pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09583 · v2 · pith:MPFOOKE6new · submitted 2019-06-23 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

Spectral Noncommutative Geometry, Standard Model and all that

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords noncommutative geometryspectral triplespectral actionStandard Modelbosonic actionfermionic actionparticle phenomenologyunification
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral triples encode the full Standard Model via a geometric action principle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how noncommutative geometry, formulated through spectral triples, reproduces the particles and forces of the Standard Model. The bosonic spectral action expands to yield the Einstein-Hilbert term, Yang-Mills gauge fields, and Higgs sector. The fermionic action supplies Dirac operators for quarks and leptons in the observed representations. The framework also examines the Euclidean-to-Lorentzian transition and routes to physics beyond the Standard Model.

Core claim

By selecting a spectral triple consisting of a noncommutative algebra, Hilbert space, and Dirac operator, the associated spectral action and fermionic action together generate the complete Lagrangian of the Standard Model, including gravity, gauge interactions, and matter fields, as a direct consequence of the underlying noncommutative geometry.

What carries the argument

The spectral triple, from which the bosonic spectral action (trace of a cutoff function of the Dirac operator) and the fermionic action are derived to produce the model phenomenology.

If this is right

  • The spectral action produces the Einstein-Hilbert term together with the Yang-Mills and Higgs potentials at leading orders in the expansion.
  • Fermions appear with the correct quantum numbers under SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) and with the observed chiral structure.
  • The same geometric data fixes both bosonic and fermionic sectors without independent tuning.
  • The approach admits systematic extensions by enlarging the algebra or changing the representation while preserving the spectral action principle.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could impose relations among Standard Model parameters that become testable once the cutoff scale is fixed by experiment.
  • Adjustments to the spectral triple might accommodate neutrino masses or other data while remaining within the same action principle.
  • The geometric origin of the action suggests a route to quantizing the full theory that treats gravity and matter on equal footing.

Load-bearing premise

A spectral triple can be chosen whose spectral action and fermion content match the observed Standard Model exactly, without extra fields or post-selection.

What would settle it

Discovery of a gauge boson, fermion, or interaction whose representation cannot be realized by any finite spectral triple compatible with the Standard Model gauge group.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09583 by Agostino Devastato, Fedele Lizzi, Maxim Kurkov.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The RG running of the gauge couplings gi , i = 1, 2, 3 in the Standard Model. where the righthand sides are called the beta-functions of the corresponding couplings. These beta functions, generally speaking, depend on all the coupling constants, which are involved in the model and can be computed in a perturbative way via the loop expan￾sion [98–100]. At the one loop approximation the beta functions for … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We review the approach to the standard model of particle interactions based on spectral noncommutative geometry. The paper is (nearly) self-contained and presents both the mathematical and phenomenological aspects. In particular the bosonic spectral action and the fermionic action are discussed in detail, and how they lead to phenomenology. We also discuss the Euclidean vs. Lorentz issues and how to go beyond the standard model in this framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review paper presents the spectral noncommutative geometry framework applied to the Standard Model. It covers the construction of a spectral triple with finite algebra A_F = ℂ ⊕ ℍ ⊕ M_3(ℂ) acting on a 96-dimensional fermion Hilbert space, derives the bosonic spectral action Tr f(D/Λ) and the fermionic action, shows how these yield the Einstein-Hilbert term plus the full SM Lagrangian (including gauge fields, Higgs, and Yukawa couplings), addresses Euclidean versus Lorentzian signature issues, and discusses possible extensions beyond the SM.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the approach supplies a geometric origin for the SM gauge group, fermion representations, and Higgs sector unified with gravity via the spectral action principle. The review is valuable for being nearly self-contained and consolidating both the mathematical setup and phenomenological outputs, including known results such as the tree-level Higgs mass prediction near 170 GeV (later corrected by renormalization).

