Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 98 references

Shockingly Effective: Cluster Winds as Engines of Feedback in Starburst Galaxy VV 114

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the starburst merger VV 114, resolved star clusters inject at least $1.6\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$, matching about 70% of the galaxy's shock luminosity and powering its superwind.

desk verdict A data-rich case that cluster winds matter in VV 114, but the headline 70% share rests on an unverified identification of [S II] densities with the hot CC85 wind. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16624 v1 pith:O7YGGVCY submitted 2025-06-19 astro-ph.GA

Justin A. Kader , Vivian U , Jeffrey A. Rich , Marina Bianchin , Sean T. Linden , Anne M. Medling , Tanio Diaz-Santos , George C. Privon
show 24 more authors
Rosalie McGurk Lee Armus Loreto Barcos-Munoz Gabriela Canalizo Vassilis Charmandaris Aaron S. Evans Tianmu Gao Justin Howell Hanae Inami Thomas Lai Kirsten L. Larson Matthew A. Malkan Maria Sanchez-Garcia Christopher D. Martin Mateusz Matuszewski Claire E. Max Joseph M. Mazzarella James D. Neill Nikolaus Z. Prusinski Raymon Remigio David Sanders Yiqing Song Sabrina Stierwalt Jason Surace
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords VV114luminousinfraredgalaxiesgalacticfeedbackstarclustersclusterwindsinterstellarshockssuperwindintegralfieldspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that in the merging, infrared-luminous starburst VV 114, the dominant engine of feedback is the population of resolved young star clusters, not primarily the buried AGN or the tidal dynamics of the merger. Using wide-field integral-field spectroscopy, it separates every emission line into a narrow photoionized component and a broad component whose line ratios and kinematics match radiative shocks. Around individual clusters, radial electron-density profiles follow the predictions of adiabatically expanding cluster winds; summing the fitted energy-injection rates gives $\sum\dot{E}_T \gtrsim 1.6\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$, about 70% of the total shock luminosity. This budget agrees with independent estimates from soft-band X-rays and from the star-formation rate, and it also matches the kinetic energy needed to drive the observed $\sim$4 kpc galactic superwind bubble. If correct, this is a resolved, quantitative demonstration that starburst clusters can dominate feedback energetics in a luminous infrared galaxy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the CC85 model of a steady-state, spherically expanding adiabatic wind: within an injection radius $R_{\rm sc}$, massive stellar winds and supernovae deposit energy $\dot{E}_T$ and mass $\dot{M}_T$ into a hot, overpressurized fluid, and outside $R_{\rm sc}$ the density falls as $1/r^2$. The paper fits these predicted density profiles to [S II] electron densities measured around each cluster, fixing the terminal wind velocity at 2000 km s$^{-1}$ while leaving $\dot{E}_T$ and $R_{\rm sc}$ free; summing the fitted $\dot{E}_T$ values yields the 70% figure. A second mechanism, the shock-mixing sequence, linearly interpolates between H II-region photoionization models and radiative shock models to assign each spatial pixel a shock fraction $f_{\rm shock}$ and a shock velocity, which is what connects the broad emission component to cluster-driven shocks.

