Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 160 references

Investigating Temporal Features in Swift GRB Afterglows: A Comparative Study of UVOT and XRT Data

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Optical plateaus in GRB afterglows point to millisecond magnetar engines.

desk verdict A careful 200-GRB UVOT+XRT census with a genuinely new optical plateau L–t_b relation; the magnetar conclusion needs a measured-z-only refit before it is load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07560 v1 pith:ONQLABMW submitted 2025-09-09 astro-ph.HE

Amit K. Ror , S. B. Pandey , S. R. Oates , Rahul Gupta , Amar Aryan , A. J. Castro-Tirado , Sudhir Kumar This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-rayburstsopticalafterglowsSwiftUVOTX-rayplateauphasemagnetarcentralenginereverseshockDainottirelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the diversity of optical afterglow light curves of gamma-ray bursts can be sorted into a small set of temporal features—early flares, smooth bumps, breaks, plateaus—and that each feature carries a distinct physical origin. Using 200 Swift-UVOT bursts with matched XRT light curves, the authors identify 21 early flares consistent with reverse or internal shocks, show that simple power-law decays are often shallower in optical than X-ray because of a spectral break, and classify 30 optical plateaus. The central result is a tight anti-correlation between optical luminosity at the plateau break and rest-frame break time, log L_v,b,iso,47 = (1.57±0.80) + (-0.97±0.23) log t_b,z, with Spearman r=0.70 and p~1e-3. If this relation holds, plateau brightness and duration directly trace magnetar spin-down, with the two outlier internal-plateau bursts, GRB 060526A and GRB 060614A, pointing instead to black-hole engines. A sympathetic reader would care because it converts light-curve morphology into a diagnostic of the burst's central engine.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the luminosity–break-time relation itself: fitting optical plateaus with a broken power law yields a break time t_b and a break luminosity L_v,b,iso; in the rest frame these follow log L_v,b,iso,47 = (1.57±0.80) + (-0.97±0.23) log t_b,z. The near-unity slope is the fingerprint of a magnetar with an approximately fixed rotational energy reservoir—the same physics used to explain X-ray plateaus—while outliers flag a different engine. Supporting machinery includes the smoothly joined broken power law used to fit bumps, the F-test criteria for adding breaks, and the comparison of optical decay indices with reverse- and internal-shock predictions.

What would settle it

A dedicated campaign would obtain densely sampled optical light curves of roughly thirty plateau GRBs with known redshifts and re-fit the break time and luminosity; if the Spearman correlation drops below about 2 sigma or the slope deviates substantially from -1, the magnetar relation fails. Separately, sub-minute-cadence early optical observations would show whether the 21 steep decays have complete flares and whether the reverse-shock decay indices are real rather than artifacts of sparse sampling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is an optical plateau relation: log L_v,b,iso,47 = (1.57±0.80) + (-0.97±0.23) log t_b,z, with Spearman r=0.70 and p∼1e-3. This anti-correlation between the isotropic optical luminosity at the plateau break and the rest-frame break time is the optical counterpart of the X-ray luminosity–time relation, and the paper reads it as magnetar spin-down: a millisecond magnetar with a roughly fixed energy reservoir produces a brighter plateau that ends sooner. Four plateaus followed by steep decay are tested against the relation; two satisfy it (GRB 111209A, GRB 180618A), and two do not (GRB 060526A, GRB 060614A), which the paper attributes to black-hole central engines. Arou

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 21 very early flares were sampled densely enough for their decay indices and their correlation with X-ray and BAT flares to be judged; the paper itself says 2–3 data points are too few for two of the reverse-shock candidates, so if the sparse sampling is unrepresentative, the early-flare classification loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optical plateaus can be used alongside X-ray plateaus as a central-engine diagnostic, roughly doubling the number of bursts in which magnetar versus black-hole engines can be tested.
  • Because two internal-plateau bursts violate the relation while two satisfy it, internal plateaus do not uniquely imply magnetars; some are better explained by black-hole engines.
  • Chromatic breaks between optical and X-ray plateaus in about eighteen bursts require structured or two-component jets, showing that energy injection alone cannot explain every plateau.
  • Early optical flares that are uncorrelated with X-ray and BAT flares form a clean reverse-shock sample: twelve bursts show decay indices between 2 and 3 consistent with reverse shock in ISM or wind media.
  • The plateau relation gives a quantitative way to test whether a newly observed optical plateau is powered by continued central-engine energy injection or by a different mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the near-unity slope holds in a larger sample, the optical plateau relation could become a redshift-independent distance indicator for GRBs, in the same spirit as the X-ray Dainotti relation—though the paper does not make this claim.
  • The early-flare census is the fragile part: because several reverse-shock candidates rest on only two or three optical points, future sub-minute-cadence observations could reclassify a fraction of them as prompt-optical flares; that would not damage the plateau relation but would weaken the claimed 21-GRB decomposition.
  • The two black-hole outliers suggest a concrete next step: if internal plateaus from accreting black holes have systematically different spectral indices or prompt-to-afterglow efficiencies than magnetar plateaus, the relation could be used to separate engine classes in larger samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a statistical, morphological study of 200 Swift-UVOT GRB afterglow light curves from 2005–2018, jointly analysed with Swift-XRT and BAT data. Light curves are fitted with power-law and smoothly-broken-power-law models using F-test model selection; the resulting features are classified into early flares, bumps, plateaus, breaks, and late re-brightenings. The main claims are: (i) 21 GRBs show very early optical flares/steep decays attributable to reverse or internal shocks; (ii) optical plateaus mostly require energy injection, with four cases of internal plateau origin; (iii) Eq. (1) shows a tight anti-correlation between plateau optical luminosity and rest-frame break time, interpreted as magnetar spin-down; and (iv) early bump correlations are consistent with the afterglow onset interpretation of Liang et al. (2010).

