Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 200 references

AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A cross-domain map of AI-generated content: trends, challenges, and a research agenda

desk verdict Useful broad-strokes survey of AIGC's cross-domain impact, but citation errors and an unsystematic reference base need fixing before I'd rely on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.11151 v1 pith:NHEDYKHJ submitted 2025-09-14 cs.AI

Jianxin Li , Liang Qu , Taotao Cai , Zhixue Zhao , Nur Al Hasan Haldar , Aneesh Krishna , Xiangjie Kong , Flavio Romero Macau
show 8 more authors
Tanmoy Chakraborty Aniket Deroy Binshan Lin Karen Blackmore Nasimul Noman Jingxian Cheng Ningning Cui Jianliang Xu
This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords AI-generatedcontentlargelanguagemodelsdetectionmisinformationspreadpublictrustdigitalmarketinghealthdatasovereignty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This vision paper argues that AI-generated content (AIGC) has grown powerful and widespread enough to reshape how information is made, spread, and trusted across many fields, yet most research still looks at individual domains in isolation. To close that gap, the authors bring together scholars from multiple disciplines to synthesize what is known about AIGC's technical foundations, its detection, its spread through digital platforms, and its societal impacts on public trust, marketing, health, organizations, and education. They also identify persistent technical challenges and propose a set of research propositions meant to guide future work. A sympathetic reader would take this as a useful orientation for a fragmented field, and as a call to treat AIGC not just as a tool but as a trust-sensitive, sovereignty-sensitive technology.

What carries the argument

The organizing framework is a two-stage generative AI pipeline—pre-training, fine-tuning, and prompt-based utilization—which the paper uses to anchor its review of detection, spread, and domain impacts. The proposed research agenda relies on a set of named mechanisms and paradigms: the 'Bad Actor, Good Advisor' approach (large language models as reasoning advisors to specialized detectors), tool-using fact-checking agents (e.g., FacTool, LEMMA), explainable reasoning frameworks (e.g., ProgramFC, TELLER), transformation-resilient watermarking, and trust-by-design. These are presented as modular building blocks for future cross-domain solutions.

What would settle it

A systematic review of AIGC research that follows a documented search protocol and finds that a major domain or a significant body of work is missing from the paper's synthesis would call the cross-domain perspective into question. Alternatively, a benchmark showing that the proposed 'LLM as advisor' detection approach performs no better than fine-tuned small models on multimodal adversarial inputs would weaken a key proposition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a cross-domain perspective on AIGC reveals a small number of recurring dynamics: an escalating arms race between generative models and detection systems, platform algorithms that amplify synthetic content regardless of origin, trust erosion that varies by domain but follows common patterns, and unresolved trade-offs between data sovereignty, security, and model functionality. On this basis, the paper proposes research directions such as LLM-assisted detection frameworks (e.g., the 'bad actor, good advisor' paradigm), provenance-preserving generation and watermarking, spread-aware governance, trust-by-design system building, and privacy-aware training. The au

Load-bearing premise

The overview and its research propositions rest on the assumption that the informally selected collection of studies and expert opinions fairly represents each domain's current research landscape, even though no systematic search or inclusion criteria are stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the cross-domain synthesis is correct, AIGC research should shift from single-modality, single-platform detection toward integrated, multimodal, and spread-aware frameworks.
  • The proposed 'LLM as advisor' paradigm, if validated, would make large language models a standard component of detection pipelines rather than the final classifier.
  • Provenance-preserving generation and watermarking, if made transformation-robust, could give platforms a practical way to label and trace synthetic content across sharing chains.
  • Trust-centric design, if adopted, would change how AIGC systems are evaluated: perceived transparency and fairness would join accuracy as first-class metrics.
  • The sovereignty-functionality trade-off, if unresolved, could limit the global scaling of generative models, pushing training and deployment toward regional or federated designs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The paper's proposition that culture-aware and health-literacy-aware content generation should be a research priority implies a testable prediction: models fine-tuned on low-resource languages and local infrastructure data will produce measurably more actionable advice than purely English-centric models.
  • Editorial inference: The 'arms race' framing suggests that no static detection benchmark will remain valid for long; the community may need continuously updated adversarial benchmark suites, analogous to those used in computer security.
  • Editorial inference: If the spread-velocity differential between AI-generated and human-generated content is as large as the paper suggests, then platform-level detection integrated into recommender systems could be more effective than post-hoc moderation, a claim that could be tested with controlled field experiments.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's emphasis on trust as a cross-cutting concern implies that future AIGC governance may be organized around domain-specific trust thresholds (e.g., high for health, lower for entertainment), rather than a single global policy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This vision paper offers a narrative, cross-disciplinary review of AI-generated content (AIGC). It covers generative-model training and prompting (Section 2), content generation and detection (Section 3), spread and use (Section 4), and societal impacts in public trust, digital marketing, public health, organizational behavior, and education (Sections 5–9), followed by data sovereignty and security risks (Section 10). The paper claims to bridge a gap by assembling 16 scholars from multiple disciplines and offers research propositions in most sections. The intended contribution is a broad synthesis rather than a formal systematic review.

