Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.4443 v2 pith:OQ45OWYG submitted 2014-07-16 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords complexitybanditfixed-confidencefixed-budgetlemmamodelssettingbest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The stochastic multi-armed bandit model is a simple abstraction that has proven useful in many different contexts in statistics and machine learning. Whereas the achievable limit in terms of regret minimization is now well known, our aim is to contribute to a better understanding of the performance in terms of identifying the m best arms. We introduce generic notions of complexity for the two dominant frameworks considered in the literature: fixed-budget and fixed-confidence settings. In the fixed-confidence setting, we provide the first known distribution-dependent lower bound on the complexity that involves information-theoretic quantities and holds when m is larger than 1 under general assumptions. In the specific case of two armed-bandits, we derive refined lower bounds in both the fixed-confidence and fixed-budget settings, along with matching algorithms for Gaussian and Bernoulli bandit models. These results show in particular that the complexity of the fixed-budget setting may be smaller than the complexity of the fixed-confidence setting, contradicting the familiar behavior observed when testing fully specified alternatives. In addition, we also provide improved sequential stopping rules that have guaranteed error probabilities and shorter average running times. The proofs rely on two technical results that are of independent interest : a deviation lemma for self-normalized sums (Lemma 19) and a novel change of measure inequality for bandit models (Lemma 1).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Experiments Under Data Sparse Settings: Applications for Educational Platforms

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    WAPTS reweights Thompson Sampling draws by empirical success rate to favor high-performing treatments, claiming faster convergence to near-optimal alternatives in sparse educational experiments.

Pith tools