minor comments (3)
  1. [Section on finite geometry / spectral triple construction] The discussion of the finite spectral triple could include an explicit statement that A_F is selected to reproduce the observed gauge group SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) and chiral fermion content, with a brief comparison to other possible algebras that yield different gauge groups.
  2. [Euclidean vs Lorentz section] In the section addressing Euclidean vs. Lorentz issues, a short table or bullet list summarizing the status of the Wick rotation for the fermionic sector versus the bosonic action would improve clarity for readers new to the framework.
  3. [Beyond the Standard Model section] A few additional references to post-2010 works on beyond-SM extensions (e.g., Pati-Salam or left-right models in NCG) would help situate the review within the current literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our review on spectral noncommutative geometry applied to the Standard Model. The recommendation of minor revision is noted. As no specific major comments were provided in the report, we have no points requiring detailed rebuttal or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper presents established spectral triple framework with no internal circular derivation

full rationale

This is a review summarizing the spectral noncommutative geometry approach to the Standard Model. The bosonic spectral action Tr f(D/Λ) and fermionic terms are presented as following from a chosen spectral triple (A, H, D), with the finite algebra A_F = ℂ ⊕ ℍ ⊕ M_3(ℂ) and its representation on the 96-dimensional fermion Hilbert space referenced to the existing literature rather than derived anew here. No equation or step within the paper reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the selection of the algebra is the framework under review, not an output of a derivation chain internal to this manuscript. External benchmarks (prior Connes-Chamseddine constructions) are invoked without load-bearing self-citation loops.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The review relies on the spectral action principle and the definition of spectral triples from prior literature in noncommutative geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1036 out tokens · 27331 ms · 2026-05-25T18:01:49.584364+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages · 88 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Einstein Gravity as a Symmetry Breaking Effect in Quantum Field Theory,

    S. L. Adler, “Einstein Gravity as a Symmetry Breaking Effect in Quantum Field Theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 729 [Erratum-ibid. 55 (1983) 837]

  2. [2]

    The Minimal Scale Invariant Extension of the Standard Model,

    L. Alexander-Nunneley and A. Pilaftsis, “The Minimal Scale Invariant Extension of the Standard Model,” JHEP 1009 (2010) 021 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)021

  3. [3]

    A non Supersymmetric SO(10) Grand Unified Model for All the Physics below $M_{GUT}$

    G. Altarelli and D. Meloni, “A non supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified model for all the physics below MGUT ,” JHEP 1308 (2013) 021 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2013)021 [arXiv:1305.1001 [hep-ph]]

  4. [4]

    Finite-Mode Regularization Of The Fermion Functional Integral,

    A. A. Andrianov and L. Bonora, “Finite-Mode Regularization Of The Fermion Functional Integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 233, 232 (1984)

  5. [5]

    Finite Mode Regularization Of The Fermion Functional Integral. 2,

    A. A. Andrianov and L. Bonora, “Finite Mode Regularization Of The Fermion Functional Integral. 2,” Nucl. Phys. B 233, 247 (1984)

  6. [6]

    Spectral Action from Anomalies

    A. A. Andrianov, M. A. Kurkov and F. Lizzi, “Spectral Action from Anomalies,” PoS CNCFG 2010 (2010) 024 doi:10.22323/1.127.0024 [arXiv:1103.0478 [hep-th]]

  7. [7]

    Spectral action, Weyl anomaly and the Higgs-Dilaton potential

    A. A. Andrianov, M. A. Kurkov and F. Lizzi, “Spectral action, Weyl anomaly and the Higgs-Dilaton potential,” JHEP1110 (2011) 001 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2011)001 [arXiv:1106.3263 [hep-th]]. φ is a scalar field. A presence of the scalar curvature R breaks the PT symmetry, what prohibits to apply the formalism of [21,101]. 68

  8. [8]

    PT Symmetric Classical and Quantum Cosmology,

    A. A. Andrianov, C. Lan and O. O. Novikov, “PT Symmetric Classical and Quantum Cosmology,” Springer Proc. Phys. 184 (2016) 29

  9. [9]

    Bosonic Spectral Action Induced from Anomaly Cancelation

    A. A. Andrianov and F. Lizzi, “Bosonic Spectral Action Induced from Anomaly Cancelation,” JHEP 1005 (2010) 057 [arXiv:1001.2036 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Aschieri, M

    P. Aschieri, M. Dimitrijevic, P. Kulish, F. Lizzi and J. Wess,Noncommutative space- times: Symmetries in noncommutative geometry and field theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 774 (2009) 1

  11. [11]

    Equations of Motion as Constraints: Superselection Rules, Ward Identities

    M. Asorey, A. P. Balachandran, F. Lizzi and G. Marmo, “Equations of Motion as Constraints: Superselection Rules, Ward Identities,” JHEP 1703 (2017) 136 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)136 [arXiv:1612.05886 [hep-th]]

