Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies

Diego M. Hofman; Gr\'egoire Mathys; Luca V. Delacr\'etaz

Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A mixed higher-form anomaly, not an order parameter, is what forces the Goldstone boson in a superfluid.

desk verdict A clean anomaly-based proof of Goldstone's theorem plus a solid hydrodynamic reformulation; the central claim holds up and the paper deserves serious peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06977 v3 pith:MJDABSJI submitted 2019-08-19 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

Luca V. Delacrétaz , Diego M. Hofman , Grégoire Mathys This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.str-el

keywords higher-formsymmetriesmixedanomaliessuperfluidhydrodynamicsGoldstonebosonJosephsonrelationBKTtransitionwindingplanesemergentsymmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Superfluidity is usually defined by spontaneous breaking of a U(1) symmetry and an order parameter. This paper argues that the essential data is instead a mixed anomaly between that U(1) and an emergent higher-form symmetry whose charge counts the winding planes of the superfluid phase. The anomaly completely fixes a mixed current correlator to have a $p^{-2}$ pole, which by the spectral representation of a two-point function means a strictly massless state---the Goldstone boson---exists, with no need to assume any operator acquires a vacuum value. The same anomaly then supplies the zeroth-order structure of superfluid hydrodynamics, replacing the Josephson relation with a constitutive relation for the higher-form current. If correct, this extends the traditional phase-classification logic to BKT transitions---the quasi-long-range-order transitions of two-dimensional superfluids---and recasts known dissipative superfluid and low-energy QED hydrodynamics in one uniform framework.

What carries the argument

The central object is the emergent $(d-2)$-form symmetry carried by the one-form current $(\star K)_\mu$, the Hodge dual of the superfluid phase gradient; its charged objects are the winding planes of the phase. The engine of the argument is the mixed anomaly $\mathrm{d}\star K = -a F$ between this higher-form symmetry and the ordinary $U(1)$ current. In the correlator proof, the machinery is the pair of Ward identities plus the spectral representation of a time-ordered two-point function, which converts the fixed pole in $\Pi^{\mu\nu}(p)$ into a delta-function spectral-density component. In the hydrodynamic construction, the same anomaly enters at zeroth order in derivatives through the entropy-current condition, fixing the anomalous terms in the constitutive relations in the same way the equilibrium-response argument fixes the cross-coupling coefficient.

