pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02411 · v1 · pith:OH5EIUKFnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Chebyshev Approximations of Feynman Integrals for Collider Physics

Samuel Abreu , Afonso Guerreiro , Ben Page This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Feynman integralsChebyshev polynomialsdifferential equationsnumerical evaluationcollider physicstwo-loop integralsphase space
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chebyshev polynomial approximations along paths solve canonical differential equations for Feynman integrals with rapid convergence and high efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method that approximates Feynman integrals by Chebyshev polynomials constructed along a path in kinematic space. It uses the integrals' analyticity to create these approximations, then evaluates them numerically in a stable way. An adaptive sampling step optimizes the fit without heavy manual tuning for singularities. Tests on two-loop five-point integrals show the approach runs in double precision and matches the speed of existing one-fold integral techniques. A reader would care because collider physics needs fast, reliable evaluations of many such integrals to compare theory with data.

Core claim

By constructing Chebyshev polynomial approximations along a path and using an adaptive method to sample for optimal convergence, the integrals' canonical differential equations can be solved numerically in a stable manner across physical phase space; the resulting implementation requires little case-by-case handling of spurious singularities and performs competitively with state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods for two-loop five-point examples.

What carries the argument

Chebyshev polynomial approximations along a path that exploit analyticity properties to produce rapidly converging representations for numerical evaluation.

If this is right

  • Numerical evaluation becomes highly efficient once the polynomial fit is built.
  • Stability holds across physical phase space in the tested two-loop five-point cases.
  • Little to no manual intervention is needed to handle spurious singularities.
  • The framework runs entirely in double-precision arithmetic.
  • Performance is competitive with current one-fold integral methods for the examined examples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same path-based approximation could be applied to integrals at higher loop orders if analyticity continues to hold.
  • Automation of path selection might reduce remaining manual choices when moving to new integral families.
  • The method could be combined with existing reduction tools to form a more complete pipeline for multi-loop amplitudes.
  • Testing on integrals with branch cuts that cross the chosen path would clarify the limits of the current adaptive sampling.

Load-bearing premise

The method depends on Feynman integrals possessing analyticity properties that permit construction of rapidly converging polynomial approximations along suitable paths.

What would settle it

Direct numerical comparison of the Chebyshev-approximated values against independent high-precision results for a known two-loop five-point integral at a physical kinematic point would show whether the claimed stability and accuracy hold.

read the original abstract

We present a novel approach for solving canonical differential equations for Feynman integrals based on an approximation of the integrals with Chebyshev polynomials. By exploiting the analyticity properties of Feynman integrals, the method constructs rapidly converging polynomial approximations along a path, enabling highly efficient numerical evaluation. Moreover, we introduce an adaptive approximation method that dynamically samples to optimise convergence. We implement this framework in double-precision arithmetic and demonstrate its stability across physical phase space using a series of two-loop, five-point examples. Our proof-of-principle implementation proves competitive with state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods, while requiring little to no case-by-case intervention to handle spurious singularities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a method for numerically evaluating Feynman integrals by constructing Chebyshev polynomial approximations along paths in phase space, exploiting the integrals' analyticity properties to solve canonical differential equations. An adaptive sampling technique optimizes convergence. Implemented in double precision, the approach is tested on two-loop five-point integrals, claiming stability across physical phase space and competitiveness with state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods while requiring minimal case-by-case intervention for spurious singularities.

Significance. If the performance and stability claims are quantitatively validated, the method could serve as an efficient, automatable tool for multi-loop integral evaluations in collider physics. The adaptation of standard Chebyshev techniques to exploit analyticity along paths, combined with adaptive sampling, represents a practical numerical advance that may reduce reliance on specialized handling of singularities in higher-point calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that the implementation 'proves competitive with state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods' and demonstrates 'stability across physical phase space' are asserted without any quantitative benchmarks, error estimates, CPU timings, or direct comparisons to existing methods. This information is load-bearing for assessing the performance assertions and must be supplied with explicit data from the results.
  2. [Numerical examples] Numerical examples section: while two-loop five-point cases are used to illustrate stability, the absence of tabulated error metrics, convergence rates, or side-by-side comparisons with one-fold integral methods prevents independent verification of the competitiveness claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] The description of the adaptive sampler would benefit from an explicit statement of the convergence criterion (e.g., a threshold on the Chebyshev coefficient decay) to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for highlighting the need for explicit quantitative support of our performance claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that the implementation 'proves competitive with state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods' and demonstrates 'stability across physical phase space' are asserted without any quantitative benchmarks, error estimates, CPU timings, or direct comparisons to existing methods. This information is load-bearing for assessing the performance assertions and must be supplied with explicit data from the results.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's performance assertions require explicit supporting data. The current manuscript contains numerical examples in Section 4 that illustrate stability on two-loop five-point integrals, but direct side-by-side timings and error comparisons with one-fold integral methods are not tabulated. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated results table (or subsection) reporting maximum absolute errors, relative errors, CPU timings on representative phase-space points, and direct comparisons against existing one-fold integral implementations, with the abstract updated to reference these quantitative results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical examples] Numerical examples section: while two-loop five-point cases are used to illustrate stability, the absence of tabulated error metrics, convergence rates, or side-by-side comparisons with one-fold integral methods prevents independent verification of the competitiveness claim.

