Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

NoiseController: Towards Consistent Multi-view Video Generation via Noise Decomposition and Collaboration

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read NoiseController claims that decomposing the initial latent noise into scene-level foreground/background and individual-level shared/residual components, then collaborating them across views and frames, yields multi-view videos with…

desk verdict A practical multi-view driving video generator with a plausible noise-decomposition recipe; the gains over MagicDrive look real, but the paper needs equation fixes, hyperparameter reporting, and mask-sensitivity analysis before I'd trust it beyond the reported setting. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18448 v1 pith:ODTRMNKX submitted 2025-04-25 cs.CV

Haotian Dong , Xin Wang , Di Lin , Yipeng Wu , Qin Chen , Ruonan Liu , Kairui Yang , Ping Li
show 1 more author
Qing Guo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-viewvideogenerationnoisedecompositionspatiotemporalconsistencydiffusionmodelsautonomousdrivingjointdenoisingcollaborationlatentcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the initial noise of a multi-view video diffusion model can be structured so that cross-view and cross-frame consistency is built into the starting point of denoising, instead of being left to attention mechanisms alone. It decomposes each view's initial latent noise into scene-level background and foreground noise, further splits each into shared and residual components, then collaborates these components across six views and a sliding window of past frames before two parallel U-Nets denoise them. If this is right, it matters because the reported gains are concrete: on the driving benchmark, FVD falls from 177.3 to 122.9 and FID from 20.92 to 14.65, and training perception models on the generated videos improves detection and BEV segmentation over training without augmentation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-level decomposition of the initial latent noise. At the scene level, masks derived from 3D object boxes split each view's noise into background noise and foreground noise, each assumed standard Gaussian. At the individual level, each scene-level noise is split into a shared component, drawn with a controlled variance that enforces consistency, and a residual component, drawn with complementary variance to preserve diversity. The collaboration machinery consists of an inter-view spatiotemporal collaboration matrix and an intra-view impact collaboration matrix, computed over a sliding window of K frames; these produce the shared components for the next frame from the preceding K frames of all six views. Two parallel denoising U-Nets, one for background and one for foreground, then predict masked noise components that are summed into the final prediction. The argument is carried by the claim that this decomposition and collaboration makes the starting points of denoising consistent across views and frames, so attention alone no longer has to do that work.

What would settle it

Render the mask premise false in a controlled way: take the trained model and feed it box masks that are shifted, dilated, or replaced by random binary masks, keeping everything else fixed. If FVD and FID stay near 122.9 and 14.65, the gains do not depend on mask accuracy; if quality collapses, the reported consistency gains are contingent on precise foreground and background separation in the latent domain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At its core, the paper claims that consistency in multi-view video generation can be achieved by engineering the initial noise rather than by stacking more attention. For every view and frame, the initial latent noise is decomposed with binary masks from 3D object boxes into a background noise and a foreground noise, each modeled as standard Gaussian noise. Each of those is further split into a shared component that carries what should stay the same across views and frames, and a residual component that preserves per-frame diversity. Two learned collaboration matrices—one across views and time, one across background and foreground within a view—propagate information over a sliding window of K frames to build the shared components of the next frame, and two parallel U-Nets denoise background and foreground jointly. The paper reports state-of-the-art generation quality on the public autonomous-driving benchmark: FVD 122.9 and FID 14.65 at 224×400, improving to FVD 87.23 and FID 13.72 at 512×1024, with downstream detection and BEV segmentation also improved when the generated videos are used as training data.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme assumes that binary masks from 3D object boxes correctly separate foreground from background in the noise representation at every denoising step, so that masked noise behaves like valid input to the diffusion network.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The starting point of denoising, not attention, becomes the main carrier of spatiotemporal consistency, so the framework can be grafted onto existing video diffusion models without changing their attention design.
  • Longer multi-frame collaboration helps only up to a window of K=5; K=6 hurts under the same training budget, so pushing further needs more training rather than simply a bigger window.
  • Generated multi-view videos can serve as training data for downstream perception: detection mAP rises from 32.48 to 36.07 and road segmentation IoU from 74.30 to 80.13 compared with no augmentation.
  • The method transfers: applying it to a tracklet-conditioned video generator improves its FVD and FID as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the decomposition is driven by box-derived masks, the same scheme should extend to any conditional generator with layout control, such as indoor or object-centric multi-view synthesis; this is an extension the paper does not test.
  • The shared and residual variance coefficients set an explicit consistency-versus-diversity dial; a natural test is to tune them per downstream task rather than leave them fixed.
  • If the mask premise is the weak point, a testable improvement is replacing binary box masks with learned or semantic masks so that non-box foreground objects are not silently treated as background.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes NoiseController, a method for multi-view video generation that operates by manipulating initial latent noise. It introduces a two-level noise decomposition: scene-level decomposition into foreground and background noises via 3D-box-derived binary masks, and individual-level decomposition of each scene-level noise into shared and residual components. An inter-view spatiotemporal collaboration matrix and an intra-view impact collaboration matrix are learned to produce shared components from preceding frames, and two parallel U-Nets denoise background and foreground jointly. Experiments on nuScenes report FVD 122.9 and FID 14.65 at 224x400, and FVD 87.23 and FID 13.72 at 512x1024, outperforming prior multi-view video generation methods. The authors also report that generated videos improve downstream BEVFusion detection and CVT segmentation, and they show compatibility of the framework with MagicDrive and TrackDiffusion.

