Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 7 minor 3 cited by

OmniV2V: Versatile Video Generation and Editing via Dynamic Content Manipulation

T0 review · 6 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read OmniV2V claims that one model, with a single dynamic condition-injection module and a vision-language instruction module, can match or beat task-specific models on eight video generation and editing tasks.

desk verdict A well-built unified video editing architecture whose 'matches or beats the best' claim is not yet supported by the reported numbers; the evaluation needs matched-resolution baselines, error bars, released artifacts, and a consistency fix before it can carry the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01801 v1 pith:MWYG777M submitted 2025-06-02 cs.CV

Sen Liang , Zhentao Yu , Zhengguang Zhou , Teng Hu , Hongmei Wang , Yi Chen , Qin Lin , Yuan Zhou
show 3 more authors
Xin Li Qinglin Lu Zhibo Chen
This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords videogenerationeditingdiffusiontransformerinstruction-basedmask-guidedpose-guidedsynthesismulti-taskmodeldynamiccontentmanipulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that tasks normally built as separate systems—moving an object, adding an object, mask-guided editing, virtual try-on, inpainting, outpainting, human animation, and controllable character synthesis—can be handled by one video model with one set of weights. It proposes a unified dynamic content manipulation injection module that accepts any combination of reference images, background videos, mask videos, and pose videos, plus a visual-text instruction module that connects the user's text request to the visual reference. A multi-task data processing system reuses overlapping data across tasks to build training sets and a test benchmark. The reported experiments say the unified model matches, and on several metrics beats, specialized open-source and commercial systems, with the largest gains in object identity, temporal consistency, and motion dynamics. If that holds, a single deployable model could replace a collection of task-specific tools and share learned behaviors across tasks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unified dynamic content manipulation injection module. It classifies every user condition into image, mask, or pose channels; a latent-fusion tokenizer concatenates the latent encodings of the masked source video and the mask video and feeds the combined vector through a tokenizer initialized with the backbone's weights; PoseNet turns a pose video into tokens; and a fully connected layer aligns the resulting condition tokens to the noise-latent space before they are summed with the noisy video tokens. During training, dynamic routing randomly drops some conditions, which teaches the model to handle arbitrary condition combinations and improves single-condition editing. The second piece is the visual-text instruction module: a vision-language model receives instruction, text-prompt, and image-prompt tokens separated by markers, and the encoded reference image is placed at frame position $-1$ with a spatial shift, so identity information flows into the video through temporal attention without being copied verbatim. The system is trained with a flow-matching objective that predicts the velocity field from noise to video latent.