    Authors: We accept this assessment. Although the examples demonstrate that the Chebyshev approximations remain stable across physical phase space without case-by-case singularity handling, the section does not include the requested tabulated metrics or comparisons. The revised manuscript will expand the numerical examples section with tables of error metrics versus number of Chebyshev nodes, convergence rates, CPU timings, and direct numerical comparisons to state-of-the-art one-fold integral methods on the same phase-space points. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents a numerical technique that approximates Feynman integrals via Chebyshev polynomials along paths chosen to exploit their analyticity properties, with an adaptive sampler for convergence. This is a standard construction in numerical analysis applied to the domain of canonical differential equations for integrals; the performance claims rest on explicit implementation and benchmarking against two-loop five-point examples rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or steps in the provided description reduce the claimed result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on the domain assumption that Feynman integrals possess sufficient analyticity to allow rapidly converging Chebyshev approximations along suitable paths.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Feynman integrals are analytic in appropriate regions of phase space, permitting polynomial approximation along paths.
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the basis for constructing the approximations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5628 in / 1127 out tokens · 25596 ms · 2026-07-03T09:37:18.021808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Heinrich,Collider physics at the precision frontier,Physics Reports922(Aug., 2021)

    G. Heinrich,Collider physics at the precision frontier,Physics Reports922(Aug., 2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. R¨ ontsch,Les houches 2023 – physics at tev colliders: Report on the standard model precision wishlist,SciPost Physics Community Reports(Mar., 2026)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Aliberti, T

    R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani, A. Bashir, G. Benton, J. Bijnens et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: an update,Physics Reports1143 (Nov., 2025) 1–158. – 26 –

    2025

  4. [4]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  5. [5]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,2505.20197

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    A. V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 7: Automatic Reduction with Modular Approach, 2510.07150

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, 1201.4330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition,Comput. Phys. Commun.310(2025) 109538, [2405.14621]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059, [1310.1145]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Z. Wu, J. B¨ ohm, R. Ma, J. Usovitsch, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,Performing integration-by-parts reductions using NeatIBP 1.1 + Kira,Comput. Phys. Commun.316(2025) 109798, [2502.20778]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    V. A. Smirnov,Feynman integral calculus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

    2006

  13. [13]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals. A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Researchers. UNITEXT for Physics. Springer, 2022. 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4 2022

  14. [14]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158–164

    1991

  15. [15]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams, Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 123–127

    1991

  16. [16]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower,Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals,Nucl. Phys. B412(1994) 751–816, [hep-ph/9306240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  17. [17]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for feynman graph amplitudes,Il Nuovo Cimento A110 (Dec., 1997) 1435–1452

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for feynman graph amplitudes,Il Nuovo Cimento A110 (Dec., 1997) 1435–1452

    1997

  18. [18]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions, Nuclear Physics B580(2000) 485–518

    2000

  19. [19]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    R. N. Lee, A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov,Solving differential equations for feynman integrals by expansions near singular points,Journal of High Energy Physics2018(Mar.,

  21. [21]

    Moriello,Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs + jet production at two loops,JHEP01(2020) 150, [1907.13234]

    F. Moriello,Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs + jet production at two loops,JHEP01(2020) 150, [1907.13234]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Hidding,DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,Comput

    M. Hidding,DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.269(2021) 108125, [2006.05510]. – 27 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282 (2023) 108545, [2205.03345]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Liu, Y.-Q

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and C.-Y. Wang,A systematic and efficient method to compute multi-loop master integrals,Physics Letters B779(Apr., 2018) 353–357

