Fermions and the Renormalisation Group at Large N

Charlie Cresswell-Hogg; Daniel F. Litim

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 114 references

Fermions and the Renormalisation Group at Large N

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read At leading order in the number of fermion flavours, quantum effective actions reduce exactly to functionals of flavour-singlet bilinears, making their renormalisation-group flows closed and solvable.

desk verdict A serious large-N fermionic RG paper whose central closure argument is plausible despite formal gaps; the specific O(N) counting objection from the stress test does not land once the field scalings are kept consistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04473 v1 pith:NX5OZNEM submitted 2025-02-06 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-ph

Charlie Cresswell-Hogg , Daniel F. Litim This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elhep-ph

keywords functionalrenormalisationgrouplargeNlimitfermionbilinearslocalpotentialapproximationGross-NeveumodelNambu-Jona-Lasinioanomalousdimensionconformalfixedpoints

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At leading order in the number of fermion flavours N, the paper shows that quantum effective actions of fermionic field theories with global U(N) symmetry take an exact reduced form: the classical kinetic term plus a functional of flavour-singlet fermion bilinears and their derivatives. This structure is preserved by the exact renormalisation-group flow, which means fermion anomalous dimensions vanish, the local potential approximation is exact and exactly solvable, and derivative interactions decouple from the potential. The result turns strongly coupled fermionic fixed points, scaling dimensions, and mass generation into tractable calculations, and it extends to fermions the large-N functional simplification previously established for scalar fields. The paper also identifies when the simplification fails, and shows that fluctuation-induced fermion masses are suppressed as 1/N even when no symmetry protects them.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the 'doubled' fermion field χ = (ψ, \barψ^T)^T, the antisymmetric symplectic matrices M_A that realise bilinears as J^A = 1/2 χ^T M_A χ, and the Hessian decomposition (18), which separates a first-derivative term δF/δJ contracted with M_A from a second-derivative term built from ξξ^T, with ξ = M χ. After tracing, the first-derivative term can produce an explicit factor of N through products of Dirac and symplectic matrices containing 1_{2N}, whereas the second-derivative term yields no factor of N. Expanding the inverse Hessian as a formal power series, the paper argues that all contributions built from the second-derivative part are 1/N subleading, leaving the leading-order flow (21)-(22) depending only on first derivatives. That closure is what makes the local potential flow exact, exactly solvable, and independent of higher-derivative interactions.

What would settle it

Keep the subleading δ²F/δJ δJ term in the Hessian (18) for a concrete large-N model such as three-dimensional Gross-Neveu theory, expand the inverse in (14) to first order in that term, and compute the trace for a configuration with a derivative interaction of type (25); if any term carries an explicit factor of N, then η_ψ ≠ 0 at leading order and the exact-solution class is not closed, whereas if all such terms are O(1), the large-N closure claim is verified at that order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that, at N → ∞, the Wetterich flow admits exact solutions of the form Γ_k[χ] = 1/2 ∫ χ Γ^μ ∂_μ χ + F_k[J], where J^A = \barψ_i $γ^{{(A)}}$ ψ_i are the flavour-singlet bilinears and F_k is a quasi-local functional of them, valid for any regulator and any initial condition of that form. For such theories the flow of the local potential V_k(J) is closed, driven only by first derivatives of F_k, and can be integrated exactly; the fermion anomalous dimension vanishes identically, because the only kinetic corrections that F_k[J] can contain are total derivatives. Non-zero anomalous dimensions can arise only in theories whose microscopic interactions are not functionals of fermion bilinears, and the paper proves that radiative fermion masses vanish at infinite N for the most general U(N)-symmetric interactions. Applications give exact large-N flows for scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector, and axial-vector interactions, identify conformal fixed points and conformal manifolds, and show that higher-derivative interactions are inevitably induced by pointlike ones while remaining 1/N-decoupled from the potential.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the claim that the term in the flow containing second derivatives of the interaction functional always contributes one power of 1/N less than the first-derivative term, even at strong coupling, so that the formal series expansion of the inverse Hessian stays controlled.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Fermion anomalous dimensions vanish at leading order in 1/N for every theory whose microscopic action is a functional of flavour-singlet bilinears, removing wave-function renormalisation from the large-N critical theory.
Local potential flows for these theories are closed and exactly solvable, so fermion masses and zero-momentum correlation functions can be computed at strong coupling with errors suppressed as 1/N.
The RG flow closes on any chosen subset of bilinears, so Fierz ambiguities are absent at large N and truncated interaction bases are self-consistent.
Pointlike interactions always generate higher-derivative four-fermion interactions, but these do not feed back into the potential; at the interacting fixed point they are irrelevant, with universal eigenvalue shifts that depend only on dimension and fermion number.
Without symmetry protection, radiative fermion mass generation is at least 1/N suppressed for all U(N)-symmetric interactions, so at infinite N mass can only arise dynamically through a continuous phase transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the closure argument uses only the counting of flavour traces, a mixed system with many fermion flavours and few bosonic fields should inherit the same bilinear-functional simplification for its fermionic sector; a concrete next step is to derive the coupled large-N flow and check whether scalar anomalous dimensions remain the only non-zero ones.
The conjectured universal shift Δ_{2nF} = 2n − 2d for all 2nF interaction monomials is directly testable: computing the s-channel momentum dependence of the six- and eight-fermion vertices at large N would confirm the pattern or reveal where derivative-count independence breaks.
The exact marginality of vector and axial-vector four-fermion couplings in d = 2 predicts a genuine conformal manifold with classical scaling dimensions; lattice or integrability studies of the Thirring-type model could look for the absence of dynamical mass generation at large N.
A stress test of the 1/N counting itself would keep the δ²F/δJ² term in a simple strong-coupling model and check numerically whether any traced contribution acquires an explicit factor of N at finite k; this would settle whether η_ψ = 0 at large N is robust beyond the formal series.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this paper generalises the D'Attanasio-Morris scalar large-N result to fermions. It claims that at N→∞ the effective action takes the form kinetic term plus a functional of flavour-singlet bilinears, that the local potential flow is closed and exactly solvable, and that fermion anomalous dimensions vanish. The genuinely new content is the general proof for fermionic bilinears, the explicit LPA flows for scalar, vector, and axial-vector interactions, the exact marginality of vector and axial-vector four-fermion couplings in 2d, and the universal scaling-shift formula (60). These are real results and worth referee time.

