Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

COPU: Conformal Prediction for Uncertainty Quantification in Natural Language Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12601 v3 pith:OG4JUEGH submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords errorpredictionrateslanguagemethoduncertaintyacrosscandidate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) for Natural Language Generation (NLG) is crucial for assessing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), as it reveals confidence in predictions, identifies failure modes, and gauges output reliability. Conformal Prediction (CP), a model-agnostic method that generates prediction sets with a specified error rate, has been adopted for UQ in classification tasks, where the size of the prediction set indicates the model's uncertainty. However, when adapting CP to NLG, the sampling-based method for generating candidate outputs cannot guarantee the inclusion of the ground truth, limiting its applicability across a wide range of error rates. To address this, we propose \ourmethod, a method that explicitly adds the ground truth to the candidate outputs and uses logit scores to measure nonconformity. Our experiments with six LLMs on four NLG tasks show that \ourmethod outperforms baseline methods in calibrating error rates and empirical cover rates, offering accurate UQ across a wide range of user-specified error rates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Ghost Annotator: a Framework to Explore Human Label Variation in Content Moderation through Conformal Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Ghost Annotator framework applies conformal prediction and collaborative filtering representations to measure LLM divergence from human annotations across four models and datasets, revealing higher confidence in m...

  2. Rule-Based Moral Principles for Explaining Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A virtue-labeled lookup table maps coarse uncertainty tags to canned warnings or disclaimers; the only quantitative result is 50% tag accuracy on 20 author-written prompts, with trust improvements asserted but untested.

Pith tools