Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 172 references

A Survey on Side Information-driven Session-based Recommendation: From a Data-centric Perspective

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to be the first data-centric review of side-information-driven session-based recommendation, sorting more than sixty methods by the type of data they exploit and identifying which data types remain unused.

desk verdict Useful data-centric survey of side-information-driven session-based recommendation; the taxonomy and dataset tables are the value, and the 'first comprehensive' claim needs a more rigorous literature protocol. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12279 v1 pith:OCEFBQYT submitted 2025-05-18 cs.IR

Xiaokun Zhang , Bo Xu , Chenliang Li , Bowei He , Hongfei Lin , Chen Ma , Fenglong Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IR
keywords session-basedrecommendationsideinformationdata-centricsurveybenchmarkanalysismulti-modalsequentiallargelanguagemodelsrecommendersystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Session-based recommendation predicts an anonymous user's next action from a short stream of clicks, and it suffers from data scarcity. This survey claims that the emerging response—side-information-driven session-based recommendation (SIDSBR)—has matured enough to deserve its own map, and that the map should be drawn from the data outward: what side information exists, what each type reveals about intent, and how models encode and inject it. It presents itself as the first survey to take that data-centric view, organizing over sixty methods into a taxonomy by side-information type. A reader comes away with concrete gaps: brand, price, and review information are underexplored, no benchmark covers all information types, and side information is proposed as the main route to cold-start, explainable, and LLM-based session recommendation.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the survey's double taxonomy: side information organized by type (time, category, brand, price, text, image, address, rating, review, behavior) and injection organized by level (item, session, prompt). The type taxonomy sorts research progress so a reader can find all methods that use, say, price, while the injection taxonomy sorts the technical how—look-up embeddings for numerical data, pretrained encoders for text and images, heterogeneous graphs or hypergraphs for fused item representations, and prompt templates for LLMs. These taxonomies carry the argument: they turn the general idea that side information helps into a structured claim about which data, injected where, reveals which user intent.

What would settle it

Checking whether any dataset already in routine use covers all ten side-information types in Table I, especially both behavior and image, would settle the survey's claim that no existing benchmark supports holistic comparison of methods across information types.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that side-information-driven session-based recommendation is its own maturing topic, and that the most useful way to organize it is by the side information itself: time, category, brand, price, text, image, address, rating, review, and behavior type. It argues that conventional session-based recommendation using only item IDs can mine co-occurrence but misses user intent, while different data types reveal different intents—price signals budget sensitivity, images expose taste, and behavior type distinguishes casual browsing from purchase. On that basis the survey provides a task formulation that separates session-based recommendation from sequential recommendation, a catalogue of nineteen benchmarks and the side information each carries, an account of how each information type is encoded and injected at item, session, or prompt level, and a taxonomy of research progress by information type. It then concludes that brand, price, and reviews are under-exploited, that no existing dataset covers all the information types needed for holistic evaluation, and that side information is the main lever for cold-start, explainable, and LLM-based session-based recommendation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the literature search was broad enough: if a meaningful body of side-information-driven session-based recommendation work falls outside the chosen keywords, venues, or post-2016 window, the survey's claim to be the first comprehensive map of the topic would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A researcher who wants to use a specific side-information type, such as price or behavior type, can now locate the relevant methods and datasets in one place, which should make replication and comparison cheaper.
  • Underexplored data types—brand, price, and reviews—and the absence of a benchmark combining behavior with image information become concrete research targets rather than vague impressions.
  • Side information is framed as the main route to cold-start session recommendation, because new items can be linked to past behavior through shared features such as category or cast even without co-occurrence data.
  • LLM-based session recommenders are not yet competitive with ID-based models according to the surveyed evidence, and item text and images are identified as the leverage point for closing that gap.
  • The explicit distinction between session-based and sequential recommendation clarifies evaluation practice: SBR groups sessions for train and test splits and never uses user profiles, so sequential-recommendation methods need modification before being applied to SBR.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence of the data-centric claim is that a model's advantage from side information should grow as sessions get shorter; one could degrade sessions on the surveyed benchmarks to one or two clicks and measure whether side-information methods lose less accuracy than their ID-only counterparts.
  • The paper's examples of information conflict, such as image and text disagreement, suggest that dataset-level consistency statistics could become a benchmark quality metric, a step the survey itself does not propose.
  • The injection-level taxonomy could double as a design guide: item-level injection suits fused item representations, session-level injection suits per-modality preferences, and prompt-level injection suits text-only LLM pipelines, so a practitioner could choose a method family by which side information their production data actually contains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper surveys side-information-driven session-based recommendation (SIDSBR) from a data-centric perspective. It formulates the task, distinguishes SBR from sequential recommendation, reviews benchmark datasets and their available side information in Table I, analyzes the characteristics and utility of ten types of side information (time, category, brand, price, text, image, address, rating, review, and behavior), discusses data encoding and three injection manners (item-level, session-level, and prompt-level), summarizes neural techniques (RNN, CNN, attention, GNN, contrastive learning, and LLMs), and organizes research progress by side-information type in Table II. The authors claim that this is the first comprehensive survey of SIDSBR and identify under-explored data types, missing benchmark resources, and future directions such as joint multi-information incorporation, cold-start SBR, explainable SBR, and LLM-based SBR.