What would settle it

Measure the same radial electron-density profiles around star clusters that lack young massive stars and around control positions with no cluster: if identical declining profiles appear, the CC85 attribution is wrong. Alternatively, high-spatial-resolution X-ray spectroscopy that resolves the hot gas around a single cluster and finds a density profile inconsistent with $1/r^2$, or a gas temperature far below the $10^7$-$10^8$ K wind, would refute the model fits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the resolved star-cluster population of VV 114 supplies the dominant share of the galaxy's shock energy. The authors fit the CC85 adiabatic spherical wind model to [S II] electron-density profiles around 66 of the 180 cataloged clusters and, after summing the best-fit energy-injection rates, obtain $\sum\dot{E}_T \gtrsim 1.6\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Comparing this with the total shock luminosity $L_{\rm shock}=2.3\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ derived from the broad H$\alpha$ component leads to the conclusion that at least 70% of the shock luminosity is driven by star clusters. The same total agrees with the mechanical energy injection rate estimated from the soft-band X-ray luminosity ($\sim2\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$) and with Starburst99 predictions from the star-formation rate ($1.4\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$). A blueshifted broad component across most of the galaxy and a $\sim$4 kpc bubble in the shock-fraction maps, coincident with the soft X-ray emission, are interpreted as a galactic superwind whose kinetic energy injection rate ($1.2\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ for $n_e=100$ cm$^{-3}$) agrees with the summed cluster winds, confirming the starburst as the wind's power source.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the [S II] electron-density profiles around clusters trace the hot, adiabatically expanding cluster-wind fluid rather than warmer photoionized gas; if the profiles instead trace photoionization structure, unresolved shells, or the ambient ISM geometry, the fitted mechanical energy rates and the 70% figure lose their physical meaning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 70% figure holds, the resolved star clusters are the primary feedback engine in VV 114, contributing more shock energy than the AGN or the merger dynamics.
  • The galactic superwind's energy budget is closed by cluster winds: the kinetic energy injection rate of the $\sim$4 kpc bubble matches $\sum\dot{E}_T$, implying the starburst alone drives the outflow.
  • The estimated shock dissipation timescale for the $10^{10}\,M_\odot$ molecular reservoir, roughly 40 Myr against a 140 Myr dynamical time, implies shocks can drain the gas of rotational support and drive it inward, potentially fueling a future starburst.
  • The [Fe II]/Pa$\beta$ ratio is shown to be a dust-penetrating shock diagnostic whose spatial pattern tracks the optical line-ratio maps, extending shock mapping into heavily obscured regions.
  • For clusters with flat density profiles the fitted injection radii and energy rates are lower limits, so the true total cluster energy input may exceed $1.6\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-matching assumption holds, a direct prediction is that the diffuse hot wind around clusters should be detectable in X-ray emission lines with surface-brightness profiles following the same $1/r^2$ falloff, a test the current galaxy-wide X-ray data cannot yet make.
  • Applying the same CC85 fitting procedure to other LIRGs with HST cluster catalogs would test whether the 70% figure is a general property of starburst mergers or specific to VV 114; the paper's X-ray and star-formation cross-checks provide a template for that survey.
  • The anticorrelation between shock fraction and cluster surface density suggests wind-wind collisions in the interstitial gas, rather than each cluster independently shocking the ambient medium; high-resolution simulations of clustered winds could discriminate these geometries.
  • Because the optical IFU misses the most heavily embedded feedback, the 70% may be a lower bound on the starburst's true contribution: near-IR [Fe II] mapping reveals shocked gas hidden behind $A_V>6$ screens whose energy source remains ambiguous.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents KCWI and MUSE IFU spectroscopy of the local luminous infrared merger VV 114, together with HST narrow-band imaging, and argues that resolved young star clusters are the dominant feedback engine. The authors decompose optical emission lines into a narrow (C1) and broad (C2) component, associate C2 with radiative shocks via diagnostic line-ratio mixing sequences, find an anticorrelation between shock fraction and cluster surface density, and fit CC85 adiabatic wind models to [S II]-derived radial electron density profiles around 66 clusters. Summing the fitted energy injection rates gives ΣĖ_T ≳ 1.6×10^43 erg s^-1, quoted as 70% of L_shock, and this value is compared with independent estimates from soft X-ray luminosity, SFR-scaled Starburst99 models, and the kinetic energy of the proposed galactic superwind. The paper concludes that cluster winds and supernovae power most of the shock luminosity and drive the superwind in VV 114.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is an important empirical demonstration that a resolved young cluster population, rather than an AGN or tidal dynamics alone, can supply most of the mechanical energy driving shocks and a galactic superwind in a LIRG. The study makes good use of a rich dataset: high-resolution KCWI and MUSE spectroscopy, stringent δBIC>1000 selection of the broad component, a transparent shock-mixing framework built from MAPPINGS grids, a published HST cluster catalog, and multiple cross-checks of the energy budget against X-ray and SFR-scaled expectations. The paper is therefore significant for feedback studies and for connecting cluster-scale energy injection to galaxy-scale outflows. The headline 70% number, however, rests on a chain of model-dependent conversions, in particular the identification of [S II] density profiles with the hot CC85 wind fluid and a fixed 2000 km/s velocity used in both the cluster-wind fits and the superwind energy budget; the quantitative claim needs revision or additional tests before it can be accepted at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (4)–(13)] The central quantity ΣĖ_T is obtained by fitting the CC85 adiabatic wind solution to electron density profiles measured from the [S II] doublet at T_e = 10^4 K, using single-component fluxes that mix the C1 and C2 kinematic components. The model density in Eqs. (9)–(13) is the mass density of the hot (10^7–10^8 K) wind fluid, and no physical relation is supplied between that fluid and the warm [S II]-emitting gas, such as pressure equilibrium, a filling factor, or an entrainment/cooling model. If the observed r^-2 profiles are set by photoionization stratification, the ambient ISM distribution, or unresolved shells rather than by the wind, the fitted Ė_T values and the 70% comparison to L_shock lose their physical meaning. A re-fit using only C2 fluxes, or an explicit multiphase model, is needed to support the headline claim.
  2. [§4.2 (L_shock conversion)] The total shock luminosity is estimated as L_shock = 75 × L_Hα,C2, assuming an average shock velocity of 160 km/s from Rich et al. (2010). No uncertainty or sensitivity is quoted for this conversion, even though the C2 line widths and the inferred shock velocities in Figure 9 span roughly 100–500 km/s. Because L_shock is the denominator of the headline 70% share, the authors should quantify how L_shock and the resulting cluster-wind fraction vary when the shock velocity distribution implied by their own C2 measurements is used instead of a single value.
  3. [§4.4.1 and §4.2] The superwind kinetic energy budget uses v_exp = 2000 km/s, identical to the terminal velocity v_inf fixed in all CC85 cluster-wind fits. For a fixed observed density profile, the fitted Ė_T scales approximately as v_inf^3 through Eqs. (9)–(13), and the wind kinetic luminosity Ė_kin = E_kin/t_dyn scales as v_exp^3 for fixed bubble radius and mass. The close agreement between Ė_kin ≈ 1.2×10^43 erg/s and ΣĖ_T ≈ 1.6×10^43 erg/s is therefore partly by construction. The independent comparisons with the soft X-ray and SFR-derived mechanical luminosities are not affected, but the statement that the superwind 'is confirmed' to be driven by the starburst should be softened or supported by fits with different fixed velocities or an independently measured wind speed.
  4. [§4.1.2 and Fig. 8 (right panels)] The anticorrelation between shock fraction and local cluster surface density may be partly produced by the definition of f_shock in Eq. (3): R_mix = (1−f_shock) R_HII + f_shock R_shock. Near clusters, strong HII-region photoionization will lower the inferred f_shock even if the absolute shock emission per unit volume is spatially constant. The authors should verify the trend using the absolute C2 shock luminosity, or by estimating f_shock from C2-only line ratios, before interpreting the anticorrelation as evidence for shocks concentrated in interstitial regions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2 (last paragraph)] The text reads 'the infrared bolometric luminosity of VV 114 is L_IR = 4.5×10^11 M⊙'; the units should be L⊙, not M⊙.
  2. [§3.3] The shock model grid is described as having 'a preshock density of 1 cm−1'; this appears to be a typo for 1 cm^−3.
  3. [§4.2 and Tables A1/A2] The treatment of the lower-limit fits flagged with '≥' in Tables A1 and A2 should be stated explicitly: the summation of ΣĖ_T should give the sum both with lower-limit values treated as point values and with them treated as lower bounds, so the reader can see how the 70% figure depends on this choice.
  4. [§2.5 and Fig. 4] The histograms and the analysis use δBIC cut based on Hα for selecting spaxels, but the C2 [OIII] and [OII] measurements are drawn from the same spaxels; please justify that the Hα-based BIC selection does not bias the higher-ionization C2 line ratios and kinematics.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Main 70% cluster-wind share rests on independent CC85 fits and external X-ray/SFR checks, but the superwind 'confirmation' reuses the 2000 km/s input on both sides, making that agreement partly by construction.

