Sub-critical well-posedness for the intermediate nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation on the line

Andreia Chapouto; Justin Forlano; Thierry Laurens

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Sub-critical well-posedness for the intermediate nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation on the line

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A gauge transform with four auxiliary variables proves local well-posedness for the intermediate nonlinear Schrödinger equation in every positive Sobolev space.

desk verdict Genuine advance in low-regularity INLS well-posedness, with two fixable gaps in the proof of Theorem 1.1. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06298 v1 pith:MJP7SFVP submitted 2026-08-06 math.AP

Andreia Chapouto , Justin Forlano , Thierry Laurens This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q5335A0276B55

keywords intermediatenonlinearSchrödingerequationcontinuumCalogero-Moserlocalwell-posednessgaugetransformationFourierrestrictionnormspacesbilinearStrichartzestimatesLaxpairequicontinuity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the intermediate nonlinear Schrödinger equation (INLS), a model for internal waves in a stratified fluid, is locally well-posed in $H^s(\mathbb{R})$ for every $s>0$. This covers the full scaling-subcritical range and removes the previous restriction $s>\frac14$. The key move is a gauge transform that rewrites the solution through four auxiliary variables $(v,y,z,w)$ satisfying a closed system, so that the bad low-frequency interactions can be tamed by applying bilinear Strichartz estimates twice and by exploiting nonlinear smoothing. For the completely integrable Calogero–Moser cases, the paper also proves global well-posedness for $0

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gauged quartet (1.11): $v:=P_{+,hi}[e^{i\beta F[u]}u]$, $y:=P_{-,hi}[e^{i\beta F[u]}u]$, $z:=P_{lo}[e^{i\beta F[u]}u]$, and $w:=P_{-,hi}u$, with the primitive $F[f]=\partial_x^{-1}(|f|^2)$. The decomposition (1.10) is what carries the argument: it replaces every factor $|u|^2$ by $|v+y+z|^2$, producing a closed four-equation system in which the hardest trilinear terms can be decomposed further through $Y_{\mathrm{pos}}$ and $Y_{\mathrm{neg}}$; these terms gain spatial regularity in mixed Lebesgue spaces, and the bilinear Strichartz estimate (Lemma 3.3) can be applied twice to recover the full derivative. For the global results, the central object is the conserved quantity $A(\kappa;u,h)=\operatorname{tr}\{(L_{u;h}+i\kappa)^{-1}-(L_0+i\kappa)^{-1}\}$, split into a quadratic part $A^{[2]}$ defined by (6.13) and a quartic-and-higher part $A^{[\ge4]}$; trace-ideal estimates place the higher part under control using $L^2$-equicontinuity, and a weighted average of $A$ over $\kappa$ bounds the $H^s$ norm.