    2018

  25. [25]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Multiloop corrections for collider processes using auxiliary mass flow, Physical Review D105(Mar., 2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565, [2201.11669]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    R. M. Prisco, J. Ronca and F. Tramontano,LINE: Loop Integrals Numerical Evaluation, JHEP07(2025) 219, [2501.01943]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Double virtual QCD corrections to $t\bar{t}+$jet production at the LHC

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet et al., Double virtual QCD corrections tot t+jet production at the LHC,JHEP05(2026) 044, [2511.11424]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Brancaccio, M. Becchetti, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet et al., Higher-order QCD corrections to top-quark pair production in association with a jet, 2511.11431

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Petit Ros` as and W

    P. Petit Ros` as and W. J. Torres Bobadilla,Fast evaluation of Feynman integrals for Monte Carlo generators,JHEP09(2025) 210, [2507.12548]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Solution of Canonical Differential Equations for Integrals on Arbitrary Geometries

    M. Czakon and L. Tancredi,Solution of Canonical Differential Equations for Integrals on Arbitrary Geometries,2606.30354

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    IterInt: Evaluating iterated integrals via differential equations

    G. Baur and C. Duhr,IterInt: Evaluating iterated integrals via differential equations, 2606.02744

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Y. Liu, A. Matijaˇ si´ c, T. Peraro, Y. Xu, Z. Yang and Y. Zhang,Two-loop Six-point Planar Massless Feynman Integrals to HigherϵOrders,2603.16831

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Canuto, M

    C. Canuto, M. Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni and T. A. Zang,Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. 1988. 10.1007/978-3-642-84108-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84108-8 1988

  35. [35]

    Canuto, M

    C. Canuto, M. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni and T. Zang,Spectral Methods: Fundamentals in Single Domains. Scientific Computation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007

    2007

  36. [36]

    Temperton,On scalar and vector transform methods for global spectral models,Monthly Weather Review119(1991) 1303 – 1307

    C. Temperton,On scalar and vector transform methods for global spectral models,Monthly Weather Review119(1991) 1303 – 1307

    1991

  37. [37]

    Grandcl´ ement and J

    P. Grandcl´ ement and J. Novak,Spectral methods for numerical relativity,Living Reviews in Relativity12(Jan., 2009)

    2009

  38. [38]

    Helmer and F

    M. Helmer and F. Tellander,Geometric singularities of Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 065019, [2506.05042]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Mizera and S

    S. Mizera and S. Telen,Landau discriminants,JHEP08(2022) 200, [2109.08036]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen,Landau Singularities Revisited: Computational Algebraic Geometry for Feynman Integrals,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 101601, [2311.14669]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen,Principal Landau determinants,Comput. Phys. Commun. 303(2024) 109278, [2311.16219]. – 28 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Correia, M

    M. Correia, M. Giroux and S. Mizera,SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman integrals automatized,Comput. Phys. Commun.320(2026) 109970, [2503.16601]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Landau Singularities from Whitney Stratifications

    M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou and F. Tellander,Landau Singularities from Whitney Stratifications,2402.14787

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Dlapa, M

    C. Dlapa, M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou and F. Tellander,Symbol alphabets from the Landau singular locus,JHEP10(2023) 161, [2304.02629]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    T. A. Driscoll, N. Hale and L. N. Trefethen, eds.,Chebfun Guide. Pafnuty Publications, Oxford, 2014

    2014

  46. [46]

    Battles and L

    Z. Battles and L. N. Trefethen,An extension of matlab to continuous functions and operators,SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing25(2004) 1743–1770, [https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503430126]

    work page doi:10.1137/s1064827503430126 2004

  47. [47]

    J. L. Aurentz and L. N. Trefethen,Chopping a Chebyshev Series,arXiv e-prints(Dec., 2015) arXiv:1512.01803, [1512.01803]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov,Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles, JHEP20(2020) 167, [2009.07803]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Pentagon functions for one-mass planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP01(2022) 096, [2110.10111]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow et al.,All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141601, [2306.15431]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    L. N. Trefethen,Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice, Extended Edition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2019. 10.1137/1.9781611975949

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9781611975949 2019

  52. [52]

    Mason and D

    J. Mason and D. C. Handscomb,Chebyshev Polynomials. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2002. 10.1201/9781420036114

    work page doi:10.1201/9781420036114 2002

  53. [53]

    Bernstein,Sur l’ordre de la meilleure approximation des fonctions continues par des polynˆ omes de degr´ e donn´ e,M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie royale de Belgique4(1912) 1–104