Significance. If the technical claims are correct and reproducible, NoiseController is a meaningful contribution to multi-view driving video generation. The paper provides a coherent set of ablations for its three main modules, studies the sliding window length and the two collaboration matrices, evaluates both generation quality and downstream perception, and demonstrates that the framework can be plugged into existing baselines. These are substantive strengths. However, several core equations are internally inconsistent, the values of the variance-splitting hyperparameters are not reported, and the mask construction is not validated; these issues currently prevent the reader from verifying the central mechanism or reproducing the results.

major comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (1) and Sec. 4.2, Eq. (6)] The decomposition identity is not valid as written. With M^F = 1 - M^B, the equation N^B + N^F = epsilon^B \odot M^B + epsilon^F \odot M^F equals epsilon only on the background region where epsilon equals epsilon^B and on the foreground region where epsilon equals epsilon^F. If epsilon^B and epsilon^F are independently sampled from N(0, I), as stated, the sum is a newly generated noise and not the original epsilon. This makes the ground-truth regression targets N^D_t and the training loss in Eqs. (9)-(10) ill-defined. Please either define N^B and N^F as masked versions of the same initial noise, or describe the procedure as composing a new noise rather than decomposing the original, and correct the distributional statements because masked noise is not distributed as N(0, I).
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) is internally inconsistent. The symbol epsilon^B is introduced as a tensor initialized to a constant coefficient eta^2/(eta^2+1), but the same symbol is used as a noise quantity. The summand (S_i \cdot epsilon^D_i \odot I^B_k) \odot (S_i \cdot epsilon^D_i \odot I^B_k) squares the collaboration term, which does not match the linear collaboration operation in Eq. (5). In addition, k is not defined inside the summation over i. Since L_C = L_B + L_F is part of the training objective, this equation must be corrected and its notation clarified.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 5.1] The hyperparameters eta and lambda define the variance split between shared and residual components, and they also enter the collaboration loss L_C. Their values are never reported in the implementation details or elsewhere, and no ablation over these parameters is given. Without these values, the individual-level decomposition and the training objective cannot be reproduced.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (9)] For n > 1, the regression target N^B_{n,t} is compared with a sum of terms S_i \cdot \hat N^B_{i,t} \odot I_{min}, but according to Eq. (5) the shared component for frame n is formed from the scene-level noises epsilon^D_i before masking, and the full noise at frame n also contains the independently sampled residual component. As printed, Eq. (9) does not compare the same quantities that the generation procedure produces, so the loss may not minimize the intended prediction error. Please reconcile Eq. (9) with Eq. (5).
  5. [Sec. 4.2, Figure 4 and Sec. 5.1] The central foreground/background separation relies on binary masks derived from 3D object boxes and mapped into the latent space, but the paper provides no details of how the masks are projected, no visualization of the masks in latent space, and no sensitivity analysis with respect to mask perturbation or projection error. Because the decomposition is the paper's main novelty, this missing validation leaves a load-bearing assumption unsupported.
  6. [Sec. 5.4, Table 4 and Sec. 5.1] The high-resolution variant NoiseController* is reported with state-of-the-art results (FVD 87.23, FID 13.72 at 512x1024), but the asterisk is unexplained and the main text gives no training or adaptation details for this variant. Additionally, no error bars or number of evaluation seeds are reported for the FVD/FID numbers, so the claimed margins over SubjectDrive and Panacea and the stated 30.7% and 30.0% improvements are not statistically grounded.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] In Eq. (5), the index k is used inside the summation over i but is not defined; it should be k = i - (n - K) as implied by the preceding discussion.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The phrase "We respect 6-view noises" should be rephrased, for example to "We use the 6-view noises of the preceding K frames".
  3. [Table 5 caption] The caption contains the typo "stree-view generation methods" and should read "street-view".
  4. [Conclusion] The conclusion contains the typo "multi-leve noise decomposition".
  5. [Table 4] The comparison mixes methods evaluated at different resolutions (224x400, 256x448, 256x512, 512x1024, 848x1600); since FVD and FID are resolution-dependent, the table should state this caveat or restrict the headline comparison to matched resolutions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central components are trained with external benchmarks and the decomposition targets are not fitted functions of the reported metrics.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external metrics. The multi-level noise decomposition (Eqs. 1-2) defines noise components from the initial noise and learned masks; the collaboration matrices S and I (Eqs. 4-5) are learned parameters optimized by losses (Eqs. 8-10) that do not reduce to the reported FVD/FID or downstream perception scores. The joint denoising (Eqs. 6-7) trains two U-Nets to predict masked noises, and the sum of predictions is compared to the ground-truth noise; this is a standard diffusion objective, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The paper cites prior work by the same group (Di Lin, Kairui Yang, and Qing Guo appear in refs. [19] and [39]), but those citations are background/baseline comparisons and are not load-bearing for the claimed result. No self-citation chain is used to justify the method's uniqueness or to forbid alternatives. The strongest assumption, that 3D-box-derived masks correctly partition latent noise into foreground/background, is an unvalidated input but not a circularity; it is a correctness risk. Overall, the empirical claims are evaluated against external baselines and metrics, and no specific reduction of a prediction to its inputs was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The method's load-bearing assumptions are all about the validity of noise decomposition and collaboration; the main unstated dependence is the reliability of object-box masks in latent space and the tolerability of non-standard noise.