What would settle it

Construct a smooth solution of (1.1) whose maximal existence time is finite while $\|u(t)\|_{H^{1/2+9\delta}}$ remains bounded as $t$ approaches that time; equation (5.3) requires this norm to diverge, so such an example would falsify the proof's uniform lifespan step and with it Theorem 1.1 as argued.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for any $\beta,\gamma\in\mathbb{R}$ and $s>0$, the Cauchy problem (1.1) is locally well-posed in $H^s(\mathbb{R})$, with the solution lying in $C([0,T];H^s)$ and satisfying the Duhamel formula; the data-to-solution map is locally Lipschitz, and the gauged components $v$ and $w$ enjoy nonlinear smoothing. The proof establishes the claim by working not with $u$ alone but with the closed system (5.1) for the quartet $(v,y,z,w)$, in which $u$ is recovered in the explicit form $u=e^{-i\beta F[v+y+z]}(v+Y_{\mathrm{pos}}[v+y+z]+Y_{\mathrm{neg}}[v+y+z,w]+z)+w$ and $y$ obeys (1.12). Because $|u|^2=|v+y+z|^2$, the problematic exponentials disappear from the main nonlinear terms, and the operators $Y_{\mathrm{pos}}$, $Y_{\mathrm{neg}}$ are smoother in space, which lets the estimates close at every $s>0$ rather than only $s>\frac14$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Theorem 1.1 relies on a blow-up criterion for smooth approximate solutions: if such a solution has finite maximal time, its $H^{1/2+9\delta}$ norm must diverge at that time; the criterion is imported from a cited Benjamin–Ono result, and if it does not hold for INLS the uniform-in-$j$ lifespan argument in Section 5.1 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If Theorem 1.1 is correct, INLS is locally well-posed in every Sobolev space above $L^2$, for both focusing and defocusing signs and without a smallness condition on the data.
The same argument yields local well-posedness for the continuum Calogero–Moser equation on the full line with no chirality assumption, matching the result that integrable methods give only in the Hardy space.
Combining Theorems 1.3 and 1.5 gives global well-posedness in $H^s$ for $0<s<\frac12$ and data small in $L^2$; if one can prove that $L^2$-equicontinuity is preserved for larger masses, the global result would hold up to the mass threshold $M^*$ without any smallness condition.
The nonlinear smoothing of $v$ and $w$ means the constructed solutions are the unique limits of smooth solutions, so the solution map is smooth on $H^s$ and the solutions agree with those constructed by integrable methods on the Hardy space.
The method is robust to replacing the lower-order terms: Remark 1.6 states that the same proof works for $L^2$-critical perturbations such as $\gamma|u|^4u$ or filtered derivative nonlinearities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the estimates here degrade as $s\to 0$, so the critical $L^2$ endpoint would need new ideas; the paper only reaches it indirectly by matching the separate small-data construction in [20].
Editorial extension: Remark 1.6 points to filtered nonlinearities such as $uP_+|\partial_x|^{1-\theta}(|u|^2)$ as natural test cases; rerunning Lemmas 4.1–4.10 with that $Q_h$ would verify whether the four-variable mechanism, not integrability, is the real source of the gain.
Editorial extension: if the defocusing conjecture $M^*=\infty$ holds, Theorem 1.5 becomes unconditional global well-posedness for all $L^2$-subcritical data; the only obstruction is a-priori equicontinuity, so a compactness or rigidity argument for the defocusing flow would complete the theory.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a substantial paper. The quartet decomposition (v,y,z,w) and the off-axis trace-class conserved quantities are new mechanisms, and the main result—local well-posedness in H^s for every s>0—is a genuine advance over the previous s>1/4. The global small-data results for the integrable models are a nice bonus. I think the paper deserves a serious referee. But there are two places where the written proof is incomplete.

The first is the blow-up criterion (5.3) used in Section 5.1 to get a uniform lifespan. The paper attributes it to [31], which is a Benjamin-Ono paper, not an INLS paper. The criterion is standard and should follow from local well-posedness at regularity 1/2+9δ, say from de Moura-Pilod for s>1/2, but as written it is unsupported. This is the load-bearing step that converts the high-regularity bound into a uniform T_0, so it needs a correct reference or a short argument. I expect it's fixable, but it has to be fixed.

The second gap is that the proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 5.1 fixes s≤1/2 and never explains why this covers all s>0. For s>1/2, the known local theory already gives something, but the paper doesn't cite or use it to complete the range. A one-paragraph reduction or a statement that the argument works with the obvious modifications would resolve this.

On the positive side, the nonlinear estimates in Section 4 are detailed and the new algebraic structure is convincing. The conservation-law section is long but the trace-class estimates are careful, and the use of the Lax pair from [7] is legitimate—it's a previously established result, not a restatement. I don't see circularity.

The equicontinuity machinery is conditional but honestly labeled; the small-data restriction is explicit and the authors show exactly what would remove it. That's good practice.

Who is this for: researchers working on low-regularity well-posedness for dispersive equations, especially nonlocal NLS and Calogero-Moser type equations. It will be cited. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but the referee should require the authors to fix the citation and the s>1/2 reduction before acceptance. The core ideas look sound.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the intermediate nonlinear Schrödinger equation (INLS) on the line, (1.1), and proves three main results. Theorem 1.1 asserts local well-posedness in H^s(R) for every s>0, with a Duhamel formulation, uniqueness, local Lipschitz dependence, and a nonlinear smoothing estimate. The method introduces a gauge transform and a closed system for a quartet of auxiliary variables (v,y,z,w), and relies on bilinear Strichartz and smoothing estimates rather than complete integrability. Theorems 1.3 and 1.5 address the integrable cases (γ=0, including the continuum Calogero-Moser equation): they establish equicontinuity of orbits for small L^2 data, and global well-posedness in H^s for 0<s<1/2 under a mass/equicontinuity condition, using new conserved quantities built from the Lax pair of the authors' prior work [7].

