Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 124 references

Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports outcomes from the inaugural bridge event on AI for scholarly communication and argues that the field's fragmentation, not missing technology, is what slows progress toward reliable, queryable scholarly knowledge bases.

desk verdict A competent but methodologically opaque synthesis of the AI4SC Bridge event: useful as an orientation to the AI-for-scholarly-communication tool landscape, but its claims about community-wide priorities rest on an unreported discussion methodology and unsourced statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02581 v2 pith:OUFPYN4I submitted 2025-08-27 cs.DL cs.AI

Azanzi Jiomekong , Hande Küçük McGinty , Keith G. Mills , Allard Oelen , Enayat Rajabi , Harry McElroy , Antrea Christou , Anmol Saini
show 8 more authors
Janice Anta Zebaze Hannah Kim Anna M. Jacyszyn Gollam Rabby Dirk Betz Claudia Biniossek Sanju Tiwari Sören Auer
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DLcs.AI
keywords AIforscholarlycommunicationknowledgegraphsliteraturereviewautomationresearchlifecycleethicsgenerativeinextractionsustainabledevelopmentgoals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper wants to establish that AI for scholarly communication is mature enough to be classified and coordinated, and that the main obstacle to reliable, queryable scholarly knowledge is the lack of exchange among research communities working on similar tools. It reports a two-day community workshop that brought together students, practitioners, and AI researchers to identify shared challenges and future directions. Grounded in that event, it proposes a classification of AI systems by research-lifecycle stage, a set of evaluation criteria, and a five-star ethics model for responsible use. If the paper is right, organizing the community around shared challenges and AI-enabled infrastructures would accelerate progress and help researchers cope with millions of new papers each year.

What carries the argument

The paper's load-bearing organizer is the research-lifecycle classification: it divides AI systems according to where they act in scholarly work, from literature discovery and knowledge acquisition to generation, peer review, publication, and presentation. This taxonomy gives the field a shared vocabulary for comparing tools and anticipating their limits. A second mechanism is the five-star ethics framework, adapted from open-data star ratings, which structures responsible use into transparency, accountability, originality and plagiarism, fabrication and hallucination risks, and preservation of human skill. Together, the lifecycle map and ethics ladder carry the argument that progress is les

What would settle it

A systematic, large-scale survey of researchers across disciplines that found most already use AI tools across all lifecycle stages and report active cross-community collaboration would contradict the fragmentation premise. Likewise, a follow-up assessment showing no new cross-community collaborations or shared infrastructure emerging from the workshop would undermine the claim that such events accelerate integration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the disparate efforts to apply AI to scholarly knowledge extraction, organization, generation, and review can be seen as one landscape with a common structure. The paper classifies AI systems into four families: literature discovery and knowledge extraction/organization; knowledge generation and editing; peer review, publication, and post-publication; and slide presentation. It then maps these systems onto use in education, food science, physics, environment, economics, and law, and argues that evaluation should combine technical metrics, operational criteria, and social concerns such as fairness and transparency. The central normative claim is