What would settle it

A third-party replication on the released benchmark with fixed random seeds, comparing the unified model against the same commercial and open baselines, plus a blind human audit of one hundred instruction-edit clips against human-made ground-truth edits, would settle both the parity claim and the circularity concern.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the inputs of diverse video tasks can be normalized into three signal types—image conditions, mask conditions, and pose conditions—and injected into a pretrained diffusion-transformer video generator through one module trained so that conditions can appear in any combination. The mask condition itself is two videos, a masked source and a binary mask, fused in latent space by a tokenizer that inherits pretrained weights; pose enters through a small network; and a fully connected layer maps both condition families into the noise-token space, where they are summed with the noisy video tokens. The text side is handled by a vision-language model whose tokens are split into instruction, text-prompt, and image-prompt parts separated by marker tokens, with the reference image embedded as a frame just before the video and shifted in position so the model uses it as identity rather than copying it. Trained first on mask-guided editing, then on instruction editing, then on pose fitting, the model is reported to match or exceed per-task baselines on a task-specific benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The instruction-edit swap pairs are generated by the authors' own mask-guided editor rather than by humans, so if that editor has systematic errors, the model's claimed instruction-following ability inherits them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deploying one set of weights could replace several task-specific video models, lowering training, storage, and serving costs for studios and platforms.
  • Because conditions are randomly dropped during training, the model can edit from a single mask, a single pose, or a text instruction alone, not only from all conditions at once.
  • Text-driven edits such as replacing a bus with a fire truck or adding a product to a table become possible without requiring the user to draw a mask.
  • Shared training across tasks acts as a data amplifier, since pairs produced for inpainting can be reused for object addition and replacement, reducing per-task data collection.
  • On the reported metrics, the largest improvements are in object identity and temporal consistency, the two properties that usually determine whether an edit is usable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The swap-task instruction pairs are generated by the authors' own mask-guided editor rather than by humans, so the claimed instruction-following ability is partly a measure of that editor; a human-annotated pair audit would reveal how much genuine understanding the model has.
  • If the three-channel injection and routing mechanism is the right abstraction, the same module could likely absorb new condition types such as depth maps, scribbles, or audio without rearchitecting the model.
  • The positional trick of placing the reference image at frame $-1$ with a spatial shift is a candidate general fix for reference copy-paste in any image-to-video system and could be isolated and tested on a simpler single-task setup.
  • The limitations the paper reports, small-object replacement failures and hand-interaction errors at mask boundaries, may trace back to the synthetic training pairs and mask augmentation choices, suggesting data-led rather than architecture-led fixes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes OmniV2V, a unified video-to-video generation and editing framework built on the HunyuanVideo DiT backbone, with a dynamic content manipulation injection module that fuses image, mask, and pose conditions and a LLaVA-based visual-text instruction module. It targets eight tasks, including object movement, object addition, mask-guided editing, try-on, inpainting/outpainting, human animation, and controllable character synthesis, and introduces a multi-task dataset and the OmniV2V-Test benchmark. The central claim is that OmniV2V performs as well as, and sometimes better than, the best open-source and commercial models across these tasks.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is a useful step toward replacing task-specific video editing systems with a single adaptable model, and the proposed latent token fusion and dynamic routing are interesting design choices. The paper also makes a practical contribution by describing a large-scale multi-task data processing pipeline and a benchmark. However, the current quantitative evidence is not strong enough to support the headline comparative claim: baseline comparisons are confounded, no statistical support is reported, part of the instruction-edit training data is generated by the model itself, and a key results statement is contradicted by Table 1. The architectural and ablation content is solid enough that these issues appear fixable within the scope of the manuscript.