What would settle it

Compute the spectral function of the mixed correlator $\langle (\star K)_\mu J_\nu \rangle$ in a system that obeys the anomalous Ward identities with $a\neq 0$, for example a compact $U(1)$ lattice model in its superfluid phase. The claim predicts a delta-function at zero mass with residue fixed by $a$; observing no such massless singularity while the anomalous Ward identity still holds would falsify the argument. In a finite-volume simulation, the lowest state coupled to both currents should scale to zero mass with the anomaly coefficient; a gap that does not vanish would contradict the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that a relativistic quantum field theory with $U(1) \times U(1)^{(d-2)}$ symmetry and the mixed anomaly $\partial_{[\mu}(\star K)_{\nu]} = -a F_{\mu\nu}$ necessarily contains a massless Goldstone boson. Lorentz invariance constrains the mixed correlator to $\Pi^{\mu\nu}(p) = f(p^2)p^\mu p^\nu + g(p^2)p^2 g^{\mu\nu}$; the two Ward identities force $f+g=0$ and $g=-a/p^2$, so $\Pi^{\mu\nu}(p) = a(p^\mu p^\nu - p^2 g^{\mu\nu})/p^2$. Its spectral density therefore has a delta-function piece at zero mass, $\rho_{KJ}(\mu^2) = a\,\delta(\mu^2)+\cdots$, proving a massless state that both currents create. The paper stresses that this is weaker and more general than spontaneous symmetry breaking, because no order parameter or charged condensate is assumed; vortices breaking the emergent higher-form symmetry give only non-singular corrections since they are gapped. The same anomaly fixes zeroth-order terms in the hydrodynamic constitutive relations---$\sigma = a\tilde{\mu}$, $\tilde{\sigma} = a\mu$, and the tension $\tau = \tilde{\mu}\tilde{\rho}$---and the resulting first-order theory reproduces the known 14 transport coefficients of dissipative superfluid hydrodynamics, while the analogous 1-form construction yields low-energy QED as a 1-form superfluid.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the higher-form symmetry really exists as an emergent low-energy symmetry, with vortex excitations gapped; if vortices were gapless, corrections to the anomalous Ward identity could be singular as $p^2\to 0$, and the massless pole would not be forced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Masslessness in abelian broken phases can be proven from the anomalous Ward identity alone, so the result covers cases where no order parameter exists, including BKT transitions in $d=2$.
Superfluid hydrodynamics becomes the hydrodynamic theory of an anomalous higher-form symmetry: the Josephson relation is a constitutive relation, putting charge, momentum, and winding-plane conservation on equal footing.
The mixed anomaly fixes terms at zeroth order in derivatives, so entropy-current conservation determines anomaly-induced transport coefficients and the tension of the winding planes.
The 1-form generalization gives the hydrodynamic theory of low-energy QED, with the massless photon as the anomaly-protected Goldstone mode.
At first order the construction reproduces the known 14 transport coefficients of dissipative superfluid hydrodynamics, now derived without assuming how the symmetry is realized.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extending the paper's logic, the same anomaly should protect the massless mode in any realization---relativistic or not---so non-relativistic and lattice models that realize the mixed anomaly are candidate order-parameter-free superfluids.
The anomaly-inflow form $S_{\rm bulk}=a\int B\wedge F$ suggests a bulk-boundary design: a gapped system in one higher dimension with that term should host a massless boundary mode, offering a concrete diagnostic for topological or synthetic materials.
If the generalized-symmetry classification is exhaustive, other transitions now called non-Landau in two-dimensional systems should become ordinary Landau transitions once all higher-form and discrete symmetries are catalogued; testing this on known lattice models is a concrete next step.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main thing you should know: this paper has a clean, load-bearing result and it holds up. The claim is that a relativistic QFT with U(1) × U(1)^(d−2) and the mixed anomaly (1.5) must contain a massless state, even without an order parameter. The derivation in Section 1.1 is a textbook-quality current-algebra argument: Lorentz invariance fixes the correlator to two tensor structures, the two Ward identities fix them completely, and the Källén–Lehmann representation forces a delta-function spectral weight. I checked the logic; there's no hidden step. The signed spectral density subtlety is handled correctly. This is genuinely new as a proof of Goldstone's theorem from anomaly data alone, and it's general enough to include BKT.

What the paper does well beyond that: it builds the hydrodynamics of the anomalous higher-form symmetry at zeroth and first order for the 0-form superfluid, and shows the entropy-current construction fixes the anomaly terms at zeroth order, which is a nice simplification relative to Son–Surowka. The results map onto Bhattacharya–Bhattacharyya–Minwalla and Armas–Jain; those are nontrivial consistency checks. The 1-loop calculation in Section 1.3 showing that the two currents decouple at finite temperature is a useful piece of EFT work, though it's compressed.

Soft spots, in proportion. The biggest conceptual caveat is stated by the authors themselves: the U(1)^(d−2) is emergent, and the pole is protected only if vortices are gapped. That's the standard superfluid-phase assumption, and they flag it, but they don't quantify how corrections from finite vortex density or proximity to the BKT transition could soften the pole. For the central proof as a statement about a QFT with exact anomalous symmetry, it's fine; for the claim about real superfluids, it's an assumption to keep in mind. Minor: the 1-form superfluid hydrodynamics is only zeroth order; first-order corrections are deferred to [37]. Minor: Section 1.3's thermal calculation could use a few more intermediate steps, though the result looks right.

Citation pattern: solid. They cite the relevant generalized-symmetry and superfluid-hydrodynamics literature, and the self-citations are to their own prior work on WZ terms and photonization, which is appropriate. No red flags.

Who should read this: anyone working on generalized symmetries, superfluid EFT, or higher-form hydrodynamics. It's a theory paper with an exact result, a clean construction, and explicit matches to previous work. It deserves a serious referee, and I'd expect it to pass with minor revisions. I'd take it to the reading group and would cite it if I work in that area.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the existence of a massless Goldstone boson in a relativistic QFT with a U(1) × U(1)^(d−2) symmetry and mixed anomaly (1.5) follows directly from the anomalous Ward identities, without assuming an order parameter. Using Lorentz invariance and the conservation of the 0-form current, the mixed correlator is fixed to the pole form (1.9); comparison with the Källén–Lehmann representation forces a δ-function spectral weight. The authors then recast superfluid hydrodynamics as the hydrodynamics of this anomalous higher-form symmetry, deriving zeroth- and first-order constitutive relations for relativistic 0-form superfluids and constructing the analogous 1-form superfluid (low-energy QED) theory. They emphasize that the formulation generalizes the Landau paradigm to BKT-type transitions and that the Josephson relation is replaced by the higher-form current constitutive relation.