Significance. If the survey's coverage is indeed representative, it provides a valuable reference map for a fast-growing area. The data-centric organization, the explicit dataset-information matrix (Table I), and the side-information-type taxonomy (Table II) are useful resources. The paper also makes concrete, falsifiable observations, e.g., that brand, price, and review information are under-explored in SBR, and that no existing dataset covers all listed side-information types. The survey includes machine-checkable elements: the tables can be cross-verified against the reference list, and the procedural description of the literature search can be audited. However, the core contribution—the "first comprehensive survey" claim—depends on the completeness of the search protocol, which is currently underspecified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section I, Paper collection] The literature search protocol is too underspecified to support the "first comprehensive survey" claim. The protocol mentions only three keyword phrases ("session-based recommendation", "session recommendation", and "sequential recommendation"), a post-2016 cutoff, a whitelist of venues, and "selected" arXiv preprints. It does not include adjacent terminologies commonly used in this area, such as "feature-rich session-based recommendation", "attribute-aware session-based recommendation", "multi-modal session-based recommendation", or "side-information-enhanced sequential recommendation". As a result, the search may miss relevant work, and the completeness claim is not reproducible. Please operationalize the protocol: list exact query strings, databases, screening criteria, and the number of papers retrieved and excluded, or soften the "first/comprehensive" claim accordingly.
  2. [Section II-B and Table II] The criterion for including SR models in a survey titled "session-based recommendation" is stated as "the selected SR models should be effective when trained using the aforementioned SBR experimental implementations" (Section II-B), but this criterion is not operationalized, and it is not evident how Table II was populated from it. For instance, entries such as S3-Rec [68], SASRec [30], and BERT4Rec [31] are originally proposed for sequential recommendation with user profiles, and the text does not clarify under what conditions they qualify as SBR methods. This makes the boundary of the reviewed set ambiguous and further weakens the reproducibility of the survey's coverage. Please make the inclusion/exclusion decision for each category of method explicit, or provide a supplementary list of the included SR-derived methods and the justification for each.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section V-C2, Eq. (2)] The sentence "Generally, We can formulate the processing of GNN as follows" should refer to CNN, not GNN; the equation is a convolution over item embeddings, not a graph neural network update.
  2. [Section III, Instacart paragraph] The unresolved citation placeholder "[?]" in the sentence about sampling subsets must be replaced with the intended reference(s); an unresolved placeholder in a survey undermines the traceability of the claim.
  3. [Section VI-E] The model name "Reformer [160]" should be "Recformer [160]" to match the reference title ("Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation") and the entry in Table II.
  4. [Section V-C5, Eq. (5)] The contrastive loss in Eq. (5) is missing the exponential function and the logarithm; as written, it is not the standard InfoNCE objective. Please correct the formula or add a note that it is a simplified variant.
  5. [Section III, Tmall paragraph] "In addtion" should be "In addition".
  6. [Section I] The phrase "the first proposal and wide acceptance of SBR in GRU4Rec [3]" is imprecise; GRU4Rec is one of the first deep-learning SBR models, not the first proposal of session-based recommendation in general. Consider rewording to avoid a historically inaccurate statement.
  7. [Section I and Table II] The text states that "over 60 papers" are reviewed, but Table II lists approximately 53 approaches; please clarify how the 60 count is derived, e.g., whether it includes foundational SBR/SR papers cited outside Table II or papers discussed in the text but not tabled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's claims rest on its literature-collection protocol and descriptive taxonomy, not on self-citations or fitted definitions.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, so the usual circularity failure modes involving derived predictions and fitted parameters do not apply. The central claim of being the first data-centric survey of side-information-driven session-based recommendation rests on a stated literature-collection protocol (DBLP and Google Scholar, specified keywords, a venue whitelist, and post-2016 focus), which is an empirical completeness claim rather than a mathematical derivation. The taxonomy by side-information type is a descriptive organizational scheme based on the reviewed papers, not a result derived from those papers by construction. The authors cite several of their own prior methods (MMSBR, CoHHN, BiPNet, DIMO, FineRec) as items in the reviewed literature, but these are used as representative examples in Table II and Sections V-VI, not as load-bearing premises for the survey's contribution or as imported uniqueness theorems. No equation or definition in the paper reduces an output to its own input. The unresolved '[?]' citation in the Instacart paragraph and the typo in Section V-C2 labeling a CNN formula as 'processing of GNN' are editorial defects that affect clarity and completeness, but they are not instances of circular reasoning. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no mathematical parameters or new entities. Its conclusions rest on domain assumptions about taxonomy completeness, dataset representativeness, and literature collection coverage, all of which are stated or implied in the paper.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The classification of side information into time, category, brand, price, text, image, address, rating, review, and behavior types is exhaustive enough to organize the field.
    Section III and Table I partition side information into these types; if an important type such as audio, interaction context, or seller information is missing, the comprehensiveness claim weakens.
  • domain assumption A session in SBR generally contains no more than five items and is generated by splitting user sequences by time.
    Section II-B uses this distinction to separate SBR from sequential recommendation, but no distributional evidence or citation is provided for the specific thresholds.
  • domain assumption Collecting papers through DBLP and Google Scholar with the listed keywords and venue priorities yields the relevant SIDSBR literature.
    Section I 'Paper collection' defines the corpus; broader terms such as 'context-aware recommendation' or 'feature-rich session recommendation' might identify additional work not reviewed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Side Information-driven Session-based Recommendation: From a Data-centric Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCEFBQYT

@misc{pith2026250512279,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Side Information-driven Session-based Recommendation: From a Data-centric Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCEFBQYT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12279}
}
read the original abstract

Session-based recommendation is gaining increasing attention due to its practical value in predicting the intents of anonymous users based on limited behaviors. Emerging efforts incorporate various side information to alleviate inherent data scarcity issues in this task, leading to impressive performance improvements. The core of side information-driven session-based recommendation is the discovery and utilization of diverse data. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of this task from a data-centric perspective. Specifically, this survey commences with a clear formulation of the task. This is followed by a detailed exploration of various benchmarks rich in side information that are pivotal for advancing research in this field. Afterwards, we delve into how different types of side information enhance the task, underscoring data characteristics and utility. Moreover, we discuss the usage of various side information, including data encoding, data injection, and involved techniques. A systematic review of research progress is then presented, with the taxonomy by the types of side information. Finally, we summarize the current limitations and present the future prospects of this vibrant topic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12279 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conventional SBR v.s. side information-driven SBR. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The workflow of side information-driven session-based recommendation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three manners for side information injection: item-level injection, session-level injection and prompt-level injection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [68]

    S3-rec: Self-supervised learning for sequential recom- mendation with mutual information maximization,

    K. Zhou, H. Wang, W. X. Zhao, Y . Zhu, S. Wang, F. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Wen, “S3-rec: Self-supervised learning for sequential recom- mendation with mutual information maximization,” inCIKM. ACM, 2020, pp. 1893–1902

    2020

  2. [30]

    Self-attentive sequential recommenda- tion,

    W. Kang and J. J. McAuley, “Self-attentive sequential recommenda- tion,” inICDM, 2018, pp. 197–206

    2018

  3. [31]

    Bert4rec: Sequential recommendation with bidirectional encoder representations from transformer,

    F. Sun, J. Liu, J. Wu, C. Pei, X. Lin, W. Ou, and P. Jiang, “Bert4rec: Sequential recommendation with bidirectional encoder representations from transformer,” inCIKM, 2019, pp. 1441–1450

    2019

  4. [1]

    Deep learning based recom- mender system: A survey and new perspectives,

    S. Zhang, L. Yao, A. Sun, and Y . Tay, “Deep learning based recom- mender system: A survey and new perspectives,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 5:1–5:38, 2019

    2019

  5. [2]

    Neural attentive session-based recommendation,

    J. Li, P. Ren, Z. Chen, Z. Ren, T. Lian, and J. Ma, “Neural attentive session-based recommendation,” inCIKM, 2017, pp. 1419–1428

    2017

  6. [3]

    Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks,

    B. Hidasi, A. Karatzoglou, L. Baltrunas, and D. Tikk, “Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks,” inICLR, 2016

    2016

  7. [4]

    A survey on session-based recommender systems,

    S. Wang, L. Cao, Y . Wang, Q. Z. Sheng, M. A. Orgun, and D. Lian, “A survey on session-based recommender systems,”ACM Comput. Surv., pp. 154:1–154:38, 2022

    2022

  8. [5]

    Self-supervised hypergraph convolutional networks for session-based recommenda- tion,

    X. Xia, H. Yin, J. Yu, Q. Wang, L. Cui, and X. Zhang, “Self-supervised hypergraph convolutional networks for session-based recommenda- tion,” inAAAI, 2021, pp. 4503–4511

    2021

Show all 172 references
  1. [6]

    LOAM: improving long-tail session-based recommendation via niche walk augmentation and tail session mixup,

    H. Yang, Y . Choi, G. Kim, and J. Lee, “LOAM: improving long-tail session-based recommendation via niche walk augmentation and tail session mixup,” inSIGIR, 2023, pp. 527–536

    2023

  2. [7]

    Beyond co- occurrence: Multi-modal session-based recommendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, F. Ma, C. Li, L. Yang, and H. Lin, “Beyond co- occurrence: Multi-modal session-based recommendation,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2023

    2023

  3. [8]

    Disentangling ID and modality effects for session-based recommendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, Z. Ren, X. Wang, H. Lin, and F. Ma, “Disentangling ID and modality effects for session-based recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 1883–1892

    2024

  4. [9]

    Parallel recurrent neural network architectures for feature-rich session-based recommendations,

    B. Hidasi, M. Quadrana, A. Karatzoglou, and D. Tikk, “Parallel recurrent neural network architectures for feature-rich session-based recommendations,” inRecSys. ACM, 2016, pp. 241–248

    2016

  5. [10]

