Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 205 references

A Tutorial on Non-Terrestrial Networks: Towards Global and Ubiquitous 6G Connectivity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A tutorial argues that satellites and aerial platforms are not an add-on to 6G but a core part of it, backed by 3GPP Releases 17-19.

desk verdict Good broad survey, but the 3GPP standards section has concrete frequency-plan errors that undermine its main value until corrected. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16611 v1 pith:OFNIBUYU submitted 2024-12-21 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT

classification eess.SPcs.ITmath.IT
keywords Non-TerrestrialNetworks(NTN)6G3GPPstandardizationArtificialIntelligence(AI)DeepReinforcementLearning(DRL)ReconfigurableIntelligentSurfaces(RIS)NextGenerationMultipleAccess(NGMA)LEOsatellites
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This tutorial paper argues that non-terrestrial networks—satellites, high-altitude platforms, and drones—are a central component of the path to 6G, not a niche add-on. It traces how the 3GPP standardization process moved NTN from study items in Releases 14-16 to normative specifications in Release 17, with Release 18 adding new bands and Release 19 targeting regenerative payloads and IoT enhancements. The paper surveys the main enabling technologies—AI and deep reinforcement learning, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, and next-generation multiple access—and claims that together they address NTN's core challenges of latency, Doppler shift, channel estimation, power, and interference. A sympathetic reader would take away a structured map of where NTN stands and which directions are considered viable for global ubiquitous connectivity.

What carries the argument

The paper's argument is carried by two organizing devices. The first is the 3GPP release timeline (Releases 15-19), which shows NTN moving from study items to normative specifications; that timeline is the evidence that NTN is a real standard trajectory rather than a research wish. The second is the distinction between transparent (bent-pipe) and regenerative satellite payloads, which determines where on-board processing and AI can reside and shapes what standards support is needed. Around these, the tutorial organizes its technical survey around three enablers: AI/DRL for optimization and trajectory planning, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for coverage and Doppler compensation, and rate-splitting multiple access for interference management.

What would settle it

Read the paper's account of Release 17 alongside the actual 3GPP TS 23.501, TS 23.502, and TS 23.503 documents: the paragraph names TS 23.501 twice and omits TS 23.503, so if similar mislabels appear throughout, the standards synthesis is not reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that NTN-based 6G is a standards-backed convergence of space, aerial, and terrestrial networks. It establishes this by walking through 3GPP Releases 15-19: the transparent and regenerative payload architectures, the introduction of FR1 bands n255/n256 in Release 17, the FR2 Ka-band bands n510/n511/n512 and network-verified location in Release 18, and the planned regenerative, store-and-forward, and RedCap work in Release 19. It then argues that the problems these systems face—long round-trip delay, fast satellite motion, severe Doppler, limited onboard power, and interference from dense constellations—have credible technical answers in AI/DRL-based optimization, RIS-assisted beamforming and Doppler compensation, and rate-splitting multiple access, which it presents as a unifying interference-management framework. The claimed payoff: integrated TN/NTN can extend connectivity to the 2.9 billion people currently offline and support IoT, disaster response, and backhaul in remote areas.

Load-bearing premise

The tutorial is only as reliable as its synthesis of the 3GPP release history and its selection of surveyed research; if that synthesis misstates the standards or cherry-picks the literature, the guidance it offers would mislead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Release 17 marks the first normative NTN specifications, and Release 18 adds Ka-band FR2 operation and network-verified UE location, so standards-based satellite access is already specified rather than hypothetical.
  • Release 19 introduces regenerative payloads, store-and-forward operation, and RedCap devices over NR-NTN, extending service to discontinuous coverage and delay-tolerant IoT.
  • The paper argues that AI and DRL, RIS, and RSMA/NGMA form the main problem-solving toolkit for NTN, addressing energy efficiency, trajectory optimization, Doppler, and interference.
  • Integrated NTN-TN backhaul and fronthaul using UAVs, HAPS, and satellites can extend coverage to remote areas, disaster zones, and high-rise users.
  • Future directions such as OTFS modulation, blockchain-based resource management, and generative AI are identified as solutions for high-mobility and security challenges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the standardization trajectory holds beyond the paper's snapshot, direct-to-handset satellite access could become a default phone capability, removing the need for separate satellite devices.
  • The paper's treatment of RSMA suggests that future interference management in dense LEO constellations may shift from orthogonal allocation to rate-splitting; that is the authors' implicit bet, not a proven deployment.
  • A reader could test the survey's practical claims by benchmarking RSMA against NOMA and SDMA in a simulated LEO-GEO coexistence scenario with imperfect channel knowledge; the paper does not provide such a benchmark.
  • Because the tutorial synthesizes a fast-moving standard, its conclusions will need revision as Release 19 work items such as store-and-forward, regenerative payloads, and Ku-band support are finalized.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a tutorial-style survey of Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) for 6G. It opens with the IMT-2030 vision, reviews 3GPP NTN standardization across Releases 15-19, and then surveys AI/deep reinforcement learning for NTN, UAV trajectory and placement optimization, aerial fronthaul/backhaul, next-generation multiple access (notably RSMA), RIS-empowered NTN, and concludes with challenges and future directions. The paper contains no new mathematical derivations or simulation results; its contribution is intended to be a comprehensive, accurate synthesis of the 3GPP standards history and the recent research literature, presented for readers entering the field.

Significance. The tutorial fills a useful niche: it gathers a large body of recent NTN research (over 200 references) into a single accessible document, and its discussions of RSMA, RIS, and UAV placement are pedagogically clear. The paper is also explicit about the 3GPP Release structure, which is valuable for newcomers. However, the central claim of the paper is that it is a reliable and comprehensive tutorial aligned with 3GPP Releases 15-19. That claim is weakened by multiple concrete errors in Section II.A, which is the section most readers would use as a primary reference for band plans and standard documents. A tutorial whose main value is accurate synthesis must have its standards summary correct; as written, it currently teaches at least one impossible frequency plan (n255) and one reversed link direction (n510/n511/n512). If the authors correct these and carefully cross-check the rest of the standards overview against primary 3GPP specifications, the paper can be a useful contribution. At present it is not yet reliable enough for that role.

major comments (4)
  1. [II.A.3] The sentence describing the SA2-led Release 17 work item lists the resulting specifications as 'TS 23.501 (System architecture for the 5G system), TS 23.502 (procedures for the 5G system) and TS 23.501 (Policy and charging control framework for the 5G system).' The third document should be TS 23.503; as written, the same TS number is given twice. This is a clear factual error in the standards summary and must be corrected, since the tutorial's central claim is accurate alignment with 3GPP Releases 15-19.
  2. [II.A.3] The paper states that band n255 operates 'the uplink at 1626 - 1660 MHz and the downlink at 1525 - 1659 MHz.' In 3GPP TS 38.101-5, the n255 downlink is 1525-1559 MHz and the uplink is 1626-1660 MHz; the downlink range given here overlaps the uplink range (1560-1659 MHz), which is physically impossible for FDD. This is not a formatting typo but an incorrect band definition, and it directly affects readers using the tutorial as a reference for FR1 NTN spectrum.
  3. [II.A.4] The description of Release 18 Ka-band bands states that n510, n511, and n512 operate 'uplink in the 17 - 20 GHz range and downlink in 27 - 30 GHz range.' According to 3GPP TS 38.104, the UE transmit (uplink) direction for these NR NTN bands is in the 27.5-30 GHz range and the UE receive (downlink) direction is in the 17.7-20.2 GHz range. The link directions in the paper are therefore reversed. Since this section is the primary standards reference of the tutorial, this error is load-bearing and must be fixed and verified against the cited specification.
  4. [VIII.A.4] The resource management discussion states that 'the frequency bands designated for NTN communications, namely the S-band and the Ka-band, are limited and already heavily used. The S band is occupied by 4G LTE devices, while the Ka-band is used by devices equipped with millimeter wave in 5G.' This is an oversimplification that is likely to mislead: LTE uses many bands across UHF and lower microwave frequencies, not 'the S band' as a whole, and 5G millimeter-wave deployments (e.g., n257/n258/n260/n261) do not generally occupy the same Ka-band allocations as satellite downlinks. The authors should rephrase this to describe actual spectrum sharing scenarios, ideally with reference to the relevant 3GPP band definitions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [V] The section title reads 'FLYING PLATFORMS BASED FRONTHAUL /BACKHAUL' and the surrounding text uses 'flaying' in place of 'flying' (e.g., 'Integration of flaying platforms'). These typos should be corrected.
  2. [VI.A.4] The heading 'Rate-Spitting Multiple Access' contains a typo; it should read 'Rate-Splitting Multiple Access.'
  3. [III.C] The R-Studio discussion says 'R-Studio has cret, and forecast for data modeling.' The intended packages are likely 'caret' and 'forecast'; the fragment 'cret' is incomplete and should be fixed.
  4. [VIII.A.1] The text states that 'LEO satellites have latencies that range from tens of milliseconds to tens of milliseconds.' This should presumably read 'tens to hundreds of milliseconds' or a similar meaningful range; as written it is vacuous.
  5. [Fig. 2] The abbreviation 'FR' in the figure is defined as 'Frequency Reuse,' but in the text 'FR1' and 'FR2' are used to denote Frequency Ranges 1 and 2. This inconsistency should be resolved to avoid confusing readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is a descriptive survey; self-citations are independent literature pointers for tutorial context, not load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