free parameters (3)
  • eta (background shared/residual split) = not reported
    In Section 4.1, shared background noise scales as N(0, eta^2/(eta^2+1)) and residual as N(0, 1/(eta^2+1)); no value is given, so the noise decomposition is not fully specified.
  • lambda (foreground shared/residual split) = not reported
    Same as eta, used for foreground noise in Section 4.1; value not specified.
  • sliding window length K = 5
    Chosen by validation ablation in Figure 6; affects the number of preceding frames used for collaboration and the training cost.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Scene-level decomposition into masked background and foreground noises equals the original noise, with both components standard Gaussian (Eq. 1).
    Requires complementary binary masks and independence of background/foreground noise; if masks are imprecise, the decomposition does not reflect scene structure.
  • standard math Individual-level decomposition into shared and residual components with variances eta^2/(eta^2+1) and 1/(eta^2+1) (similarly lambda) preserves a standard Gaussian scene-level noise.
    Variances sum to one only if shared and residual are independent; independence is implied but not stated.
  • domain assumption Diffusion U-Nets tolerate non-standard normal distributed predicted noises, permitting two parallel U-Nets to predict masked background/foreground noises.
    The paper itself notes this relies on prior works [5,11]; if false, the joint denoising training is invalid.
  • domain assumption Learned collaboration matrices S and I, applied as linear combinations over preceding K frames, can produce consistent initial noises without distorting the noise distribution.
    There is no proof that the matrix-weighted sum of Gaussian noises remains a valid diffusion prior; the paper relies on empirical FVD/FID gains.
  • domain assumption MagicDrive pre-trained weights are a sufficient base, and fine-tuning newly added parameters plus partial U-Net layers does not break the base model's generative ability.
    Section 5.1; the method is not trained from scratch and inherits bias and capacity from MagicDrive.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NoiseController: Towards Consistent Multi-view Video Generation via Noise Decomposition and Collaboration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ODTRMNKX

@misc{pith2026250418448,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NoiseController: Towards Consistent Multi-view Video Generation via Noise Decomposition and Collaboration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ODTRMNKX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18448}
}
read the original abstract

