Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Renormalized AdS gravity and holographic entanglement entropy of even-dimensional CFTs

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives a compact counterterm formula for renormalized entanglement entropy in even-dimensional holographic CFTs and shows it reproduces the type A central charge.

desk verdict Neat Kounterterm extension to even d with a correct a-anomaly match, but the load-bearing splitting is unproven and the cylinder check suggests the general formula is not established. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11447 v3 pith:ODKUEMCK submitted 2019-08-29 hep-th gr-qc

Giorgos Anastasiou , Ignacio J. Araya , Alberto Guijosa , Rodrigo Olea This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords AdS-CFTCorrespondenceHolographicEntanglementEntropyKountertermRenormalizationeven-dimensionalCFTsconformalanomalycentralchargeaEinsteingravityreplicatrick
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper adapts Kounterterm renormalization—renormalizing the AdS gravitational action with boundary terms built from extrinsic curvature rather than a case-by-case counterterm series—to entanglement entropy in even-dimensional CFTs with Einstein-gravity duals. The central result is that on the replicated, conically singular spacetime the boundary counterterm $B_d$ splits into a regular part plus a codimension-two copy of itself, $B_{d-2}$, localized at the entangling surface. Feeding that split into the replica prescription yields a compact renormalized entropy formula, Eq. (3.21): one quarter of Newton's constant times the Ryu–Takayanagi area plus a $B_{d-2}$ boundary term. Power-law divergences are cancelled, verified explicitly through next-to-leading order for spherical entangling surfaces, while the universal logarithmic part survives; for a spherical entangling surface that logarithmic coefficient equals the type A central charge $a$. This matters because $a$ is the scheme-independent quantity conjectured to decrease along renormalization-group flow, and the Kounterterm route computes it without dimension-by-dimension counterterm engineering.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the self-replicating splitting formula for the boundary counterterm: $$\int_{\partial $M^{{(\alpha)}}$}\sqrt{-h}\,$B_d^{{(\alpha)}}$ = \int_{\partial M}\sqrt{-h}\,B_d + 2\pi d(1-\$\alpha$)\int_{\partial\Sigma}\sqrt{\tilde\gamma}\,B_{d-2},$$ where $\alpha=1/n$ parametrizes the replica orbifold and the angular deficit is $2\pi(1-\alpha)$. This is the even-dimensional analogue of the standard decomposition of the Euler density on conical singularities into a regular term plus a codimension-two Euler term. It is what converts the replica derivative $-\partial_\alpha$ into the sum of the Ryu–Takayanagi area and a lower-dimensional counterterm, and it is the reason the entropy counterterm has exactly the same structure as the action counterterm in two fewer dimensions.