    Keywords generation improves e-commerce session-based recommendation,

    Y . Liu, Z. Ren, W. Zhang, W. Che, T. Liu, and D. Yin, “Keywords generation improves e-commerce session-based recommendation,” in WWW, 2020, pp. 1604–1614

    2020

  6. [11]

    Towards universal sequence representation learning for recommender systems,

    Y . Hou, S. Mu, W. X. Zhao, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Wen, “Towards universal sequence representation learning for recommender systems,” inKDD, 2022, pp. 585–593

    2022

  7. [12]

    Price DOES matter!: Modeling price and interest preferences in session- based recommendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, L. Yang, C. Li, F. Ma, H. Liu, and H. Lin, “Price DOES matter!: Modeling price and interest preferences in session- based recommendation,” inSIGIR, 2022, pp. 1684–1693

    2022

  8. [13]

    Bi-preference learning heterogeneous hypergraph networks for session-based recom- mendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, F. Ma, C. Li, Y . Lin, and H. Lin, “Bi-preference learning heterogeneous hypergraph networks for session-based recom- mendation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 3, 2023

    2023

  9. [14]

    Incorporating user micro-behaviors and item knowledge into multi-task learning for session-based recom- mendation,

    W. Meng, D. Yang, and Y . Xiao, “Incorporating user micro-behaviors and item knowledge into multi-task learning for session-based recom- mendation,” inSIGIR, 2020, pp. 1091–1100

    2020

  10. [15]

    Micro-behavior encoding for session-based recommendation,

    J. Yuan, W. Ji, D. Zhang, J. Pan, and X. Wang, “Micro-behavior encoding for session-based recommendation,” inICDE, 2022, pp. 2886–2899

    2022

  11. [16]

    Se- quential recommender systems: Challenges, progress and prospects,

    S. Wang, L. Hu, Y . Wang, L. Cao, Q. Z. Sheng, and M. A. Orgun, “Se- quential recommender systems: Challenges, progress and prospects,” in IJCAI. ijcai.org, 2019, pp. 6332–6338

    2019

  12. [17]

    Deep learning for sequen- tial recommendation: Algorithms, influential factors, and evaluations,

    H. Fang, D. Zhang, Y . Shu, and G. Guo, “Deep learning for sequen- tial recommendation: Algorithms, influential factors, and evaluations,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10:1–10:42, 2020

    2020

  13. [18]

    Multimodal recommender systems: A survey,

    Q. Liu, J. Hu, Y . Xiao, X. Zhao, J. Gao, W. Wang, Q. Li, and J. Tang, “Multimodal recommender systems: A survey,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 26:1–26:17, 2025

    2025

  14. [19]

    Research commentary on recommendations with side information: A survey and research directions,

    Z. Sun, Q. Guo, J. Yang, H. Fang, G. Guo, J. Zhang, and R. Burke, “Research commentary on recommendations with side information: A survey and research directions,”Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 37, 2019

    2019

  15. [20]

    Empirical analysis of session-based recommendation algorithms,

    M. Ludewig, N. Mauro, S. Latifi, and D. Jannach, “Empirical analysis of session-based recommendation algorithms,”UMUAI, pp. 1–33, 2020

    2020

  16. [21]

    Graph and sequential neural networks in session-based recommendation: A survey,

    Z. Li, C. Yang, Y . Chen, X. Wang, H. Chen, G. Xu, L. Yao, and M. Sheng, “Graph and sequential neural networks in session-based recommendation: A survey,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 40:1–40:37, 2025

    2025

  17. [22]

    Im- proving session recommendation with recurrent neural networks by exploiting dwell time,

    A. Dallmann, A. Grimm, C. P ¨olitz, D. Zoller, and A. Hotho, “Im- proving session recommendation with recurrent neural networks by exploiting dwell time,”CoRR, vol. abs/1706.10231, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Dynamic intent-aware iterative denoising network for session-based recommen- dation,

    X. Zhang, H. Lin, B. Xu, C. Li, Y . Lin, H. Liu, and F. Ma, “Dynamic intent-aware iterative denoising network for session-based recommen- dation,”Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 59, p. 102936, 2022

    2022

  19. [24]

    Dual part-pooling attentive networks for session-based recommendation,

    X. Zhang, H. Lin, L. Yang, B. Xu, Y . Diao, and L. Ren, “Dual part-pooling attentive networks for session-based recommendation,” Neurocomputing, vol. 440, pp. 89–100, 2021

    2021

  20. [25]

    Time-sensitive col- laborative interest aware model for session-based recommendation,

    Y . Lv, L. Zhuang, P. Luo, H. Li, and Z. Zha, “Time-sensitive col- laborative interest aware model for session-based recommendation,” in ICME, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  21. [26]

    Category-aware collaborative sequential recommendation,

    R. Cai, J. Wu, A. San, C. Wang, and H. Wang, “Category-aware collaborative sequential recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2021, pp. 388–397

    2021

  22. [27]

    Sequential recommendation with decomposed item feature routing,

    K. Lin, Z. Wang, S. Shen, Z. Wang, B. Chen, and X. Chen, “Sequential recommendation with decomposed item feature routing,” inWWW, 2022, pp. 2288–2297

    2022

  23. [28]

    Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations,

    B. Hidasi and A. Karatzoglou, “Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations,” inCIKM, 2018, pp. 843– 852

    2018

  24. [29]

    Attention- based transactional context embedding for next-item recommendation,

    S. Wang, L. Hu, L. Cao, X. Huang, D. Lian, and W. Liu, “Attention- based transactional context embedding for next-item recommendation,” inAAAI, 2018, pp. 2532–2539

    2018

  25. [32]

    Session-based recommendation with graph neural networks,

    S. Wu, Y . Tang, Y . Zhu, L. Wang, X. Xie, and T. Tan, “Session-based recommendation with graph neural networks,” inAAAI, 2019, pp. 346– 353

    2019

  26. [33]

    A review-driven neural model for sequential recommendation,

    C. Li, X. Niu, X. Luo, Z. Chen, and C. Quan, “A review-driven neural model for sequential recommendation,” inIJCAI, 2019, pp. 2866–2872

    2019

  27. [34]

    Global context enhanced graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,

    Z. Wang, W. Wei, G. Cong, X. Li, X. Mao, and M. Qiu, “Global context enhanced graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,” inSIGIR, 2020, pp. 169–178

    2020

  28. [35]

    Star graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,

    Z. Pan, F. Cai, W. Chen, H. Chen, and M. de Rijke, “Star graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,” inCIKM, 2020, pp. 1195–1204

    2020

  29. [36]

    Future data helps training: Modeling future contexts for session-based recommendation,

    F. Yuan, X. He, H. Jiang, G. Guo, J. Xiong, Z. Xu, and Y . Xiong, “Future data helps training: Modeling future contexts for session-based recommendation,” inWWW, 2020, pp. 303–313

    2020

  30. [37]

    Gsl4rec: Session-based recom- mendations with collective graph structure learning and next interaction prediction,

    C. Wei, B. Bai, K. Bai, and F. Wang, “Gsl4rec: Session-based recom- mendations with collective graph structure learning and next interaction prediction,” inWWW. ACM, 2022, pp. 2120–2130

    2022

  31. [38]

    On the effectiveness of unlearning in session-based recommendation,

    X. Xin, L. Yang, Z. Zhao, P. Ren, Z. Chen, J. Ma, and Z. Ren, “On the effectiveness of unlearning in session-based recommendation,” in WSDM. ACM, 2024, pp. 855–863

    2024

  32. [39]

