Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Connection between steep radio spectral slopes and dust extinction in QSOs: evidence for outflow-driven shocks in dusty QSO

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dusty quasars are four times more likely to show steep radio spectra than non-dusty ones.

desk verdict A careful observational study with new uGMRT data that overstates a statistically marginal and fragile steep-vs-dust trend; the data are valuable but the abstract and conclusions need major qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10501 v1 pith:OKBINF7G submitted 2025-01-17 astro-ph.GA

V. A. Fawcett , C. M. Harrison , D. M. Alexander , L. K. Morabito , P. Kharb , D. J. Rosario , Janhavi Baghel , Salmoli Ghosh
show 4 more authors
Silpa S. J. Petley C. Sargent G. Calistro Rivera
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords quasarsradiospectralindexdustextinctionactivegalacticnucleioutflowsshocksuGMRTe-MERLIN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper combines new low-frequency uGMRT observations with archival data to build four-to-five-band radio spectra for 38 quasars, split by how much dust they contain. It finds that quasars with significant dust extinction (E(B-V) > 0.1 mag) are about four times more likely to have steep radio spectra (spectral index alpha < -0.5) than non-dusty ones (46% vs 12%), while non-dusty quasars more often show peaked spectra (48% vs 23%). The authors interpret this as evidence that the radio emission in dusty quasars comes from shocks driven by outflows, not from compact jets, supporting an evolutionary picture in which dusty quasars are a young, blow-out phase that clears the dust to reveal a normal blue quasar.

What carries the argument

The paper constructs radio spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from 0.144 to 3 GHz using new uGMRT 400/650 MHz flux measurements plus archival LoTSS, FIRST, VLASS, and TGSS data, and fits each SED with three models: a single power law, a broken power law, and a curved (peaked) model. Model selection uses the Bayesian Information Criterion with thresholds that prefer the simplest model, and each source is classified as steep, flat, inverted, peaked, or curved. The classification, together with 0.2-arcsecond e-MERLIN sizes from the parent sample, allows the authors to compare the radio SEDs of dusty and non-dusty quasars and to test whether the peaked sources are consistent with GPS/CSS jetted sources.

What would settle it

Measure the low-frequency flux of the four upturned quasars with a radio telescope that resolves the extended lobes, such as the Very Long Baseline Array; if the compact core shows a spectral turnover at LoTSS frequencies, the two-component interpretation is wrong and the steep-spectrum fractions would change.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an empirical connection between dust obscuration and radio spectral shape: dusty quasars preferentially show steep, optically-thin synchrotron spectra, whereas non-dusty quasars preferentially show peaked spectra consistent with compact, self-absorbed jets. The steep spectra in dusty quasars are attributed to shocks generated when outflowing winds or low-power jets interact with the dusty interstellar medium, and the authors argue this supports the blow-out evolutionary scenario in which the shocks heat and destroy the surrounding dust.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of four 'upturned' quasars as two-component sources relies on the assumption that their low-frequency LoTSS emission is a separate ancient relic and not part of the same compact synchrotron spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The radio spectral shape can be used as a fast diagnostic of whether a quasar is in a dusty blow-out phase or hosts a compact jet.
  • The excess of steep spectra in dusty quasars implies that the enhanced radio emission in red quasars is produced by shocks, not by star formation or orientation.
  • The higher fraction of peaked spectra in non-dusty quasars supports the idea that these systems host young or frustrated jets.
  • The wind-shock model calculations show that accretion-disc winds alone cannot power the radio emission in the most radio-loud members, suggesting low-power jets as the outflow driver in those cases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same SED-fitting method applied to a larger, dust-selected quasar sample (e.g., from DESI) could reveal whether the fraction of steep-spectrum sources increases continuously with E(B-V), which would strengthen the case for a causal connection.
  • If the shock origin is correct, the steep dusty quasars should show stronger ionized or molecular outflows and hotter dust (mid-IR excess) than the peaked non-dusty quasars; near-infrared spectroscopy could test this.
  • The upturned sources, after removing the LoTSS data, appear as peaked cores on top of steep relic emission; this is consistent with restarted radio activity, and future high-frequency observations could confirm whether the relic lobes are truly detached.
  • The four-times-greater fraction of steep spectra among dusty quasars is based on only 38 objects; a dedicated survey with a sample of a few hundred would determine whether the effect is as large as reported or diluted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs 4–5 band radio SEDs between 0.144 and 3 GHz for 38 intermediate-redshift QSOs, combining new uGMRT Band-3/Band-4 observations with archival LoTSS, FIRST, VLASS, TGSS, and LoLSS data. The SEDs are fit with power-law, broken power-law, and curved models, and the best-fit shapes are used to classify sources as steep, flat, peaked, or curved. The central claim is that dusty QSOs (E(B-V)>0.1 mag) are more likely to show steep radio spectral slopes (alpha<-0.5) than non-dusty QSOs, with reported fractions of 46±12% and 12±4%, and that this steepness is evidence for an outflow-driven shock origin for the enhanced radio emission in dusty QSOs.