What would settle it

Compute the left- and right-hand sides of the splitting formula (3.13) for a boundary dimension $d=6$ replica orbifold with a non-spherical entangling surface, to next-to-next-to-leading order in the radial coordinate; any mismatch would leave a surviving power-law divergence in $S_{\rm ren}$ and would disprove Eq. (3.21) as a finite renormalized entropy. A simpler check is to evaluate $S_{\rm ren}$ for a non-spherical entangling surface in a CFT on flat spacetime and look for a residual $\rho^{-1}$ term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes the formula $$S_{\rm ren}=\frac{1}{4G_N}\left(\mathrm{Area}[\Sigma]+\frac{d}{2}c_d\int_{\partial\Sigma}$d^{{d-2}}$y\sqrt{\tilde\gamma}\,B_{d-2}\right)$$ for renormalized holographic entanglement entropy in even boundary dimension $d$, where $\Sigma$ is the minimal surface, $\tilde\gamma$ is the induced metric on its boundary, $B_{d-2}$ is the same extrinsic-curvature Kounterterm used to renormalize the Einstein–AdS action but evaluated two dimensions lower, and $c_d$ is the coefficient fixed by the method. The claim is that this $S_{\rm ren}$ equals the universal part of the entanglement entropy plus finite, scheme-dependent terms; all power-law divergences are removed by the $B_{d-2}$ term, while the logarithmic divergence is untouched. For spherical entangling surfaces in flat spacetime the logarithmic coefficient is shown to match the conformal-anomaly prediction, $S_{\rm univ}=(-1)^{d/2}2a\ln\epsilon$, which determines the type A central charge $a=\ell^{d-1}\pi^{d/2-1}/(8G_N(d/2-1)!)$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that on the replicated, conically singular spacetime the boundary counterterm splits into a regular term plus a codimension-two copy of itself in exactly the way the Euler density does; this split is proposed by analogy and is verified only for special cases, not proven for the replica orbifold in general.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equation (3.21) gives a closed-form renormalized entropy: the Ryu–Takayanagi area plus a $B_{d-2}$ term supported on the entangling surface, with no need to build counterterms case by case.
  • Because the Kounterterm cancels power-law divergences but leaves logarithmic ones, the universal part of the entropy survives renormalization; for a spherical entangling surface in flat spacetime it is $S_{\rm univ}=(-1)^{d/2}2a\ln\epsilon$.
  • Matching that logarithm against the conformal-anomaly formula yields the type A central charge $a=\ell^{d-1}\pi^{d/2-1}/(8G_N(d/2-1)!)$, reproducing standard values such as $a=N^2/4$ for $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang–Mills in $d=4$.
  • The self-replicating split makes the entropy counterterm as compact and dimension-uniform as the action counterterm, so the same construction applies for every even $d$ in Einstein-gravity duals.
  • Combined with the earlier odd-dimensional result, the method provides a unified treatment of renormalized holographic entanglement entropy across all CFT dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the splitting formula (3.13) holds for all smooth entangling surfaces, the same $S_{\rm ren}$ formula should render the entropy finite for arbitrary region shapes, not just spheres; a direct $d=6$ calculation with a non-spherical surface would test this.
  • The repeated reappearance of $B_{d-2k}$ at each codimension suggests a descent relation: renormalized quantities for CFTs with boundaries or defects may require a whole nested sequence of Kounterterms rather than a single term.
  • Applying the same decomposition to Lovelock or other higher-curvature duals would produce candidate renormalized entropies and anomaly coefficients beyond Einstein gravity, a natural next step the paper leaves open.
  • The finite, scheme-dependent constant $C$ in $S_{\rm ren}=S_{\rm univ}+C$ is left undetermined; computing it for explicit states could reveal shape-dependent information relevant to entropic versions of c-theorems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives a Kounterterm-based renormalized entanglement entropy for even-dimensional holographic CFTs dual to Einstein gravity. The main result, Eq. (3.21), expresses Sren as the sum of the Ryu-Takayanagi area term and a codimension-2 boundary term involving the Kounterterm Bd-2. The derivation relies on a proposed decomposition, Eq. (3.13), of the building blocks bpq on the replica orbifold into a regular part and a codimension-2 singular part, which yields the self-replicating property (3.19). The authors verify explicitly that the leading power-law divergence cancels for general entangling surfaces and that the next-to-leading divergence cancels for spherical entangling surfaces in flat spacetime; they then extract the type A central charge, Eq. (5.13), which agrees with the standard AdS/CFT result.

