Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unbiased Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo for Gibbs samplers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04407 v3 pith:NH3MYGPS submitted 2024-03-07 math.NA cs.NA

classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords mcmcunbiasedcarlomcqmcgibbsmethodratechain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In statistical analysis, Monte Carlo (MC) stands as a classical numerical integration method. When encountering challenging sample problem, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is a commonly employed method. However, the MCMC estimator is biased after a fixed number of iterations. Unbiased MCMC, an advancement achieved through coupling techniques, addresses this bias issue in MCMC. It allows us to run many short chains in parallel. Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), known for its high order of convergence, is an alternative of MC. By incorporating the idea of QMC into MCMC, Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo (MCQMC) effectively reduces the variance of MCMC, especially in Gibbs samplers. This work presents a novel approach that integrates unbiased MCMC with MCQMC, called as an unbiased MCQMC method. This method renders unbiased estimators while improving the rate of convergence significantly. Numerical experiments demonstrate that for Gibbs sampling, unbiased MCQMC with a sample size of $N$ yields a faster root mean square error (RMSE) rate than the \(O(N^{-1/2})\) rate of unbiased MCMC, toward an RMSE rate of \(O(N^{-1})\) for low-dimensional problems. Surprisingly, in a challenging problem of 1049-dimensional P\'olya Gamma Gibbs sampler, the RMSE can still be reduced by several times for moderate sample sizes. In the setting of parallelization, unbiased MCQMC also performs better than unbiased MCMC, even running with short chains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Error estimation for quasi-Monte Carlo

    math.NA 2024-12 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of uncertainty quantification for quasi-Monte Carlo that recommends Student's t intervals from at least 10 randomized replicates and identifies near-symmetry of RQMC errors as a promising but unproven basis f...

Pith tools