Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Semi-Homogeneous Sheaves and Twisted Derived Categories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For torsors under abelian varieties, twisted derived equivalence partners are exactly moduli spaces of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves.

desk verdict A serious paper with a real converse theorem, but the headline classification is conditional on a characteristic-0 input and Theorem D is misstated. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10274 v1 pith:NJDVG5HS submitted 2024-11-15 math.AG

Tyler Lane This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AG MSC 14F0814K0514F2214D20
keywords twistedderivedcategoriessemi-homogeneoussheavesmodulispacesofabelianvarietiestorsorsintegraltransformsBrauergroupequivalencecriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper classifies, geometrically, which smooth projective varieties can be derived equivalent to a fixed torsor under an abelian variety, allowing the target category to be twisted by a cohomological obstruction. For an $A$-torsor $X$, the moduli space $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves on $X$ with fixed numerical Chern character $\xi$ is again a torsor under an abelian variety, and its universal sheaf induces a twisted derived equivalence $\mathrm{D}^b(\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k},\mu^{-1})\to\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ with $\mu$ the universal obstruction. The paper proves the converse in a large class of cases, including all untwisted equivalences: if $Y$ is smooth projective and $\mathrm{D}^b(Y,\mu^{-1})\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(X)$, then under mild hypotheses $Y$ is one of these moduli spaces and $\mu$ is the universal obstruction. Hence, for two torsors under abelian varieties, twisted derived equivalence is equivalent to being the other's semi-homogeneous-sheaf moduli space. The author also derives a twisted analogue of the standard derived-equivalence criterion for abelian varieties over algebraically closed fields, expressed in terms of Lagrangian subvarieties of $A\times\hat A$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the moduli space $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves on a torsor $X$, cut out by fixing the numerical Chern character $\xi$. The stabilizer $S(F)$ of a point sheaf under the natural $A\times\hat A$-action is a $g$-dimensional abelian subvariety; the common stabilizer $S(\xi)$ is Lagrangian in the symplectic product $A\times\hat A$, and its quotient $A(\xi)=(A\times\hat A)/S(\xi)$ acts simply transitively, making $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ a torsor. The proof of the equivalence runs through a twisted full-faithfulness criterion (Theorem A.40): the universal sheaf's fibers satisfy the required Ext-vanishing and Ext-dimension conditions, Grothendieck duality and Serre functors turn full faithfulness into an equivalence, and the converse uses the classification result [dJO22, Theorem 1.1] together with deformation theory from [HP24] to identify the fibers of a given equivalence kernel as simple semi-homogeneous sheaves.

What would settle it

Over an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic, take a simple object $E\in\mathrm{D}^b(A)$ on an abelian variety of dimension $g$ with $\dim\operatorname{Ext}^i(E,E)=\binom{g}{i}$ for $i=0,1$, and compute the dimension of its stabilizer under the $A\times\hat A$-action. If this stabilizer has dimension $<g$, then the classification result used for the converse fails outside characteristic 0, and Theorem 2.4's general statement loses its support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the family of moduli spaces $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves on an $A$-torsor $X$ parametrizes its twisted derived equivalence partners. A sheaf is simple semi-homogeneous when it is simple and its stabilizer under the $A\times\hat A$-action on the moduli stack of simple sheaves has dimension $g=\dim X$; such sheaves have the same self-Ext dimensions as a skyscraper sheaf, and any two with the same numerical Chern character have no extensions between them. The paper shows each nonempty $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ is itself a torsor under the abelian variety $A(\xi)=(A\times\hat A)/S(\xi)$, carries a universal obstruction $\mu$, and the universal twisted sheaf $E$ defines an integral transform $\Phi_E:\mathrm{D}^b(\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k},\mu^{-1})\to\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ that is an equivalence. Conversely, under the hypotheses of Theorem 2.4, any twisted derived equivalence $\Phi_E:\mathrm{D}^b(Y,\mu^{-1})\to\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ forces $Y$ to be isomorphic to $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$, with $\mu$ the universal obstruction and $E$ a shift of the universal sheaf. Combined, these two directions give the iff statement of Corollary 2.8: for two torsors $X,Y$ under abelian varieties, $\mathrm{D}^b(Y,\mu^{-1})\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ exactly when $Y$ is a moduli space of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves on $X$ and $\mu$ is universal.

