Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 53 of 53 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2508.16757.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2508.16757 v1

Coverage vector

measured 53 of 53 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z

measured 54 of 54 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

53 of 53 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact3
  • verified fuzzy1
  • unresolved49
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation bfa1163e-f440-481a-8aed-1c3d324bc3c3 · outbound

This paper cites RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.986360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.214253Z digest=sha256:91ece4a08e7dfe1bf38556aeef840e3ab7f6bd65663c4559d4149c215a4569b1

Observation 23bd47cb-e809-4cfb-8e98-82f7510790ba · outbound

This paper cites Generator-Retriever-Generator Approach for Open-Domain Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Generator-Retriever-Generator Approach for Open-Domain Question Answering

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.218967Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.218967Z digest=sha256:56ad43b06a6e96ee9ee365de648a8b32f0e0cca84cfda3e5eb7a7a29405ba925

Observation 0091b7ee-df6a-4a8b-87b6-025d1e210d23 · outbound

This paper cites Abdelgwad, and Adam Jatowt.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Abdelgwad, and Adam Jatowt

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.216329Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.223773Z digest=sha256:fbcb807b7c99657afeafcd353f5e3236b6f88288e501790151ef802d91d61ca7

Observation 54aa36f5-8d2d-431a-a00d-d2f89cff084f · outbound

This paper cites ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval

Reference 4

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.949456Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.227865Z digest=sha256:a9bc4b9d02cba69989e211d8f1c36586102093c8d0a1cd84d7626c25794f526f

Observation 7213cb4a-6e40-4fba-8859-f7306b185329 · outbound

This paper cites Rankify: A Comprehensive Python Toolkit for Retrieval, Re-Ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Rankify: A Comprehensive Python Toolkit for Retrieval, Re-Ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.232104Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.232104Z digest=sha256:efa2c37b089d080067dac53c85ec853729f35a466ccba401a460cdfca435f692

Observation 8089e7b7-b184-4a6b-80d2-2e29719e774c · outbound

This paper cites TempRetriever: Fusion-based Temporal Dense Passage Retrieval for Time-Sensitive Questions.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models TempRetriever: Fusion-based Temporal Dense Passage Retrieval for Time-Sensitive Questions

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.236419Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.236419Z digest=sha256:74d36b01c6eea7d2bfca345cbe5e061f503d6b1ac19d51ff70a65ab3007f2985

Observation 2ac80b61-252d-4050-b95f-b1f671da9f70 · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.240952Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.240952Z digest=sha256:5de917b2a2269fcd6e71f824ac795f691bb1f53fb31ed9c57c55512289eba0fe

Observation 31aa87bd-e47b-4849-bbc4-81f1d4323bb4 · outbound

This paper cites InPars: Data Augmentation for Information Retrieval using Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models InPars: Data Augmentation for Information Retrieval using Large Language Models

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.244567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.244567Z digest=sha256:8be42092b994ec87241e6c6918b5bf04b764bc9e2e9ffd2cf3627ccfe0774031

Observation 9e01a550-a841-47aa-89f4-01b7870c4aa3 · outbound

This paper cites Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.248431Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.248431Z digest=sha256:18f7157aec87c28644f396599f066c6f04be327bd53cd66f184db682c55eca0a

Observation 05841dfe-128f-40fb-8cb4-7837ea77ed7c · outbound

This paper cites Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.252429Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.252429Z digest=sha256:7021e1c5416f2fe6138b09d83537941e63f963097af79c34d4026f5f037568a1

Observation 7ffb1c9a-8245-4a0b-bcec-aef4e54cfadc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.202210Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.256484Z digest=sha256:01a59f103c59eb0b53d550106c72472c1a0f601e4f88ab653ac0b9d479ccc4ce

Observation f863deb5-4b7b-432d-a8f3-bad916be3ef6 · outbound

This paper cites Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.260444Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.260444Z digest=sha256:0455556854718aa75fa0a1b142f633974c9d883182ab055f675c9a5fb4bb8fc5