Significance. If the evidence base were dependable, this would be a useful interdisciplinary entry point: it consolidates technical detection/provenance work with domain-specific trust- and ethics-centered findings, and it formulates concrete, testable research propositions (e.g., Section 8.3's hybrid human-AI content creation hypotheses; Section 7.3's health-literacy alignment questions). The multi-author breadth and accessible organization are genuine strengths. However, because the paper is a non-systematic narrative review, its value is conditional on accurate citation of canonical results and a representative reference base; as shown below, that condition is not currently met.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The sentence 'False information spreads up to six times faster than truthful news [25]' is a concrete misattribution. Reference [25] is J. Su et al., 'Adapting fake news detection to the era of large language models' (arXiv:2311.04917); that work does not establish the six-times statistic, which is the well-known result from Vosoughi et al. (Science, 2018) and is not cited anywhere in the paper. Because this sentence is the key motivation for the detection section, the misattribution is not cosmetic.
  2. [Section 3.1] The sentence describing 'propagation-aware graph transformers [42]' maps to Ref. [42], M. Zhou, 'AI-generated learning material in education' (2024), which is unrelated. The intended citation is presumably Ref. [36], Zhu et al., 'Propagation Structure-Aware Graph Transformer...' (SIGKDD 2024). This indicates a systematic reference-mapping issue that should be audited across the whole reference list.
  3. [Sections 3–10 (overall method)] The abstract claims to provide 'a cross-domain perspective on the trends and challenges of AIGC' and the paper derives research propositions from the reviewed literature, yet Sections 3–10 state no search strategy, inclusion criteria, or selection protocol for the references. Without this, the overview cannot be checked for representativeness, and the propositions built on the selection lose evidential grounding. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  4. [Sections 4 and 10] In a review with no explicit selection protocol, the heavy clusters of self-citations (e.g., [58]–[60] in Section 4.1, [192]–[196] in Section 10.2) are a concern. They may be legitimate examples, but the absence of selection criteria makes it impossible to rule out citation bias; the authors should either justify why these clusters are representative or replace them with a broader set of independent works.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, 3.4, 2.1, 10] Typos and spacing issues: 'primarily challenge', 'attaks', and 'artifaxts' in Section 3.2; 'landsape' in Section 3.4; 'V AEs' in Section 2.1; 'GPDR' in Section 10 should be 'GDPR'.
  2. [Sections 4.3–4.4] The abbreviation 'AIGI' is used without definition; define it at first use or replace with 'AIGC'.
  3. [Section 5.4] Section 5.4 labels the paper an 'opinion paper', while the abstract calls it a 'vision paper'; the genre labels should be aligned.
  4. [References] Several entries are inconsistent or incomplete (e.g., [26] lacks a date; some arXiv and report entries are missing version information). A reference cleanup is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a narrative review with no derivation chain that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper makes no predictions from fitted parameters and contains no equations; its contribution is a synthesized overview and a set of forward-looking research propositions. The self-citation clusters ([9]-[11] in the GAN discussion, [52]-[53] in the LLM-agent discussion, [58]-[60] for recommender systems, and [192]-[196] for federated learning) are used as illustrative references for established topics rather than as premises that force the paper's conclusions. The proposition sections (3.3, 4.3, 5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3, 9.3, 10.3) are framed as research directions or testable hypotheses, not as results derived from the authors' own prior work. The statement in Section 3 that 'False information spreads up to six times faster than truthful news [25]' misattributes a well-known result from Vosoughi et al. (Science, 2018) to reference [25]; this is a citation-integrity and correctness concern, but it is not circular because the statistic is not derived from [25] or from any model or equation in the paper. No step in the paper equates an input with an output by construction, so the circularity burden is very low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper, so no free parameters are fitted and no new theoretical entities are introduced. The central claims rest on the fidelity of the literature synthesis, the correctness of cited statistics, and the representativeness of the informally selected sources. The three axioms listed capture those load-bearing dependencies.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The statistic that false information spreads up to six times faster than truthful news is accurate as cited.
    Invoked in Section 3 to argue that AIGC accelerates disinformation; the paper does not verify the number and attaches it to reference [25], which is not the original empirical study.
  • domain assumption The cited papers, more than 200 references, are accurately summarized and representative of each domain's literature.
    The central overview relies on secondary synthesis, yet no systematic protocol or selection criteria are stated, so the accuracy and representativeness of the chosen references is assumed.
  • domain assumption The authors' research propositions are grounded in the cited literature rather than personal opinion.
    Sections 5 to 10 present propositions without empirical validation; their relevance and completeness rest on the adequacy of the underlying literature selection and on the collective expertise of the 16 authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NHEDYKHJ

@misc{pith2026250911151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NHEDYKHJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.11151}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) has rapidly emerged with the capability to generate different forms of content, including text, images, videos, and other modalities, which can achieve a quality similar to content created by humans. As a result, AIGC is now widely applied across various domains such as digital marketing, education, and public health, and has shown promising results by enhancing content creation efficiency and improving information delivery. However, there are few studies that explore the latest progress and emerging challenges of AIGC across different domains. To bridge this gap, this paper brings together 16 scholars from multiple disciplines to provide a cross-domain perspective on the trends and challenges of AIGC. Specifically, the contributions of this paper are threefold: (1) It first provides a broader overview of AIGC, spanning the training techniques of Generative AI, detection methods, and both the spread and use of AI-generated content across digital platforms. (2) It then introduces the societal impacts of AIGC across diverse domains, along with a review of existing methods employed in these contexts. (3) Finally, it discusses the key technical challenges and presents research propositions to guide future work. Through these contributions, this vision paper seeks to offer readers a cross-domain perspective on AIGC, providing insights into its current research trends, ongoing challenges, and future directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.11151 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the generative AI training and utilization pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. AI-Generated Video Of Trump Kissing Elon Musk’s Feet Reportedly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Examples comparing human-crafted ad titles and AI-generated ad titles for online shopping platform [119]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of generating diverse advertising image backgrounds using di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

200 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    J. Su, C. Cardie, P. Nakov, Adapting fake news detection to the era of large language models, arXiv:2311.04917 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  2. [42]

    Zhou, Ai-generated learning material in education, AI in Education Review (2024)

    M. Zhou, Ai-generated learning material in education, AI in Education Review (2024)

    2024

  3. [58]

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, L. Qu, Q. V . H. Nguyen, J. Li, H. Yin, Hide your model: A parameter transmission-free federated recommender sys- tem, in: 2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), IEEE, 2024, pp. 611–624

    2024

  4. [60]

    J. Li, K. Deng, J. Li, Y . Ren, Session-oriented fairness-aware recommen- dation via dual temporal convolutional networks, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2024)

    2024

  5. [192]

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, L. Qu, G. Ye, Q. V . H. Nguyen, H. Yin, Robust fed- erated contrastive recommender system against model poisoning attack, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20107 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [196]

    W. Yuan, C. Yang, L. Qu, Q. V . Hung Nguyen, G. Ye, H. Yin, Ptf-fsr: A parameter transmission-free federated sequential recommender system, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 43 (2) (2025) 1–24

    2025

  7. [36]

    J. Zhu, C. Gao, Z. Yin, X. Li, J. Kurths, Propagation structure-aware graph transformer for robust and interpretable fake news detection, in: SIGKDD 2024

    2024

  8. [1]

    Knill, S

    K. Knill, S. Young, Hidden markov models in speech and language pro- cessing, in: Corpus-based Methods in Language and Speech Processing, Springer, 1997, pp. 27–68

    1997

Show all 200 references
  1. [2]

    Reynolds, Gaussian mixture models, in: Encyclopedia of Biometrics, Springer, 2015, pp

    D. Reynolds, Gaussian mixture models, in: Encyclopedia of Biometrics, Springer, 2015, pp. 827–832

    2015

  2. [3]

    Bengio, R

    Y . Bengio, R. Ducharme, P. Vincent, C. Jauvin, A neural probabilistic language model, Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Feb) (2003) 1137–1155

    2003

  3. [4]

    Mikolov, M

    T. Mikolov, M. Karafiát, L. Burget, J. Cernock `y, S. Khudanpur, Re- current neural network based language model., in: Interspeech, V ol. 2, Makuhari, 2010, pp. 1045–1048

    2010

  4. [5]

    Graves, Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Net- works, 2012.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2

    A. Graves, Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Net- works, 2012.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2

    2012 doi

  5. [6]

    R. Dey, F. M. Salem, Gate-variants of gated recurrent unit (gru) neural networks, in: 2017 IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1597–1600

    2017

  6. [7]

    D. P. Kingma, M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  7. [8]

    Goodfellow, J

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y . Bengio, Generative adversarial networks, Communications of the ACM 63 (11) (2020) 139–144

    2020

  8. [9]

