REVIEW 2 cited by
A Comparative Study of Transformer-Based Language Models on Extractive Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Question Answering (QA) is a task in natural language processing that has seen considerable growth after the advent of transformers. There has been a surge in QA datasets that have been proposed to challenge natural language processing models to improve human and existing model performance. Many pre-trained language models have proven to be incredibly effective at the task of extractive question answering. However, generalizability remains as a challenge for the majority of these models. That is, some datasets require models to reason more than others. In this paper, we train various pre-trained language models and fine-tune them on multiple question answering datasets of varying levels of difficulty to determine which of the models are capable of generalizing the most comprehensively across different datasets. Further, we propose a new architecture, BERT-BiLSTM, and compare it with other language models to determine if adding more bidirectionality can improve model performance. Using the F1-score as our metric, we find that the RoBERTa and BART pre-trained models perform the best across all datasets and that our BERT-BiLSTM model outperforms the baseline BERT model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CaresAI at BioCreative IX Track 1 -- LLM for Biomedical QA
Fine-tuned LLaMA 3 8B reaches ~0.8 concept-level accuracy on MedHopQA development data but only ~0.5 exact match in validation and 0.0 to 0.2 on the test set.
-
A Survey of the State-of-the-Art in Conversational Question Answering Systems
A review that categorizes ConvQA components, techniques, models, and datasets, with no new experimental result.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.