Significance. If the central decomposition (3.13) is valid, the paper provides a compact, dimension-uniform formula for renormalized holographic entanglement entropy and a direct extraction of the type A central charge with no fitted parameters. The final coefficient a in Eq. (5.13) is cross-checked against the independent relation (5.4) and matches known results, which is a genuine strength. The paper also performs a substantial amount of explicit algebra, including the variational-principle analysis in Appendix D, and it makes a useful pedagogical contribution by clarifying the compatibility of Kounterterms with Dirichlet boundary conditions. However, the significance is conditional: the main formula rests on an unproved splitting proposal, and the verification of divergence cancellation is limited to spherical entangling surfaces at next-to-leading order.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.13)] The boundary splitting formula (3.13), b^(α)_{pq} = b_{pq} + (1-α) 8π q b^{∂Σ}_{p-1,q-1}, is proposed by analogy with the FPS/Lovelock decomposition but is not proven for the squashed cone relevant to the Lewkowycz-Maldacena replica trick. The text itself states that the proposal is 'natural' and that later consistency checks 'lend credence' to it, which confirms that no derivation is supplied. This is a load-bearing step: Eq. (3.19) and therefore the main result Eq. (3.21) follow from (3.13), and the self-replicating coefficient (d/2)c_d is exactly what produces the α-derivative that defines Sren. The authors should either provide a proof of (3.13) from the distributional geometry of the squashed cone, or explicitly present the result as conditional on a conjecture and narrow the claims accordingly.
  2. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.10)-(4.25)] The verification of divergence cancellation is narrower than the stated generality of the main formula. The leading divergence is cancelled in full generality, but Sdiff = 0 is demonstrated only for spherical entangling surfaces in flat spacetime (Eq. (4.25)). The statement in Section 5 that 'in any dimension we expect it to cancel all of the power-law divergences' is an expectation, not a proof. Since Eq. (3.21) is presented as a general formula for even-dimensional CFTs, the authors need to provide general arguments or additional checks for non-spherical entangling surfaces, or restrict the claim to the spherical case.
  3. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (4.16)-(4.17)] Equation (4.16) and the definition of T2 in (4.17) indicate that the next-to-leading-order divergence does not cancel for a cylindrical entangling surface in flat spacetime. For a cylinder of radius R in flat spacetime, W^(0) = 0, while the extrinsic curvatures of the entangling surface satisfy κ̂^i_d{}_d κ̂^i_a{}^a = (d-3)^2/R^2 and κ̂^i_a{}_d κ̂^i_d{}^a = (d-3)/R^2, so T2 = (d-3)/((d-2)R^2) > 0 for d > 3. Substituted into (4.16), this gives Sdiff ≠ 0 and a surviving power-law divergence at order ρ^{-(d-4)/2}. Unless (4.16) or (4.17) is missing terms, the renormalized entropy (3.21) is not finite for cylindrical entangling surfaces, which contradicts the general claim of the paper. The authors should address this discrepancy explicitly, either by correcting the formula or by explaining why the cylindrical case is outside the intended scope.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.2] The text says 'We will see this term in Section IV' but the logarithmic term is discussed in Section 5; the cross-reference should be corrected.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.3)] The notation 'dd−2y' in Eq. (4.3) should read d^{d-2}y; the same typo appears in a few other places in Section 4.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (3.12)] The notation Rie(α) in Eq. (3.12) is used without a formal definition of how the Riemann tensor is evaluated on the boundary of the orbifold; a brief definition would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The universal a-coefficient check is external and no parameters are fitted, but the paper's central conical-splitting ansatz (3.13) is validated only by the very cancellations and anomaly coefficient that it is used to produce.

  1. other [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.13) and the paragraph following it]
    "The preceding discussion motivates a decomposition formula for the bpq boundary terms. Namely, we propose that b(α)pq = bpq + (1−α) 8πqb∂Σ p−1,q−1 ... Ultimately, it is the results to be found below, on the cancellation of divergences and the recovery of the correct a anomaly coefficient, that lend credence to this proposed decomposition."

