Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Algebraic interpretation of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle: the pentagonal way

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle are overlaps between two representation bases of the rank two Jacobi algebra J_2, and the pentagonal subalgebra structure of J_2 explains why their expansions under variable permutations…

desk verdict An elegant overlap interpretation of bivariate Jacobi polynomials via a new rank-two Jacobi algebra, but the load-bearing representation theory is imported from the companion preprint, so the result is conditional on that source. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07949 v1 pith:NZNDXW2J submitted 2025-09-09 math.RT

Nicolas Crampé , Quentin Labriet , Lucia Morey , Satoshi Tsujimoto , Luc Vinet , Alexei Zhedanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RT MSC 33C5033C45
keywords two-variableJacobipolynomialsranktwoalgebrarepresentationbasesoverlapcoefficientsRacahpentagonalsubalgebrastructureorder-threesymmetrydihedralgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle, a classical family of bivariate orthogonal polynomials, arise naturally as overlap coefficients between two representation bases of a single algebraic object: the rank two Jacobi algebra $\mathcal{J}_2$. Specifically, the overlap $\langle n,k;a,b,c|x,y\rangle$ equals, up to the normalization factor $\sqrt{x^a y^b (1-x-y)^c / (N_k^{(b,c)} N_{n-k}^{(a,b+c+2k+1)})}$, the polynomial $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$. This puts the polynomials' bispectral properties on an algebraic footing. The same framework, organized in a pentagonal graph of rank one Jacobi and Racah subalgebras, explains why permuting the variables and parameters turns the polynomials into expansions with Racah polynomial coefficients, and why the three natural families cycle under the order-three symmetry of the triangle. The result unifies the bivariate polynomials, their Racah-type expansions, and the triangle's dihedral symmetry into one representation-theoretic picture.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rank two Jacobi algebra $\mathcal{J}_2$, a quadratic algebra with five generators $X_1, X_3, L_1, L_3, L$ whose defining relations are collected in Appendix A. The load-bearing mechanism is its pentagonal subalgebra structure: the five maximal abelian subalgebras -- the commuting pairs $(X_1,X_3)$, $(X_1,L_1)$, $(L_1,L)$, $(L,L_3)$, $(L_3,X_3)$ -- sit at the vertices of a pentagon, and each edge consists of two generators that generate a rank one Jacobi algebra centrally extended by the common element; the base edge $(L_1,L_3)$ generates a centrally extended rank one Racah algebra. The argument computes overlaps between eigenbases of adjacent vertices: rank one representation theory gives univariate Jacobi polynomials (or Racah polynomials for the base) as the elementary overlaps, and convoluting along the two sides of the pentagon via resolutions of the identity yields the bivariate Jacobi polynomials. The hypergeometric transformation (2.15) and the orthogonality (1.3) of the univariate Jacobi polynomials supply the analytic identities that pin down the normalization factors.