  1. other [Section 4.4.1 (Galactic Superwind, Dynamical State of the Wind)]
    "Assuming a deprojected wind velocity of vexp = 2000 km s−1 (the same velocity used in the cluster wind models v∞,A), the estimated kinetic energy of the entrained ionized gas is Ekin∼8×10^58 n_e^{-1} erg."

    The superwind kinetic power is not independently calibrated: v_exp is set equal to v∞,A, which is a fixed input to the CC85 cluster-wind fits ('assumed in all our fits to be 2000 km s−1', Section 4.2). For fixed [S II]-derived density profiles, the fitted Ė_T scales as v∞^3 (Eqs. 9-13 with Ṁ_T=2Ė_T/v∞^2), while Ė_kin = E_kin/t_dyn = (1/2)M v_exp^2/(r_bubble/v_exp) also scales as v_exp^3. The shared 2000 km/s therefore cancels in the ratio Ė_kin/ΣĖ_T, so the 'close agreement' and the resulting confirmation that the superwind is starburst-driven are insensitive to the dominant uncertain velocity and are partly constructed by reusing the same input.

full rationale

The central 70% claim is not a restatement of its inputs: ΣĖ_T is obtained by fitting CC85 cluster-wind profiles to [S II]-derived radial density profiles, and the two cross-checks (soft-band X-ray mechanical energy with ε_X=1% and starburst99 SFR-based kinetic input) are independent of the Hα-based L_shock that forms the denominator of the 70% comparison. The shock-fraction/cluster-density anticorrelation is also an independent empirical result. The dominant caveat is a physical modeling risk rather than a circularity: the [S II] n_e(T_e=10^4 K) profiles are warm-gas densities and are fitted directly to the hot CC85 wind-fluid density without an explicit phase relation; if the profiles are shaped by photoionization structure or unresolved shells, the fitted Ė_T values lose their wind interpretation. The only genuine construction issue is the superwind energy check, which explicitly reuses v∞=2000 km/s on both sides, so the agreement is partly invariant to that parameter. Because the central 70% claim and its X-ray/SFR support remain independent, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central energy budget rests on the CC85 wind model, the shock mixing sequence, and a set of adopted normalizations (v=2000 km/s, epsilon_X=1%, n_e=100 cm^-3) that are not independently measured. The most fragile unstated assumption is that [SII] warm-gas densities trace the hot wind fluid. The analysis introduces no new physical entities.