    S. Ho, Y . Qu, B. Gu, L. Gao, J. Li, Y . Xiang, Dp-gan: Differentially pri- vate consecutive data publishing using generative adversarial nets, Jour- nal of Network and Computer Applications 185 (2021) 103066

    2021

  9. [10]

    S. Ho, Y . Qu, L. Gao, J. Li, Y . Xiang, Generative adversarial nets en- hanced continual data release using differential privacy, in: International Conference on Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing, Springer, 2019, pp. 418–426

    2019

  10. [11]

    L. Qu, H. Zhu, R. Zheng, Y . Shi, H. Yin, Imgagn: Imbalanced network embedding via generative adversarial graph networks, in: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2021, pp. 1390–1398

    2021

  11. [12]

    Y . Song, S. Ermon, Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019)

    2019

  12. [13]

    Vaswani, N

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  13. [14]

    W. X. Zhao, K. Zhou, J. Li, T. Tang, X. Wang, Y . Hou, Y . Min, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Dong, et al., A survey of large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223 1 (2) (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  14. [15]

    Brown, B

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al., Language mod- els are few-shot learners, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020) 1877–1901

    2020

  15. [16]

    Touvron, L

    H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y . Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, et al., Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  16. [17]

    Ouyang, J

    L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, et al., Training language mod- els to follow instructions with human feedback, Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems 35 (2022) 27730–27744

    2022

  17. [18]

    Glaese, N

    A. Glaese, N. McAleese, M. Tr˛ ebacz, J. Aslanides, V . Firoiu, T. Ewalds, M. Rauh, L. Weidinger, M. Chadwick, P. Thacker, et al., Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14375 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  18. [19]

    J. D. M.-W. C. Kenton, L. K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidi- rectional transformers for language understanding, in: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171–4186

    2019

  19. [20]

    Huang, Y

    Y . Huang, Y . Cheng, A. Bapna, O. Firat, D. Chen, M. Chen, H. Lee, J. Ngiam, Q. V . Le, Y . Wu, et al., Gpipe: Efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019)

    2019

  20. [21]

    Shoeybi, M

    M. Shoeybi, M. Patwary, R. Puri, P. LeGresley, J. Casper, B. Catanzaro, Megatron-lm: Training multi-billion parameter language models using model parallelism, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08053 (2019)

    1909 arXiv

  21. [22]

    V . Liu, L. B. Chilton, Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to- image generative models, in: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2022, pp. 1–23

    2022

  22. [23]

    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V . Le, D. Zhou, et al., Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022) 24824–24837

    2022

  23. [24]

    A. Loth, M. Kappes, M.-O. Pahl, Blessing or curse? a survey on the impact of generative ai on fake news, arXiv:2404.03021 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [26]

    Christopher, N

    F. Christopher, N. Nicholas, N. Madeleine, D. Karoun, Fake video of trump and musk appears on tvs at housing agency, The New York Times. URLhttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/24/us/politics/ musk-trump-toes-video.html

    2025

  25. [27]

    C. Chen, K. Shu, Can llm-generated misinformation be detected?, arXiv 18 preprint arXiv:2309.13788 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  26. [28]

    S. K. Hamed, M. J. Ab Aziz, M. R. Yaakub, A review of fake news detec- tion approaches: A critical analysis of relevant studies and highlighting key challenges associated with the dataset, feature representation, and data fusion, Heliyon 9 (10) (2023)

    2023

  27. [29]

    S. V . Balshetwar, A. Rs, D. J. R, Fake news detection in social me- dia based on sentiment analysis using classifier techniques, Multimedia tools and applications 82 (23) (2023) 35781–35811

    2023

  28. [30]

    X. Zhou, J. Li, Q. Li, R. Zafarani, Linguistic-style-aware neural net- works for fake news detection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02792 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  29. [31]

    Mahyoob, J

    M. Mahyoob, J. Al-Garaady, M. Alrahaili, Linguistic-based detection of fake news in social media, Forthcoming, International Journal of English Linguistics 11 (1) (2020)

    2020

  30. [32]

    L. Wei, D. Hu, W. Zhou, Z. Yue, S. Hu, Towards propagation uncer- tainty: Edge-enhanced bayesian graph convolutional networks for rumor detection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.11934 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  31. [33]

    Meyers, G

    M. Meyers, G. Weiss, G. Spanakis, Fake news detection on twitter using propagation structures, in: Multidisciplinary International Symposium on Disinformation in Open Online Media, Springer, 2020, pp. 138–158

    2020

  32. [34]

    C. Yuan, Q. Ma, W. Zhou, J. Han, S. Hu, Early detection of fake news by utilizing the credibility of news, publishers, and users based on weakly supervised learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04233 (2020)

    2012 arXiv

  33. [35]

    L. Wu, L. Wang, Y . Zhao, Unified evidence enhancement inference framework for fake news detection, in: IJCAI 2024

    2024

  34. [37]

    Z. Ma, M. Luo, H. Guo, Z. Zeng, Y . Hao, X. Zhao, Event-radar: Event- driven multi-view learning for multimodal fake news detection, in: Pro- ceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics (V olume 1: Long Papers), 2024, pp. 5809–5821

    2024

  35. [38]

    L. Zong, J. Zhou, W. Lin, X. Liu, X. Zhang, B. Xu, Unveiling opinion evolution via prompting and diffusion for short video fake news detec- tion, in: ACL 2024

    2024

  36. [39]

    H. Liu, W. Wang, H. Li, H. Li, TELLER: A trustworthy framework for explainable, generalizable and controllable fake news detection, in: ACL 2024

    2024

  37. [40]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Zhou, X. Zhang, S. Wang, P. S. Yu, C. Li, Early detection of multimodal fake news via reinforced propagation path gen- eration, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 37 (2) (2025) 613–625

    2025

  38. [41]

    B. Hu, Q. Sheng, J. Cao, Y . Shi, Y . Li, D. Wang, P. Qi, Bad actor, good advisor: Exploring the role of large language models in fake news de- tection, in: AAAI 2024

    2024

  39. [43]

    J. Wu, J. Guo, B. Hooi, Fake news in sheep’s clothing: Robust fake news detection against llm-empowered style attacks, in: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 3367–3378

    2024

  40. [44]

    Akhtar, M

    M. Akhtar, M. Schlichtkrull, Z. Guo, O. Cocarascu, E. Simperl, A. Vla- chos, Multimodal automated fact-checking: A survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13507 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  41. [45]

    Z. Guo, M. Schlichtkrull, A. Vlachos, A survey on automated fact- checking, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 10 (2022) 178–206

    2022

  42. [46]

    B. Yao, A. Shah, L. Sun, J.-H. Cho, L. Huang, End-to-end multimodal fact-checking and explanation generation: A challenging dataset and models, in: SIGIR, 2023, pp. 2733–2743

    2023

  43. [47]

    Manakul, A

    P. Manakul, A. Liusie, M. J. Gales, Selfcheckgpt: Zero-resource black- box hallucination detection for generative large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08896 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  44. [48]