The core counting argument is formal but I think it holds. The stress-test claim that the trace in (20) is O(N) rather than O(N^0) is true as a statement about the trace itself, but it is then multiplied by δ²F/δJδJ ∼ 1/N, giving an O(1) contribution, exactly the 1/N suppression the paper claims. The stress-test's worry about terms growing like N^n only arises if each fermion field component scales like √N, but that scaling would make J ∼ N², inconsistent with the J ∼ N used in the paper. With the consistent scaling (fields O(1) per component, J ∼ N, F ∼ N, δF/δJ ∼ 1, δ²F/δJ² ∼ 1/N), the geometric series is ordered in powers of 1/N and no Woodbury resummation is needed. The paper's phrase “without any factors of N” is sloppy, but the net count is correct.

What is genuinely weak: the proof of the 1/N suppression is asserted via a formal power series (19) with no convergence control and no explicit handle at strong coupling. That is a real gap, though typical for this literature and not obviously fatal. The abstract also overstates the case: “local potential approximations are exact” should read “the flow of the local potential is closed and exactly solvable.” The body is careful about this, so I would count it as wording rather than substance. Several application flows, most noticeably Eq. (44), are stated with “after performing the algebraic operations” and no derivation shown; a referee should ask for the intermediate steps. The Fierz-completeness appendix is sound, and the mass-generation argument (no inhomogeneous term in (65)) is clean.

This paper is for people already working in functional RG or large-N fermionic models. It builds on the authors' earlier Gross-Neveu results and on [67], but the general U(N) LPA flows and the 2d marginality are new. I would bring it to a specialised reading group and would cite it if I were working on fermionic RG.

Recommendation: send it to a serious referee. The formal gaps are fixable and the central claim is plausible and well-motivated.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates fermionic quantum field theories in the large-N limit using the functional renormalisation group. The main claim is that, at leading order in 1/N, the quantum effective action takes the exact form Γ_k[χ] = (1/2)∫χ Γ^μ ∂_μ χ + F_k[J], where F_k is a functional of flavour-singlet fermion bilinears and their derivatives, for any RG scheme. From this structure the authors infer that the fermion anomalous dimension vanishes, that the local potential approximation is exact and exactly solvable, and that derivative interactions decouple from the flow of the local potential. They derive general local-potential flows for U(N)-symmetric fermionic theories, apply them to scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector, axial-vector, and higher-derivative interactions, and identify conformal fixed points, scaling dimensions, conformal manifolds, and a pattern of 1/N-suppressed fermion mass generation.