    Modeling user fatigue for sequential recommendation,

    N. Li, X. Ban, C. Ling, C. Gao, L. Hu, P. Jiang, K. Gai, Y . Li, and Q. Liao, “Modeling user fatigue for sequential recommendation,” in SIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 996–1005

    2024

  33. [40]

    Finerec: Exploring fine-grained sequential recommendation,

    X. Zhang, B. Xu, Y . Wu, Y . Zhong, H. Lin, and F. Ma, “Finerec: Exploring fine-grained sequential recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 1599–1608

    2024

  34. [41]

    Dual contrastive learning for efficient static feature representation in sequential recommendations,

    P. Li, M. Que, and A. Tuzhilin, “Dual contrastive learning for efficient static feature representation in sequential recommendations,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 544–555, 2024

    2024

  35. [42]

    Dual-view whitening on pre-trained text embeddings for sequential recommendation,

    L. Zhang, X. Zhou, Z. Zeng, and Z. Shen, “Dual-view whitening on pre-trained text embeddings for sequential recommendation,” inAAAI. AAAI Press, 2024, pp. 9332–9340

    2024

  36. [43]

    Multi-intent-aware session- based recommendation,

    M. Choi, H. Kim, H. Cho, and J. Lee, “Multi-intent-aware session- based recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 2532–2536

    2024

  37. [44]

    Session-based recommen- dation with hypergraph attention networks,

    J. Wang, K. Ding, Z. Zhu, and J. Caverlee, “Session-based recommen- dation with hypergraph attention networks,” inSDM, 2021, pp. 82–90

    2021

  38. [45]

    Contrastive learning for sequential recommendation,

    X. Xie, F. Sun, Z. Liu, S. Wu, J. Gao, J. Zhang, B. Ding, and B. Cui, “Contrastive learning for sequential recommendation,” in38th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2022, pp. 1259–1273

    2022

  39. [46]

    Diffurec: A diffusion model for sequential recommendation,

    Z. Li, A. Sun, and C. Li, “Diffurec: A diffusion model for sequential recommendation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 66:1–66:28, 2024

    2024

  40. [47]

    A self-correcting sequential recommender,

    Y . Lin, C. Wang, Z. Chen, Z. Ren, X. Xin, Q. Yan, M. de Rijke, X. Cheng, and P. Ren, “A self-correcting sequential recommender,” in WWW. ACM, 2023, pp. 1283–1293

    2023

  41. [48]

    Graph-enhanced multi-task learning of multi-level transition dynamics for session-based recommendation,

    C. Huang, J. Chen, L. Xia, Y . Xu, P. Dai, Y . Chen, L. Bo, J. Zhao, and J. X. Huang, “Graph-enhanced multi-task learning of multi-level transition dynamics for session-based recommendation,” inAAAI, 2021, pp. 4123–4130

    2021

  42. [49]

    A dynamic co-attention network for session-based recommendation,

    W. Chen, F. Cai, H. Chen, and M. de Rijke, “A dynamic co-attention network for session-based recommendation,” inCIKM, 2019, pp. 1461– 1470

    2019

  43. [50]

    Graph contextualized self-attention network for session- based recommendation,

    C. Xu, P. Zhao, Y . Liu, V . S. Sheng, J. Xu, F. Zhuang, J. Fang, and X. Zhou, “Graph contextualized self-attention network for session- based recommendation,” inIJCAI, 2019, pp. 3940–3946

    2019

  44. [51]

    Multi-modal mixture of experts represetation learning for sequential recommendation,

    S. Bian, X. Pan, W. X. Zhao, J. Wang, C. Wang, and J. Wen, “Multi-modal mixture of experts represetation learning for sequential recommendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2023, pp. 110–119. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING 18

    2023

  45. [52]

    A generic reinforced explainable framework with knowledge graph for session- based recommendation,

    H. Wu, H. Fang, Z. Sun, C. Geng, X. Kong, and Y . Ong, “A generic reinforced explainable framework with knowledge graph for session- based recommendation,” inICDE. IEEE, 2023, pp. 1260–1272

    2023

  46. [53]

    Knowledge-enhanced multi-view graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,

    Q. Chen, Z. Guo, J. Li, and G. Li, “Knowledge-enhanced multi-view graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2023, pp. 352–361

    2023

  47. [54]

    Attribute-enhanced dual channel representation learning for session-based recommendation,

    Q. Chen, J. Li, Z. Guo, G. Li, and Z. Deng, “Attribute-enhanced dual channel representation learning for session-based recommendation,” in CIKM. ACM, 2023, pp. 3793–3797

    2023

  48. [55]

    CBML: A cluster-based meta-learning model for session-based recommendation,

    J. Song, J. Xu, R. Zhou, L. Chen, J. Li, and C. Liu, “CBML: A cluster-based meta-learning model for session-based recommendation,” inCIKM, 2021, pp. 1713–1722

    2021

  49. [56]

    An attribute- driven mirror graph network for session-based recommendation,

    S. Lai, E. Meng, F. Zhang, C. Li, B. Wang, and A. Sun, “An attribute- driven mirror graph network for session-based recommendation,” in SIGIR, 2022, pp. 1674–1683

    2022

  50. [57]

    Enhancing user intent capture in session-based recommendation with attribute patterns,

    X. Liu, Z. Li, Y . Gao, J. Yang, T. Cao, Z. Wang, B. Yin, and Y . Song, “Enhancing user intent capture in session-based recommendation with attribute patterns,” inNeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  51. [58]

    Personalized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding,

    J. Tang and K. Wang, “Personalized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding,” inWSDM, 2018, pp. 565–573

    2018

  52. [59]

    Geography-aware sequential location recommendation,

    D. Lian, Y . Wu, Y . Ge, X. Xie, and E. Chen, “Geography-aware sequential location recommendation,” inKDD. ACM, 2020, pp. 2009– 2019

    2020

  53. [60]

    Spatial-temporal interval aware sequential POI recommendation,

    E. Wang, Y . Jiang, Y . Xu, L. Wang, and Y . Yang, “Spatial-temporal interval aware sequential POI recommendation,” inICDE. IEEE, 2022, pp. 2086–2098

    2022

  54. [61]

    Disenpoi: Disentangling sequential and geographical influence for point-of-interest recommendation,

    Y . Qin, Y . Wang, F. Sun, W. Ju, X. Hou, Z. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Lei, and M. Zhang, “Disenpoi: Disentangling sequential and geographical influence for point-of-interest recommendation,” inWSDM. ACM, 2023, pp. 508–516

    2023

  55. [62]

    Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains,

    M. Wan and J. J. McAuley, “Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains,” inRecSys. ACM, 2018, pp. 86–94

    2018

  56. [63]

    Enhancing sequential recommendation with graph contrastive learn- ing,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Liu, Y . Xu, H. Xiong, C. Lei, W. He, L. Cui, and C. Miao, “Enhancing sequential recommendation with graph contrastive learn- ing,” inIJCAI. ijcai.org, 2022, pp. 2398–2405

    2022

  57. [64]

    Memory augmented graph neural networks for sequential recommendation,

    C. Ma, L. Ma, Y . Zhang, J. Sun, X. Liu, and M. Coates, “Memory augmented graph neural networks for sequential recommendation,” in AAAI. AAAI Press, 2020, pp. 5045–5052

    2020

  58. [65]

    Hyperbolic hypergraphs for sequential recommendation,

    Y . Li, H. Chen, X. Sun, Z. Sun, L. Li, L. Cui, P. S. Yu, and G. Xu, “Hyperbolic hypergraphs for sequential recommendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2021, pp. 988–997