    S. Bernstein,Sur l’ordre de la meilleure approximation des fonctions continues par des polynˆ omes de degr´ e donn´ e,M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie royale de Belgique4(1912) 1–104

    1912

  54. [54]

    Bernstein,Sur la meilleure approximation de|x|par des polynomes de degr´ es donn´ es,Acta Mathematica37(1914) 1–57

    S. Bernstein,Sur la meilleure approximation de|x|par des polynomes de degr´ es donn´ es,Acta Mathematica37(1914) 1–57

    1914

  55. [55]

    J. P. Boyd,Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods. Courier Corporation, 2013

    2013

  56. [56]

    C. W. Clenshaw,A note on the summation of chebyshev series,Mathematics of Computation 9(1955) 118–120

    1955

  57. [57]

    Cheney and D

    E. Cheney and D. Kincaid,Numerical Mathematics and Computing. Cengage Learning, 2012

    2012

  58. [58]

    W. H. Press, ed.,Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, 3 ed., 2007

    2007

  59. [59]

    Salvatori,The Tropical Geometry of Subtraction Schemes,2406.14606

    G. Salvatori,The Tropical Geometry of Subtraction Schemes,2406.14606

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    SubTropica

    M. Giroux, S. Mizera and G. Salvatori,SubTropica,2604.20954

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Borinsky,Tropical Monte Carlo quadrature for Feynman integrals,Ann

    M. Borinsky,Tropical Monte Carlo quadrature for Feynman integrals,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.10(2023) 635–685, [2008.12310]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Borinsky, H

    M. Borinsky, H. J. Munch and F. Tellander,Tropical Feynman integration in the Minkowski regime,Comput. Phys. Commun.292(2023) 108874, [2302.08955]. – 29 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Heinrich, S

    G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, F. Langer, V. Magerya et al.,Expansion by regions with pySecDec,Comput. Phys. Commun.273(2022) 108267, [2108.10807]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Geometric approach to asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals

    A. Pak and A. Smirnov,Geometric approach to asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1626, [1011.4863]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Hillman and S. Mizera,Feynman polytopes and the tropical geometry of UV and IR divergences,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 125013, [2202.12296]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Chebyshev Approximations of Feynman Integrals for Collider Physics

    S. Abreu, A. Guerreiro and B. Page,Ancillary files for “Chebyshev Approximations of Feynman Integrals for Collider Physics”, 2026. 10.5281/zenodo.21134108

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.21134108 2026

  67. [67]

    Byers and C

    N. Byers and C. N. Yang,Physical Regions in Invariant Variables for n Particles and the Phase-Space Volume Element,Rev. Mod. Phys.36(1964) 595–609

    1964

  68. [68]

    Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 062001, [1511.05409]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2018) 103, [1807.09812]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng,Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP01(2019) 006, [1807.11522]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser,Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP03(2019) 042, [1809.06240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    The two-loop five-point amplitude in $\mathcal{N} =4$ super-Yang-Mills theory

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng,The two-loop five-point amplitude inN= 4super-Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 121603, [1812.08941]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,All Master Integrals for Three-Jet Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 041603, [1812.11160]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng,Two-Loop Integrals for Planar Five-Point One-Mass Processes,JHEP11(2020) 117, [2005.04195]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    D. D. Canko, C. G. Papadopoulos and N. Syrrakos,Analytic representation of all planar two-loop five-point Master Integrals with one off-shell leg,JHEP01(2021) 199, [2009.13917]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Maheria,Semi- and Fully-Inclusive Phase-Space Integrals at Four Loops

    V. Maheria,Semi- and Fully-Inclusive Phase-Space Integrals at Four Loops. PhD thesis, Hamburg U., 2022. [77]https://gitlab.com/pentagon-functions

    2022

  77. [77]

    Kleiss, W

    R. Kleiss, W. J. Stirling and S. D. Ellis,A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies,Comput. Phys. Commun.40(1986) 359

    1986

  78. [78]

    J. Henn, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A first look at the function space for planar two-loop six-particle Feynman integrals,JHEP03(2022) 056, [2112.10605]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Abreu, P

    S. Abreu, P. F. Monni, B. Page and J. Usovitsch,Planar six-point Feynman integrals for four-dimensional gauge theories,JHEP06(2025) 112, [2412.19884]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    J. M. Henn, A. Matijaˇ si´ c, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A computation of two-loop six-point Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization,JHEP08(2024) 027, [2403.19742]. – 30 –

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.