    The splitting (3.13) is the load-bearing input of the derivation: it is assumed in order to obtain the B_d decomposition (3.19), and hence the central formula (3.21) for Sren and the even-dimensional Kounterterm SKt. The paper's stated validation of (3.13) is that it produces the cancellation of divergences and the correct a coefficient, but those checks are performed using Sren and SKt already derived from (3.13). Thus the confirmation of the central claim is partly a consequence of having assumed the splitting; no independent proof of (3.13) on the replica orbifold is supplied. The coefficients are not fitted, however, and the final a result is cross-checked against the external formula (5.4), which limits the severity of the circularity.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is: introduce the Kounterterm action (2.12), propose the conical-splitting formula (3.13) for the boundary building blocks b_pq, deduce the self-replicating decomposition (3.19), and then obtain Sren in (3.21). Every step after (3.13) is algebraic; the coefficients in (3.13) are not fitted to data, and the final a result in (5.13) is cross-checked against the external sphere-entropy relation (5.4). The circular element is narrower but real: equation (3.13) is explicitly introduced as a proposal, and the paper states that the later cancellation of divergences and recovery of a 'lend credence' to it. Those later results, however, are derived from (3.13), so the cited confirmation restates the consequences of the assumption rather than providing independent evidence for it. The paper also limits the explicit verification to spherical entangling surfaces in flat spacetime, while the general formula (3.21) is stated for arbitrary ALAdS backgrounds; that is a scope and correctness concern rather than circularity. Overall, because the central claim still involves nontrivial algebraic content and an external benchmark, the circularity score is moderate rather than severe.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the Kounterterm coefficient c_d is fixed from prior methods. The central claim rests on the proposed boundary splitting (3.13), which is the main ad hoc axiom, plus standard assumptions about the cone decomposition and the ACF condition.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math FPS decomposition of the Einstein-Hilbert action on a squashed cone, Eq. (2.28), including the codimension-2 area term.
    Proven in [36,105] for conically singular manifolds; used in Section 3.
  • ad hoc to paper Proposed boundary decomposition b(alpha)_{pq} = b_{pq} + (1-alpha) 8 pi q b^{partial Sigma}_{p-1,q-1}, Eq. (3.13), for p >= q >= 1.
    Introduced by analogy with the Lovelock density decomposition; not proven, but motivated and later partially validated by divergence cancellation.
  • domain assumption The minimal surface Sigma intersects the conformal boundary orthogonally, so the conical singularity does not affect the radial extrinsic curvature K of the spacetime boundary.
    Follows from Taylor-Woodhead [64]; used in Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic Conformal Flatness (ACF) condition: for bulk dimension D >= 6, the CFT metric g_(0) is conformally flat, ensuring the bulk Weyl tensor with boundary indices is subleading.
    Used in Appendix D and Section 2.3 to prove Dirichlet compatibility and equivalence with standard counterterms; restricts validity for D >= 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalized AdS gravity and holographic entanglement entropy of even-dimensional CFTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ODKUEMCK

@misc{pith2026190811447,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalized AdS gravity and holographic entanglement entropy of even-dimensional CFTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ODKUEMCK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11447}
}
read the original abstract

We derive a general formula for renormalized entanglement entropy in even dimensional CFTs holographically dual to Einstein gravity in one dimension higher. In order to renormalize, we adapt the Kounterterm method to asymptotically locally AdS manifolds with conical singularities. On the gravity side, the computation considers extrinsic counterterms and the use of the replica trick a la Lewkowycz-Maldacena. The boundary counterterm B_d is shown to satisfy a key property, in direct analogy to the Euler density: when evaluated on a conically singular manifold, it decomposes into a regular part plus a codimension-2 version of itself located at the conical singularity. The renormalized entropy thus obtained is shown to correspond to the universal part of the holographic entanglement entropy, which for spherical entangling surfaces is proportional to the central charge a that is the subject of the a-theorem. We also review and elucidate various aspects of the Kounterterm approach, including in particular its full compatibility with the Dirichlet condition for the metric at the conformal boundary, that is of standard use in holography.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Renormalized pseudoentropy in dS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Renormalized holographic pseudoentropy in dS/CFT is constructed from conformal-gravity actions in four and six dimensions, yielding finite sphere values and Mezei-like shape dependence for small deformations.

  2. On the Underlying Nonrelativistic Nature of Relativistic Holography

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Standard AdS/CFT duality is reinterpreted as D-brane/black-brane duality in nonrelativistic D3-brane theory, with AdS5×S5 as a relativistic bubble in flat 3-Newton-Cartan geometry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [95]

    Anastasiou, I

    G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya and R. Olea, Topological terms, AdS2n gravity and renormalized Entanglement Entropy of holographic CFTs , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 106015, [ 1803.04990]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [1]

    M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, M. B. Hastings and J. I. Cirac, Area Laws in Quantum Systems: Mutual Information and Correlations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 070502, [ 0704.3906]. – 52 –

    arXiv 2008

  3. [2]