Significance. If the central claim is robust, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the debate on whether red/dusty QSOs represent a blow-out phase: it uses an independent data set (new uGMRT observations), carefully documents the data reduction and SED fitting, and combines the SED shapes with existing e-MERLIN size information. The authors are also commendably transparent about data availability and about the limitations of their sample size. However, the headline statistical evidence is currently fragile: the reported p-values do not support the wording used in the abstract and Section 4.1, and the main 2x2 comparison is not accompanied by a p-value and is sensitive to the removal of single objects. The interpretation is plausible but needs to be matched to the actual statistical strength of the result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2 / Abstract] The headline claim that dusty QSOs are more likely to be steep is based on 6/13 versus 3/25 sources, but no p-value is reported for this 2x2 comparison. A Fisher exact test gives p≈0.04, which is only marginal, and the difference is not robust to the removal of a single source: excluding the most extincted object, 1007+2853 (E(B-V)=0.59), leaves 5/12 versus 3/25 and raises the Fisher exact p to approximately 0.08, above the conventional significance threshold. Because this comparison is the load-bearing result of the paper, the authors should report a p-value, include a jackknife or bootstrap sensitivity analysis, and temper the abstract wording accordingly.
  2. [Section 4.1] Section 4.1 describes the Spearman correlation between alpha and E(B-V) as a 'weak but significant correlation (rho=-0.37, p=0.11)'. A p-value of 0.11 is not significant at the conventional 0.05 level, and the paper itself notes in Section 3.2 that removing the most extincted QSO reduces the correlation to rho=-0.27, p=0.26. The phrase 'weak but significant' is therefore internally inconsistent with the reported statistics. The authors should either use a more accurate description ('marginally significant', 'tentative', or similar) or provide a statistical threshold and justify why p=0.11 should be considered significant for this small sample.
  3. [Section 2.6 / Table 3] The treatment of the four 'upturned' QSOs has a direct effect on the claimed excess of peaked SEDs in non-dusty QSOs. For three non-dusty QSOs (1046+3427, 1203+4510, 1630+3847), the LoTSS point is removed and the sources are reclassified as peaked; the paper's peaked fraction of 48±9% for non-dusty QSOs therefore depends on the assumption that the low-frequency LoTSS emission is a separate relic component rather than part of the same compact synchrotron spectrum. If the LoTSS emission belongs to the same component, these sources would instead be steep or otherwise different, and the peaked/non-peaked contrast would shrink. The authors should at least quantify how the peaked-fraction comparison changes if the LoTSS points are retained or if the four upturned sources are treated as unclassified.
  4. [Section 3.2 / Table 3] The conclusion that dusty QSOs have steeper spectra is partly entangled with the choice of the E(B-V)=0.1 mag split and with the adoption of alpha_high or alpha_low for broken power-law sources. The continuous correlation is already non-significant at p=0.11, so the binned comparison carries most of the weight, but the binned comparison uses a threshold that is not varied across a range of values. A simple sensitivity test varying the split between, say, E(B-V)=0.05 and 0.2 mag would show whether the 46% versus 12% difference is stable or is an artifact of the chosen boundary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2 / Figure 3 caption] The Figure 3 caption contains a duplicated word: 'the the boundary' should be 'the boundary'.
  2. [Section 4.3] The text refers to the 'viral relation' for black hole mass estimation; this should be 'virial relation'.
  3. [Section 1 / Section 2.1] The abstract states the redshift range as 1.0<z<1.5 while Section 2.1 states 1.0<z<1.55; these should be made consistent (Table 1 shows z=1.53 for 1630+3847).
  4. [Section 2.4 / Section 2.3] In the introductory text, the frequency range is written as '0.144MHz–3GHz'; this should be '0.144–3 GHz' for clarity, and the same notation should be used consistently throughout.
  5. [Data Availability] The DOI for the uGMRT data is split across a line break in an unclear way ('https://doi.org/10. 101...'), which will not resolve correctly; please provide the full URL in a machine-readable form.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central radio SED classification and dust-extinction comparison rest on independent data sets, not on fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that dusty QSOs (E(B-V)>0.1 mag) show a higher fraction of steep radio spectral slopes than non-dusty QSOs — is an empirical comparison between two independently measured quantities. The radio slopes come from new uGMRT Band-3/Band-4 data combined with archival surveys and SED model fitting (Section 2.6), while the dust extinction comes from fitting a blue QSO template to SDSS spectra (Section 2.7). Neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, and the E(B-V)=0.1 mag split is applied as a post-hoc binning choice rather than fitted to the radio data. Self-citations (Fawcett et al. 2022, 2023; Rosario et al. 2021) supply the spectral template, prior detection-rate context, and e-MERLIN sample, but none of these is invoked to force the steep-fraction difference; the uGMRT measurements are new and independent. The wind-shock model of Nims et al. (2015) is external, and the paper uses it to compute required efficiencies rather than to predict the observed fractions. The main weakness is statistical robustness, not circularity: Section 3.2 reports Spearman rho=-0.37, p=0.11, which drops to rho=-0.27, p=0.26 when the most extincted QSO is removed, and Section 4.1 labels this 'weak but significant'. This is a legitimate concern about significance and single-source leverage, but it does not make the claim true by construction. The reclassification of 'upturned' sources by removing LoTSS data points is an explicit modeling assumption, disclosed in Section 2.6; it affects the peaked/curved comparison but does not reduce the headline result to a fitted input. No equation equates a predicted quantity to an input parameter, and no load-bearing result rests on a self-citation chain. Hence score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on classification thresholds (E(B-V)=0.1, alpha=-0.5, R=-3.7) chosen by hand, and on domain assumptions that steep spectra trace shocked synchrotron emission and peaked spectra trace compact jets. No new physical entities are introduced. The E(B-V) measurements themselves rely on a template-fitting method from the authors' prior work.