Significance. The central conceptual claim is significant: if the proof in Section 1.1 is correct, it provides an alternative to the usual spontaneous-symmetry-breaking characterization of gapless phases, with the anomaly as the more fundamental ingredient. The hydrodynamic constructions are a useful reformulation and are checked against existing results [32,33,34,37], with the transport coefficient count and anomalous transport terms matching. Among the strengths: the derivation of the pole from the two Ward identities is clean and self-contained; the anomaly coefficient is fixed by flux quantization and not fitted; the finite-temperature current-decoupling calculation in Section 1.3 independently supports the two-vector hydrodynamic description. The paper is likely to be of interest to both formal high-energy and condensed-matter audiences.

minor comments (4)

[4.1, Eq. (4.22)] Equation (4.22) contains a typo: the expression for ρ× should read ρ×=(µ̃⊥ρ̃∥−µ̃∥ρ̃⊥)/µ as in Eq. (4.18); the current text is missing a tilde on ρ∥ and the parentheses around the numerator.
[1.1, Eqs. (1.9)–(1.12)] The step from the correlator form (1.9) to the delta-function spectral weight (1.12) implicitly assumes that the Källén–Lehmann spectral density is a (possibly signed) measure; stating this explicitly would make the argument fully rigorous.
[3.2, after Eq. (3.29)] The statement 'This completely agrees with [33]' would be easier to verify if the authors pointed to the corresponding equation or table in Ref. [33].
[4.1, Eqs. (4.15)–(4.22)] The thermodynamic relations and the subsequent expressions for ρ× would be clearer if the parentheses were displayed consistently and if the stray double comma after the first expression in Eq. (4.21) were removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Goldstone-from-anomaly proof and the hydrodynamic derivations are self-contained.

full rationale

The central derivation in Section 1.1 is self-contained: it assumes the mixed-anomaly Ward identities (1.5) and, using only Lorentz covariance and the two Ward identities, fixes the mixed correlator to Π^{μν}=a(p^μ p^ν−p^2 g^{μν})/p^2 (1.9); the Källén–Lehmann representation (1.10) then forces a δ(μ^2) spectral weight. No parameter is fitted and no massless state is assumed: the pole follows from the anomaly. The hydrodynamic constructions in Sections 2–4 are likewise built from the stated symmetry, anomaly, and entropy-current axioms, and the agreement with Refs. [32–34,37] is an external consistency check rather than an input. The self-citations that appear (e.g., the remark citing [24] for a converse statement in the conformal case, and the methodological comparison with [8]) are not load-bearing for the central claims; the thermodynamic argument used to fix τ is reproduced in Appendix A rather than imported. The only substantive assumption, that vortices are gapped so that the higher-form symmetry is emergent, is an explicit physical assumption about the phase and is not a circular step. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-chain circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on standard QFT and hydrodynamic assumptions: the emergent higher-form symmetry with its anomaly, Lorentz-invariant spectral representations, local thermodynamics, and entropy-current positivity. No parameters are fitted to data; the anomaly coefficient is fixed by charge quantization, and transport coefficients are left as arbitrary non-negative functions constrained by the second law. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The superfluid phase has an emergent (d-2)-form U(1) symmetry with current (⋆K)_mu = D_mu phi and anomalous conservation d⋆K = -a F (Eq. 1.4).
Derived from the effective action (1.1)-(1.3) but used as the starting input for the generalized Goldstone proof in Section 1.1; it encodes the physical statement that winding planes are conserved in the absence of background fields.
standard math The mixed two-point function of the two currents takes the Lorentz-covariant form (1.6) and admits a Kallen-Lehmann representation (1.10).
Standard QFT assumptions of Lorentz invariance and unitarity, invoked in Section 1.1 to convert the fixed form of the correlator into the existence of a massless state.
domain assumption The hydrodynamic system is described by local thermodynamic functions p(T, mu, tilde_mu), epsilon, rho, tilde_rho, with the Euler relation (3.10) and first law (3.11).
Standard zeroth-order hydrodynamics input used in Sections 3 and 4 to close the system and to derive the entropy current conservation conditions.
domain assumption The entropy current is conserved at zeroth order and has non-negative divergence at first order (second law of thermodynamics).
Used in Section 3.1.1 to fix the scalar functions tau, gamma, sigma, tilde_sigma, and in Section 3.2 to constrain the transport coefficient matrices.
domain assumption The fluid variables include an independent vector h_mu specifying the orientation of winding planes, orthonormal to u_mu (Eq. 3.1).
Necessary for the constitutive relations (3.3)-(3.5); the physical content is that the higher-form current direction is independent of the velocity, supported by the 1-loop thermal calculation of Section 1.3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJDABSJI

@misc{pith2026190806977,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJDABSJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06977}
}

read the original abstract

We recast superfluid hydrodynamics as the hydrodynamic theory of a system with an emergent anomalous higher-form symmetry. The higher-form charge counts the winding planes of the superfluid -- its constitutive relation replaces the Josephson relation of conventional superfluid hydrodynamics. This formulation puts all hydrodynamic equations on equal footing. The anomalous Ward identity can be used as an alternative starting point to prove the existence of a Goldstone boson, without reference to spontaneous symmetry breaking. This provides an alternative characterization of Landau phase transitions in terms of higher-form symmetries and their anomalies instead of how the symmetries are realized. This treatment is more general and, in particular, includes the case of BKT transitions. As an application of this formalism we construct the hydrodynamic theories of conventional (0-form) and 1-form superfluids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole
hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Schwarzian quantum fluctuations raise the shear viscosity of near-extremal Reissner-Nordström-AdS4 black holes above s/4π by a positive O(1/(CT)^2) correction and are argued to lift the classical T=0 gapless shear mode.
Higher-form (Quasi)Hydrodynamics from Holography: Deformations and Dualities
hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Massless and massive higher-form gauge fields in anti-de Sitter space yield a full low-energy map of diffusive, relaxing, and emergent-photon modes governed by double-trace deformations.
Effective Field Theories for Material Media
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

Spacetime-symmetry-breaking Goldstone EFTs systematically describe bulk and localized excitations of solids, fluids, and superfluids, with new thermodynamic identifications and corrected scattering rates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[37]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, One-form superﬂuids & magnetohydr odynamics, 2018, [arXiv:1811.04913 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2018
[1]

Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds

S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds. Vol. 2: Modern applications . Cambridge University Press, 2013

work page 2013
[2]

D. T. Son, Low-energy quantum eﬀective action for relati vistic superﬂuids, 2002, [arXiv:hep-ph/0204199 [hep-ph] ]

arXiv 2002
[3]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Gener alized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02, 172, 2015 , [ arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2015
[4]

R. E. Glover and M. Tinkham, Conductivity of superconduc ting ﬁlms for photon energies between 0.3 and 40 kTc, Phys. Rev. 108, 243–256, 1957

work page 1957
[5]

D. J. Bishop and J. D. Reppy, Study of the superﬂuid transi tion in two-dimensional 4He ﬁlms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1727–1730, 1978

work page 1978
[6]

P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of condensed matter physics , vol. 1. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2000

work page 2000
[7]

Grozdanov and N

S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul, Generalized global sym metries in states with dynamical defects: The case of the transverse sound in ﬁeld t heory and holography, Phys. Rev. D97, 106005, 2018 , [ arXiv:1801.03199 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2018

Show all 49 references

[8]

Grozdanov, D

S. Grozdanov, D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Generalized glob al symmetries and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D95, 096003, 2017 , [arXiv:1610.07392 [hep-th] ]

2017 arXiv
[9]

D. T. Son and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics with Triangle Ano malies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191601, 2009 , [ arXiv:0906.5044 [hep-th] ]

2009 arXiv
[10]

D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa, Chiral Magnetic condu ctivity, Phys. Rev. D80, 034028, 2009 , [ arXiv:0907.5007 [hep-ph] ]

2009 arXiv
[11]

Amado, K

I. Amado, K. Landsteiner and F. Pena-Benitez, Anomalou s transport coeﬃcients from Kubo formulas in Holography, JHEP 05, 081, 2011 , [ arXiv:1102.4577 [hep-th] ]

2011 arXiv
[12]