Significance. If the central result (Eq. (23)) is correct, the paper provides a powerful and general simplification of large-N fermionic RG flows, extending known scalar-field results and yielding new explicit predictions for fixed points, critical exponents, and mass generation in a wide class of theories. The paper is clearly written, and the appendices contain a useful completeness proof for the pointlike-interaction basis. The concrete flows for Gross-Neveu-type and NJL-type theories, together with the identified conformal manifolds and the universal eigenvalue-shift conjecture, are valuable and testable. However, as detailed below, the proof of the central claim rests on a large-N counting argument that appears to be incorrect or at least incomplete; the applications are therefore conditional on a rigorous justification.

major comments (3)

[Section II.B, Eqs. (18)-(21)] The assertion that the second-derivative term in the Hessian (18) is 1/N subleading is based on an incorrect trace count. With the stated scalings (Γ∼N, ψ∼√N, J∼N, δ²F/δJδJ∼1/N), the trace identity (20) gives −ξ^T Y X ξ, which contains a sum over N flavour indices. For ξ∼√N this sum is O(N²) (or O(N) if the fields are taken as O(1)); in neither case is it O(N^0) as the text implies. Consequently, inserting a single second-derivative term into the formal series (19) yields a contribution of O(N), the same order as the leading first-derivative term, and higher insertions produce O(N^n) terms. The series is therefore not ordered in 1/N, and a resummation (e.g., a Woodbury/Sherman-Morrison identity) is required to show that the net effect of the second-derivative terms is O(1). The paper does not provide such a resummation. Since the closed form (23), the LPA exactness claims in Secs. II.C-III.D, and all subsequent application flows rest on this step, the central derivation is not established as written.
[Section II.B (scaling conventions)] The stated large-N scaling is internally inconsistent. The text says "the effective action scales with N, the fermion fields scale with √N", but the canonical kinetic term (1/2)∫χ Γ^μ ∂_μ χ contains a sum over N flavours, so with ψ∼√N the kinetic term scales as N², not N. If instead the elementary fields are O(1), then J∼N and the second-derivative Hessian term ξξ^T δ²F/δJδJ is O(1/N), not O(1) as the paper claims ("Hessians remain of order unity, independent of N"). The authors should clarify the scaling convention; the argument as written cannot simultaneously have Γ∼N, ψ∼√N, and J∼N. This inconsistency affects the validity of the counting in the previous comment.
[Section II.B(v)] The statement that "the necessary and sufficient condition for ηψ≠0 is that interactions are not of the form (17)" is asserted without proof. The paper shows that an initial condition of the form (17) leads to ηψ=0 (sufficiency), but it does not demonstrate that a theory with an initial condition outside (17) can never flow to the form (23) at large N. This claim is used in Sec. II.C and in the discussion to delimit the applicability of the LPA exactness, so it should either be proven or weakened to a statement about the generic flow, rather than a necessary and sufficient condition.

minor comments (4)

[Section II.B, after Eq. (23)] Typo: "derserves" should be "deserves".
[Section III.C, Eq. (56)] The derivation of the momentum traces leading to Eq. (56) is not shown; the text mentions products of distributions such as ∫dx δ(x) F[θ(x)] = ∫_0^1 dz F(z), but the intermediate steps are omitted. A brief appendix or a more explicit derivation would improve verifiability.
[Section III.C, Eq. (60)] The claim that the shift Δ4F = 4−2d is "valid for all higher-derivative 4F interaction monomials in the s-channel" is stated as an observation, but no proof is given for arbitrary derivative order. The paper should distinguish between the computed two-derivative result and the conjectural extension.
[Section III.B, Eq. (44)] The flow for vector/axial-vector interactions is stated after "performing the algebraic operations prescribed in (29)", but the angular integration leading to the (q·W)² terms is not shown. A brief derivation or reference would allow the reader to check the sign and coefficient of this term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the large-N solution (23) is derived from the flow and initial condition, not assumed; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The paper assumes an initial condition of the form F_Lambda[J] (Eq. 17), computes the Hessian (18), isolates the large-N leading terms via the formal series (19)-(20), and obtains the closed flow (21)-(22) for F_k[J]; the closure of the form (23) is a consequence of the flow equation, not an input. The LPA-exactness argument in Sec. II.C follows from the same closed flow, and the derivative-interaction flow (53) contains an inhomogeneous source term proportional to (V'')^2, so the generation of higher-derivative couplings is a computed result rather than a renamed input. Self-citations to the authors' earlier Gross-Neveu work ([28,29,100]) are used for context, for quoting integrated flows in a special case, and for comparison; none of these citations sets a constant or supplies a premise in the large-N derivation, so they are not load-bearing. The potential concern about the N-counting of the xi xi^T term around Eqs. (19)-(20) is a correctness/rigour question about whether the suppression is established, not a circularity: even if the counting were wrong, the derivation would be wrong, not equivalent to its inputs by construction. Hence no circular step can be exhibited, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exactness of the Wetterich flow, the standard large-N scaling convention, Fierz completeness of the bilinear basis, and a formal power series expansion whose convergence is not established. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