major comments (6)
  1. [Section 6.2, Tables 1 and 3] The central comparative claim is not yet supported because the baseline comparisons are confounded. The manuscript itself states that Kling1.6 'processes the input video at a higher resolution, resulting in better visual perception' and that VACE1.3B's higher dynamic degree is 'mainly due to incomplete object removal during inpainting.' Since these confounds are acknowledged but no matched-resolution or corrected-metric comparison is provided, the FVD/CLIP/DINO differences in Tables 1 and 3 cannot be read as evidence that OmniV2V works as well as or better than the best existing models.
  2. [Tables 1-3, Section 4.2 user study] All quantitative results are single point estimates with no error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests, and the user study uses 30 participants with no per-dimension variance or inter-rater agreement. In several rows the metric gaps are small (e.g., CLIP-L 0.274 vs 0.274 in Table 1), so the claimed superiority requires either multiple evaluation seeds, confidence intervals, or a statistical test.
  3. [Section 4.1, Datasets] For the swap task in instruction editing, the training pairs are generated by the authors' own mask-guided video edit model: 'we can effectively use the trained mask-guided video edit model to generate pairs.' No human validation, quality filtering, or error analysis of these synthetic pairs is described. If the teacher model's mistakes are encoded into the training data, the instruction-edit results are partly circular and the claimed instruction-following ability is overstated.
  4. [Table 1 and Section 4.2] The text in Section 4.2 states that OmniV2V 'achieves the best performance in terms of FVD, object consistency, temporal consistency, and dynamic degree.' In the controllable character video synthesis block of Table 1, however, Mimo has DINO-sim 0.562 while OmniV2V has 0.553. Unless 'object consistency' refers only to Face-sim, this statement is contradicted by the table and needs to be corrected or qualified.
  5. [Sections 6.3 and 6.4] The training description is internally inconsistent. Section 6.3 states that the authors 'fully fine-tune the weights of both the pretrained video generation model and the LLaVA model,' while Section 6.4 says 'we keep the parameters of LLaVA and 3DVAE frozen, updating only all other parameters.' Please clarify which parameters are updated, since this affects reproducibility and the interpretation of the instruction module's contribution.
  6. [Section 4.1, OmniV2V-Test] The OmniV2V-Test benchmark is constructed by the authors, but no release mechanism, annotation protocol, or baseline inference configuration is described. Because the central comparison uses this benchmark, external reproducibility is currently impossible; the manuscript should state whether the benchmark and evaluation code will be released and should specify the exact inference settings used for each baseline.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 4.2] The name 'Keling' appears in the discussion after Table 1 and should be 'Kling'.
  2. [Figure 3] The caption contains the typo 'Adapter/Controlnnet'; it should be 'Adapter/ControlNet'.
  3. [Section 6.2] The text cites '[38]' for MimicMotion, but reference [38] is EchoMimicV2; the correct reference appears to be [59].
  4. [Table 3] The row for Kling1.6 has lost column separators in the SC/MD/VQ entries (e.g., '7.502.88 3.38'), which makes the table hard to read.
  5. [Section 4.1, Datasets] The sentence 'we can effectively use the before-and-after data from the inpainting task as pairs' should clarify how the before/after videos are aligned spatially and temporally to form valid addition-task pairs.
  6. [Section 6.3] The heading 'Preliminary' is misleading for a section that contains the core formulation and training loss; it should be renamed (e.g., 'Method details').
  7. [Equation (1)] The 'spatial shift' in Eq. (1) adds the full video width w and height h to the RoPE spatial indices; please clarify whether this is intentional and how it prevents copy-pasting while preserving positional coherence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the central comparative claim is tested against external baselines, while the noted self-referential elements (self-generated swap training pairs, HunyuanCustom/HunyuanVideo inheritance, and admitted evaluation confounds) are data-hygiene and validity concerns rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