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable large-sample, uniformly processed comparison of UVOT and XRT afterglow morphology, providing one of the most extensive optical-plateau catalogues and a direct optical analogue of the X-ray Dainotti relation. Strengths include the homogeneous Swift data processing, use of standard F-test model selection, detailed tabulation of fit parameters in the appendices, and explicit cross-checks against earlier catalogues. However, the most load-bearing quantitative claim, Eq. (1), is potentially sensitive to the adopted z=2 assumption for redshift-unknown GRBs, and the early-flare taxonomy is built partly on very sparse photometry. These issues must be fixed before the magnetar conclusion can be regarded as robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Tables 1-2, Appendix C1] The L_v,b,iso–t_b,z correlation is fitted using GRBs with at least an optical plateau, but for redshift-unknown GRBs §2.3.2 adopts z=2 for all distance-dependent quantities. Tables B2 and B4 list several plateau GRBs with z∼2 (e.g., GRB 060111B, 110319A, 130725B, 110715A), and the text says only GRB 110420A was excluded for unknown redshift, implying other z=2-assumed bursts remain in the fit. Under that assumption, a burst at true z>2 is placed at larger t_b,z and lower L, while a burst at true z<2 is placed at smaller t_b,z and higher L—exactly along the claimed L∝t_b^-1 anti-correlation. The reported slope −0.97±0.23, r=0.70, p∼1e-3 may therefore be inflated. Please refit Eq. (1) using only the 145 GRBs with measured redshifts, and/or marginalize over the plausible redshift distribution; report the known-z-only slope, correlation, and sample size. This is load-bearing for the magnetar
  2. [§4.3.1] The early-flare classification (21 GRBs; Tables 1 and 2) is based on decay indices 'approximately obtained from fitting a few early data points; therefore, errors are not given'. Appendix C1 explicitly concedes for GRB 060729A and GRB 151027A that 'it is hard to draw any conclusion with only 2-3 data points,' yet both are counted among the 12 reverse-shock candidates in Table 1. Because this census directly supports the abstract's statement about early flares and reverse/internal shock origins, the lack of uncertainties is not merely a presentation issue. Please provide error estimates where possible, or exclude/flag cases with fewer than a minimum number of points, and state how many of the 21 classifications survive a stricter sampling requirement.
  3. [§4.3] After fitting Eq. (1) to the same plateau sample, the paper uses residuals to classify individual bursts: GRB 060526A and GRB 060614A are said to favour a black-hole engine because they are outliers, while GRB 111209A and GRB 180618A are called magnetar-driven because they lie on the relation. This is partly circular, since outliers to a fitted relation do not independently test that relation or the engine model. I ask the authors to reframe this as an interpretive classification rather than a test, and to demonstrate that the fit is not driven by the very points used to define 'magnetar' cases (e.g., jackknife or outlier-removal sensitivity). A quantitative treatment of the suggested overlapping-flare contamination would also strengthen the outlier discussion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §4.2] The abstract says optical PL decay indices are shallower than X-ray ones, but §4.2 reports 3/27 GRBs with α_x ≲ α_o; please qualify the statement accordingly.
  2. [Table B4 caption] The caption says 'p-value<0.0027 indicates that the 2 break PL is preferred over the 2 break PL.' This is a typo and should read 'over the 1 break PL.'
  3. [§4.4, Table 4] The definitions of W, t_r, and t_d appear after the table is referenced; consider stating them in the table caption or before the table for readability.
  4. [Fig. 10] The figure would be much clearer with the redshift-known and redshift-assumed points marked with different symbols, and with the known-z-only fit overplotted in a distinct line style.
  5. [General] The appendix tables are dense but useful; a machine-readable version (e.g., FITS or CSV) of Tables B1–B8 would improve reproducibility and ease of use by the community.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the plateau L–t_b correlation is an empirical fit anchored to an external magnetar prediction; z=2 and sparse-flare issues are data-quality, not definitional, reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative result (Eq. 1, §4.3) is an empirical correlation between the optical plateau luminosity and rest-frame break time, fitted to plateau GRBs. The magnetar interpretation is an external theoretical consistency check: the paper cites Stratta et al. (2018) and Tang et al. (2019) for the expectation L ∝ t_b^-1, then measures −0.97±0.23. This is not circular because the theoretical prediction does not come from the fit. The z=2 assumption for redshift-unknown GRBs (§2.3.2) is an external prior based on the Swift-UVOT redshift distribution (Oates 2023; Tang et al. 2019; Gupta et al. 2022a); it can bias distance-dependent quantities and the correlation if true redshifts deviate, but it is not an input that defines the correlation, so it is a robustness/correctness concern rather than circularity. The paper explicitly concedes in App. C1 that for GRB 060729A and GRB 151027A 'it is hard to draw any conclusion with only 2-3 data points,' and Tables 1–2 state the early-flare decay indices have no quoted errors; this is a data-quality limitation in the early-flare census, not a circular reduction. Finally, using Eq. 1 to classify individual internal-plateau bursts that entered the fit is an in-sample consistency statement; outliers are explicitly identified, and the same relation is anchored to an external magnetar model, so the derivation chain does not collapse to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities; magnetars, structured/two-component jets, and off-axis jets are drawn from the cited literature and applied as interpretations. The load-bearing assumptions are the standard synchrotron closure relations, the v-band normalization without colour evolution, negligible host extinction, and z=2 for unknown redshifts. Free parameters are mainly hand-chosen analysis thresholds plus the fitted Eq. 1 coefficients.