free parameters (5)
  • E(B-V) dusty threshold = 0.1 mag
    Chosen boundary to split sample into dusty and non-dusty; based on previous Fawcett et al. (2023) but not derived within this paper.
  • steep spectral index boundary = alpha = -0.5
    Classification threshold for steep vs flat radio spectra; standard in literature.
  • radio-loudness split = R = -3.7
    Split between radio-quiet/intermediate and extreme radio-loud, adopted from K19.
  • BIC model selection thresholds = Delta BIC > 10 for curve, >5 for BPL
    Chosen to avoid over-fitting; influence model classification.
  • wind luminosity fraction = 0.05 L_bol
    Assumed in Nims et al. (2015) model to compute required eta_wind; affects the wind-shock feasibility test.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Steep radio spectra (alpha < -0.5) trace optically-thin synchrotron emission from evolved shocks or jets.
    Used throughout to interpret steep PL/BPL sources; cited to Faucher-Giguere & Quataert 2012, Nims et al. 2015.
  • domain assumption Peaked radio SEDs trace self-absorbed compact jets (GPS/CSS-like).
    Used to associate peaked sources with jetted systems; see Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Star formation is not a significant contributor to the radio emission at L_1.4GHz ~ 10^25.5-26.5 W/Hz.
    Justifies neglecting SF in discussion; based on prior studies Fawcett et al. 2020, Rosario et al. 2020, Calistro Rivera et al. 2021, Yue et al. 2024.
  • domain assumption The blue QSO composite and the simple power-law extinction law (R_V=4) yield accurate E(B-V) estimates from SDSS spectra.
    Underpins the dusty/non-dusty split; Section 2.7.
  • domain assumption The Nims et al. (2015) wind-shock model and L_wind=0.05 L_bol are applicable to these QSOs.
    Used to compute required eta_wind; if the model is wrong, the wind-shock test is invalid.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Connection between steep radio spectral slopes and dust extinction in QSOs: evidence for outflow-driven shocks in dusty QSO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OKBINF7G

@misc{pith2026250110501,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Connection between steep radio spectral slopes and dust extinction in QSOs: evidence for outflow-driven shocks in dusty QSO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OKBINF7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10501}
}
abstract

Recent studies have found a striking positive correlation between the amount of dust obscuration and enhanced radio emission in quasi-stellar objects (QSOs). However, what causes this connection remains unclear. In this paper we analyse uGMRT Band-3 (400 MHz) and Band-4 (650 MHz) data of a sample of 38 $1.0 < z < 1.5$ QSOs with existing high-resolution $0.2''$ e-MERLIN 1.4 GHz imaging. In combination with archival radio data, we have constructed sensitive 4-5 band radio SEDs across 0.144-3 GHz to further characterize the radio emission in dusty QSOs. We find that the dusty QSOs (those with E(B-V) $> 0.1$ mag) are more likely to exhibit steep spectral slopes ($\alpha < -0.5$; $S_{\nu} \propto \nu^{\alpha}$) than the non-dusty QSOs (E(B-V) $< 0.1$ mag), with fractions of 46$\pm$12 and 12$\pm$4 per cent, respectively. A higher fraction of the non-dusty QSOs have peaked radio SEDs (48$\pm$9 per cent) compared to the dusty QSOs (23$\pm$8 per cent). We discuss the origin of the radio emission, finding that the majority of the peaked, predominantly non-dusty, QSOs have consistent sizes and luminosities with compact jetted radio galaxies. However, the connection between steepness and dust obscuration implies an outflow-driven shock origin for the enhanced radio more commonly found in dusty QSOs. These results add to the emerging picture whereby dusty QSOs are in an earlier blow-out phase, with shocks that heat and destroy the surrounding dust, eventually revealing a typical non-dusty QSO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10501 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ), following the same method as Klindt et al. (2019); hereafter, K19. The QSOs were also selected to be detected in FIRST, with no visibly resolved radio emission beyond the 5 ′′ resolution. In order to robustly determine the radio morphology via visual inspection, additional cuts were applied: a 1.4 GHz flux density of > 3 mJy, a peak flux S/N > 15, and a flux ratio between FIRST and the 20 cm NRAO VLA Sky Survey (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Top) Three radio SED examples, displaying a flat PL (left), a steep BPL (middle), and a peaked (right) best-fitting model. (Bottom) Example SEDs of a QSO that was visually classified as upturned due to no model producing a good fit to the data and extended LoTSS emission identified in the image. After removing the LoTSS data point, the SED was refitted with the peak model providing a good fit to the data (right). F… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The uGMRT Band-3–4 (400–650 MHz) radio spectral slope versus (left) 𝐸 (𝐵 − 𝑉) and (right) radio-loudness (R) for the rQSOs (red) and cQSOs (blue). The QSOs with extended 0. ′′2 e-MERLIN radio emission are indicated by the black crosses. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients displayed on both panels reveal a weak negative and positive trend between the radio spectral slope and 𝐸 (𝐵 − 𝑉) and R, respectively. Th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radio-loudness versus dust extinction for the QSOs, split into sources best fit with the PL or BPL models (orange circles) or the curve model (green diamonds). The dashed vertical line indicates the split be￾tween radio-quiet/radio-intermediate (R < −3.7) and extreme r…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radio spectral index obtained from the PL (circles) and BPL (diamonds) models versus 𝐸 (𝐵 − 𝑉), removing the unconstrained sources (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 𝐿1.4 GHz versus projected linear size for the full sample, with the colour bar indicating dust extinction. The e-MERLIN extended sources with a radio SED best fit by either a PL/BPL with 𝛼 > 0 or a curve model are indicated by the circles and squares, respectively. The…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Peak observed frequency versus projected size obtained from e￾MERLIN for the QSOs with either a curved (green), or a steep PL/BPL (orange) radio spectrum, removing the unconstrained sources (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Top) radio spectral slope from the PL/BPL models versus Ed￾dington ratio, removing the unconstrained sources (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Non-thermal emission in jets and winds: Expected emission and spectral index distributions

