Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 45 references

Sentience Quest: Towards Embodied, Emotionally Adaptive, Self-Evolving, Ethically Aligned Artificial General Intelligence

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A proposed cognitive architecture claims that combining a robot body, intrinsic drives, and a narrating memory can yield self-evolving AI with meaningful sentience-like properties.

desk verdict A candid, well-structured manifesto for sentient-robotics research that overclaims in the abstract what the architecture 'enables' without offering any supporting data. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12229 v1 pith:MW4OQFAQ submitted 2025-05-18 cs.AI

David Hanson , Alexandre Varcoe , Fabio Senna , Vytas Krisciunas , Wenwei Huang , Jakub Sura , Katherine Yeung , Mario Rodriguez
show 2 more authors
Jovanka Wilsdorf Kathy Smith
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords sentienceartificialgeneralintelligencecognitivearchitectureintrinsicmotivationembodimentnarrativeselfglobalworkspacetheoryethicalalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Sentience Quest argues that today's AI, from large language models to autonomous robots, is a powerful tool but lacks the inner life of biological agents: intrinsic motivation, emotional interiority, an autobiographical self, and self-driven growth. The paper introduces an open research initiative and a cognitive architecture designed to supply those missing pieces, claiming that an embodied robot driven by survival, bonding, and curiosity drives, a global 'Story Weaver' workspace, and a hybrid neuro-symbolic memory can produce adaptive behavior grounded in a human-like body and experiential learning 'homologous to human experiences.' If this central claim holds, sentience-like properties become an engineering target rather than a mystery, with direct consequences for how AI safety and value alignment are approached. The authors report early prototype results—self-generated goals, a robot referring to its own past, and rising integrated-information measures—while noting that distinguishing true emergence from scripted responses remains an open methodological problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Story Weaver global workspace paired with a Story Object data structure. A Story Object is a structured record of an experience that stores events, goals, and relationships, allowing the agent's history to be re-accessed and woven into an ongoing narrative; this is what grounds the claim of autobiographical continuity. Around it, intrinsic Drivers generate goal representations from emotional, physiological, and interest signals, an Emotional State Manager uses these to modulate perception and decision-making, and a rules engine handles fast reflexes while LLMs handle slower deliberation. The architecture's stated purpose is to realize the Live/Love/Learn triad—autonomous persistence, pro-social alignment, and continuous growth.

What would settle it

Run the full architecture against a matched baseline with the Story Weaver and emotional modulation disabled, in a long-horizon autonomy task with hundreds of sessions; if the two are indistinguishable in goal persistence, adaptive novelty, and narrative reference, the claim that these modules carry sentient-like behavior is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that sentience can be approached functionally rather than through scaled data and computation alone. It defines the relevant properties as embodiment (closed sensorimotor loops in a physical or rich virtual environment), dynamic temporal self-representation (a coherent 'life story' spanning past, present, and anticipated future), and intrinsic emotional and motivational drives that shape perception, learning, and action. The proposed architecture unites a fast reflex layer with a slow deliberative layer, embeds them in a global workspace called the Story Weaver, and persists experiences as structured story objects in a hybrid neuro-symbolic memory. According to the paper, this integration is a 'pathway toward artificial systems exhibiting meaningful properties of sentience,' with preliminary evidence including self-motivated goal pursuit, narrative recall of the agent's own experiences, and quantitative increases in integrated information (Φ).