free parameters (5)
  • SBPL smoothness parameter s = 1 or 3, chosen by hand per GRB
    Kept fixed at 1 or 3 depending on the flatness or sharpness of the bump (§4.4.1, Table B3); affects the derived peak time t_p and hence the Lorentz factor estimates.
  • Assumed redshift z=2 for 55 GRBs without measured redshift = 2
    Used to compute L_v,b, E_gamma,iso, and t_b,z; justified by the sample's average redshift (Oates 2023), but it is an assumed value that enters Eq. 1 directly, e.g. for GRB 110420A (§2.3.2).
  • F-test inclusion threshold p = 0.0027
    Hand-chosen significance level for adding breaks to PL models (§2.3.1, Fig. B3).
  • Onset-bump peak-time threshold = 3600 s (1 hour)
    Hand-chosen cutoff defining onset bumps versus late re-brightening (§4.4.1), motivated by Sari & Piran (1999) for Gamma=10 and E=1e51 erg.
  • Eq. 1 fitted slope and intercept = slope -0.97±0.23, intercept 1.57±0.80
    Linear fit to the optical plateau L_v,b-t_b,z data (r=0.70, p~1e-3); these fitted values are then used to classify individual bursts as magnetar- or black-hole-engine and to assign outlier status to GRB 060526A and GRB 060614A (§4.3, Fig. 10).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption External forward-shock synchrotron closure relations (Sari et al. 1998) map (alpha, beta) to electron index p and medium type
    Invoked throughout §3.2.4 and Tables B1-B4 to classify bursts as ISM/wind and to judge consistency with the forward-shock model.
  • domain assumption No colour evolution during the afterglow, so UVOT filter LCs can be normalized to v-band
    §2.2: 'The normalization of the LCs is only possible if there is no colour evolution.' Load-bearing for all flux densities and luminosities.
  • domain assumption Host-galaxy extinction is negligible
    §2.3.3: 'We have not applied the host extinction, and host extinction is assumed to be negligible.' Affects optical fluxes and L_v,b directly.
  • domain assumption z=2 is representative for redshift-unknown GRBs
    §2.3.2, taken from Oates (2023); enters all distance-dependent quantities.
  • domain assumption UVOT LCs reach sensitivity limits within 1-5 days, so late bumps cannot be supernovae
    §3.2: 'Any bumps observed within this time frame are inconsistent with typical expectations for supernovae.' Used to discard supernova contamination.
  • ad hoc to paper Overlapping flares contaminate the plateau luminosity and explain outliers to Eq. 1
    §4.3: 'The observed high luminosity in these cases might be attributed to the overlapping flares observed during the plateau phase.' Used post hoc to explain why some bursts violate the correlation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating Temporal Features in Swift GRB Afterglows: A Comparative Study of UVOT and XRT Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONQLABMW

@misc{pith2026250907560,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating Temporal Features in Swift GRB Afterglows: A Comparative Study of UVOT and XRT Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONQLABMW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07560}
}
read the original abstract