Loganayagam, Anomaly Induced Transport in Arbitrar y Dimensions, 2011, [arXiv:1106.0277 [hep-th] ]

R. Loganayagam, Anomaly Induced Transport in Arbitrar y Dimensions, 2011, [arXiv:1106.0277 [hep-th] ]

2011 arXiv
[13]

Jensen, Triangle Anomalies, Thermodynamics, and Hy drodynamics, Phys

K. Jensen, Triangle Anomalies, Thermodynamics, and Hy drodynamics, Phys. Rev. D85, 125017, 2012 , [ arXiv:1203.3599 [hep-th] ]. 27

2012 arXiv
[14]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Anomaly inﬂow an d thermal equilibrium, JHEP 05, 134, 2014 , [ arXiv:1310.7024 [hep-th] ]

2014 arXiv
[15]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Eﬀective a ctions for anomalous hydrodynamics, JHEP 03, 034, 2014 , [ arXiv:1312.0610 [hep-th] ]

2014 arXiv
[16]

L. V. Delacrétaz, A. Nicolis, R. Penco and R. A. Rosen, We ss-Zumino Terms for Relativistic Fluids, Superﬂuids, Solids, and Supersolids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 091601, 2015 , [ arXiv:1403.6509 [hep-th] ]

2015 arXiv
[17]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Adiabatic hydrodynamics: The eightfold way to dissipation, JHEP 05, 060, 2015 , [ arXiv:1502.00636 [hep-th] ]

2015 arXiv
[18]

Córdova, T

C. Córdova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Explo ring 2-Group Global Symmetries, JHEP 02, 184, 2019 , [ arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[19]

Benini, C

F. Benini, C. Córdova and P.-S. Hsin, On 2-Group Global S ymmetries and their Anomalies, JHEP 03, 118, 2019 , [ arXiv:1803.09336 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[20]

Wen, Emergent anomalous higher symmetries from t opological order and from dynamical electromagnetic ﬁeld in condensed matter system s, Phys

X.-G. Wen, Emergent anomalous higher symmetries from t opological order and from dynamical electromagnetic ﬁeld in condensed matter system s, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205139, 2019

2019
[21]

Itzykson and J

C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory . International Series In Pure and Applied Physics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980

1980
[22]

L. Fu, C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators i n three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803, 2007

2007
[23]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110, 2011

2011
[24]

D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Goldstone modes and photoniza tion for higher form symmetries, SciPost Phys. 6, 006, 2019 , [ arXiv:1802.09512 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[25]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. A. Rosen, More on ga pped Goldstones at ﬁnite density: More gapped Goldstones, JHEP 11, 055, 2013 , [ arXiv:1306.1240 [hep-th] ]

2013 arXiv
[26]

M. G. Alford, S. K. Mallavarapu, A. Schmitt and S. Stetin a, From a complex scalar ﬁeld to the two-ﬂuid picture of superﬂuidity, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065001, 2013 . 28

2013
[27]

Schmitt, Introduction to Superﬂuidity, Lect

A. Schmitt, Introduction to Superﬂuidity, Lect. Notes Phys. 888, pp.1–155, 2015 , [arXiv:1404.1284 [hep-ph] ]

2015 arXiv
[28]

Luttinger, Theory of thermal transport coeﬃcients, Physical Review 135, A1505, 1964

J. Luttinger, Theory of thermal transport coeﬃcients, Physical Review 135, A1505, 1964

1964
[29]

R. A. Davison, L. V. Delacrétaz, B. Goutéraux and S. A. Ha rtnoll, Hydrodynamic theory of quantum ﬂuctuating superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B94, 054502, 2016 , [arXiv:1602.08171 [cond-mat.supr-con] ]

2016 arXiv
[30]

S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter . MIT press, 2018

2018
[31]

L. V. Delacrétaz and S. A. Hartnoll, Theory of the superc yclotron resonance and hall response in anomalous two-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 220506, 2018

2018
[32]

D. T. Son, Hydrodynamics of relativistic systems with b roken continuous symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16S1C, 1284–1286, 2001 , [ arXiv:hep-ph/0011246 [hep-ph] ]

2001 arXiv
[33]

Bhattacharya, S

J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya and S. Minwalla, Dis sipative Superﬂuid dynamics from gravity, JHEP 04, 125, 2011 , [ arXiv:1101.3332 [hep-th] ]