free parameters (7)
  • Cluster wind terminal velocity v_inf = 2000 km/s (fixed)
    Set in all CC85 fits and in the superwind kinetic energy estimate; densities then set the mass loading, and energies scale as v_inf^3.
  • Per-cluster energy injection rate E_T = 0.12e41 to 45.16e41 erg/s (Tables 1, A1, A2)
    Free parameter in each CC85 fit; the sum over clusters gives the 70% L_shock claim. Many values are lower limits for flat profiles.
  • Per-cluster injection radius R_sc = 0.26 to 1.5 kpc (Tables 1, A1, A2)
    Free parameter in each CC85 fit; for flat profiles it is set to the outermost data point, making it a lower limit.
  • Average shock velocity for L_shock conversion = 160 km/s (assumed)
    Converts L_Hα,C2 to total shock luminosity via L_shock = 75 L_Hα,C2 using Figure 11 of Rich et al. (2010).
  • Soft X-ray mechanical efficiency epsilon_X = 1% (literature range 0.4-10%)
    Converts L_X to mechanical energy injection rate; chosen because L_X/L_bol = 1e-4, making the X-ray agreement partly a consistency check.
  • Superwind electron density n_e = 100 cm^-3 (assumed)
    Adopted as close to the galaxy-wide average; E_kin and dE/dt of the outflow scale as n_e^-1.
  • Electron temperature T_e = 10^4 K (assumed)
    Used for [SII] density and ionized gas mass estimates; standard for warm ionized gas.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption CC85 steady-state, spherical, adiabatic wind model
    Used in Section 4.2 to fit electron density profiles; assumes spherical symmetry, steady flow, and that [SII] densities trace the wind fluid.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear shock mixing sequence of line ratios (Eq. 3)
    Assumes observed line ratios are a linear combination of pure HII and pure shock model ratios weighted by f_shock.
  • domain assumption MAPPINGS V photoionization and radiative shock model grids
    Grids with solar metallicity, n=1 cm^-3, B from 1e-4 to 10 microG, and v_shock 100-500 km/s are used to interpret observed line ratios.
  • domain assumption The broad C2 component is predominantly shock-ionized gas
    The interpretation of C2 as shock-dominated, and the conversion to shock luminosity, assume shocks rather than AGN or unresolved kinematics dominate.
  • domain assumption Warm ionized gas density traces the hot CC85 wind density
    Load-bearing and unstated: [SII]-derived densities at T_e=10^4 K are fit with a hot wind profile without discussing the phase mismatch.
  • domain assumption Starburst99 synthetic SEDs for HII region models
    Used to construct the ionizing spectra for the photoionization grid in Section 3.3.
  • domain assumption Star formation is evenly divided between VV 114E and VV 114W
    From Goldader et al. (2002); used to compute the SFR-based mechanical energy injection comparison.
  • standard math Standard flat cosmology with H0=69.3 km/s/Mpc
    Used for distances and physical scales; not load-bearing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shockingly Effective: Cluster Winds as Engines of Feedback in Starburst Galaxy VV 114." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7YGGVCY

@misc{pith2026250616624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shockingly Effective: Cluster Winds as Engines of Feedback in Starburst Galaxy VV 114},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7YGGVCY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16624}
}
abstract