  12. [12]

    Entangled Scent of a Charge

    M. Asorey, A. P. Balachandran, F. Lizzi and G. Marmo, “Entangled Scent of a Charge,” JHEP 1805 (2018) 130 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)130 [arXiv:1802.03922 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Clifford-based spectral action and renormalization group analysis of the gauge couplings

    U. Aydemir, “Clifford-based spectral action and renormalization group analysis of the gauge couplings,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.4, 325 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 019-6846-9 [arXiv:1902.08090 [hep-ph]]

  14. [14]

    The Higgs Mass, Superconnections and the TeV-scale Left-Right Symmetric Model

    U. Aydemir, D. Minic, C. Sun and T. Takeuchi, “Higgs mass, superconnections, and the TeV-scale left-right symmetric model,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 045020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.045020 [arXiv:1409.7574 [hep-ph]]

  15. [15]

    Pati-Salam Unification from Non-commutative Geometry and the TeV-scale $W_R$ boson

    U. Aydemir, D. Minic, C. Sun and T. Takeuchi, “PatiSalam unification from non- commutative geometry and the TeV-scale WR boson,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) no.01, 1550223 doi:10.1142/S0217751X15502231 [arXiv:1509.01606 [hep-ph]]

  16. [16]

    The 750 GeV diphoton excess in unified $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times SU(4)$ models from noncommutative geometry

    U. Aydemir, D. Minic, C. Sun and T. Takeuchi, “The 750 GeV diphoton excess in unified SU (2)L × SU (2)R × SU (4) models from noncommutative geometry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 (2016) no.18, 1650101 doi:10.1142/S0217732316501017 [arXiv:1603.01756 [hep-ph]]

  17. [17]

    $B$-decay anomalies and scalar leptoquarks in unified Pati-Salam models from noncommutative geometry

    U. Aydemir, D. Minic, C. Sun and T. Takeuchi, “ B-decay anomalies and scalar leptoquarks in unified Pati-Salam models from noncommutative geometry,” JHEP 1809 (2018) 117 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)117 [arXiv:1804.05844 [hep-ph]]

  18. [18]

    The Higgs Mass and the Emergence of New Physics

    U. Aydemir, D. Minic and T. Takeuchi, “The Higgs Mass and the Emergence of New Physics,” Phys. Lett. B 724 (2013) 301 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.06.044 [arXiv:1304.6092 [hep-ph]]

  19. [19]

    A Lorentzian version of the non-commutative geometry of the standard model of particle physics

    J. W. Barrett, “A Lorentzian version of the non-commutative geometry of the stand- ard model of particle physics,” J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 012303 [hep-th/0608221]. 69

  20. [20]

    Covariant perturbation theory. 2: Second order in the curvature. General algorithms,

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Covariant perturbation theory. 2: Second order in the curvature. General algorithms,” Nucl. Phys. B 333 (1990) 471. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90047-H

  21. [21]

    No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, “No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order de- rivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 110402 [arXiv:0706.0207 [hep-th]]

  22. [22]

    Thesis: Semi-Riemannian Noncommutative Geometry, Gauge Theory, and the Standard Model of Particle Physics

    N. Bizi, “Thesis: Semi-Riemannian Noncommutative Geometry, Gauge Theory, and the Standard Model of Particle Physics,” arXiv:1812.00038 [math-ph]

  23. [23]

    Space and time dimensions of algebras with applications to Lorentzian noncommutative geometry and quantum electrodynamics

    N. Bizi, C. Brouder and F. Besnard, “Space and time dimensions of algebras with ap- plication to Lorentzian noncommutative geometry and quantum electrodynamics,” J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) no.6, 062303 doi:10.1063/1.5010424 [arXiv:1611.07062 [hep-th]]

  24. [24]

    Pseudo-Riemannian Spectral Triples for the Standard Model,

    A. Bochniak, “Pseudo-Riemannian Spectral Triples for the Standard Model,” EPJ Web Conf. 201 (2019) 09002. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201920109002

  25. [25]

    Finite Pseudo-Riemannian Spectral Triples and The Standard Model

    A. Bochniak and A. Sitarz, “Finite Pseudo-Riemannian Spectral Triples and The Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.11, 115029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.115029 [arXiv:1804.09482 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    Non-Commutative Geometry, Non-Associative Geometry and the Standard Model of Particle Physics