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions depend on the workshop attendees and their world-café discussions being representative of the broader scholarly AI community; if they are not, the identified shared challenges and future directions may reflect one group's perspective rather than field-level priorities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers, publishers, institutions, and policymakers can use the lifecycle classification to select tools and anticipate where AI will fail or need oversight.
  • A shared vocabulary makes it possible to compare tools across communities and to build integrated pipelines instead of disjoint point solutions.
  • Evaluation frameworks that combine accuracy, scalability, fairness, and transparency give journals and reviewers concrete criteria for AI-assisted work.
  • Mapping research impact to the Sustainable Development Goals, with AI assistance, could make scholarly output more actionable for policy.
  • Human-in-the-loop validation and clear accountability rules remain necessary even as AI becomes more autonomous in generating hypotheses, drafts, and reviews.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification implies a natural benchmark structure: if the field adopted lifecycle-stage tasks, tool evaluations could be standardized within each stage, which the paper does not explicitly propose.
  • The five-star ethics model could be operationalized as a badge or rating for AI tools in scholarly workflows, parallel to reproducibility badges in computing venues.
  • The paper's premise suggests a testable prediction: communities that share knowledge-graph infrastructure will produce more integrated scholarly knowledge systems than those that keep building domain-specific silos; comparing collaboration networks over the next few years could settle this.
  • The call for automated SDG tagging points to a concrete NLP task—classifying papers by SDG relevance—that the paper notes is currently manual.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a community perspective/report on the AAAI 2025 Bridge on AI for Scholarly Communication (AI4SC). It proposes a four-category taxonomy of AI systems for scholarly communication (literature search/discovery, knowledge generation, peer review/publication, slide presentation), surveys applications across several disciplines and their links to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, discusses evaluation frameworks and ethical considerations, and enumerates opportunities and challenges. The abstract and introduction frame the paper as reporting findings from the Bridge event's technical talks and world-café discussions, with the goal of identifying shared challenges and shaping future research directions.

Significance. If the event synthesis is reliable, the paper provides a useful agenda-setting document for the AI4SC community: it assembles a broad catalog of AI tools and issues, offers a simple organizing taxonomy, and connects scholarly communication to SDG impact in a way that could inform future workshops and research priorities. The paper is best read as a position/report rather than an empirical study. Its main value is synthetic and organizational, and the extensive reference list will help newcomers to the area. However, the paper's central claim—that it reports community-level shared challenges and future directions—depends on undocumented event synthesis, so the significance is contingent on the authors supplying the missing methodological grounding.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 1 and Section 5] The paper claims to report 'findings, results of discussions, and suggested future directions' from the AI4SC Bridge event, but no methodology is provided: there is no participant count, selection criteria, demographic breakdown, description of how world-café sessions were recorded/transcribed, coding scheme, or reliability check. Section 5 then generalizes to field-level conclusions ('AI is profoundly reshaping the scholarly landscape'). Without access to the event's raw outputs or an explicit synthesis method, the claimed community consensus cannot be distinguished from author selection. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim and needs to be addressed, e.g., by adding a methodology/appendix and by softening or carefully qualifying the generalization statements.
  2. [Section 1 and Section 4.6] The quantitative claims 'currently, 3 million' papers published per year and 'more than 200 million' papers already published are stated without any citation in both Section 1 and Section 4.6. These numbers are presented as context for the research question, and while they are plausible, they should be supported by an authoritative source (e.g., a bibliometric database or STM report) or removed/rephrased as approximate estimates.
  3. [Section 2, Fig. 2] The four-category taxonomy (literature discovery, knowledge generation, peer review, slide presentation) is asserted as 'roughly classified' without validation. It is unclear whether this taxonomy emerged from the Bridge event discussions or is the authors' own framing. In particular, the inclusion of 'slide presentation' as a top-level category alongside much broader categories seems idiosyncratic and needs justification. The authors should clarify the provenance of the taxonomy and discuss whether the categories are intended to be exhaustive and how they were derived.
  4. [Section 5] The conclusion presents the event outcomes as if they were field-level results, e.g., 'AI is profoundly reshaping the scholarly landscape' and lists of 'shared challenges' and 'future directions.' Given the undocumented convenience sample described in Section 1, these statements overreach. The authors should either provide evidence of representativeness or explicitly frame the findings as 'challenges and directions identified by participants at the AI4SC Bridge event' rather than as community-wide conclusions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 3] The text and figure caption refer to 'five-start ethics'; this should be 'five-star ethics' throughout.
  2. [Section 3.1.6] There is a typo: 'impact onc85 SDGs' should be 'impact on SDGs'.
  3. [References] References [63] and [64] are the same paper (Linked Open Literature Review using the ORKG); one should be removed. Also, reference [65] is cited twice in Section 3.1.2 as '[65, 65]'.
  4. [Section 2.1.3] The phrase 'for knowledge scholarly knowledge organization' is garbled; it should read 'for scholarly knowledge organization'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; self-citations are illustrative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This manuscript is a qualitative report of the AAAI 2025 AI4SC Bridge event. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, or falsifiable predictions, so none of the mathematical circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation) apply. The closest potential issue is the repeated citation of the authors' own ORKG work (e.g., [8], [63], [66]) when describing scholarly knowledge graphs and the 'ORKG observatory'. These citations are used as examples of existing systems, not as evidence that the paper's central conclusions—shared challenges, future directions, the value of cross-disciplinary dialogue—are true. The central claim is an interpretation of event discussions; even if one questions whether the participant sample is representative, that is a methodological and generalizability limitation, not a circular reduction to the paper's inputs. Because the event's synthesis is not independently checkable, the evidentiary status is weak, but circularity requires the conclusion to be equivalent to the premise by construction or via a self-citation chain. No such equivalence is exhibited, so the score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It rests on the representativeness of the AAAI 2025 AI4SC Bridge event and on the completeness of its self-devised taxonomy.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The AAAI 2025 AI4SC Bridge event participants and world café discussions are representative of the broader scholarly AI community.
    The paper generalizes 'shared challenges' and 'future directions' from this event to the whole community (Sections 1 and 5), without sampling or evidence that non-attendees hold similar views.
  • ad hoc to paper The proposed four-category classification of AI systems (literature search/discovery, knowledge generation, peer review, slide presentation) is exhaustive and useful.
    Section 2 asserts this taxonomy without a systematic literature review or comparison to existing taxonomies, so it is introduced for this paper's structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUFPYN4I