OmniV2V is an engineering paper without a mathematical derivation chain that could reduce a prediction to its inputs. The main claim is comparative: 'OmniV2V works as well as, and sometimes better than, the best existing open-source and commercial models' (Abstract). That claim is evaluated against external systems (Kling 1.6, VACE 1.3B, Pika, Mimo, Mimicmotion, ProPainter) on the author-constructed OmniV2V-Test benchmark. The self-referential elements are real but not load-bearing in a circular sense. First, the instruction-edit swap training pairs are generated by the authors' own trained mask-guided video edit model (Section 4.1, Datasets: 'For the swap task in the instruction edit task, we can effectively use the trained mask-guided video edit model to generate pairs'). This is a legitimate training-data risk that can imprint the teacher's edit biases into the student, but it affects only the swap sub-task training distribution, and the paper does not state that the OmniV2V-Test evaluation pairs are generated by the same model. Second, the paper follows the same authors' HunyuanCustom for token separation ('we follow HunyuanCustom [20] and insert a <SEP> token between them', Section 3.2) and uses HunyuanVideo as backbone; these are architectural inheritance choices, and the ablations in Table 2 and Figures 6-7 test the new modules independently rather than relying on the cited works as proof. Third, Section 6.2 admits baseline comparison confounds (Kling's higher input resolution and VACE's dynamic degree from incomplete object removal), which weaken the empirical force of the 'sometimes better' claim but do not make the method circular. The paper's Limitations paragraph (Section 6.5) also concedes instruction-signal weakness and mask-boundary interaction failures. No quoted equation, fitted parameter, or benchmark construction is reused as its own prediction, so no pattern from the enumerated circularity kinds is exhibited. The appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a minor score only for the self-referential data-generation step and same-group citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on pretrained components (HunyuanVideo13B, LLaVA, 3D-VAE) and on a set of unproven design assumptions: that a shared token-fusion space can represent all task conditions, that random condition dropping is sufficient for arbitrary combinations, and that self-generated swap pairs are valid supervision. No free constants are fitted in a derivation; the model is trained end-to-end. No new physical or latent entities are invented; the new modules are compositions of existing components.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption HunyuanVideo13B provides a suitable base distribution and tokenizer for all task types.
    The entire framework initializes from HunyuanVideo13B (Section 6.4). If this backbone cannot represent tasks like try-on or outpainting, the unified claim fails.
  • domain assumption LLaVA token separation with <SEP> and image tokens placed at RoPE frame -1 yields meaningful instruction-image alignment.
    Adopted from HunyuanCustom [20]; the paper provides only qualitative ablations as support.
  • ad hoc to paper Randomly dropping conditional inputs during training teaches arbitrary condition combinations without catastrophic forgetting.
    This dynamic routing strategy is the core mechanism for unification (Section 3.1), but the paper provides only qualitative support.
  • ad hoc to paper Self-generated swap pairs from the trained mask-guided edit model are valid ground truth for instruction editing.
    Section 4.1 uses the authors' own model to generate training pairs; this is circular unless validated against human annotations.
  • standard math The flow-matching objective (Equation 3) with logit-normal timestep sampling is a correct training target for all tasks.
    This is standard for video diffusion; it is a background assumption rather than the weak point of the paper.
  • domain assumption DINO-v2 similarity computed on YOLOv11 human segments is a valid object-consistency measure for non-human objects.
    Section 4.1, Evaluation Metrics, describes human segmentation for 'object similarity', which may not suit object addition or removal tasks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of OmniV2V: Versatile Video Generation and Editing via Dynamic Content Manipulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MWYG777M

@misc{pith2026250601801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: OmniV2V: Versatile Video Generation and Editing via Dynamic Content Manipulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MWYG777M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01801}
}
read the original abstract

The emergence of Diffusion Transformers (DiT) has brought significant advancements to video generation, especially in text-to-video and image-to-video tasks. Although video generation is widely applied in various fields, most existing models are limited to single scenarios and cannot perform diverse video generation and editing through dynamic content manipulation. We propose OmniV2V, a video model capable of generating and editing videos across different scenarios based on various operations, including: object movement, object addition, mask-guided video edit, try-on, inpainting, outpainting, human animation, and controllable character video synthesis. We explore a unified dynamic content manipulation injection module, which effectively integrates the requirements of the above tasks. In addition, we design a visual-text instruction module based on LLaVA, enabling the model to effectively understand the correspondence between visual content and instructions. Furthermore, we build a comprehensive multi-task data processing system. Since there is data overlap among various tasks, this system can efficiently provide data augmentation. Using this system, we construct a multi-type, multi-scenario OmniV2V dataset and its corresponding OmniV2V-Test benchmark. Extensive experiments show that OmniV2V works as well as, and sometimes better than, the best existing open-source and commercial models for many video generation and editing tasks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01801 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. OmniV2V comprehensive capability demonstration. We showcase the excellent genera￾tion and editing results of OmniV2V, with the original input and the generated videos for each task displayed in the figure. Abstract The emergence of Diffusion Transformers (DiT) has brought significant advance￾ments to video generation, especially in text-to-video and image-to-video tasks. Although video generation is widely applied i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The framework of OmniV2V. It consists of two main modules: a unified information injec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three types of strategies for injecting pose information. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative of comparison on the wild dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of videos generated by OmniV2V on the wild dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation Study [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation study on the posenet. correspondence between visual content and text, we design a visual-text instruction module based on LLaVA. Given the numerous subtasks involved, we have developed a comprehensive multi-task data processing system. Since there is data over…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison with Mimo on the controllable character video synthesis task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative of comparison on instruction edit, outpainting and inpainting task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: More visualizations of mask-guided edit task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: More visualizations of controllable character video synthesis task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: More visualizations of outpainting and inpainting task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: More visualizations of human animation and instruction edit task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CustomX: Unified Character, Action, and Scene Customization in Video World Models

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AniX generates controllable videos of a user-supplied character performing typed actions inside a user-supplied 3D scene by fine-tuning a pre-trained video generator on small locomotion datasets.