Observation 77276f47-a299-416c-b4f7-ba76b150ad97 · outbound

This paper cites Calibration of Pre-trained Transformers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Calibration of Pre-trained Transformers

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.264309Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.264309Z digest=sha256:f581498d3eb01d3ff83f30cc2434d6548f1edfe20c797c5147c8f5641ba6f735

Observation c892fb2f-fef9-4940-93fd-8bd5e4b05bdd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.268059Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.268059Z digest=sha256:316b2cd21da99d686298c9a98002b053d3a5c1c7cedbcaecf3f7989de3e03451

Observation 942fec91-8a57-4fbe-8680-c55f2cc687e8 · outbound

This paper cites Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.271643Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.271643Z digest=sha256:cd811c64b14f63e82538cf0e2ac05776043e07b63cf3a131126f0013c8b404ca

Observation 62cde85a-f37c-4ac6-b554-5a848a051b02 · outbound

This paper cites ComplexTempQA:A 100m Dataset for Complex Temporal Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ComplexTempQA:A 100m Dataset for Complex Temporal Question Answering

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.275605Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.275605Z digest=sha256:1ea221f55c8bfd422b2d3a06be6a8916037079037ca87c992d1d003373b31887

Observation a88aacd8-5d3b-4c5d-b1d6-7c35231fde31 · outbound

This paper cites LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.279206Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.279206Z digest=sha256:858864b505cb47f7864c9f00f3dcdeae0a2f416f8d4c2a5b450d2d4e2d6c9c6e

Observation a6f757f4-4a98-44fe-a810-32d5771a962a · outbound

This paper cites LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.283254Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.283254Z digest=sha256:76cdd1a44d12588e1d640af7d5903a6cb1f6136ff5999a9934342f4939353ab4

Observation 9c9bcc95-5c4a-430f-ae64-403988a1b2d9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.287461Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.287461Z digest=sha256:96456262e9fbad5c1cc0b0811959f38ccf8b66a6e139fdd63a621055a38ae4af

Observation de076d88-154b-45ad-843a-3b8699de1ba7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.291076Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.291076Z digest=sha256:c4406e10bbd8c22983ef5982245fbf7678162edaf6628c60254418a404e88124

Observation c7ad41e8-1f04-46e6-8722-87f661da9613 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.159811Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.294554Z digest=sha256:7598cf3f4ab1279c396bde99ad807f3b4ac08ef7936fadbc8107da00a0ad4f11

Observation 8426a61a-f140-4c58-acb1-854efb905654 · outbound

This paper cites u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.298290Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.298290Z digest=sha256:b19f383d1715a56ddf552ba569831b02f505e584e378f82ada18f441ec9e25cd

Observation dd6aacdb-2d54-4a43-95c7-6f3f05ad92b7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.135770Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.301994Z digest=sha256:66c9ffcdd3ba17c0a56ca4869db23893c5fd76a0959271e86ba91d577997cb35

Observation a31b9590-6392-410e-9e66-c77f1f0b98e6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.121107Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.305541Z digest=sha256:3462fdc82a83fea4d7378a517c75fd5c378c90c54a6e7e0945dfbc04dc156c01

Observation b03c0e8c-77d2-484a-ac7c-6fd8d1b78cf1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.310224Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.310224Z digest=sha256:3ad40d9f0f5bc7308b3fa453ad0ababe361676ffd00cb8c67ad92239205cf3b7

Observation a4f180b9-8387-4fef-a57c-b3d0f102b746 · outbound

This paper cites Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.313737Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.313737Z digest=sha256:7295eb2864c1849aa8fe43cef97bc1e6ca1f3f042286a98c3b4ecebb7b9fca27

Observation 9f5e0e86-2e0f-4747-89b9-79f171d125f2 · outbound

This paper cites RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.317839Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.317839Z digest=sha256:32b86fe1feb0e62bb5d506f11e5e39c03933f590b10a28172afae5404ec3ee0d