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-consistent CRE evolution in RMHD simulations produces distinct spectral-index gradients that distinguish compact AGN jets from winds even when morphology is ambiguous.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

156 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346088 , 125, 383

    Alexander D. M., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346088 , 125, 383

    work page doi:10.1086/346088 2003

  2. [2]

    A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/77 , 760, 77

    An T., Baan W. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/77 , 760, 77

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/77 2012

  3. [3]

    Ananthakrishnan S., 1995, JA&A, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995JApAS..16..427A 16, 427

    1995

  4. [4]

    Andonie C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2800 , 517, 2577

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2800 2022

  5. [5]

    C., Ferland G

    Arakawa N., Fabian A. C., Ferland G. J., Ishibashi W., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.5069A 517, 5069

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3044 2022

  6. [7]

    M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...618..108B 618, 108

    Barvainis R., Leh \'a r J., Birkinshaw M., Falcke H., Blundell K. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...618..108B 618, 108

    doi:10.1086/425859 2005

  7. [8]

    Baskin A., Laor A., 2005, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08841.x , 358, 1043

    arXiv 2005

  8. [9]

    A., O'Dea C

    Baum S. A., O'Dea C. P., Murphy D. W., de Bruyn A. G., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...232...19B 232, 19

    1990

Show all 156 references
  1. [10]

    H., White R

    Becker R. H., White R. L., Helfand D. J., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450..559B 450, 559

    1995 doi

  2. [11]

    V., Dopita M

    Bicknell G. V., Dopita M. A., O Dea C. P. O., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304400 , 485, 112

    1997 doi

  3. [12]

    V., Mukherjee D., Wagner A

    Bicknell G. V., Mukherjee D., Wagner A. Y., Sutherland R. S., Nesvadba N. P. H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty070 , 475, 3493

    2018 doi

  4. [13]

    D., K \"o nigl A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...34B 232, 34

    Blandford R. D., K \"o nigl A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...34B 232, 34

    1979 doi

  5. [14]

    A., Green R

    Boroson T. A., Green R. F., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191661 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...80..109B 80, 109

    1992 doi

  6. [15]

    Calistro Rivera G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.3468C 469, 3468

    2017 doi

  7. [16]

    Calistro Rivera G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A.102C 649, A102

    2021 doi

  8. [17]

    arXiv:2312.10177

    Calistro Rivera G., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2312.10177 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231210177C p. arXiv:2312.10177

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [18]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/174 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836..174C 836, 174

    Callingham J. R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/174 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836..174C 836, 174

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    Cameron E., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS10046 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011PASA...28..128C 28, 128

    2011 doi

  11. [20]

    C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/215.3.463 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.215..463C 215, 463

    Carvalho J. C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/215.3.463 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.215..463C 215, 463

    1985 doi

  12. [21]

    arXiv:2408.15934

    Chen S., et al., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240815934C p. arXiv:2408.15934

    2024 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Cirasuolo M., et al., 2020, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Msngr.180...10C 180, 10

    2020 doi

  14. [23]

    J., Cotton W

    Condon J. J., Cotton W. D., Greisen E. W., Yin Q. F., Perley R. A., Taylor G. B., Broderick J. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1693C 115, 1693

    1998 doi

  15. [24]

