Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 245 references

Afterglow polarization falls and smears in time when the surrounding medium is stratified, and the two polarization peaks together reveal the viewing angle and density gradient.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:47 UTC pith:NJND5PHC

load-bearing objection Solid, honest extension of the B24 polarization model to stratified media; qualitative claims hold, but the new (k,q) two-peak diagnostic is provisional until lateral spreading is checked. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20618 v1 pith:NJND5PHC submitted 2026-07-22 astro-ph.HE

Polarization of impulsive relativistic jets propagating in a stratified medium

Gal Birenbaum , Paz Beniamini , Jonathan Granot This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-ray burstsafterglow polarizationstratified external mediumrelativistic jetsstructured jetstop-hat jetstidal disruption eventssynchrotron emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the commonly assumed uniform external medium is good enough for modeling polarized afterglows of gamma-ray bursts and jetted tidal disruption events. It argues that when the medium has a power-law density profile (as expected around long GRBs and some TDEs), the observed polarization is usually weaker and its features unfold over longer times than in a uniform medium. The reason is that a steeper medium widens the bright, polarized ring around the line of sight, which increases cancellation and slows the signature's evolution. The paper further claims that the ratio of the times and heights of the two polarization peaks for on-axis top-hat jets occupies a narrow two-dimensional space that jointly constrains the normalized viewing angle and the density power-law index, independent of the magnetic field structure. If true, polarization measurements become a probe of both jet geometry and the density profile of the ambient medium.

Core claim

The paper claims that a power-law stratified medium (density ∝ r^{-k}, 0≤k≤2) systematically lowers afterglow polarization and stretches its temporal evolution for both top-hat and structured jets, because a steeper medium widens the equal-arrival-time ring around the line of sight. For on-axis top-hat jets, the ratio of the two opposite-sign polarization peaks obeys an analytic expression involving the normalized viewing angle q and a fitted widening factor α(k) that decreases with k, and combined with the peak-height ratio it forms a narrow two-dimensional locus that jointly constrains q and k independently of magnetic field structure. Polarization peaks occur close to the geometrical ligh

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the equal-arrival-time surface (EATS) of the afterglow shock and the bright, polarized ring of emission that sits around the observer's line of sight. The width of that ring grows with the density power-law index k, changing how much of the ring the jet edge hides and therefore how the polarization curve is shaped. The paper's core analytic tool is the two-peak time ratio formula with the fitted ring-widening factor α(k), and the resulting two-dimensional (t_+/t_-, P_+/P_-) map that encodes both q and k.

Load-bearing premise

The results rest on treating the jet as locally spherical and ignoring lateral spreading of the shock; if lateral expansion is significant, the width of the polarized ring, the peak times, and the inferred k and q would shift.

What would settle it

Measure both polarization peaks of a well-localized, on-axis top-hat afterglow whose viewing angle and medium density slope are independently constrained, and compare the observed (t_+/t_-, P_+/P_-) with the paper's predicted locus: a point falling in the forbidden region of that plane would rule out the model's assumptions. Alternatively, a radio-to-optical comparison of the same source should give the same k and q; a mismatch would falsify the assumed geometry.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For long GRBs with wind-like surroundings (k≈2), afterglow polarization will typically be lower and peak later than uniform-medium models predict, so uniform-medium fits will misread both polarization level and timing.
  • Measuring both polarization peaks of an on-axis top-hat afterglow gives simultaneous constraints on the normalized viewing angle q and the density slope k, without relying on the magnetic field structure.
  • Because the main polarization peak is close in time to the light-curve break, observing cadence should target the break epoch to capture maximum polarization.
  • Steep structured jets observed off-axis show the highest peak polarization for wind-like media, making them the most promising cases for detection.
  • Joint modeling of light curves and polarization, including stratification, can break degeneracies that light-curve fits alone leave unresolved, and can help distinguish jet-driven from delayed-outflow origins of TDE radio emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the widening-ring picture is right, the same mechanism should operate in other spectral regimes, but the quantitative mapping between k and the ring width will depend on the spectral slope; this suggests the ratio method can be turned into a spectral consistency check.
  • The narrowness of the accessible region in the (t_+/t_-, P_+/P_-) plane implies that a measured point falling outside that region would point to missing physics, such as lateral jet spreading, a non-power-law medium, or a magnetic field configuration beyond the two explored limits.
  • For off-axis structured jets the polarization peak tracks the light-curve break most tightly for uniform media; extending to stratified media may provide a way to estimate the medium slope even when only a single polarization peak is observed, if the break time is known.
  • Since the model's dynamics neglect lateral spreading, the qualitative reduction and smearing with k likely survive but the fitted α(k) values would shift in more realistic dynamics; comparing the predicted q and k with independent jet-break-based constraints would test this.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends semi-analytic afterglow polarization modeling to power-law stratified external media (ρ∝r^{-k}, k=0,1,2) for both top-hat and structured jets, following the formalism of Gill & Granot (2018) and Birenbaum et al. (2024). The authors compute light curves and polarization curves, showing for k>0 that the polarized ring widens, the polarization peaks are reduced and smeared over longer times, and the polarization peak occurs near the light-curve geometrical break. For on-axis top-hat jets, they propose using the ratios of the two polarization peak times and heights (t+/t-, P+/P-) to jointly constrain the normalized viewing angle q and density slope k (Eq. 4, Fig. 9). The paper includes comparisons to the k=0 analytical models of Sari (1999) and Granot (2003), and an analytical treatment of the equal-arrival-time surface for general k in Appendix B.