We present high-resolution Keck Cosmic Web Imager (KCWI) and MUSE IFU spectroscopy of VV 114, a local infrared-luminous merger undergoing a vigorous starburst and showing evidence of galactic-scale feedback. The high-resolution data allow for spectral deblending of the optical emission lines and reveal a broad emission line component ($\sigma_{\rm{broad}} \sim$~100--300 km s$^{-1}$) with line ratios and kinematics consistent with a mixture of ionization by stars and radiative shocks. The shock fraction (percent ionization due to shocks) in the high velocity gas is anticorrelated with projected surface number density of resolved star clusters, and we find radial density profiles around clusters are well fit by models of adiabatically expanding cluster winds driven by massive stellar winds and supernovae (SNe). The total kinetic power estimated from the cluster wind models matches the wind+SNe mechanical energy deposition rate estimated from the soft band X-ray luminosity, indicating that at least 70\% of the shock luminosity in the galaxy is driven by the star clusters. \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} narrow band near-infrared imaging reveals embedded shocks in the dust-buried infrared nucleus of VV 114E. Most of the shocked gas is blueshifted with respect to the quiescent medium, and there is a close spatial correspondence between the shock map and the \emph{Chandra} soft band X-ray image, implying the presence of a galactic superwind. The energy budget of the superwind is in close agreement with the total kinetic power of the cluster winds, confirming the superwind is driven by the starburst.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16624 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. HST ACS/WFC three-channel optical image of VV 114. Red is the F660N image isolating Hα emission, green is the F814W (∼I band) image and blue is the F435W (∼B band) image. The tilted yellow and upright white boxes are the MUSE and KCWI fields of view, respectively. Isointensity levels of the F814W image are shown as white contours, which will also appear in all maps presented hereafter. VV 114W appears blue with pink… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Single- and double-component fits to the Hα emission line. Shown in the three panels are examples of where the statistical model comparison metric (δBIC, see Section 2.5) indicates a weak (left), moderate (middle), and strong (right) likelihood that a double-component fit is the best description of the data. In the present work, emission line profiles with δBIC < 1000 are classified as single-component lines [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the δBIC parameter measured from fits to the Hα emission line. Spaxels with SNRHα < 10 are masked (grey) and areas falling outside the combined IFU field of view are white. The blue contours are isointensity levels from the HST ACS F814W image, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Velocity dispersion distributions for the two kinematic components (C1 and C2) fitted to the Hα, [O III], and [O II] emis￾sion lines with δBIC ≥ 1000 and SNRline ≥ 10 across the entire merger. Dotted and dashed vertical lines mark the medians of the C1 and C2 distribut…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Velocity dispersion maps for the narrow (C1, top) and broad (C2, bottom) kinematic components of the Hα (left), [O III] λ5007 Å (middle), and [O II] λ3726 Å (right) emission lines with δBIC ≥ 1000 and SNRline ≥ 10. The top and bottom rows have colorbars scaled to the v…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Optical diagnostic emission line ratios with fluxes from the C1 (top) and C2 (bottom) kinematic components using spaxels with SNRline ≥ 10 and δBIC ≥ 1000. Points are colored according to velocity dispersion in the [O III] line. The black dashed and dotted lines in the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagnostic excitation diagrams as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left panels: BPT diagrams with the theoretical photoionization-shock mixing sequence represented by filled squares colored by shock fraction: dark blue corresponds to line ratios predicted from 0% shocks (100% photoionization), and dark red is 100% shocks. Measured flu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top panels are BPT diagrams for the spaxels with δBIC ≥ 1000 and SNRline ≥ 10, colored by velocity dispersion in the [O III] line. A mixing sequence is overlaid which contains line ratio predictions (filled boxes) for shock fractions of 0, 5, 20, 40, 80, and 100%, brac…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparisons between the optical and near-IR emission line ratios for areas of VV 114 covered by both MUSE and HST are shown in the left and middle panels. The solid black line is a linear regression to the [N II]/Hα vs. [Fe II]/Paβ data. The large circles outlined in …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: Map of the visual extinction toward VV 114 calculated from the Balmer decrement and adopting the Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation law (RV = 4.05). The black contours are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: C2-C1 differential heliocentric radial velocity map (left) and distribution (right), derived from fits to the Hα line in the MUSE datacube, the black contours are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Spatially resolved shock fraction for the broad compo￾nent (C2) ionized gas, traced by the optical emission line ratio [S II]/Hα, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    602C `\.=

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    J., Salim , S., Boquien , M., et al

    Agostino , C. J., Salim , S., Boquien , M., et al. 2023, , 526, 4455, 10.1093/mnras/stad3027

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3027 2023

  5. [5]

    2019, , 55, 377, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    Alarie , A., & Morisset , C. 2019, , 55, 377, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21 2019

  6. [6]

    G., Groves , B

    Allen , M. G., Groves , B. A., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., & Kewley , L. J. 2008, , 178, 20, 10.1086/589652

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  7. [7]

    M., Evans , A

    Armus , L., Mazzarella , J. M., Evans , A. S., et al. 2009, , 121, 559, 10.1086/600092

    doi:10.1086/600092 2009

  8. [8]

    R., Wuyts , S., F \"o rster Schreiber , N

    Avery , C. R., Wuyts , S., F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., et al. 2021, , 503, 5134, 10.1093/mnras/stab780

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab780 2021

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5, 10.1086/130766

    1981 doi

  2. [10]

    L., Larson , D., Weiland , J

    Bennett , C. L., Larson , D., Weiland , J. L., et al. 2013, , 208, 20, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  4. [12]

