mass range. All computed tidal deformability curves fall inside the GW170817 confidence region, and larger positive α brings predictions closest to the observed contours.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that anisotropy is not a small correction to the isotropic stellar model. For a fixed central energy density, varying α from −1 to +1 changes the star's mass by up to 49%, radius by up to 12%, compactness by up to 33%, the f-mode frequency by a few percent, and the dimensionless tidal deformability by a sizable amount. In the Λ1–Λ2 plane built for the GW170817 chirp mass, the curves shift upward with positive α, and the most positive values best match the reported 50% and 90% credibility contours. The authors conclude that measured f-mode frequencies and tidal deformabilities could bound the amount of anisotropy and help distinguish strange-quark st

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phenomenological anisotropy profile σ = α p_r (1 − 1/g11), where p_r is the radial pressure, g11 is the rr component of the metric, and α is a dimensionless constant. This quasilocal form vanishes at the center and surface, is regular throughout, and enters the modified TOV equilibrium equation, the newly derived nonradial perturbation system (Eqs. 2.17–2.22), the center regularity expansions (Appendix B), and the tidal Love-number Riccati equation through anisotropic coefficients. The argument works by inserting this σ into the full linearized Einstein equations and integrating the coupled system for a grid of central densities, then mapping f-mode frequencies

Load-bearing premise

The entire quantitative outcome depends on the adopted phenomenological anisotropy profile σ = α p_r (1 − 1/g11); a different functional form, not derived from microphysics, could change the size and even the sign of the predicted shifts in f-mode frequency and tidal deformability.

What would settle it

Compute the same f-mode and Λ curves using any alternative anisotropy profile that is regular and vanishes at center and surface—for instance σ = α ρ (1 − p_r/p_c) or a shear-viscosity-motivated form—and check whether the sign and magnitude of the Λ shift and the f-mode frequency shift at fixed mass persist. If the shifts flip sign or drop below numerical error, then the paper's central claim is specific to its chosen profile rather than to anisotropy generically. An observational test would be to detect an f-mode signal from a galactic supernova with frequency near 2 kHz and damping time near

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If anisotropy is present with α > 0, strange quark stars can support larger maximum masses and radii, easing tension with observed massive pulsar constraints.
  • f-mode frequencies in the roughly 2 kHz band shift by about 1–3% for fixed central density, a shift that future third-generation detectors could resolve for a galactic source.
  • Positive α raises the tidal deformability at fixed mass, moving the Λ(M) curve into the upper part of the GW170817 band, while all models considered remain consistent with the event's Λ1.4 constraint.
  • The f-mode frequency and Λ are inversely correlated: larger tidal deformability corresponds to lower f-mode frequency, independent of α in the computed range.
  • The damping time and the minimum detectable gravitational-wave energy depend on α, so a measured f-mode signal from a galactic supernova could bound α once mass and radius are known.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same calculation could be rerun with a microphysically motivated anisotropy—for example, one derived from magnetic stress or shear viscosity—to test whether the sign and magnitude of the Λ and f-mode shifts survive; the paper's quantitative results are tied to the specific σ profile.
  • Because the derived perturbation equations differ from those in earlier anisotropic studies, a direct numerical cross-check using the isotropic limit (α = 0) and an independent code would sharpen confidence in the quoted few-percent frequency shifts.
  • If future detectors measure both the f-mode frequency and the tidal deformability of the same binary component, the combined f-frequency–Λ plane could serve as a diagnostic to disentangle anisotropy effects from equation-of-state effects, since positive anisotropy partially mimics a stiffer hadronic equation of state.
  • The predicted minimum detectable energy for galactic sources (about 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻¹⁰ solar masses) suggests that a single nearby core-collapse supernova event could already test the model's α dependence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the effect of pressure anisotropy on the f-mode nonradial oscillations and tidal deformability of strange quark stars in full general relativity. The authors adopt the vector MIT bag model EOS (B=81.1 MeV/fm³, G_V=0.1 fm²) and the quasilocal anisotropy profile σ=αp_r(1−1/g_11). They derive a set of nonradial perturbation equations (2.17)–(2.22) that incorporate the anisotropic factor, perform a shooting-matching calculation with complex eigenfrequencies, and compute f-mode frequencies, damping times, detectability energies for aLIGO/ET, and the dimensionless tidal deformability Λ. They report that the f-mode frequency and Λ are noticeably affected by anisotropy: at fixed central densities the f-mode frequency decreases with increasing α while mass and radius increase, and Λ increases for α>0 and decreases for α<0. The predicted Λ1–Λ2 curves are compared with GW170817; the paper states that all results fall within the LVC bounds and that larger positive α values bring the curves closer to the confidence contours.