This is a tutorial/survey paper; it contains no derivations, no fitted parameters, and no quantitative predictions. Its central claim is that it 'provides a comprehensive exploration' of NTN-based 6G, which is a descriptive completeness claim that stands or falls on the accuracy of its reporting of 3GPP Releases 15-19 and the surveyed literature. The standards summary in Sec. II.A is sourced to external 3GPP documents and a 3GPP web overview [15]; any errors there (e.g., the duplicated TS 23.501 entry or the questionable n255/n510 frequency directions identified by a reader) would be factual accuracy problems, not evidence that an output was equated with an input by construction. The paper cites several works by its own authors ([22], [130], [137], [139], [141], [190], [205]), but in each case the citation is used as a pointer to an independently published article, not as the sole justification for a contested premise, and no claim is derived by citing the authors' own prior result as an external theorem. There is no equation that reduces to a fitted value, no parameter renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness argument imported from the authors' prior work. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its assumptions are the general reliability of its sources and the relevance of NTN to 6G.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Non-terrestrial networks are a key component of 6G as envisioned by ITU-R and 3GPP.
    The entire tutorial is built around this framing; if NTN is not central to 6G, much of the content is moot.
  • domain assumption The surveyed results from cited literature are correct and are represented accurately.
    The tutorial relies on the accuracy of its sources and its own paraphrases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Tutorial on Non-Terrestrial Networks: Towards Global and Ubiquitous 6G Connectivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFNIBUYU

@misc{pith2026241216611,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Tutorial on Non-Terrestrial Networks: Towards Global and Ubiquitous 6G Connectivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFNIBUYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16611}
}
read the original abstract

The International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT)-2030 framework recently adopted by the International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) envisions 6G networks to deliver intelligent, seamless connectivity that supports reliable, sustainable, and resilient communications. Recent developments in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Releases 17-19, particularly within the Radio Access Network (RAN)4 working group addressing satellite and cellular spectrum sharing and RAN2 enhancing New Radio (NR)/IoT for NTN, highlight the critical role NTN is set to play in the evolution of 6G standards. The integration of advanced signal processing, edge and cloud computing, and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites and aerial platforms, such as Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and high-, medium-, and low-altitude platform stations, has revolutionized the convergence of space, aerial, and Terrestrial Networks (TN). Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered deployments for NTN and NTN-IoT, combined with Next Generation Multiple Access (NGMA) technologies, have dramatically reshaped global connectivity. This tutorial paper provides a comprehensive exploration of emerging NTN-based 6G wireless networks, covering vision, alignment with 5G-Advanced and 6G standards, key principles, trends, challenges, real-world applications, and novel problem solving frameworks. It examines essential enabling technologies like AI for NTN (LEO satellites and aerial platforms), DRL, edge computing for NTN, AI for NTN trajectory optimization, Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS)-enhanced NTN, and robust Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) beamforming. Furthermore, it addresses interference management through NGMA, including Rate-Splitting Multiple Access (RSMA) for NTN, and the use of aerial platforms for access, relay, and fronthaul/backhaul connectivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16611 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An illustration of convergence/co-existence of NTN and TN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of 3GPP timeline indicating the start of NTN incorporation and future [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Transparent versus Regenerative payload. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of AI-based IoT NTN networks for edge-cloud computing based intelligent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of AI-life cycle for NTN networks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The process of UAV trajectory planning and placement optimization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overview of NTN based fronthaul and backhaul links [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of resource distribution procedures for various NGMA strategies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Technical challenges of interference management for various NTN environments. SU: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

205 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Challenges, applications, and future of wireless sensors in internet of things: A review,

    M. A. Jamshed, K. Ali, Q. H. Abbasi, M. A. Imran, and M. Ur-Rehman, “Challenges, applications, and future of wireless sensors in internet of things: A review,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5482–5494, 2022

  2. [2]

    Toward integrated sensing and communications for 6G: Key enabling technologies, standardization, and challenges,

    A. Kaushik, R. Singh, S. Dayarathna, R. Senanayake, M. Di Renzo, M. Dajer, H. Ji, Y . Kim, V . Sciancalepore, A. Zappone, and W. Shien, “Toward integrated sensing and communications for 6G: Key enabling technologies, standardization, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 52–59, 2024

  3. [3]

    When the IoT meets IRS: Intelligent reflecting surfaces for massive IoT connectivity,

    M. A. Jamshed and F. Jameel, “When the IoT meets IRS: Intelligent reflecting surfaces for massive IoT connectivity,” Internet of Things Newsletter, accessed , pp. 01–27, 2020

  4. [4]

    Review of 5G NTN standards development and technical challenges for satellite integration with the 5G network,

    M. Hosseinian, J. P. Choi, S.-H. Chang, and J. Lee, “Review of 5G NTN standards development and technical challenges for satellite integration with the 5G network,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine , vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 22–31, 2021

  5. [5]

    Non-terrestrial networks in 5G & beyond: A survey,

    F. Rinaldi, H.-L. Maattanen, J. Torsner, S. Pizzi, S. Andreev, A. Iera, Y . Koucheryavy, and G. Araniti, “Non-terrestrial networks in 5G & beyond: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 165 178–165 200, 2020

  6. [6]

    Energy-efficient semantic communication for aerial-aided edge networks,

    G. Zheng, Q. Ni, K. Navaie, H. Pervaiz, A. Kaushik, and C. Zarakovitis, “Energy-efficient semantic communication for aerial-aided edge networks,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking , 2024

  7. [7]

    Toward 6G non-terrestrial networks,

    G. Araniti, A. Iera, S. Pizzi, and F. Rinaldi, “Toward 6G non-terrestrial networks,” IEEE Network , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2021

  8. [8]

    Non-terrestrial networks: Have we found that ultimate catalyst for global connectivity in 6G?

    A. Kaushik and M. Z. Shakir, “Non-terrestrial networks: Have we found that ultimate catalyst for global connectivity in 6G?” IEEE Communications Technology News (CTN) , 2022

Show all 205 references
  1. [9]

    Integrating terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: 3D opportunities and challenges,

    G. Geraci, D. L ´opez-P´erez, M. Benzaghta, and S. Chatzinotas, “Integrating terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: 3D opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 42–48, 2022

  2. [10]

    UA V communications in integrated terrestrial and non- terrestrial networks,

    M. Benzaghta, G. Geraci, R. Nikbakht, and D. L ´opez-P´erez, “UA V communications in integrated terrestrial and non- terrestrial networks,” in IEEE Global Communications Conference . IEEE, 2022, pp. 3706–3711

  3. [11]

    Towards 6G evolution: Three enhancements, three innovations, and three major challenges,

    R. Singh, A. Kaushik, W. Shin, M. Di Renzo, V . Sciancalepore, D. Lee, H. Sasaki, A. Shojaeifard, and O. A. Dobre, “Towards 6G evolution: Three enhancements, three innovations, and three major challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10781, 2024

  4. [12]

    Integrated sensing and communications for IoT: Synergies with key 6G technology enablers,

    A. Kaushik, R. Singh, M. Li, H. Luo, S. Dayarathna, R. Senanayake, X. An, R. A. Stirling-Gallacher, W. Shin, and M. Di Renzo, “Integrated sensing and communications for IoT: Synergies with key 6G technology enablers,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , 2024

  5. [13]

    Satellite edge computing with collaborative computation offloading: An 69 intelligent deep deterministic policy gradient approach,

    H. Zhang, R. Liu, A. Kaushik, and X. Gao, “Satellite edge computing with collaborative computation offloading: An 69 intelligent deep deterministic policy gradient approach,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 9092–9107, 2023

  6. [14]

    Cmwave and sub-THz: Key radio enablers and complementary spectrum for 6G,

    M. V . Katwe, A. Kaushik, K. Singh, M. Di Renzo, S. Sun, D. Lee, A. G. Armada, Y . C. Eldar, O. A. Dobre, and T. S. Rappaport, “Cmwave and sub-THz: Key radio enablers and complementary spectrum for 6G,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18391, 2024

  7. [15]

    3GPP Technologies - Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN),

    3rd Generation Partnership Project, “3GPP Technologies - Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN),” May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/technologies/ntn-overview

  8. [16]

    Non-terrestrial networks: An overview of 3GPP release 17 & 18,

    M. M. Saad, M. A. Tariq, M. T. R. Khan, and D. Kim, “Non-terrestrial networks: An overview of 3GPP release 17 & 18,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2024

  9. [17]

    Multicore energy efficient scheduling with energy harvesting for wireless multimedia sensor networks,

    M. A. Jamshed, O. Amjad, and E. Zeydan, “Multicore energy efficient scheduling with energy harvesting for wireless multimedia sensor networks,” in 2017 International Multi-topic Conference (INMIC) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5

  10. [18]

