Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Giant elastoresistance in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports that uniaxial strain applied in-situ to magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene produces a gauge factor approaching 400—hundreds of times larger than in conventional metals—and that near half-filling of the moiré valence…

desk verdict The continuous strain-tuning platform and the giant elastoresistance look real; the Curie-Weiss criticality near nu=-2 is suggestive but not yet separated from domain-wall and knee artifacts. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10506 v1 pith:OFCHZDWF submitted 2025-05-15 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Xuetao Ma , Zhaoyu Liu , Jiaqi Cai , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Xiaodong Xu , Jiun-Haw Chu , Matthew Yankowitz This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords magic-angletwistedbilayergrapheneelastoresistancegaugefactoruniaxialstrainCurie-WeisslawnematicfluctuationsisospinmomentsanomalousHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish uniaxial strain as a sharp, continuously tunable probe of correlated physics in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene—two graphene sheets rotated by about 1.1° to make flat moiré bands that amplify electron interactions. The key observable is the elastoresistance, the fractional resistance change per unit strain (the gauge factor), which reaches values near 400 in devices with twist angles 1.10°–1.31°—two orders of magnitude larger than the geometric gauge factor of ordinary metals. Near $\nu=-2$, in the device whose ground state shows a strain-tunable anomalous Hall effect, the gauge factor grows on cooling and follows $GF = C/(T-\Theta)+GF_0$ over a decade in temperature. The authors interpret this Curie-Weiss divergence as a growing electronic susceptibility—plausibly nematic fluctuations or entropy from fluctuating isospin moments—and argue that in-situ strain can expose correlated behavior in moiré materials that has previously been studied mainly in bulk crystals.

What carries the argument

The central object is the gauge factor $GF = (\Delta R/R)/\Delta\epsilon = 1+2\nu_P + (\Delta\rho/\rho)/\epsilon$, which separates the geometric response of the lattice from the electronic response of the material. The load-bearing identity is the Curie-Weiss form $GF = C/(T-\Theta)+GF_0$, checked as a linear plot of $1/(GF-GF_0)$ versus $T$, which is the paper's evidence for a diverging electronic susceptibility. The enabling mechanism is a three-piezostack strain cell that applies continuous in-situ uniaxial stress to a dual-gated van der Waals device, with strain calibrated through commercial and evaporated gauges; all reported gauge factors are lower bounds because strain transmission from wafer to graphene is assumed to be perfect. Near $\nu=-2$ the divergence is tied by the authors to coupling of strain to the isospin and orbital-magnetic degrees of freedom of the correlated state.

