REVIEW 2 cited by
Evidence Sentence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Remarkable success has been achieved in the last few years on some limited machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks. However, it is still difficult to interpret the predictions of existing MRC models. In this paper, we focus on extracting evidence sentences that can explain or support the answers of multiple-choice MRC tasks, where the majority of answer options cannot be directly extracted from reference documents. Due to the lack of ground truth evidence sentence labels in most cases, we apply distant supervision to generate imperfect labels and then use them to train an evidence sentence extractor. To denoise the noisy labels, we apply a recently proposed deep probabilistic logic learning framework to incorporate both sentence-level and cross-sentence linguistic indicators for indirect supervision. We feed the extracted evidence sentences into existing MRC models and evaluate the end-to-end performance on three challenging multiple-choice MRC datasets: MultiRC, RACE, and DREAM, achieving comparable or better performance than the same models that take as input the full reference document. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work extracting evidence sentences for multiple-choice MRC.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DCMN+: Dual Co-Matching Network for Multi-choice Reading Comprehension
DCMN+ combines bidirectional passage-question-option matching with passage sentence selection and answer option interaction to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on five multiple-choice reading comprehension datasets.
-
Reasoning-Driven Question-Answering for Natural Language Understanding
The thesis presents a synthesis of previously published work on abductive reasoning for QA, essential-term detection, multi-sentence and temporal commonsense datasets, and a formal framework for reasoning limitations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.