Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EffiBench-X: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Measuring Efficiency of LLM-Generated Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13004 v1 pith:N6YY7W57 submitted 2025-05-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords codeefficiencyeffibench-xpythonjavallm-generatedbenchmarkeffibench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing code generation benchmarks primarily evaluate functional correctness, with limited focus on code efficiency and often restricted to a single language like Python. To address this gap, we introduce EffiBench-X, the first multi-language benchmark designed to measure the efficiency of LLM-generated code. EffiBench-X supports Python, C++, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, and Golang. It comprises competitive programming tasks with human-expert solutions as efficiency baselines. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs on EffiBench-X reveals that while models generate functionally correct code, they consistently underperform human experts in efficiency. Even the most efficient LLM-generated solutions (Qwen3-32B) achieve only around \textbf{62\%} of human efficiency on average, with significant language-specific variations. LLMs show better efficiency in Python, Ruby, and JavaScript than in Java, C++, and Golang. For instance, DeepSeek-R1's Python code is significantly more efficient than its Java code. These results highlight the critical need for research into LLM optimization techniques to improve code efficiency across diverse languages. The dataset and evaluation infrastructure are submitted and available at https://github.com/EffiBench/EffiBench-X.git and https://huggingface.co/datasets/EffiBench/effibench-x.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RLPF: Reinforcement Learning from Performance Feedback for Code Generation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLPF's staged performance reward lifts Qwen3-32B on PerfCodeBench from 11.1% to 54.6% correct-and-runnable and from 8.1% to 38.6% relative efficiency.

  2. Rethinking Technology Stack Selection with AI Coding Proficiency

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI coding proficiency, a new measure of how effectively LLMs use a given library, reveals large quality gaps between competing Python libraries, with winners varying by model.

  3. SAGE:Specification-Aware Grammar Extraction for Automated Test Case Generation with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE combines supervised fine-tuning and GRPO reinforcement learning to generate CCFG grammars from competitive programming specs, achieving 96.66% set-based validity and 80.67% set-based effectiveness on 240 held-out...

Pith tools