  2. O-DisCo-Edit: Object Distortion Control for Unified Realistic Video Editing

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video editor trained on randomly distorted objects, then steered by adaptive noise at inference, is claimed to surpass dedicated and unified editors across eight tasks with far less training.

  3. PolyVivid: Vivid Multi-Subject Video Generation with Cross-Modal Interaction and Enhancement

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PolyVivid combines VLLM-based grounding, 3D-RoPE positional encoding, and attention-inherited identity injection to generate customized videos with multiple consistent subjects and text-specified interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. Bai, S. Bai, Y . Chu, Z. Cui, K. Dang, X. Deng, Y . Fan, W. Ge, Y . Han, F. Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Bar-Tal, H

    O. Bar-Tal, H. Chefer, O. Tov, C. Herrmann, R. Paiss, S. Zada, A. Ephrat, J. Hur, Y . Li, T. Michaeli, et al. Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12945, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Y . Bian, Z. Zhang, X. Ju, M. Cao, L. Xie, Y . Shan, and Q. Xu. Videopainter: Any-length video inpainting and editing with plug-and-play context control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05639, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Blattmann, T

    A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, S. Kulal, D. Mendelevitch, M. Kilian, D. Lorenz, Y . Levi, Z. English, V . V oleti, A. Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Blattmann, R

    A. Blattmann, R. Rombach, H. Ling, T. Dockhorn, S. W. Kim, S. Fidler, and K. Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22563–22575, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Brooks, J

    T. Brooks, J. Hellsten, M. Aittala, T.-C. Wang, T. Aila, J. Lehtinen, M.-Y . Liu, A. Efros, and T. Karras. Generating long videos of dynamic scenes.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:31769–31781, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    H. W. Chung, L. Hou, S. Longpre, B. Zoph, Y . Tay, W. Fedus, Y . Li, X. Wang, M. Dehghani, S. Brahma, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(70):1–53, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    J. Deng, J. Guo, N. Xue, and S. Zafeiriou. Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4690–4699, 2019

    2019

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    J. Deng, J. Guo, E. Ververas, I. Kotsia, and S. Zafeiriou. Retinaface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild. InCVPR, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Esser, S

    P. Esser, S. Kulal, A. Blattmann, R. Entezari, J. Müller, H. Saini, Y . Levi, D. Lorenz, A. Sauer, F. Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first international conference on machine learning, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    F. Fan, C. Guo, L. Gong, B. Wang, T. Ge, Y . Jiang, C. Luo, and J. Zhan. Hierarchical masked 3d diffusion model for video outpainting. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 7890–7900, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Z. Fang, W. Zhai, A. Su, H. Song, K. Zhu, M. Wang, Y . Chen, Z. Liu, Y . Cao, and Z.-J. Zha. Vivid: Video virtual try-on using diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11794, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Y . Gao, Y . Zhou, J. Wang, X. Li, X. Ming, and Y . Lu. High-fidelity and freely controllable talking head video generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5609–5619, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Y . Guo, C. Yang, A. Rao, Z. Liang, Y . Wang, Y . Qiao, M. Agrawala, D. Lin, and B. Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gupta, L

    A. Gupta, L. Yu, K. Sohn, X. Gu, M. Hahn, L. Fei-Fei, I. Essa, L. Jiang, and J. Lezama. Photorealistic video generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06662, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. Ho, T. Salimans, A. Gritsenko, W. Chan, M. Norouzi, and D. J. Fleet. Video diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:8633–8646, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    W. Hong, M. Ding, W. Zheng, X. Liu, and J. Tang. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022. 20