    Muhammed, G

    D. Muhammed, G. Rabby, S. Auer, Selfcheckagent: Zero-resource hal- lucination detection in generative large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01812 (2025)

    2025

  45. [49]

    S. Park, X. Du, M.-H. Yeh, H. Wang, Y . Li, Steer llm latents for halluci- nation detection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01917 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [50]

    Azaria, T

    A. Azaria, T. Mitchell, The internal state of an llm knows when it’s lying, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13734 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [51]

    Hosseini, H

    S. Hosseini, H. Seilani, The role of agentic ai in shaping a smart future: A systematic review, Array (2025) 100399

    2025

  48. [52]

    Z. Liu, J. Li, Y . Huang, N. Cui, L. Pei, Knowledge-based natural answer generation via effective graph learning, Knowledge-Based Systems 316 (2025) 113288

    2025

  49. [53]

    Z. Li, X. Wang, J. Zhao, W. Guo, J. Li, Hycube: Efficient knowledge hypergraph 3d circular convolutional embedding, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2025)

    2025

  50. [54]

    Chern, S

    I. Chern, S. Chern, S. Chen, W. Yuan, K. Feng, C. Zhou, J. He, G. Neu- big, P. Liu, et al., Factool: Factuality detection in generative ai–a tool augmented framework for multi-task and multi-domain scenarios, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13528 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  51. [55]

    K. Xuan, L. Yi, F. Yang, R. Wu, Y . R. Fung, H. Ji, Lemma: towards lvlm- enhanced multimodal misinformation detection with external knowledge augmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11943 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  52. [56]

    L. Pan, X. Wu, X. Lu, A. T. Luu, W. Y . Wang, M.-Y . Kan, P. Nakov, Fact-checking complex claims with program-guided reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12744 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  53. [57]

    H. Liu, W. Wang, H. Li, H. Li, Teller: A trustworthy framework for explainable, generalizable and controllable fake news detection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07776 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [59]

    Y . Chen, Y . Li, X. Huang, Y . Wang, G. Zhu, G. Min, J. Li, An explain- able recommendation method for artificial intelligence of things based on reinforcement learning with knowledge graph inference, IEEE Trans- actions on Consumer Electronics (2024)

    2024

  55. [61]

    Cillo, G

    P. Cillo, G. Rubera, Generative ai in innovation and marketing processes: A roadmap of research opportunities, Journal of the Academy of Mar- keting Science (2024) 1–18

    2024

  56. [62]

    Reisenbichler, T

    M. Reisenbichler, T. Reutterer, D. A. Schweidel, D. Dan, Supporting content marketing with natural language generation, Marketing Science 41 (3) (2022) 441–452

    2022

  57. [63]

    X. Chen, W. Feng, Z. Du, W. Wang, Y . Chen, H. Wang, L. Liu, Y . Li, J. Zhao, Y . Li, et al., Ctr-driven advertising image generation with mul- timodal large language models, in: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 2025, pp. 2262–2275

    2025

  58. [64]

    Sharma, F

    K. Sharma, F. Qian, T. Jiang, N. Ruchansky, M. Zhang, Y . Liu, Combat- ing online misinformation: A survey of algorithms and systems, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 13 (2) (2022) 1–42

    2022

  59. [65]

    Horta Ribeiro, J

    M. Horta Ribeiro, J. Blackburn, B. Bradlyn, E. D. Cristofaro, S. Zannet- tou, G. Stringhini, The spread of misinformation on online platforms: A case study of cross-platform diffusion, in: Proceedings of the Interna- tional AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2021

    2021

  60. [66]

    Uchendu, T

    A. Uchendu, T. Le, K. Shu, D. Lee, Turingbench: A benchmark envi- ronment for detecting machine-generated text, in: Findings of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics (EMNLP Findings), 2021, pp. 4271–4285

    2021

  61. [67]

    Krishna, R

    K. Krishna, R. Y . Pang, E. Nijkamp, Y . Zhou, G. Neubig, Z. C. Lipton, M. Sachan, Paraphrasing elicits structural changes that evade machine- generated text detectors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13408 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Liang, R

    P. Liang, R. Bommasani, et al., Gpt detectors are biased against non- native english writers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13662 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Mitchell, Y

    E. Mitchell, Y . Lee, A. Khazatsky, P. Isola, C. D. Manning, C. Finn, Detectgpt: Zero-shot machine-generated text detection using probability curvature, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11305 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Neekhara, B

    P. Neekhara, B. Dolhansky, R. Howes, Y . Bitton, J. Pan, J. C. Wang, N. Baram, C. C. Ferrer, S. Warfield, A. Finkelstein, Adversarial per- turbations for exposing and resisting deepfakes, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 20...

    2021

  65. [71]

    Y . Li, X. Yang, P. Sun, H. Qi, S. Lyu, Celeb-df: A large-scale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 3207– 3216

    2020

  66. [72]

    Jiang, R

    L. Jiang, R. Li, W. Wu, C. Qian, C. C. Loy, Deeperforensics-1.0: A large-scale dataset for real-world face forgery detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, 2020, pp. 2889–2898. 19

    2020

  67. [73]

    Y . Wen, M. Gharbi, T. Park, R. Zhang, J.-Y . Zhu, T. Zhang, Tree-ring watermarks: Invisible fingerprints for diffusion images, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11179 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  68. [74]

    Kirchenbauer, J

    J. Kirchenbauer, J. Geiping, Y . Wen, J. Katz-Samuels, T. Goldstein, I. Alabdulmohsin, F. Tramèr, I. Shumailov, A watermark for large lan- guage models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10226 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  69. [75]

    Carlini, M

    N. Carlini, M. Jagielski, K. Lee, F. Tramèr, D. Ippolito, Others, On the robustness of watermarking to text transformations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08495 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Z. Ji, N. Lee, et al., Survey of hallucination in natural language genera- tion, ACM Computing Surveys (2023)

    2023

  71. [77]

    Z. Zhao, N. Aletras, Comparing explanation faithfulness between mul- tilingual and monolingual fine-tuned language models, in: K. Duh, H. Gomez, S. Bethard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguis- ti...