    Cooperative communication techniques in wireless-powered backscatter communication: Preambles and technical perspective,

    M. A. Jamshed, H. Pervaiz, S. H. Ahmed, and A. S. Alam, “Cooperative communication techniques in wireless-powered backscatter communication: Preambles and technical perspective,” Wireless-powered backscatter communications for internet of things , pp. 1–24, 2021

  11. [19]

    Antenna selection and designing for THz applications: Suitability and performance evaluation: A survey,

    M. A. Jamshed, A. Nauman, M. A. B. Abbasi, and S. W. Kim, “Antenna selection and designing for THz applications: Suitability and performance evaluation: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 113 246–113 261, 2020

  12. [20]

    A survey on electromagnetic risk assessment and evaluation mechanism for future wireless communication systems,

    M. A. Jamshed, F. Heliot, and T. W. Brown, “A survey on electromagnetic risk assessment and evaluation mechanism for future wireless communication systems,” IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2019

  13. [21]

    Emerging technologies for 6G non-terrestrial-networks: From academia to industrial applications,

    C. T. Nguyen, Y . M. Saputra, N. Van Huynh, T. N. Nguyen, D. T. Hoang, D. N. Nguyen, V .-Q. Pham, M. V oznak, S. Chatzinotas, and D.-H. Tran, “Emerging technologies for 6G non-terrestrial-networks: From academia to industrial applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07763 , 2024

  14. [22]

    Synergizing airborne non- terrestrial networks and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-aided 6G IoT,

    M. A. Jamshed, A. Kaushik, M. Toka, W. Shin, M. Z. Shakir, S. P. Dash, and D. Dardari, “Synergizing airborne non- terrestrial networks and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces-aided 6G IoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 46–52, 2024

  15. [23]

    Feasibility of intelligent reflecting surfaces to combine terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,

    M. A. Jamshed, Q. H. Abbasi, and M. Ur-Rehman, “Feasibility of intelligent reflecting surfaces to combine terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,” Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces (IRS) for Prospective 6G Wireless Networks , pp. 25–40, 2022

  16. [24]

    Guest editorial: Technical advancements in NTN-assisted internet-of-things: Global connectivity from the sky,

    M. A. Jamshed, A. Kaushik, A. G. Armada, M. Di Renzo, D. Lee, R. Senanayake, and O. A. Dobre, “Guest editorial: Technical advancements in NTN-assisted internet-of-things: Global connectivity from the sky,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 10–11, 2024. 70

  17. [25]

    Energy-aware resource optimization for improved URLLC in multi-hop integrated aerial terrestrial networks,

    M. Awais, H. Pervaiz, M. A. Jamshed, W. Yu, and Q. Ni, “Energy-aware resource optimization for improved URLLC in multi-hop integrated aerial terrestrial networks,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking , 2023

  18. [26]

    Green UA V-enabled internet-of-things network with ai-assisted noma for disaster management,

    M. A. Jamshed, F. Ayaz, A. Kaushik, C. Fischione, and M. Ur-Rehman, “Green UA V-enabled internet-of-things network with ai-assisted noma for disaster management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13802 , 2023

  19. [27]

    Enhancing URLLC in integrated aerial terrestrial networks: Design insights and performance trade-offs,

    M. Awais, H. Pervaiz, M. A. Jamshed, W. Yu, and Q. Ni, “Enhancing URLLC in integrated aerial terrestrial networks: Design insights and performance trade-offs,” in 2022 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) . IEEE, 202...

  20. [28]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for GEO-LEO coexisting satellite systems: A traffic-aware throughput maximization precoder design,

    J. Ryu, A. Kaushik, B. Lee, and W. Shin, “Rate-splitting multiple access for GEO-LEO coexisting satellite systems: A traffic-aware throughput maximization precoder design,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

  21. [29]

    Reinforcement learning-enabled intelligent device- to-device (I-D2D) communication in narrowband internet of things (NB-IoT),

    A. Nauman, M. A. Jamshed, R. Ali, K. Cengiz, S. W. Kim et al. , “Reinforcement learning-enabled intelligent device- to-device (I-D2D) communication in narrowband internet of things (NB-IoT),” Computer Communications, vol. 176, pp. 13–22, 2021

  22. [30]

    An intelligent deterministic D2D communication in narrow-band internet of things,

    A. Nauman, M. A. Jamshed, Y . Ahmad, R. Ali, Y . B. Zikria, and S. W. Kim, “An intelligent deterministic D2D communication in narrow-band internet of things,” in 2019 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 2111–2115

  23. [31]

    Federated learning-based intrusion detection framework for internet of things and edge computing backed critical infrastructure,

    R. Meng, A. A. Shah, M. A. Jamshed, and D. Pezaros, “Federated learning-based intrusion detection framework for internet of things and edge computing backed critical infrastructure,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, 2024,...

  24. [32]

    Reinforcement learning-based allocation of fog nodes for cloud-based smart grid,

    M. A. Jamshed, M. Ismail, H. Pervaiz, R. Atat, I. S. Bayram, and Q. Ni, “Reinforcement learning-based allocation of fog nodes for cloud-based smart grid,” e-Prime-Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy , vol. 4, p. 100144, 2023

  25. [33]

    Advancing IIoT with over-the-air federated learning: The role of iterative magnitude pruning,

    F. M. A. Khan, H. Abou-Zeid, A. Kaushik, and S. A. Hassan, “Advancing IIoT with over-the-air federated learning: The role of iterative magnitude pruning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14120 , 2024

  26. [34]

    Quantum-enhanced DRL optimization for DoA estimation and task offloading in isac systems,

    A. Paul, K. Singh, A. Kaushik, C.-P. Li, O. A. Dobre, M. D. Renzo, and T. Q. Duong, “Quantum-enhanced DRL optimization for DoA estimation and task offloading in isac systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2024

  27. [35]

    Performance enhancement in P300 ERP single trial by machine learning adaptive denoising mechanism,

    S. K. Haider, A. Jiang, M. A. Jamshed, H. Pervaiz, and S. Mumtaz, “Performance enhancement in P300 ERP single trial by machine learning adaptive denoising mechanism,” IEEE Networking Letters , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–29, 2018

  28. [36]

    Collaborative task offloading optimization for satellite mobile edge computing using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhao, R. Liu, A. Kaushik, X. Gao, and S. Xu, “Collaborative task offloading optimization for satellite mobile edge computing using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , 2024. 71

  29. [37]

    Timely data collection for UA V-based IOT networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach,

    Y . Hu, Y . Liu, A. Kaushik, C. Masouros, and J. S. Thompson, “Timely data collection for UA V-based IOT networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 12 295–12 308, 2023

  30. [38]

    Dynamic resource allocation for virtual network function placement in satellite edge clouds,

    X. Gao, R. Liu, A. Kaushik, and H. Zhang, “Dynamic resource allocation for virtual network function placement in satellite edge clouds,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2252–2265, 2022

  31. [39]

    Virtual network function placement in satellite edge computing with a potential game approach,

    X. Gao, R. Liu, and A. Kaushik, “Virtual network function placement in satellite edge computing with a potential game approach,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1243–1259, 2022

  32. [40]

    Service chaining placement based on satellite mission planning in ground station networks,

    ——, “Service chaining placement based on satellite mission planning in ground station networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 3049–3063, 2020

  33. [41]

    Traffic-aware throughput maximization for coexistence of LEO and GEO satellite systems,

    J. Ryu, A. Kaushik, B. Lee, and W. Shin, “Traffic-aware throughput maximization for coexistence of LEO and GEO satellite systems,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops , 2024, pp. 123–128

  34. [42]

    An energy efficient approach for service chaining placement in satellite ground station networks,

    X. Gao, R. Liu, and A. Kaushik, “An energy efficient approach for service chaining placement in satellite ground station networks,” in 2021 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 217–222

  35. [43]

    Artificial Intelligence in 3GPP 5G-Advanced: A Survey,

    X. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in 3GPP 5G-Advanced: A Survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05092 , Sept. 2023

  36. [44]

    Multi-connectivity in 5G and beyond non-terrestrial networks,

    M. Majamaa, H. Martikainen, L. Sormunen, and J. Puttonen, “Multi-connectivity in 5G and beyond non-terrestrial networks,” Journal of Communications Software and Systems , vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 350–358, 2022

  37. [45]

    Connectivity analysis of UA V-to-satellite communications in non-terrestrial networks,

    Y . Liu, H.-N. Dai, and N. Zhang, “Connectivity analysis of UA V-to-satellite communications in non-terrestrial networks,” in 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

  38. [46]

    Slice-aware user association and resource allocation in integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,

    D. J. Birabwa, D. Ramotsoela, and N. Ventura, “Slice-aware user association and resource allocation in integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,” in Proc. Southern Afr. Telecommun. Netw. Appl. Conf.(SATNAC) , 2021, pp. 44–49

  39. [47]

    AI based service management for 6G green communications,

    B. Mao, F. Tang, K. Yuichi, and N. Kato, “AI based service management for 6G green communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.01588, 2021

  40. [48]

    Emerging advancements in 6G NTN radio access technologies: An overview,

    H. Shahid, C. Amatetti, R. Campana, S. Tong, D. Panaitopol, A. Vanelli-Coralli, A. Mohamed, C. Zhang, E. Khalifa, E. Medeiros et al., “Emerging advancements in 6G NTN radio access technologies: An overview,” in 2024 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G...