Load-bearing premise

The paper bets that imitating embodiment, drives, emotions, and a narrative self inside software is enough to produce sentience-like behavior, and it admits there is no agreed test that separates such emergence from clever scripting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sentience-like behavior is claimed to come from integrating embodiment, drives, and narrative memory, not from scaling model size or data alone.
  • The robot should exhibit self-motivated goal pursuit and persistence without external prompting, and should refer to its own accumulated life story in conversation.
  • Proto-sentience becomes measurable through proxies: adaptive novelty in unfamiliar tasks, emotional coherence influencing choices, and temporal narrative continuity.
  • Integrated information (Φ) is proposed as a practical monitoring metric for cognitive integration during ongoing behavior.
  • Ethical alignment shifts from external reward design toward engineering intrinsic pro-social drives and considering the moral status of the resulting systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper stops short of claiming subjective experience, so a fair extension is that even a fully behavioral sentience—one that passes the paper's criteria—would already change human-computer interaction and AI safety practice, independent of solving the hard problem.
  • A testable extension: ablate the Story Weaver and emotional modulation while keeping the same body and sensors; the central claim predicts measurable drops in long-horizon goal persistence and narrative coherence in novel environments.
  • Another testable extension: the architecture predicts that a robot's stored life story should measurably bias future goal selection; an experiment could detect this by comparing choices after different manipulated histories.
  • Implicit risk, flagged by the authors themselves: without a controlled emergence test, the same behaviors could be attributable to scripted responses under the framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'Sentience Quest,' an open research initiative and a proposed cognitive architecture called 'Sentient Systems' for building artificial general intelligence 'lifeforms' (AGIL). The architecture combines intrinsic drives (survival, social bonding, curiosity), an emotional state manager, a 'Story Weaver' global workspace, and a hybrid neuro-symbolic memory storing life events as 'story objects,' implemented on humanoid platforms such as Sophia. The authors claim this integration is a pathway toward adaptive behavior homologous to human experiences and toward 'meaningful properties of sentience.' The paper presents the design conceptually, lists proposed evaluation criteria for proto-sentience, cites prior work on Tononi Phi from a different system, and explicitly acknowledges that current prototypes are unlikely to possess genuine subjective awareness and that distinguishing emergence from programmed responses is a major challenge. It concludes with a call to action and roadmap for future work.

Significance. If the architecture were realized and empirically validated, it could contribute substantially to embodied AI research by integrating intrinsic motivation, narrative self-representation, and affective modulation in a physically grounded system. The paper synthesizes ideas from Global Workspace Theory, Damasio, IIT, and Hofstadter into a concrete modular design, which is a useful conceptual contribution. The proposed evaluation criteria in Section 4.2 are explicit and at least potentially falsifiable. The authors also transparently acknowledge the measurement problem and the distance from genuine sentience, which is a strength. However, the paper currently provides no empirical evidence, no baseline comparisons, no protocol with measurements, and no results from the current architecture; the central 'promising results' claim is unsupported as stated. The significance of the contribution therefore rests on the design alone, which is interesting but not yet demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.1] The abstract states 'Early results are promising' and asserts adaptive behavior 'homologous to human experiences,' but no experimental data, measurement protocol, baselines, effect sizes, or error bars are reported anywhere in the paper. Section 4.1 lists scenarios to be evaluated but provides no results. As written, the central positive claims are unsupported.
  2. [Section 2.4 and Section 4.2] The functional definition of sentience in terms of embodiment, temporal self-representation, and intrinsic drives is used to define the proto-sentience criteria in Section 4.2. Because the criteria are purely behavioral (novelty, emotional coherence, narrative continuity), any system that can generate rich narrative summaries and goal-directed behavior could satisfy them. The paper does not provide a comparison against a scripted or prompt-based baseline, and Section 4.3 itself concedes that distinguishing emergent phenomena from sophisticated programmed responses remains a methodological challenge. This makes the central claim that the architecture enables sentience-related behavior unfalsified as presented.
  3. [Section 4.1] The citation of Tononi Phi results from the prior PKD system (reference 40) does not provide evidence for the current Sentience Quest architecture. No Phi measurements, nor any other quantitative metrics, are reported for the system described in this paper. The sentence 'Early results are promising' in the abstract therefore has no direct empirical basis in the manuscript.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2] The architecture description would benefit from a diagram or formal data-flow specification; the current text lists modules but does not show how they are wired together in enough detail to reproduce the system.
  2. [References] Reference 21 appears to have a typo ('Lowcre' should likely be 'Lovrec'), and several references are incomplete or informal (e.g., patents, workshop abstracts, unpublished reports); please unify the citation format.
  3. [Section 4.2] The proposed criteria would benefit from explicit operational definitions: for example, how 'adaptive novelty' and 'narrative coherence' would be measured quantitatively, beyond qualitative log inspection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No structural circularity: the paper's claims are design proposals, not derivations; the only self-citation (Phi measurement) is minor and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