    2024

  72. [78]

    D. G. Takale, P. N. Mahalle, B. Sule, Exploring watermarking tech- niques in generative ai: A brief overview, Journal of Image Processing and Artificial Intelligence 10 (3) (2024) 1–5

    2024

  73. [79]

    T. Lancaster, Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and chat- gpt–does digital watermarking offer a solution?, International Journal for Educational Integrity 19 (1) (2023) 10

    2023

  74. [80]

    X. Chen, N. Wang, Rumor spreading model considering rumor credibil- ity, correlation and crowd classification based on personality, Scientific reports 10 (1) (2020) 5887

    2020

  75. [81]

    T. Zhou, H. Lu, The effect of trust on user adoption of ai-generated con- tent, The Electronic Library 43 (1) (2025) 61–76

    2025

  76. [82]

    Battista, Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: an overview of deepfakes and their implications, Society Register 8 (2) (2024) 7–24

    D. Battista, Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: an overview of deepfakes and their implications, Society Register 8 (2) (2024) 7–24

    2024

  77. [83]

    T. P. Quinn, M. Senadeera, S. Jacobs, S. Coghlan, V . Le, Trust and med- ical ai: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 28 (4) (2021) 890–894

    2021

  78. [84]

    C. Zhai, S. Wibowo, L. D. Li, The effects of over-reliance on ai di- alogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review, Smart Learning Environments 11 (1) (2024) 28

    2024

  79. [85]

    K. J. Schiff, D. Schiff, N. S. Bueno, The liar’s dividend: How deepfakes and fake news affect politician support and trust in media (2020)

    2020

  80. [86]

    Gilardi, S

    F. Gilardi, S. Di Lorenzo, J. Ezzaini, B. Santa, B. Streiff, E. Zurfluh, E. Hoes, Willingness to read ai-generated news is not driven by their perceived quality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03500 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  81. [87]

    Gilardi, S

    F. Gilardi, S. Di Lorenzo, J. Ezzaini, B. Santa, B. Streiff, E. Zurfluh, E. Hoes, Disclosure of ai-generated news increases engagement but does not reduce aversion, despite positive quality ratings, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv–2409

    2024

  82. [88]

    Romero-Moreno, Deepfake detection in generative ai: A legal frame- work proposal to protect human rights, Computer Law & Security Re- view 58 (2025) 106162

    F. Romero-Moreno, Deepfake detection in generative ai: A legal frame- work proposal to protect human rights, Computer Law & Security Re- view 58 (2025) 106162

    2025

  83. [89]

    Romero Moreno, Generative ai and deepfakes: a human rights ap- proach to tackling harmful content, International review of law, comput- ers & technology 38 (3) (2024) 297–326

    F. Romero Moreno, Generative ai and deepfakes: a human rights ap- proach to tackling harmful content, International review of law, comput- ers & technology 38 (3) (2024) 297–326

    2024

  84. [90]

    Hadan, D

    H. Hadan, D. M. Wang, R. H. Mogavi, J. Tu, L. Zhang-Kennedy, L. E. Nacke, The great ai witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (mis) con- ception of generative ai in research writing, Computers in Human Be- havior: Artificial Humans 2 (2) (2024) 100095

    2024

  85. [91]

    Wittenberg, Z

    C. Wittenberg, Z. Epstein, G. Péloquin-Skulski, A. J. Berinsky, D. G. Rand, Labeling ai-generated media online, PNAS nexus 4 (6) (2025) pgaf170

    2025

  86. [92]

    M. B. E. Islam, M. Haseeb, H. Batool, N. Ahtasham, Z. Muhammad, Ai threats to politics, elections, and democracy: a blockchain-based deep- fake authenticity verification framework, Blockchains 2 (4) (2024) 458– 481

    2024

  87. [93]

    Romanishyn, O

    A. Romanishyn, O. Malytska, V . Goncharuk, Ai-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic resilience, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8 (2025) 1569115

    2025

  88. [94]

    W. Duan, S. Zhou, M. J. Scalia, G. Freeman, J. Gorman, M. Tolston, N. J. McNeese, G. Funke, Understanding the processes of trust and dis- trust contagion in human–ai teams: A qualitative approach, Computers in Human Behavior 165 (2025) 108560

    2025

  89. [95]

    G. A. Sanna, D. Lagnado, Belief updating in the face of misinformation: The role of source reliability, Cognition 258 (2025) 106090

    2025

  90. [96]

    Bajwa, U

    J. Bajwa, U. Munir, A. Nori, B. Williams, Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine, Future healthcare journal 8 (2) (2021) e188–e194

    2021

  91. [97]

    Longoni, A

    C. Longoni, A. Bonezzi, C. K. Morewedge, Resistance to medical arti- ficial intelligence, Journal of consumer research 46 (4) (2019) 629–650

    2019

  92. [98]

    Y .-N. K. Chen, C.-H. R. Wen, Impacts of attitudes toward government and corporations on public trust in artificial intelligence, Communica- tion Studies 72 (1) (2021) 115–131

    2021

  93. [99]

    E. N. Naumova, Who is responsible for ai-generated public health poli- cies?, Journal of public health policy 44 (4) (2023) 517–522

    2023

  94. [100]

    Amann, A

    J. Amann, A. Blasimme, E. Vayena, D. Frey, V . I. Madai, P. Consor- tium, Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidis- ciplinary perspective, BMC medical informatics and decision making 20 (1) (2020) 310

    2020

  95. [101]

    J. W. Ayers, A. Poliak, M. Dredze, E. C. Leas, Z. Zhu, J. B. Kelley, D. J. Faix, A. M. Goodman, C. A. Longhurst, M. Hogarth, et al., Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient ques- tions posted to a public social media forum, JAMA internal me...

    2023

  96. [102]

    Nadarzynski, O

    T. Nadarzynski, O. Miles, A. Cowie, D. Ridge, Acceptability of artificial intelligence (ai)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study, Digital health 5 (2019) 2055207619871808

    2019

  97. [103]

    Haverkamp, J

    W. Haverkamp, J. Tennenbaum, N. Strodthoff, Chatgpt fails the test of evidence-based medicine, European Heart Journal-Digital Health 4 (5) (2023) 366–367

    2023

  98. [104]

    Kumthekar, Z

    A. Kumthekar, Z. Tilley, H. Duong, B. Patel, M. Magnoli, A. Omar, A. Nasser, C. Gharpure, Y . Reztzov, Second opinion matters: Towards adaptive clinical ai via the consensus of expert model ensemble, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23075 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  99. [105]

    M. H. Jarrahi, C. Lutz, G. Newlands, Artificial intelligence, human in- telligence and hybrid intelligence based on mutual augmentation, Big Data & Society 9 (2) (2022) 20539517221142824

    2022

  100. [106]

    X. L. Q. Wang, W. Guan, Research on the application of aigc in the gen- eration of personalized learning content for college students, in: New Paradigm in Digital Classroom and Smart Learning: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Classroom and Smart Learning-...

    2024

  101. [107]

    Cheng, T

    Y . Cheng, T. Wang, The impact of aigc on modern education: Trans- forming learning and teaching methods, in: 2024 International Con- ference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  102. [108]

    R. F. Kizilcec, E. Huber, E. C. Papanastasiou, A. Cram, C. A. Makridis, A. Smolansky, S. Zeivots, C. Raduescu, Perceived impact of generative ai on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in aus- tralia, cyprus, and the united states, Computers and Education: ...