This study presents a statistical analysis of optical light curves (LCs) of 200 UVOT-detected GRBs from 2005 to 2018. We have categorised these LCs based on their distinct morphological features, including early flares, bumps, breaks, plateaus, etc. Additionally, to compare features across different wavelengths, we have also included XRT LCs in our sample. The early observation capability of UVOT has allowed us to identify very early flares in 21 GRBs preceding the normal decay or bump, consistent with predictions of external reverse or internal shock. The decay indices of optical LCs following a simple power-law (PL) are shallower than corresponding X-ray LCs, indicative of a spectral break between two wavelengths. Not all LCs with PL decay align with the forward shock model and require additional components such as energy injection or a structured jet. Further, plateaus in the optical LCs are primarily consistent with energy injection from the central engine to the external medium. However, in four cases, plateaus followed by steep decay may have an internal origin. The optical luminosity observed during the plateau is tightly correlated with the break time, indicative of a magnetar as their possible central engine. For LCs with early bumps, the peak position, correlations between the parameters, and observed achromaticity allowed us to constrain their origin as the onset of afterglow, off-axis jet, late re-brightening, etc. In conclusion, the ensemble of observed features is explained through diverse physical mechanisms or emissions observed from different outflow locations and, in turn, diversity among possible progenitors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07560 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time of the first optical detections plotted versus their T90. Red squares represent GRBs with the first optical detection occurring after T90, while cyan squares indicate those detected before T90 ends. The regions corresponding to T90 less than or greater than the first optical detection are shown with the red and cyan shaded regions and separated by a thin line corresponding to T90 = first optical detection. Addi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Panel (1) to (9) represents the diverse range of distinct features such as breaks, bumps, flares, plateaus, and late re-brightening observed in v-band LCs by the Swift-UVOT. The coloured square represents the observed UVOT data, and the corresponding fitted models are shown with solid coloured lines. We utilised an absorption Power-law function with multiplicative absorption components PHABS and ZPHABS to model the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The upper panel represents the decay indices 𝛼𝑜,1, 𝛼𝑜,2, and 𝛼𝑜,3 obtained from the fitting of UVOT v-band LCs with a smoothly joined broken PL model and PL models with 0-2 breaks. The decay indices are plotted against their T90 duration, and a black dashed horizontal line is plotted at zero to distinguish between the rise or decay behaviour. Similarly, the middle panel represents the decay indices 𝛼𝑥1, 𝛼𝑥2, 𝛼𝑥3, an… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On the X-axis, the spectral indices 𝛽𝑥, obtained from the fitting of X-ray spectra in 0.3-10 keV for the PC mode, are shown for all 200 GRBs in our sample. On the Y-axis, the 𝛽𝑜𝑥, obtained from the fitting of optical to X-ray SED of all 200 GRBs in our sample. The 𝛽𝑜𝑥 …
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The upper panel represents the distribution of the first (𝑡𝑜,𝑏1) and second break (𝑡𝑜,𝑏2) in the optical LCs in v-band obtained from the fitting of PL models with 1 and 2 breaks. Similarly, the lower panel represents the distribution of breaks 𝑡𝑥,𝑏1, 𝑡𝑥,𝑏2, and 𝑡𝑥,𝑏3 i…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Represents the distribution of prompt emission and X-ray afterglow properties of GRBs included in our sample. Panel 1 shows the distribution of T90 for all GRBs detected by Swift (light blue) and for 200 GRBs in our sample, depicted in pink. Panels 2 and 3 display the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Represents the flow chart of various characteristic features observed in Swift-UVOT v-band LCs and their possible origin. The flow chart consists of four main branches corresponding to the observed optical LCs exhibiting a very initial flare or steep decay (1, blue bra…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Panels (1)-(6) represent multiband Swift-UVOT LCs of GRBs, which show only a PL decay throughout, regardless of the behaviour of XRT LCs at 10 keV, i.e., X-ray LCs have different behaviours in each panel. The LCs in the different optical bands are scaled for better vis…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Represents the decay indices (𝛼x vs 𝛼o) obtained from the fitting of optical and X-ray LCs, where both show the simple PL decay. The black dashed line represents the 𝛼x = 𝛼o. show a shallow decay phase as shown in Fig. B5. Whereas, for LCs have a plateau and one or mor…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Represent the correlation between the isotropic equivalent luminosity (L𝑣,𝑏,𝑖𝑠𝑜,47 = L𝑣,𝑏,𝑖𝑠𝑜 × 10−47) calculated at break time following the plateau phase and rest frame break time (𝑡𝑏,𝑧 ) for GRBs with at least a plateau in the v-band LC (red filled circle). A linea…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Panels (1)-(6) represent multiband Swift-UVOT LCs of GRBs, which show a bump in the early optical LCs regardless of the behaviour of XRT LCs at 10 keV, i.e., X-ray LCs have different behaviours in each panel. The UVOT LCs in the different optical bands are scaled for …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Panels (1)-(6) represent the Swift-UVOT LCs in multiple filters (coloured squares) and XRT LC at 10 keV (black squares) for GRBs with the signature of late re-brightening. The fitted models to the multi-band UVOT LCs are plotted with the coloured lines as shown in the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akerlof C., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/18837 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.398..400A 398, 400

    doi:10.1038/18837 1999

  2. [2]

    A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507L..45A 507, L45

    Antonelli L. A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507L..45A 507, L45

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913062 2009

  3. [3]

    A., 1996, in Jacoby G

    Arnaud K. A., 1996, in Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p. 17

    1996

  4. [4]

    Arnaud K., Dorman B., Gordon C., 1999, XSPEC: An X-ray spectral fitting package , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:9910.005

    1999

  5. [5]

    D., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..143B 120, 143

    Barthelmy S. D., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..143B 120, 143

    doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 2005

  6. [6]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.3262B 525, 3262

    Becerra R. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.3262B 525, 3262

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2513 2023

  7. [7]

    Beniamini P., Duque R., Daigne F., Mochkovitch R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.2847B 492, 2847

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa070 2020

  8. [8]

    Berger E., et al., 2000, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/317814 , 545, 56

    doi:10.1086/317814 2000

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    D., McKee C

    Blandford R. D., McKee C. F., 1976, @doi [Physics of Fluids] 10.1063/1.861619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976PhFl...19.1130B 19, 1130

    1976 doi

  2. [10]

    L., Damerdji Y., Gendre B., Klotz A., Stratta G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/501048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...638L..71B 638, L71

    Bo \"e r M., Atteia J. L., Damerdji Y., Gendre B., Klotz A., Stratta G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/501048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...638L..71B 638, L71

    2006 doi

  3. [12]

    N., et al., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..165B 120, 165

    Burrows D. N., et al., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120..165B 120, 165

    doi

  4. [13]

    N., et al., 2005b, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1116168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Sci...309.1833B 309, 1833

