REVIEW 2 cited by
Stable maps to Looijenga pairs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A log Calabi-Yau surface with maximal boundary, or Looijenga pair, is a pair $(Y,D)$ with $Y$ a smooth rational projective complex surface and $D=D_1+\dots + D_l \in |-K_Y|$ an anticanonical singular nodal curve. Under some positivity conditions on the pair, we propose a series of correspondences relating five different classes of enumerative invariants attached to $(Y,D)$: 1) the log Gromov-Witten theory of the pair $(Y,D)$, 2) the Gromov-Witten theory of the total space of $\bigoplus_i \mathcal{O}_Y(-D_i)$, 3) the open Gromov-Witten theory of special Lagrangians in a Calabi-Yau 3-fold determined by $(Y,D)$, 4) the Donaldson-Thomas theory of a symmetric quiver specified by $(Y,D)$, and 5) a class of BPS invariants considered in different contexts by Klemm-Pandharipande, Ionel-Parker, and Labastida-Marino-Ooguri-Vafa. We furthermore provide a complete closed-form solution to the calculation of all these invariants.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Sheaves of maximal intersection and multiplicities of stable log maps
The paper proves explicit multiplicity formulas for non-rigid A1-curves and for unions of two rigid A1-curves in maximal-tangency genus 0 log Gromov-Witten invariants on surfaces.
-
Gromov-Witten theory with maximal contacts
For simple normal crossings divisors, logarithmic and local/naive Gromov-Witten invariants with maximal contacts differ, and this paper gives the first counterexamples plus a blowup formula measuring the difference.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.