    2021

  59. [66]

    The world is binary: Contrastive learning for denoising next basket recommendation,

    Y . Qin, P. Wang, and C. Li, “The world is binary: Contrastive learning for denoising next basket recommendation,” inSIGIR, 2021, pp. 859– 868

    2021

  60. [67]

    Taxonomy-aware multi-hop reasoning networks for sequential recom- mendation,

    J. Huang, Z. Ren, W. X. Zhao, G. He, J. Wen, and D. Dong, “Taxonomy-aware multi-hop reasoning networks for sequential recom- mendation,” inWSDM. ACM, 2019, pp. 573–581

    2019

  61. [69]

    Im- proving sequential recommendation with knowledge-enhanced memory networks,

    J. Huang, W. X. Zhao, H. Dou, J. Wen, and E. Y . Chang, “Im- proving sequential recommendation with knowledge-enhanced memory networks,” inSIGIR, 2018, pp. 505–514

    2018

  62. [70]

    KERL: A knowledge-guided reinforcement learning model for sequential rec- ommendation,

    P. Wang, Y . Fan, L. Xia, W. X. Zhao, S. Niu, and J. X. Huang, “KERL: A knowledge-guided reinforcement learning model for sequential rec- ommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2020, pp. 209–218

    2020

  63. [71]

    Time matters: Sequential recommendation with complex temporal information,

    W. Ye, S. Wang, X. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Qin, and D. Yin, “Time matters: Sequential recommendation with complex temporal information,” in SIGIR, 2020, pp. 3940–3946

    2020

  64. [72]

    Noninvasive self-attention for side information fusion in sequential recommenda- tion,

    C. Liu, X. Li, G. Cai, Z. Dong, H. Zhu, and L. Shang, “Noninvasive self-attention for side information fusion in sequential recommenda- tion,” inAAAI, 2021, pp. 4249–4256

    2021

  65. [73]

    Knowledge graph-based behavior de- noising and preference learning for sequential recommendation,

    H. Liu, Y . Zhu, and Z. Wu, “Knowledge graph-based behavior de- noising and preference learning for sequential recommendation,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2490–2503, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Learning dual-view user representations for enhanced sequential recommendation,

    L. Xue, D. Yang, S. Zhai, Y . Li, and Y . Xiao, “Learning dual-view user representations for enhanced sequential recommendation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 86:1–86:26, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    IISAN: efficiently adapting multimodal representation for sequential recommendation with decoupled PEFT,

    J. Fu, X. Ge, X. Xin, A. Karatzoglou, I. Arapakis, J. Wang, and J. M. Jose, “IISAN: efficiently adapting multimodal representation for sequential recommendation with decoupled PEFT,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 687–697

    2024

  68. [76]

    Multi- modality is all you need for transferable recommender systems,

    Y . Li, H. Du, Y . Ni, P. Zhao, Q. Guo, F. Yuan, and X. Zhou, “Multi- modality is all you need for transferable recommender systems,” in ICDE. IEEE, 2024, pp. 5008–5021

    2024

  69. [77]

    Sequence and time aware neighborhood for session-based recommendations: STAN,

    D. Garg, P. Gupta, P. Malhotra, L. Vig, and G. M. Shroff, “Sequence and time aware neighborhood for session-based recommendations: STAN,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2019, pp. 1069–1072

    2019

  70. [78]

    Niser: Normalized item and session representations to handle popularity bias,

    P. Gupta, D. Garg, P. Malhotra, L. Vig, and G. Shroff, “Niser: Normalized item and session representations to handle popularity bias,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04276, 2019

    1909 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Multi-behavior hypergraph-enhanced transformer for sequential recommendation,

    Y . Yang, C. Huang, L. Xia, Y . Liang, Y . Yu, and C. Li, “Multi-behavior hypergraph-enhanced transformer for sequential recommendation,” in KDD. ACM, 2022, pp. 2263–2274

    2022

  72. [80]

    Time interval aware self-attention for sequential recommendation,

    J. Li, Y . Wang, and J. J. McAuley, “Time interval aware self-attention for sequential recommendation,” inWSDM. ACM, 2020, pp. 322–330

    2020

  73. [81]

    Cold-start sequential recommen- dation via meta learner,

    Y . Zheng, S. Liu, Z. Li, and S. Wu, “Cold-start sequential recommen- dation via meta learner,” inAAAI. AAAI Press, 2021, pp. 4706–4713

    2021

  74. [82]

    Exploiting session information in bert- based session-aware sequential recommendation,

    J. J. Seol, Y . Ko, and S. Lee, “Exploiting session information in bert- based session-aware sequential recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2022, pp. 2639–2644

    2022

  75. [83]

    Adaptive disentangled transformer for sequential recommendation,

    Y . Zhang, X. Wang, H. Chen, and W. Zhu, “Adaptive disentangled transformer for sequential recommendation,” inKDD. ACM, 2023, pp. 3434–3445

    2023

  76. [84]

    Joint optimization of tree-based index and deep model for recommender systems,

    H. Zhu, D. Chang, Z. Xu, P. Zhang, X. Li, J. He, H. Li, J. Xu, and K. Gai, “Joint optimization of tree-based index and deep model for recommender systems,” inNeurIPS, 2019, pp. 3973–3982

    2019

  77. [85]

    Efficient noise-decoupling for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,

    Y . Han, H. Wang, K. Wang, L. Wu, Z. Li, W. Guo, Y . Liu, D. Lian, and E. Chen, “Efficient noise-decoupling for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 3297–3306

    2024

  78. [86]

    In- corporating link prediction into multi-relational item graph modeling for session-based recommendation,

    W. Wang, W. Zhang, S. Liu, Q. Liu, B. Zhang, L. Lin, and H. Zha, “In- corporating link prediction into multi-relational item graph modeling for session-based recommendation,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 2683–2696, 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Multi-behavior sequential transformer recommender,

    E. Yuan, W. Guo, Z. He, H. Guo, C. Liu, and R. Tang, “Multi-behavior sequential transformer recommender,” inSIGIR, 2022, pp. 1642–1652

    2022

  80. [88]

    CORE: simple and effective session-based recommendation within consistent representation space,

    Y . Hou, B. Hu, Z. Zhang, and W. X. Zhao, “CORE: simple and effective session-based recommendation within consistent representation space,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2022, pp. 1796–1801

    2022

  81. [89]

    Multi-faceted global item relation learning for session-based recommendation,

    Q. Han, C. Zhang, R. Chen, R. Lai, H. Song, and L. Li, “Multi-faceted global item relation learning for session-based recommendation,” in SIGIR, 2022, pp. 1705–1715

    2022

  82. [90]

    Filter-enhanced MLP is all you need for sequential recommendation,

    K. Zhou, H. Yu, W. X. Zhao, and J. Wen, “Filter-enhanced MLP is all you need for sequential recommendation,” inWWW, 2022, pp. 2388– 2399

    2022

  83. [91]

    Bi-channel multiple sparse graph attention networks for session-based recommendation,

    S. Qiao, W. Zhou, J. Wen, H. Zhang, and M. Gao, “Bi-channel multiple sparse graph attention networks for session-based recommendation,” in CIKM. ACM, 2023, pp. 2075–2084

    2023

  84. [92]

    D ´ej`a vu: A contextualized temporal attention mechanism for sequential recommendation,

    J. Wu, R. Cai, and H. Wang, “D ´ej`a vu: A contextualized temporal attention mechanism for sequential recommendation,” inWWW, 2020, pp. 2199–2209

    2020

  85. [93]