    A., van der Werf , P

    Buiten , V. A., van der Werf , P. P., Viti , S., et al. 2024, , 966, 166, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad344b

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    2017, , 466, 798, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    Cappellari , M. 2017, , 466, 798, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Charmandaris , V., Le Floc'h , E., & Mirabel , I. F. 2004, , 600, L15, 10.1086/381687

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    A., & Clegg , A

    Chevalier , R. A., & Clegg , A. W. 1985, , 317, 44, 10.1038/317044a0

    1985 doi

  9. [17]

    Chu , Y.-H., & Kennicutt , Jr., R. C. 1994, , 425, 720, 10.1086/174017

    1994 doi

  10. [18]

    A., & Sutherland , R

    Dopita , M. A., & Sutherland , R. S. 1996, , 102, 161, 10.1086/192255

    1996 doi

  11. [19]

    2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe , 10.1007/978-3-662-05866-4

    ---. 2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe , 10.1007/978-3-662-05866-4

    2003 doi

  12. [20]

    D., et al

    Doyon , R., Nadeau , D., Joseph , R. D., et al. 1995, , 450, 111, 10.1086/176123

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    Dyson , J. E. 1979, , 73, 132

    1979

  14. [22]

    G., & Elmegreen , D

    Elmegreen , B. G., & Elmegreen , D. M. 1978, , 220, 1051, 10.1086/155991

    1978 doi

  15. [23]

    S., Frayer , D

    Evans , A. S., Frayer , D. T., Charmandaris , V., et al. 2022, , 940, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9971

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    2022, , 927, 212, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    Franeck , A., W \"u nsch , R., Mart \' nez-Gonz \'a lez , S., et al. 2022, , 927, 212, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    T., Ivison , R

    Frayer , D. T., Ivison , R. J., Smail , I., Yun , M. S., & Armus , L. 1999, , 118, 139, 10.1086/300925

    1999 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Meurer , G., Heckman , T

    Goldader , J. D., Meurer , G., Heckman , T. M., et al. 2002, , 568, 651, 10.1086/339165

    2002 doi

  19. [27]

    P., Heckman , T., Hoopes , C., et al

    Grimes , J. P., Heckman , T., Hoopes , C., et al. 2006, , 648, 310, 10.1086/505680

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    M., Armus , L., & Miley , G

    Heckman , T. M., Armus , L., & Miley , G. K. 1990, , 74, 833, 10.1086/191522

    1990 doi

  21. [29]

    M., Hoopes , C

    Heckman , T. M., Hoopes , C. G., Seibert , M., et al. 2005, , 619, L35, 10.1086/425979

    2005 doi

  22. [30]

    1990, , 354, 483, 10.1086/168709

    Heiles , C. 1990, , 354, 483, 10.1086/168709

    1990 doi

  23. [31]

    F., Cox , T

    Hopkins , P. F., Cox , T. J., Hernquist , L., et al. 2013, , 430, 1901, 10.1093/mnras/stt017

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    H., Armus , L., Mazzarella , J

    Howell , J. H., Armus , L., Mazzarella , J. M., et al. 2010, , 715, 572, 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/572

    2010 doi

  25. [33]

    K., Dey , S., Ronconi , T., et al

    Humire , P. K., Dey , S., Ronconi , T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.15082, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15082

    2025 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Iono , D., Ho , P. T. P., Yun , M. S., et al. 2004, , 616, L63, 10.1086/420784

    2004 doi

  27. [35]

    E., & Raftery, A

    Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773, 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572

    1995

  28. [36]

    M., Tremonti , C., et al

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., Tremonti , C., et al. 2003, , 346, 1055, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003

  29. [37]

    J., Dopita , M

    Kewley , L. J., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., Heisler , C. A., & Trevena , J. 2001, , 556, 121, 10.1086/321545

    2001 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Groves , B., Kauffmann , G., & Heckman , T

    Kewley , L. J., Groves , B., Kauffmann , G., & Heckman , T. 2006, , 372, 961, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    2006

  31. [39]

    W., Nakamura , F., & Wu , B

    Kinoshita , S. W., Nakamura , F., & Wu , B. 2021 a , , 921, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d4b

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    2021 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.05554, 10.48550/arXiv.2108.05554

    ---. 2021 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.05554, 10.48550/arXiv.2108.05554

    2021 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    A., Soifer , B

    Knop , R. A., Soifer , B. T., Graham , J. R., et al. 1994, , 107, 920, 10.1086/116906

    1994 doi

  34. [42]

    2014, , 790, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/26

    Kreckel , K., Armus , L., Groves , B., et al. 2014, , 790, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/26

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    E., Armus , L., Knop , R