  41. [49]

    Key issues in wireless transmission for NTN-assisted internet of things,

    C. Qi, J. Wang, L. Lyu, L. Tan, J. Zhang, and G. Y . Li, “Key issues in wireless transmission for NTN-assisted internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2024

  42. [50]

    Service-aware user association and resource allocation in integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: A genetic algorithm approach,

    D. J. Birabwa, D. Ramotsoela, and N. Ventura, “Service-aware user association and resource allocation in integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: A genetic algorithm approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 104 337–104 357, 2022

  43. [51]

    A routing method with link information-based rule selection in non-terrestrial networks,

    T. Korikawa, C. Takasaki, K. Hattori, and H. Oowada, “A routing method with link information-based rule selection in non-terrestrial networks,” in 2024 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 850–855. 72

  44. [52]

    Radio link failure prediction in 5G networks,

    K. Boutiba, M. Bagaa, and A. Ksentini, “Radio link failure prediction in 5G networks,” in 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

  45. [53]

    Advanced constellation emulation and synthetic datasets generation for non-terrestrial networks,

    C. Rojas, J. A. Fraire, F. Patrone, and M. Marchese, “Advanced constellation emulation and synthetic datasets generation for non-terrestrial networks,” in 2024 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom). IEEE, 2024, pp. 37–43

  46. [54]

    NS3-AI: Fostering artificial intelligence algorithms for networking research,

    H. Yin, P. Liu, K. Liu, L. Cao, L. Zhang, Y . Gao, and X. Hei, “NS3-AI: Fostering artificial intelligence algorithms for networking research,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on ns-3 , 2020, pp. 57–64

  47. [55]

    Tips and tools to automate OMNET++ simulations and to facilitate post data management tasks,

    L. L. C ´ardenas, J. P. A. Le ´on, P. Bautista, and M. A. Igartua, “Tips and tools to automate OMNET++ simulations and to facilitate post data management tasks,” UPCommons, Barcelona, Spain, Tech. Rep , 2020

  48. [56]

    Matdl: A lightweight deep learning library in MATLAB,

    H. M. Fayek, “Matdl: A lightweight deep learning library in MATLAB,” The Journal of Open Source Software , vol. 2, p. 413, NOV 2017. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00413

  49. [57]

    The tensorflow machine learning library,

    N. Silaparasetty, “The tensorflow machine learning library,” Machine Learning Concepts with Python and the Jupyter Notebook Environment , vol. Not available, pp. 149–171, undefined 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5967-2 8

  50. [58]

    Python for numerical computations,

    P. M. Nugues, “Python for numerical computations,” Cognitive Technologies,Python for Natural Language Processing , vol. Not available, pp. 111–140, undefined 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57549-5 5

  51. [59]

    Introduction to scikit-learn,

    D. Paper, “Introduction to scikit-learn,” Hands-on Scikit-Learn for Machine Learning Applications , vol. Not available, pp. 1–35, NOV 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5373-1 1

  52. [60]

    Robust framework for scalable AI inference using distributed cloud services and event-driven architecture,

    Y . Jani and A. Jani, “Robust framework for scalable AI inference using distributed cloud services and event-driven architecture,” Not available , vol. Not available, p. Not available, SEP 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4909036/v1

  53. [61]

    Custom openAI reinforcement learning environments,

    T. B. II, “Custom openAI reinforcement learning environments,” Applied Reinforcement Learning with Python , vol. Not available, pp. 95–112, undefined 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5127-0 5

  54. [62]

    Data visualisation,

    M. Aitkin, “Data visualisation,” Introduction to Statistical Modelling and Inference , vol. Not available, pp. 111–116, AUG 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003216025-9

  55. [63]

    Intelligent channel prediction and power adaptation in LEO constellation for 6G,

    H. Zhang, W. Song, X. Liu, M. Sheng, W. Li, K. Long, and O. A. Dobre, “Intelligent channel prediction and power adaptation in LEO constellation for 6G,” IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 110–117, 2023

  56. [64]

    Multi-agent DRL for resource allocation and cache design in terrestrial-satellite networks,

    X. Li, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, N. Wang, K. Long, S. Al-Rubaye, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Multi-agent DRL for resource allocation and cache design in terrestrial-satellite networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5031–5042, 2022

  57. [65]

    A federated reinforcement learning approach 73 for optimizing wireless communication in UA V-enabled IoT network with dense deployments,

    F. Yang, Z. Zhao, J. Huang, P. Liu, A. Tolba, K. Yu, and M. Guizani, “A federated reinforcement learning approach 73 for optimizing wireless communication in UA V-enabled IoT network with dense deployments,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

  58. [66]

    The role of 6G technologies in advancing smart city applications: Opportunities and challenges,

    S. Sharma, R. Popli, S. Singh, G. Chhabra, G. S. Saini, M. Singh, A. Sandhu, A. Sharma, and R. Kumar, “The role of 6G technologies in advancing smart city applications: Opportunities and challenges,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 16, p. 7039, 2024

  59. [67]

    NOMA-based hybrid satellite-UA V-terrestrial networks for 6G maritime coverage,

    X. Fang, W. Feng, Y . Wang, Y . Chen, N. Ge, Z. Ding, and H. Zhu, “NOMA-based hybrid satellite-UA V-terrestrial networks for 6G maritime coverage,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 138–152, 2022

  60. [68]

    Cooperative multi-UA V positioning for aerial internet service management: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach,

    J. Kim, S. Park, S. Jung, and C. Cordeiro, “Cooperative multi-UA V positioning for aerial internet service management: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , 2024

  61. [69]

    Training embedding quantum kernels with data re-uploading quantum neural networks,

    P. Rodriguez-Grasa, Y . Ban, and M. Sanz, “Training embedding quantum kernels with data re-uploading quantum neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04642 , 2024

  62. [70]

    Resource allocation in cognitive radio-enabled UA V communication,

    S. K. Nobar, M. H. Ahmed, Y . Morgan, and S. A. Mahmoud, “Resource allocation in cognitive radio-enabled UA V communication,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking , vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 296–310, 2021

  63. [71]

    Survey on unmanned aerial vehicle networks for civil applications: A communications viewpoint,

    S. Hayat, E. Yanmaz, and R. Muzaffar, “Survey on unmanned aerial vehicle networks for civil applications: A communications viewpoint,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2624–2661, 2016

  64. [72]

    UA V communications for 5G and beyond: Recent advances and future trends,

    B. Li, Z. Fei, and Y . Zhang, “UA V communications for 5G and beyond: Recent advances and future trends,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2241–2263, 2018

  65. [73]

    Leveraging mobility and content caching for proactive load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks,

    S. Manzoor, S. Mazhar, A. Asghar, A. Noor Mian, A. Imran, and J. Crowcroft, “Leveraging mobility and content caching for proactive load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 31, no. 2, p. e3739, 2020

  66. [74]

    AoI-sensitive data collection in multi-UA V-assisted wireless sensor networks,

    X. Gao, X. Zhu, and L. Zhai, “AoI-sensitive data collection in multi-UA V-assisted wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2023

  67. [75]

    Delay optimal UA V trajectory planning for secure data collection from mobile IoT networks,

    A. Chapnevis and E. Bulut, “Delay optimal UA V trajectory planning for secure data collection from mobile IoT networks,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4

  68. [76]

    Machine learning techniques for UA V trajectory optimization—A survey,

    S. Rajendran, K. K. Samy, J. Chinnathevar, and D. P. Sethuraj, “Machine learning techniques for UA V trajectory optimization—A survey,” in Computational Intelligence for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Communication Networks . Springer, 2022, pp. 35–44

  69. [77]

    Non-terrestrial networks with UA Vs: A projection on flying ad-hoc networks,

    M. Nemati, B. Al Homssi, S. Krishnan, J. Park, S. W. Loke, and J. Choi, “Non-terrestrial networks with UA Vs: A projection on flying ad-hoc networks,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 11, p. 334, 2022

  70. [78]

    Generalized path planning for collaborative UA Vs using reinforcement and imitation learning,

    J. Farley, A. Chapnevis, and E. Bulut, “Generalized path planning for collaborative UA Vs using reinforcement and imitation learning,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, 74 and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and...