    Osterloh, L

    A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci and R. Fazio, Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition, Nature 416 (2002) 608, [ quant-ph/0202029]

    arXiv 2002

  4. [3]

    T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition , Phys. Rev. A66 (2002) 032110, [ quant-ph/0202162]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [4]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 227902, [ quant-ph/0211074]

    arXiv 2003

  6. [5]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 110404, [hep-th/0510092]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [6]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 110405, [ cond-mat/0510613]

    arXiv 2006

  8. [7]

    I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan, Entanglement as a probe of confinement , Nucl. Phys. B796 (2008) 274–293, [ 0709.2140]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 117 references
  1. [8]

    Huijse, S

    L. Huijse, S. Sachdev and B. Swingle, Hidden Fermi surfaces in compressible states of gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. B85 (2012) 035121, [ 1112.0573]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, A Finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem , Phys. Lett. B600 (2004) 142–150, [ hep-th/0405111]

    2004 arXiv

  3. [10]

    R. C. Myers and A. Sinha, Seeing a c-theorem with holography , Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 046006, [1006.1263]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    R. C. Myers and A. Sinha, Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions , JHEP 01 (2011) 125, [ 1011.5819]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [12]

    D. L. Jafferis, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and B. R. Safdi, Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere , JHEP 06 (2011) 102, [ 1103.1181]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [13]

    I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and B. R. Safdi, F-Theorem without Supersymmetry, JHEP 10 (2011) 038, [ 1105.4598]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle , Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 125016, [ 1202.5650]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Test and G. Torroba, Markov Property of the Conformal Field Theory Vacuum and the a Theorem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 261602, [ 1704.01870]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [16]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, [ hep-th/9711200]

    1999 arXiv

  10. [17]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, [ hep-th/9802109]

    1998 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, [ hep-th/0603001]

    2006 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062, [ 0705.0016]. – 53 –

    2007 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Swingle, Entanglement Renormalization and Holography , Phys

    B. Swingle, Entanglement Renormalization and Holography , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 065007, [0905.1317]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement , Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement , Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323–2329, [ 1005.3035]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes , Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781–811, [ 1306.0533]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Nishioka, S

    T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview , J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504008, [ 0905.0932]

    2009 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group , 1801.10352

    T. Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group , 1801.10352

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Lectures on Gravity and Entanglement , in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings (TASI 2015): Boulder, CO, USA, June 1-26, 2015 , pp. 297–351, 2017, 1609.00026, DOI

    2015 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Lect. Notes Phys. 931 (2017) pp.1–246, [ 1609.01287]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT , PoS TASI2017 (2018) 002, [ 1802.01040]

    D. Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT , PoS TASI2017 (2018) 002, [ 1802.01040]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Bombelli, R

    L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee and R. D. Sorkin, A Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 373–383

    1986

  24. [31]

    Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 666–669, [ hep-th/9303048]

    1993 arXiv

  25. [32]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and F. Wilczek, On geometric entropy, Phys. Lett. B333 (1994) 55–61, [hep-th/9401072]

    1994 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036, [ 1102.0440]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090, [1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [35]

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement , JHEP 11 (2016) 028, [ 1607.07506]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [36]

    D. V. Fursaev, A. Patrushev and S. N. Solodukhin, Distributional Geometry of Squashed Cones, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 044054, [ 1306.4000]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Dong, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity , JHEP 01 (2014) 044, [ 1310.5713]

    X. Dong, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity , JHEP 01 (2014) 044, [ 1310.5713]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Camps, Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity , JHEP 03 (2014) 070, [1310.6659]

    J. Camps, Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity , JHEP 03 (2014) 070, [1310.6659]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Miao and W.-z

    R.-X. Miao and W.-z. Guo, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for the Most General Higher Derivative Gravity, JHEP 08 (2015) 031, [ 1411.5579]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074, [ 1307.2892]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Barrella, X

    T. Barrella, X. Dong, S. A. Hartnoll and V. L. Martin, Holographic entanglement beyond classical gravity, JHEP 09 (2013) 109, [ 1306.4682]. – 54 –