standard math Wetterich functional flow (3) is exact for the effective action.
Used throughout Sec. II; standard exact RG identity (Refs. [43-45]).
domain assumption Conventional large-N scaling holds: the effective action is O(N), fields are O(√N), and Hessians are O(1).
Invoked after Eq. (18) to decide which terms dominate in 1/N; it is a choice of normalization, not a derived property.
ad hoc to paper The inverse in (14) can be expanded in the formal series (19), and all terms containing δ²F/δJδJ remain 1/N subleading after the trace identity (20).
This is the load-bearing counting step of the exactness proof; convergence and N-dependence of contracted M_A matrices are not rigorously bounded.
standard math Every U(N)-invariant pointlike 2n-fermion interaction can be Fierz-reduced to products of flavour-singlet bilinears J_A.
Proved by induction in Appendix A using Clifford completeness; needed for the initial condition (17) to be general.
domain assumption The regulator has the form R_k(q)=iq·Γ r(q²/k²), and explicit flows use the optimised shape (37).
A scheme choice; universality claims are argued but explicit formulas depend on r.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermions and the Renormalisation Group at Large N." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NX5OZNEM

@misc{pith2026250204473,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermions and the Renormalisation Group at Large N},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NX5OZNEM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04473}
}

abstract

We investigate fermionic quantum field theories using functional renormalisation. In the limit of many fermion flavours $N$, we demonstrate that theories have exact solutions for their quantum effective actions given by quasi-local interaction functionals of fermion bilinears. The structure implies that local potential approximations are exact, exactly solvable, and that field anomalous dimensions vanish. Theories with non-trivial anomalous dimensions may also arise under conditions that are identified. We further demonstrate that higher derivative interactions are inevitably induced by point-like ones, including at large-$N$. The local potential flows for fermionic theories with the most general $U(N)$ symmetric interactions are provided. For sample theories with scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector, or axial-vector interactions, we identify conformal fixed points, scaling dimensions, conformal manifolds, and quantum-induced shifts in scaling dimensions of higher derivative interactions. We also study fermion mass generation, and subleading modifications due to finite $N$ corrections. Implications for conformal field theories, and applications in condensed matter and particle physics are indicated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[67]

D’Attanasio and T

M. D’Attanasio and T. R. Morris, Large N and the Renormalization Group , Phys. Lett. B 409 (1997) 363 [ hep-th/9704094]

arXiv 1997
[1]

Metzner, M

W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden and K. Schonhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 299 [1105.5289]

arXiv 2012
[2]

Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J

J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 033001 [ 1108.4449]

arXiv 2012
[3]

Rosenstein, H.-L

B. Rosenstein, H.-L. Yu and A. Kovner, Critical Exponents of New Universality Classes , Phys. Lett. B 314 (1993) 381

1993
[4]

I. F. Herbut, Interactions and Phase Transitions on Graphene’s Honeycomb Lattice , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 146401 [ cond-mat/0606195]

arXiv 2006
[5]

Quantum Critical Behaviour in a Graphene-like Model

S. Hands and C. Strouthos, Quantum Critical Behaviour in a Graphene-Like Model , Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 165423 [ 0806.4877]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[6]

I. F. Herbut, V. Juricic and B. Roy, Theory of Interacting Electrons on the Honeycomb Lattice , Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 085116 [ 0811.0610]

arXiv 2009
[7]

Vafek and A

O. Vafek and A. Vishwanath, Dirac Fermions in Solids: from High-Tc Cuprates and Graphene to Topological Insulators and Weyl Semimetals , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 5 (2014) 83 [1306.2272]

arXiv 2014

Show all 114 references

[8]

T. O. Wehling, A. M. Black-Schaffer and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac Materials, Adv. Phys. 63 (2014) 1 [1405.5774]

2014 arXiv
[9]

Classen, I

L. Classen, I. F. Herbut, L. Janssen and M. M. Scherer, Mott Multicriticality of Dirac Electrons in Graphene, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 035429 [ 1503.05002]

2015 arXiv
[10]

Boyack, H

R. Boyack, H. Yerzhakov and J. Maciejko, Quantum Phase Transitions in Dirac Fermion Systems , Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (2021) 979 [ 2004.09414]

2021 arXiv
[11]

Parthenios and L

N. Parthenios and L. Classen, Twisted Bilayer Graphene at Charge Neutrality: Competing Orders of SU (4) Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 235120 [ 2305.06949]. 26

2023 arXiv
[12]

Biedermann and L

J. Biedermann and L. Janssen, Twist-tuned quantum criticality in moir´ e bilayer graphene, 2412.16042

arXiv
[13]

