REVIEW 3 cited by
Vision-Language Models for Medical Report Generation and Visual Question Answering: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) combine computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP) to analyze visual and textual medical data. Our paper reviews recent advancements in developing VLMs specialized for healthcare, focusing on models designed for medical report generation and visual question answering (VQA). We provide background on NLP and CV, explaining how techniques from both fields are integrated into VLMs to enable learning from multimodal data. Key areas we address include the exploration of medical vision-language datasets, in-depth analyses of architectures and pre-training strategies employed in recent noteworthy medical VLMs, and comprehensive discussion on evaluation metrics for assessing VLMs' performance in medical report generation and VQA. We also highlight current challenges and propose future directions, including enhancing clinical validity and addressing patient privacy concerns. Overall, our review summarizes recent progress in developing VLMs to harness multimodal medical data for improved healthcare applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
DrVD-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Reason Like Human Doctors in Medical Image Diagnosis?
A new five-level medical imaging benchmark, DrVD-Bench, shows that vision-language models lose accuracy sharply as reasoning complexity grows and often diagnose without grounding in lesion evidence.
-
DentiAsk: A VQA Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning in Panoramic Dental Radiographs
A 1,000-image, 10,000-QA dental VQA benchmark shows current VLMs handle descriptive recognition far better than spatial localization or numerical counting on panoramic radiographs.
-
DobicVLM: Aligning Chest X-Ray Report Generation with Clinically-Grounded Programmatic Rewards via Group Relative Policy Optimization
A GRPO-tuned medical VLM using rule-based rewards reaches 27.2% expert acceptance for diagnostic impression accuracy on 69 CXR cases, barely beating its base model and clearly beating a generalist Gemini baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.