REVIEW 3 cited by
Pareto optimal proxy metrics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
North star metrics and online experimentation play a central role in how technology companies improve their products. In many practical settings, however, evaluating experiments based on the north star metric directly can be difficult. The two most significant issues are 1) low sensitivity of the north star metric and 2) differences between the short-term and long-term impact on the north star metric. A common solution is to rely on proxy metrics rather than the north star in experiment evaluation and launch decisions. Existing literature on proxy metrics concentrates mainly on the estimation of the long-term impact from short-term experimental data. In this paper, instead, we focus on the trade-off between the estimation of the long-term impact and the sensitivity in the short term. In particular, we propose the Pareto optimal proxy metrics method, which simultaneously optimizes prediction accuracy and sensitivity. In addition, we give an efficient multi-objective optimization algorithm that outperforms standard methods. We applied our methodology to experiments from a large industrial recommendation system, and found proxy metrics that are eight times more sensitive than the north star and consistently moved in the same direction, increasing the velocity and the quality of the decisions to launch new features.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Accelerating A/B-Tests with Counterfactual Estimation: Reducing Variance through Policy Overlap
Reframing A/B assignment as a mixture policy and applying Δ-off-policy estimators yields an unbiased ATE estimator with variance provably no larger than difference-in-means whenever the tested policies overlap.
-
Evaluating Decision Rules Across Many Weak Experiments
A cross-validation estimator that splits each A/B test's units eliminates the winner's-curse bias in evaluating decision rules across many weak experiments, with theory, simulations, and a Netflix case study reporting...
-
proxymate: Diagnosis and Adjustment of Proxy Estimates for Reliable Inference
A four-level diagnostic-to-adjustment framework (representativity, unit, estimate, domain) plus open-source package maps proxy failures to corrections like IW, PPI, calibration, and meta-analytic recalibration, with M...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.