@misc{pith2026250902581,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUFPYN4I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02581}
}
read the original abstract

Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions. Meanwhile, the rapid increase in scholarly publications across disciplines has made it increasingly difficult to stay current, further underscoring the need for scalable, AI-enabled approaches to structuring and synthesizing scholarly knowledge. Various research communities have begun addressing this challenge independently, developing tools and frameworks aimed at building reliable, dynamic, and queryable scholarly knowledge bases. However, limited interaction across these communities has hindered the exchange of methods, models, and best practices, slowing progress toward more integrated solutions. This manuscript identifies ways to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue, identify shared challenges, categorize new collaboration and shape future research directions in scholarly knowledge and organization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02581 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the research life cycle. For a given problem, scientists [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Holistic view of the classification of artificial intelligence for scholarly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the five stars ethics on AI for scholarly communication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ACM: Artifact review and badging - current (August 2020), https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/ artifact-review-and-badging-current , [Online; posted 24-August- 2020]

    2020

  2. [2]

    In: Advances in sustainable materials and resilient infrastructure, pp

    Addagada, L., Ramesh, S.T., Ratha, D.N., Gandhimathi, R., Rout, P.R.: The role of civil engineering in achieving un sustainable development goals. In: Advances in sustainable materials and resilient infrastructure, pp. 373–

  3. [3]

    In: E3S Web of Conferences

    Alazzai, W.K., Abood, B.S.Z., Al-Jawahry, H.M., Obaid, M.K.: Precision farming: the power of ai and iot technologies. In: E3S Web of Conferences. vol. 491, p. 04006. EDP Sciences (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    quality education

    AlSagri, H.S., Sohail, S.S.: Evaluating the role of artificial intelligence in sustainable development goals with an emphasis on “quality education”. Discover Sustainability 5(1), 1–26 (2024) 28

    2024

  5. [5]

    IEEE Jour- nal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18(4), 1261–1271 (2014)

    Anthimopoulos, M.M., Gianola, L., Scarnato, L., Diem, P., Mougiakakou, S.G.: A food recognition system for diabetic pa- tients based on an optimized bag-of-features model. IEEE Jour- nal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18(4), 1261–1271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2308928

    work page arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3923923 (September 2015), a/RES/70/1

