Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

SOUL: Unlocking the Power of Second-Order Optimization for LLM Unlearning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.18239 v4 pith:N43FVOXR submitted 2024-04-28 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords unlearningsecond-orderinfluencesouldatamodeloptimizationeffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the necessity of effective unlearning mechanisms to comply with data regulations and ethical AI practices. LLM unlearning aims at removing undesired data influences and associated model capabilities without compromising utility beyond the scope of unlearning. While interest in studying LLM unlearning is growing, the impact of the optimizer choice for LLM unlearning remains unexplored. In this work, we shed light on the significance of optimizer selection in LLM unlearning for the first time, establishing a clear connection between second-order optimization and influence unlearning (a classical approach using influence functions to update the model for data influence removal). This insight propels us to develop a second-order optimization-based LLM unlearning framework, termed Second-Order UnLearning (SOUL), which extends the static, one-shot model update using influence unlearning to a dynamic, iterative unlearning process. Our extensive experiments show that SOUL consistently outperforms conventional first-order methods across various unlearning tasks, models, and metrics, indicating that second-order optimization offers an effective and broadly applicable solution for LLM unlearning. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/SOUL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maximizing Local Entropy Where It Matters: Prefix-Aware Localized LLM Unlearning

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PALU shows that unlearning only needs local intervention—the first few tokens of the sensitive span and the top-k logits—not full-sequence, full-vocabulary suppression.

  2. Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DiPO is a distribution-level unlearning method that constructs preference distributions from the model's own high-confidence logits and achieves state-of-the-art forget quality on TOFU while preserving utility.

  3. Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model Outputs

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Unlearning in LLMs leaves detectable 'fingerprints' that let a simple classifier distinguish an unlearned model from its original, even on unrelated prompts.

  4. Model Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder Subspace Guided Projections

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SSPU uses SAE-derived subspaces to guide weight updates, lowering WMDP-Cyber accuracy by 3.22% more than RMU while largely preserving MMLU, TruthfulQA, and GSM8K performance.

  5. GROM: Gradient-Free Rapid One-Shot Machine Unlearning

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single closed-form ridge update to selected MLP layers removes targeted knowledge from LLMs in seconds, with state-of-the-art forgetting-utility trade-offs and quantization robustness.

  6. Module-Aware Parameter-Efficient Machine Unlearning on Transformers

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MAPE-Unlearn uses Fisher-information-based scores and greedy search to select important heads and filters, then applies sparse unlearning updates, claiming improved efficacy-fidelity trade-offs on Transformers.

  7. Reliable Unlearning Harmful Information in LLMs with Metamorphosis Representation Projection

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM unlearning method that projects hidden states so harmful information is irreversibly removed while useful knowledge is preserved.

  8. UCD: Unlearning in LLMs via Contrastive Decoding

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    UCD steers an LLM away from forget-set content at inference time by mixing in the difference between forget-tuned and retain-tuned small models.

Pith tools