Observation 6f21cfb0-fbc8-4123-ad5d-c23b3c2d827d · outbound

This paper cites Exploring Hint Generation Approaches in Open-Domain Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Exploring Hint Generation Approaches in Open-Domain Question Answering

Reference 28

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.718703Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.321615Z digest=sha256:007aba37cfe25d80dd7602c082cdfd4e867d7244920ab745f0856605f8ff723c

Observation 8db80740-a756-44dc-9abf-01a303ffdb1c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.096639Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.325436Z digest=sha256:baafa4509a98ea9c9e235cedcb1ad7117cb1bc82f3c1ce41baabc2184bf8bd91

Observation cfbd882d-01d6-40ea-820a-e161e0b2d502 · outbound

This paper cites Passage Re-ranking with BERT.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Passage Re-ranking with BERT

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.329225Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.329225Z digest=sha256:fb63bea4a6b847eb1b395be9afd68a5e4747f34bc42ba76b40b64f946572cfb3

Observation a07b3e0e-c406-4a0f-aa7f-7b44a461ea40 · outbound

This paper cites Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.333064Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.333064Z digest=sha256:9bdb3240bf30729e44bfba5414151abdaecf159725759393a9308f773aa2cb6f

Observation 863a2112-37d2-4c06-8dec-bd05cf731058 · outbound

This paper cites RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Models

Reference 32

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.336832Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.336832Z digest=sha256:fa3cae78f771805d26936a4f35c4872356f80564b6c7d840585b8fa45f7ac938

Observation 7b8c2880-0d3a-4bb2-9f71-4bdd82d095f2 · outbound

This paper cites RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.340516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.340516Z digest=sha256:460f2c6fd8da7bba9ec2e807b2c44334d41d5793cb72c5a1c48787e94831c124

Observation b3c644a5-8c76-42e3-8592-f47a90a4098b · outbound

This paper cites Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting

Reference 34

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.344412Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.344412Z digest=sha256:ce0bd287a8255476c3bca1764ba252d72d7492bd6141236e19efe7d1ae84b261

Observation 7bf3b6e5-7fdc-4612-8616-f1aa84875851 · outbound

This paper cites EcoRank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-ranking Using Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models EcoRank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-ranking Using Large Language Models

Reference 35

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.348348Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.348348Z digest=sha256:afb9cbec64dcc77b6be942ad5c4e773b31018f0b4d97bf8c6b232739b5a1c61c

Observation 75dd6802-1c72-4b8e-8606-491611149dea · outbound

This paper cites FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding

Reference 36

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.352432Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.352432Z digest=sha256:b35bb76efe9ad07f225338f750e479e67c6e1bd70e59675033b7b21fee507c93

Observation f71f28c1-f1a6-4e61-ab41-3cdce5021d4b · outbound

This paper cites Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation

Reference 37

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.356287Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.356287Z digest=sha256:67a91f764507cc4ecf982ea6d3ee27a91fa398d527cd9c359ca3bd09e9264a87

Observation 300c1050-3903-4cd8-a3d5-dc7bee20849e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 38

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.080554Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.360009Z digest=sha256:9be95b4d21fbb4efb59baa3208f80abbe8857312b5fb38aae67131d973649324

Observation b22c933a-d9f4-4024-8c0f-bf3f1665e240 · outbound

This paper cites Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents

Reference 39

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.363545Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.363545Z digest=sha256:c2d4fc286a16bf9132c395223d068d001c86df6b3fa7f819cff84c68dd2e4896

Observation 4ce76377-8243-45a1-aa11-147c6d5c2fd0 · outbound

This paper cites Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Models

Reference 40

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.367334Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.367334Z digest=sha256:b1231ee3288c2c42a7e9d9928fba6011fe4c3996f8c3caf3454bb02ca489895b