    2024

  103. [109]

    J. M. Lodge, The evolving risk to academic integrity posed by generative artificial intelligence: Options for immediate action, Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency 8 (2024)

    2024

  104. [110]

    S. A. Bin-Nashwan, M. Sadallah, M. Bouteraa, Use of chatgpt in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance, Technology in So- ciety 75 (2023) 102370

    2023

  105. [111]

    Huang, C

    Q. Huang, C. Lv, L. Lu, S. Tu, Evaluating the quality of ai-generated digital educational resources for university teaching and learning, Sys- tems 13 (3) (2025) 174

    2025

  106. [112]

    so what if chatgpt wrote it?

    Y . K. Dwivedi, N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, E. L. Slade, A. Jeyaraj, A. K. Kar, A. M. Baabdullah, A. Koohang, V . Raghavan, M. Ahuja, et al., Opinion paper:“so what if chatgpt wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conv...

    2023

  107. [113]

    D. R. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, J. R. Shipway, Chatting and cheating: En- suring academic integrity in the era of chatgpt, Innovations in education and teaching international 61 (2) (2024) 228–239

    2024

  108. [114]

    D. Lee, M. Arnold, A. Srivastava, K. Plastow, P. Strelan, F. Ploeckl, D. Lekkas, E. Palmer, The impact of generative ai on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6 (2024) 100221

    2024

  109. [115]

    Chaffey, F

    D. Chaffey, F. Ellis-Chadwick, Digital marketing, Pearson uk, 2019

    2019

  110. [116]

    M. Bala, D. Verma, A critical review of digital marketing, International 20 Journal of Management, IT and Engineering 8 (10) (2018) 321–339

    2018

  111. [117]

    K. G. Nalbant, S. Aydin, A bibliometric approach to the evolution of ar- tificial intelligence in digital marketing, International Marketing Review (2025)

    2025

  112. [118]

    C. Reed, M. Wynn, R. Bown, Artificial intelligence in digital marketing: Towards an analytical framework for revealing and mitigating bias, Big Data and Cognitive Computing 9 (2) (2025) 40

    2025

  113. [119]

    Y . Chen, Z. Ren, Q. Gao, J. Chen, S. Chen, X. Li, T. Ge, B. Zheng, Ctr- driven ad text generation via online feedback preference optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20227 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  114. [120]

    J. W. Hughes, K.-h. Chang, R. Zhang, Generating better search engine text advertisements with deep reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge dis- covery & data mining, 2019, pp. 2269–2277

    2019

  115. [121]

    Z. Lei, C. Zhang, X. Xu, W. Wu, Z.-Y . Niu, H. Wu, H. Wang, Y . Yang, S. Li, Plato-ad: a unified advertisement text generation framework with multi-task prompt learning, in: Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: industry track,...

    2022

  116. [122]

    P. Wei, X. Yang, S. Liu, L. Wang, B. Zheng, Creater: Ctr-driven adver- tising text generation with controlled pre-training and contrastive fine- tuning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08943 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  117. [123]

    Reisenbichler, T

    M. Reisenbichler, T. Reutterer, D. A. Schweidel, D. Dan, Frontiers: Sup- porting content marketing with natural language generation, Marketing Science 41 (3) (2022) 441–452

    2022

  118. [124]

    Hartmann, Y

    J. Hartmann, Y . Exner, S. Domdey, The power of generative marketing: Can generative ai create superhuman visual marketing content?, Interna- tional Journal of Research in Marketing 42 (1) (2025) 13–31

    2025

  119. [125]

    Islam, A

    T. Islam, A. Miron, M. Nandy, J. Choudrie, X. Liu, Y . Li, Transforming digital marketing with generative ai. computers, 13 (7), 168 (2024)

    2024

  120. [126]

    Islam, A

    T. Islam, A. Miron, X. Liu, Y . Li, Svton: Simplified virtual try-on, in: 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Ap- plications (ICMLA), IEEE, 2022, pp. 369–374

    2022

  121. [127]

    Islam, A

    T. Islam, A. Miron, X. Liu, Y . Li, Fashionflow: leveraging diffusion models for dynamic fashion video synthesis from static imagery, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00106 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  122. [128]

    K. Zhao, X. Zhao, Z. Jin, Y . Yang, W. Tao, C. Han, S. Li, L. Liu, Enhanc- ing baidu multimodal advertisement with chinese text-to-image genera- tion via bilingual alignment and caption synthesis, in: Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and D...

    2024

  123. [129]

    Yu, Y .-F

    T. Yu, Y .-F. Zhang, C. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lu, K. Wang, X. Lu, Y . Shen, G. Zhang, D. Song, et al., Aligning multimodal llm with human pref- erence: A survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14504 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  124. [130]

    W. Wang, X. Lin, F. Feng, X. He, T.-S. Chua, Generative recommen- dation: Towards personalized multimodal content generation, in: Com- panion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 2025, pp. 2421–2425

    2025

  125. [131]

    Y . Xu, J. Zhang, A. Salemi, X. Hu, W. Wang, F. Feng, H. Zamani, X. He, T.-S. Chua, Personalized generation in large model era: A survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02614 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  126. [132]

    M. Mita, S. Murakami, A. Kato, P. Zhang, Striking gold in advertising: Standardization and exploration of ad text generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12030 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  127. [133]

    Murakami, P

    S. Murakami, P. Zhang, H. Kamigaito, H. Takamura, M. Okumura, Adparaphrase v2. 0: Generating attractive ad texts using a preference- annotated paraphrase dataset, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20826 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  128. [134]

    Branda, M

    F. Branda, M. Stella, C. Ceccarelli, F. Cabitza, G. Ceccarelli, A. Maruotti, M. Ciccozzi, F. Scarpa, The role of ai-based chatbots in public health emergencies: A narrative review, Future Internet 17 (4) (2025) 145

    2025

  129. [135]

    Z. Xie, Who is spreading ai-generated health rumors? a study on the association between aigc interaction types and the willing- ness to share health rumors, Social Media+Society 11 (1) (2025) 20563051251323391

    2025

  130. [136]

    D. Y . Ozdemir, M. Ayvaci, A. Zentner, What people think of machines as doctors: Unveiling the value of gen-ai for e-health, Available at SSRN 4765222 (2025)

    2025

  131. [137]

    Lehtimäki, Navigating ethical and practical challenges in ai- driven visual content creation (2024)

    M.-L. Lehtimäki, Navigating ethical and practical challenges in ai- driven visual content creation (2024)

    2024

  132. [138]

    Goktas, A

    P. Goktas, A. Grzybowski, Shaping the future of healthcare: ethical clinical challenges and pathways to trustworthy ai, Journal of Clinical Medicine 14 (5) (2025) 1605

    2025

  133. [139]

    I. V . Pantic, S. Mugosa, Artificial intelligence strategies based on ran- dom forests for detection of ai-generated content in public health, Public Health 242 (2025) 382–387

    2025

  134. [140]

    Augenstein, T

    I. Augenstein, T. Baldwin, M. Cha, T. Chakraborty, G. L. Ciampaglia, D. Corney, R. DiResta, E. Ferrara, S. Hale, A. Halevy, et al., Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact- checking, Nature Machine Intelligence 6 (8) (2024) 852–863