  71. [79]

    Optimal UA V caching and trajectory in aerial-assisted vehicular networks: A learning-based approach,

    H. Wu, F. Lyu, C. Zhou, J. Chen, L. Wang, and X. Shen, “Optimal UA V caching and trajectory in aerial-assisted vehicular networks: A learning-based approach,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2783–2797, 2020

  72. [80]

    Multi-UA V path planning for wireless data harvesting with deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Bayerlein, M. Theile, M. Caccamo, and D. Gesbert, “Multi-UA V path planning for wireless data harvesting with deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 2, pp. 1171–1187, 2021

  73. [81]

    Reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance and optimal trajectory planning in UA V communication networks,

    Y .-H. Hsu and R.-H. Gau, “Reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance and optimal trajectory planning in UA V communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 306–320, 2020

  74. [82]

    DRL-UTPS: DRL-based trajectory planning for unmanned aerial vehicles for data collection in dynamic IoT network,

    R. Liu, Z. Qu, G. Huang, M. Dong, T. Wang, S. Zhang, and A. Liu, “DRL-UTPS: DRL-based trajectory planning for unmanned aerial vehicles for data collection in dynamic IoT network,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1204–1218, 2022

  75. [83]

    Path planning for the dynamic UA V-aided wireless systems using monte carlo tree search,

    Y . Qian, K. Sheng, C. Ma, J. Li, M. Ding, and M. Hassan, “Path planning for the dynamic UA V-aided wireless systems using monte carlo tree search,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 6716–6721, 2022

  76. [84]

    Path planning for fixed- wing UA Vs based on expert knowledge and improved VFH in cluttered environments,

    H. Zhang, Y . Zhang, C. Guo, T. Wang, L. Fan, J. Hu, Z. Xu, Z. Dou, K. Zhang, and J. Liang, “Path planning for fixed- wing UA Vs based on expert knowledge and improved VFH in cluttered environments,” in 2022 IEEE 17th International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA) . I...

  77. [85]

    Q-learning based path planning method for UA Vs using priority shifting,

    K. B. de Carvalho, I. R. L. de Oliveira, D. K. Villa, A. G. Caldeira, M. Sarcinelli-Filho, and A. S. Brand ˜ao, “Q-learning based path planning method for UA Vs using priority shifting,” in 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 421–426

  78. [86]

    Deep reinforcement learning for trajectory path planning and distributed inference in resource-constrained UA V swarms,

    M. Dhuheir, E. Baccour, A. Erbad, S. S. Al-Obaidi, and M. Hamdi, “Deep reinforcement learning for trajectory path planning and distributed inference in resource-constrained UA V swarms,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2022

  79. [87]

    Autonomous navigation of UA V in multi-obstacle environments based on a deep reinforcement learning approach,

    S. Zhang, Y . Li, and Q. Dong, “Autonomous navigation of UA V in multi-obstacle environments based on a deep reinforcement learning approach,” Applied Soft Computing , vol. 115, p. 108194, 2022

  80. [88]

    A vision based deep reinforcement learning algorithm for UA V obstacle avoidance,

    J. Roghair, A. Niaraki, K. Ko, and A. Jannesari, “A vision based deep reinforcement learning algorithm for UA V obstacle avoidance,” in Intelligent Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 2021 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) Volume 1. Springer, 2022, pp. 115–128

  81. [89]

    A bionic dynamic path planning algorithm of the micro UA V based on the fusion of deep neural network optimization/filtering and hawk-eye vision,

    Z. Zhang, S. Wang, J. Chen, and Y . Han, “A bionic dynamic path planning algorithm of the micro UA V based on the fusion of deep neural network optimization/filtering and hawk-eye vision,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2023

  82. [90]

    A real-time dynamic obstacle tracking and mapping system for UA V navigation and collision avoidance with an RGB-D camera,

    Z. Xu, X. Zhan, B. Chen, Y . Xiu, C. Yang, and K. Shimada, “A real-time dynamic obstacle tracking and mapping system for UA V navigation and collision avoidance with an RGB-D camera,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics 75 and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1...

  83. [91]

    Multi-UA V trajectory optimizer: A sustainable system for wireless data harvesting with deep reinforcement learning,

    M. Seong, O. Jo, and K. Shin, “Multi-UA V trajectory optimizer: A sustainable system for wireless data harvesting with deep reinforcement learning,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , vol. 120, p. 105891, 2023

  84. [92]

    Goal distance-based UA V path planning approach, path optimization and learning-based path estimation: GDRRT ∗, PSO-GDRRT ∗ and BiLSTM-PSO-GDRRT ∗,

    M. F. Aslan, A. Durdu, and K. Sabanci, “Goal distance-based UA V path planning approach, path optimization and learning-based path estimation: GDRRT ∗, PSO-GDRRT ∗ and BiLSTM-PSO-GDRRT ∗,” Applied Soft Computing , vol. 137, p. 110156, 2023

  85. [93]

    UA V placement and bandwidth allocation for UA V based wireless networks,

    M. D. Nguyen, T. M. Ho, L. B. Le, and A. Girard, “UA V placement and bandwidth allocation for UA V based wireless networks,” in 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

  86. [94]

    Energy efficiency analysis of drone small cells positioning based on reinforcement learning,

    A. F. dos Reis, G. Brante, R. Parisotto, R. D. Souza, P. H. Klaine, J. P. Battistella, and M. A. Imran, “Energy efficiency analysis of drone small cells positioning based on reinforcement learning,” Internet Technology Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, p. e166, 2020

  87. [95]

    Three-dimensional multi- UA V placement and resource allocation for energy-efficient IoT communication,

    N. Nouri, J. Abouei, A. R. Sepasian, M. Jaseemuddin, A. Anpalagan, and K. N. Plataniotis, “Three-dimensional multi- UA V placement and resource allocation for energy-efficient IoT communication,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2134–2152, 2021

  88. [96]

    Efficient 3D placement of a UA V using particle swarm optimization,

    H. Shakhatreh, A. Khreishah, A. Alsarhan, I. Khalil, A. Sawalmeh, and N. S. Othman, “Efficient 3D placement of a UA V using particle swarm optimization,” in 2017 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 258–263

  89. [97]

    Joint optimization of UA V 3-D placement and path-loss factor for energy-efficient maximal coverage,

    S. Shakoor, Z. Kaleem, D.-T. Do, O. A. Dobre, and A. Jamalipour, “Joint optimization of UA V 3-D placement and path-loss factor for energy-efficient maximal coverage,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 9776–9786, 2020

  90. [98]

    3-D placement of an unmanned aerial vehicle base station (UA V-bs) for energy-efficient maximal coverage,

    M. Alzenad, A. El-Keyi, F. Lagum, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “3-D placement of an unmanned aerial vehicle base station (UA V-bs) for energy-efficient maximal coverage,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 434–437, 2017

  91. [99]

    Joint altitude, power control, and bandwidth allocation optimization for unmanned aerial vehicle-enabled reliable communications,

    L. Wang, B. Hu, F. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Cui, “Joint altitude, power control, and bandwidth allocation optimization for unmanned aerial vehicle-enabled reliable communications,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 31, no. 7, p. e3983, 2020

  92. [100]

    Resource management in 5G networks assisted by UA V base stations: Machine learning for overloaded macrocell prediction based on users’ temporal and spatial flow,

    R. D. Alfaia, A. V . d. F. Souto, E. H. S. Cardoso, J. P. L. d. Ara ´ujo, and C. R. L. Franc ˆes, “Resource management in 5G networks assisted by UA V base stations: Machine learning for overloaded macrocell prediction based on users’ temporal and spatial flow,” Drones, vol. 6...

  93. [101]

    Deep learning for optimal deployment of UA Vs with visible light communications,

    Y . Wang, M. Chen, Z. Yang, T. Luo, and W. Saad, “Deep learning for optimal deployment of UA Vs with visible light communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 7049–7063, 2020. 76

  94. [102]

    Learning in the sky: Towards efficient 3D placement of UA Vs,

    A. H. Arani, M. M. Azari, W. Melek, and S. Safavi-Naeini, “Learning in the sky: Towards efficient 3D placement of UA Vs,” in2020 IEEE 31st Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–7

  95. [103]

    Learning to deployment: Data-driven on-demand UA V placement for throughput maximization,

    L. Wang, H. Zhang, S. Guo, D. Li, and D. Yuan, “Learning to deployment: Data-driven on-demand UA V placement for throughput maximization,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

  96. [104]

    3D UA V placement and user association in software-defined cellular networks,

    C. Pan, C. Yin, N. C. Beaulieu, and J. Yu, “3D UA V placement and user association in software-defined cellular networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 3883–3897, 2019

  97. [105]

    Mobility-aware federated learning-based proactive UA Vs placement in emerging cellular networks,

    S. Manzoor, M. Hasna, and M. Z. Shakir, “Mobility-aware federated learning-based proactive UA Vs placement in emerging cellular networks,” Authorea Preprints, 2024

  98. [106]

    UA V-assisted vehicular edge computing for the 6G internet of vehicles: Architecture, intelligence, and challenges,

    J. Hu, C. Chen, L. Cai, M. R. Khosravi, Q. Pei, and S. Wan, “UA V-assisted vehicular edge computing for the 6G internet of vehicles: Architecture, intelligence, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2021

  99. [107]

    Effective 3C resource utilization and fair allocation strategy for multi-task federated learning,

    C. Zhang, M. Dong, and K. Ota, “Effective 3C resource utilization and fair allocation strategy for multi-task federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking , vol. 1, pp. 153–167, 2023

  100. [108]