Observation c00d3269-cc29-42a2-83d0-48e167ea6f91 · outbound

This paper cites BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models

Reference 41

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.371011Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.371011Z digest=sha256:76198b64f728c2069d2494422306ad78711ceb09df87a6cf8c2786743d534d51

Observation 541b3d8c-4e6f-4aff-bfd4-9d8b13b59ff5 · outbound

This paper cites Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers

Reference 42

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.374649Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.374649Z digest=sha256:395edbefa4a10171362fe33d126f9a88d133c53f93a67d16881804b67ca38da6

Observation 4f6309a1-76d3-4938-86b5-2c7f69e84060 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 43

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.066691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.380223Z digest=sha256:1ce057d1e33cace581df245e4498123aa96f5f4a467db6a3dcd416116b9a4bbd

Observation 7e34c48b-04aa-41d8-ac88-5faa755c050a · outbound

This paper cites ListT5: Listwise Reranking with Fusion-in-Decoder Improves Zero-shot Retrieval.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ListT5: Listwise Reranking with Fusion-in-Decoder Improves Zero-shot Retrieval

Reference 44

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.383780Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.383780Z digest=sha256:23f2c7d38543ab5151386db59cdb660f8c5151862e43a9a1d3bcecce1dabf079

Observation a07d5f22-9a29-422a-af58-ffd4a220a242 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 45

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.387516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.387516Z digest=sha256:981213c051db4e228baf09bef0534e40eb9a45e043cfef5628899fe89801744a

Observation 47abec7d-6c94-45f0-9274-fff2a78206eb · outbound

This paper cites Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators

Reference 46

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.391228Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.391228Z digest=sha256:046e048d5fa40a9c341ccbba4865b79068d6eff7951a4029a6e7668ad672ea61

Observation ee1e32b8-0349-492d-be3e-5dbd0034c27c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 47

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.051641Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.395055Z digest=sha256:0e4cc246cd8a6a9f56fa70350bbcfcded4d1250150ef0111394662851b83675a

Observation 6b9a6a77-7eb3-4206-af5b-52b8f33acfd8 · outbound

This paper cites Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey

Reference 48

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.398507Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.398507Z digest=sha256:7e074d898e1781036d87b1267fd53c99db703f3c2930f12fff0245c7e25ab415

Observation f7294ef5-c64b-44ff-9152-1ecf1040aba2 · outbound

This paper cites Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labels.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labels

Reference 49

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.402548Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.402548Z digest=sha256:6b0b419dcc913dcc0decf465b8cbd4a1ddd3564ecd6a8617ed802c0ecdd80f69

Observation 1639bbfe-9ead-4b95-a795-289404d194c3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 50

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.036075Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.406387Z digest=sha256:afacde587499b85a31ace343ce77ea545b1e42af7938fb95d5536f421d6ba3b9

Observation 58334d42-7bc1-4e68-8801-000eb0c85a65 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 51

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.021669Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.410192Z digest=sha256:e51978e34e144076072cc4808f2a0aa6961602db5ee7939ac1f633c68f6bf4d6

Observation 3652fe1e-2724-45fd-9a8e-87e84b16ae1e · outbound

This paper cites online" 'onlinestring :=.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models online" 'onlinestring :=

Reference 52

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.414061Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.414061Z digest=sha256:2d99c2354970dfb220284a0a3a952e90b71397e49c22be7127d359e29885470d

Observation ec2ac2bb-17e1-47cf-95a9-af91958392db · outbound

This paper cites write newline.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models write newline

Reference 53

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z digest=sha256:53278c470b69bf0192e80f5a316fca2c3c5dae2078fe4014af746044250cabeb

Pith citing papers

Observation aa2ebf22-f909-4802-990e-d4fe29397e0d · inbound

Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments cites this paper.

Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z digest=sha256:8ecfbd56fd28f038b6ade01b8cef2b09e7cc3fc4b6ec668b283999c4455e251d