    Burrows D. N., et al., 2005b, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1116168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Sci...309.1833B 309, 1833

    doi

  5. [14]

    N., et al., 2007, in Siegmund O

    Burrows D. N., et al., 2007, in Siegmund O. H., ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 6686, UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XV. p. 668607 ( @eprint arXiv 0803.1844 ), @doi 10.1117/12.735130

    2007 arXiv

  6. [15]

    S., Ramsay S

    Butler N., et al., 2012, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV. p. 844610, @doi 10.1117/12.926471

    2012 doi

  7. [16]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.3201C 519, 3201

    Caballero-Garc \' a M. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.3201C 519, 3201

    2023 doi

  8. [17]

    D., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538L.100C 538, L100

    Caballero-Garc \' a M. D., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538L.100C 538, L100

    2025 doi

  9. [18]

    Cano Z., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...568A..19C 568, A19

    2014 doi

  10. [19]

    Castro-Tirado, A. J. et al., 1999, @doi [Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.] 10.1051/aas:1999362 , 138, 583

    1999 doi

  11. [20]

    J., Hudec R., Soldán J., 1996, @doi [AIP Conference Proceedings] 10.1063/1.51596 , 384, 814

    Castro-Tirado A. J., Hudec R., Soldán J., 1996, @doi [AIP Conference Proceedings] 10.1063/1.51596 , 384, 814

    1996 doi

  12. [21]

    J., et al., 1999, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.283.5410.2069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Sci...283.2069C 283, 2069

    Castro-Tirado A. J., et al., 1999, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.283.5410.2069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Sci...283.2069C 283, 2069

    1999

  13. [22]

    J., Jel \' nek M., Mateo Sanguino T

    Castro-Tirado A. J., Jel \' nek M., Mateo Sanguino T. J., de Ugarte Postigo A., BOOTES Team 2004, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200410333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AN....325..679C 325, 679

    2004 doi

  14. [23]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A..55C 683, A55

    Castro-Tirado A. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A..55C 683, A55

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    Chen H.-W., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...723L.218C 723, L218

    2010 doi

  16. [25]

    A., Li Z.-Y., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..195C 536, 195

    Chevalier R. A., Li Z.-Y., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..195C 536, 195

    2000 doi

  17. [26]

    Cucchiara A., et al., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736....7C 736, 7

    doi

  18. [27]

    Cucchiara A., et al., 2011b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...743..154C 743, 154

    doi

  19. [28]

    A., Menci N., Brocato E., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol

    Dado S., Dar A., 2009, in Giobbi G., Tornambe A., Raimondo G., Limongi M., Antonelli L. A., Menci N., Brocato E., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 1111, Probing Stellar Populations Out to the Distant Universe: Cefalu 2008, Proceedings of the Internatio...

    2009 arXiv

  20. [29]

    G., Cardone V

    Dainotti M. G., Cardone V. F., Capozziello S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00560.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L..79D 391, L79

    2008

  21. [30]

    G., Willingale R., Capozziello S., Fabrizio Cardone V., Ostrowski M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L215 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722L.215D 722, L215

    Dainotti M. G., Willingale R., Capozziello S., Fabrizio Cardone V., Ostrowski M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L215 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722L.215D 722, L215

    2010 doi

  22. [31]

    G., et al., 2022a, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7c64 , 261, 25

    Dainotti M. G., et al., 2022a, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7c64 , 261, 25

    doi

  23. [32]

    G., Levine D., Fraija N., Warren D., Sourav S., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940..169D 940, 169

    Dainotti M. G., Levine D., Fraija N., Warren D., Sourav S., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940..169D 940, 169

    doi

  24. [33]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1527D

    Dainotti M. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1527D

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    De Pasquale M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...709L.146D 709, L146

    2010 doi

  26. [35]

    A., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469..379E 469, 379

    Evans P. A., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469..379E 469, 379

    2007 doi

  27. [37]

    Filgas R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526A.113F 526, A113

    2011 doi

  28. [38]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  29. [39]

    Gao H., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2015, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2015/192383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AdAst2015E..13G 2015, 192383

    2015 doi

  30. [40]

    Gao H., Lei W.-H., Zou Y.-C., Wu X.-F., Zhang B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NewAR..57..141G 57, 141

    2013 doi

  31. [41]

    Gao H., Wang X.-G., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Zhang B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...810..160G 810, 160

    2015 doi

  32. [42]

    Gehrels N., et al., 2004, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/422091 , 611, 1005

    2004 doi

  33. [43]

    Gehrels N., et al., 2008, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/592766 , 689, 1161

    2008 doi

  34. [44]

    Gendre B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766...30G 766, 30

    2013 doi

  35. [45]

    J., Wu X

    Geng J. J., Wu X. F., Li L., Huang Y. F., Dai Z. G., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/31 , 792, 31

    2014 doi

  36. [46]

    Ghirlanda G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...609A.112G 609, A112

    2018 doi

  37. [47]

    Ghisellini G., Ghirlanda G., Nava L., Firmani C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/515570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...658L..75G 658, L75

    2007 doi

  38. [48]

    M., Hughes P

    Granot J., Miller M., Piran T., Suen W. M., Hughes P. A., 2001, in Costa E., Frontera F., Hjorth J., eds, Gamma-ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era. p. 312 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0103038 ), @doi 10.1007/10853853_82

