Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Vision-Language Models for Medical Report Generation and Visual Question Answering: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02469 v2 pith:OHD3BRVL submitted 2024-03-04 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords medicalvlmsdatagenerationmodelsrecentreportvision-language
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) combine computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP) to analyze visual and textual medical data. Our paper reviews recent advancements in developing VLMs specialized for healthcare, focusing on models designed for medical report generation and visual question answering (VQA). We provide background on NLP and CV, explaining how techniques from both fields are integrated into VLMs to enable learning from multimodal data. Key areas we address include the exploration of medical vision-language datasets, in-depth analyses of architectures and pre-training strategies employed in recent noteworthy medical VLMs, and comprehensive discussion on evaluation metrics for assessing VLMs' performance in medical report generation and VQA. We also highlight current challenges and propose future directions, including enhancing clinical validity and addressing patient privacy concerns. Overall, our review summarizes recent progress in developing VLMs to harness multimodal medical data for improved healthcare applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DrVD-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Reason Like Human Doctors in Medical Image Diagnosis?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new five-level medical imaging benchmark, DrVD-Bench, shows that vision-language models lose accuracy sharply as reasoning complexity grows and often diagnose without grounding in lesion evidence.

  2. DentiAsk: A VQA Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning in Panoramic Dental Radiographs

    q-bio.QM 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 1,000-image, 10,000-QA dental VQA benchmark shows current VLMs handle descriptive recognition far better than spatial localization or numerical counting on panoramic radiographs.

  3. DobicVLM: Aligning Chest X-Ray Report Generation with Clinically-Grounded Programmatic Rewards via Group Relative Policy Optimization

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GRPO-tuned medical VLM using rule-based rewards reaches 27.2% expert acceptance for diagnostic impression accuracy on 69 CXR cases, barely beating its base model and clearly beating a generalist Gemini baseline.

Pith tools