K. G. Wilson, Quantum Field Theory Models in Less Than Four-Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2911

1973
[14]

Parisi, The Theory of Nonrenormalizable Interactions

G. Parisi, The Theory of Nonrenormalizable Interactions. 1. the Large N Expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 100 (1975) 368

1975
[15]

Eguchi, A New Approach to Collective Phenomena in Superconductivity Models , Phys

T. Eguchi, A New Approach to Collective Phenomena in Superconductivity Models , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2755

1976
[16]

Shizuya, 1/N Expansion and the Theory of Composite Particles , Phys

K.-i. Shizuya, 1/N Expansion and the Theory of Composite Particles , Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 2327

1980
[17]

Gawedzki and A

K. Gawedzki and A. Kupiainen, Renormalizing the Nonrenormalizable , Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 363

1985
[18]

Rosenstein, B

B. Rosenstein, B. J. Warr and S. H. Park, The Four Fermi Theory is Renormalizable in (2+1)-Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1433

1989
[19]

Kikukawa and K

Y. Kikukawa and K. Yamawaki, Ultraviolet Fixed Point Structure of Renormalizable Four Fermion Theory in Less Than Four-Dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 234 (1990) 497

1990
[20]

de Calan, P

C. de Calan, P. A. Faria da Veiga, J. Magnen and R. Seneor, Constructing the Three-Dimensional Gross-Neveu Model with a Large Number of Flavor Components , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 3233

1991
[21]

Hands, A

S. Hands, A. Kocic and J. B. Kogut, Compositeness, Anomalous Dimensions and Renormalizability in Four Fermi Theories , Phys. Lett. B 273 (1991) 111

1991
[22]

Hands, A

S. Hands, A. Kocic and J. B. Kogut, Four Fermi Theories in Fewer Than Four-Dimensions , Annals Phys. 224 (1993) 29 [ hep-lat/9208022]

1993 arXiv
[23]

J. A. Gracey, Computation of Critical Exponent Eta at O(1/ N 3) in the Four Fermi Model in Arbitrary Dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994) 727 [ hep-th/9306107]

1994 arXiv
[24]

Gies and L

H. Gies and L. Janssen, UV Fixed-Point Structure of the Three-Dimensional Thirring Model , Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 085018 [ 1006.3747]

2010 arXiv
[25]

Jakov´ ac, A

A. Jakov´ ac, A. Patk´ os and P. P´ osfay,Non-Gaussian fixed points in fermionic field theories without auxiliary Bose-fields , Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 2 [ 1406.3195]

2015 arXiv
[26]

Gehring, H

F. Gehring, H. Gies and L. Janssen, Fixed-Point Structure of Low-Dimensional Relativistic Fermion Field Theories: Universality Classes and Emergent Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 085046 [1506.07570]

2015 arXiv
[27]

Dabelow, H

L. Dabelow, H. Gies and B. Knorr, Momentum Dependence of Quantum Critical Dirac Systems , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 125019 [ 1903.07388]

2019 arXiv
[28]

Cresswell-Hogg and D

C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Line of Fixed Points in Gross-Neveu Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 201602 [ 2207.10115]

2023 arXiv
[29]

Cresswell-Hogg and D

C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Critical Fermions with Spontaneously Broken Scale Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L101701 [ 2212.06815]

2023 arXiv
[30]

Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theories of Gravitation , pp

S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theories of Gravitation , pp. 790–831. 1980

1980
[31]

Reuter, Nonperturbative Evolution Equation for Quantum Gravity , Phys

M. Reuter, Nonperturbative Evolution Equation for Quantum Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 971 [hep-th/9605030]

1998 arXiv
[32]

Reuter and F

M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Renormalization Group Flow of Quantum Gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert Truncation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 065016 [ hep-th/0110054]

2002 arXiv
[33]

D. F. Litim, Fixed points of quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 201301 [ hep-th/0312114]

2004 arXiv
[34]

H. Gies, S. Rechenberger and M. M. Scherer, Towards an Asymptotic-Safety Scenario for Chiral Yukawa Systems, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 403 [ 0907.0327]

2010 arXiv
[35]

Braun, H

J. Braun, H. Gies and D. D. Scherer, Asymptotic Safety: a Simple Example , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 085012 [1011.1456]

2011 arXiv
[36]

D. F. Litim and F. Sannino, Asymptotic safety guaranteed, JHEP 12 (2014) 178 [ 1406.2337]

2014 arXiv
[37]

A. D. Bond and D. F. Litim, Theorems for Asymptotic Safety of Gauge Theories , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 429 [ 1608.00519]

2017 arXiv
[38]

A. D. Bond and D. F. Litim, Price of Asymptotic Safety , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 211601 [1801.08527]