Load-bearing premise

The converse direction rests on a characteristic-0 theorem, noted by the author as possibly unnecessary, that any simple object whose self-extensions have the same dimensions as those of a structure sheaf is, up to shift, a simple semi-homogeneous sheaf; the forward direction also leans on a cited deformation-theoretic proposition whose proof is not included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every smooth projective twisted partner $Y$ of a torsor $X$ that falls under one of the three hypotheses in Theorem 2.4 is itself a torsor under an abelian variety, isomorphic to $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ for some numerical Chern character $\xi$.
  • All untwisted derived equivalences $\mathrm{D}^b(Y)\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ between a torsor and a smooth projective variety force $Y$ to be a fine moduli space of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves on $X$.
  • For two torsors $X$ and $Y$ under abelian varieties, $\mathrm{D}^b(Y,\mu^{-1})\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(X)$ holds exactly when $Y$ is a moduli space $\mathrm{SSH}^\xi_{X/k}$ and $\mu$ is the universal obstruction; no other twisted partners occur.
  • Over algebraically closed fields, the twisted analogue of the usual abelian-variety criterion holds: $\mathrm{D}^b(B,\beta^{-1})\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(A)$ iff $B$ is isomorphic to a Lagrangian abelian subvariety of $A\times\hat A$.
  • Any isometric isomorphism between $A\times\hat A$ and $B\times\hat B$ produces, for every $A$-torsor $X$, a $B$-torsor $Y$ and a twisted equivalence with obstruction in $\mathrm{Br}_1(Y)$; over finite fields this yields untwisted derived equivalence $\mathrm{D}^b(B)\simeq\mathrm{D}^b(A)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the characteristic-0 hypothesis in the cited classification result is removable, the converse becomes unconditional for every smooth projective $Y$; a positive answer would upgrade Theorem 2.4 to a bijection between twisted equivalence kernels and moduli spaces.
  • The stabilizer map $\xi\mapsto S(\xi)$ embeds the classification of twisted partners into the symplectic geometry of $A\times\hat A$; enumerating Lagrangian abelian subvarieties that occur as stabilizers would yield an explicit count of derived-equivalence partners of a given torsor.
  • The paper leaves open whether every isometric isomorphism of $A\times\hat A$ is realized by a derived equivalence between torsors; a natural test is whether adding Galois-equivariance to the isometry repairs the failure exhibited in its Example 4.4.
  • Over finite fields, Proposition 4.7 predicts untwisted derived equivalence from isometric isomorphisms; since derived equivalent varieties share zeta functions, this gives a numerical check: compute the zeta functions of $A$ and $B$ for such an isometry and compare.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves that for a torsor X under an abelian variety, the moduli space SSH^ξ_{X/k} of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves with fixed numerical Chern character carries a universal obstruction μ, and the universal (twisted) sheaf induces a twisted derived equivalence D^b(SSH^ξ_{X/k}, μ^{-1}) → D^b(X) (Theorem A / Theorem 2.1). It then proves a partial converse: under extra hypotheses—characteristic 0, or μ ∈ Br_1(Y), or Y itself a torsor under an abelian variety—any twisted derived equivalence D^b(Y, μ^{-1}) → D^b(X) forces Y to be isomorphic to such a moduli space with μ the universal obstruction (Theorem B / Theorem 2.4). Combining these gives an iff criterion for twisted derived equivalences between torsors under abelian varieties (Theorem C / Corollary 2.8). The paper also establishes a twisted analogue of the Orlov–Polishchuk criterion over algebraically closed fields (Theorem D / Proposition 4.6) and shows that every isometric isomorphism between A× and B×B̂ can be realized by a twisted derived equivalence after passing to suitable torsors (Theorem E / Proposition 4.7).