Significance. If the trends hold, this is a useful step toward modeling polarization from long GRBs and jetted TDEs, whose environments are often stratified. The paper provides a clear qualitative result—polarization is reduced and temporally smeared in stratified media—and extends the parameter space to structured jets and more isotropic magnetic field configurations (ξ=0.75). The k=0 results are benchmarked against known analytical solutions, and the EATS generalization in Appendix B is a useful addition. However, the central quantitative diagnostic (joint k,q constraints) rests on dynamical assumptions that are not tested against full hydrodynamics, and the numerical results lack convergence checks.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 3.1 (Eq. 4, Fig. 9)] The new quantitative diagnostic jointly constraining q and k from t+/t- and P+/P- is built on a dynamical model that explicitly neglects lateral spreading (stated in Sec. 2). For k>0 the polarization ring widens and the Lorentz-factor evolution slows, and the ring-edge interaction determines the peak times. Lateral spreading in a real jet changes the effective edge position and local Γ(t), and for structured jets also reshapes the angular profile. These effects can shift the t+/t- and P+/P- tracks; if the shifts are k-dependent, the equal-k/equal-q tracks in Fig. 9 could overlap and the diagnostic would be compromised. The qualitative 'reduced, smeared polarization' claim is likely robust, but the quantitative diagnostic requires either a test against 2D hydrodynamical afterglow simulations or a clear caveat that it applies only in the locally spherical limit.
  2. [All numerical results, esp. Sec. 3.1/Fig. 8 and Fig. 9] No convergence tests, resolution studies, or error estimates are provided; the results are single deterministic runs. The peak times and amplitudes in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 are sensitive to the numerical treatment, as exemplified by the q=0.9, k=2 case that required 'a slightly modified afterglow model' to keep the first polarization peak in PLS G. Please add a resolution study (e.g., angular grid spacing) and an estimate of the resulting uncertainty on t± and P±, so the reader can judge whether the claimed constraining power in Fig. 9 is real or partly numerical.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.2 and Fig. 10] The figure caption labels panel (a) as a=1 (shallow) and panel (b) as a=3.5 (steep), while Section 3.2.2 describes panel (a) as steep (a=3.5) and panel (b) as shallow (a=1). This makes the reported factor-~1.06 vs factor-~1.6 polarization variations ambiguous and could lead a reader to assign the conclusions to the wrong jet structure. Correct the mismatch between text and caption, and ensure that the Discussion's statement that 'steep jets provide the best chances for measured polarization' refers to the correct panel.
  4. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (4)] The parameter α(k) is found by fitting Eq. (4) to the same numerical t+/t- ratios shown in Fig. 8. The agreement between the fitted lines and the simulation points is therefore by construction, and α(k) absorbs any model-dependent corrections. The paper should state this explicitly; otherwise the statement that 'the model is falsifiable' in the 2D observable plane is circular. Ideally, α(k) should be derived from the EATS width calculation in Appendix B, or at least the fit residuals and their q-dependence should be quantified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (1) and Appendix B] The exponent notation 'Γ∝t^{(k−3)/(8−2k)}' is typeset in a way that can be misread; please use explicit parentheses (e.g., (k-3)/(8-2k)) throughout.
  2. [Fig. 6, Sec. 3.1] The small but finite polarization at the earliest times (before the first peak) is attributed in the caption to the finite number of angular cells. This should be acknowledged as a numerical artifact in the main text as well, and ideally reduced by a finer grid or masked in the figures.
  3. [Fig. 8 caption] The phrase 'plotted in 'x' signs from the models' should be reworded (e.g., 'the x symbols mark the numerical results').
  4. [References] A few references have formatting issues (e.g., Beniamini et al. 2023 in the reference list appears to have an incomplete volume/page string); please check with the journal's bibliography style.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The t+/t- diagnostic (Eq. 4 / Fig. 9) is calibrated to the same simulated peak times it is used to constrain; qualitative polarization-smearing results remain independent.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1 (Eq. 4, Fig. 8 upper panel, Fig. 9)]
    "where the value of α(k) is of order unity and is found by fitting this expression to the time ratio of the polarization peak. These fits are shown in the upper panel of Fig. 8 in solid lines for the different media the afterglow forward shock propagates into."