High-quality video generation is crucial for many fields, including the film industry and autonomous driving. However, generating videos with spatiotemporal consistencies remains challenging. Current methods typically utilize attention mechanisms or modify noise to achieve consistent videos, neglecting global spatiotemporal information that could help ensure spatial and temporal consistency during video generation. In this paper, we propose the NoiseController, consisting of Multi-Level Noise Decomposition, Multi-Frame Noise Collaboration, and Joint Denoising, to enhance spatiotemporal consistencies in video generation. In multi-level noise decomposition, we first decompose initial noises into scene-level foreground/background noises, capturing distinct motion properties to model multi-view foreground/background variations. Furthermore, each scene-level noise is further decomposed into individual-level shared and residual components. The shared noise preserves consistency, while the residual component maintains diversity. In multi-frame noise collaboration, we introduce an inter-view spatiotemporal collaboration matrix and an intra-view impact collaboration matrix , which captures mutual cross-view effects and historical cross-frame impacts to enhance video quality. The joint denoising contains two parallel denoising U-Nets to remove each scene-level noise, mutually enhancing video generation. We evaluate our NoiseController on public datasets focusing on video generation and downstream tasks, demonstrating its state-of-the-art performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18448 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of NoiseController. In (a) multi-level noise decomposition, we use a decomposer to decompose the initial noises into scene-level background (B) and foreground (F) noises and individual-level noises by scaling with different coefficients, where each noise consists of individual-level shared (S) and residual (R) components. In (b) multi-frame noise collaboration, we respect the inter-view and intra-view colla… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Detailed architecture of multi-level noise decomposi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The illustration of noise masking. We utilize scene-level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Detailed architecture of joint denoising network. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparisons on the impact of sliding window length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The visualization comparison of cross-frame consistency between MagicDrive and NoiseController. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The visualization comparison of cross-view consistency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The visualization comparison of foreground details. (a), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The visualization comparison of background details. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3D and 4D World Modeling: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that defines 3D/4D world modeling, organizes methods into VideoGen, OccGen, and LiDARGen categories, and compiles datasets, metrics, and benchmark numbers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Hila Chefer, Omer Tov, Charles Herrmann, Roni Paiss, Shiran Zada, Ariel Ephrat, Junhwa Hur, Guanghui Liu, Amit Raj, et al. Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12945, 2024. 1

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dock- horn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22563–22575, 2023. 1

    2023

  3. [3]

    nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Gi- ancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11621–11631, 2020. 6

    2020

  4. [4]

    MagicDriveDiT: High-resolution long video generation for autonomous driving with adaptive con- trol, 2024

    Ruiyuan Gao, Kai Chen, Bo Xiao, Lanqing Hong, Zhenguo Li, and Qiang Xu. MagicDriveDiT: High-resolution long video generation for autonomous driving with adaptive con- trol, 2024. 8

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    MagicDrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control

    Ruiyuan Gao, Kai Chen, Enze Xie, Lanqing Hong, Zhenguo Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Qiang Xu. MagicDrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 8

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Preserve your own correlation: A noise prior for video diffusion models

    Songwei Ge, Seungjun Nah, Guilin Liu, Tyler Poon, Andrew Tao, Bryan Catanzaro, David Jacobs, Jia-Bin Huang, Ming- Yu Liu, and Yogesh Balaji. Preserve your own correlation: A noise prior for video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22930–22941, 2023. 1, 2, 3

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bern- hard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 6

    2017

  8. [8]

    Fiery: Future instance prediction in bird’s-eye view from surround monocular cameras

    Anthony Hu, Zak Murez, Nikhil Mohan, Sof´ıa Dudas, Jeffrey Hawke, Vijay Badrinarayanan, Roberto Cipolla, and Alex Kendall. Fiery: Future instance prediction in bird’s-eye view from surround monocular cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 15273–15282, 2021. 1

    work page 2021

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Subjectdrive: Scaling generative data in autonomous driving via subject control

    Binyuan Huang, Yuqing Wen, Yucheng Zhao, Yaosi Hu, Yingfei Liu, Fan Jia, Weixin Mao, Tiancai Wang, Chi Zhang, Chang Wen Chen, et al. Subjectdrive: Scaling generative data in autonomous driving via subject control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19438, 2024. 2, 8

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The lot- tery ticket hypothesis in denoising: Towards semantic-driven initialization

    Xueting Wang Jiafeng Mao and Kiyoharu Aizawa. The lot- tery ticket hypothesis in denoising: Towards semantic-driven initialization. ECCV, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  3. [11]

    Trackdiffusion: Tracklet-conditioned video generation via diffusion models

    Pengxiang Li, Kai Chen, Zhili Liu, Ruiyuan Gao, Lanqing Hong, Guo Zhou, Hua Yao, Dit-Yan Yeung, Huchuan Lu, and Xu Jia. Trackdiffusion: Tracklet-conditioned video generation via diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00651, 2023. 1, 2, 7