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 resolves local well-posedness for INLS in the full scaling-subcritical range, improving the authors' previous s>1/4 result and removing the Hardy-space restriction in the CCM case. The technical machinery, especially the closed four-variable system and the double use of bilinear Strichartz estimates to gain nonlinear smoothing, is original and substantial. The conservation-law section is also detailed and does not rely on fitting parameters. However, the proof of Theorem 1.1 has a load-bearing citation gap at the uniform-lifespan step, and the treatment of s>1/2 is not explicitly justified. These issues are local and fixable, so the paper merits major revision rather than rejection.

major comments (3)

[Section 5.1, Eq. (5.3)] The proof of the uniform lifespan in Section 5.1 uses a local well-posedness statement for smooth INLS solutions and the blow-up criterion (5.3), both attributed to reference [31]. Reference [31] is Molinet–Pilod, 'The Cauchy problem for the Benjamin–Ono equation in L^2 revisited,' which treats Benjamin–Ono and contains no statement about INLS. Equation (5.3) is load-bearing: it is exactly what converts the high-regularity bootstrap bound into the j-uniform lower bound T_max(j) ≥ T_0 in (5.16). The criterion is plausible and should follow from the s>1/2 local well-posedness in [14] by a standard persistence-of-regularity argument, but the manuscript supplies neither a correct citation nor a derivation. The same mismatch appears in Lemma 5.2, where the X^{s_1,1} bounds for the gauged variables of smooth INLS solutions are said to follow from [31, Proposition 3.2]. Please correct these citations or provide the missing argument.
[Section 5.1] The proof of Theorem 1.1 begins with 'Fix (δ, s, σ) as in Proposition 5.1 and such that s ≤ 1/2' and at the end states that the proof is complete, without returning to s > 1/2. If the intended reduction is that s > 1/2 is already covered by de Moura–Pilod [14], this must be stated explicitly. Moreover, Theorem 1.1 makes claims beyond mere local well-posedness, namely the decomposition (ii), the X^{s,b} memberships, and the nonlinear smoothing (iv), which are not obviously contained in [14]. As written, Theorem 1.1 asserts more than the proof establishes for s > 1/2.
[Section 6, proof of Proposition 6.5] The sentence 'Uniform convergence guarantees that t ↦ A(κ;u(t)) is differentiable at t_0, and that the series differentiated term-by-term converges' is not a valid implication in general. Uniform convergence of a series of functions does not by itself imply differentiability of the sum or justify term-by-term differentiation. Since the conservation law (6.22) underpins Theorems 1.3 and 1.5, the authors need to justify the interchange, for example by showing that the differentiated series converges uniformly, using the estimates of Proposition 6.4 together with the H^1 bounds on the smooth flow.

minor comments (4)