What would settle it

Substitute the right-hand side of equation (4.7) into the eigenvalue equations (4.1) and (4.2) using the differential realization (B.1)-(B.5) for generic parameters $a,b,c>-1$ and indices $n\ge k\ge 0$; a single failure of these identities -- or a numerical check of the orthogonality integral (1.5) against the product $N_k^{(b,c)}N_{n-k}^{(a,b+c+2k+1)}$ -- would refute the characterization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Proposition 1: for the rank two Jacobi algebra $\mathcal{J}_2$ with parameters $a,b,c$, the overlap between the orthonormal basis $\{|x,y\rangle\}$ of joint eigenvectors of $X_1$ and $X_3$ and the basis $\{|n,k;a,b,c\rangle\}$ of joint eigenvectors of $L$ and $L_1$ is $$\langle n,k;a,b,c|x,y\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{x^a y^b (1-x-y)^c}{$N_k^{{(b,c)}}$ N_{n-k}^{(a,b+c+2k+1)}}}\, J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y).$$ The proof telescopes through the intermediate basis $\{|x,k;b,c\rangle\}$, using that successive pairs of generators form rank one Jacobi algebras whose eigenbasis overlaps are univariate Jacobi polynomials. The same construction, with the intermediate basis attached to $L_3$ rather than $L_1$, yields the permuted family $J_{n,k}^{(c,b,a)}(1-x-y,y)$ (Proposition 2), and the overlap between the two bottom bases is an orthonormalized Racah polynomial (equation (5.2)). It follows that the expansion of one bivariate family into the other has Racah coefficients (Proposition 3), recovering a result obtained earlier through different methods. The paper closes by showing that the three families obtained by the reflections of the triangle form a closed cycle under the dihedral group $D_3$, with the change-of-basis matrices given by Racah functions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper takes from the companion preprint [19] the validity of the defining relations of $\mathcal{J}_2$ (Appendix A) and of the symmetrizable representation (Appendix B), in particular the fact that the listed commuting pairs generate exactly the stated centralizers; if that structural assertion fails, the overlap computations of Section 4 and the Racah expansions of Sections 5 and 6 have no algebraic foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bivariate Jacobi polynomials $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$ are characterized, up to normalization, by the representation theory of $\mathcal{J}_2$; their orthogonality and bispectrality follow from the symmetrizability of the generators and the unitarity of the change of basis.
  • The expansion of the permuted family $J_{n,k}^{(c,b,a)}(1-x-y,y)$ in the standard basis has Racah polynomial coefficients (Proposition 3), giving a representation-theoretic proof of this expansion formula.
  • The three families $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$, $J_{n,k}^{(c,b,a)}(1-x-y,y)$, and $J_{n,k}^{(b,a,c)}(y,x)$ form a closed orbit under the dihedral group $D_3$, with the change-of-basis matrices expressed through orthonormalized Racah functions (Corollaries 1 and 2).
  • The convolution identity (5.14), which expresses a Racah polynomial as an integral of two bivariate Jacobi polynomials, is the continuum analogue of the Biedenharn-Elliott pentagon identity for Racah coefficients.
  • Because the representation is symmetrizable, the normalization constants in the overlap formula coincide with the square roots of the weight/norm factors of the bivariate polynomials, tying the algebraic normalization to the analytic one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pentagonal subalgebra graph is probably the rank-two instance of a general pattern: higher-rank Jacobi algebras should have their subalgebra webs encoded by higher-dimensional polytopes, with overlap computations factoring through their faces. This is a testable extension the paper only hints at.
  • The same overlap mechanism should adapt to the q-deformed two-variable polynomials mentioned in the conclusion, replacing the rank one Jacobi algebra by the corresponding q-algebra; if so, this would extend the representation-theoretic proof of bispectrality to the q and q=-1 settings.
  • The Racah-kernel expansion (5.10) amounts to an orthogonal discrete transform on the triangle, which could be exploited numerically as a spectral method on triangular domains, in the spirit of existing spectral element bases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an algebraic interpretation of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle as overlaps between representation bases of a rank-two Jacobi algebra J_2. The authors introduce a pentagonal diagram whose five vertices correspond to maximal abelian subalgebras; each edge is associated either with a rank-one Jacobi algebra or, for the bottom edge, with a rank-one Racah algebra. Using known overlap formulas for these rank-one algebras, Proposition 1 derives the explicit expression (4.7) for the overlaps between the bases {|x,y>} and {|n,k;a,b,c>}, recovering the standard product formula for J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y). Proposition 2 gives the analogous formula for the permuted family J_{n,k}^{(c,b,a)}(1-x-y,y). Section 5 shows that the change of basis between the two bottom bases is expressed by Racah polynomials, recovering a result of Dunkl. Section 6 extends the picture to the full D_3 symmetry of the simplex, introducing the third family J_{n,k}^{(b,a,c)}(y,x) and deriving the corresponding Racah expansions. The defining relations of J_2 and the differential/difference representations used in the paper are placed in Appendices A and B, with most representation-theoretic facts taken from the companion preprint [19].