    Equation (4) for t+/t- contains α(k), which is explicitly fitted to the simulated t+/t- peak-time ratios. The same fitted ratios are then used as the x-axis of Fig. 9, and the equal-k lines that generate the claimed k-q constraints are drawn from this fitted formula. Thus the statement that k can be inferred from t+/t- reduces to comparing an observed value against a curve fitted to that very observable, rather than a parameter-free prediction. The P+/P- axis is computed directly from the simulations, so the joint diagnostic is only partially circular.

full rationale

The paper's main qualitative results (reduced polarization and slower temporal evolution for larger k) are produced by a numerical shock/EATS model and are benchmarked against analytic k=0 results (Sari 1999; Granot 2003), so those claims are not circular. The analytical EATS generalization in Appendix B is also derived from first principles independently of the target diagnostic. The one load-bearing circular step is the construction of the t+/t- diagnostic: Eq. (4) is calibrated by fitting α(k) to the simulated peak-time ratios, and the same ratios are then plotted in Fig. 9 as the observable from which k and q are said to be inferable and as the basis for the claimed 'inaccessible regions.' This makes the time-ratio part of the diagnostic an interpolation of the target quantity rather than an independent prediction. The P+/P- axis retains independent simulation-based content, so the joint constraint is only partially circular. The reliance on B24 and Gill & Granot (2018) for the numerical formalism and the stated neglect of lateral spreading are modeling assumptions and normal prior-work dependencies, not circular reductions. Overall score 5 reflects one fitted-input-called-prediction element within an otherwise independent analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on the standard afterglow synchrotron framework plus a locally-spherical dynamics approximation. The only newly introduced fit is alpha(k), used to compactly describe the simulated peak-time ratios. The microphysical parameters (p, xi, epsilon_e, epsilon_B) are inherited from prior work and fixed, not fitted here.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha(k) = not quoted in text; given in Fig. 8 labels
    Parameter in Eq. 4 fitted to simulated t+/t- ratios for each k; controls the proposed k-q diagnostic.
  • xi (magnetic field stretching parameter) = 0 and 0.75
    Chosen values for shock-plane and quasi-isotropic field; 0.75 motivated by GW170817 limits; strongly affects absolute polarization but not the peak-ratio diagnostic.
  • p (electron power-law index) = 2.5
    Sets the maximum synchrotron polarization Pi_max=(p+1)/(p+7/3) and the absolute polarization scale.
  • Fixed scenario parameters (theta_c, Gamma_c, E_c, n0, nu_obs, d_L, z) = 3 deg, 350, 1e54 erg, 1 cm^-3, 1e15 Hz, 1e28 cm, 0.54
    Hand-chosen model inputs defining the explored scenario; they set absolute fluxes and break times but not the relative k-trends.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Adiabatic Blandford-McKee deceleration profile Gamma ∝ R^(k-3)/2 in a power-law external medium
    Used in Appendix B (Eqs. B.1-B.5) to derive the EATS for general k.
  • domain assumption Jet dynamics are locally spherical; lateral spreading is neglected
    Explicitly stated in Methods: 'the jet dynamics are assumed to be locally spherical (neglecting lateral dynamics)'. This underpins all light-curve and polarization calculations.
  • domain assumption Shock-generated magnetic field is random with anisotropy set by stretching parameter xi, sampled as in B24/Gill & Granot (2018)
    Determines polarization magnitude and angle structure; the two adopted values xi->0 and xi=0.75 cover the plausible range.
  • domain assumption The observed frequency is in PLS G (nu_m < nu_obs < nu_c) at all times