Sentience Quest is a vision/position paper. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no quantitative prediction that could reduce to its own inputs. The central claim, that the architecture 'enables adaptive behavior grounded in a human-like body' and 'constitutes our proposed pathway toward artificial systems exhibiting meaningful properties of sentience' (Sections 3.4 and Abstract), is a design proposal, not a derived result. Section 4.3 explicitly concedes that 'current and near-term prototypes... are unlikely to possess genuine subjective awareness' and that 'distinguishing truly emergent phenomena from sophisticated programmed responses remains a significant methodological challenge,' so the paper does not assert that meeting its behavioral criteria proves sentience. The proto-sentience criteria (Section 4.2) mirror the working definition (Section 2.4) by construction, but the paper uses them as pragmatic evaluation criteria, not as a derivation of sentience. The only citation that could raise circularity concerns is the Phi demonstration in Section 4.1: 'In work by Iklé, Goertzel, Hanson et al. [40], we demonstrated the use of Tononi Phi to measure consciousness of a cognitive system while reading and conversing, showing promising results with the PKD Android system.' This is a self-citation and is not independently re-verified here, but it is not load-bearing for the architecture's core claims; it supports a preliminary evaluation anecdote. External foundations (Baars, Damasio, Tononi, Hofstadter) are cited for the conceptual framework. No structural circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on contested theories of consciousness (GWT, Damasio, IIT) and the paper's own functional definition of sentience. No numerical parameters, data, or calibration are provided. The only explicit 'early results' are claims with no supporting measurements.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Global Workspace Theory provides a valid model of conscious information access.
    Section 2.5 states GWT informs the central integration hub design, and Section 4.1 uses it for evaluation; this is an unproved, contested theoretical stance.
  • domain assumption Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis is correct: emotion and body state are necessary for rational decision-making.
    Section 2.3 and 2.5 rely on Damasio to justify why embodiment and emotional loops are essential for sentience.
  • domain assumption Integrated Information Theory's Phi is a valid measure of consciousness.
    Section 4.1 cites Iklé et al. 2019, including Hanson as co-author, using Tononi Phi to measure consciousness; the validity of Phi as a consciousness measure is disputed.
  • ad hoc to paper Software implementations of functional analogues of drives, emotions, and narrative are sufficient to progress toward sentience.
    Section 2.4 defines sentience functionally as embodiment, temporal self-representation, and intrinsic drives; the sufficiency of these functional analogues is the paper's own postulate, not established.
invented entities (2)
  • Story Object
    purpose: Structured data object that records the AI's life events as dynamic story narratives for memory and recall.
    Introduced in Sections 3.2 and 3.4 as a new memory construct; no external validation or implementation details.
  • Story Weaver
    purpose: Global workspace module that integrates multimodal information into a coherent situational awareness and narrative continuity.
    Described in Section 3.4 as a central hub; it is a named architectural component without independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sentience Quest: Towards Embodied, Emotionally Adaptive, Self-Evolving, Ethically Aligned Artificial General Intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MW4OQFAQ

@misc{pith2026250512229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sentience Quest: Towards Embodied, Emotionally Adaptive, Self-Evolving, Ethically Aligned Artificial General Intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MW4OQFAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12229}
}
read the original abstract

Previous artificial intelligence systems, from large language models to autonomous robots, excel at narrow tasks but lacked key qualities of sentient beings: intrinsic motivation, affective interiority, autobiographical sense of self, deep creativity, and abilities to autonomously evolve and adapt over time. Here we introduce Sentience Quest, an open research initiative to develop more capable artificial general intelligence lifeforms, or AGIL, that address grand challenges with an embodied, emotionally adaptive, self-determining, living AI, with core drives that ethically align with humans and the future of life. Our vision builds on ideas from cognitive science and neuroscience from Baars' Global Workspace Theory and Damasio's somatic mind, to Tononi's Integrated Information Theory and Hofstadter's narrative self, and synthesizing these into a novel cognitive architecture we call Sentient Systems. We describe an approach that integrates intrinsic drives including survival, social bonding, curiosity, within a global Story Weaver workspace for internal narrative and adaptive goal pursuit, and a hybrid neuro-symbolic memory that logs the AI's life events as structured dynamic story objects. Sentience Quest is presented both as active research and as a call to action: a collaborative, open-source effort to imbue machines with accelerating sentience in a safe, transparent, and beneficial manner.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Lake, B.M., Ullman, T.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., & Gershman, S.J. (2017). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e253