2019 arXiv
[39]

Gies and K

H. Gies and K. K. K. Tam, Fermionic fixed-point structure of asymptotically safe QED with a Pauli term, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 477 [ 2403.02980]

2024 arXiv
[40]

Poland, S

D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and 27 Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 015002 [ 1805.04405]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Giombi and X

S. Giombi and X. Yin, The Higher Spin/Vector Model Duality , J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214003 [1208.4036]

2013 arXiv
[42]

Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians , Nucl

J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians , Nucl. Phys. B 231 (1984) 269

1984
[43]

Wetterich, Exact Evolution Equation for the Effective Potential , Phys

C. Wetterich, Exact Evolution Equation for the Effective Potential , Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 90 [1710.05815]

1993 arXiv
[44]

Ellwanger, Flow Equations for N Point Functions and Bound States , Z

U. Ellwanger, Flow Equations for N Point Functions and Bound States , Z. Phys. C62 (1994) 503 [hep-ph/9308260]

1994 arXiv
[45]

T. R. Morris, The Exact Renormalization Group and Approximate Solutions , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9 (1994) 2411 [ hep-ph/9308265]

1994 arXiv
[46]

K. G. Wilson, Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena. 1. Renormalization Group and the Kadanoff Scaling Picture , Phys. Rev. B4 (1971) 3174

1971
[47]

K. G. Wilson, Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena. 2. Phase Space Cell Analysis of Critical Behavior, Phys. Rev. B4 (1971) 3184

1971
[48]

Dupuis, L

N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier et al., The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications , Phys. Rept. 910 (2021) 1 [2006.04853]

2021 arXiv
[49]

Comellas, Y

J. Comellas, Y. Kubyshin and E. Moreno, Exact renormalization group study of fermionic theories , Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 653 [ hep-th/9512086]

1997 arXiv
[50]

D. U. Jungnickel and C. Wetterich, Effective action for the chiral quark-meson model , Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 5142 [ hep-ph/9505267]

1996 arXiv
[51]

Gies and C

H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Renormalization Flow of Bound States , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 065001 [hep-th/0107221]

2002 arXiv
[52]

Gies and C

H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Universality of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in gauge theories , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 025001 [ hep-th/0209183]

2004 arXiv
[53]

H. Gies, J. Jaeckel and C. Wetterich, Towards a renormalizable standard model without fundamental Higgs scalar, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 105008 [ hep-ph/0312034]

2004 arXiv
[54]

J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisation group , Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 2831 [hep-th/0512261]

2007 arXiv
[55]

Aoki and D

K.-I. Aoki and D. Sato, Weak Solution Method of the Non-Perturbative Renormalization Group Equation to Describe Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Its Application to Beyond the Ladder Analysis in QCD , in Kmi-Gcoe Workshop on Strong Coupling Gauge Theories in the Lhc Persp...

2014 arXiv
[56]

Jakovac and A

A. Jakovac and A. Patkos, Local Potential Approximation for the Renormalization Group Flow of Fermionic Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 065008 [ 1306.2660]

2013 arXiv
[57]

Aoki, S.-I

K.-I. Aoki, S.-I. Kumamoto and D. Sato, Weak Solution of the Non-Perturbative Renormalization Group Equation to Describe Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking , PTEP 2014 (2014) 043B05 [1403.0174]

2014 arXiv
[58]

G. P. Vacca and L. Zambelli, Multimeson Yukawa Interactions at Criticality , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 125003 [ 1503.09136]

2015 arXiv
[59]

H. Gies, P. Heinzel, J. Laufk¨ otter and M. Picciau, Quantum field theories of relativistic Luttinger fermions, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 065001 [ 2312.12058]

2024 arXiv
[60]

Hubbard, Calculation of Partition Functions , Phys

J. Hubbard, Calculation of Partition Functions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 3 (1959) 77

1959
[61]

R. L. Stratonovich, On a Method of Calculating Quantum Distribution Functions , Soviet Physics Doklady 2 (1957) 416

1957
[62]

Moshe and J

M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory in the Large N Limit: a Review , Phys. Rept. 385 (2003) 69 [ hep-th/0306133]

2003 arXiv
[63]

F. J. Wegner and A. Houghton, Renormalization group equation for critical phenomena , Phys. Rev. A 8 (1973) 401

1973
[64]

Ma, Introduction to the Renormalization Group , Rev

S.-k. Ma, Introduction to the Renormalization Group , Rev. Mod. Phys. 45 (1973) 589

1973
[65]

J. F. Nicoll, T. S. Chang and H. E. Stanley, Exact and Approximate Differential Renormalization Group Generators, Phys. Rev. A 13 (1976) 1251