Significance. If the derived equations are correct, the paper provides a complete-GR treatment of f-modes in anisotropic strange stars, going beyond Cowling-approximation studies, and supplies explicit central regularity conditions (Appendix B) that reduce to known isotropic limits. The EOS parameters are taken from prior literature and α is scanned rather than fitted, so the GW170817 comparison is an a posteriori consistency check rather than a calibration. The predictions—the sign and magnitude of the α-dependence of f-mode frequencies, damping times, and Λ1–Λ2 curves—are falsifiable and would be of interest to the asteroseismology and gravitational-wave community. However, the significance is conditional: the new perturbation equations are not validated against any independent derivation or numerical benchmark, and all f-mode results flow from them. The paper also does not derive the anisotropy profile from microphysics, which limits the generality of its conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eqs. (2.17)–(2.22)] The manuscript states (Introduction and §2.2) that the anisotropic perturbation equations and regularity conditions 'differ from the respective equations derived in Ref. [33] in all terms where the anisotropic factor appears.' No independent derivation, algebraic check, or numerical benchmark is provided; the only check is the symbolic isotropic reduction to Ref. [41]. Since every f-mode frequency, damping time, and detectability result in §§4.2–4.3 is obtained by integrating (2.17)–(2.22), an algebraic error in the anisotropic terms would change the magnitude or sign of the reported α-dependence. Please add (i) a numerical validation for α=0 against published isotropic f-mode frequencies for a known EOS, and (ii) a reconciliation with Ref. [33], showing either that the difference is notational or profile-induced, or which derivation is correct.
  2. [Section 4.2, Table 1 and Fig. 2] The central qualitative claim—'the f-modes increase (or decrease) as α increases (or decreases)' for specific mass ranges—is not quantified. Table 1 shows that at fixed central density (ρc=400 and 600 MeV/fm³), α from −1 to +1 increases M by 35–49% while f decreases by 1.4–3.2%; Fig. 2 (left) indicates that curves cross as a function of M, so the sign of the effect at fixed mass is not evident from the data. To make the claim falsifiable, give f and ω_f√(R³/M) at fixed M (e.g., 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 M⊙) versus α, and specify the mass intervals where the ordering reverses.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.6)] All results are computed for the single phenomenological profile σ=αp_r(1−1/g_11). The paper acknowledges in §5 that the oscillation equations depend on this profile, but the abstract and §4.2 present the f-mode and Λ responses to α as generic anisotropic effects. Because Eqs. (2.17)–(2.22) explicitly involve ∂σ/∂p_r, ∂σ/∂g_11, and ∂σ/∂ρ, an alternative anisotropy Ansatz (e.g., σ=αp_r or a shear/magnetic-field-motivated profile) can change both the size and sign of the shifts. Recommend testing at least one alternative profile, or explicitly restricting all conclusions to profile (3.6).
  4. [Section 4.4, Figs. 3–4] The abstract and §5 advertise a correlation between Λ and α and state that positive α brings values closer to the GW170817 confidence intervals, but the comparison is only visual. Please quantify the compatibility: which α values place the Λ1–Λ2 curves within the 50% and 90% contours for the adopted M1–M2 ranges, and by what measure (e.g., minimum distance in the Λ1–Λ2 plane)? As written, the 'correlation' is not tested and the conclusion is stronger than the evidence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [arXiv metadata / Abstract] The arXiv title and abstract describe 'neutron stars' with a 'piecewise polytropic interpolating scheme,' while the full text studies strange quark stars with the vector MIT bag model (Section 3.1). The metadata must be corrected to match the manuscript.
  2. [Section 4.1] The text says the shooting method adjusts Ψ_c 'if the resulting solution does not satisfy the boundary condition given in equation (2.7)'; the boundary condition is Eq. (2.10), not Eq. (2.7).
  3. [Section 4.2, Fig. 1] The color coding in the text (light yellow/orange/green bands for PSR J0740+6620, J0348+0432, J1614+2230) does not match the figure caption (purple/black/orange/gray curves for NICER bands). Please harmonize figure and text.
  4. [Full-text Abstract] Typo: 'f-frequency of oscillation' should be 'f-mode frequency of oscillation.'
  5. [Section 4.3 / Conclusions] The conclusion 'massive stars with α∼1.0 could be detected within our galaxy' is not supported by Table 2: the required energies vary only between 1.28×10⁻⁷ and 1.54×10⁻⁷ M⊙ across all α, all well below the CCSN energy budget. The detectability statement in §4.3 applies to all models, not specifically to α∼1.0.