Significance. If the structural facts about J_2 imported from [19] are valid, the paper gives a clean representation-theoretic explanation of the product structure of two-variable Jacobi polynomials and of the Racah-polynomial expansions under the symmetries of the triangle. The pentagonal subalgebra organization is a nice organizing principle, and the explicit overlap computations in Propositions 1, 2, and 4 are carried out in detail. The paper also makes concrete contact with the Biedenharn-Elliott identity and with Dunkl's earlier results. The main caveat is that the load-bearing representation-theoretic input --- the consistency of the defining relations, the completeness and orthonormalizability of the joint eigenbases, and the centralizer maximality claims --- is asserted from the companion preprint [19] rather than proved or precisely stated here. The central derivation is therefore conditional on external results by the same authors.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, list (3.1)] The assertion that the centralizer of each generator is exactly the two-element subalgebra listed in (3.1) is stated as a direct consequence of Appendix A, but the relations (A.1)-(A.29) only provide commutator identities; they do not by themselves prove that no further independent central elements exist in the enveloping algebra. The subsequent derivations in Section 4 and 5 rely on this maximality through the resolutions of the identity (4.6), (4.24), and (5.8) over the intermediate bases, and through the rank-one identifications (3.4), (3.7), (3.10), and (3.13). If a centralizer contained additional independent elements, these resolutions could omit contributions and the overlap formula (4.7) would not follow. Please either prove the centralizer statement or import it from [19] with an explicit theorem reference.
  2. [Appendix B and Section 4] The existence, orthonormalizability, and completeness of the joint eigenbases {|x,y>}, {|n,k;a,b,c>}, and the intermediate bases are assumed throughout Section 4. Appendix B states in B.3 that all generators are symmetrizable and that the conjugated operators are hermitian, but the verification and the spectral completeness of the differential and difference realizations are delegated to [19]. Since Proposition 1 is proved by inserting resolutions of the identity in these bases, the proof is conditional on those representation-theoretic facts. Please include precise statements from [19] that supply (i) the orthonormal joint eigenbases, (ii) the joint spectra used in (4.1)-(4.5), and (iii) completeness of the continuous and discrete spectral decompositions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.5)] The eigenvalue of L_1 on |x,k;b,c> is written as -k(k+b+c), but consistency with (3.7) and with the rank-one Jacobi spectrum (2.9) requires -k(k+b+c+1). The subsequent use of the Jacobi polynomials J_k^{(b,c)} and their normalization N_k^{(b,c)} corresponds to the corrected eigenvalue.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.31)] The eigenvalue displayed for K_1 on |n,k;a,b,c>_π has a sign error: it should be -(n-k)(n-k+a+b+c+2k+2), not (n-k)[(n-k)-a+b+c+2k+2]. This is needed for the identification of the degree n-k in (4.32), although the final formula of Proposition 2 is correct after the sign is fixed.
  3. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.35)] The factor (x+y)^{2k} appears to be (x+y)^k after combining (4.28) and (4.33); the displayed exponent 2k would make the expression inconsistent with (4.25) and with the definition (1.1). Please check and correct this exponent.
  4. [General notation] The permuted families J_{n,k}^{(c,b,a)}[(1-x-y),y] and J_{n,k}^{(b,a,c)}(y,x) would be clearer if each occurrence were explicitly expanded via (1.1), since the ordering of arguments is central to Propositions 2 and 4.
  5. [Minor typographical issues] There are several typos: 'varialex' in Section 4.1 should be 'variable'; 'simultaleous' in the caption of Figure 4 should be 'simultaneous'; reference [39] gives the year '19955', which should be '1995'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The rank-two Jacobi algebra J2 is imported from the same-authors companion [19], where it was built from the bispectral properties of the very polynomials that Proposition 1 claims to characterize; the central overlap result therefore largely reverses the construction data.

  1. self definitional [Section 1, paragraph beginning 'It is with this motivation...'; Appendix B, first sentence]
    "It is with this motivation, that some of us recently undertook to propose an explicit definition of the rank two Jacobi algebra J2 through a model derived directly from the bispectral properties of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials [19]. The goal here is to proceed in reverse and to show how the bivariate Jacobi polynomials can be characterized from the knowledge of the algebra and its representations. ... Most results are taken from [19] where they are proved."