What would settle it

Record the longitudinal and Hall resistance simultaneously while cycling strain near half-filling at a fixed small magnetic field; if every Barkhausen jump in the Hall signal coincides with a step or kink in the longitudinal signal, or if the divergence disappears when repeated strain sweeps are confined to one reproducible magnetic-domain configuration, the Curie-Weiss claim would be shown to be a domain artifact rather than an intrinsic electronic susceptibility.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that continuous uniaxial strain produces a giant elastoresistance in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle: gauge factors approaching 400, with the electronic contribution $(\Delta\rho/\rho)/\epsilon$ dominating the geometric contribution $1+2\nu_P$. The gauge factor depends sharply on band filling, exhibits features at integer moiré fillings, and generally increases on cooling. The most consequential result is near $\nu=-2$ in the 1.20° device, where $GF(T)$ follows $GF = C/(T-\Theta)+GF_0$ over a decade in temperature with a Weiss temperature near zero; the authors take this as a Curie-Weiss-like divergence of a strain-coupled electronic susceptibility. They also find that compressive strain suppresses a half-filling anomalous Hall effect and can irreversibly switch its sign, which they attribute to strain-induced reconfiguration of orbital-magnetic domains, and they discuss nematic fluctuations and heavy-fermion-like fluctuating isospin moments as candidate mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that near a doping of roughly half-filling of the moiré valence band ($\nu=-2$), the measured longitudinal resistance changes smoothly with strain; if instead strain moves magnetic domain walls and those motions leak into the resistance reading, the Curie-Weiss divergence could be a domain artifact rather than an intrinsic electronic response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uniaxial strain becomes a continuously tunable, quantitative probe of correlated moiré bands: the electronic part of the gauge factor dwarfs the geometric part, so resistance changes report on strain-induced modifications of band structure and correlations.
  • The Curie-Weiss divergence near $\nu=-2$ places the normal state of this device at the brink of an electronically ordered state, with a near-zero Weiss temperature, consistent with an incipient nematic or isospin instability.
  • The strain tunability of the anomalous Hall effect shows that orbital-magnetic domain states near half-filling can be manipulated in-situ, with compressive strain reducing the AHE amplitude and even flipping its sign.
  • The filling- and temperature-dependence of the gauge factor—dome-like with steps at integer $\nu$—parallels thermodynamic entropy measurements, connecting elastoresistance to the crossover between fluctuating local moments at high temperature and a Fermi liquid at low temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension of the strain-cell approach: measuring all in-plane resistivity tensor components ($\rho_{xx}$, $\rho_{yy}$, $\rho_{xy}$) in a device with contacts both parallel and perpendicular to the stress axis would separate the isotropic strain coupling (entropy/heavy-fermion mechanism) from the anisotropic coupling (nematic mechanism), exactly the step the paper identifies as necessary
  • If the Curie-Weiss divergence is intrinsic, a similar continuous-strain measurement on a device without hBN alignment—or on magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene—should reveal whether the divergence is generic to flat-band correlation physics or specific to the valley-ordered orbital-magnetic state of this sample.
  • The irreversible, sign-changing strain response of the anomalous Hall effect raises a caution that elastoresistance sweeps near $\nu=-2$ may move magnetic domain walls; pairing strain sweeps with simultaneous Hall readout and checking reproducibility across repeated cycles would test whether any part of the giant gauge factor is a domain-reorganization artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports in-situ uniaxial strain transport measurements on magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene (MATBG) and Bernal bilayer graphene (BBG). The authors find that MATBG devices exhibit a very large elastoresistance, with gauge factors approaching 400, two orders of magnitude above conventional metals, and strongly doping- and temperature-dependent behavior. Near half-filling of the moiré valence band (ν = -2), the gauge factor is reported to follow a Curie-Weiss form GF = C/(T - Θ) + GF0, which the authors interpret as evidence of a divergent electronic susceptibility, possibly related to nematic or isospin fluctuations. The same filling also shows a strain-tunable anomalous Hall effect with Barkhausen jumps and irreversible switching, attributed to reconfiguration of orbital-magnetic domains. The paper includes three TBG devices with different twist angles, a BBG control, detailed strain-calibration discussion in the Supplementary Information, and a discussion of possible microscopic mechanisms.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper establishes uniaxial strain as a powerful in-situ probe of correlated physics in moiré materials, with a quantitatively large elastoresistance that is unusual for a near-magic-angle graphene system. The strength of the paper is the direct transport observation in multiple TBG devices and a BBG control, together with transparent Supplementary Information that explains the strain calibration, acknowledges the lower-bound nature of the reported gauge factors, and provides fitting criteria for the Curie-Weiss analysis. The device-to-device consistency and the BBG comparison make the giant elastoresistance claim credible. The Curie-Weiss interpretation is a more delicate claim, and the manuscript itself contains an important caveat: the same filling and device show strain-dependent domain-wall behavior that could contaminate the longitudinal resistance used to extract the gauge factor. The significance of the microscopic claim therefore depends on resolving this contamination, but the experimental platform and the main elastoresistance observation are valuable regardless.