    L. Boyle and S. Farnsworth, “Non-Commutative Geometry, Non-Associative Geo- metry and the Standard Model of Particle Physics,” New J. Phys. 16 (2014) no.12, 123027 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123027 [arXiv:1401.5083 [hep-th]]

  27. [27]

    A new algebraic structure in the standard model of particle physics

    L. Boyle and S. Farnsworth, “A new algebraic structure in the standard model of particle physics,” JHEP 1806 (2018) 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)071 [arXiv:1604.00847 [hep-th]]

  28. [28]

    The Standard Model as an extension of the noncommutative algebra of forms

    C. Brouder, N. Bizi and F. Besnard, “The Standard Model as an extension of the noncommutative algebra of forms,” arXiv:1504.03890 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    The Gribov problem in Noncommutative QED

    F. Canfora, M. Kurkov, L. Rosa and P. Vitale, “The Gribov problem in Noncommutative QED,” JHEP 1601 (2016) 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)014 [arXiv:1505.06342 [hep-th]]

  30. [30]

    Differential calculus on Jordan algebra and Jordan modules

    A. Carotenuto, L. Dabrowski and M. Dubois-Violette, “Differential calculus on Jordan algebra and Jordan modules,” Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) no.1, 113 doi:10.1007/s11005-018-1102-z [arXiv:1803.08373 [math.QA]]

  31. [31]

    The Spectral Action Principle

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, “The spectral action principle,” Commun. Math. Phys. 186, 731 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9606001]

  32. [32]

    A dress for sm the beggar

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes. “A dress for sm the beggar”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 191601 70

  33. [33]

    Quantum Gravity Boundary Terms from Spectral Action of Noncommutative Space

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, “Quantum Gravity Boundary Terms from Spec- tral Action,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99 (2007) 071302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.071302 [arXiv:0705.1786 [hep-th]]

  34. [34]

    Why the standard model ?

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes. “Why the standard model ?”, J. Geom. Phys. 58 (2008) 38–47

  35. [35]

    Noncommutative Geometric Spaces with Boundary: Spectral Action

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, “Noncommutative Geometric Spaces with Boundary: Spectral Action,” J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011) 317 doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2010.10.002 [arXiv:1008.3980 [hep-th]]

  36. [36]

    Resilience of the Spectral Standard Model

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, “Resilience of the Spectral Standard Model,” JHEP 1209 (2012) 104 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)104 [arXiv:1208.1030 [hep-ph]]

  37. [37]

    Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing,

    A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes and M. Marcolli, “Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11 (2007) 991 [arXiv:hep- th/0610241]

  38. [38]

    Inner Fluctuations in Noncommutative Geometry without the first order condition

    A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes and W. D. van Suijlekom, “Inner Fluctuations in Noncommutative Geometry without the first order condition,” arXiv:1304.7583 [math-ph]

  39. [39]

    Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification

    A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes and W. D. van Suijlekom, “Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification,” arXiv:1304.8050 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Grand Unification in the Spectral Pati-Salam Model

    A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes and W. D. van Suijlekom, “Grand Unification in the Spectral Pati-Salam Model,” JHEP 1511 (2015) 011 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)011 [arXiv:1507.08161 [hep-ph]]

  41. [41]

    A survey of spectral models of gravity coupled to matter,

    A. H. Chamseddine and W. D. Van Suijlekom, “A survey of spectral models of gravity coupled to matter,” arXiv:1904.12392 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

  43. [43]

    Radiative Corrections as the Ori- gin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, “Radiative Corrections as the Ori- gin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1888

  44. [44]

    Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

    A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

  45. [45]

    Gravity coupled with matter and the foundations of noncommutative geometry

    A. Connes. “Gravity coupled with matter and the foundations of noncommutative geometry”, Commun. Math. Phys. 182 (1996) 155–176

  46. [46]

    On the spectral characterization of manifolds

    A. Connes, “On the spectral characterization of manifolds,” J. Noncommutative Geometry, 7 1, 2013. arXiv:0810.2088 [math.OA]. 71

  47. [47]

    Particle Models And Noncommutative Geometry (expanded Version),

    A. Connes and J. Lott, “Particle Models And Noncommutative Geometry (expanded Version),” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 18B (1991) 29