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Tuning-free noise rectification for high fidelity image-to-video generation

    Weijie Li, Litong Gong, Yiran Zhu, Fanda Fan, Biao Wang, Tiezheng Ge, and Bo Zheng. Tuning-free noise rectification for high fidelity image-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02827, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Drivingdiffusion: Layout-guided multi-view driving scene video generation with latent diffusion model

    Xiaofan Li, Yifu Zhang, and Xiaoqing Ye. Drivingdiffusion: Layout-guided multi-view driving scene video generation with latent diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07771,

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detec- tion

    Yinhao Li, Zheng Ge, Guanyi Yu, Jinrong Yang, Zengran Wang, Yukang Shi, Jianjian Sun, and Zeming Li. Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detec- tion. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 1477–1485, 2023. 1

    2023

  7. [15]

    Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers

    Zhiqi Li, Wenhai Wang, Hongyang Li, Enze Xie, Chonghao Sima, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. In European conference on computer vision, pages 1–18. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  8. [16]

    Bevfusion: Multi- task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view repre- sentation

    Zhijian Liu, Haotian Tang, Alexander Amini, Xinyu Yang, Huizi Mao, Daniela L Rus, and Song Han. Bevfusion: Multi- task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view repre- sentation. In 2023 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 2774–2781. I...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Wovogen: World volume-aware diffusion for control- lable multi-camera driving scene generation

    Jiachen Lu, Ze Huang, Jiahui Zhang, Zeyu Yang, and Li Zhang. Wovogen: World volume-aware diffusion for control- lable multi-camera driving scene generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02934, 2023. 1, 2, 8

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Z. Luo, D. Chen, Y . Zhang, Y . Huang, L. Wang, Y . Shen, D. Zhao, J. Zhou, and T. Tan. Notice of removal: Videofusion: Decomposed diffusion models for high-quality video gener- ation. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10209–1...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Unleashing generalization of end-to-end autonomous driving with controllable long video generation, 2024

    Enhui Ma, Lijun Zhou, Tao Tang, Zhan Zhang, Dong Han, Junpeng Jiang, Kun Zhan, Peng Jia, Xianpeng Lang, Haiyang Sun, Di Lin, and Kaicheng Yu. Unleashing generalization of end-to-end autonomous driving with controllable long video generation, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  12. [20]

    Guided image synthesis via initial image editing in diffusion model

    Jiafeng Mao, Xueting Wang, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Guided image synthesis via initial image editing in diffusion model. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 5321–5329, 2023. 1, 3

    2023

  13. [21]

    Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unproject- ing to 3d

    Jonah Philion and Sanja Fidler. Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unproject- ing to 3d. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIV 16, pages 194–210. Springer, 2020. 1

    2020

  14. [22]

    Freetraj: Tuning-free tra- jectory control in video diffusion models

    Haonan Qiu, Zhaoxi Chen, Zhouxia Wang, Yingqing He, Menghan Xia, and Ziwei Liu. Freetraj: Tuning-free tra- jectory control in video diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16863, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Freenoise: Tuning-free longer video diffusion via noise rescheduling, 2023

    Haonan Qiu, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Yingqing He, Xin- tao Wang, Ying Shan, and Ziwei Liu. Freenoise: Tuning-free longer video diffusion via noise rescheduling, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  16. [24]

    High-resolution image 9 synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image 9 synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 5

    2022

  17. [25]

    Dragdiffusion: Harnessing diffusion models for interactive point-based image editing

    Yujun Shi, Chuhui Xue, Jun Hao Liew, Jiachun Pan, Han- shu Yan, Wenqing Zhang, Vincent YF Tan, and Song Bai. Dragdiffusion: Harnessing diffusion models for interactive point-based image editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogniti...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Noisecollage: A layout-aware text-to-image diffusion model based on noise cropping and merging

    Takahiro Shirakawa and Seiichi Uchida. Noisecollage: A layout-aware text-to-image diffusion model based on noise cropping and merging. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8921–8930, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  19. [27]

    Make- a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, Devi Parikh, Sonal Gupta, and Yaniv Taigman. Make- a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. In The Eleventh International Conference on Le...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Street- view image generation from a bird’s-eye view layout

    Alexander Swerdlow, Runsheng Xu, and Bolei Zhou. Street- view image generation from a bird’s-eye view layout. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024. 8