    Section 3 states this; polarization depends on spectral regime, so results do not automatically carry to other closure regimes.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17750 in / 13114 out tokens · 103272 ms · 2026-08-01T09:47:47.038472+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and at least some tidal disruption events (TDEs) are highly energetic transients involving impulsive relativistic jets. As these jets propagate into their surrounding media, they drive a relativistic forward shock into it, which radiates multi-wavelength polarized synchrotron emission, known as an afterglow. Analyzing the afterglow light curve along with its polarization curve can shed light on the geometrical properties of the GRB or TDE system such as the magnetic field structure behind the shock, the jet angular structure and even distinguish between proposed scenarios of delayed radio emission seen in some TDEs. While most afterglow polarization measurements are for long GRBs, whose massive star progenitor winds are expected to form a stratified external medium, the polarization from such environments is largely unexplored. Similarly, stratified media surround jetted TDEs. In this work we explore how shock propagation into a stratified medium affects the observed afterglow polarization from impulsive relativistic jets. We find that for both top hat and structured jets, in most cases the polarization levels are reduced and its temporal signature evolves on longer time scales compared to a uniform external medium. The polarization peaks at times close to a geometrical break in the light curve, indicating measurements during this time probe the maximal levels of polarization possible for the system. In addition, observationally capturing the polarization evolution time scales can assist in constraining our viewing angle and the external medium stratification. Such composite models, that account for more realistic systems that are motivated by light curve fittings, will allow us to complement afterglow light curves better and promote joint modeling of these observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20618 by Gal Birenbaum, Jonathan Granot, Paz Beniamini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The EATS - the combination of radii and angles that contribute to the observed emission at a given observer time tobs. Colors indicate different power-law indices of the external medium density profile k. For k > 0 we re-normalize the shape of the EATS according to the curve shown for k = 0 in both axes in order to allow for easier comparison [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Angular contribution to the observed polarization for a spher￾ical flow, also applicable for a top hat jet, observed on-axis when Γ ≫ 1 θc−θobs and ξ → 0, for varying values of k, normalized accord￾ing to Πmax = p+1 p+7/3 (Rybicki & Lightman 1979), plotted as function of Γ∗,kθ˜. The contribution to the polarization peaks at the peak of the EATS height, where Γ∗,kθ˜ = 1, independently of k. In dashed thin l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Polarization signature of a top hat jet, observed at q = 0.7 with νobs = 1015 [Hz] and a random magnetic field confined to the shock plane (ξ → 0), for k = 0. Panel (a): Angular polarization maps of the emitting region (plotted using the spherical projection in Fig. B.1, blue lines), where the radius of the map corresponds to the polar angle θ from the jet symmetry axis that is located at the map center an… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Observed polarization degree (upper panels) and flux (lower panels) as a function of time for an on-axis top hat jet model observed at ν = 1015 [Hz] (PLS G) with a random magnetic field structure, confined to the shock plane (ξ → 0). k denotes the power-law index of the external medium density profile. The light curve break is marked with a star in the lower panels. The dash-dotted dark yellow lines presen… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper panel: Time ratio of the positively and negatively signed polarization peak times (marked t+ and t− respectively) of on-axis top hat jet models, plotted as function of the normalized viewing angle q = θobs θc , plotted in ’x’ signs from the models considered in this work. The colors correspond to the power-law index of the external medium density profile. The solid lines, following the trends of the … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Observed polarization degree (upper panels) and flux (lower panels) at observer frequency ν = 1015 [Hz] (PLS G) as function of time for structured jet models, with a random magnetic field structure, confined to the shock plane (ξ → 0) and an off-axis viewing angle of q = 3. The various values of k represent different power-law indices of the external medium density profile. The light curve break is marked… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

245 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    1966, in Stellar Evolution, ed.\ R

    Baker, N. 1966, in Stellar Evolution, ed.\ R. F. Stein,& A. G. W. Cameron (Plenum, New York) 333

    1966

  2. [2]

    1988, A&A, 200, 58

    Balluch, M. 1988, A&A, 200, 58

    1988

  3. [3]