[Equation (1.2)] In the definition of T_h, the integral is written with f(y) dx; it should be f(y) dy.
[Proposition 5.1] In the last line of the statement, the initial data are written as (v_0, y_0, w_0, z_0); the order should be (v_0, y_0, z_0, w_0) to match the system (5.1).
[Lemma 3.4] The displayed loss N^{15δ}_3 is ambiguous; the proof below indicates the loss is N_3^{15δ}, so the notation should be defined explicitly.
[Section 5.1, after (5.9)] The convergence u_j → u is first shown in C_{T_0} H^σ_x, and later upgraded to C_{T_0} H^s_x. The upgrade is plausible, but the sentence 'P_+ u_j converges to P_+ u in L^∞_{T_0} H^s_x' is stated before all terms on the right-hand side of (5.19) are shown to converge in that space; a brief ordering of the limits would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main theorems are derived from stated algebraic identities and nonlinear estimates; the flagged mis-citation in Section 5.1 is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.1 is proved by introducing the gauge decomposition (1.10)-(1.12), deriving the closed four-variable system (5.1), proving the nonlinear estimates in Lemmas 4.1-4.10, and running a contraction argument in X^{s,b} spaces; no quantity is fitted to data, and the Duhamel solution is not defined in terms of the theorem's conclusion. The decomposition is an algebraic identity, and the uniform lifespan argument for the smooth approximants rests on the system estimates rather than on the target local well-posedness. The global well-posedness results use the Lax pair from the authors' prior work [7], but that is a previously established parameter-free theorem independent of the present claims; while it is a self-citation, it does not smuggle in the result being proved. The one serious flagged issue is in Section 5.1: the blow-up criterion (5.3) and the local well-posedness statement for smooth INLS solutions are attributed to [31], which is a Benjamin-Ono paper and does not state the criterion for INLS. This is an unsupported or mis-cited input and a genuine gap in the uniform-in-j lifespan argument, but it is a correctness or completeness concern rather than circularity: the criterion is not shown to be equivalent to the theorem's conclusion, nor is it a renamed version of an input. Accordingly, no circular step is identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All results rely on standard Fourier restriction norm spaces and trace ideal theory, plus two imported tools from prior work: the Lax pair and the gauge transform lemmas. No free parameters are fitted to data. The main unproved algebraic input is a Cotlar-type identity for the operator T_h, which is load-bearing for the conservation law.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Lax pair for (1.16) from [7, Proposition 6.1] holds for all 0<h<=infinity
Used as the starting point for the conserved quantities A(kappa;u,h) in Section 6; not re-derived in this paper.
domain assumption Gauge transform estimates of Lemma 2.3 and boundedness of G_h in Lemma 2.4 hold as stated
Imported from [7, Section 2.2]; used throughout Sections 3 and 4 without proof.
standard math Bilinear Strichartz estimates (Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4) and Fourier restriction norm embeddings (Lemma 3.1)
Standard tools from Bourgain, Ozawa-Tsutsumi, and Molinet-Pilod; used in all nonlinear estimates.
domain assumption Cotlar-type identity for T_h in the proof of Proposition 6.5
Stated without proof and used to prove the cancellation that makes the conserved quantity A conserved.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sub-critical well-posedness for the intermediate nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation on the line." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJP7SFVP

@misc{pith2026260806298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sub-critical well-posedness for the intermediate nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the line},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJP7SFVP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06298}
}

abstract

We continue our study of the well-posedness theory for the intermediate nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation (INLS). Firstly, we prove that INLS is locally well-posed in $H^s (\mathbb{R})$ for any $s>0$. This improves on our previous result of local well-posedness for any $s>\frac 14$, and covers the full scaling-subcritical range for INLS. In particular, we also obtain the local well-posedness for the continuum Calogero-Moser equation without chirality assumption in the full scaling-subcritical range. Our method relies on a gauge transformation, the derivation of a closed system for four auxiliary variables, and nonlinear smoothing estimates, but not on the completely integrable nature of these equations. Secondly, for the integrable models, we prove global well-posedness for $0<s<\frac12$ for initial data with small $L^2$-norm. Moreover, we show that our global well-posedness result applies whenever $L^2$-equicontinuous sets are preserved by the flow, and so the small-data restriction would be removed by an a-priori equicontinuity result. Our argument relies on a novel family of conserved quantities based upon the Lax pair we discovered in our prior work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[31]

Molinet, D

L. Molinet, D. Pilod,The Cauchy problem for the Benjamin-Ono equation inL 2 revisited, Anal. PDE 5 (2012), no. 2, 365–395

work page 2012
[7]

Chapouto, J

A. Chapouto, J. Forlano, T. Laurens,On the well-posedness of the intermediate nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on the line, arXiv:2511.00302 [math.AP] (2025)

arXiv 2025
[14]

R. P. de Moura, D. Pilod,Local well-posedness for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the energy space, Adv. Differential Equations 15 (2010), no. 9-10, 925–952

work page 2010
[1]

Global well-posedness for intermediate NLS with nonvanishing conditions at infinity

T. Akahori, R. Baddredine, S. Ibrahim, N. Kishimoto,Global well-posedness for the generalized interme- diate NLS with a nonvanishing condition at infinity, arXiv:2512.18998 [math.AP] (2025)

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[2]

Badreddine,On the global well-posedness of the Calogero-Sutherland derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Pure Appl

R. Badreddine,On the global well-posedness of the Calogero-Sutherland derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Pure Appl. Anal. 6 (2024), no. 2, 379–414

work page 2024
[3]

