Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Correlating neural and symbolic representations of language

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.06401 v2 pith:NP2NCE2Q submitted 2019-05-14 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords methodsneurallanguagerepresentationsanalysisinformationsymbolicsyntax
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Analysis methods which enable us to better understand the representations and functioning of neural models of language are increasingly needed as deep learning becomes the dominant approach in NLP. Here we present two methods based on Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and Tree Kernels (TK) which allow us to directly quantify how strongly the information encoded in neural activation patterns corresponds to information represented by symbolic structures such as syntax trees. We first validate our methods on the case of a simple synthetic language for arithmetic expressions with clearly defined syntax and semantics, and show that they exhibit the expected pattern of results. We then apply our methods to correlate neural representations of English sentences with their constituency parse trees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher-order Comparisons of Sentence Encoder Representations

    cs.CL 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sentences that take humans longer to read also show larger disagreement between layers of pretrained language encoders.

Pith tools