    Cox, J. P. 1980, Theory of Stellar Pulsation (Princeton University Press, Princeton) 165

    1980

  4. [4]

    N.,& Stewart, J

    Cox, A. N.,& Stewart, J. N. 1969, Academia Nauk, Scientific Information 15, 1

    1969

  5. [5]

    1980, Prog

    Mizuno H. 1980, Prog. Theor. Phys., 64, 544

    1980

  6. [6]

    Tscharnuter W. M. 1987, A&A, 188, 55

    1987

  7. [7]

    1992, in ASP Conf

    Terlevich, R. 1992, in ASP Conf. Ser. 31, Relationships between Active Galactic Nuclei and Starburst Galaxies, ed. A. V. Filippenko, 13

    1992

  8. [8]

    Yorke, H. W. 1980a, A&A, 86, 286

  9. [9]

    F., Tytler, D

    Zheng, W., Davidsen, A. F., Tytler, D. & Kriss, G. A. 1997, preprint

    1997

  10. [10]

    The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 494, Issue 1, pp

    Sari, Re'em , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 494, Issue 1, pp. L49-L52. , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:9709300 , file =

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Chromatic Signatures in the Microlensing of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319843 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0101234 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Analytic expressions for the surface brightness profile of gamma-ray burst afterglow images. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00533.x , archivePrefix =. 0811.3248 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    -rays from coalescing neutron stars , url =

    Eichler, David and Livio, Mario and Piran, Tsvi and Schramm, David N , file =. -rays from coalescing neutron stars , url =. Fersht. A. R.. Leatherbarrow. R J

  14. [14]

    Metzger, B. D. and Giannios, D. and Thompson, T. A. and Bucciantini, N. and Quataert, E. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

  15. [15]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Toma, Kenji , eprint =. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  16. [16]

    arXiv , arxivId =:1811.11555 , journal =

    Gill, Ramandeep and Granot, Jonathan and Kumar, Pawan , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:1811.11555 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [19]

    and Matteson, J

    Band, D. and Matteson, J. and Ford, L. and Schaefer, B. and Palmer, D. and Teegarden, B. and Cline, T. and Briggs, M. and Paciesas, W. and Pendleton, G. and Fishman, G. and Kouveliotou, C. and Meegan, C. and Wilson, R. and Lestrade, P. and Band, D. and Matteson, J. and Ford, L. and Schaefer, B. and Palmer, D. and Teegarden, B. and Cline, T. and Briggs, M....

  18. [20]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9301004 , journal =

    Piran, T and Shemi, A and Narayan, R , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9301004 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [21]

    apj , keywords =

    Rol, E and Wijers, R. apj , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317256 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/317256

  20. [22]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters , month =

    Yonetoku, Daisuke and Murakami, Toshio and Gunji, Shuichi and Mihara, Tatehiro and Toma, Kenji and Morihara, Yoshiyuki and Takahashi, Takuya and Wakashima, Yudai and Yonemochi, Hajime and Sakashita, Tomonori and Toukairin, Noriyuki and Fujimoto, Hirofumi and Kodama, Yoshiki , doi =. Astrophysical Journal Letters , month =

  21. [23]

    Metzger, B. D. and Giannios, D. and Thompson, T. A. and Bucciantini, N. and Quataert, E. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:arXiv:1012.0001v2 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [24]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9906471 , journal =

    Ghisellini, Gabriele and Lazzati, Davide , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9906471 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [25]

    and Pavlidou, V

    Blinov, D. and Pavlidou, V. and Papadakis, I. E. and Hovatta, T. and Pearson, T. J. and Liodakis, I. and Panopoulou, G. V. and Angelakis, E. and Balokovi. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw158 , file =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw158

  24. [26]

    Fanaroff, B. L. and Riley, J. M. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month =

  25. [27]

    The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    Urata, Yuji and Toma, Kenji and Huang, Kuiyun and Asada, Keiichi and Nagai, Hiroshi and Takahashi, Satoko and Petitpas, Glen and Tashiro, Makoto and Yamaoka, Kazutaka , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

  26. [28]

    arXiv , arxivId =:2009.14081 , journal =

    Buckley, D. arXiv , arxivId =:2009.14081 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [29]

