Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RJ-plots: An improved method to classify structures objectively

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.07509 v1 pith:ORUFIVMN submitted 2022-08-16 astro-ph.GA

RJ-plots: An improved method to classify structures objectively

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords structuresrj-plotsclassificationautomatedcorrelationimprovedmethodmorphological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The interstellar medium is highly structured, presenting a range of morphologies across spatial scales. The large data sets resulting from observational surveys and state-of-the-art simulations studying these hierarchical structures means that identification and classification must be done in an automated fashion to be efficient. Here we present RJ-plots, an improved version of the automated morphological classification technique J-plots developed by Jaffa et al. (2018). This method allows clear distinctions between quasi-circular/elongated structures and centrally over/under-dense structures. We use the recent morphological SEDIGISM catalogue of Neralwar et al. (2022) to show the improvement in classification resulting from RJ-plots, especially for ring-like and concentrated cloud types. We also find a strong correlation between the central concentration of a structure and its star formation efficiency and dense gas fraction, as well as a lack of correlation with elongation. Furthermore, we use the accreting filament simulations of Clarke et al. (2020) to highlight a multi-scale application of RJ-plots, finding that while spherical structures become more common at smaller scales they are never the dominant structure down to $r\sim0.03$ pc.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.