    J., Kellermann K

    Condon J. J., Kellermann K. I., Kimball A. E., Ivezi \'c Z ., Perley R. A., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768...37C 768, 37

    2013 doi

  16. [25]

    arXiv:1611.00036

    DESI Collaboration et al., 2016a, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161100036D p. arXiv:1611.00036

    arXiv

  17. [26]

    arXiv:1611.00037

    DESI Collaboration et al., 2016b, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161100037D p. arXiv:1611.00037

    arXiv

  18. [27]

    M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20239.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421..108D 421, 108

    Duffy P., Blundell K. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20239.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421..108D 421, 108

    2012

  19. [28]

    J., Simon R., Schalinski C., Kuhr H., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&A...168...17E 168, 17

    Eckart A., Witzel A., Biermann P., Johnston K. J., Simon R., Schalinski C., Kuhr H., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&A...168...17E 168, 17

    1986

  20. [29]

    L., Riley J

    Fanaroff B. L., Riley J. M., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P , 167, 31P

    1974 doi

  21. [30]

    T., Spencer R

    Fanti R., Fanti C., Schilizzi R. T., Spencer R. E., Nan Rendong Parma P., van Breugel W. J. M., Venturi T., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...231..333F 231, 333

    1990

  22. [31]

    T., Spencer R

    Fanti C., Fanti R., Dallacasa D., Schilizzi R. T., Spencer R. E., Stanghellini C., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&A...302..317F 302, 317

    1995

  23. [33]

    A., Alexander D

    Fawcett V. A., Alexander D. M., Rosario D. J., Klindt L., Fotopoulou S., Lusso E., Morabito L. K., Calistro Rivera G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.4802F 494, 4802

    2020 doi

  24. [34]

    A., Alexander D

    Fawcett V. A., Alexander D. M., Rosario D. J., Klindt L., 2021, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies9040107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Galax...9..107F 9, 107

    2021 doi

  25. [35]

    A., Alexander D

    Fawcett V. A., Alexander D. M., Rosario D. J., Klindt L., Lusso E., Morabito L. K., Calistro Rivera G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac945 , 513, 1254

    2022 doi

  26. [36]

    A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5575F 525, 5575

    Fawcett V. A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5575F 525, 5575

    2023 doi

  27. [37]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  28. [38]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  29. [39]

    L., Bendo G., Rowan-Robinson M., Nandra K., Brotherton M

    Georgakakis A., Clements D. L., Bendo G., Rowan-Robinson M., Nandra K., Brotherton M. S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14344.x , 394, 533

    2009

  30. [40]

    M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20446.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.2223G 421, 2223

    Georgakakis A., Grossi M., Afonso J., Hopkins A. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20446.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.2223G 421, 2223

    2012

  31. [41]

    Girdhar A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1608G 512, 1608

    2022 doi

  32. [42]

    J., White R

    Glikman E., Helfand D. J., White R. L., Becker R. H., Gregg M. D., Lacy M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2007ApJ...667..673G 667, 673

    2007 doi

  33. [43]

    Glikman E., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/51 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...51G 757, 51

    2012 doi

  34. [44]

    Glikman E., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6bee , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..119G 934, 119

    2022 doi

  35. [45]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [RNAAS] 10.3847/2515-5172/abbe23 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..175G 4, 175

    Gordon Y. A., et al., 2020, @doi [RNAAS] 10.3847/2515-5172/abbe23 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..175G 4, 175

    2020 doi

  36. [46]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac05c0 , 255, 30

    Gordon Y. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac05c0 , 255, 30

    2021 doi

  37. [47]

    Gupta Y., et al., 2017, @doi [Current Science] 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/707-714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017CSci..113..707G 113, 707

    2017 doi

  38. [48]

    Haidar H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.4645H 532, 4645

    2024 doi

  39. [49]

    L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38...58H 38, e058

    Hale C. L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38...58H 38, e058

    2021 doi

  40. [50]

    Hamann F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2387 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.3431H 464, 3431

    2017 doi

  41. [51]

    J., Sadler E

    Hancock P. J., Sadler E. M., Mahony E. K., Ricci R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17199.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1187H 408, 1187

    2010

  42. [52]

    Hardcastle M., Croston J., 2020, @doi [ ] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2020.101539 , 88, 101539

    2020

  43. [53]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.151H 678, A151

    2023 doi

  44. [54]

    M., Ramos Almeida C., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240408050H p

    Harrison C. M., Ramos Almeida C., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240408050H p. arXiv:2404.08050

    2024 arXiv

  45. [55]

    J., Doi A., Nagai H., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240407726H p

    Hayashi T. J., Doi A., Nagai H., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240407726H p. arXiv:2404.07726

    2024 doi arXiv

  46. [56]

    J., White R

    Helfand D. J., White R. L., Becker R. H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801...26H 801, 26

    2015 doi

  47. [57]

    F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..171H 884, 171

    H \"o nig S. F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..171H 884, 171

    2019 doi

  48. [58]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Robertson B., Springel V., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2006ApJS..163....1H 163, 1