  6. [Table 1] The percentage changes (+35%, +10%, etc.) should state explicitly that they are computed relative to the isotropic α=0 case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: f-mode and tidal results are computed from explicit integrations with literature-fixed EOS parameters, with the anisotropy parameter scanned rather than fitted and GW170817 used only as a posteriori comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—that anisotropy shifts the f-mode frequency and the dimensionless tidal deformability, and that the computed Lambda values fall within GW170817 contours—are derived by numerically integrating the stated equilibrium equations (2.5)-(2.7), the nonradial perturbation equations (2.17)-(2.22), and the tidal deformability equation (2.29). The vMIT bag model parameters B=81.1 MeV/fm^3 and G_V=0.1 fm^2 are taken from Ref. [52], not fitted to the paper's own outputs. The anisotropy parameter alpha is scanned over a range, and no quantity is adjusted to reproduce the f-mode frequencies, damping times, or tidal deformabilities. The GW170817 comparison is a consistency check after the fact, not a constraint used to set the model parameters. The anisotropic profile (3.6) is an explicit modeling assumption, acknowledged as such, not a result derived from the conclusions. The new perturbation equations are derived in the paper from the perturbed Einstein and conservation equations, with a stated reduction to the isotropic limit; the acknowledged difference from Ref. [33] is a scientific validation concern, not an indication that the results reduce by construction to the paper's inputs. Self-citations appear only for the adopted profile and standard perturbation/tidal formalism, and none is load-bearing for the quantitative conclusions. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced; the anisotropy is a fluid property encoded in the stress-energy tensor. The free parameters are the scanned anisotropy constant alpha and the two EOS parameters taken from the prior literature.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (anisotropy parameter) = -2 to 2, with displayed values -1.0, -0.5, 0, +0.5, +1.0
    Free dimensionless parameter controlling the strength of pressure anisotropy in Eq. (3.6); not fitted to data, scanned over a range.
  • Bag constant B = 81.1 MeV/fm^3
    Taken from Ref. [52]; sets the EOS of the quark star, not fitted in this work.
  • Vector coupling G_V = 0.1 fm^2
    From Ref. [52]; fixes the vector interaction strength of the vMIT bag model.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Einstein field equations and even-parity metric perturbation theory in the Regge-Wheeler gauge apply to anisotropic fluids.
    Used to derive the oscillation equations (2.17)-(2.22) and the perturbation equations in Appendix A.
  • domain assumption The stellar fluid is described by a single barotropic EOS p_r = p_r(rho) even in the presence of anisotropy.
    Used throughout, e.g., Eq. (2.20) uses d rho / d p_r; the anisotropic pressure is a separate function sigma.
  • ad hoc to paper The quasilocal anisotropic profile sigma = alpha p_r (1 - 1/g_11) is a valid representation of pressure anisotropy in strange quark stars.
    Phenomenological model from Refs. [54-56], not derived from microphysics; all quantitative results depend on this functional form.
  • domain assumption The vMIT bag model with vector coupling describes strange quark matter at the densities of interest.
    EOS chosen from Ref. [52]; B and G_V fixed to their stated values.
  • domain assumption The surface energy density discontinuity in strange stars requires the y_R correction in Eq. (2.32).
    Used to compute tidal deformability; standard for strange quark stars.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21249 in / 11143 out tokens · 111814 ms · 2026-08-04T16:36:20.347583+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The anisotropic influence on the $f$-mode frequency of oscillations and dimensionless tidal deformability of neutron stars is analyzed by employing the nonradial oscillation equations for the complete general relativity frame and tidal deformability equations, which are derived and modified from their standard form to introduce the anisotropic factor. The fluid inside the compact star obeys an equation of state constructed by matching microscopic nuclear and perturbative QCD calculations through a piecewise polytropic interpolating scheme. For the anisotropic profile, we use a local anisotropy which is regular along the whole star and vanishes both at the center and on the star's surface. We show that the \(f\)-mode oscillation frequency and dimensionless tidal deformability are noticeably affected by anisotropy. Finally, we investigate the correlation between the dimensionless tidal deformability inferred from the GW$170817$ event and the anisotropy parameter.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 47 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abbott and et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161101 [1710.05832]. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Abbott and et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Abbott and et al.,GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 241103 [1606.04855]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Abbott and et al.,Tests of General Relativity with GW150914,Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,Tests of General Relativity with GW150914,Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 221101 [1602.03841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Abbott and et al.,GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 221101 [1706.01812]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Abbott and et al.,GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 141101 [1709.09660]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Abbott and et al.,GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Astrophys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,Astrophys. J. Lett.851(2017) L35 [1711.05578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Abbott and et al.,Astrophysical Implications of the Binary Black-hole Merger GW150914, Astrophys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,Astrophysical Implications of the Binary Black-hole Merger GW150914, Astrophys. J. Lett.818(2016) L22 [1602.03846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Abbott and et al.,Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys