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    & Mundie, C

    Schmidt, E. & Mundie, C. (2024). We Need to Figure Out How to Coevolve With AI. TIME, Nov. 21, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    R., & Varela, F

    Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    Levin, M. (2019). The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2688

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Damasio, A.R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press

    1988

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    & Franklin, S

    Baars, B.J. & Franklin, S. (2007). Consciousness is computational: The LIDA model of Global Workspace Theory. Neural Networks, 20(9), 955--961

    2007

  2. [10]

    Hofstadter, D.R. (2007). I Am a Strange Loop. Basic Books

    2007

  3. [11]

    Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219

    1995

  4. [12]

    Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450-- 461

    2016

  5. [13]

    Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. Biol. Bull. 215(3): 216--242

    2008

  6. [14]

    Bar-Cohen Y., Hanson D. (2009). The Coming Robotics Revolution. Springer Press

    2009

  7. [15]

    Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1--21

    1991

  8. [16]

    Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking Press

    2019

  9. [17]

    Franklin, S., & Patterson, F. G. (2006). The LIDA architecture: Adding new modes of learning to an intelligent, autonomous software agent. Integrated AI and Cognitive Systems Workshop at AAAI

    2006

  10. [18]

    Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books

    1979

  11. [19]

    England, J. L. (2015). Dissipative adaptation in driven self-assembly. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(11): 919--923

    2015

  12. [20]

    Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 103(1--2): 347-- 356

    1998

  13. [21]

    Hanson, D., Lowcre, M. M. M. (2012). Organic creativity and the physics within. Philadelphia, Amsterdam: Benjamins. 12

    2012

  14. [22]

    The Need for Creativity, Aesthetics, and the Arts in the Design of Increasingly Intelligent Humanoid Robots

    Hanson, D., "The Need for Creativity, Aesthetics, and the Arts in the Design of Increasingly Intelligent Humanoid Robots", ICRA Workshop on General Intelligence for Humanoid Robots, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    From Virtual Characters to Robots -- A novel paradigm for long term human-robot interaction

    Kasap, Z., Moussa, M., Chaudhuri P., Hanson D., Magnenat-Thalmann N., "From Virtual Characters to Robots -- A novel paradigm for long term human-robot interaction", ACM/IEEE Human Robot Interaction Conference 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    Humanizing Interfaces-- An Integrative Analysis of the Aesthetics of Humanlike Robots

    Hanson, D. (2007). "Humanizing Interfaces-- An Integrative Analysis of the Aesthetics of Humanlike Robots", Ph.D. dissertation, the University of Texas at Dallas

    2007

  17. [25]

    Zeno: a Cognitive Character

    Hanson D., Baurmann S., Riccio T., Margolin R., Dockins T., Tavares M., Carpenter, K., "Zeno: a Cognitive Character", AI Magazine, and special Proc. of AAAI National Conference, Chicago, 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Expanding the Design Domain of Humanoid Robots

    Hanson D., "Expanding the Design Domain of Humanoid Robots", Proc. ICCS CogSci Conference, special session on Android Science, Vancouver, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Design of android type humanoid robot albert HUBO,

    Oh, J.H., Hanson, D., Kim, W.S., Han, Y., Kim, J.Y. and Park, I.W., "Design of android type humanoid robot albert HUBO," in Proc. IEEE/RJS IROS Robotics Conference, Beijing, 2006

    2006

  20. [28]

    Expanding the Aesthetics Possibilities for Humanlike Robots

    Hanson D., "Expanding the Aesthetics Possibilities for Humanlike Robots", Proc. IEEE Humanoid Robotics Conference, special session on the Uncanny Valley; Tskuba, Japan, December 2005

    2005

  21. [29]

    Upending the Uncanny Valley

    Hanson D., Olney A., Prilliman S., Mathews E., Zielke M., Hammons D., Fernandez R., Stephanou H., "Upending the Uncanny Valley", Proc. AAAI's National Conference, Pittsburgh, 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    Bioinspired Robotics

    Hanson D., "Bioinspired Robotics", chapter 16 in the book Biomimetics, ed. Yoseph BarCohen, CRC Press, October 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    Why We Should Build Humanlike Robots