    Larkin , J. E., Armus , L., Knop , R. A., Soifer , B. T., & Matthews , K. 1998, , 114, 59, 10.1086/313063

    1998 doi

  36. [44]

    L., D \' az-Santos , T., Armus , L., et al

    Larson , K. L., D \' az-Santos , T., Armus , L., et al. 2020, , 888, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5dc3

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    2002, , 391, 417, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020784

    Le Floc'h , E., Charmandaris , V., Laurent , O., et al. 2002, , 391, 417, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020784

    2002 doi

  38. [46]

    D., et al

    Leitherer , C., Schaerer , D., Goldader , J. D., et al. 1999, , 123, 3, 10.1086/313233

    1999 doi

  39. [47]

    T., Evans , A

    Linden , S. T., Evans , A. S., Larson , K., et al. 2021, , 923, 278, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2892

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    T., Evans , A

    Linden , S. T., Evans , A. S., Armus , L., et al. 2023, , 944, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb335

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Luridiana , V., Morisset , C., & Shaw , R. A. 2013, PyNeb: Analysis of emission lines , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1304.021

    2013

  42. [50]

    1999, , 513, 142, 10.1086/306832

    Mac Low , M.-M., & Ferrara , A. 1999, , 513, 142, 10.1086/306832

    1999 doi

  43. [51]

    M., U , V., Rich , J

    Medling , A. M., U , V., Rich , J. A., et al. 2015, , 448, 2301, 10.1093/mnras/stv081

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    1979, , 228, 112, 10.1086/156827

    Melnick , J. 1979, , 228, 112, 10.1086/156827

    1979 doi

  45. [53]

    2021, , 649, A175, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937268

    Melnick , J., Tenorio-Tagle , G., & Telles , E. 2021, , 649, A175, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937268

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    2014, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol

    Morisset , C., & Delgado-Inglada , G. 2014, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 44, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 136--136

    2014

  47. [55]

    C., et al

    Morrissey , P., Matuszewski , M., Martin , D. C., et al. 2018, , 864, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    O., & Terlevich , R

    Munoz-Tunon , C., Tenorio-Tagle , G., Castaneda , H. O., & Terlevich , R. 1996, , 112, 1636, 10.1086/118129

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    Murray , N., M \'e nard , B., & Thompson , T. A. 2011, , 735, 66, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/66

    2011 doi

  50. [58]

    Naab , T., & Ostriker , J. P. 2017, , 55, 59, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019

    2017 doi

  51. [59]

    E., & Ferland , G

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  52. [60]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.05444, 10.48550/arXiv.2011.05444

    O'Sullivan , D., & Chen , Y. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.05444, 10.48550/arXiv.2011.05444

    2020 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ot \' -Floranes , H., & Mas-Hesse , J. M. 2010, , 511, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913384

    2010 doi

  54. [62]

    B., Nielsen , N

    Reichardt Chu , B., Fisher , D. B., Nielsen , N. M., et al. 2022, , 511, 5782, 10.1093/mnras/stac420

    2022 doi

  55. [63]

    S., et al

    Rich , J., Aalto , S., Evans , A. S., et al. 2023, , 944, L50, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2b8

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    A., Dopita , M

    Rich , J. A., Dopita , M. A., Kewley , L. J., & Rupke , D. S. N. 2010, , 721, 505, 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/505

    2010 doi

  57. [65]

    A., Kewley , L

    Rich , J. A., Kewley , L. J., & Dopita , M. A. 2011, , 734, 87, 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/87

    2011 doi

  58. [66]

    2015, , 221, 28, 10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/28

    ---. 2015, , 221, 28, 10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/28

    2015 doi

  59. [67]

    2013, , 430, 2002, 10.1093/mnras/stt026

    Riffel , R., Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Aleman , I., et al. 2013, , 430, 2002, 10.1093/mnras/stt026

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    A., Bianchin , M., Riffel , R., et al

    Riffel , R. A., Bianchin , M., Riffel , R., et al. 2021, , 503, 5161, 10.1093/mnras/stab788

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    S., et al

    Saito , T., Iono , D., Yun , M. S., et al. 2015, , 803, 60, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/60

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    2017, , 834, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/6

    Saito , T., Iono , D., Espada , D., et al. 2017, , 834, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/6

    2017 doi

  63. [71]

    2018, , 863, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad23b

    ---. 2018, , 863, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad23b

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    B., Mazzarella , J

    Sanders , D. B., Mazzarella , J. M., Kim , D. C., Surace , J. A., & Soifer , B. T. 2003, , 126, 1607, 10.1086/376841

    2003 doi

  65. [73]

    A., Bower , R

    Schaye , J., Crain , R. A., Bower , R. G., et al. 2015, , 446, 521, 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    Z., Evans , A