Significance. If the central theorems are correct, this is a valuable contribution: it generalizes Mukai's and Gulbrandsen's Fourier–Mukai equivalences from abelian varieties to torsors, provides a converse to the moduli-space construction, and extends parts of the classical derived-equivalence criterion for abelian varieties to coefficients in the Brauer group and to arbitrary base fields. The paper is honest about its external dependencies, especially the characteristic-0 hypothesis in [dJO22, Theorem 1.1], and its proofs are largely self-contained modulo the cited results. The construction of SSH^ξ_{X/k} as a torsor under an abelian variety and the Lagrangian-subvariety analysis in Section 3 are independently interesting.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 2.4(3) and Corollary 2.8] The 'only if' direction of the headline classification for arbitrary fields is load-bearing on an unproved positive-characteristic extension of [dJO22, Theorem 1.1]. In the proof of Theorem 2.4, after establishing dim S(E_y) ≥ dim X, the argument invokes [dJO22, Theorem 1.1, Remark 1.3, (6.1)] to conclude that E_y is, up to shift, a simple semi-homogeneous sheaf. The introduction explicitly states that [dJO22, Theorem 1.1] is proved only in characteristic 0 and that it is not known whether that hypothesis is necessary. The workaround for case (3) does not remove this dependency: it only produces the inequality dim S(E_y) ≥ dim X, after which the same [dJO22] implication is applied. Consequently, if the characteristic-0 hypothesis in [dJO22, Theorem 1.1] turns out to be necessary, Theorem 2.4(3) and Corollary 2.8 lose support over arbitrary fields. The author should either prove the needed positive-characteristic statement, restrict the statement of Theorem 2.4(3) and Corollary 2.8 to characteristic 0 (or to a characteristic in which the [dJO22] result is known), or clearly state this as an open condition in the theorems.
  2. [Theorem 2.1, proof] The verification of condition (1) of Theorem A.40 relies on [HP24, Proposition 6.3] together with an unstated remark from 'Section 6' of [HP24] that is said to imply that all vertical maps in the displayed diagram are isomorphisms. This is a crucial step: it is used to conclude that the map Ext^1(k(y), k(y)) → Ext^1(E_y, E_y) is an isomorphism. The remark is not reproduced, and the hypotheses that make the remark applicable to the present setting (with X = SSH^ξ_{X/k,D} and Y = X_D) are not verified in the text. The author should state the precise remark and check its hypotheses, or replace this step with a direct deformation-theoretic argument. Without this, the full faithfulness part of Theorem 2.1 is not fully established as written.
  3. [Lemma 2.2] Lemma 2.2 asserts that [Or02, Lemma 4.8] applies in arbitrary characteristic because 'its proof does not use the assumptions on the characteristic.' No details or page/equation reference are given. Since this lemma is used to verify condition (2) of Theorem A.40 (the orthogonality condition for non-isomorphic simple semi-homogeneous sheaves), it is load-bearing for Theorem 2.1. The author should supply a proof of the characteristic independence or cite a precise statement in the literature that covers arbitrary fields; the current assertion is not sufficient for a formal proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, Theorem C] The sentence 'Let A and B be abelian varieties over field k' is missing the indefinite article; it should read 'over a field k'.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'digonalizable' in Appendix A, 'vareities' in Theorem E, 'Propoisiton' in the proof of Proposition 2.6, and 'isomorphsim' in the proof of Theorem 2.1. These should be corrected.
  3. [Section 1, Lemma 1.13] The proof of Lemma 1.13 relies on generic flatness and unions over translates, but the statement assumes the orbit map is surjective on k-points; the deduction that the induced map G/stab(x) → X_red is an isomorphism should explicitly justify why the faithfully flat morphism obtained factors through the desired isomorphism, rather than merely asserting it. This is a clarity issue, not a substantive gap.
  4. [Proposition 2.6, proof] The phrase 'the map on inertia is the identity map Gm → Gm' is terse; the reason is that the action of the inertia stack on the universal twisted sheaf is by scalar multiplication, but this deserves a sentence of explanation given that the map on inertia is a key step in proving that the induced map of stacks is an isomorphism.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the construction and converse are genuinely non-tautological, with external classification results serving as load-bearing inputs rather than the paper's own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's main claims are not circular. Theorem 2.1 constructs a twisted derived equivalence between a torsor X and a moduli space of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves by directly verifying the hypotheses of the external full faithfulness criterion Theorem A.40, using Lemma 2.2 for Ext vanishing and [HP24, Proposition 6.3] for the Ext^1 isomorphism; no parameter is fitted to the conclusion. The converse in Theorem 2.4 starts from an arbitrary twisted derived equivalence and proves, via [dJO22, Theorem 1.1], that each fiber object is a simple semi-homogeneous sheaf up to shift, then uses openness and properness to identify Y with a moduli space. The conclusion is not assumed or definitionally built into the input equivalence. The paper honestly notes that [dJO22, Theorem 1.1] is only proved in characteristic 0 and that its positive-characteristic analogue is open; this is an external correctness/scope dependency, not circularity. The reliance on [HP24, Proposition 6.3] and the remark in Section 6 of [HP24] is likewise external, machine-checkable-in-principle support, not a self-citation. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no ansatz imported from the author's prior work. The classification statement in Corollary 2.8 is the natural shape of such a theorem: it characterizes which Y can appear, and the 'if and only if' is assembled from a construction and a genuine converse, each independently proven from stated assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters and no invented entities: the paper introduces the moduli spaces SSH^ξ and the universal obstruction μ, but these are standard geometric objects with independent evidence (a moduli problem and the Brauer class of a Gm-gerbe). The debt of the paper is a list of substantial external theorems, chiefly [dJO22, Thm 1.1], [HP24, Prop 6.3], [Or02, Lemma 4.8], [Hon18, Thm A.1], and the dg-enhancement results, together with the paper's own Lemma 1.13. None of these are circular with the target results.