    Lightweight single-layer aggregation framework for energy-efficient and privacy- preserving load forecasting in heterogeneous smart grids,

    H. U. Manzoor, A. Jafri, and A. Zoha, “Lightweight single-layer aggregation framework for energy-efficient and privacy- preserving load forecasting in heterogeneous smart grids,” 2024

  101. [109]

    Communication-efficient federated learning for resource-constrained edge devices,

    G. Lan, X.-Y . Liu, Y . Zhang, and X. Wang, “Communication-efficient federated learning for resource-constrained edge devices,” IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking , vol. 1, pp. 210–224, 2023

  102. [110]

    Federated learning empowered mobility-aware proactive content offloading framework for fog radio access networks,

    S. Manzoor, A. N. Mian, A. Zoha, and M. A. Imran, “Federated learning empowered mobility-aware proactive content offloading framework for fog radio access networks,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 133, pp. 307–319, 2022

  103. [111]

    Fedbranched: Leveraging federated learning for anomaly-aware load forecasting in energy networks,

    H. U. Manzoor, A. R. Khan, D. Flynn, M. M. Alam, M. Akram, M. A. Imran, and A. Zoha, “Fedbranched: Leveraging federated learning for anomaly-aware load forecasting in energy networks,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3570, 2023

  104. [112]

    A value-added IoT service for cellular networks using federated learning,

    A. N. Mian, S. W. H. Shah, S. Manzoor, A. Said, K. Heimerl, and J. Crowcroft, “A value-added IoT service for cellular networks using federated learning,” Computer Networks, vol. 213, p. 109094, 2022

  105. [113]

    Wireless backhaul in 5G and beyond: Issues, challenges and opportunities,

    B. Tezergil and E. Onur, “Wireless backhaul in 5G and beyond: Issues, challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Communi- cations Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2579–2632, 2022

  106. [114]

    A satellite networking approach supporting batch ephemeris update,

    X. Huang and X. Xia, “A satellite networking approach supporting batch ephemeris update,” in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–5

  107. [115]

    Unmanned autonomous intelligent system in 6G non-terrestrial network,

    X. Wang, Y . Guo, and Y . Gao, “Unmanned autonomous intelligent system in 6G non-terrestrial network,” Information, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 38, 2024

  108. [116]

    A tutorial on UA Vs for wireless networks: Applications, 77 challenges, and open problems,

    M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y .-H. Nam, and M. Debbah, “A tutorial on UA Vs for wireless networks: Applications, 77 challenges, and open problems,” IEEE communications surveys & tutorials , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2334–2360, 2019

  109. [117]

    HAPS for 6G networks: Potential use cases, open challenges, and possible solutions,

    O. Abbasi, A. Yadav, H. Yanikomeroglu, N.-D. Dao, G. Senarath, and P. Zhu, “HAPS for 6G networks: Potential use cases, open challenges, and possible solutions,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 324–331, 2024

  110. [118]

    Robust trajectory and communication design for multi-UA V enabled wireless networks in the presence of jammers,

    Y . Wu, W. Fan, W. Yang, X. Sun, and X. Guan, “Robust trajectory and communication design for multi-UA V enabled wireless networks in the presence of jammers,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 2893–2905, 2019

  111. [119]

    A blockchain-enabled energy-efficient data collection system for UA V-assisted IoT,

    X. Xu, H. Zhao, H. Yao, and S. Wang, “A blockchain-enabled energy-efficient data collection system for UA V-assisted IoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2431–2443, 2020

  112. [120]

    A fast deployment strategy for UA V enabled network based on deep learning,

    J. Liu, Q. Wang, X. Li, and W. Zhang, “A fast deployment strategy for UA V enabled network based on deep learning,” in 2020 IEEE 31st Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

  113. [121]

    Energy management and trajectory optimization for UA V-enabled legitimate monitoring systems,

    S. Hu, Q. Wu, and X. Wang, “Energy management and trajectory optimization for UA V-enabled legitimate monitoring systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 142–155, 2020

  114. [122]

    Swarm of UA Vs for network management in 6G: A technical review,

    M. A. Khan, N. Kumar, S. A. H. Mohsan, W. U. Khan, M. M. Nasralla, M. H. Alsharif, J. ˙Zywiołek, and I. Ullah, “Swarm of UA Vs for network management in 6G: A technical review,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 741–761, 2022

  115. [123]

    Signal processing for high-throughput satellites: Challenges in new interference-limited scenarios,

    A. I. Perez-Neira, M. A. Vazquez, M. B. Shankar, S. Maleki, and S. Chatzinotas, “Signal processing for high-throughput satellites: Challenges in new interference-limited scenarios,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 112– 131, 2019

  116. [124]

    Non-orthogonal multiple access in multi-cell networks: Theory, performance, and practical challenges,

    W. Shin, M. Vaezi, B. Lee, D. J. Love, J. Lee, and H. V . Poor, “Non-orthogonal multiple access in multi-cell networks: Theory, performance, and practical challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 176–183, 2017

  117. [125]

    Unsupervised learning based emission-aware uplink resource allocation scheme for non-orthogonal multiple access systems,

    M. A. Jamshed, F. Heliot, and T. W. Brown, “Unsupervised learning based emission-aware uplink resource allocation scheme for non-orthogonal multiple access systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 7681–7691, 2021

  118. [126]

    Performance analysis of NOMA multicast systems based on rateless codes with delay constraints,

    Y . Hu, R. Liu, A. Kaushik, and J. Thompson, “Performance analysis of NOMA multicast systems based on rateless codes with delay constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 5003–5017, 2021

  119. [127]

    Emission-aware resource optimization framework for backscatter-enabled uplink NOMA networks,

    M. A. Jamshed, W. U. Khan, H. Pervaiz, M. A. Imran, and M. Ur-Rehman, “Emission-aware resource optimization framework for backscatter-enabled uplink NOMA networks,” in Proc. 2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2022, pp. 1–5

  120. [128]

    Electromagnetic field exposure-aware AI framework for integrated sensing and communications-enabled ambient backscatter wireless networks,

    M. A. Jamshed, Y . A. Qadri, A. Nauman, and H. Jung, “Electromagnetic field exposure-aware AI framework for integrated sensing and communications-enabled ambient backscatter wireless networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

  121. [129]

    Energy efficiency optimization for 78 backscatter enhanced NOMA cooperative V2X communications under imperfect CSI,

    W. U. Khan, M. A. Jamshed, E. Lagunas, S. Chatzinotas, X. Li, and B. Ottersten, “Energy efficiency optimization for 78 backscatter enhanced NOMA cooperative V2X communications under imperfect CSI,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1...

  122. [130]

    RIS-empowered LEO satellite networks for 6G: Promising usage scenarios and future directions,

    M. Toka, B. Lee, J. Seong, A. Kaushik, J. Lee, J. Lee, N. Lee, W. Shin, and H. V . Poor, “RIS-empowered LEO satellite networks for 6G: Promising usage scenarios and future directions,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 128–135, 2024

  123. [131]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for 6G networks: Ten promising scenarios and applications,

    J. Park, B. Lee, J. Choi, H. Lee, N. Lee, S.-H. Park, K.-J. Lee, J. Choi, S. H. Chae, S.-W. Jeon, K. S. Kwak, B. Clerckx, and W. Shin, “Rate-splitting multiple access for 6G networks: Ten promising scenarios and applications,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 128–136, 2024

  124. [132]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink communication systems: Bridging, generalizing, and outperforming SDMA and NOMA,

    Y . Mao, B. Clerckx, and V . O. Li, “Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink communication systems: Bridging, generalizing, and outperforming SDMA and NOMA,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking , vol. 2018, no. 1, pp. 1–54, 2018

  125. [133]

    Multiple access schemes for 6G enabled NTN-assisted IoT technologies: Recent developments, prospects and challenges,

    A. S. Shah, M. A. Karabulut, and K. Rabie, “Multiple access schemes for 6G enabled NTN-assisted IoT technologies: Recent developments, prospects and challenges,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2024

  126. [134]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for multigroup multicast and multibeam satellite systems,

    L. Yin and B. Clerckx, “Rate-splitting multiple access for multigroup multicast and multibeam satellite systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 976–990, 2020

  127. [135]

    Energy efficiency of rate-splitting multiple access for multibeam satellite communications,

    J. Liu, Y . L. Guan, Y . Ge, L. Yin, and B. Clerckx, “Energy efficiency of rate-splitting multiple access for multibeam satellite communications,” in Proc. 2023 IEEE 97th Vehicular Technology Conference , 2023, pp. 1–5

  128. [136]

    Energy-efficient RSMA for multigroup multicast and multibeam satellite communications,

    H. Cui, L. Zhu, Z. Xiao, B. Clerckx, and R. Zhang, “Energy-efficient RSMA for multigroup multicast and multibeam satellite communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 838–842, 2023

  129. [137]

    Robust rate-matching framework for multibeam satellite communications with phase perturbations,

    J. Seong, J. Park, J. Lee, J. Lee, W. Shin, and H. V . Poor, “Robust rate-matching framework for multibeam satellite communications with phase perturbations,” in Proc. 2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops , 2023, pp. 280–285