    B.P. Abbott and et al.,Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2017) L12 [1710.05833]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Miller and F

    A.L. Miller and F. De Lillo,Searching for continuous gravitational waves from highly deformed compact objects with decigo,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 042001

    2025

  11. [11]

    Miniutti, J.A

    G. Miniutti, J.A. Pons, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri and V. Ferrari,Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.338(2003) 389 [astro-ph/0206142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    Passamonti, M

    A. Passamonti, M. Bruni, L. Gualtieri, A. Nagar and C.F. Sopuerta,Coupling of radial and axial nonradial oscillations of compact stars: Gravitational waves from first-order differential rotation,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 084010 [gr-qc/0601001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Savonije,Non-radial oscillations of the rapidly rotating Be star HD 163868,Astro

    G.J. Savonije,Non-radial oscillations of the rapidly rotating Be star HD 163868,Astro. Astrop. 469(2007) 1057 [0705.1755]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Flores, Z.B

    C.V. Flores, Z.B. Hall and P. Jaikumar,Nonradial oscillation modes of compact stars with a crust,Phys. Rev. C96(2017) 065803 [1708.05985]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Sotani and T

    H. Sotani and T. Harada,Nonradial oscillations of quark stars,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 024019 [gr-qc/0307035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    Flores and G

    C.V. Flores and G. Lugones,Constraining color flavor locked strange stars in the gravitational wave era,Phys. Rev. C95(2017) 025808 [1702.02081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Andersson and K.D

    N. Andersson and K.D. Kokkotas,Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.299(1998) 1059 [gr-qc/9711088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari and L. Gualtieri,Gravitational wave asteroseismology reexamined,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 124015 [astro-ph/0407529]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. Tominaga and K.-I. Maeda,Density discontinuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D65(2001) 024010 [gr-qc/0108060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Flores, C.H

    C.V. Flores, C.H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, O. Lourenço and J.D.V. Arbañil,Gravitational wave asteroseismology of dark matter hadronic stars,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083021 [2402.12600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Gittins, N

    F. Gittins, N. Andersson and D.I. Jones,Modelling neutron star mountains,MNRAS500 (2020) 5570

    2020

  22. [22]

    Gittins and N

    F. Gittins and N. Andersson,Modelling neutron star mountains in relativity,MNRAS507 (2021) 116. – 21 –

    2021

  23. [23]

    Pnigouras, N

    P. Pnigouras, N. Andersson, F. Gittins and A.R. Counsell,Dynamical neutron-star tides: The signature of a mode resonance,MNRAS(2025) staf1285

    2025

  24. [24]

    Sokolov,Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liquid,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics52(1980) 575

    A.I. Sokolov,Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liquid,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics52(1980) 575

    1980

  25. [25]

    Carter and D

    B. Carter and D. Langlois,Relativistic models for superconducting-superfluid mixtures,Nucl. Phys. B531(1998) 478

    1998

  26. [26]

    Yazadjiev,Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonperturbative analytical approach,Phys

    S.S. Yazadjiev,Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonperturbative analytical approach,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 044030

    2012

  27. [27]

    Herrera and N

    L. Herrera and N. Santos,Local anisotropy in self-gravitating systems,Phys. Rep.286(1997) 53

    1997

  28. [28]

    Kumar and P

    J. Kumar and P. Bharti,Relativistic models for anisotropic compact stars: A review,New Astron. Rev.95(2022) 101662

    2022

  29. [29]

    Curi, L.B

    E.J.A. Curi, L.B. Castro, C.V. Flores and C.H. Lenzi,Non-radial oscillations and global stellar properties of anisotropic compact stars using realistic equations of state,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 527

    2022

  30. [30]

    Das and L.L

    H.C. Das and L.L. Lopes,Anisotropic strange stars in the spotlight: unveiling constraints through observational data,MNRAS525(2023) 3571