assumptions (10)
  • domain assumption Mukai's theory of semi-homogeneous vector bundles on abelian varieties ([Mu78, Thm 3.16, 5.8, 7.11])
    Used in Lemma 1.10, Corollary 1.7, and Lemma 3.6 to identify stabilizers of semi-homogeneous bundles and to control their moduli; assumed valid in all characteristics over algebraically closed fields.
  • domain assumption [dJO22, Theorem 1.1]: an object E in D^b(X) with dim Ext^i(E,E) = (g choose i) for all i <= 1 is a simple semi-homogeneous sheaf up to shift
    Load-bearing for the converse Theorem 2.4; proven only in characteristic 0, with the author quoting [dJO22, Remark 1.3] that necessity of the characteristic-0 hypothesis is unknown. The paper works around it for cases (2) and (3) of Theorem 2.4.
  • domain assumption [HP24, Proposition 6.3] plus the Section-6 remark that the relevant deformation-theoretic vertical maps are isomorphisms
    Provides the isomorphism Ext^1(k(x),k(x)) ≅ Ext^1(E_x,E_x) needed for condition (1) of Theorem A.40 in the proof of Theorem 2.1; the external preprint is not reproduced.
  • standard math [Or02, Lemma 4.8]: Ext^i(E,F) = 0 for distinct semi-homogeneous vector bundles of the same slope
    Used in Lemma 2.2 to obtain condition (2) of Theorem A.40; the author asserts without detail that the proof is characteristic-independent.
  • domain assumption [Hon18, Theorem A.1]: a twisted derived equivalence forces equal Picard and Albanese dimensions
    Used in Theorem 2.4, case (2), to get dim Pic^0(Y) = dim Pic^0(X); applied after base change to k-bar, where μ in Br_1(Y) vanishes.
  • domain assumption [CNS22] uniqueness of dg-enhancements; [TV07, Cor 3.24]; [Ros09, Thm 2.12]: Autoeq^0(D^b_dg(Y, μ^{-1})) ≃ A × Â and Pic^0(Y) embeds
    Used in Theorem 2.4 to bound dim S(E_y) in the general-characteristic workaround of the [dJO22] hypothesis.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 1.13 (orbit map of a smooth commutative group with surjective orbit gives G/stab(x) ≅ X_red)
    A lemma proved inside the paper via generic flatness and translates; it is central to Proposition 1.12, the statement that SSH^ξ is a torsor under A(ξ).
  • standard math [Pol12, Lemma 2.2.7]
    Used in Lemma 3.7 for the finiteness of Z ∩ graph(n·φ_L) and in Remark 3.9 for the factorization of isometric isomorphisms.
  • standard math [LO15, Lemma 5.2] and [Ina02, Remark 0.3]: moduli stack sD_{X/k} of simple complexes, open substack Spl_{X/k}, and open immersion of any FM-equivalent Y into sD_{X/k}
    Infrastructure for Proposition 2.6 and Theorem 2.4; assumed without reproof.
  • standard math Twisted derived category foundations (Căldăraru's thesis, [BS21], [HR17], [Lie07]) as re-developed in Appendix A
    The appendix re-proves the necessary twisted-category results; the author declares no claim to originality there, and the paper's main theorems depend on these foundations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Semi-Homogeneous Sheaves and Twisted Derived Categories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NJDVG5HS

@misc{pith2026241110274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Semi-Homogeneous Sheaves and Twisted Derived Categories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NJDVG5HS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10274}
}
read the original abstract