    Mundell, C. G. and Kopa. Nature , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature12814 , file =

    doi:10.1038/nature12814

  28. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Sari, Re'em and Piran, Tsvi , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:9608152 , file =

  29. [31]

    Rybicki, George B and Lightman, Alan P , editor =

  30. [32]

    doi:10.1063/1.861619 , journal =

    Blandford, R. doi:10.1063/1.861619 , journal =

    doi:10.1063/1.861619

  31. [33]

    and Davelaar, Jordy and Philippov, Alexander A

    Bromberg, Omer and Singh, Chandra B. and Davelaar, Jordy and Philippov, Alexander A. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1908.08620 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  32. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal , number =

    Granot, Jonathan and Konigl, Arieh , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , number =

  33. [35]

    , file =

    Kole, M. , file =. 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2019), held July 24th-August 1st, 2019 in Madison, WI, U.S.A. Online at https://pos.sissa.it/cgi-bin/reader/conf.cgi?confid=358, id.572 , month =

    2019

  34. [36]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , number =

    Piran, Tsvi , doi =. Reviews of Modern Physics , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:0405503v1 , file =

  35. [37]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9307024 , journal =

    Paczynski, Bohdan and Rhoads, James E , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9307024 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [38]

    GRB Coordinates Network , month =

    Covino, S and Lazzati, D and Ghisellini, G and Saracco, P and Campana, S and Chincarini, G and. GRB Coordinates Network , month =

  37. [39]

    , booktitle =

    Laurent, P and Et al. , booktitle =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750809.035 , pages =

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750809.035

  38. [40]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , month =

    Bersier, D and Stanek, K. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , month =

  39. [41]

    Abdo, A. A. and Ackermann, M. and Arimoto, M. and Asano, K. and Atwood, W. B. and Axelsson, M. and Baldini, L. and Ballet, J. and Band, D. L. and Barbiellini, G. and Baring, M. G. and Bastieri, D. and Battelino, M. and Baughman, B. M. and Bechtol, K. and Bellardi, F. and Bellazzini, R. and Berenji, B. and Bhat, P. N. and Bissaldi, E. and Blandford, R. D. ...

  40. [42]

    and Pavlidou, V

    Blinov, D. and Pavlidou, V. and Papadakis, I. and Kiehlmann, S. and Panopoulou, G. and Liodakis, I. and King, O. G. and Angelakis, E. and Balokovi. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1723 , issn =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1723

  41. [43]

    Jets and gamma-ray burst unification schemes , booktitle=

    Granot, Jonathan and Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico , editor=. Jets and gamma-ray burst unification schemes , booktitle=. 2012 , pages=

    2012

  42. [44]

    , keywords =

    Off-Axis Afterglow Emission from Jetted Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/340991 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0201322 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [45]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Gill, Ramandeep and Granot, Jonathan , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1803.05892 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [46]

    , keywords =

    Numerical Simulations of an Initially Top-hat Jet and the Afterglow of GW170817/GRB170817A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3577 , archivePrefix =. 1902.10303 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  45. [48]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Padovani, Paolo , doi =. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

  46. [49]

    , keywords =

    Katz, J. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173723 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/173723

  47. [50]

    and Frontera, F

    Costa, E. and Frontera, F. and Heise, J. and Feroci, M. and in't Zand, J. and Fiore, F. and Cinti, M. N. and. Nature, Volume 387, Issue 6635, pp. 783-785 (1997). , keywords =. doi:10.1038/42885 , file =

    doi:10.1038/42885 1997

  48. [51]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322612e , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322612e

  49. [52]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Gottlieb, Ore and Levinson, Amir and Nakar, Ehud , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:2002.12384 , issn =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [53]

    apj , keywords =

    Price, P. apj , keywords =. doi:10.1086/374730 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/374730

  51. [54]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0310236 , journal =

    Nakar, Ehud and Oren, Yonatan , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0310236 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [55]

    and Bloom, J.S

    Woosley, S.E. and Bloom, J.S. , doi =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:0609142 , issn =

  53. [56]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9305003 , journal =

    Biermann, P. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9305003 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [57]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0301608 , keywords =

    Covino, S and Ghisellini, G and Lazzati, D and Malesani, D , booktitle =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0301608 , keywords =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [58]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9704116 , journal =

    Waxman, Eli , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9704116 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [59]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0307290 , journal =