    2023

  31. [31]

    Pretel, T

    J.M.Z. Pretel, T. Tangphati, A. Banerjee and A. Pradhan,Effects of anisotropic pressure on interacting quark star structure,Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138375

    2024

  32. [32]

    Becerra, E.A

    L.M. Becerra, E.A. Becerra-Vergara and F.D. Lora-Clavijo,Realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Pressure effects,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 043025

    2024

  33. [33]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi,f-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in full general relativity,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123011 [2309.00439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi,Quasinormal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 103035 [2504.20589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Tolman,Static Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid,Physical Review55(1939) 364

    R.C. Tolman,Static Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid,Physical Review55(1939) 364

    1939

  36. [36]

    Oppenheimer and G.M

    J.R. Oppenheimer and G.M. Volkoff,On Massive Neutron Cores,Physical Review55(1939) 374

    1939

  37. [37]

    Bowers and E.P.T

    R.L. Bowers and E.P.T. Liang,Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity,Astrophys. J.188 (1974) 657

    1974

  38. [38]

    Thorne and A

    K.S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro,Non-Radial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis for L >= 2, Sept., 1967. 10.1086/149288

    doi:10.1086/149288 1967

  39. [39]

    Regge and J.A

    T. Regge and J.A. Wheeler,Stability of a Schwarzschild Singularity,Physical Review108 (1957) 1063

    1957

  40. [40]

    Lindblom and S.L

    L. Lindblom and S.L. Detweiler,The quadrupole oscillations of neutron stars.,Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.53(1983) 73

    1983

  41. [41]

    Detweiler and L

    S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom,On the nonradial pulsations of general relativistic stellar models, Astrophys. J.292(1985) 12

    1985

  42. [42]

    Doneva and S.S

    D.D. Doneva and S.S. Yazadjiev,Nonradial oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in the Cowling approximation,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 124023 [1203.3963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Arbañil, C.V

    J.D.V. Arbañil, C.V. Flores, C.H. Lenzi and J.M.Z. Pretel,Fluid pulsation modes and tidal deformability of anisotropic strange stars in light of the GW170817 event,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 124016 [2305.13468]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Zerilli,Effective Potential for Even-Parity Regge-Wheeler Gravitational Perturbation Equations,Phys

    F.J. Zerilli,Effective Potential for Even-Parity Regge-Wheeler Gravitational Perturbation Equations,Phys. Rev. Lett.24(1970) 737

    1970

  45. [46]

    Fackerell,Solutions of Zerilli’s Equation for Even-Parity Gravitational Perturbations, Astrophys

    E.D. Fackerell,Solutions of Zerilli’s Equation for Even-Parity Gravitational Perturbations, Astrophys. J.166(1971) 197

    1971

  46. [47]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. Detweiler,The Quasi-Normal Modes of the Schwarzschild Black Hole, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A344(1975) 441

    1975

  47. [48]

    Q. Wang, C. Shi and H.S. Zong,Nonstrange quark stars from an njl model with proper-time regularization,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 123003

    2019

  48. [49]

    C.M. Li, S.Y. Zuo, Y. Yan, Y.P. Zhao, F. Wang, Y.F. Huang et al.,Strange quark stars within proper time regularized (2+1)-flavor njl model,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063023 [1912.05093]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [50]

    E.P. Zhou, X. Zhou and A. Li,Constraints on interquark interaction parameters with gw170817 in a binary strange star scenario,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 083015 [1711.04312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [51]

    Lourenço, C.H

    O. Lourenço, C.H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, E.J. Ferrer, V.d.l. Incera, L. Paulucci et al.,Tidal deformability of strange stars and the gw170817 event,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 103010 [2104.07825]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [52]

    Lopes, C

    L.L. Lopes, C. Biesdorf and D.P. Menezes,Modified MIT bag Models—part I: Thermodynamic consistency, stability windows and symmetry group,Phys. Scr.96(2021) 065303 [2005.13136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [53]

    Lopes, C

    L.L. Lopes, C. Biesdorf and D.P. Menezes,Hypermassive quark cores,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.512(2022) 5110 [2111.13732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [54]

    Horvat, S

    D. Horvat, S. Ilijić and A. Marunović,Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with a quasi-local equation of state,Classical and Quantum Gravity28(2011) 025009 [1010.0878]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  54. [55]

    Arbañil and G

    J.D.V. Arbañil and G. Panotopoulos,Tidal deformability and radial oscillations of anisotropic polytropic spheres,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024008 [2112.09729]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [56]