  130. [138]

    Non-orthogonal broadcast and unicast joint transmission for multibeam satellite system,

    Z. Li, S. Wang, S. Han, and C. Li, “Non-orthogonal broadcast and unicast joint transmission for multibeam satellite system,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting , vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 647–660, 2023

  131. [139]

    Rate-splitting for joint unicast and multicast transmission in LEO satellite networks with non-uniform traffic demand,

    J. Seong, J. Park, D.-H. Jung, J. Park, and W. Shin, “Rate-splitting for joint unicast and multicast transmission in LEO satellite networks with non-uniform traffic demand,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , 2024

  132. [140]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for satellite-terrestrial integrated networks: Benefits of coordination and cooperation,

    L. Yin and B. Clerckx, “Rate-splitting multiple access for satellite-terrestrial integrated networks: Benefits of coordination and cooperation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 317–332, 2023

  133. [141]

    Coordinated rate-splitting multiple access for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks with super-common message,

    J. Lee, J. Lee, L. Yin, W. Shin, and B. Clerckx, “Coordinated rate-splitting multiple access for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks with super-common message,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 2989–2994, 2024

  134. [142]

    Rate splitting multiple access for next generation cognitive radio enabled LEO satellite networks,

    W. U. Khan, Z. Ali, E. Lagunas, A. Mahmood, M. Asif, A. Ihsan, S. Chatzinotas, B. Ottersten, and O. A. Dobre, “Rate splitting multiple access for next generation cognitive radio enabled LEO satellite networks,” IEEE Transactions 79 on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 11, ...

  135. [143]

    Distributed rate-splitting multiple access for multilayer satellite communications,

    Y . Xu, L. Yin, Y . Mao, W. Shin, and B. Clerckx, “Distributed rate-splitting multiple access for multilayer satellite communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6131–6144, 2024

  136. [144]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: Emerging hardware architectures, applications, and open challenges,

    E. Basar, G. C. Alexandropoulos, Y . Liu, Q. Wu, S. Jin, C. Yuen, O. A. Dobre, and R. Schober, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: Emerging hardware architectures, applications, and open challenges,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. Early Access, pp. 2–22, 2024

  137. [145]

    A 1600-element dual-frequency electronically reconfigurable reflectarray at X/Ku-band,

    H. Yang, F. Yang, X. Cao, S. Xu, J. Gao, X. Chen, M. Li, and T. Li, “A 1600-element dual-frequency electronically reconfigurable reflectarray at X/Ku-band,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 3024–3032, 2017

  138. [146]

    Active RIS vs. passive RIS: Which will prevail in 6G?

    Z. Zhang, L. Dai, X. Chen, C. Liu, F. Yang, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “Active RIS vs. passive RIS: Which will prevail in 6G?” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1707–1725, 2023

  139. [147]

    STAR: Simultaneous transmission and reflection for 360° coverage by intelligent surfaces,

    Y . Liu, X. Mu, J. Xu, R. Schober, Y . Hao, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “STAR: Simultaneous transmission and reflection for 360° coverage by intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 102–109, 2021

  140. [148]

    A programmable diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array,

    C. Liu et al. , “A programmable diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array,” Natural Electronics, vol. 5, p. 113–122, 2022

  141. [149]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,

    J. An, C. Xu, D. W. K. Ng, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Huang, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2380–2396, 2023

  142. [150]

    A new wireless communication paradigm through software-controlled metasurfaces,

    C. Liaskos, S. Nie, A. Tsioliaridou, A. Pitsillides, S. Ioannidis, and I. Akyildiz, “A new wireless communication paradigm through software-controlled metasurfaces,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 162–169, 2018

  143. [151]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, 2020

  144. [152]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for future wireless networks: A channel modeling perspective,

    E. Basar and I. Yildirim, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for future wireless networks: A channel modeling perspective,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 108–114, 2021

  145. [153]

    Wireless communications through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    E. Basar, M. Di Renzo, J. De Rosny, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, and R. Zhang, “Wireless communications through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 116 753–116 773, 2019

  146. [154]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. ...

  147. [155]

    Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces: A contemporary survey,

    S. Gong, X. Lu, D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, L. Shu, D. I. Kim, and Y .-C. Liang, “Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces: A contemporary survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 22, no. 4, 80 pp. 2283–2314, 2020

  148. [156]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313–3351, 2021

  149. [157]

    Aerial platforms with reconfigurable smart surfaces for 5G and beyond,

    S. Alfattani, W. Jaafar, Y . Hmamouche, H. Yanikomeroglu, A. Yongac ¸oglu, N. D. Dao, and P. Zhu, “Aerial platforms with reconfigurable smart surfaces for 5G and beyond,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2021

  150. [158]

    Enabling smart reflection in integrated air-ground wireless network: IRS meets UA V,

    C. You, Z. Kang, Y . Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Enabling smart reflection in integrated air-ground wireless network: IRS meets UA V,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 138–144, 2021

  151. [159]

    Performance analysis of RIS-assisted UA V communication systems,

    L. Yang, P. Li, F. Meng, and S. Yu, “Performance analysis of RIS-assisted UA V communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 9078–9082, 2022

  152. [160]

    Joint design of aerial reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided URLLC systems,

    X. Song, Y . Zhao, W. Zhao, H. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Joint design of aerial reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided URLLC systems,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 13 244–13 258, 2024

  153. [161]

    3D-trajectory and phase-shift design for RIS-assisted UA V systems using deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Mei, K. Yang, Q. Liu, and K. Wang, “3D-trajectory and phase-shift design for RIS-assisted UA V systems using deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 3020–3029, 2022

  154. [162]

    Opportunities for physical layer security in UA V communication enhanced with intelligent reflective surfaces,

    W. U. Khan, E. Lagunas, Z. Ali, M. A. Javed, M. Ahmed, S. Chatzinotas, B. Ottersten, and P. Popovski, “Opportunities for physical layer security in UA V communication enhanced with intelligent reflective surfaces,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 22–28, 2022

  155. [163]

    Robust secure UA V communications with the aid of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    S. Li, B. Duo, M. D. Renzo, M. Tao, and X. Yuan, “Robust secure UA V communications with the aid of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 6402–6417, 2021

  156. [164]

    RIS-assisted UA V secure communications with artificial noise-aware trajectory design against multiple colluding curious users,

    Y . Wen, G. Chen, S. Fang, M. Wen, S. Tomasin, and M. D. Renzo, “RIS-assisted UA V secure communications with artificial noise-aware trajectory design against multiple colluding curious users,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, pp. 3064–3076, 2024

  157. [165]

    Nonterrestrial communications assisted by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    J. Ye, J. Qiao, A. Kammoun, and M.-S. Alouini, “Nonterrestrial communications assisted by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1423–1465, 2022

  158. [166]

    Resource-efficient HAPS-RIS enabled beyond-cell communications,

    S. Alfattani, A. Yadav, H. Yanikomeroglu, and A. Yongac ¸oglu, “Resource-efficient HAPS-RIS enabled beyond-cell communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 679–683, 2023

  159. [167]

    RIS meets aerodynamic HAPS: A multi-objective optimization approach,

    A. Azizi and A. Farhang, “RIS meets aerodynamic HAPS: A multi-objective optimization approach,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1851–1855, 2023

  160. [168]

    On performance of integrated satellite HAPS ground communication: Aerial IRS node vs terrestrial IRS node,

    P. Shaik, K. Kishore Garg, P. Kumar Singya, V . Bhatia, O. Krejcar, and M.-S. Alouini, “On performance of integrated satellite HAPS ground communication: Aerial IRS node vs terrestrial IRS node,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 5, pp. 3775–3791, 2024. 81

  161. [169]

    Towards 6G hyper-connectivity: Vision, challenges, and key enabling technologies,

    H. Lee, B. Lee, H. Yang, J. Kim, S. Kim, W. Shin, B. Shim, and H. V . Poor, “Towards 6G hyper-connectivity: Vision, challenges, and key enabling technologies,” Journal of Communications and Networks , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 344–354, 2023

  162. [170]

    LEO/VLEO satellite communications in 6G and beyond networks – technologies, applications and challenges,

    X. Luo, H.-H. Chen, and Q. Guo, “LEO/VLEO satellite communications in 6G and beyond networks – technologies, applications and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. Early access, pp. 1–1, 2024

  163. [171]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in action for nonterrestrial networks,

    K. Tekbiyik, G. K. Kurt, A. R. Ekti, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in action for nonterrestrial networks,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 45–53, 2022

  164. [172]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces empowered THz communication in LEO satellite networks,

    ——, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces empowered THz communication in LEO satellite networks,” IEEE Access , vol. 10, pp. 121 957–121 969, 2022

  165. [173]

    Refracting RIS-aided hybrid satellite-terrestrial relay networks: Joint beamforming design and optimization,

    Z. Lin, H. Niu, K. An, Y . Wang, G. Zheng, S. Chatzinotas, and Y . Hu, “Refracting RIS-aided hybrid satellite-terrestrial relay networks: Joint beamforming design and optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 3717–3724, 2022

