Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding polysemanticity in neural networks through coding theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17975 v1 pith:NAUCVCQC submitted 2024-01-31 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords networkinterpretabilitycodeneuralneuronsapproachexplainsinsights
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite substantial efforts, neural network interpretability remains an elusive goal, with previous research failing to provide succinct explanations of most single neurons' impact on the network output. This limitation is due to the polysemantic nature of most neurons, whereby a given neuron is involved in multiple unrelated network states, complicating the interpretation of that neuron. In this paper, we apply tools developed in neuroscience and information theory to propose both a novel practical approach to network interpretability and theoretical insights into polysemanticity and the density of codes. We infer levels of redundancy in the network's code by inspecting the eigenspectrum of the activation's covariance matrix. Furthermore, we show how random projections can reveal whether a network exhibits a smooth or non-differentiable code and hence how interpretable the code is. This same framework explains the advantages of polysemantic neurons to learning performance and explains trends found in recent results by Elhage et al.~(2022). Our approach advances the pursuit of interpretability in neural networks, providing insights into their underlying structure and suggesting new avenues for circuit-level interpretability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mammo-SAE: Interpreting Breast Cancer Concept Learning with Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoders trained on Mammo-CLIP features expose a small set of concept-aligned and confounding latent neurons in breast cancer predictions.

  2. SAFR: Neuron Redistribution for Interpretability

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAFR regularizes a transformer so that important tokens become monosemantic (one neuron per meaning) and correlated tokens share neurons, and it uses the accuracy drop after deleting high-capacity tokens as its interp...

Pith tools