    2013 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Engelhardt and A

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime , JHEP 01 (2015) 073, [ 1408.3203]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Liu and M

    H. Liu and M. Mezei, A Refinement of entanglement entropy and the number of degrees of freedom, JHEP 04 (2013) 162, [ 1202.2070]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [44]

    R. C. Myers and A. Singh, Comments on Holographic Entanglement Entropy and RG Flows, JHEP 04 (2012) 122, [ 1202.2068]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [45]

    S. N. Solodukhin, Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry , Phys. Lett. B665 (2008) 305–309, [ 0802.3117]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [46]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory, JETP Lett. 43 (1986) 730–732

    1986

  40. [47]

    J. L. Cardy, Is There a c Theorem in Four-Dimensions? , Phys. Lett. B215 (1988) 749–752

    1988

  41. [48]

    Komargodski and A

    Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions , JHEP 12 (2011) 099, [ 1107.3987]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Komargodski, The Constraints of Conformal Symmetry on RG Flows , JHEP 07 (2012) 069, [1112.4538]

    Z. Komargodski, The Constraints of Conformal Symmetry on RG Flows , JHEP 07 (2012) 069, [1112.4538]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [50]

    C´ ordova, T

    C. C´ ordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Anomalies, renormalization group flows, and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1, 0) theories , JHEP 10 (2016) 080, [ 1506.03807]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Taylor and W

    M. Taylor and W. Woodhead, The holographic F theorem, 1604.06809

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem, JHEP 02 (2019) 055, [ 1810.12318]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, CriticalO(N) models in 6−ϵ dimensions, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 025018, [ 1404.1094]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [54]

    D. L. Jafferis and S. S. Pufu, Exact results for five-dimensional superconformal field theories with gravity duals , JHEP 05 (2014) 032, [ 1207.4359]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Fluder and C

    M. Fluder and C. F. Uhlemann, Precision Test of AdS 6/CFT5 in Type IIB String Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 171603, [ 1806.08374]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Giombi and I

    S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, Interpolating betweena and F , JHEP 03 (2015) 117, [1409.1937]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive scalar field in two dimensions, J. Stat. Mech. 0512 (2005) P12012, [ cond-mat/0511014]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [58]

    I. R. Klebanov, T. Nishioka, S. S. Pufu and B. R. Safdi, Is Renormalized Entanglement Entropy Stationary at RG Fixed Points? , JHEP 10 (2012) 058, [ 1207.3360]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Nishioka, Relevant Perturbation of Entanglement Entropy and Stationarity , Phys

    T. Nishioka, Relevant Perturbation of Entanglement Entropy and Stationarity , Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 045006, [ 1405.3650]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Casini, I

    H. Casini, I. S. Landea and G. Torroba, The g-theorem and quantum information theory , JHEP 10 (2016) 140, [ 1607.00390]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Teste and G. Torroba, Relative entropy and the RG flow , JHEP 03 (2017) 089, [1611.00016]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Casini, R

    H. Casini, R. Medina, I. Salazar Landea and G. Torroba, Renyi relative entropies and renormalization group flows, JHEP 09 (2018) 166, [ 1807.03305]. – 55 –

    2018 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, R. C. Myers and A. Yale, Mutual information and the F-theorem , JHEP 10 (2015) 003, [ 1506.06195]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Taylor and W

    M. Taylor and W. Woodhead, Renormalized entanglement entropy, JHEP 08 (2016) 165, [1604.06808]

    2016 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The Holographic Weyl anomaly , JHEP 07 (1998) 023, [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413–428, [ hep-th/9902121]

    1999 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Emparan, C

    R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS / CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 104001, [ hep-th/9903238]

    1999 arXiv

  61. [68]

    de Haro, S

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence , Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595–622, [hep-th/0002230]

    2001 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class

    K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849–5876, [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  63. [70]

    J. W. York, Jr., Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 1082–1085

    1972

  64. [71]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2752–2756

    1977

  65. [72]