    2001 arXiv

  39. [49]

    E., 2002, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/340991 , 570, L61

    Granot J., Panaitescu A., Kumar P., Woosley S. E., 2002, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/340991 , 570, L61

    2002 doi

  40. [50]

    Greiner J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321284 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A..70G 560, A70

    2013 doi

  41. [51]

    arXiv:2312.16265

    Gupta R., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2312.16265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231216265G p. arXiv:2312.16265

    2023 doi arXiv

  42. [52]

    Gupta R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.4086G 505, 4086

    2021 doi

  43. [53]

    Gupta R., et al., 2022a, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-022-09865-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JApA...43...82G 43, 82

    doi

  44. [54]

    Gupta R., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.1694G 511, 1694

    doi

  45. [55]

    K., Pandey S

    Gupta R., Ror A. K., Pandey S. B., Racusin J., Moss M., Aryan A., Klingler N., Castro-Tirado A. J., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240904871G p. arXiv:2409.04871

    doi arXiv

  46. [56]

    Gupta R., et al., 2024b, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a92 , 972, 166

    doi

  47. [57]

    J., Geng J

    Hou S. J., Geng J. J., Wang K., Wu X. F., Huang Y. F., Dai Z. G., Lu J. F., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...785..113H 785, 113

    2014 doi

  48. [58]

    Japelj J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...785...84J 785, 84

    2014 doi

  49. [59]

    A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1513K 720, 1513

    Kann D. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1513K 720, 1513

    2010 doi

  50. [60]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.164K 684, A164

    Kann D. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.164K 684, A164

    2024 doi

  51. [61]

    L., Gendre B., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.4100K 137, 4100

    Klotz A., Bo \"e r M., Atteia J. L., Gendre B., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.4100K 137, 4100

    doi

  52. [62]

    L., Bo \"e r M., Coward D

    Klotz A., Gendre B., Atteia J. L., Bo \"e r M., Coward D. M., Imerito A. C., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/L18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697L..18K 697, L18

    doi

  53. [63]

    Kobayashi S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...545..807K 545, 807

    2000 doi

  54. [64]

    Kobayashi S., Zhang B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...582L..75K 582, L75

    2003 doi

  55. [65]

    Kobayashi S., Zhang B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655..973K 655, 973

    2007 doi

  56. [66]

    Kobayashi S., Piran T., Sari R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490...92K 490, 92

    1997 doi

  57. [67]

    Kobayashi S., Piran T., Sari R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..669K 513, 669

    1999 doi

  58. [68]

    Kobayashi S., Zhang B., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Burrows D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655..391K 655, 391

    2007 doi

  59. [69]

    A., Fishman G

    Kouveliotou C., Meegan C. A., Fishman G. J., Bhat N. P., Briggs M. S., Koshut T. M., Paciesas W. S., Pendleton G. N., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...413L.101K 413, L101

    1993 doi

  60. [70]

    R., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/18821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.398..389K 398, 389

    Kulkarni S. R., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/18821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.398..389K 398, 389

    1999 doi

  61. [71]

    Kumar P., Granot J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...591.1075K 591, 1075

    2003 doi

  62. [72]

    Kumar P., Panaitescu A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...541L..51K 541, L51

    2000 doi

  63. [73]

    Kumar P., Zhang B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhR...561....1K 561, 1

    2015 doi

  64. [74]

    B., Gupta R., Aryan A., Ror A

    Kumar A., Pandey S. B., Gupta R., Aryan A., Ror A. K., Sharma S., Brahme N., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2022.101889 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NewA...9701889K 97, 101889

    2022

  65. [75]

    Kumar H., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.2777K 513, 2777

    doi

  66. [76]

    Q., Reichart D

    Lamb D. Q., Reichart D. E., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536....1L 536, 1

    2000 doi

  67. [77]

    A., Sari R., Fong W.-f., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/1 , 814, 1

    Laskar T., Berger E., Margutti R., Perley D., Zauderer B. A., Sari R., Fong W.-f., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/1 , 814, 1

    2015 doi

  68. [78]

    Laskar T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacbcc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862...94L 862, 94

    2018 doi

  69. [79]

    Lazzati D., Rossi E., Covino S., Ghisellini G., Malesani D., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...396L...5L 396, L5

    2002 doi

  70. [80]

    Li L., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758...27L 758, 27

    2012 doi

  71. [81]

    W., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504684 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..351L 646, 351

    Liang E. W., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504684 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..351L 646, 351

    2006 doi

  72. [82]

    Liang E.-W., Zhang B.-B., Zhang B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670..565L 670, 565

    2007 doi

  73. [83]

    L., Zhang B., Zhang B.-B., Burrows D

    Liang E.-W., Racusin J. L., Zhang B., Zhang B.-B., Burrows D. N., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675..528L 675, 528

    2008 doi

  74. [84]

    Liang E.-W., L \"u H.-J., Hou S.-J., Zhang B.-B., Zhang B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707..328L 707, 328

    2009 doi

  75. [85]

    Liang E.-W., Yi S.-X., Zhang J., L \"u H.-J., Zhang B.-B., Zhang B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725.2209L 725, 2209