    The defining relations of J2 and the representations used in Section 4 are not proved in this paper; they are taken from the same-authors companion [19], and that companion is described as having built J2 directly from the bispectral properties of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials. The differential realization (B.1)-(B.5) and difference realization (B.6)-(B.10) encode exactly the differential equation and recurrence relations of those polynomials. Proposition 1 then computes the overlap between the joint eigenbases of these operators and finds the same two-variable Jacobi polynomials. This is a check that the model reproduces the data from which it was constructed, rather than an independent derivation of the polynomials from first principles.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3, equation (3.1); proof of Proposition 1, equations (4.6) and (4.24)]
    "From (A.1), it is seen that the centralizer of every element of the generating set of J2 is two-generated. For each element, their generators are: L1 : {L,X1} ... "

    The proof of (4.7) relies on resolutions of the identity (4.6), (4.24), and (5.8) over the intermediate bases {|x,k;b,c>} and {|(1-x-y),k;a,b>}. Those resolutions are complete only if the listed centralizers are exactly two-generated and maximal abelian. The paper asserts this by saying 'it is seen' from the relations in Appendix A, but those relations themselves come from the same-authors companion [19], and no proof of the centralizer-generation claim or of the maximal-abelian property is given in the present paper. The proof also requires invertibility of X1-I and X3-I in (3.7) and (3.13).

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Proposition 1, is mathematically derived from the rank-one Jacobi overlap formula (2.16) once the J2 subalgebra identifications of Section 3 are accepted. The problem is that the defining relations and the explicit symmetrizable representation of J2 are not proved in the paper; they are stated, in the Introduction and Appendix B, to come from the same-authors companion [19], where J2 was defined 'through a model derived directly from the bispectral properties of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials.' Thus the eigenbases, eigenvalues, and operators used in the proof of (4.7) encode the bispectral properties of the very polynomials that are claimed to be characterized. The derivation therefore has a substantial self-definitional component: it recovers the two-variable Jacobi polynomials from an algebra that was built out of their differential and difference equations. The Racah-expansion result of Section 5 is also obtained by applying this same imported structure, and the paper itself notes that the expansion was already obtained by Dunkl [17]. This does not make the algebra incorrect, but it means the central 'characterization' is not an independent proof from first principles; it is a reverse-engineering of input data. The score is set at 7 rather than 8 because there is genuine internal work in organizing the subalgebras into a pentagon and in reducing the bivariate overlaps to univariate Jacobi and Racah overlaps, but the load-bearing structural facts remain external and same-author.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on the structure relations of J_2 and on a specific representation, both taken from the companion preprint [19]. The standard representation theory of rank-one Jacobi and Racah algebras is used as an external tool. No parameters are fitted; the parameters a,b,c are inherited from the polynomial family.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Defining relations of J_2 (Appendix A) are consistent and complete.
    The rank two Jacobi algebra is defined by these relations, taken from the companion preprint [19]; consistency is not proved here.
  • domain assumption The representation of Appendix B is a faithful, symmetrizable representation of J_2 with the stated spectra.
    All overlap computations in Section 4 assume this representation; its verification is delegated to [19].
  • standard math Standard representation theory of rank one Jacobi and Racah algebras (Sections 2.1-2.2) gives the overlap formulas for univariate polynomials.
    These are established results from the literature [11,12,20,22,24,25].
  • domain assumption The bases {|x,y>}, {|n,k>}, {|x,k>} and their permuted variants are complete and orthonormalizable with the stated inner products.
    Orthonormality is enforced by the normalization factors chosen in (4.12) and (4.18); completeness is assumed in the resolutions of the identity (4.6) and (4.24).
invented entities (1)
  • Rank two Jacobi algebra J_2
    purpose: Algebraic framework whose subalgebra structure organizes the two-variable Jacobi polynomials and their symmetries.
    Introduced in the companion preprint [19] by the same authors as a model derived from the bispectral properties of the target polynomials; no external falsifiable handle independent of this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebraic interpretation of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle: the pentagonal way." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NZNDXW2J