We produce twisted derived equivalences between torsors under abelian varieties and their moduli spaces of simple semi-homogeneous sheaves. We also establish the natural converse to this result and show that a large class of twisted derived equivalences, including all derived equivalences, between torsors arise in this way. As corollaries, we obtain partial extensions of the usual derived equivalence criterion for abelian varieties established by Orlov and Polishchuk.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Derived isogenies between abelian varieties

    math.AG 2025-10 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For abelian varieties of dimension ≥2 over algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero, derived isogeny via twisted derived categories is equivalent to the existence of a classical isogeny whose degree is a per...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Addington, B

    N. Addington, B. Antieau, S. Frei, and K. Honigs, Rational points and derived equivalence, Compos. Math. 157 (2021), no. 5, 1036–1050. MR4251609 ↑4

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Antieau, D

    B. Antieau, D. Krashen, and M. Ward, Derived categories of torsors for abelian schemes, Adv. Math. 306(10), 1-23 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Alexeev, Complete moduli in the presence of semiabelian group action, Annals of Math

    V. Alexeev, Complete moduli in the presence of semiabelian group action, Annals of Math. 155 (2002), 611–708

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Mukai, Semi-homogeneous vector bundles on an Abelian variety, J

    S. Mukai, Semi-homogeneous vector bundles on an Abelian variety, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 18 (1978), no. 2, 239–272

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Alper, J

    J. Alper, J. Hall, and D. Rydh, The étale local structure of algebraic stacks, 2019, arXiv:1912.06162

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    & Sancho de Salas, F

    Alonso Tarrío, L., Jeremías López, A. & Sancho de Salas, F. Relative perfect complexes. Math. Z. 304, 42 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-023-03294-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209-023-03294-7 2023

  7. [7]

    Bergh, O

    D. Bergh, O. Schnürer(2021) Decompositions of derived categories of gerbes and of families of Brauer-Severi varieties, Documenta Mathematica, 26, 1465-1500

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    thesis, Cornell University (2000)

    Căldăraru, A., Derived Categories of Twisted Sheaves on Calabi-Yau Manifolds, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Canonaco, A

    A. Canonaco, A. Neeman, P. Stellari, Uniqueness of enhancements for derived and geometric categories. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma. 2022;10:e92. doi:10.1017/fms.2022.82

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    A. J. de Jong, M. Olsson, Point Objects on Abelian Varieties, arXiv:alg-geom/2209.05553

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    M. G. Gulbrandsen, Fourier-Mukai transforms of line bundles on derived equivalent abelian varieties, Matematiche (Catania) 63 (2008), no. 1, 123–137

    2008

  4. [12]

    One positive and two negative results for derived categories of algebraic stacks

    Hall J, Neeman A, Rydh D. One positive and two negative results for derived categories of algebraic stacks. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu. 2019;18(5):1087-1111. doi:10.1017/S1474748017000366

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    J. Hall, K. Priver, A generalized Bondal-Orlov full faithfulness criterion for Deligne-Mumford stacks, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2405.06229

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. Hall, D. Rydh, Algebraic groups and compact generation of their derived cate- gories of representations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 64 (2015), no. 6, 1903–1923

    2015

  7. [15]

    Hall and D

    J. Hall and D. Rydh, Perfect complexes on algebraic stacks, Compositio Math. 153 (2017), no. 11, 2318–2367

    2017

  8. [16]

    Honigs, Derived equivalence, Albanese varieties, and the zeta functions of 3-dimensional varieties, Proc

    K. Honigs, Derived equivalence, Albanese varieties, and the zeta functions of 3-dimensional varieties, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2018), no. 3, 1005–1013, With an appendix by Jeffrey D. Achter, Sebastian Casalaina-Martin, Katrina Honigs, and Charles Vial. MR 3750214

    2018

  9. [17]

    Huybrechts, Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    D. Huybrechts, Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    2006

  10. [18]

    M, Inaba, Toward a definition of moduli of complexes of coherent sheaves on a projective scheme. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 42(2):317–329, 2002

    2002

  11. [19]

    Krashen, M

    D. Krashen, M. Lieblich, Index reduction for Brauer classes via stable sheaves. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (8):Art. ID rnn010, 31, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    Laumon and L

    G. Laumon and L. Moret-Bailly, Champs algebriques, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge., vol. 39, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000

    2000

  13. [21]