    2010 doi

  76. [86]

    pp 228--237 ( @eprint arXiv 1203.2802 ), @doi 10.1142/S2010194513011355

    Liang E.-W., Li L., Tang Q.-W., Chen J.-M., Zhang B., 2013a, in International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series. pp 228--237 ( @eprint arXiv 1203.2802 ), @doi 10.1142/S2010194513011355

    arXiv

  77. [87]

    Liang E.-W., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774...13L 774, 13

    doi

  78. [88]

    Lien A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829....7L 829, 7

    2016 doi

  79. [89]

    Lipunov V., et al., 2010, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2010/349171 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AdAst2010E..30L 2010, 349171

    2010 doi

  80. [90]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20499.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.2692L 421, 2692

    Littlejohns O. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20499.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.2692L 421, 2692

    2012

  81. [91]

    Melandri A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...607A..29M 607, A29

    2017 doi

  82. [92]

    J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482L..29M 482, L29

    M \'e sz \'a ros P., Rees M. J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482L..29M 482, L29

    1997 doi

  83. [93]

    Molinari E., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469L..13M 469, L13

    2007 doi

  84. [94]

    G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/345888 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125..984M 125, 984

    Monet D. G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/345888 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125..984M 125, 984

    2003 doi

  85. [95]

    Nappo F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A..23N 598, A23

    2017 doi

  86. [96]

    Nardini M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..29N 562, A29

    2014 doi

  87. [97]

    A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..389N 642, 389

    Nousek J. A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..389N 642, 389

    2006 doi

  88. [98]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...647.1213O 647, 1213

    O'Brien P. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...647.1213O 647, 1213

    2006 doi

  89. [99]

    Oates S., 2023, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe9030113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Univ....9..113O 9, 113

    2023 doi

  90. [102]

    R., Page M

    Oates S. R., Page M. J., De Pasquale M., Schady P., Breeveld A. A., Holland S. T., Kuin N. P. M., Marshall F. E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01331.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426L..86O 426, L86

    2012

  91. [103]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1845 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2855P 488, 2855

    Page M. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1845 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2855P 488, 2855

    2019 doi

  92. [104]

    Panaitescu A., Kumar P., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...571..779P 571, 779

    2002 doi

  93. [105]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..314P 503, 314

    Panaitescu A., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Rees M. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..314P 503, 314

    1998 doi

  94. [106]

    B., 2006, PhD thesis, Aryabhatta Institute of Observational Sciences, Nainital

    Pandey S. B., 2006, PhD thesis, Aryabhatta Institute of Observational Sciences, Nainital

    2006

  95. [107]

    B., Zheng W., 2013, in Castro-Tirado A

    Pandey S. B., Zheng W., 2013, in Castro-Tirado A. J., Gorosabel J., Park I. H., eds, EAS Publications Series Vol. 61, EAS Publications Series. pp 203--209, @doi 10.1051/eas/1361030

    2013

  96. [108]

    B., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...460..415P 460, 415

    Pandey S. B., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...460..415P 460, 415

    2006 doi

  97. [109]

    B., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504...45P 504, 45

    Pandey S. B., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504...45P 504, 45

    2009 doi

  98. [110]

    B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714..799P 714, 799

    Pandey S. B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714..799P 714, 799

    2010 doi

  99. [111]

    B., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz530 , 485, 5294

    Pandey S. B., et al., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz530 , 485, 5294

    2019 doi

  100. [112]

    Pe'er A., 2015, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2015/907321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AdAst2015E..22P 2015, 907321

    2015 doi

  101. [113]

    Peng F., K \"o nigl A., Granot J., 2005, @doi [Nuovo Cimento C Geophysics Space Physics C] 10.1393/ncc/i2005-10078-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005NCimC..28..439P 28, 439

    2005 doi

  102. [114]

    A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141...36P 141, 36

    Perley D. A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....141...36P 141, 36

    2011 doi

  103. [115]

    Perna R., Aguirre A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...543...56P 543, 56

    2000 doi

  104. [117]

    L., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature07270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Natur.455..183R 455, 183

    Racusin J. L., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature07270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Natur.455..183R 455, 183

    2008 doi

  105. [118]

    J., Meszaros P., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258P..41R 258, 41

    Rees M. J., Meszaros P., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258P..41R 258, 41

    1992 doi

  106. [119]

    J., Meszaros P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...430L..93R 430, L93

    Rees M. J., Meszaros P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...430L..93R 430, L93

    1994 doi

  107. [120]

    Roming P. W. A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SSRv..120...95R 120, 95

    2005 doi

  108. [121]

    Roming P. W. A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...651..985R 651, 985

    2006 doi

  109. [122]

    Roming P. W. A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/163 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690..163R 690, 163

    2009 doi

  110. [123]

    K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942...34R 942, 34

    Ror A. K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942...34R 942, 34

    2023 doi

  111. [124]

    K., Pandey S

    Ror A. K., Pandey S. B., Aryan A., Kumar S., Castro-Tirado A. J., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13391 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240913391R p. arXiv:2409.13391

    doi arXiv

  112. [125]

    Ror A. K., Bhushan Pandey S., Gupta R., Aryan A., 2024b, @doi [Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege] 10.25518/0037-9565.11848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024BSRSL..93..709R 93, 709

  113. [126]