Barros, R

V. Barros, R. P. de Moura, G. Santos,Local well-posedness for the nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in Besov spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 187 (2019), 320–338

work page 2019
[4]

Bourgain,Refinements of Strichartz’ inequality and applications to 2D-NLS with critical nonlinearity, Int

J. Bourgain,Refinements of Strichartz’ inequality and applications to 2D-NLS with critical nonlinearity, Int. Math. Res. Not. 1998, No. 5, 253–283 (1998)

work page 1998
[5]

Bourgain, D

J. Bourgain, D. Li,On an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality, Differential Integral Equations 27 (2014), no. 11-12, 1037–1072

work page 2014

Show all 39 references

[6]

N. Burq, F. Planchon,On well-posedness for the Benjamin-Ono equation, Math. Ann. 340 (2008), no. 3, 497–542

2008
[8]

Chapouto, J

A. Chapouto, J. Forlano, T. Laurens,Well-posedness for the periodic intermediate nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, arXiv:2605.30657 [math.AP] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[9]

Chen,The defocusing Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a non-vanishing condition at infinity, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Vol

X. Chen,The defocusing Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a non-vanishing condition at infinity, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Vol. 58, Iss. 1 (2026)

2026
[10]

Chen,Scattering of the defocusing Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation arXiv:2511.06432v6 [math.AP] (2026)

X. Chen,Scattering of the defocusing Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation arXiv:2511.06432v6 [math.AP] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[11]

X. Chen, E. Lenzmann,Finite-time blow-up solutions for the Calogero–Sutherland derivative NLS, arXiv:2605.28789 [math.AP] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[12]

Christ, M

M. Christ, M. Weinstein,Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Funct. Anal. 100 (1991), 87–109

1991
[13]

R. P. de Moura,Well-posedness for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326 (2007), no. 2, 1254–1267

2007
[15]

M. B. Erdoˇ gan, N. Tzirakis,Dispersive partial differential equations. Wellposedness and applications, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (ISBN 978-1- 316-60293-5/pbk; 978-1-107-14904-5/hbk; 978-1-316-56326-7/ebook). xvi, 186 p. (2016)

2016
[16]

G´ erard, E

P. G´ erard, E. Lenzmann,The Calogero-Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 77, No. 10, 4008–4062 (2024)

2024
[17]

Grafakos, S

L. Grafakos, S. Oh,The Kato-Ponce inequality, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 39 (2014), no. 6, 1128–1157

2014
[18]

Z. Guo, Y. Lin, L. Molinet,Well-posedness in energy space for the periodic modified Benjamin-Ono equation, J. Differ. Equations 256, No. 8, 2778–2806 (2014)

2014
[19]

Hadama,Well-posedness in the full scaling-subcritical range for a class of nonlocal NLS on the line arXiv:2603.28055 [math.AP] (2026)

S. Hadama,Well-posedness in the full scaling-subcritical range for a class of nonlocal NLS on the line arXiv:2603.28055 [math.AP] (2026)

2026
[20]

Hadama,Small-dataL 2 theory for the intermediate NLS and the Calogero–Moser derivative NLS arXiv:2608.01138 [math.AP] (2026)

S. Hadama,Small-dataL 2 theory for the intermediate NLS and the Calogero–Moser derivative NLS arXiv:2608.01138 [math.AP] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[21]

Hogan, M

J. Hogan, M. Kowalski,Turbulent threshold for continuum Calogero-Moser models, Pure Appl. Anal. 6 (2024), no. 4, 941–954

2024
[22]

Ionescu, C

A. Ionescu, C. Kenig,Global well-posedness of the Benjamin-Ono equation in low-regularity spaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), no. 3, 753–798

2007
[23]

T. Kato, G. Ponce,Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (1988) 891–907

1988
[24]

Killip, T

R. Killip, T. Laurens, M. Vi¸ san,Sharp well-posedness for the Benjamin–Ono equation, Invent. Math. 236 (2024), no. 3, 999–1054

2024
[25]

Killip, T

R. Killip, T. Laurens, M. Vi¸ san,Scaling-critical well-posedness for continuum Calogero-Moser models on the line, Commun. Am. Math. Soc. 5 (2025), 284–320

2025
[26]

Killip, K

R. Killip, K. Marsden, M. Vi¸ san,The Hamiltonian formulation of continuum Calogero-Moser models, arXiv:2604.09479 [math.AP] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[27]