    Fefferman and C

    C. Fefferman and C. Robin Graham, Conformal Invariants, The mathematical heritage of ´Elie Cartan, S´ emin. Lyon 1984, Ast´ erisque, No. Hors S´ er.(1985) 95–116

    1985

  66. [73]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink, The gravitational action in asymptotically AdS and flat space-times, Nucl. Phys. B563 (1999) 259–278, [ hep-th/9906127]

    1999 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry , IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 8 (2005) 73–101, [ hep-th/0404176]

    2005 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes, JHEP 08 (2005) 004, [ hep-th/0505190]

    2005 arXiv

  69. [76]

    R. Aros, M. Contreras, R. Olea, R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Conserved charges for even dimensional asymptotically AdS gravity theories , Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 044002, [hep-th/9912045]

    2000 arXiv

  70. [77]

    P. Mora, R. Olea, R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Vacuum energy in odd-dimensional AdS gravity, hep-th/0412046

    arXiv

  71. [78]

    Olea, Mass, angular momentum and thermodynamics in four-dimensional Kerr-AdS black holes, JHEP 06 (2005) 023, [ hep-th/0504233]

    R. Olea, Mass, angular momentum and thermodynamics in four-dimensional Kerr-AdS black holes, JHEP 06 (2005) 023, [ hep-th/0504233]

    2005 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Olea, Regularization of odd-dimensional AdS gravity: Kounterterms , JHEP 04 (2007) 073, [hep-th/0610230]

    R. Olea, Regularization of odd-dimensional AdS gravity: Kounterterms , JHEP 04 (2007) 073, [hep-th/0610230]

    2007 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Kofinas and R

    G. Kofinas and R. Olea, Universal regularization prescription for Lovelock AdS gravity , JHEP 11 (2007) 069, [ 0708.0782]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Giribet, O

    G. Giribet, O. Miˇ skovi´ c, R. Olea and D. Rivera-Betancour,Energy in Higher-Derivative Gravity via Topological Regularization, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 044046, [ 1806.11075]. – 56 –

    2018 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Anastasiou, I

    G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, C. Arias and R. Olea, Einstein-AdS action, renormalized volume/area and holographic Rnyi entropies , JHEP 08 (2018) 136, [ 1806.10708]

    2018 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Miˇ skovi´ c, R

    O. Miˇ skovi´ c, R. Olea and M. Tsoukalas,Renormalized AdS action and Critical Gravity , JHEP 08 (2014) 108, [ 1404.5993]

    2014 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Anastasiou and R

    G. Anastasiou and R. Olea, Holographic correlation functions in Critical Gravity , JHEP 11 (2017) 019, [ 1709.01174]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Maldacena, Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity , 1105.5632

    J. Maldacena, Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity , 1105.5632

    arXiv

  79. [86]

    Anastasiou and R

    G. Anastasiou and R. Olea, From conformal to Einstein Gravity , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 086008, [1608.07826]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Miˇ skovi´ c and R

    O. Miˇ skovi´ c and R. Olea,On boundary conditions in three-dimensional AdS gravity , Phys. Lett. B640 (2006) 101–107, [ hep-th/0603092]

    2006 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Compere and D

    G. Compere and D. Marolf, Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 195014, [ 0805.1902]

    2008 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Krishnan, A

    C. Krishnan, A. Raju and P. N. B. Subramanian, Dynamical boundary for antide Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 126011, [ 1609.06300]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Krishnan and A

    C. Krishnan and A. Raju, A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity , Mod. Phys. Lett. A32 (2017) 1750077, [ 1605.01603]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Krishnan, K

    C. Krishnan, K. V. P. Kumar and A. Raju, An alternative path integral for quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2016) 043, [ 1609.04719]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Krishnan, S

    C. Krishnan, S. Maheshwari and P. N. Bala Subramanian, Robin Gravity, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 883 (2017) 012011, [ 1702.01429]