    K., Gupta R., Aryan A., Pandey S

    Ror A. K., Gupta R., Aryan A., Pandey S. B., Oates S. R., Castro-Tirado A. J., Kumar S., 2024c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971..163R 971, 163

    doi

  114. [127]

    S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702..489R 702, 489

    Rykoff E. S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702..489R 702, 489

    2009 doi

  115. [128]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac08e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861...48S 861, 48

    Sadovnichy V. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac08e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861...48S 861, 48

    2018 doi

  116. [129]

    S \'a nchez-Ram \' rez R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A...3S 692, A3

    2024 doi

  117. [130]

    Sari R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...489L..37S 489, L37

    1997 doi

  118. [131]

    Sari R., Piran T., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309835 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455L.143S 455, L143

    1995 doi

  119. [132]

    Sari R., Piran T., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...520..641S 520, 641

    1999 doi

  120. [133]

    Sari R., Piran T., Narayan R., 1998, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/311269 , 497, L17–L20

    1998 doi

  121. [134]

    P., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312109 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...519L..17S 519, L17

    Sari R., Piran T., Halpern J. P., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312109 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...519L..17S 519, L17

    1999 doi

  122. [135]

    Schady P., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11592.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377..273S 377, 273

    2007

  123. [137]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..103S 737, 103

    2011 doi

  124. [138]

    Shrestha M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1584S 516, 1584

    2022 doi

  125. [139]

    Starling R. L. C., et al., 2009, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15443.x , 400, 90

    2009

  126. [140]

    G., Dall'Osso S., Hernandez X., De Cesare G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869..155S 869, 155

    Stratta G., Dainotti M. G., Dall'Osso S., Hernandez X., De Cesare G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869..155S 869, 155

    2018 doi

  127. [141]

    A., Roming P

    Swenson C. A., Roming P. W. A., De Pasquale M., Oates S. R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774....2S 774, 2

    2013 doi

  128. [142]

    Tagliaferri G., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03934 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.436..985T 436, 985

    2005 doi

  129. [143]

    Tang C.-H., Huang Y.-F., Geng J.-J., Zhang Z.-B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4711 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..245....1T 245, 1

    2019 doi

  130. [144]

    Troja E., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..599T 665, 599

    2007 doi

  131. [145]

    V., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/267.4.1035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.267.1035U 267, 1035

    Usov V. V., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/267.4.1035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.267.1035U 267, 1035

    1994 doi

  132. [146]

    Varela K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589A..37V 589, A37

    2016 doi

  133. [147]

    T., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03515 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.435..178V 435, 178

    Vestrand W. T., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03515 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.435..178V 435, 178

    2005 doi

  134. [148]

    Wang X.-G., Li L., Yang Y.-P., Luo J.-W., Zhang B., Lin D.-B., Liang E.-W., Qin S.-M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d1d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...894L..22W 894, L22

    2020 doi

  135. [149]

    M., et al., 2016, in Evans C

    Watson A. M., et al., 2016, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. p. 99085O ( @eprint arXiv 1606.00690 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2233000

    2016 arXiv

  136. [150]

    Willingale R., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...662.1093W 662, 1093

    2007 doi

  137. [151]

    E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..273W 405, 273

    Woosley S. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..273W 405, 273

    1993 doi

  138. [152]

    Xie L., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896....4X 896, 4

    2020 doi

  139. [153]

    Xin L.-P., Wei J.-Y., Qiu Y.-L., Deng J.-S., Wang J., Han X.-H., 2016a, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/16/1/012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RAA....16...12X 16, 12

    doi

  140. [154]

    Xin L.-P., et al., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817..152X 817, 152

    doi

  141. [155]

    Yi F., Haibo Y., Ruoyi Z., Jian G., Shuai X., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2463 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.2701Y 525, 2701

    2023 doi

  142. [156]

    G., Margutti R., Oates S., Chincarini G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..12Z 557, A12

    Zaninoni E., Bernardini M. G., Margutti R., Oates S., Chincarini G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..12Z 557, A12

    2013 doi

  143. [157]

    A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637..889Z 637, 889

    Zeh A., Klose S., Kann D. A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637..889Z 637, 889

    2006 doi

  144. [158]

    Zhang B., 2007, @doi [Advances in Space Research] 10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AdSpR..40.1186Z 40, 1186

    2007 doi

  145. [159]

    Zhang B., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320255 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...552L..35Z 552, L35

    2001 doi

  146. [160]

    Zhang B., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566..712Z 566, 712

    2002 doi

  147. [161]

    Z., Dyks J., Kobayashi S., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Burrows D

    Zhang B., Fan Y. Z., Dyks J., Kobayashi S., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Burrows D. N., Nousek J. A., Gehrels N., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..354Z 642, 354

    2006 doi

  148. [162]

    Zhang B.-B., Liang E.-W., Zhang B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519548 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...666.1002Z 666, 1002

    2007 doi

  149. [163]

    Zhang B.-B., Zhang B., Liang E.-W., Wang X.-Y., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/L10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690L..10Z 690, L10

    2009 doi

  150. [164]

    B., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0309-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2...69Z 2, 69

    Zhang B. B., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0309-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2...69Z 2, 69

    2018 doi

  151. [165]

    Zhao L., Liu L., Gao H., Lan L., Lei W., Xie W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8f91 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896...42Z 896, 42

    2020 doi

  152. [166]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.