1976
[66]

Chang, D

T. Chang, D. Vvedensky and J. Nicoll, Differential renormalization-group generators for static and dynamic critical phenomena , Physics Reports 217 (1992) 279. 28

1992
[68]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, On gauge invariant Wilsonian flows , in Workshop on the Exact Renormalization Group, pp. 168–185, 9, 1998, hep-th/9901063

1998 arXiv
[69]

D. F. Litim, Universality and the renormalisation group , JHEP 07 (2005) 005 [ hep-th/0503096]

2005 arXiv
[70]

T. R. Morris, Equivalence of local potential approximations , JHEP 07 (2005) 027 [ hep-th/0503161]

2005 arXiv
[71]

D. F. Litim and M. J. Trott, Asymptotic safety of scalar field theories , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 125006 [1810.01678]

2018 arXiv
[72]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Perturbation theory and renormalization group equations , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 081701 [ hep-th/0111191]

2002 arXiv
[73]

D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Completeness and consistency of renormalisation group flows , Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025030 [ hep-th/0202188]

2002 arXiv
[74]

Freire, D

F. Freire, D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge invariance and background field formalism in the exact renormalization group , Phys. Lett. B 495 (2000) 256 [ hep-th/0009110]

2000 arXiv
[75]

D. F. Litim, Mind the Gap , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 2081 [ hep-th/0104221]

2001 arXiv
[76]

D. F. Litim, Derivative expansion and renormalization group flows , JHEP 11 (2001) 059 [hep-th/0111159]

2001 arXiv
[77]

D. F. Litim and D. Zappala, Ising exponents from the functional renormalisation group , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 085009 [ 1009.1948]

2011 arXiv
[78]

Balog, H

I. Balog, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, M. Marohnic and N. Wschebor, Convergence of Nonperturbative Approximations to the Renormalization Group , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 240604 [ 1907.01829]

2019 arXiv
[79]

Baldazzi, K

A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth and B. Knorr, Robustness of the derivative expansion in Asymptotic Safety, 2312.03831

arXiv
[80]

Bornholdt and C

S. Bornholdt and C. Wetterich, Average action for models with fermions , Z. Phys. C 58 (1993) 585

1993
[81]

Jaeckel and C

J. Jaeckel and C. Wetterich, Flow equations without mean field ambiguity , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 025020 [hep-ph/0207094]

2003 arXiv
[82]

Weinberg, Effective Field Theories in the Large N Limit, Phys

S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theories in the Large N Limit, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2303 [hep-th/9706042]

1997 arXiv
[83]

Jaeckel, Effective Actions for Strongly Interacting Fermionic Systems , other thesis, 9, 2003

J. Jaeckel, Effective Actions for Strongly Interacting Fermionic Systems , other thesis, 9, 2003

2003
[84]

J. F. Nicoll, T. S. Chang and H. E. Stanley, Approximate Renormalization Group Based on the Wegner-Houghton Differential Generator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 540

1974
[85]

G. R. Golner, Nonperturbative Renormalization Group Calculations for Continuum Spin Systems , Phys. Rev. B 33 (1986) 7863

1986
[86]

R. D. Ball, P. E. Haagensen, J. I. Latorre and E. Moreno, Scheme Independence and the Exact Renormalization Group, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 80 [ hep-th/9411122]

1995 arXiv
[87]

Litim and N

D. Litim and N. Tetradis, Approximate Solutions of Exact Renormalization Group Equations , hep-th/9501042

arXiv
[88]

Tetradis and D

N. Tetradis and D. F. Litim, Analytical Solutions of Exact Renormalization Group Equations , Nucl. Phys. B 464 (1996) 492 [ hep-th/9512073]

1996 arXiv
[89]

Comellas and A

J. Comellas and A. Travesset, O (N) Models Within the Local Potential Approximation , Nucl. Phys. B 498 (1997) 539 [ hep-th/9701028]

1997 arXiv
[90]

T. R. Morris and M. D. Turner, Derivative Expansion of the Renormalization Group in O(N ) Scalar Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 509 (1998) 637 [ hep-th/9704202]

1998 arXiv
[91]

D. F. Litim, Optimization of the Exact Renormalization Group , Phys. Lett. B486 (2000) 92 [hep-th/0005245]

2000 arXiv
[92]

D. F. Litim, Optimized Renormalization Group Flows , Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 105007 [hep-th/0103195]

2001 arXiv
[93]

D. F. Litim, Critical Exponents from Optimized Renormalization Group Flows , Nucl. Phys. B631 (2002) 128 [ hep-th/0203006]

2002 arXiv
[94]

D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories , Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 3235

1974
[95]