    Assembly, U.N.G.: Transforming our world : the 2030 agenda for sus- tainable development: resolution / adopted by the general assembly. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3923923 (September 2015), a/RES/70/1

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    In: Handbook on Neurosymbolic AI and Knowledge Graphs, pp

    Auer, S., D’Souza, J., Farfar, K.E., Jaradeh, M.Y., Jiomekong, A., Karras, O., Oelen, A., Snyder, L., Stocker, M., Vogt, L.: Open research knowledge graph: a large-scale neuro-symbolic knowledge organization system. In: Handbook on Neurosymbolic AI and Knowledge Graphs, pp. 385–420. IOS Press (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    BIBLIOTHEK – Forschung und Praxis (2020)

    Auer, S., Oelen, A., Haris, M., Stocker, M., D’Souza, J., Eddine Farfar, K., Vogt, L., Prinz, M., Wiens, V., Jaradeh, M.Y.: Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs. BIBLIOTHEK – Forschung und Praxis (2020). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/22049

    work page doi:10.18452/22049 2020

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    Ieee Access 7, 9324–9339 (2019)

    Bai, X., Wang, M., Lee, I., Yang, Z., Kong, X., Xia, F.: Scientific paper recommendation: A survey. Ieee Access 7, 9324–9339 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 39(5), 6222–6234 (2024)

    Bai, Y., Camal, S., Michiorri, A.: News and load: A quantitative ex- ploration of natural language processing applications for forecasting day- ahead electricity system demand. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 39(5), 6222–6234 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6(5), 1–9 (2022)

    Bakr, M., Abdel-Gaber, S., Nasr, M., Hazman, M.: Densenet based model for plant diseases diagnosis. European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6(5), 1–9 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 27(2), 96–106 (2020)

    Bali Swain, R., Yang-Wallentin, F.: Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 27(2), 96–106 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05746 (2024)

    Banerjee, S., Agarwal, A., Singla, S.: Llms will always hallucinate, and we need to live with this. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05746 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023 (2023)

    Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., et al.: A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of chatgpt on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Natural Language Engineering 28(6), 683–732 (2022) 29

    Baradaran, R., Ghiasi, R., Amirkhani, H.: A survey on machine reading comprehension systems. Natural Language Engineering 28(6), 683–732 (2022) 29

    2022

  8. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10676 (2019)

    Beltagy, I., Lo, K., Cohan, A.: Scibert: A pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10676 (2019)

    1903 arXiv

  9. [17]

    BMC medical research methodology 25(1), 75 (2025)

    Bernard, N., Sagawa Jr, Y., Bier, N., Lihoreau, T., Pazart, L., Tannou, T.: Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit. BMC medical research methodology 25(1), 75 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    In: 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Bettadapura, V., Thomaz, E., Parnami, A., Abowd, G.D., Essa, I.: Lever- aging context to support automated food recognition in restaurants. In: 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. pp. 580–587. IEEE (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P., Vaughn, J.W.: Introducing the neurips 2021 paper check- list (March 2021), https://neuripsconf.medium.com/ introducing-the-neurips-2021-paper-checklist-3220d6df500b , [Online; posted 26-March-2021]

    2021

  12. [20]

    org/abs/2402.08565

    Bolanos, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: Opportunities and challenges (2024), https://arxiv. org/abs/2402.08565

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Li- braries

    Brack, A., Hoppe, A., Buscherm¨ ohle, P., Ewerth, R.: Cross-domain multi- task learning for sequential sentence classification in research papers. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Li- braries. pp. 1–13 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    In: International Con- ference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries

    Brack, A., Hoppe, A., Stocker, M., Auer, S., Ewerth, R.: Requirements analysis for an open research knowledge graph. In: International Con- ference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. pp. 3–18. Springer (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Brack, A., Hoppe, A., Stocker, M., Auer, S., Ewerth, R.: Analysing the requirements for an open research knowledge graph: Use cases, quality requirements, and construction strategies. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 23(1), 33–55 (mar 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-021-00306-x

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    In: 2022 7th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES)

    Brintha, N.C., Nagaraj, P., Tejasri, A., Durga, B.V., Teja, M.T., Venkata Pavan Kumar, M.N.: A food recommendation system for predictive dia- betic patients using ann and cnn. In: 2022 7th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). pp. 1364–1371...