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    L. Hu. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8153–8163, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    L. Hu, G. Wang, Z. Shen, X. Gao, D. Meng, L. Zhuo, P. Zhang, B. Zhang, and L. Bo. Animate anyone 2: High-fidelity character image animation with environment affordance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06145, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    T. Hu, Z. Yu, Z. Zhou, S. Liang, Y . Zhou, Q. Lin, and Q. Lu. Hunyuancustom: A multimodal- driven architecture for customized video generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2505.04512

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Huang, Y

    Z. Huang, Y . He, J. Yu, F. Zhang, C. Si, Y . Jiang, Y . Zhang, T. Wu, Q. Jin, N. Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21807–21818, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Jiang, T

    J. Jiang, T. Wang, H. Yan, and J. Liu. Clothformer: Taming video virtual try-on in all module. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10799–10808, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Jiang, Z

    Z. Jiang, Z. Han, C. Mao, J. Zhang, Y . Pan, and Y . Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Keling.https://klingai.com/cn/, 2025

    Keling. Keling.https://klingai.com/cn/, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Khanam and M

    R. Khanam and M. Hussain. Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. Kim, G. Gu, M. Park, S. Park, and J. Choo. Stableviton: Learning semantic correspondence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8176–8185, 2024

    2024

  19. [28]

    W. Kong, Q. Tian, Z. Zhang, R. Min, Z. Dai, J. Zhou, J. Xiong, X. Li, B. Wu, J. Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    B. F. Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    2024

  21. [30]

    Y . Li, M. Min, D. Shen, D. Carlson, and L. Carin. Video generation from text. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018

    2018

  22. [31]

    Z. Li, J. Zhang, Q. Lin, J. Xiong, Y . Long, X. Deng, Y . Zhang, X. Liu, M. Huang, Z. Xiao, et al. Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08748, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    S. Lin, X. Xia, Y . Ren, C. Yang, X. Xiao, and L. Jiang. Diffusion adversarial post-training for one-step video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08316, 2025

    2025

  24. [33]

    Y . Lin, H. Fung, J. Xu, Z. Ren, A. S. Lau, G. Yin, and X. Li. Mvportrait: Text-guided motion and emotion control for multi-view vivid portrait animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19383, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Lipman, R

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le. Flow matching for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  26. [35]

    H. Liu, C. Li, Q. Wu, and Y . J. Lee. Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023. 21

    2023

  27. [36]

    Y . Liu, K. Zhang, Y . Li, Z. Yan, C. Gao, R. Chen, Z. Yuan, Y . Huang, H. Sun, J. Gao, et al. Sora: A review on background, technology, limitations, and opportunities of large vision models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Y . Men, Y . Yao, M. Cui, and L. Bo. Mimo: Controllable character video synthesis with spatial decomposed modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16160, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    R. Meng, X. Zhang, Y . Li, and C. Ma. Echomimicv2: Towards striking, simplified, and semi-body human animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10061, 2024

    2024

  30. [39]

    Oquab, T

    M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. V o, M. Szafraniec, V . Khalidov, P. Fernandez, D. Haziza, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Pika.https://pika.art/, 2025

    Pika. Pika.https://pika.art/, 2025

    2025

  32. [41]

    Pyscenedetect

    PySceneDetect. Pyscenedetect. https://github.com/Breakthrough/PySceneDetect, 2025

    2025

  33. [42]

    Radford, J

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PmLR, 2021

    2021

  34. [43]

    T. Ren, S. Liu, A. Zeng, J. Lin, K. Li, H. Cao, J. Chen, X. Huang, Y . Chen, F. Yan, Z. Zeng, H. Zhang, F. Li, J. Yang, H. Li, Q. Jiang, and L. Zhang. Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks, 2024

    2024

  35. [44]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022

    2022

  36. [45]