    Fair-srs: A fair session- based recommendation system,

    N. R. Kermany, J. Yang, J. Wu, and L. Pizzato, “Fair-srs: A fair session- based recommendation system,” inWSDM. ACM, 2022, pp. 1601– 1604

    2022

  86. [94]

    Heterogeneous global graph neural networks for personalized session-based recommendation,

    Y . Pang, L. Wu, Q. Shen, Y . Zhang, Z. Wei, F. Xu, E. Chang, B. Long, and J. Pei, “Heterogeneous global graph neural networks for personalized session-based recommendation,” inWSDM, 2022, pp. 775–783

    2022

  87. [95]

    Personalized graph neural networks with attention mechanism for session-aware recommendation,

    M. Zhang, S. Wu, M. Gao, X. Jiang, K. Xu, and L. Wang, “Personalized graph neural networks with attention mechanism for session-aware recommendation,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 3946–3957, 2022

    2022

  88. [96]

    Temporal contrastive pre-training for sequential recommendation,

    C. Tian, Z. Lin, S. Bian, J. Wang, and W. X. Zhao, “Temporal contrastive pre-training for sequential recommendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2022, pp. 1925–1934

    2022

  89. [97]

    Text matching improves sequential recommendation by reducing popularity biases,

    Z. Liu, S. Mei, C. Xiong, X. Li, S. Yu, Z. Liu, Y . Gu, and G. Yu, “Text matching improves sequential recommendation by reducing popularity biases,” inCIKM, 2023, pp. 1534–1544

    2023

  90. [98]

    To copy, or not to copy; that is a critical issue of the output softmax layer in neural sequential recommenders,

    H. Chang, N. Agarwal, and A. McCallum, “To copy, or not to copy; that is a critical issue of the output softmax layer in neural sequential recommenders,” inWSDM. ACM, 2024, pp. 67–76

    2024

  91. [99]

    Repeatnet: A repeat aware neural recommendation machine for session-based recommendation,

    P. Ren, Z. Chen, J. Li, Z. Ren, J. Ma, and M. de Rijke, “Repeatnet: A repeat aware neural recommendation machine for session-based recommendation,” inAAAI, 2019, pp. 4806–4813

    2019

  92. [100]

    S-walk: Accurate and scalable session-based recommendation with random walks,

    M. Choi, J. Kim, J. Lee, H. Shim, and J. Lee, “S-walk: Accurate and scalable session-based recommendation with random walks,” in WSDM, 2022, pp. 150–160

    2022

  93. [101]

    Autogsr: Neural architecture search for graph-based session recommendation,

    J. Chen, G. Zhu, H. Hou, C. Yuan, and Y . Huang, “Autogsr: Neural architecture search for graph-based session recommendation,” inSIGIR, 2022, pp. 1694–1704. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING 19

    2022

  94. [102]

    A generic learning framework for sequential recommendation with distribution shifts,

    Z. Yang, X. He, J. Zhang, J. Wu, X. Xin, J. Chen, and X. Wang, “A generic learning framework for sequential recommendation with distribution shifts,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2023, pp. 331–340

    2023

  95. [103]

    Coarse-to-fine sparse sequential recommendation,

    J. Li, T. Zhao, J. Li, J. Chan, C. Faloutsos, G. Karypis, S. Pantel, and J. J. McAuley, “Coarse-to-fine sparse sequential recommendation,” in SIGIR. ACM, 2022, pp. 2082–2086

    2022

  96. [104]

    Context and attribute- aware sequential recommendation via cross-attention,

    A. Rashed, S. Elsayed, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, “Context and attribute- aware sequential recommendation via cross-attention,” inRecSys, 2022, pp. 71–80

    2022

  97. [105]

    Learning global and multi-granularity local representation with MLP for sequential recommendation,

    C. Long, H. Yuan, J. Fang, X. Xian, G. Liu, V . S. Sheng, and P. Zhao, “Learning global and multi-granularity local representation with MLP for sequential recommendation,”ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 87:1–87:15, 2024

    2024

  98. [106]

    Cheaper is better: Exploring price competitiveness for online purchase prediction,

    H. Wu, H. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Chen, F. Zhu, and X. Fang, “Cheaper is better: Exploring price competitiveness for online purchase prediction,” in38th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE, 2022, pp. 3399–3412

    2022

  99. [107]

    Price-aware recommenda- tion with graph convolutional networks,

    Y . Zheng, C. Gao, X. He, Y . Li, and D. Jin, “Price-aware recommenda- tion with graph convolutional networks,” inICDE, 2020, pp. 133–144

    2020

  100. [108]

    Modeling consumer preferences and price sensitivities from large-scale grocery shopping transaction logs,

    M. Wan, D. Wang, M. Goldman, M. Taddy, J. Rao, J. Liu, D. Lym- beropoulos, and J. J. McAuley, “Modeling consumer preferences and price sensitivities from large-scale grocery shopping transaction logs,” inWWW, 2017, pp. 1103–1112

    2017

  101. [109]

    LLMRG: improving recommendations through large language model reasoning graphs,

    Y . Wang, Z. Chu, X. Ouyang, S. Wang, H. Hao, Y . Shen, J. Gu, S. Xue, J. Zhang, Q. Cui, L. Li, J. Zhou, and S. Li, “LLMRG: improving recommendations through large language model reasoning graphs,” in AAAI. AAAI Press, 2024, pp. 19 189–19 196

    2024

  102. [110]

    Data- efficient fine-tuning for llm-based recommendation,

    X. Lin, W. Wang, Y . Li, S. Yang, F. Feng, Y . Wei, and T. Chua, “Data- efficient fine-tuning for llm-based recommendation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 365–374

    2024

  103. [111]

    Let me do it for you: Towards LLM empowered recommendation via tool learning,

    Y . Zhao, J. Wu, X. Wang, W. Tang, D. Wang, and M. de Rijke, “Let me do it for you: Towards LLM empowered recommendation via tool learning,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 1796–1806

    2024

  104. [112]

    Adaptive multi-modalities fusion in sequential recommendation systems,

    H. Hu, W. Guo, Y . Liu, and M. Kan, “Adaptive multi-modalities fusion in sequential recommendation systems,” inCIKM. ACM, 2023, pp. 843–853

    2023

  105. [113]

    Bootstrap latent representations for multi-modal recommen- dation,

    X. Zhou, H. Zhou, Y . Liu, Z. Zeng, C. Miao, P. Wang, Y . You, and F. Jiang, “Bootstrap latent representations for multi-modal recommen- dation,” inWWW. ACM, 2023, pp. 845–854

    2023

  106. [114]

    Graph-refined convolutional network for multimedia recommendation with implicit feedback,

    Y . Wei, X. Wang, L. Nie, X. He, and T. Chua, “Graph-refined convolutional network for multimedia recommendation with implicit feedback,” inMM, 2020, pp. 3541–3549

    2020

  107. [115]

    VIP5: towards multimodal foundation models for recommendation,

    S. Geng, J. Tan, S. Liu, Z. Fu, and Y . Zhang, “VIP5: towards multimodal foundation models for recommendation,” inFindings of EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023, pp. 9606– 9620

    2023

  108. [116]

    MEGCF: multimodal entity graph collaborative filtering for personalized rec- ommendation,

    K. Liu, F. Xue, D. Guo, L. Wu, S. Li, and R. Hong, “MEGCF: multimodal entity graph collaborative filtering for personalized rec- ommendation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 30:1–30:27, 2023

    2023

  109. [117]

    Point-of-interest recom- mendation: Exploiting self-attentive autoencoders with neighbor-aware influence,

