Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient estimation of longitudinal treatment effects using difference-in-differences and machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16234 v1 pith:O6A73RNP submitted 2024-06-23 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords paralleltreatmenttrendsconditionalcovariatesefficientmeantime-varying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Difference-in-differences is based on a parallel trends assumption, which states that changes over time in average potential outcomes are independent of treatment assignment, possibly conditional on covariates. With time-varying treatments, parallel trends assumptions can identify many types of parameters, but most work has focused on group-time average treatment effects and similar parameters conditional on the treatment trajectory. This paper focuses instead on identification and estimation of the intervention-specific mean - the mean potential outcome had everyone been exposed to a proposed intervention - which may be directly policy-relevant in some settings. Previous estimators for this parameter under parallel trends have relied on correctly-specified parametric models, which may be difficult to guarantee in applications. We develop multiply-robust and efficient estimators of the intervention-specific mean based on the efficient influence function, and derive conditions under which data-adaptive machine learning methods can be used to relax modeling assumptions. Our approach allows the parallel trends assumption to be conditional on the history of time-varying covariates, thus allowing for adjustment for time-varying covariates possibly impacted by prior treatments. Simulation results support the use of the proposed methods at modest sample sizes. As an example, we estimate the effect of a hypothetical federal minimum wage increase on self-rated health in the US.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pulling back the curtain: the road from statistical estimand to machine-learning based estimator for epidemiologists (no wizard required)

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A didactic derivation of an EIF-based estimator and a rate double robustness proof for the mean outcome under no treatment, aimed at applied epidemiologists.

Pith tools