    2024

  135. [141]

    Sallam, Chatgpt utility in healthcare education, research, and prac- tice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid con- cerns, in: Healthcare, V ol

    M. Sallam, Chatgpt utility in healthcare education, research, and prac- tice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid con- cerns, in: Healthcare, V ol. 11, MDPI, 2023, p. 887

    2023

  136. [142]

    Aneja, A

    U. Aneja, A. Gupta, A. Vashistha, Beyond semantics: Examining gen- der bias in llms deployed within low-resource contexts in india, in: Pro- ceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2025, pp. 2784–2795

    2025

  137. [143]

    Tripathi, D

    S. Tripathi, D. Alkhulaifat, M. Muppuri, A. Elahi, F. Dako, Large lan- guage models for global health clinics: Opportunities and challenges, Journal of the American College of Radiology (2025)

    2025

  138. [144]

    Esmaeilzadeh, Use of ai-based tools for healthcare purposes: a sur- vey study from consumers’ perspectives, BMC medical informatics and decision making 20 (1) (2020) 170

    P. Esmaeilzadeh, Use of ai-based tools for healthcare purposes: a sur- vey study from consumers’ perspectives, BMC medical informatics and decision making 20 (1) (2020) 170

    2020

  139. [145]

    H. Yu, P. Guo, A. Sano, Zero-shot ecg diagnosis with large language models and retrieval-augmented generation, in: Machine learning for health (ML4H), PMLR, 2023, pp. 650–663

    2023

  140. [146]

    Mohamed, M

    E. Mohamed, M. H. Abbasher, M. A. Mohamed, Navigating the ethical horizon: Artificial intelligence-generated content and the imperative for transparency and ethics (2024)

    2024

  141. [147]

    Agunlejika, Ai-driven fact-checking in journalism: Enhancing infor- mation veracity and combating misinformation: A systematic review, Available at SSRN 5122225 (2025)

    T. Agunlejika, Ai-driven fact-checking in journalism: Enhancing infor- mation veracity and combating misinformation: A systematic review, Available at SSRN 5122225 (2025)

    2025

  142. [148]

    M. Omar, V . Sorin, R. Agbareia, D. U. Apakama, A. Soroush, A. Sakhuja, R. Freeman, C. R. Horowitz, L. D. Richardson, G. N. Nad- karni, et al., Evaluating and addressing demographic disparities in medi- cal large language models: a systematic review, International Journal for ...

    2025

  143. [149]

    J. A. Rodriguez, E. Alsentzer, D. W. Bates, Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 31 (9) (2024) 2147–2150

    2024

  144. [150]

    Z. A. Nazi, W. Peng, Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A review, in: Informatics, V ol. 11, MDPI, 2024, p. 57

    2024

  145. [151]

    O. R. Okonji, K. Yunusov, B. Gordon, Applications of generative ai in healthcare: algorithmic, ethical, legal and societal considerations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10632 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  146. [152]

    A. S. George, T. Baskar, D. Pandey, Establishing global ai accountabil- ity: Training data transparency, copyright, and misinformation, Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication 2 (3) (2024) 75–91

    2024

  147. [153]

    Haupt, J

    M. Haupt, J. Freidank, A. Haas, Consumer responses to human-ai col- laboration at organizational frontlines: strategies to escape algorithm aversion in content creation, Review of Managerial Science 19 (2) (2025) 377–413

    2025

  148. [154]

    A. M. French, J. Shim, From artificial intelligence to augmented intel- ligence: A shift in perspective, application, and conceptualization of ai, Information Systems Frontiers (2024) 1–22

    2024

  149. [155]

    Tsamados, L

    A. Tsamados, L. Floridi, M. Taddeo, Human control of ai systems: from supervision to teaming, AI and Ethics (2024) 1–14

    2024

  150. [156]

    Fenwick, G

    A. Fenwick, G. Molnar, P. Frangos, The critical role of hrm in ai-driven digital transformation: a paradigm shift to enable firms to move from ai implementation to human-centric adoption, Discover Artificial Intel- ligence 4 (1) (2024) 34

    2024

  151. [157]

    O’Higgins, H

    B. O’Higgins, H. Fatorachian, Consumer trust in artificial intelligence in the uk and ireland’s personal care and cosmetics sector, Cogent Business & Management 12 (1) (2025) 2469765

    2025

  152. [158]

    Y . Chen, H. Wang, S. R. Hill, B. Li, Consumer attitudes toward ai- generated ads: Appeal types, self-efficacy and ai’s social role, Journal of Business Research 185 (2024) 114867

    2024

  153. [159]

    Frenkenberg, G

    A. Frenkenberg, G. Hochman, It’s scary to use it, it’s scary to refuse it: the psychological dimensions of ai adoption—anxiety, motives, and dependency, Systems 13 (2) (2025) 82

    2025

  154. [160]

    H. Lu, Y . Wang, L. Ge, S. Ma, Positive effects of negative disclo- sure: The persuasive power of negative ai-generated content in shaping 21 consumer product attitude., Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 26 (3) (2025)

    2025

  155. [161]

    R. Jain, A. Kumar, Artificial intelligence in marketing: Two decades review, NMIMS Management Review 32 (2) (2024) 75–83

    2024

  156. [162]

    B. Yue, H. Li, The impact of human-ai collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribu- tion, Frontiers in psychology 14 (2023) 1277861

    2023

  157. [163]

    Bezuidenhout, T

    C. Bezuidenhout, T. Heffernan, R. Abbas, M. Mehmet, The impact of artificial intelligence on the marketing practices of professional services firms, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 31 (4) (2023) 516–537

    2023

  158. [164]

    Hossain, M

    S. Hossain, M. Fernando, S. Akter, Digital leadership: Towards a dy- namic managerial capability perspective of artificial intelligence-driven leader capabilities, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 32 (2) (2025) 189–208

    2025

  159. [165]

    J. M. Parker, K. W. James, B. R. Leggett, M. Al-Shammari, The first 25 years of digital marketing education research: A thematic exploration and an agenda for future inquiry, Journal of Marketing Education 46 (3) (2024) 240–257.doi:10.1177/02734753231212212

    2024 doi

  160. [166]

    Grewal, A

    D. Grewal, A. Guha, C. B. Satornino, M. Becker, The future of mar- keting and marketing education, Journal of Marketing Education 47 (1) (2025) 61–77.doi:10.1177/02734753241269838

    2025 doi

  161. [167]

    Richter, M

    S. Richter, M. Giroux, I. Piven, H. Sima, P. Dodd, A constructivist approach to integrating AI in marketing education: Bridging theory and practice, Journal of Marketing Education 47 (2) (2025) 94–111. doi:10.1177/02734753241288876

    2025 doi

  162. [168]

    A. R. McAlister, S. Alhabash, J. Yang, Artificial intelligence and chat- gpt: Exploring current and potential future roles in marketing education, Journal of Marketing Communications 30 (2) (2024) 166–187