    2024

  21. [29]

    To- wards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. To- wards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717, 2018. 6

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection

    Shihao Wang, Yingfei Liu, Tiancai Wang, Ying Li, and Xi- angyu Zhang. Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11926, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Drivedreamer: Towards real-world- driven world models for autonomous driving

    Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Guan Huang, Xinze Chen, Jia- gang Zhu, and Jiwen Lu. Drivedreamer: Towards real-world- driven world models for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09777, 2023. 2, 8

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Driving into the future: Multiview visual forecasting and planning with world model for au- tonomous driving

    Yuqi Wang, Jiawei He, Lue Fan, Hongxin Li, Yuntao Chen, and Zhaoxiang Zhang. Driving into the future: Multiview visual forecasting and planning with world model for au- tonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pa...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Panacea+: Panoramic and control- lable video generation for autonomous driving, 2024

    Yuqing Wen, Yucheng Zhao, Yingfei Liu, Binyuan Huang, Fan Jia, Yanhui Wang, Chi Zhang, Tiancai Wang, Xiaoyan Sun, and Xiangyu Zhang. Panacea+: Panoramic and control- lable video generation for autonomous driving, 2024. 2, 3, 8

    2024

  26. [34]

    Panacea: Panoramic and controllable video generation for autonomous driving

    Yuqing Wen, Yucheng Zhao, Yingfei Liu, Fan Jia, Yanhui Wang, Chong Luo, Chi Zhang, Tiancai Wang, Xiaoyan Sun, and Xiangyu Zhang. Panacea: Panoramic and controllable video generation for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patter...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Mo- tionbooth: Motion-aware customized text-to-video generation

    Jianzong Wu, Xiangtai Li, Yanhong Zeng, Jiangning Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Yining Li, Yunhai Tong, and Kai Chen. Mo- tionbooth: Motion-aware customized text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.17758, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Freeinit: Bridging initialization gap in video diffu- sion models

    Tianxing Wu, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Ziqi Huang, and Ziwei Liu. Freeinit: Bridging initialization gap in video diffu- sion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07537, 2023. 1, 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Drivescape: To- wards high-resolution controllable multi-view driving video generation

    Wei Wu, Xi Guo, Weixuan Tang, Tingxuan Huang, Chiyu Wang, Dongyue Chen, and Chenjing Ding. Drivescape: To- wards high-resolution controllable multi-view driving video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05463, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bevcontrol: Accurately controlling street-view elements with multi-perspective consistency via bev sketch layout

    Kairui Yang, Enhui Ma, Jibin Peng, Qing Guo, Di Lin, and Kaicheng Yu. Bevcontrol: Accurately controlling street-view elements with multi-perspective consistency via bev sketch layout. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01661, 2023. 8

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Video instance seg- mentation

    Linjie Yang, Yuchen Fan, and Ning Xu. Video instance seg- mentation. In ICCV, 2019. 7

    2019

  33. [41]

    Mygo: Consistent and controllable multi-view driving video genera- tion with camera control

    Yining Yao, Xi Guo, Chenjing Ding, and Wei Wu. Mygo: Consistent and controllable multi-view driving video genera- tion with camera control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06189,

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, XIAOPENG ZHANG, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, 2024. 1

    2024

  35. [43]

    Trip: Temporal residual learning with image noise prior for image-to-video diffusion models

    Zhongwei Zhang, Fuchen Long, Yingwei Pan, Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao, Yang Cao, and Tao Mei. Trip: Temporal residual learning with image noise prior for image-to-video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pa...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Drivedreamer- 2: Llm-enhanced world models for diverse driving video gen- eration

    Guosheng Zhao, Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Xinze Chen, Guan Huang, Xiaoyi Bao, and Xingang Wang. Drivedreamer- 2: Llm-enhanced world models for diverse driving video gen- eration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06845, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cross-view transform- ers for real-time map-view semantic segmentation

    Brady Zhou and Philipp Kr¨ahenb¨uhl. Cross-view transform- ers for real-time map-view semantic segmentation. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13760–13769, 2022. 6

    2022

  38. [46]

    Storydiffusion: Consistent self-attention for long-range image and video generation

    Yupeng Zhou, Daquan Zhou, Ming-Ming Cheng, Jiashi Feng, and Qibin Hou. Storydiffusion: Consistent self-attention for long-range image and video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01434, 2024. 2 10

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.