    Singer, A

    U. Singer, A. Polyak, T. Hayes, X. Yin, J. An, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, H. Yang, O. Ashual, O. Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Y . Tu, H. Luo, X. Chen, S. Ji, X. Bai, and H. Zhao. Videoanydoor: High-fidelity video object insertion with precise motion control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01427, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Villegas, M

    R. Villegas, M. Babaeizadeh, P.-J. Kindermans, H. Moraldo, H. Zhang, M. T. Saffar, S. Castro, J. Kunze, and D. Erhan. Phenaki: Variable length video generation from open domain textual descriptions. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  39. [48]

    A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, J. Zeng, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  40. [49]

    J. Wang, H. Yuan, D. Chen, Y . Zhang, X. Wang, and S. Zhang. Modelscope text-to-video technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Q. Wang, Y . Shi, J. Ou, R. Chen, K. Lin, J. Wang, B. Jiang, H. Yang, M. Zheng, X. Tao, et al. Koala-36m: A large-scale video dataset improving consistency between fine-grained conditions and video content.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08260, 2024

    arXiv

  42. [51]

    Y . Wang, P. Bilinski, F. Bremond, and A. Dantcheva. Imaginator: Conditional spatio-temporal gan for video generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1160–1169, 2020

    2020

  43. [52]

    Z. Xu, M. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Xing, Z. Zhai, N. Sang, J. Lan, S. Xiao, and C. Gao. Tunnel try-on: Excavating spatial-temporal tunnels for high-quality virtual try-on in videos. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 3199–3208, 2024

    2024

  44. [53]

    Z. Xu, Z. Yu, Z. Zhou, J. Zhou, X. Jin, F.-T. Hong, X. Ji, J. Zhu, C. Cai, S. Tang, et al. Hunyuanportrait: Implicit condition control for enhanced portrait animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18860, 2025. 22

    2025 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Z. Yang, A. Zeng, C. Yuan, and Y . Li. Effective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4210–4220, 2023

    2023

  46. [55]

    Z. Yang, J. Teng, W. Zheng, M. Ding, S. Huang, J. Xu, Y . Yang, W. Hong, X. Zhang, G. Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Zhang, A

    L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  48. [57]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Wang, Y . Zhang, K. Zhao, H. Yuan, Z. Qin, X. Wang, D. Zhao, and J. Zhou. I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Zhang, C

    S.-X. Zhang, C. Yang, X. Zhu, and X.-C. Yin. Arbitrary shape text detection via boundary transformer.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023

    2023

  50. [59]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Gu, L.-W. Wang, H. Wang, J. Cheng, Y . Zhu, and F. Zou. Mimicmotion: High- quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19680, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Zhong, Z

    X. Zhong, Z. Wu, T. Tan, G. Lin, and Q. Wu. Mv-ton: Memory-based video virtual try-on network. InProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 908–916, 2021

    2021

  52. [61]

    D. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Yan, W. Lv, Y . Zhu, and J. Feng. Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  53. [62]

    S. Zhou, C. Li, K. C. Chan, and C. C. Loy. Propainter: Improving propagation and transformer for video inpainting. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10477–10486, 2023

    2023

  54. [63]

    Y . Zhou, Q. Wang, Y . Cai, and H. Yang. Allegro: Open the black box of commercial-level video generation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15458, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  55. [64]

    S. Zhu, J. L. Chen, Z. Dai, Y . Xu, X. Cao, Y . Yao, H. Zhu, and S. Zhu. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2024

    2024

  56. [65]

    Zhuang, Z

    S. Zhuang, Z. Huang, B. Yang, Y . Zhang, F. Wang, C. Fu, C. Sun, Z.-J. Zha, C. Li, and Y . Wang. Get in video: Add anything you want to the video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06268, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  57. [66]

    B. Zi, S. Zhao, X. Qi, J. Wang, Y . Shi, Q. Chen, B. Liang, R. Xiao, K.-F. Wong, and L. Zhang. Cococo: Improving text-guided video inpainting for better consistency, controllability and compatibility. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.