Killip, M

R. Killip, M. Ntekoume, M. Vi¸ san,On the well-posedness problem for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Anal. PDE 16 (2023), no. 5, 1245–1270. 58 A. CHAPOUTO, J. FORLANO, T. LAURENS

2023
[28]

Killip, M

R. Killip, M. Vi¸ san, X. Zhang,Low regularity conservation laws for integrable PDE, Geom. Funct. Anal. 28 (2018), no. 4, 1062–1090

2018
[29]

K. Kim, T. Kim, S. Kwon,Construction of smooth chiral finite-time blow-up solutions to Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, to appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc
[30]

T. Kim, S. Kwon,Soliton resolution for Calogero–Moser derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc
[32]

Molinet, F

L. Molinet, F. Ribaud,Well-posedness inH 1 for generalized Benjamin-Ono equation on the circle, Dis- crete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series S, 23(4), 1295-1311
[33]

Ozawa, Y

T. Ozawa, Y. Tsutsumi,Space-time estimates for null gauge forms and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Differ. Integral Equ. 11, No. 2, 201–222 (1998)

1998
[34]

J. A. Pava, R. P. de Moura,Ill-posedness and the nonexistence of standing-waves solutions for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Differential Integral Equations 20 (2007), no. 10, 1107–1130

2007
[35]

D. E. Pelinovsky,Intermediate nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation for internal waves in a fluid of finite depth, Phys. Lett. A, 197 (1995), 401–406

1995
[36]

D. E. Pelinovsky, R. H. J. Grimshaw,A spectral transform for the intermediate nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 36 (1995), 4203–4219

1995
[37]

D. E. Pelinovsky, R. H. J. Grimshaw,Nonlocal models for envelope waves in a stratified fluid, Stud. Appl. Math. 97 (1996), no. 4, 369–391

1996
[38]

Simon,Trace ideals and their applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol

B. Simon,Trace ideals and their applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 120, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005

2005
[39]

Tao,Global well-posedness of the Benjamin-Ono equation inH 1(R), J

T. Tao,Global well-posedness of the Benjamin-Ono equation inH 1(R), J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 1 (2004), no. 1, 27–49. Andreia Chapouto, CNRS, and School of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia Email address:andreia.chapouto@monash.edu Justin Forlano, S...

2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [31]

Molinet, D

L. Molinet, D. Pilod,The Cauchy problem for the Benjamin-Ono equation inL 2 revisited, Anal. PDE 5 (2012), no. 2, 365–395

work page 2012

[2] [7]

Chapouto, J

A. Chapouto, J. Forlano, T. Laurens,On the well-posedness of the intermediate nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on the line, arXiv:2511.00302 [math.AP] (2025)

arXiv 2025

[3] [14]

R. P. de Moura, D. Pilod,Local well-posedness for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the energy space, Adv. Differential Equations 15 (2010), no. 9-10, 925–952

work page 2010

[4] [1]

Global well-posedness for intermediate NLS with nonvanishing conditions at infinity

T. Akahori, R. Baddredine, S. Ibrahim, N. Kishimoto,Global well-posedness for the generalized interme- diate NLS with a nonvanishing condition at infinity, arXiv:2512.18998 [math.AP] (2025)

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[5] [2]

Badreddine,On the global well-posedness of the Calogero-Sutherland derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Pure Appl

R. Badreddine,On the global well-posedness of the Calogero-Sutherland derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Pure Appl. Anal. 6 (2024), no. 2, 379–414

work page 2024

[6] [3]

Barros, R

V. Barros, R. P. de Moura, G. Santos,Local well-posedness for the nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in Besov spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 187 (2019), 320–338

work page 2019

[7] [4]

Bourgain,Refinements of Strichartz’ inequality and applications to 2D-NLS with critical nonlinearity, Int

J. Bourgain,Refinements of Strichartz’ inequality and applications to 2D-NLS with critical nonlinearity, Int. Math. Res. Not. 1998, No. 5, 253–283 (1998)

work page 1998

[8] [5]

Bourgain, D

J. Bourgain, D. Li,On an endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality, Differential Integral Equations 27 (2014), no. 11-12, 1037–1072

work page 2014