    Scoville , N. Z., Evans , A. S., Thompson , R., et al. 2000, , 119, 991, 10.1086/301248

    2000 doi

  67. [75]

    O., Matzko , W., Darden , N., Canalizo , G., & Gorjian , V

    Sexton , R. O., Matzko , W., Darden , N., Canalizo , G., & Gorjian , V. 2021, , 500, 2871, 10.1093/mnras/staa3278

    2021 doi

  68. [76]

    G., & Bland-Hawthorn , J

    Sharp , R. G., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2010, , 711, 818, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/818

    2010 doi

  69. [77]

    L., & Bland-Hawthorn , J

    Shopbell , P. L., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 1998, , 493, 129, 10.1086/305108

    1998 doi

  70. [78]

    2004, , 610, 226, 10.1086/421702

    Silich , S., Tenorio-Tagle , G., & Rodr \' guez-Gonz \'a lez , A. 2004, , 610, 226, 10.1086/421702

    2004 doi

  71. [79]

    D., Shull , J

    Slavin , J. D., Shull , J. M., & Begelman , M. C. 1993, , 407, 83, 10.1086/172494

    1993 doi

  72. [80]

    T., Neugebauer , G., & Houck , J

    Soifer , B. T., Neugebauer , G., & Houck , J. R. 1987, , 25, 187, 10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.001155

    1987

  73. [81]

    T., Neugebauer , G., Matthews , K., et al

    Soifer , B. T., Neugebauer , G., Matthews , K., et al. 2001, , 122, 1213, 10.1086/322119

    2001 doi

  74. [82]

    T., Evans , A

    Song , Y., Linden , S. T., Evans , A. S., et al. 2022, , 940, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac923b

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    R., & Hartwell , J

    Stevens , I. R., & Hartwell , J. M. 2003, , 339, 280, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06184.x

    2003

  76. [84]

    S., & Dopita , M

    Sutherland , R. S., & Dopita , M. A. 2017, , 229, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541

    2017 doi

  77. [85]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.05311, 10.48550/arXiv.1906.05311

    Swinbank , M., Harrison , C., Tiley , A., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.05311, 10.48550/arXiv.1906.05311

    2019 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    1996, , 456, 264, 10.1086/176646

    Tenorio-Tagle , G., Munoz-Tunon , C., & Cid-Fernandes , R. 1996, , 456, 264, 10.1086/176646

    1996 doi

  79. [87]

    Tenorio-Tagle , G., Munoz-Tunon , C., & Cox , D. P. 1993, , 418, 767, 10.1086/173434

    1993 doi

  80. [88]

    1981, , 195, 839, 10.1093/mnras/195.4.839

    Terlevich , R., & Melnick , J. 1981, , 195, 839, 10.1093/mnras/195.4.839

    1981 doi

  81. [89]

    A., Singh , H

    Valdes , F., Gupta , R., Rose , J. A., Singh , H. P., & Bell , D. J. 2004, , 152, 251, 10.1086/386343

    2004 doi

  82. [90]

    2001, , 368, 64, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000509

    van Driel , W., Gao , Y., & Monnier-Ragaigne , D. 2001, , 368, 64, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000509

    2001 doi

  83. [91]

    2005, , 43, 769, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    Veilleux , S., Cecil , G., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2005, , 43, 769, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    2005 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Veilleux , S., & Osterbrock , D. E. 1987, , 63, 295, 10.1086/191166

    1987 doi

  85. [93]

    2020, Nature Reviews Physics, 2, 42, 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2

    Vogelsberger , M., Marinacci , F., Torrey , P., & Puchwein , E. 2020, Nature Reviews Physics, 2, 42, 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2

    2020 doi

  86. [94]

    S., Clements , D

    Westmoquette , M. S., Clements , D. L., Bendo , G. J., & Khan , S. A. 2012, , 424, 416, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21214.x

    2012

  87. [95]

    S., Smith , L

    Westmoquette , M. S., Smith , L. J., & Gallagher , III, J. S. 2011, , 414, 3719, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18675.x

    2011

  88. [96]

    2007, , 471, 579, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077282

    W \"u nsch , R., Silich , S., Palou s , J., & Tenorio-Tagle , G. 2007, , 471, 579, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077282

    2007 doi

  89. [97]

    2011, , 740, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/75

    W \"u nsch , R., Silich , S., Palou s , J., Tenorio-Tagle , G., & Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n , C. 2011, , 740, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/75

    2011 doi

  90. [98]

    S., Scoville , N

    Yun , M. S., Scoville , N. Z., & Knop , R. A. 1994, , 430, L109, 10.1086/187450

    1994 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.