Nambu and G

Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. 1., Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345

1961
[96]

Nambu and G

Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with 29 Superconductivity. II, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 246

1961
[97]

W. A. Bardeen, C. T. Hill and M. Lindner, Minimal Dynamical Symmetry Breaking of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 1647

1990
[98]

W. E. Thirring, A Soluble Relativistic Field Theory? , Annals Phys. 3 (1958) 91

1958
[99]

R. F. Dashen and Y. Frishman, Four Fermion Interactions and Scale Invariance , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2781

1975
[100]

Cresswell-Hogg and D

C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Scale symmetry breaking and generation of mass at quantum critical points, JHEP 07 (2024) 066 [ 2311.16246]

2024 arXiv
[101]

’t Hooft, Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking , NATO Sci

G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking , NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135

1980
[102]

Cresswell-Hogg and D

C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Fermion mass generation without symmetry breaking , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 065014 [ 2406.00100]

2024 arXiv
[103]

Cresswell-Hogg, D

C. Cresswell-Hogg, D. F. Litim and R. Zwicky, Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom , 2502.00107

arXiv
[104]

Acknowledgements

to complement the bootstrap programme [105–107]. Acknowledgements. This work has been supported by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) under the Consolidated Grant No. T/X000796/1, and by a CERN Associateship. Appendix A: Completeness of Pointlike Interaction ...
[105]

J. L. Cardy, Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics . Cambridge University Press, 1996

1996
[106]

W. Chen, Y. Makeenko and G. W. Semenoff, Four fermion theory and the conformal bootstrap , Annals Phys. 228 (1993) 341 [ hep-th/9301069]

1993 arXiv
[107]

Karateev, P

D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, M. Serone and A. Vichi, Fermion Conformal Bootstrap in 4d , JHEP 06 (2019) 088 [ 1902.05969]

2019 arXiv
[108]

R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Gross-Neveu-Yukawa archipelago, JHEP 02 (2023) 036 [ 2210.02492]

2023 arXiv
[109]

Cvitanovic, Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie’s, and Exceptional Groups

P. Cvitanovic, Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie’s, and Exceptional Groups . Princeton University Press, 5, 2020

2020
[110]

Sch¨ afer and E

T. Sch¨ afer and E. V. Shuryak,Instantons in QCD , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 323 [hep-ph/9610451]

1998 arXiv
[111]

C. C. Nishi, Simple Derivation of General Fierz-Like Identities , Am. J. Phys. 73 (2005) 1160 [hep-ph/0412245]

2005 arXiv
[112]

Huang, M

L. Huang, M. Kawaguchi, Y. Maitiniyazi, S. Matsuzaki, A. Tomiya and M. Yamada, Functional renormalization group study of a four-fermion model with CP violation: implications to spontaneous CP violation models , 2411.07027

arXiv
[113]

Wetterich, Spinors in Euclidean Field Theory, Complex Structures and Discrete Symmetries , Nucl

C. Wetterich, Spinors in Euclidean Field Theory, Complex Structures and Discrete Symmetries , Nucl. Phys. B 852 (2011) 174 [ 1002.3556]

2011 arXiv
[114]

B. S. DeWitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 5, 2012, 10.1017/CBO9780511564000

2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [67]

D’Attanasio and T

M. D’Attanasio and T. R. Morris, Large N and the Renormalization Group , Phys. Lett. B 409 (1997) 363 [ hep-th/9704094]

arXiv 1997

[2] [1]

Metzner, M

W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden and K. Schonhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 299 [1105.5289]

arXiv 2012

[3] [2]

Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J

J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories , J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 033001 [ 1108.4449]

arXiv 2012

[4] [3]

Rosenstein, H.-L

B. Rosenstein, H.-L. Yu and A. Kovner, Critical Exponents of New Universality Classes , Phys. Lett. B 314 (1993) 381

1993

[5] [4]

I. F. Herbut, Interactions and Phase Transitions on Graphene’s Honeycomb Lattice , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 146401 [ cond-mat/0606195]

arXiv 2006

[6] [5]

Quantum Critical Behaviour in a Graphene-like Model

S. Hands and C. Strouthos, Quantum Critical Behaviour in a Graphene-Like Model , Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 165423 [ 0806.4877]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008

[7] [6]

I. F. Herbut, V. Juricic and B. Roy, Theory of Interacting Electrons on the Honeycomb Lattice , Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 085116 [ 0811.0610]

arXiv 2009

[8] [7]

Vafek and A

O. Vafek and A. Vishwanath, Dirac Fermions in Solids: from High-Tc Cuprates and Graphene to Topological Insulators and Weyl Semimetals , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 5 (2014) 83 [1306.2272]

arXiv 2014