@misc{pith2026250907949,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebraic interpretation of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle: the pentagonal way},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NZNDXW2J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07949}
}
abstract

The rank two Jacobi algebra $\mathcal{J}_2$ is used to provide an interpretation of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$ on the triangle, as overlaps between two representation bases. The subalgebra structure of $\mathcal{J}_2$ depicted via a pentagonal graph is exploited to find the explicit expression of the two-variable functions in terms of univariate Jacobi polynomials. It is also seen to provide an explanation for the fact that the expansion on the basis $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$ of the polynomials obtained from the latter by permuting the variables $x,y, z=1-x-y$ and the parameters $(a,b,c)$ is given in terms of Racah polynomials. The underlying order-three symmetry is discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07949 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two generators around the same vertex commute; two ele￾ments at the boundaries of the same solid line generate a Jacobi algebra of rank one and L1, L3 at the boundaries of the dashed edge generate a Racah algebra of rank one. The knowledge of the spectra of the corresponding operators in representations of the rank one Jacobi algebra specifies the possible values of x and y. The range of x is 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and, due to t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The left hand side of the pentagon of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. which depicts the algebraic underpinning of the alternate two-variable polynomials. X3, X1 L3, X3 L, L3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This pentagon has the two-variable Jacobi polynomials J (a,b,c) n (x, y) associated, like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The right hand side of the pentagon of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This diagram depicts the symmetry of order three of the algebraic description of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials. Its detailed explanation is given in Subsection 6.4. The two other families of two-variable Jacobi polynomials that were introduced and charac￾terized …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Realization embeddings of the rank two Racah algebra into the rank two Jacobi algebra

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rank-two Racah algebra is realized inside the rank-two Jacobi algebra through tridiagonalization, with eigenfunctions and overlaps given by Jacobi, Wilson, and Tratnik polynomials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    The rank two Jacobi algebra

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The rank two Jacobi algebra. ArXiv:2507.07766

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Number 155

    Charles F Dunkl and Yuan Xu.Orthogonal polynomials of several variables. Number 155. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [2]

    Sur une famille de polynˆ omes ` a deux variables orthogonaux dans un triangle.Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences, 245(26):2459–2461, 1957

    Joseph Proriol. Sur une famille de polynˆ omes ` a deux variables orthogonaux dans un triangle.Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences, 245(26):2459–2461, 1957

    1957

  4. [3]

    Two-variable analogues of the classical orthogonal polynomials

    Tom Koornwinder. Two-variable analogues of the classical orthogonal polynomials. InTheory and application of special functions, pages 435–495. Elsevier, 1975

    work page 1975

  5. [4]

    Spectral methods on triangles and other domains.Journal of Scientific Computing, 6:345–390, 1991

    Moshe Dubiner. Spectral methods on triangles and other domains.Journal of Scientific Computing, 6:345–390, 1991

    work page 1991

  6. [5]

    Oxford University Press, 2005

    George Karniadakis and Spencer J Sherwin.Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, 2005

    2005

  7. [6]

    Orthogonal polynomials in two variables.Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 76:325–376, 1967

    Herbert L Krall and Isador M Sheffer. Orthogonal polynomials in two variables.Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 76:325–376, 1967

    work page 1967

  8. [7]

    On some two-dimensional analogues of classical orthogonal polynomials.Latv

    GK Engelis. On some two-dimensional analogues of classical orthogonal polynomials.Latv. mat. ezhegodnik, 15:169–202, 1974

    work page 1974

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Two-Dimensional Krall–Sheffer Polynomials and Quantum Systems on Spaces with Constant Curvature.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 65:83–94, 2003

    Luc Vinet and Alexei Zhedanov. Two-Dimensional Krall–Sheffer Polynomials and Quantum Systems on Spaces with Constant Curvature.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 65:83–94, 2003

    2003

  2. [9]

    Symmetry algebra for the generic superintegrable system on the sphere.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(2), 2018

    Plamen Iliev. Symmetry algebra for the generic superintegrable system on the sphere.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(2), 2018. 30 CRAMP ´E, LABRIET, MOREY, TSUJIMOTO, VINET, ZHEDANOV