  48. [48]

    Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives

    A. Connes, M. Marcolli, “Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives”, AMS 2007

  49. [49]

    Connes and H

    A. Connes and H. Moscovici, Type III and spectral triples , Traces in number the- ory, geoemtry and quantum fields, Aspects Math. E38 (2008), no. Friedt. Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 57–71

  50. [50]

    On noncommutative geometry of the Standard Model: fermion multiplet as internal forms

    L. Dabrowski, “On noncommutative geometry of the Standard Model: fermion multiplet as internal forms,” in Geometric Methods in Physics XXXVI: Workshop and Summer School, Biaowiea , edited by Piotr Kielanowski, A. Odzijewicz, Emma Previato, Birkhauser, 2017, arXiv:1711.06492 [math-ph]

  51. [51]

    The Standard Model in noncommutative geometry: fundamental fermions as internal forms

    L. Dbrowski, F. D’Andrea and A. Sitarz, “The Standard Model in noncommutative geometry: fundamental fermions as internal forms,” Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018) no.5, 1323 doi:10.1007/s11005-017-1036-x [arXiv:1703.05279 [math-ph]]

  52. [52]

    Product of real spectral triples

    L. Dabrowski and G. Dossena, “Product of real spectral triples,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 8 (2011) 1833 doi:10.1142/S021988781100597X [arXiv:1011.4456 [math-ph]]

  53. [53]

    Fermion masses, mass-mixing and the almost commutative geometry of the Standard Model

    L. Dbrowski and A. Sitarz, “Fermion masses, mass-mixing and the almost commutative geometry of the Standard Model,” JHEP 1902 (2019) 068 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)068 [arXiv:1806.07282 [hep-th]]

  54. [54]

    The Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry and Morita equivalence

    F. D’Andrea and L. Dabrowski, “The Standard Model in Noncommutative Geo- metry and Morita equivalence,” Journal of Noncommutative Geometry 10, (2) 2016, 551-578, doi: 10.4171/JNCG/242 [arXiv:1501.00156 [math-ph]]

  55. [55]

    Wick Rotation and Fermion Doubling in Noncommutative Geometry,

    F. D’Andrea, M. A. Kurkov and F. Lizzi, “Wick Rotation and Fermion Doubling in Noncommutative Geometry,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 025030 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.025030

  56. [56]

    Noncommutative geometry, Grand Symmetry and twisted spectral triple

    A. Devastato, “Noncommutative geometry, Grand Symmetry and twisted spec- tral triple,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 634 (2015) no.1, 012008 doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/634/1/012008 [arXiv:1503.03861 [hep-th]]

  57. [57]

    Lorentz signature and twisted spectral triples,

    A. Devastato, S. Farnsworth, F. Lizzi and P. Martinetti, “Lorentz signature and twisted spectral triples,” JHEP 1803 (2018) 089 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)089 [arXiv:1710.04965 [hep-th]]

  58. [58]

    Grand Symmetry, Spectral Action, and the Higgs mass

    A. Devastato, F. Lizzi and P. Martinetti, “Grand Symmetry, Spectral Action, and the Higgs mass,” JHEP 1401 042 (2014) [arXiv:1304.0415 [hep-ph]]

  59. [59]

    Higgs mass in Noncommutative Geometry

    A. Devastato, F. Lizzi and P. Martinetti, “Higgs mass in Noncommutative Geo- metry,” Fortschr. Phys. 62, 863 (2014). arXiv:1403.7567 [hep-th]. 72

  60. [60]

    Unification of Coupling Constants, Dimension six Operators and the Spectral Action

    A. Devastato, F. Lizzi, C. Valcarcel Flores and D. Vassilevich, “Unification of Coup- ling Constants, Dimension six Operators and the Spectral Action,” arXiv:1410.6624 [hep-ph]

  61. [61]

    Twisted spectral triple for the Standard Model and spontaneous breaking of the Grand Symmetry

    A. Devastato and P. Martinetti, “Twisted spectral triple for the Standard Model and spontaneous breaking of the Grand Symmetry,” Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 20 (2017) no.1, 2 doi:10.1007/s11040-016-9228-7 [arXiv:1411.1320 [hep-th]]

  62. [62]

    Dixmier, Les C∗ -algebres et leurs representations (Gauthier-Villars, 1964)