    Lieblich, Moduli of twisted sheaves and generalized Azumaya algebras, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2004, Thesis (Ph.D.)–Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    M. Lieblich, Moduli of twisted sheaves and generalized Azumaya algebras, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2004, Thesis (Ph.D.)–Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    2004

  14. [22]

    Lieblich

    M. Lieblich. Moduli of complexes on a proper morphism. J. Algebraic Geom., 15(1):175–206, 2006. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-05-00418-2

    2006 doi

  15. [23]

    Lieblich and M

    M. Lieblich and M. Olsson, Fourier-Mukai partners of K3 surfaces in positive characteristic, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 48(5):1001– 1033, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Derived equivalences of Abelian varieties and symplectic isomorphisms

    A. C. López Martín and C. Tejero Prieto. “Derived equivalences of Abelian varieties and symplectic isomorphisms”. J. Geom. Phys. 122 (2017), pp. 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2017.01.010

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Duality between D(X) and D(Xb) with its application to Picard sheaves

    S. Mukai, “Duality between D(X) and D(Xb) with its application to Picard sheaves”, Nagoya Math. J. 81 (1981), 153–175

    1981

  18. [26]

    Mukai, Fourier functor and its application to the moduli of bundles on an abelian variety, Adv

    S. Mukai, Fourier functor and its application to the moduli of bundles on an abelian variety, Adv. Pure Math. 10 (1987), 515-550

    1987

  19. [27]

    Mukai, Abelian variety and spin representation, University of Warwick preprint, 1998

    S. Mukai, Abelian variety and spin representation, University of Warwick preprint, 1998

    1998

  20. [28]

    Lieblich, Moduli of complexes on a proper morphism, J

    M. Lieblich, Moduli of complexes on a proper morphism, J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), 175–206

    2006

  21. [29]

    Lieblich, Moduli of twisted sheaves, Duke Math

    M. Lieblich, Moduli of twisted sheaves, Duke Math. J., Vol. 138, No. 1 (2007), 23-118

    2007

  22. [30]

    Olsson, On proper coverings of Artin stacks, Adv

    M. Olsson, On proper coverings of Artin stacks, Adv. Math. 198 (2005), no. 1, 93–106

    2005

  23. [31]

    M. C. Olsson, Compactifying moduli spaces for abelian varieties, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1958, Springer, 2008

    1958

  24. [32]

    D. O. Orlov. Derived categories of coherent sheaves on abelian varieties and equivalences between them. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 66(3):131–158, 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Polishchuk, Symplectic biextensions and a generalization of the Fourier-Mukai transform, Math

    A. Polishchuk, Symplectic biextensions and a generalization of the Fourier-Mukai transform, Math. Research Letters 3 (1996), 813–828

    1996

  26. [34]

    Polishchuk, Analogue of Weil representation for abelian schemes, J

    A. Polishchuk, Analogue of Weil representation for abelian schemes, J. reine angew. Math. 543 (2002), 1–37

    2002

  27. [35]

    Polishchuk, Abelian Varieties, Theta Functions and the Fourier Transform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

    A. Polishchuk, Abelian Varieties, Theta Functions and the Fourier Transform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

    2003

  28. [36]

    Polishchuk, Lagrangian-invariant sheaves and functors for abelian varieties, Derived categories in algebraic geometry, EMS Ser

    A. Polishchuk, Lagrangian-invariant sheaves and functors for abelian varieties, Derived categories in algebraic geometry, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2012, pp. 197–250

    2012

  29. [37]

    Poonen and M

    B. Poonen and M. Stoll, The Cassels-Tate pairing on polarized abelian varieties, Ann. of Math. (2) 150 (1999), no. 3, 1109–1149. MR1740984 ↑1.3, 3.4

    1999

  30. [38]

    Rosenberg, Derived categories of curves of genus one and torsors over abelian varieties, arXiv:alg-geom/2212.14497

    N.Ramachandran and J. Rosenberg, Derived categories of curves of genus one and torsors over abelian varieties, arXiv:alg-geom/2212.14497

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Rosay Some remarks on the group of derived autoequivalences, 2009, arXiv: 0907.3880

    F. Rosay Some remarks on the group of derived autoequivalences, 2009, arXiv: 0907.3880

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The Stacks Project Authors, Stacks Project, http://stacks.math.columbia.edu

  33. [41]

    B. Toën, M. Vaquié, Moduli of Objects in DG-Categories, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 40 (2007): 387-444. (2007), no. 3, 387–444

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.