    2017 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Miˇ skovi´ c and R

    O. Miˇ skovi´ c and R. Olea,Counterterms in Dimensionally Continued AdS Gravity , JHEP 10 (2007) 028, [ 0706.4460]

    2007 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Anastasiou, Kounterterms in Einstein Gravity and in Higher-Derivative Theories of Gravity, Ph.D

    G. Anastasiou, Kounterterms in Einstein Gravity and in Higher-Derivative Theories of Gravity, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Andr´ es Bello, 2018

    2018

  88. [96]

    C. P. Herzog, K.-W. Huang and K. Jensen, Universal Entanglement and Boundary Geometry in Conformal Field Theory , JHEP 01 (2016) 162, [ 1510.00021]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Herzog and K.-W

    C. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, Boundary Fluctuations and A Reduction Entropy , Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 021901, [ 1610.08970]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Dong, The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy , Nature Commun

    X. Dong, The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy , Nature Commun. 7 (2016) 12472, [1601.06788]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Camps and W

    J. Camps and W. R. Kelly, Generalized gravitational entropy without replica symmetry , JHEP 03 (2015) 061, [ 1412.4093]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler, SPINORS AND SPACE-TIME. VOL. 2: SPINOR AND TWISTOR METHODS IN SPACE-TIME GEOMETRY

  93. [101]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207–226. – 57 –

    1986

  94. [102]

    Imbimbo, A

    C. Imbimbo, A. Schwimmer, S. Theisen and S. Yankielowicz, Diffeomorphisms and holographic anomalies, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 1129–1138, [ hep-th/9910267]

    2000 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Miskovic and R

    O. Miskovic and R. Olea, Thermodynamics of Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes with negative cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 124048, [ 0802.2081]

    2008 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Miskovic and R

    O. Miskovic and R. Olea, Conserved charges for black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics in AdS space , Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 024011, [1009.5763]

    2011 arXiv

  97. [105]

    D. V. Fursaev and S. N. Solodukhin, On the description of the Riemannian geometry in the presence of conical defects, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 2133–2143, [ hep-th/9501127]

    1995 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Albin, Renormalizing curvature integrals on poincareinstein manifolds , Adv

    P. Albin, Renormalizing curvature integrals on poincareinstein manifolds , Adv. Math. 221 (2009) 140 – 169, [ math/0504161]

    2009 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Alexakis and R

    S. Alexakis and R. Mazzeo, Renormalized area and properly embedded minimal surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys. 297 (Aug, 2010) 621–651, [ 0802.2250]

    2010 arXiv

  100. [108]

    P. Yang, S. Y. A. Chang and J. Qing, On the renormalized volumes for conformally compact einstein manifolds, Journal of Mathematical Sciences 149 (Mar, 2008) 1755–1769, [math/0512376]

    2008 arXiv

  101. [109]

    L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers, M. Smolkin and A. Yale, Holographic Calculations of Renyi Entropy, JHEP 12 (2011) 047, [ 1110.1084]

    2011 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Schwimmer and S

    A. Schwimmer and S. Theisen, Entanglement Entropy, Trace Anomalies and Holography , Nucl. Phys. B801 (2008) 1–24, [ 0802.1017]

    2008 arXiv

  103. [111]

    M. J. Duff, Observations on Conformal Anomalies , Nucl. Phys. B125 (1977) 334–348

    1977

  104. [112]

    C. R. Graham and E. Witten, Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in AdS / CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999) 52–64, [ hep-th/9901021]

    1999 arXiv

  105. [113]

    D. P. Jatkar, G. Kofinas, O. Miskovic and R. Olea, Conformal Mass in AdS gravity , Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 124010, [ 1404.1411]

    2014 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J

    D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498–501

    1971

  107. [115]

    Lovelock, The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor , J

    D. Lovelock, The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor , J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 874–876

    1972

  108. [116]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Das, Asymptotically Anti-de Sitter space-times: Conserved quantities , Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) L17–L30, [ hep-th/9911230]

    2000 arXiv

  109. [117]

    C. R. Graham, Volume and area renormalizations for conformally compact Einstein metrics, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo S63 (2000) 31–42, [ math/9909042]. – 58 –

    2000 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.