2011 arXiv
[34]

Bhattacharya, S

J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and A. Y arom, A Theory of ﬁrst order dissipative superﬂuid dynamics, JHEP 05, 147, 2014 , [arXiv:1105.3733 [hep-th] ]

2014 arXiv
[35]

C. P. Herzog, N. Lisker, P. Surowka and A. Yarom, Transpo rt in holographic superﬂuids, JHEP 08, 052, 2011 , [ arXiv:1101.3330 [hep-th] ]

2011 arXiv
[36]

Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic ﬂuctuations in rel ativistic theories, J

P. Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic ﬂuctuations in rel ativistic theories, J. Phys. A45, 473001, 2012 , [ arXiv:1205.5040 [hep-th] ]

2012 arXiv
[38]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Viscoelastic hydrodynamics and ho lography, 2019, [arXiv:1908.01175 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[39]

Witten, On Holomorphic factorization of WZW and cose t models, Commun

E. Witten, On Holomorphic factorization of WZW and cose t models, Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 189–212, 1992 . 29

1992
[40]

Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Conﬁnem ent, Nucl

E. Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Conﬁnem ent, Nucl. Phys. B223, 433–444, 1983

1983
[41]

C. M. Hull and B. J. Spence, The Geometry of the gauged sig ma model with Wess-Zumino term, Nucl. Phys. B353, 379–426, 1991

1991
[42]

Armas, J

J. Armas, J. Gath, A. Jain and A. V. Pedersen, Dissipativ e hydrodynamics with higher-form symmetry, JHEP 05, 192, 2018 , [ arXiv:1803.00991 [hep-th] ]

2018 arXiv
[43]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Magnetohydrodynamics as superﬂui dity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141603, 2019 , [ arXiv:1808.01939 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[44]

Glorioso and D

P. Glorioso and D. T. Son, Eﬀective ﬁeld theory of magnet ohydrodynamics from generalized global symmetries, 2018, [ arXiv:1811.04879 [hep-th] ]

2018 arXiv
[45]

S. E. Gralla and N. Iqbal, Eﬀective Field Theory of Force -Free Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D99, 105004, 2019 , [ arXiv:1811.07438 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Grozdanov and N

S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul, Generalised global sy mmetries in holography: magnetohydrodynamic waves in a strongly interacting plasm a, JHEP 04, 141, 2019 , [arXiv:1707.04182 [hep-th] ]

2019 arXiv
[47]

C. P. Herzog, P. K. Kovtun and D. T. Son, Holographic mode l of superﬂuidity, Phys. Rev. D79, 066002, 2009 , [ arXiv:0809.4870 [hep-th] ]

2009 arXiv
[48]

C. P. Herzog and A. Yarom, Sound modes in holographic sup erﬂuids, Phys. Rev. D80, 106002, 2009 , [ arXiv:0906.4810 [hep-th] ]

2009 arXiv
[49]

D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Generalized global symmetrie s and holography, SciPost Phys. 4, 005, 2018 , [ arXiv:1707.08577 [hep-th] ]. 30

2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [37]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, One-form superﬂuids & magnetohydr odynamics, 2018, [arXiv:1811.04913 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2018

[2] [1]

Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds

S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds. Vol. 2: Modern applications . Cambridge University Press, 2013

work page 2013

[3] [2]

D. T. Son, Low-energy quantum eﬀective action for relati vistic superﬂuids, 2002, [arXiv:hep-ph/0204199 [hep-ph] ]

arXiv 2002

[4] [3]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Gener alized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02, 172, 2015 , [ arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2015

[5] [4]

R. E. Glover and M. Tinkham, Conductivity of superconduc ting ﬁlms for photon energies between 0.3 and 40 kTc, Phys. Rev. 108, 243–256, 1957

work page 1957

[6] [5]

D. J. Bishop and J. D. Reppy, Study of the superﬂuid transi tion in two-dimensional 4He ﬁlms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1727–1730, 1978

work page 1978

[7] [6]

P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of condensed matter physics , vol. 1. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2000

work page 2000

[8] [7]

Grozdanov and N

S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul, Generalized global sym metries in states with dynamical defects: The case of the transverse sound in ﬁeld t heory and holography, Phys. Rev. D97, 106005, 2018 , [ arXiv:1801.03199 [hep-th] ]

arXiv 2018