major comments (2)
  1. [Strain-tunable anomalous Hall effect and Curie-Weiss law behavior near ν=-2 (Fig. 4 and SI Fig. 12)] The Curie-Weiss interpretation of GF(T) near ν=-2 is not cleanly separated from domain-wall and resistance-knee artifacts that the paper itself documents at the same filling. The main text attributes the strain response of the anomalous Hall effect to a probable microscopic reconfiguration of orbital-magnetic domains, and SI Fig. 12 shows irreversible jumps in ρxy during Vp sweeps that are attributed to domain-wall motion. If strain changes the domain configuration, then domain-wall scattering can contribute to ρxx, and the strain derivative of ρxx would not be a purely equilibrium electronic susceptibility. In addition, Fig. 4b shows that GF(T) tracks the strain-induced spread of ρxx(T) through the sharp low-temperature knee; a strain-shifted knee alone can produce a peaking and downturn in GF(T) that mimics a Curie-Weiss form over a limited temperature window. I ask the authors to provide evidence that ρxx in this filling range is free of strain-dependent domain-wall contributions—for example, by showing that Rxx(Vp) sweeps are reversible in the same conditions, or by comparing GF extracted in a configuration where the AHE/domain effects are suppressed—and to explicitly model the strain-shifted knee scenario as a null hypothesis for the Curie-Weiss claim.
  2. [SI 'Assessment of the Curie-Weiss fitting' and Fig. 4c inset] The Curie-Weiss fit uses three parameters (C, Θ, and GF0) over a narrow doping range in a single device. The linearity of (GF - GF0)^{-1} versus T is not an independent confirmation of the functional form because GF0 is a fitted parameter chosen to optimize this linearity. The SI criteria (R² close to 1, GF0 close to zero, and fit over at least a decade in T) are reasonable, but the authors should demonstrate additional robustness: for example, fits with GF0 fixed to zero, the sensitivity of C and Θ to the fitting interval, and a comparison of the residuals against the alternative scenario of a strain-shifted low-temperature knee. Without this, the claim that the divergence is a genuine Curie-Weiss electronic response remains under-supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplementary Information Fig. 12 caption] The phrase 'in the the anomalous Hall loop' contains a duplicated article; it should read 'in the anomalous Hall loop'.
  2. [Main text, first paragraph of 'Giant elastoresistance in MATBG'] The phrase 'zero strain state of the the sample' contains a duplicated 'the'; please correct it.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] '95% confident interval' should be '95% confidence interval'.
  4. [Eq. (1) and notation] The symbol ν is used both for the band filling factor and for the Poisson ratio (νP); although the subscript helps, the distinction could be made more explicit near Eq. (1) to avoid confusion for readers who encounter both in the same paragraph.
  5. [SI 'Strain calibration'] The authors state that Vp = -20 V corresponds to zero external strain based on cryogenic Raman spectroscopy in one prior device. This is an important calibration assumption; it would be helpful to state explicitly in the main text that this reference point is not measured in the present devices, even though the SI is transparent about it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the elastoresistance and Curie-Weiss behavior are measured quantities, not derived from their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental observations. GF is defined as (ΔR/R)/Δε from measured longitudinal resistance and a strain calibration; the calibration stems from Ref. 20, a separately published apparatus paper with commercial strain gauges and Raman verification, so it is independent support rather than a circular input. The Curie-Weiss form GF = C/(T−Θ) + GF0 is fitted retroactively to the measured GF(T) data with stated criteria (R2≈1, small GF0, at least a decade in temperature; SI Fig. 8); the parameters C, Θ, GF0 are outputs of the fit, not inputs used to construct the observation. The paper explicitly notes the Curie-Weiss behavior is not universal, that no clear Curie-Weiss regime is seen at other fillings, and that microscopic origins such as nematic fluctuations and isospin entropy are speculative ('We discuss possible microscopic origins' and 'We speculate'). The possible contamination of ρxx by strain-driven domain reorganization near ν=−2 is a physical alternative interpretation and a correctness risk, not a definitional circularity: no equation in the paper sets GF or the Curie-Weiss form equal to an input by construction. Self-citations (Ref. 20 apparatus, Ref. 26 prior sample analysis) are descriptive, and the load is carried by the present transport data. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on calibrated strain, a linear strain response, the Curie-Weiss fitting model, and the absence of domain-wall contamination near ν=-2. These are stated or fitted, not independently verified.