    2006 doi

  49. [59]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Kere s D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2008ApJS..175..356H 175, 356

    2008 doi

  50. [60]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38....9H 38, e009

    Hotan A. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38....9H 38, e009

    2021 doi

  51. [61]

    L., Alexandroff R

    Hwang H.-C., Zakamska N. L., Alexandroff R. M., Hamann F., Greene J. E., Perrotta S., Richards G. T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty742 , 477, 830

    2018 doi

  52. [62]

    T., Jagannathan P., Mooley K

    Intema H. T., Jagannathan P., Mooley K. P., Frail D. A., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A..78I 598, A78

    2017 doi

  53. [63]

    C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451...93I 451, 93

    Ishibashi W., Fabian A. C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451...93I 451, 93

    2015 doi

  54. [64]

    C., Maiolino R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476..512I 476, 512

    Ishibashi W., Fabian A. C., Maiolino R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476..512I 476, 512

    2018 doi

  55. [65]

    E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.2710J 485, 2710

    Jarvis M. E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.2710J 485, 2710

    2019 doi

  56. [66]

    Jeyakumar S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3786J 458, 3786

    2016 doi

  57. [67]

    Johnston S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS07033 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASA...24..174J 24, 174

    2007 doi

  58. [68]

    K., Brienza M., Barthel P., Miley G

    Jurlin N., Morganti R., Sweijen F., Morabito L. K., Brienza M., Barthel P., Miley G. K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.118J 682, A118

    2024 doi

  59. [69]

    H., 2021, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-020-09677-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ExA....51...95K 51, 95

    Kale R., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., 2021, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-020-09677-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ExA....51...95K 51, 95

    2021 doi

  60. [70]

    I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D

    Kellermann K. I., Sramek R., Schmidt M., Shaffer D. B., Green R., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....98.1195K 98, 1195

    1989 doi

  61. [71]

    F., Allison J

    Kerrison E. F., Allison J. R., Moss V. A., Sadler E. M., Rees G. A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16201 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240716201K p. arXiv:2407.16201

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [72]

    F., Ishwara-Chandra C

    Kharb P., Srivastava S., Singh V., Gallimore J. F., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Ananda H., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw699 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.1310K 459, 1310

    2016 doi

  63. [73]

    Kharb P., Subramanian S., Das M., Vaddi S., Paragi Z., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919..108K 919, 108

    2021 doi

  64. [74]

    Kim D., Im M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018A&A...610A..31K 610, A31

    2018 doi

  65. [75]

    Kim D., Im M., Kim M., Kim Y., Shin S., Shim H., Song H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aceb5e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954..156K 954, 156

    2023 doi

  66. [76]

    arXiv:2408.03324

    Kim D., Kim Y., Im M., Glikman E., Kim M., Urrutia T., Lim G., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03324 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240803324K p. arXiv:2408.03324

    doi arXiv

  67. [77]

    Kim Y., Kim D., Im M., Kim M., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5d5d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..171K 972, 171

    doi

  68. [78]

    E., Kellermann K

    Kimball A. E., Kellermann K. I., Condon J. J., Ivezi \' c Z ., Perley R. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/l29 , 739, L29

    2011 doi

  69. [79]

    M., Rosario D

    Klindt L., Alexander D. M., Rosario D. J., Lusso E., Fotopoulou S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1771 , 488, 3109

    2019 doi

  70. [80]

    arXiv:2407.06265

    Kukreti P., Morganti R., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240706265K p. arXiv:2407.06265

    2024 doi arXiv

  71. [81]

    Kukreti P., Morganti R., Tadhunter C., Santoro F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A.198K 674, A198

    2023 doi

  72. [82]

    Lacy M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PASP..132c5001L 132, 035001

    2020 doi

  73. [83]

    a hteenm \

    L \"a hteenm \"a ki A., Valtaoja E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521..493L 521, 493

    1999 doi

  74. [84]

    D., Behar E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.5513L 482, 5513

    Laor A., Baldi R. D., Behar E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.5513L 482, 5513

    2019 doi

  75. [85]

    H., H \"o nig S

    Leftley J. H., H \"o nig S. F., Asmus D., Tristram K. R. W., Gandhi P., Kishimoto M., Venanzi M., Williamson D. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a0b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...55L 886, 55

    2019 doi

  76. [86]

    L., Greene J

    Liu G., Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., Nesvadba N. P. H., Liu X., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2576L 436, 2576

    2013 doi

  77. [87]

    Macfarlane C., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab1998 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.5888M 506, 5888

    2021 doi

  78. [88]

    K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.2997M 463, 2997

    Mahony E. K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.2997M 463, 2997

    2016 doi

  79. [89]

    McConnell D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2020.41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PASA...37...48M 37, e048

    2020 doi

  80. [90]

    M., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800099M p

    Meenakshi M., Mukherjee D., Bodo G., Rossi P., Harrison C. M., 2024, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800099M p. arXiv:2408.00099

    2024 arXiv

  81. [91]

    Mehdipour M., Costantini E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935205 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A..25M 625, A25