    C. Ma, Y . Zhang, Q. Wang, and X. Liu, “Point-of-interest recom- mendation: Exploiting self-attentive autoencoders with neighbor-aware influence,” inCIKM. ACM, 2018, pp. 697–706

    2018

  110. [118]

    Context-aware review helpfulness rating prediction,

    J. Tang, H. Gao, X. Hu, and H. Liu, “Context-aware review helpfulness rating prediction,” inRecSys. ACM, 2013, pp. 1–8

    2013

  111. [119]

    Bayesian probabilistic multi-topic matrix factorization for rating prediction,

    K. Wang, W. X. Zhao, H. Peng, and X. Wang, “Bayesian probabilistic multi-topic matrix factorization for rating prediction,” inIJCAI. IJ- CAI/AAAI Press, 2016, pp. 3910–3916

    2016

  112. [120]

    Global heterogeneous graph and target interest denoising for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,

    X. Li, H. Chen, J. Yu, M. Zhao, T. Xu, W. Zhang, and M. Yu, “Global heterogeneous graph and target interest denoising for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,” inWSDM. ACM, 2024, pp. 387–395

    2024

  113. [121]

    Behavior- contextualized item preference modeling for multi-behavior recommen- dation,

    M. Yan, F. Liu, J. Sun, F. Sun, Z. Cheng, and Y . Han, “Behavior- contextualized item preference modeling for multi-behavior recommen- dation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 946–955

    2024

  114. [122]

    Multi-behavior hypergraph contrastive learning for session-based recommendation,

    L. Guo, S. Zhou, H. Tang, X. Zheng, and Y . Luo, “Multi-behavior hypergraph contrastive learning for session-based recommendation,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1325–1338, 2025

    2025

  115. [123]

    Distribution-based learnable filters with side information for sequential recommendation,

    H. Liu, Z. Deng, L. Wang, J. Peng, and S. Feng, “Distribution-based learnable filters with side information for sequential recommendation,” inRecSys. ACM, 2023, pp. 78–88

    2023

  116. [124]

    Multi-modal knowledge graphs for recommender systems,

    R. Sun, X. Cao, Y . Zhao, J. Wan, K. Zhou, F. Zhang, Z. Wang, and K. Zheng, “Multi-modal knowledge graphs for recommender systems,” inCIKM. ACM, 2020, pp. 1405–1414

    2020

  117. [125]

    Multi-view enhanced graph attention network for session-based music recommen- dation,

    D. Wang, X. Zhang, Y . Yin, D. Yu, G. Xu, and S. Deng, “Multi-view enhanced graph attention network for session-based music recommen- dation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 16:1–16:30, 2024

    2024

  118. [126]

    Glove: Global vectors for word representation,

    J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning, “Glove: Global vectors for word representation,” inEMNLP, 2014, pp. 1532–1543

    2014

  119. [127]

    BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171–4186

    2019

  120. [128]

    Going deeper with convolutions,

    C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y . Jia, P. Sermanet, S. E. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V . Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich, “Going deeper with convolutions,” inCVPR, 2015, pp. 1–9

    2015

  121. [129]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” inICLR, 2021

    2021

  122. [130]

    Rethinking the item order in session-based recommendation with graph neural networks,

    R. Qiu, J. Li, Z. Huang, and H. Yin, “Rethinking the item order in session-based recommendation with graph neural networks,” inCIKM. ACM, 2019, pp. 579–588

    2019

  123. [131]

    M2trec: Metadata-aware multi-task transformer for large-scale and cold-start free session-based recommendations,

    W. Shalaby, S. Oh, A. Afsharinejad, S. Kumar, and X. Cui, “M2trec: Metadata-aware multi-task transformer for large-scale and cold-start free session-based recommendations,” inRecSys, 2022, pp. 573–578

    2022

  124. [132]

    Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy,

    T. Baltrusaitis, C. Ahuja, and L. Morency, “Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., pp. 423–443, 2019

    2019

  125. [133]

    Attention bottlenecks for multimodal fusion,

    A. Nagrani, S. Yang, A. Arnab, A. Jansen, C. Schmid, and C. Sun, “Attention bottlenecks for multimodal fusion,” inNeurIPS, 2021, pp. 14 200–14 213

    2021

  126. [134]

    MMMLP: multi-modal multilayer perceptron for sequential recom- mendations,

    J. Liang, X. Zhao, M. Li, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, H. Liu, and Z. Liu, “MMMLP: multi-modal multilayer perceptron for sequential recom- mendations,” inWWW, 2023, pp. 1109–1117

    2023

  127. [135]

    Feature-level deeper self-attention network for sequential recommendation,

    T. Zhang, P. Zhao, Y . Liu, V . S. Sheng, J. Xu, D. Wang, G. Liu, and X. Zhou, “Feature-level deeper self-attention network for sequential recommendation,” inIJCAI, 2019, pp. 4320–4326

    2019

  128. [136]

    Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,

    P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023

    2023

  129. [137]

    Where to go next for recommender systems? ID- vs. modality-based recommender models revisited,

    Z. Yuan, F. Yuan, Y . Song, Y . Li, J. Fu, F. Yang, Y . Pan, and Y . Ni, “Where to go next for recommender systems? ID- vs. modality-based recommender models revisited,” inSIGIR, 2023, pp. 2639–2649

    2023

  130. [138]

    BPR: bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback,

    S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, “BPR: bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback,” inUAI. AUAI Press, 2009, pp. 452–461

    2009

  131. [139]

    An mdp-based recom- mender system,

    G. Shani, D. Heckerman, and R. I. Brafman, “An mdp-based recom- mender system,”J. Mach. Learn. Res., pp. 1265–1295, 2005

    2005

  132. [140]

    Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms,

    B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl, “Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms,” inWWW. ACM, 2001, pp. 285–295

    2001

  133. [141]

    MV-RNN: A multi- view recurrent neural network for sequential recommendation,

    Q. Cui, S. Wu, Q. Liu, W. Zhong, and L. Wang, “MV-RNN: A multi- view recurrent neural network for sequential recommendation,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., pp. 317–331, 2020

    2020

  134. [142]

    Modeling multi-purpose sessions for next-item recommendations via mixture-channel purpose routing networks,

    S. Wang, L. Hu, Y . Wang, Q. Z. Sheng, M. A. Orgun, and L. Cao, “Modeling multi-purpose sessions for next-item recommendations via mixture-channel purpose routing networks,” inIJCAI, 2019, pp. 3771– 3777

    2019

  135. [143]

    3d convolutional networks for session- based recommendation with content features,

    T. X. Tuan and T. M. Phuong, “3d convolutional networks for session- based recommendation with content features,” inRecSys, 2017, pp. 138–146

    2017

  136. [144]

    A simple convolutional generative network for next item recommendation,

    F. Yuan, A. Karatzoglou, I. Arapakis, J. M. Jose, and X. He, “A simple convolutional generative network for next item recommendation,” in WSDM, 2019, pp. 582–590

    2019

  137. [145]

    Session-based recommendation with local invariance,

    T. Chen and R. C. Wong, “Session-based recommendation with local invariance,” inICDM, 2019, pp. 994–999

    2019

  138. [146]

    Exploiting positional information for session-based recommendation,

    R. Qiu, Z. Huang, T. Chen, and H. Yin, “Exploiting positional information for session-based recommendation,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 35:1–35:24, 2022

    2022

  139. [147]

    Self-supervised graph co-training for session-based recommendation,

    X. Xia, H. Yin, J. Yu, Y . Shao, and L. Cui, “Self-supervised graph co-training for session-based recommendation,” inCIKM, 2021, pp. 2180–2190