    Arbañil and M

    J.D.V. Arbañil and M. Malheiro,Radial stability of anisotropic strange quark stars,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2016(2016) 012 [1607.03984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [57]

    Folomeev and V

    V. Folomeev and V. Dzhunushaliev,Magnetic fields in anisotropic relativistic stars,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 044040 [1501.06275]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [58]

    Silva, C.F.B

    H.O. Silva, C.F.B. Macedo, E. Berti and L.C.B. Crispino,Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in general relativity and scalar-tensor theory,Classical and Quantum Gravity32(2015) 145008 [1411.6286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [59]

    Pretel,Moment of inertia of slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in f(R,T) gravity, Modern Physics Letters A37(2022) 2250188 [2301.02881]

    J.M.Z. Pretel,Moment of inertia of slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in f(R,T) gravity, Modern Physics Letters A37(2022) 2250188 [2301.02881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [60]

    Lü and W.-M

    J.-L. Lü and W.-M. Suen,Determining the long living quasi-normal modes of relativistic stars, Chinese Physics B20(2011) 040401

    2011

  60. [61]

    Vásquez Flores and G

    C. Vásquez Flores and G. Lugones,Discriminating hadronic and quark stars through gravitational waves of fluid pulsation modes,Classical and Quantum Gravity31(2014) 155002 [1310.0554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [62]

    Riley and et al.,A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,Astrophys

    T.E. Riley and et al.,A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,Astrophys. J. Lett.887(2019) L21 [1912.05702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [63]

    Miller and et al.,PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter,Astrophys

    M.C. Miller and et al.,PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.887(2019) L24 [1912.05705]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [64]

    Riley and et al.,A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy,Astrophys

    T.E. Riley and et al.,A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy,Astrophys. J. Lett.918(2021) L27 [2105.06980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [65]

    Miller and et al.,The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys

    M.C. Miller and et al.,The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett.918(2021) L28 [2105.06979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [66]

    Cromartie and et al.,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astronomy4(2020) 72 [1904.06759]

    H.T. Cromartie and et al.,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astronomy4(2020) 72 [1904.06759]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  66. [67]

    Antoniadis and et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,Science340 (2013) 448 [1304.6875]

    J. Antoniadis and et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,Science340 (2013) 448 [1304.6875]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [68]

    Demorest, T

    P.B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S.M. Ransom, M.S.E. Roberts and J.W.T. Hessels,A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay,Nature467(2010) 1081 [1010.5788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [69]

    Shirke, B.K

    S. Shirke, B.K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski and J. Schaffner-Bielich,Effects of dark matter on f-mode oscillations of neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063025 [2403.18740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [70]

    Jyothilakshmi, L.J

    O.P. Jyothilakshmi, L.J. Naik, D. Sen, A. Guha and V. Sreekanth,Effects of dark boson mediated feeble interaction between dark matter (DM) and quark matter on f-mode oscillation of DM admixed quark stars,European Physical Journal C85(2025) 461 [2410.20923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Rather, K.D

    I.A. Rather, K.D. Marquez, P. Thakur and O. Lourenço,Nonradial oscillation modes in hybrid stars with hyperons and delta baryons,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023013 [2412.12002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    Powell and P.D

    J. Powell and P.D. Lasky,The dawes review 12: Gravitational-wave burst astrophysics, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia42(2025) e030

    2025

  72. [73]

    Kokkotas, T.A

    K.D. Kokkotas, T.A. Apostolatos and N. Andersson,The inverse problem for pulsating neutron stars: a ‘fingerprint analysis’ for the supranuclear equation of state,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society320(2001) 307 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/320/3/307/3793761/320-3-307.pdf]

    2001

  73. [74]

    Echeverria,Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole,Phys

    F. Echeverria,Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole,Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 3194

    1989

  74. [75]

    Abbott, R

    B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, M.R. Abernathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams et al.,Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors,Classical and Quantum Gravity 34(2017) 044001 [1607.08697]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [76]

    Abbott, R

    B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams et al.,GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 161101 [1805.11581]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [77]

    B.-L. Li, Y. Yan and J.-L. Ping,Tidal deformabilities and radii of strange quark stars,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 043002

    2021

  77. [78]

    Xu, C.-J

    J.-F. Xu, C.-J. Xia, Z.-Y. Lu, G.-X. Peng and Y.-P. Zhao,Symmetry energy of strange quark matter and tidal deformability of strange quark stars,Nuclear Science and Techniques33 (2022) 143. – 24 –

    2022