REVIEW 1 cited by
Experimental results from applying GPT-4 to an unpublished formal language
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Can large language models be used to complete mathematical tasks that are traditionally performed either manually or with the aid of theorem provers? To answer this question, a state-of-the-art system, GPT-4, was provided with a concise natural language specification for a previously unpublished formal system and asked to complete a number of tasks, from stating function and type definitions to proving simple theorems and verifying user-supplied proofs. The system completed all tasks successfully, showed extensive domain knowledge, invented helpful new syntax and semantics, and exhibited generalization and inference abilities. So the answer seems to be: yes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Grammars of Formal Uncertainty: When to Trust LLMs in Automated Reasoning Tasks
A grammar-based model of LLM-generated SMT-LIB code produces uncertainty signals that predict formalization errors on some reasoning tasks, with fused signals giving large error reductions only in an in-sample evaluation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.