    2024

  163. [169]

    Narang, V

    U. Narang, V . Sachdev, R. Liu, When AI wears many hats: The role of generative artificial intelligence in marketing education, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 44 (3) (2025) 473–489.doi:10.1177/ 07439156251328237

    2025

  164. [170]

    M. Ding, S. Dong, R. Grewal, Generative AI and usage in marketing classroom, Customer Needs and Solutions 11 (1) (2024) 5

    2024

  165. [171]

    O. A. Acar, Commentary: Reimagining marketing education in the age of generative AI, International journal of research in marketing 41 (3) (2024) 489–495

    2024

  166. [172]

    A. Guha, D. Grewal, S. Atlas, Generative AI and marketing education: What the future holds, Journal of Marketing Education 46 (1) (2024) 6–17

    2024

  167. [173]

    B. B. Schlegelmilch, A. J. Mills, Artificial intelligence and the future of marketing education, Journal of Marketing Education 47 (2) (2025) 91–93

    2025

  168. [174]

    J. Xia, M. Li, Y . Tang, S. Yang, Course map learning with graph convo- lutional network based on aucm, World Wide Web 26 (5) (2023) 3483– 3502

    2023

  169. [175]

    Golda, K

    A. Golda, K. Mekonen, A. Pandey, A. Singh, V . Hassija, V . Chamola, B. Sikdar, Privacy and security concerns in generative ai: a comprehen- sive survey, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 48126–48144

    2024

  170. [176]

    Manduchi, K

    L. Manduchi, K. Pandey, C. Meister, R. Bamler, R. Cotterell, S. Däubener, S. Fellenz, A. Fischer, T. Gärtner, M. Kirchler, et al., On the challenges and opportunities in generative ai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00025 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  171. [177]

    Feretzakis, K

    G. Feretzakis, K. Papaspyridis, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, V . S. Verykios, Privacy-preserving techniques in generative ai and large language mod- els: a narrative review, Information 15 (11) (2024) 697

    2024

  172. [178]

    Y . Liu, J. Huang, Y . Li, D. Wang, B. Xiao, Generative ai model privacy: a survey, Artificial Intelligence Review 58 (1) (2024) 33

    2024

  173. [179]

    T. Zhu, D. Ye, W. Wang, W. Zhou, P. S. Yu, More than privacy: Applying differential privacy in key areas of artificial intelligence, IEEE Transac- tions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34 (6) (2020) 2824–2843

    2020

  174. [180]

    N. Wu, C. Peng, K. Niu, A privacy-preserving game model for local dif- ferential privacy by using information-theoretic approach, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 216741–216751

    2020

  175. [181]

    Sattler, S

    F. Sattler, S. Wiedemann, K.-R. Müller, W. Samek, Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-iid data, IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 31 (9) (2019) 3400–3413

    2019

  176. [182]

    Zhang, C

    Q. Zhang, C. Xin, H. Wu, Privacy-preserving deep learning based on multiparty secure computation: A survey, IEEE Internet of Things Jour- nal 8 (13) (2021) 10412–10429

    2021

  177. [183]

    Chaudhury, H

    S. Chaudhury, H. Roy, S. Mishra, T. Yamasaki, Adversarial training time attack against discriminative and generative convolutional models, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 109241–109259

    2021

  178. [184]

    Vasan, M

    D. Vasan, M. Alazab, S. Venkatraman, J. Akram, Z. Qin, Mthael: Cross- architecture iot malware detection based on neural network advanced en- semble learning, IEEE Transactions on Computers 69 (11) (2020) 1654– 1667

    2020

  179. [185]

    W. Zhao, S. Alwidian, Q. H. Mahmoud, Adversarial training methods for deep learning: A systematic review, Algorithms 15 (8) (2022) 283

    2022

  180. [186]

    Bandi, P

    A. Bandi, P. V . S. R. Adapa, Y . E. V . P. K. Kuchi, The power of generative ai: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges, Future Internet 15 (8) (2023) 260

    2023

  181. [187]

    Ohm, Focusing on fine-tuning: Understanding the four pathways for shaping generative ai, Science and Technology Law Review 25 (2) (2024)

    P. Ohm, Focusing on fine-tuning: Understanding the four pathways for shaping generative ai, Science and Technology Law Review 25 (2) (2024)

    2024

  182. [188]

    Shivaani, G

    V . Shivaani, G. Muthupandi, et al., A review of generative ai in recom- mendation systems, in: 2025 International Conference on Data Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  183. [189]

    Li, et al., Data risk and data compliance governance for generative artificial intelligence, Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science 8 (3) (2025) 79–86

    Z. Li, et al., Data risk and data compliance governance for generative artificial intelligence, Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science 8 (3) (2025) 79–86

    2025

  184. [190]

    A. Ray, J. Tirrell, A. Sayers, From assimilation to autonomy: Rethinking data sovereignty in the age of large language models, Technical Commu- nication Quarterly (2025) 1–20

    2025

  185. [191]

    Ragothaman, Y

    K. Ragothaman, Y . Wang, D. Zeng, J. Liu, B. Rimal, Access control policy generation for iot using deep generative models, in: 2025 IEEE 22nd Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–8

    2025

  186. [193]

    Zheng, L

    R. Zheng, L. Qu, T. Chen, L. Cui, Y . Shi, H. Yin, Decentralized collab- orative learning with adaptive reference data for on-device poi recom- mendation, in: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 3930–3939

    2024

  187. [194]

    Zheng, L

    R. Zheng, L. Qu, T. Chen, K. Zheng, Y . Shi, H. Yin, Poisoning decen- tralized collaborative recommender system and its countermeasures, in: Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Re- search and Development in Information Retrieval, 2024, pp. 1712–1721

    2024

  188. [195]

    L. Qu, W. Yuan, R. Zheng, L. Cui, Y . Shi, H. Yin, Towards personal- ized privacy: User-governed data contribution for federated recommen- dation, in: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 3910–3918

    2024

  189. [197]

    van den Burg, C

    G. van den Burg, C. Williams, On memorization in probabilistic deep generative models, Advances in neural information processing systems 34 (2021) 27916–27928

    2021

  190. [198]

    Carlini, J

    N. Carlini, J. Hayes, M. Nasr, M. Jagielski, V . Sehwag, F. Tramer, B. Balle, D. Ippolito, E. Wallace, Extracting training data from diffu- sion models, in: 32nd USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 23), 2023, pp. 5253–5270

    2023

  191. [199]

    Somepalli, V

    G. Somepalli, V . Singla, M. Goldblum, J. Geiping, T. Goldstein, Dif- fusion art or digital forgery? investigating data replication in diffusion models, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 6048–6058

    2023

  192. [200]

    M. Nasr, N. Carlini, J. Hayase, M. Jagielski, A. F. Cooper, D. Ippolito, C. A. Choquette-Choo, E. Wallace, F. Tramèr, K. Lee, Scalable extrac- tion of training data from (production) language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17035 (2023). 22

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.