free parameters (5)
  • Strain transmission ratio from Si wafer to graphene = Assumed 1 (perfect); measured wafer-to-cell transmission 0.15 to 0.19; 0.176 assumed for θ=1.31 device
    The gauge factor is computed by converting Vp to ε under the assumption of perfect transmission from wafer to graphene. If actual transmission is lower, GF is larger, so this is a conservative bound. The 0.176 value is an average from other devices used where the on-chip gold gauge failed.
  • Zero-strain reference Vp = -20 V
    All strain values are reported relative to Vp=-20 V, defined as approximately zero external strain from Raman spectroscopy in one prior device. There is no measured absolute zero-strain state.
  • Curie-Weiss offset GF0 = Near zero by fitting criterion
    In the fit GF = C/(T-Θ) + GF0, GF0 is a fitted temperature-independent offset. The authors require it to be close to zero and use it to construct the 1/(GF-GF0) linearized plot.
  • Weiss temperature Θ = Near zero (95% confidence interval shown)
    Fitted from GF(T) data near ν=-2 in the θ=1.20° device. The near-zero value is central to the quantum-critical interpretation.
  • Curie constant C = Not reported in main text
    Fitted amplitude in the Curie-Weiss law. It is part of the three-parameter model but is not used to derive any further claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The applied piezo voltage produces a uniaxial strain state in the graphene channel that is proportional to Vp over the measured range.
    Used to define a linear gauge factor. The authors note nonlinearity in the θ=1.10° device and assume linearity elsewhere (SI Fig. 6).
  • domain assumption The resistance changes measured as Vp is swept are caused by strain in the graphene lattice and not by spurious effects such as gate capacitance changes, contact resistance, or magnetic domain motion.
    Load-bearing for interpreting ΔR/R as elastoresistance. Particularly relevant near ν=-2, where AHE domain walls move with strain.
  • ad hoc to paper The Curie-Weiss form GF = C/(T-Θ) + GF0 is an appropriate model for the temperature dependence, with GF0 small and fit over at least a decade in T.
    This is the fitting model used to claim Curie-Weiss behavior. It is introduced specifically in this paper and verified only in a narrow doping region near ν=-2.
  • domain assumption The moiré unit cell area and filling factor do not change measurably with strain over the experimental range, so ν remains the same for all ε.
    The authors derive that homo- and heterostrain change ns by 0.045% to 0.17%, below resolution. They use a single ν conversion for all strain values (SI, Landau fans).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant elastoresistance in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFCHZDWF

@misc{pith2026250510506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant elastoresistance in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFCHZDWF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10506}
}
abstract

Strongly correlated and topological phases in moir\'e materials are exquisitely sensitive to lattice geometry at both atomic and superlattice length scales. Twist angle, pressure, and strain directly modify the lattice, and thus act as highly effective tuning parameters. Here we examine electrical transport in twisted bilayer graphene subjected to continuous uniaxial strain. Near the magic angle ($\approx 1.1^{\circ}$), devices exhibit a pronounced elastoresistance that depends on band filling and temperature, with a gauge factor more than two orders of magnitude larger than that of conventional metals. In selected doping regimes the elastoresistance exhibits a Curie-Weiss-like temperature divergence. We discuss possible microscopic origins, including nematic fluctuations and enhanced electronic entropy from fluctuating isospin moments. Our work establishes uniaxial strain as a versatile probe of correlated physics in a moir\'e material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10506 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Crucially, the elastoresistance is approximately linear with Vp in most measurements (Supplementary Informa￾tion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pseudomagnetotransport in Strained Graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A scaling transformation for strained graphene preserves pseudogauge fields and enables quantum transport simulations showing valley-polarized pseudomagnetic focusing and snake-state oscillations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R., Efetov, D

    Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands. Nature Physics 16, 725–733 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Andrei, E. Y. & MacDonald, A. H. Graphene bilayers with a twist. Nature Materials 19, 1265–1275 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Nuckolls, K. P. & Yazdani, A. A microscopic perspective on moir´ e materials.Nature Reviews Materials 9, 460–480 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    C., Sinha, S., Agarwal, A