    2021

  140. [148]

    Dual contrastive trans- former for hierarchical preference modeling in sequential recommen- dation,

    C. Huang, S. Wang, X. Wang, and L. Yao, “Dual contrastive trans- former for hierarchical preference modeling in sequential recommen- dation,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2023, pp. 99–109

    2023

  141. [149]

    Multi-sequence attentive user representation learning for side- information integrated sequential recommendation,

    X. Lin, J. Luo, J. Pan, W. Pan, Z. Ming, X. Liu, S. Huang, and J. Jiang, “Multi-sequence attentive user representation learning for side- information integrated sequential recommendation,” inWSDM. ACM, 2024, pp. 414–423

    2024

  142. [150]

    Uniform sequence better: Time interval aware data augmentation for sequential recommendation,

    Y . Dang, E. Yang, G. Guo, L. Jiang, X. Wang, X. Xu, Q. Sun, and H. Liu, “Uniform sequence better: Time interval aware data augmentation for sequential recommendation,” inAAAI. AAAI Press, 2023, pp. 4225–4232. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING 20

    2023

  143. [151]

    Enhancing sequential recommendation via llm-based semantic embedding learning,

    J. Hu, W. Xia, X. Zhang, C. Fu, W. Wu, Z. Huan, A. Li, Z. Tang, and J. Zhou, “Enhancing sequential recommendation via llm-based semantic embedding learning,” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 103–111

    2024

  144. [152]

    Harnessing large language models for text-rich sequential recommendation,

    Z. Zheng, W. Chao, Z. Qiu, H. Zhu, and H. Xiong, “Harnessing large language models for text-rich sequential recommendation,” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 3207–3216

    2024

  145. [153]

    Large language models for intent-driven session recommendations,

    Z. Sun, H. Liu, X. Qu, K. Feng, Y . Wang, and Y . S. Ong, “Large language models for intent-driven session recommendations,” inSIGIR. ACM, 2024, pp. 324–334

    2024

  146. [154]

    Dynamic explainable recommendation based on neural attentive models,

    X. Chen, Y . Zhang, and Z. Qin, “Dynamic explainable recommendation based on neural attentive models,” inAAAI. AAAI Press, 2019, pp. 53–60

    2019

  147. [155]

    Multimodal meta-learning for cold-start sequential recommendation,

    X. Pan, Y . Chen, C. Tian, Z. Lin, J. Wang, H. Hu, and W. X. Zhao, “Multimodal meta-learning for cold-start sequential recommendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2022, pp. 3421–3430

    2022

  148. [156]

    Dual-task learning for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,

    J. Luo, M. He, X. Lin, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Dual-task learning for multi-behavior sequential recommendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2022, pp. 1379–1388

    2022

  149. [157]

    Global and personalized graphs for heterogeneous sequential recommendation by learning behavior transitions and user intentions,

    W. Chen, M. He, Y . Ni, W. Pan, L. Chen, and Z. Ming, “Global and personalized graphs for heterogeneous sequential recommendation by learning behavior transitions and user intentions,” inRecSys. ACM, 2022, pp. 268–277

    2022

  150. [158]

    Decoupled side information fusion for sequential recommendation,

    Y . Xie, P. Zhou, and S. Kim, “Decoupled side information fusion for sequential recommendation,” inSIGIR, 2022, pp. 1611–1621

    2022

  151. [159]

    Cascaded cross attention for review-based sequential recommendation,

    B. Huang, J. Luo, W. Du, W. Pan, and Z. Ming, “Cascaded cross attention for review-based sequential recommendation,” inICDM. IEEE, 2023, pp. 170–179

    2023

  152. [160]

    Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation,

    J. Li, M. Wang, J. Li, J. Fu, X. Shen, J. Shang, and J. J. McAuley, “Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation,” inSIGKDD. ACM, 2023, pp. 1258–1267

    2023

  153. [161]

    Knowl- edge graph-based session recommendation with session-adaptive prop- agation,

    Y . Wang, A. Javari, J. Balaji, W. Shalaby, T. Derr, and X. Cui, “Knowl- edge graph-based session recommendation with session-adaptive prop- agation,” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 264–273

    2024

  154. [162]

    Can small language models be good reasoners for sequential recommendation?

    Y . Wang, C. Tian, B. Hu, Y . Yu, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhou, L. Pang, and X. Wang, “Can small language models be good reasoners for sequential recommendation?” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 3876–3887

    2024

  155. [163]

    Handling information loss of graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,

    T. Chen and R. C. Wong, “Handling information loss of graph neural networks for session-based recommendation,” inKDD, 2020, pp. 1172– 1180

    2020

  156. [164]

    Spatiotemporal-aware session-based recommendation with graph neu- ral networks,

    Y . Li, C. Gao, X. Du, H. Wei, H. Luo, D. Jin, and Y . Li, “Spatiotemporal-aware session-based recommendation with graph neu- ral networks,” inCIKM. ACM, 2022, pp. 1209–1218

    2022

  157. [165]

    Time lag aware sequential recom- mendation,

    L. Chen, N. Yang, and P. S. Yu, “Time lag aware sequential recom- mendation,” inCIKM. ACM, 2022, pp. 212–221

    2022

  158. [166]

    Per- sonalized geographical influence modeling for POI recommendation,

    Y . Zhang, G. Liu, A. Liu, Y . Zhang, Z. Li, X. Zhang, and Q. Li, “Per- sonalized geographical influence modeling for POI recommendation,” IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 18–27, 2020

    2020

  159. [167]

    STAMP: short-term attention/memory priority model for session-based recommendation,

    Q. Liu, Y . Zeng, R. Mokhosi, and H. Zhang, “STAMP: short-term attention/memory priority model for session-based recommendation,” inKDD, 2018, pp. 1831–1839

    2018

  160. [168]

    Ninerec: A benchmark dataset suite for evaluating transferable recommendation,

    J. Zhang, Y . Cheng, Y . Ni, Y . Pan, Z. Yuan, J. Fu, Y . Li, J. Wang, and F. Yuan, “Ninerec: A benchmark dataset suite for evaluating transferable recommendation,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  161. [169]

    Enhancing job recommendation through llm-based generative adver- sarial networks,

    Y . Du, D. Luo, R. Yan, X. Wang, H. Liu, H. Zhu, Y . Song, and J. Zhang, “Enhancing job recommendation through llm-based generative adver- sarial networks,” inAAAI. AAAI Press, 2024, pp. 8363–8371

    2024

  162. [170]

    Explaining and exploring job recommendations: a user-driven approach for interacting with knowledge-based job recom- mender systems,

    F. Guti ´errez, S. Charleer, R. D. Croon, N. N. Htun, G. Goetschalckx, and K. Verbert, “Explaining and exploring job recommendations: a user-driven approach for interacting with knowledge-based job recom- mender systems,” inRecSys. ACM, 2019, pp. 60–68

    2019

  163. [171]

    Aligned side information fusion method for sequential recommendation,

    S. Wang, B. Shen, X. Min, Y . He, X. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Zhou, and L. Mo, “Aligned side information fusion method for sequential recommendation,” inWWW. ACM, 2024, pp. 112–120

    2024

  164. [172]

    MMGCN: multi-modal graph convolution network for personalized recommenda- tion of micro-video,

    Y . Wei, X. Wang, L. Nie, X. He, R. Hong, and T. Chua, “MMGCN: multi-modal graph convolution network for personalized recommenda- tion of micro-video,” inMM, 2019, pp. 1437–1445. Xiaokun Zhangis currently a postdoc research fellow in the Department of Computer Science, City Un...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.