    J. Dixmier, Les C∗ -algebres et leurs representations (Gauthier-Villars, 1964)

  63. [63]

    Exceptional quantum geometry and particle physics

    M. Dubois-Violette, “Exceptional quantum geometry and particle physics,” Nucl. Phys. B 912 (2016) 426 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.018 [arXiv:1604.01247 [math.QA]]

  64. [64]

    Noncommutative Differential Geo- metry of Matrix Algebras,

    M. Dubois-Violette, R. Kerner and J. Madore, “Noncommutative Differential Geo- metry of Matrix Algebras,” J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 316

  65. [65]

    Eckstein and B

    M. Eckstein and B. Iochum, Spectral Action in Noncommutative Geometry, Springer 2019

  66. [66]

    Farnsworth, Standard model physics and beyond from noncom- mutative geometry , Ph

    S. Farnsworth, Standard model physics and beyond from noncom- mutative geometry , Ph. D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, (2015) https://inspirehep.net/record/1419192/files/Farnsworth_Shane.pdf

  67. [67]

    The graded product of real spectral triples,

    S. Farnsworth, “The graded product of real spectral triples,” J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) no.2, 023507 doi:10.1063/1.4975410 [arXiv:1605.07035 [math-ph]]

  68. [68]

    Non-Associative Geometry and the Spectral Action Principle

    S. Farnsworth and L. Boyle, “Non-Associative Geometry and the Spectral Action Principle,” JHEP 1507 (2015) 023 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)023 [arXiv:1303.1782 [hep-th]]

  69. [69]

    Rethinking Connes' approach to the standard model of particle physics via non-commutative geometry

    S. Farnsworth and L. Boyle, “Rethinking Connes’ approach to the standard model of particle physics via non-commutative geometry,” New J. Phys. 17 (2015) no.2, 023021 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023021 [arXiv:1408.5367 [hep-th]]

  70. [70]

    Fell, R.S

    J.M.G. Fell, R.S. Doran, Representations of ∗ -Algebras, Locally Compact Groups and Banach ∗ -Algebraic Bundles (Academic Press, 1988)

  71. [71]

    Inertial Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Quantum Scale Invariance

    P. G. Ferreira, C. T. Hill and G. G. Ross, “Inertial Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Quantum Scale Invariance,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.11, 116012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.116012 [arXiv:1801.07676 [hep-th]]

  72. [72]

    Inflation in a scale invariant universe

    P. G. Ferreira, C. T. Hill, J. Noller and G. G. Ross, “Inflation in a scale invariant universe,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.12, 123516 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123516 [arXiv:1802.06069 [astro-ph.CO]]

  73. [73]

    Franco, Temporal lorentzian spectral triples, Rev

    N. Franco, Temporal lorentzian spectral triples, Rev. Math. Phys. 26 (2014) no.08, 1430007. 73

  74. [74]

    Franco and M

    N. Franco and M. Eckstein, An algebraic formulation of causality for noncommut- ative geometry, Class. Quantum Grav. 30 (2013), 135007

  75. [75]

    Franco and M

    N. Franco and M. Eckstein, Exporing the causal structure of almost commutative geometries, SIGMA 10 (2014), no. 010, 23

  76. [76]

    Comment On Chiral And Conformal Anomalies,

    K. Fujikawa, “Comment On Chiral And Conformal Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1733 (1980)

  77. [77]

    The Standard model in non- commutative geometry and fermion doubling,

    J. M. Gracia-Bondia, B. Iochum and T. Schucker, “The Standard model in non- commutative geometry and fermion doubling,” Phys. Lett. B 416 (1998) 123 [hep- th/9709145]

  78. [78]

    Gracia-Bondia, J.C

    J.M. Gracia-Bondia, J.C. Varilly, H. Figueroa, Elements of Noncommutative Geo- metry, Birkhauser, 2000

  79. [79]

    Inertial Symmetry Breaking

    C. T. Hill, “Inertial Symmetry Breaking,” arXiv:1803.06994 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Spectral action for torsion with and without boundaries

    B. Iochum, C. Levy and D. Vassilevich, “Spectral action for torsion with and without boundaries,” Commun. Math. Phys. 310 (2012) 367 doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1406-7 [arXiv:1008.3630 [hep-th]]

Showing first 80 references.