    Adak, P. C., Sinha, S., Agarwal, A. & Deshmukh, M. M. Tunable moir´ e materials for probing Berry physics and topology. Nature Reviews Materials 9, 481–498 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    & Huang, C

    Wolf, T., Wei, N., Zhou, H. & Huang, C. Magnetism in the dilute electron gas of rhombohedral multilayer graphene. arXiv:2408.15884 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half- filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019)

    2019

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Kwan, Y. H. et al. Kekul´ e spiral order at all nonzero in- teger fillings in twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review X 11, 041063 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    H., Bultinck, N., Simon, S

    Wagner, G., Kwan, Y. H., Bultinck, N., Simon, S. H. & Parameswaran, S. A. Global phase diagram of the normal state of twisted bilayer graphene.Physical Review Letters 128, 156401 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Finney, J. et al. Unusual magnetotransport in twisted bilayer graphene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2118482119 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Nuckolls, K. P. et al. Quantum textures of the many- body wavefunctions in magic-angle graphene. Nature 620, 525–532 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Kapfer, M. et al. Programming twist angle and strain profiles in 2D materials. Science 381, 677–681 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    N., Bockrath, M

    Lau, C. N., Bockrath, M. W., Mak, K. F. & Zhang, F. Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moir´ e materials. Nature 602, 41–50 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Chu, J.-H., Kuo, H.-H., Analytis, J. G. & Fisher, I. R. Divergent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide su- perconductor. Science 337, 710–712 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    W., Jerzembeck, F., Noad, H

    Hicks, C. W., Jerzembeck, F., Noad, H. M., Barber, M. E. & Mackenzie, A. P. Probing quantum materials with uniaxial stress. Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics 16 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    W., Barber, M

    Hicks, C. W., Barber, M. E., Edkins, S. D., Brodsky, D. O. & Mackenzie, A. P. Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning. Review of Scientific Instruments 85, 065003 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Cenker, J. et al. Reversible strain-induced magnetic phase transition in a van der Waals magnet.Nature Nan- otechnology 17, 256–261 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Hwangbo, K. et al. Strain tuning of vestigial three-state Potts nematicity in a correlated antiferromagnet. Nature Physics 20, 1888–1895 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Liu, Z. et al. Continuously tunable uniaxial strain con- trol of van der Waals heterostructure devices. Journal of Applied Physics 135, 204306 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Elastoresistance of n-type silicon on sap- phire

    Hynecek, J. Elastoresistance of n-type silicon on sap- phire. Journal of Applied Physics 45, 2631–2635 (1974)

    1974

  14. [22]

    Polshyn, H. et al. Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature Physics 15, 1011– 1016 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Rozen, A. et al. Entropic evidence for a Pomeranchuk effect in magic-angle graphene. Nature 592, 214–219 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Saito, Y. et al. Isospin Pomeranchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 592, 220–224 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Heavy fermions, mass renormal- ization and local moments in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene via planar tunneling spectroscopy. arXiv:2503.17875 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Tseng, C.-C. et al. Anomalous Hall effect at half filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature Physics 18, 1038–1042 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Cao, Y. et al. Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation. Physical Review Letters 124, 076801 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Jaoui, A. et al. Quantum critical behaviour in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature Physics 18, 633– 638 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Grover, S. et al. Chern mosaic and Berry-curvature mag- netism in magic-angle graphene. Nature Physics 18, 885– 892 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Wang, X. et al. Unusual magnetotransport in twisted bi- layer graphene from strain-induced open Fermi surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2307151120 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Bi, Z., Yuan, N. F. Q. & Fu, L. Designing flat bands by strain. Physical Review B 100, 035448 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Nam, N. N. T. & Koshino, M. Lattice relaxation and en- ergy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys- ical Review B 96, 075311 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    & Bernevig, B

    Song, Z.-D. & Bernevig, B. A. Magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem. Physical Review Letters 129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    C., Zou, L., Senthil, T