  166. [174]

    Performance analysis of RIS-aided multibeam satellite communication systems,

    C. Kim, W. Saad, and M. Jung, “Performance analysis of RIS-aided multibeam satellite communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. Early Access, pp. 1–11, 2024

  167. [175]

    RIS-aided integrated satellite duplex UA V relay terrestrial networks with imperfect hardware and co-channel interference,

    J. Sun, K. Guo, X. Wang, and M. Zhu, “RIS-aided integrated satellite duplex UA V relay terrestrial networks with imperfect hardware and co-channel interference,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process , vol. 109, pp. 1–20, 2023

  168. [176]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted multisatellite cooperative downlink beamforming,

    K. Feng, T. Zhou, T. Xu, X. Chen, H. Hu, and C. Wu, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted multisatellite cooperative downlink beamforming,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 23 222–23 235, 2024

  169. [177]

    STAR-RIS-enabled NOMA with signal constellation adjustment for 6G LEO satellite networks,

    J. Y . Baek, Y .-S. Lee, and B. C. Jung, “STAR-RIS-enabled NOMA with signal constellation adjustment for 6G LEO satellite networks,” in 2023 14th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2023, pp. 1653–1655

  170. [178]

    Energy efficiency design in RIS-assisted satellite–terrestrial integrated networks with NOMA,

    Z. Lv, F. Gong, G. Chen, G. Li, T. Hui, and S. Xu, “Energy efficiency design in RIS-assisted satellite–terrestrial integrated networks with NOMA,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1948–1952, 2024

  171. [179]

    RIS-assisted energy-efficient LEO satellite communications with NOMA,

    W. U. Khan, E. Lagunas, A. Mahmood, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “RIS-assisted energy-efficient LEO satellite communications with NOMA,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 780–790, 2024

  172. [180]

    Performance analysis of rate-splitting multiple access in intelligent reflecting surface-assisted uplink hybrid satellite-terrestrial networks,

    M. Can and I. Altunbas, “Performance analysis of rate-splitting multiple access in intelligent reflecting surface-assisted uplink hybrid satellite-terrestrial networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems , vol. e5917, no. n/a, pp. 1–18, 2024

  173. [181]

    Active RIS-assisted secure transmission for cognitive satellite terrestrial networks,

    H. Niu, Z. Lin, K. An, X. Liang, Y . Hu, D. Li, and G. Zheng, “Active RIS-assisted secure transmission for cognitive satellite terrestrial networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 2609–2614, 2023

  174. [182]

    RIS-assisted covert transmission in satellite–terrestrial communication 82 systems,

    D. Song, Z. Yang, G. Pan, S. Wang, and J. An, “RIS-assisted covert transmission in satellite–terrestrial communication 82 systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 19 415–19 426, 2023

  175. [183]

    Secrecy-rate optimization of double RIS-aided space–ground networks,

    T. M. Hoang, C. Xu, A. Vahid, H. D. Tuan, T. Q. Duong, and L. Hanzo, “Secrecy-rate optimization of double RIS-aided space–ground networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 13 221–13 234, 2023

  176. [184]

    OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey,

    T. Hwang, C. Yang, G. Wu, S. Li, and G. Ye Li, “OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1673–1694, 2009

  177. [185]

    NB-IoT random access for nonterrestrial networks: Preamble detection and uplink synchronization,

    H. Chougrani, S. Kisseleff, W. A. Martins, and S. Chatzinotas, “NB-IoT random access for nonterrestrial networks: Preamble detection and uplink synchronization,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 14 913–14 927, 2022

  178. [186]

    Doppler effect mitigation in LEO-based 5G non-terrestrial networks,

    A. K. Meshram, S. Kumar, J. Querol, and S. Chatzinotas, “Doppler effect mitigation in LEO-based 5G non-terrestrial networks,” in 2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) , 2023, pp. 311–316

  179. [187]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for Doppler effect and multipath fading mitigation,

    E. Basar, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for Doppler effect and multipath fading mitigation,” Frontiers in Commu- nications and Networks , vol. 2, pp. 1–12, 2021

  180. [188]

    Intelligent reflecting surface operation under predictable receiver mobility: A continuous time propagation model,

    B. Matthiesen, E. Bj ¨ornson, E. De Carvalho, and P. Popovski, “Intelligent reflecting surface operation under predictable receiver mobility: A continuous time propagation model,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2021

  181. [189]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-aided Doppler compensation for low-earth orbit satellite networks: Joint power allocation and passive beamforming optimisation,

    J. Lee, J. Lee, M. Toka, W. Shin, and J. Lee, “Intelligent reflecting surface-aided Doppler compensation for low-earth orbit satellite networks: Joint power allocation and passive beamforming optimisation,” IET Signal Processing , vol. 17, no. 4, p. e12212, 2023

  182. [190]

    On the performance of RIS-aided OFDM-based LEO satellite networks with Doppler effects,

    M. Toka, A. Kaushik, A. G. Armada, and W. Shin, “On the performance of RIS-aided OFDM-based LEO satellite networks with Doppler effects,” in Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Shanghai, China, 25–28 September 202...

  183. [191]

    NTN-aided quality and energy-aware data collection in time-critical robotic wireless sensor networks,

    O. M. Gul, A. M. Erkmen, and B. Kantarci, “NTN-aided quality and energy-aware data collection in time-critical robotic wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 114–120, 2024

  184. [192]

    Varrall, 5G and Satellite Spectrum, Standards, and Scale

    G. Varrall, 5G and Satellite Spectrum, Standards, and Scale . Artech House, 2018

  185. [193]

    Secure transmission for thz-empowered RIS-assisted non- terrestrial networks,

    J. Yuan, G. Chen, M. Wen, R. Tafazolli, and E. Panayirci, “Secure transmission for thz-empowered RIS-assisted non- terrestrial networks,” IEEE transactions on vehicular technology , vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 5989–6000, 2022

  186. [194]

    Clustering-NN based CFO estimation using random access preambles for 5G non-terrestrial networks,

    L. Zhen, L. Cheng, Z. Chu, K. Yu, P. Xiao, and M. Guizani, “Clustering-NN based CFO estimation using random access preambles for 5G non-terrestrial networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , 2023

  187. [195]

    Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future challenges,

    O. Kodheli, E. Lagunas, N. Maturo, S. K. Sharma, B. Shankar, J. F. M. Montoya, J. C. M. Duncan, D. Spano, S. Chatzinotas, S. Kisseleff et al. , “Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 23, n...

  188. [196]

    Pratt and J

    T. Pratt and J. E. Allnutt, Satellite communications. John Wiley & Sons, 2019

  189. [197]

    Resource optimization for integrated terrestrial non-terrestrial networks involving IRS,

    W. U. Khan, A. Mahmood, E. Lagunas, M. A. Jamshed, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “Resource optimization for integrated terrestrial non-terrestrial networks involving IRS,” in 2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1710–1715

  190. [198]

    ML-based PBCH symbol detection and equalization for 5G non-terrestrial networks,

    I. Larr ´ayoz-Arrigote, M. O. Mendonc ¸a, A. Gonzalez-Garrido, J. Krivochiza, S. Kumar, J. Querol, J. Grotz, and S. Chatzinotas, “ML-based PBCH symbol detection and equalization for 5G non-terrestrial networks,” in 2024 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communicat...

  191. [199]

    Multi-connectivity between terrestrial and non-terrestrial mimo systems,

    B. Shang, X. Li, Z. Li, J. Ma, X. Chu, and P. Fan, “Multi-connectivity between terrestrial and non-terrestrial mimo systems,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2024

  192. [200]

    Non-terrestrial networks in a nutshell,

    I. C. Msadaa, S. Zairi, and A. Dhraief, “Non-terrestrial networks in a nutshell,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2022

  193. [201]

    Orthogonal time frequency space modulation—part I: Fundamentals and challenges ahead,

    Z. Wei, S. Li, W. Yuan, R. Schober, and G. Caire, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation—part I: Fundamentals and challenges ahead,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 2023

  194. [202]

    OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe doppler effects,

    J. Shi, Z. Li, J. Hu, Z. Tie, S. Li, W. Liang, and Z. Ding, “OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe doppler effects,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 203–209, 2024

  195. [203]

    A survey on orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    M. Aldababsa, S. ¨Ozyurt, G. K. Kurt, and O. Kucur, “A survey on orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 5, pp. 4483–4518, 2024

  196. [204]

    Minimizing forking in blockchain-based IoT networks,

    F. Jameel, M. Nabeel, M. A. Jamshed, and R. J ¨antti, “Minimizing forking in blockchain-based IoT networks,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

  197. [205]

    Non-terrestrial networks for 6G: Integrated, intelligent and ubiquitous connectivity,

    M. A. Jamshed, A. Kaushik, M. Dajer, A. Guidotti, F. Parzysz, E. Lagunas, M. Di Renzo, S. Chatzinotas, and O. A. Dobre, “Non-terrestrial networks for 6G: Integrated, intelligent and ubiquitous connectivity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02184 , 2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.