    2018

  3. [10]

    Hidden symmetry

    Alexei S Zhedanov. “Hidden symmetry” of Askey-Wilson polynomials.Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 89(2):1146–1157, 1991

    1991

  4. [11]

    Superintegrability in two dimensions and the Racah–Wilson algebra.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 104:931–952, 2014

    Vincent X Genest, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Superintegrability in two dimensions and the Racah–Wilson algebra.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 104:931–952, 2014

    2014

  5. [12]

    The Racah algebra and superintegrable models

    Vincent X Genest, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Racah algebra and superintegrable models. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 512, page 012011. IOP Publishing, 2014

    2014

  6. [13]

    Two linear transformations each tridiagonal with respect to an eigenbasis of the other.Linear algebra and its applications, 330(1-3):149–203, 2001

    Paul Terwilliger. Two linear transformations each tridiagonal with respect to an eigenbasis of the other.Linear algebra and its applications, 330(1-3):149–203, 2001

    2001

  7. [14]

    A higher rank Racah algebra and theZ n 2 Laplace–Dunkl operator.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51(2):025203, 2017

    Hendrik De Bie, Vincent X Genest, Wouter van de Vijver, and Luc Vinet. A higher rank Racah algebra and theZ n 2 Laplace–Dunkl operator.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51(2):025203, 2017

    2017

  8. [15]

    Representations of the rank two Racah algebra and orthogonal multivariate polynomials.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 664:165–215, 2023

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Luc Frappat, and Eric Ragoucy. Representations of the rank two Racah algebra and orthogonal multivariate polynomials.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 664:165–215, 2023

    2023

  9. [16]

    Bispectrality of multivariable Racah–Wilson polynomials.Constructive Approximation, 31(3):417–457, 2010

    Jeffrey S Geronimo and Plamen Iliev. Bispectrality of multivariable Racah–Wilson polynomials.Constructive Approximation, 31(3):417–457, 2010

    2010

  10. [17]

    Orthogonal polynomials with symmetry of order three.Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 36(4):685–717, 1984

    Charles F Dunkl. Orthogonal polynomials with symmetry of order three.Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 36(4):685–717, 1984

    1984

  11. [18]

    A difference equation and Hahn polynomials in two variables.Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 92(1):57–71, 1981

    Charles F Dunkl. A difference equation and Hahn polynomials in two variables.Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 92(1):57–71, 1981

    1981

  12. [20]

    Tridiagonalization of the hypergeometric operator and the Racah–Wilson algebra.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 144(10):4441– 4454, 2016

    Vincent Genest, Mourad Ismail, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Tridiagonalization of the hypergeometric operator and the Racah–Wilson algebra.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 144(10):4441– 4454, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    The Higgs and Hahn algebras from a Howe duality perspective.Physics Letters A, 383(14):1531–1535, 2019

    Luc Frappat, Julien Gaboriaud, Luc Vinet, St´ ephane Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Higgs and Hahn algebras from a Howe duality perspective.Physics Letters A, 383(14):1531–1535, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Mutual integrability, quadratic algebras, and dynamical symmetry.Annals of Physics, 217(1):1–20, 1992

    Yakov I Granovskii, Igor M Lutzenko, and Alexei S Zhedanov. Mutual integrability, quadratic algebras, and dynamical symmetry.Annals of Physics, 217(1):1–20, 1992

    1992

  15. [23]

    McGraw-Hill, 1953

    Arthur Erd´ elyi.Higher Transcendental Functions, volume I, Based in Part on Notes Left by Harry Bateman and Compiled by the Staff of the Bateman Manuscript Project. McGraw-Hill, 1953

    1953

  16. [24]

    Finite-dimensional irreducible modules of the Racah algebra at characteristic zero.SIGMA

    Hau-Wen Huang and Sarah Bockting-Conrad. Finite-dimensional irreducible modules of the Racah algebra at characteristic zero.SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications, 16:018, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Springer, 2010