    2019 doi

  82. [92]

    K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..15M 622, A15

    Morabito L. K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A..15M 622, A15

    2019 doi

  83. [93]

    V., Wagner A

    Mukherjee D., Bicknell G. V., Wagner A. Y., Sutherland R. S., Silk J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1776 , 479, 5544

    2018 doi

  84. [94]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.15587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240915587N p

    Nair D. G., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.15587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240915587N p. arXiv:2409.15587

    2024 doi arXiv

  85. [95]

    Nims J., Quataert E., Faucher-Giguère C.-A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2648 , 447, 3612

    2015 doi

  86. [96]

    P., Radcliffe J

    Njeri A., Deane R. P., Radcliffe J. F., Beswick R. J., Thomson A. P., Muxlow T. W. B., Garrett M. A., Harrison C. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.6141N 528, 6141

    2024 doi

  87. [97]

    Nyland K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905...74N 905, 74

    2020 doi

  88. [98]

    P., Baum S

    O'Dea C. P., Baum S. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118241 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113..148O 113, 148

    1997 doi

  89. [99]

    P., Saikia D

    O'Dea C. P., Saikia D. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-021-00131-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&ARv..29....3O 29, 3

    2021 doi

  90. [100]

    P., Baum S

    O'Dea C. P., Baum S. A., Stanghellini C., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170562 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...380...66O 380, 66

    1991 doi

  91. [101]

    Orienti M., 2016, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201512257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AN....337....9O 337, 9

    2016 doi

  92. [102]

    Orienti M., Dallacasa D., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt2217 , 438, 463

    2013 doi

  93. [103]

    D., Laor A., Padovani P., Behar E., McHardy I., 2019, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41550-019-0765-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..387P 3, 387

    Panessa F., Baldi R. D., Laor A., Padovani P., Behar E., McHardy I., 2019, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41550-019-0765-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..387P 3, 387

    2019 doi

  94. [104]

    Panessa F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515..473P 515, 473

    2022 doi

  95. [105]

    Patil P., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9011 , 896, 18

    2020 doi

  96. [106]

    Patil P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac71b0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...26P 934, 26

    2022 doi

  97. [107]

    A., Butler B

    Perley R. A., Butler B. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9 , 230, 7

    2017 doi

  98. [108]

    W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.5159P 515, 5159

    Petley J. W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.5159P 515, 5159

    2022 doi

  99. [109]

    W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.1995P 529, 1995

    Petley J. W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.1995P 529, 1995

    2024 doi

  100. [110]

    B., Mutel R

    Phillips R. B., Mutel R. L., 1982, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982A&A...106...21P 106, 21

    1982

  101. [111]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P 641, A6

    2020 doi

  102. [112]

    L., Lequeux J., Maurice E., Prevot L., Rocca-Volmerange B., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&A...132..389P 132, 389

    Prevot M. L., Lequeux J., Maurice E., Prevot L., Rocca-Volmerange B., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&A...132..389P 132, 389

    1984

  103. [113]

    S., Kotilainen J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab99c5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249...17R 249, 17

    Rakshit S., Stalin C. S., Kotilainen J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab99c5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249...17R 249, 17

    2020 doi

  104. [114]

    L., Hewett P

    Rankine A. L., Hewett P. C., Banerji M., Richards G. T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.4553R 492, 4553

    2020 doi

  105. [115]

    B., Tang Y., de Bruyn A

    Rengelink R. B., Tang Y., de Bruyn A. G., Miley G. K., Bremer M. N., Roettgering H. J. A., Bremer M. A. R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1997358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..124..259R 124, 259

    1997 doi

  106. [116]

    T., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1131R 126, 1131

    Richards G. T., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1131R 126, 1131

    2003 doi

  107. [117]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2766R 131, 2766

    2006 doi

  108. [118]

    T., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141..167R 141, 167

    Richards G. T., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141..167R 141, 167

    2011 doi

  109. [119]

    J., Fawcett V

    Rosario D. J., Fawcett V. A., Klindt L., Alexander D. M., Morabito L. K., Fotopoulou S., Lusso E., Calistro Rivera G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa866 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.3061R 494, 3061

    2020 doi

  110. [120]

    J., Alexander D

    Rosario D. J., Alexander D. M., Moldon J., Klindt L., Thomson A. P., Morabito L., Fawcett V. A., Harrison C. M., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab1653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5283R 505, 5283

    2021 doi

  111. [121]

    Rose M., 2014, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#223. p. 321.03

    2014

  112. [122]

    N., Holt J., Rodr \' guez Zaur \' n J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.2150R 432, 2150

    Rose M., Tadhunter C. N., Holt J., Rodr \' guez Zaur \' n J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.2150R 432, 2150

    2013 doi

  113. [123]

    B., Lightman A

    Rybicki G. B., Lightman A. P., 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics . Wiley-VCH

    1979

  114. [124]

    P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2360S 139, 2360

    Schneider D. P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2360S 139, 2360

    2010 doi

  115. [125]