    Nakar, Ehud and Piran, Tsvi and Waxman, Eli , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0307290 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [60]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Urata, Yuji and Toma, Kenji and Huang, Kuiyun and Asada, Keiichi and Nagai, Hiroshi and Takahashi, Satoko and Petitpas, Glen and Tashiro, Makoto and Yamaoka, Kazutaka , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1904.08111 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  58. [61]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0409382 , journal =

    Medvedev, Mikhail V and Fiore, Massimiliano and Fonseca, Ricardo A and Silva, Luis O and Mori, Warren B , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/0409382 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [62]

    mnras , keywords =

    Wiersema, K and Curran, P. mnras , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20943.x , eprint =

    arXiv 2012

  60. [63]

    Nature , keywords =

    Tanvir, N R and Levan, A J and Fruchter, A S and Hjorth, J and Hounsell, R A and Wiersema, K and Tunnicliffe, R L , doi =. Nature , keywords =

  61. [64]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =

    Laskar, Tanmoy and Alexander, Kate D and Gill, Ramandeep and Granot, Jonathan and Berger, Edo and Mundell, C. Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2247 , eprint =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2247 2041

  62. [65]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol

    Blandford, Roger and Meier, David and Readhead, Anthony , doi =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 57, p.467-509 , keywords =

  63. [66]

    and Fong, W

    Berger, E. and Fong, W. and Chornock, R. , doi =. Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:arXiv:1306.3960v2 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [67]

    , keywords =

    Impact of the ISM magnetic field on GRB afterglow polarization. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2491 , archivePrefix =. 2008.10624 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [68]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 506, Issue 3, pp.4275-4288 , keywords =

    Birenbaum, Gal and Bromberg, Omer , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 506, Issue 3, pp.4275-4288 , keywords =

  66. [69]

    Kole, M. and. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037915 , file =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037915

  67. [70]

    arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9904363 , journal =

    Medvedev, Mikhail V and Loeb, Abraham , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:astro-ph/9904363 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Sari, Re'em , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:9709300 , file =

  69. [72]

    Hillas, A. M. , doi =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , month =

  70. [73]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , keywords =

    Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and Bromberg, Omer , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , keywords =

  71. [74]

    aj , keywords =

    Holland, Stephen T and Weidinger, Michael and Fynbo, Johan P. aj , keywords =. doi:10.1086/374235 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/374235

  72. [75]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Bromberg, Omer and Nakar, Ehud and Piran, Tsvi and Sari, Re'Em , doi =. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

  73. [76]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Bromberg, Omer and Tchekhovskoy, Alexander , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

  74. [77]

    and Bromberg, Omer and Singh, Chandra B

    Davelaar, Jordy and Philippov, Alexander A. and Bromberg, Omer and Singh, Chandra B. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:1910.13370 , issn =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  75. [78]

    Galama, T. J. and Vreeswijk, P. M. and van Paradijs, J. and Kouveliotou, C. and Augusteijn, T. and B. Nature , keywords =. doi:10.1038/27150 , issn =

    doi:10.1038/27150

  76. [79]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =

    Yonetoku, Daisuke and Murakami, Toshio and Gunji, Shuichi and Mihara, Tatehiro and Toma, Kenji and Sakashita, Tomonori and Morihara, Yoshiyuki and Takahashi, Takuya and Toukairin, Noriyuki and Fujimoto, Hirofumi and Kodama, Yoshiki and Kubo, Shin and. Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1111.1779 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [80]

    , keywords =

    Detection of Polarization in the Afterglow of GRB 990510 with the ESO Very Large Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/312262 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9906346 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [81]

    arXiv , arxivId =:9712005 , file =

    Sari, Re'em and Piran, Tsvi and Narayan, Ramesh , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:9712005 , file =

  79. [82]

    aap , keywords =

    Rol, E and Wijers, R. aap , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030731 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030731

  80. [83]

    Nousek, J. A. and Kouveliotou, C. and Grupe, D. and Page, K. L. and Granot, J. and Ramirez‐Ruiz, E. and Patel, S. K. and Burrows, D. N. and Mangano, V. and Barthelmy, S. and Beardmore, A. P. and Campana, S. and Capalbi, M. and Chincarini, G. and Cusumano, G. and Falcone, A. D. and Gehrels, N. and Giommi, P. and Goad, M. R. and Godet, O. and Hurkett, C. P....

Showing first 80 references.