    Roelof Koekoek, Peter A Lesky, and Ren´ e F Swarttouw.Hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. Springer, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    Realisations of Racah algebras using Jacobi operators and convo- lution identities.Advances in Applied Mathematics, 153:102620, 2024

    Quentin Labriet and Lo¨ ıc Poulain d’Andecy. Realisations of Racah algebras using Jacobi operators and convo- lution identities.Advances in Applied Mathematics, 153:102620, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    An identity satisfied by the Racah coefficients.Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 31(1-4):287–293, 1952

    Lawrence C Biedenharn. An identity satisfied by the Racah coefficients.Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 31(1-4):287–293, 1952

    1952

  20. [28]

    Theoretical studies in nuclear structure v

    James Philip Elliott. Theoretical studies in nuclear structure v. the matrix elements of non-central forces with an application to the 2 p-shell.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 218(1134):345–370, 1953

    1953

  21. [29]

    Introduction to Leonard pairs.Journal of Computational and Applied mathematics, 153(1- 2):463–475, 2003

    Paul Terwilliger. Introduction to Leonard pairs.Journal of Computational and Applied mathematics, 153(1- 2):463–475, 2003

    2003

  22. [30]

    FactorizedA2-Leonard pair.The Ramanujan Journal, 66(2):25, 2025

    Nicolas Cramp´ e and Meri Zaimi. FactorizedA2-Leonard pair.The Ramanujan Journal, 66(2):25, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Classical and quantum conformal field theory.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 123(2):177–254, 1989

    Gregory Moore and Nathan Seiberg. Classical and quantum conformal field theory.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 123(2):177–254, 1989

    1989

  24. [32]

    Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups

    Nicolai Reshetikhin and Vladimir G Turaev. Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Inventiones mathematicae, 103(1):547–597, 1991

    1991

  25. [33]

    de Gruyter, 2010

    Vladimir G Turaev.Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds. de Gruyter, 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    Two-variable orthogonal polynomials of big q-Jacobi type.Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 233(6):1554–1561, 2010

    Stanis law Lewanowicz and Pawe l Wo´ zny. Two-variable orthogonal polynomials of big q-Jacobi type.Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 233(6):1554–1561, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Two-variable−1 Jacobi polynomials

    Vincent X Genest, Jean-Michel Lemay, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Two-variable−1 Jacobi polynomials. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 26(6):411–425, 2015

    2015

  28. [36]

    The Askey–Wilson algebra and its avatars.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(6):063001, 2021

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Luc Frappat, Julien Gaboriaud, Lo¨ ıc Poulain d’Andecy, Eric Ragoucy, and Luc Vinet. The Askey–Wilson algebra and its avatars.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(6):063001, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Dunkl shift operators and Bannai–Ito polynomials.Ad- vances in Mathematics, 229(4):2123–2158, 2012

    Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Dunkl shift operators and Bannai–Ito polynomials.Ad- vances in Mathematics, 229(4):2123–2158, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    The Bannai-Ito algebra and some applications

    Hendrik De Bie, Vincent X Genest, Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Bannai-Ito algebra and some applications. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 597, page 012001. IOP publishing, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Exact solvabilityof the Calogero and Sutherland models.Modern Physics Letters A, 10(29):2213–2221, 19955

    Wener R¨ uhl and Alexander Turbiner. Exact solvabilityof the Calogero and Sutherland models.Modern Physics Letters A, 10(29):2213–2221, 19955

  32. [40]

    Racah algebras, the centralizer Zn(sl2)and its Hilbert-Poincar´ e series.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 23:2657–2682, 2022

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Julien Gaboriaud, Lo¨ ıc Poulain d’Andecy, and Luc Vinet. Racah algebras, the centralizer Zn(sl2)and its Hilbert-Poincar´ e series.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 23:2657–2682, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    The Racah algebra of rank 2: Properties, symmetries and representation

    Sarah Post and S´ ebastien Bertrand. The Racah algebra of rank 2: Properties, symmetries and representation. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications, 20:085, 2024. ALGEBRAIC INTERPRETATION OF THE TWO-VARIABLE JACOBI POLYNOMIALS 31 CNRS - Universit...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.