    Schwarz G., 1978, Annals of Statistics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978AnSta...6..461S 6, 461

    1978

  116. [126]

    L., Riechers D

    Shao Y., Wagg J., Wang R., Carilli C. L., Riechers D. A., Intema H. T., Weiss A., Menten K. M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A..85S 641, A85

    2020 doi

  117. [127]

    Shao Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A.159S 659, A159

    2022 doi

  118. [128]

    Shen Y., Liu X., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/125 , 753, 125

    2012 doi

  119. [129]

    W., et al., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , 598, A104

    Shimwell T. W., et al., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , 598, A104

    2017 doi

  120. [130]

    W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A...1S 659, A1

    Shimwell T. W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A...1S 659, A1

    2022 doi

  121. [131]

    C., Ishwara-Chandra C

    Silpa S., Kharb P., Ho L. C., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Jarvis M. E., Harrison C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2970 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5826S 499, 5826

    2020 doi

  122. [132]

    Sinha A., Mangla S., Datta A., 2023, @doi [JA&A] 10.1007/s12036-023-09978-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JApA...44...88S 44, 88

    2023 doi

  123. [133]

    Snellen I. A. G., Schilizzi R. T., de Bruyn A. G., Miley G. K., Rengelink R. B., Roettgering H. J., Bremer M. N., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1998281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&AS..131..435S 131, 435

    1998 doi

  124. [134]

    Snellen I. A. G., Schilizzi R. T., Miley G. K., de Bruyn A. G., Bremer M. N., Röttgering H. J. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-8711.2000.03935.x , 319, 445

    2000

  125. [135]

    C., Moderski R., Kataoka J., Wagner S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...680..911S 680, 911

    Stawarz ., Ostorero L., Begelman M. C., Moderski R., Kataoka J., Wagner S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...680..911S 680, 911

    2008 doi

  126. [136]

    C., Temple M

    Stepney M., Banerji M., Tang S., Hewett P. C., Temple M. J., Wethers C. F., Puglisi A., Molyneux S. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1970 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1919S

    2024 doi

  127. [137]

    E., Zakamska N

    Sun A.-L., Greene J. E., Zakamska N. L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..222S 835, 222

    2017 doi

  128. [138]

    K., Rao A

    Swarup G., Ananthakrishnan S., Kapahi V. K., Rao A. P., Subrahmanya C. R., Kulkarni V. K., 1991, Current Science, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991CSci...60...95S 60, 95

    1991

  129. [139]

    J., et al., 2023, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230102675T p

    Temple M. J., et al., 2023, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230102675T p. arXiv:2301.02675

    2023 arXiv

  130. [140]

    Urrutia T., Lacy M., Spoon H., Glikman E., Petric A., Schulz B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757..125U 757, 125

    2012 doi

  131. [141]

    M., Padovani P., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995PASP..107..803U 107, 803

    Urry C. M., Padovani P., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995PASP..107..803U 107, 803

    1995 doi

  132. [142]

    Venanzi M., H \"o nig S., Williamson D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba89f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..174V 900, 174

    2020 doi

  133. [143]

    Venturi G., et al., 2021, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039869 , 648, A17

    2021 doi

  134. [144]

    J., Witzel A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ARA&A..33..163W 33, 163

    Wagner S. J., Witzel A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ARA&A..33..163W 33, 163

    1995

  135. [145]

    L., Francis P

    Webster R. L., Francis P. J., Petersont B. A., Drinkwater M. J., Masci F. J., 1995, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/375469a0 , 375, 469

    1995 doi

  136. [146]

    J., Morris S

    Weymann R. J., Morris S. L., Foltz C. B., Hewett P. C., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...373...23W 373, 23

    1991 doi

  137. [147]

    T., Webster R

    Whiting M. T., Webster R. L., Francis P. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04287.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.323..718W 323, 718

    2001

  138. [148]

    J., Schmidt G

    Wilkes B. J., Schmidt G. D., Cutri R. M., Ghosh H., Hines D. C., Nelson B., Smith P. S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...564L..65W 564, L65

    2002 doi

  139. [149]

    Wo owska A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...22W 914, 22

    2021 doi

  140. [150]

    Yamada T., Sakai N., Inoue Y., Michiyama T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3a63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968..116Y 968, 116

    2024 doi

  141. [151]

    Young M., Elvis M., Risaliti G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...688..128Y 688, 128

    2008 doi

  142. [152]

    A., Turner R

    Young S. A., Turner R. J., Shabala S. S., Stewart G. S. C., Yates-Jones P. M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.14433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241214433Y p. arXiv:2412.14433

    2024 doi arXiv

  143. [153]

    H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3939Y 529, 3939

    Yue B. H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3939Y 529, 3939

    2024 doi

  144. [154]

    Zaja c ek M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630A..83Z 630, A83

    2019 doi

  145. [155]

    de Gasperin F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.165D 673, A165

    2023 doi

  146. [156]

    van Breugel W., Miley G., Heckman T., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984AJ.....89....5V 89, 5

    1984 doi

  147. [157]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    2013 doi

  148. [158]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.