    Po, H. C., Zou, L., Senthil, T. & Vishwanath, A. Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 99, 195455 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    C., Vishwanath, A

    Carr, S., Fang, S., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Kaxi- ras, E. Derivation of wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding Hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: 8 First-principles approach. Physical Review Research 1, 033072 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Calder´ on, M. J. & Bascones, E. Interactions in the 8- orbital model for twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Re- view B 102, 155149 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Kang, J., Bernevig, B. A. & Vafek, O. Cascades between light and heavy fermions in the normal state of magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Letters 127, 266402 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    & Dai, X

    Shi, H. & Dai, X. Heavy-fermion representation for twisted bilayer graphene systems. Physical Review B 106, 245129 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    J., Camjayi, A

    Datta, A., Calder´ on, M. J., Camjayi, A. & Bascones, E. Heavy quasiparticles and cascades without symmetry breaking in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature Communi- cations 14, 5036 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Luque Merino, R. et al. Evidence of heavy fermion physics in the thermoelectric transport of magic angle twisted bilayer graphene. arXiv:2402.11749 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ghosh, A. et al. Thermopower probes of emergent local moments in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene.Nature Physics (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Wiecki, P. et al. Dominant in-plane symmetric elas- toresistance in CsFe 2As2. Physical Review Letters 125, 187001 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Wiecki, P. et al. Emerging symmetric strain response and weakening nematic fluctuations in strongly hole-doped iron-based superconductors. Nature Communications 12, 4824 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Zhang, N. J. et al. Angular interplay of nematicity, su- perconductivity, and strange metallicity in a moir´ e flat band. arXiv:2503.15767 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jiang, Y. et al. Charge order and broken rotational sym- metry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 573, 91–95 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Fernandes, R. M. & Venderbos, J. W. F. Nematicity with a twist: Rotational symmetry breaking in a moir´ e superlattice. Science Advances 6, eaba8834 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Cao, Y. et al. Nematicity and competing orders in super- conducting magic-angle graphene. Science 372, 264–271 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Worasaran, T. et al. Nematic quantum criticality in an Fe-based superconductor revealed by strain-tuning. Sci- ence 372, 973–977 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    & Kivelson, S

    Lederer, S., Schattner, Y., Berg, E. & Kivelson, S. A. Superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid behavior near a nematic quantum critical point. Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer- ica 114, 4905–4910 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    T., He, X

    Wu, J., Bollinger, A. T., He, X. & Bozovic, I. Sponta- neous breaking of rotational symmetry in copper oxide superconductors. Nature 547, 432–435 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Zhang, N. J. et al. Angle-resolved transport non- reciprocity and spontaneous symmetry breaking in twisted trilayer graphene. Nature Materials 23, 356–362 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Li, H. et al. Electrode-free anodic oxidation nanolithog- raphy of low-dimensional materials. Nano Letters 18, 8011–8015 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Wang, L. et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Moir´ e straintronics: A universal platform for reconfigurable quantum materials

    K¨ ogl, M.et al. Moir´ e straintronics: A universal platform for reconfigurable quantum materials. npj 2D Materials and Applications 7, 32 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Chen, C. et al. Strong electron–phonon coupling in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 636, 342– 347 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Birkbeck, J. et al. Quantum twisting microscopy of phonons in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 345–351 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    & Son, Y.-W

    Koshino, M. & Son, Y.-W. Moir´ e phonons in twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 100, 075416 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Moir´ e-pattern fluctuations and electron– phason coupling in twisted bilayer graphene

    Ochoa, H. Moir´ e-pattern fluctuations and electron– phason coupling in twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 100, 155426 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Wu, F., MacDonald, A. H. & Martin, I. Theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Letters 121, 257001 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    zero-strain

    Lian, B., Wang, Z. & Bernevig, B. A. Twisted bilayer graphene: A phonon-driven superconductor. Physical Review Letters 122, 257002 (2019). 9 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Device fabrication. Mechanically exfoliated monolayer and Bernal bilayer graphene flakes were identified using...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.