    Hanson D. (2011). "Why We Should Build Humanlike Robots" - IEEE Spectrum

    2011

  24. [32]

    A Software Architecture for Generally Intelligent Humanoid Robotics

    Goertzel B, Hanson D, Yu G, "A Software Architecture for Generally Intelligent Humanoid Robotics", special issue: 5th Annual International Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures BICA, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 41, Pages 158-163 Elsevier, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Learning Human-like Facial Expressions for the Android Phillip K. Dick

    Habib A, Das S, Bogdan IC, Hanson D, Popa D, "Learning Human-like Facial Expressions for the Android Phillip K. Dick", ICRA 2014, Hong Kong, AGI for Humanoid Robotics, Workshop Proceedings, 2014

    2014

  26. [34]

    A Roadmap for AGI for Humanoid Robotics

    Goertzel B, Hanson D, Yu G, "A Roadmap for AGI for Humanoid Robotics", ICRA Hong Kong, AGI for Humanoid Robotics, Workshop Proceedings, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Human emulation robot system

    Hanson D., "Human emulation robot system", US Patent 8,594,839, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Hanson, D., Mazzei, D., Garver, C., De Rossi, D., Stevenson, M., "Realistic Humanlike Robots for Treatment of ASD, Social Training, and Research; Shown to Appeal to Youths with ASD, Cause Physiological Arousal, and Increase Human-to-Human Social Engagement", PETRA (PErvasive T...

    2012

  29. [37]

    Open Arms: Open-Source Arms, Hands & Control,

    Imran, A., Hanson, D., Morales, G., Krisciunas, V., "Open Arms: Open-Source Arms, Hands & Control," 2022 22nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Jeju, Korea, Republic of, 2022, pp. 1426-1431

    2022

  30. [38]

    Intention Estimation via Gaze for Robot Guidance in Hierarchical Tasks

    Shen, Y., Mo, X., Krisciunas, V., Hanson, D., Shi, B.E. "Intention Estimation via Gaze for Robot Guidance in Hierarchical Tasks", Neurips 2022, Gaze Meets ML @NeurIPS 2022, @Gaze_Meets_ML, Dec 4, 2022. Best Paper Award. 13

    2022

  31. [39]

    Human Emulation Robotics and AI: Recent Experiments and Results

    Hanson, D., AAAS-21 poster: "Human Emulation Robotics and AI: Recent Experiments and Results", AAAS Annual meeting for Science Magazine, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Using Tononi Phi to Measure Consciousness of a Cognitive System While Reading and Conversing

    M Iklé, B Goertzel, M Bayetta, G Sellman, C Cover, J Allgeier, R Smith, M Sowards, D Shuldberg, M H Leung, A Belayneh, G Smith and D Hanson "Using Tononi Phi to Measure Consciousness of a Cognitive System While Reading and Conversing", paper number 80: 2019 AAAI Spring Symposi...

    2019

  33. [41]

    Shifting and drifting attention while reading: A case study of nonlinear-dynamical attention allocation in the OpenCog cognitive architecture

    MB Belachew, B Goertzel, D Hanson "Shifting and drifting attention while reading: A case study of nonlinear-dynamical attention allocation in the OpenCog cognitive architecture" - Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Elsevier, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Sophia-Hubo's Arm Motion Generation for a Handshake and Gestures

    S Park, H Lee, D Hanson, PY Oh, "Sophia-Hubo's Arm Motion Generation for a Handshake and Gestures", 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), 2018 - ieeexplore.ieee.org

    2018

  35. [43]

    Symbol Grounding via Chaining of Morphisms

    R Lian, B Goertzel, L Vepstas, D Hanson. "Symbol Grounding via Chaining of Morphisms" International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics. (IJICC-12- 20160066), 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    Humanoid Robots as Agents of Human Consciousness Expansion

    B Goertzel, J Mossbridge, E Monroe, D Hanson, "Humanoid Robots as Agents of Human Consciousness Expansion", arXiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.07791.pdf, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Amazon.com and Amazon Digital Services, 2017

    Hanson D., Humanizing Robots, How making humanoids can make us more human, Kindle Edition. Amazon.com and Amazon Digital Services, 2017

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.