    2022

  17. [25]

    The American Economist 69(1), 80– 87 (2024)

    Buchanan, J., Hill, S., Shapoval, O.: Chatgpt hallucinates non-existent citations: Evidence from economics. The American Economist 69(1), 80– 87 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345231218454

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIG- PLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems

    Cai, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, L.: Optimus: towards optimal layer-fusion on deep learning processors. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIG- PLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems. pp. 67–79 (2021) 30

    2021

  19. [27]

    Semantic Web 4(3), 341–348 (2013)

    Caracciolo, C., Stellato, A., Morshed, A., Johannsen, G., Rajbhandari, S., Jaques, Y., Keizer, J.: The agrovoc linked dataset. Semantic Web 4(3), 341–348 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 103(1), 63 (2015)

    Champieux, R.: Plumx. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 103(1), 63 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    J Med Internet Res 26, e53164 (May 2024)

    Chelli, M., Descamps, J., Lavou´ e, V., Trojani, C., Azar, M., Deckert, M., Raynier, J.L., Clowez, G., Boileau, P., Ruetsch-Chelli, C.: Hallucina- tion rates and reference accuracy of chatgpt and bard for systematic re- views: Comparative analysis. J Med Internet Res 26, e5316...

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15465 (2025)

    Chen, R., Mills, K.G., Niu, D.: Fp4dit: Towards effective floating point quantization for diffusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15465 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international confer- ence on web search and data mining

    Chen, Y., Subburathinam, A., Chen, C.H., Zaki, M.J.: Personalized food recommendation as constrained question answering over a large-scale food knowledge graph. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international confer- ence on web search and data mining. pp. 544–552 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association 44(2), 43 (2023)

    Cole, V., Boutet, M.: Researchrabbit. The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association 44(2), 43 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    CSPaper: Icml 2025 position paper: Why ai peer review is crumbling and what we can do about it (May 2025), https://cspaper.org/topic/75/ icml-2025-position-paper-why-ai-peer-review-is-crumbling-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/ 2

    2025

  26. [34]

    Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35(4), 373– 388 (2020)

    Deng, J., Lu, Y., Lee, V.C.S.: Concrete crack detection with handwrit- ing script interferences using faster region-based convolutional neural net- work. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35(4), 373– 388 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022: 21st In- ternational Semantic Web Conference, Virtual Event, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings

    Dess ´ ı, D., Osborne, F., Reforgiato Recupero, D., Buscaldi, D., Motta, E.: Cs-kg: A large-scale knowledge graph of research entities and claims in computer science. In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022: 21st In- ternational Semantic Web Conference, Virtual Event, October 23–27, ...

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    BMJ open 13(7), e072254 (2023)

    van Dijk, S.H., Brusse-Keizer, M.G., Bucs´ an, C.C., van der Palen, J., Doggen, C.J., Lenferink, A.: Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used. BMJ open 13(7), e072254 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 55, 100715 (2024) 31

    Dong, M.M., Stratopoulos, T.C., Wang, V.X.: A scoping review of chatgpt research in accounting and finance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 55, 100715 (2024) 31

    2024

  30. [38]

    npj Science of Food 2(1), 23 (2018)

    Dooley, D.M., Griffiths, E.J., Gosal, G.S., Buttigieg, P.L., Hoehndorf, R., Lange, M.C., Schriml, L.M., Brinkman, F.S., Hsiao, W.W.: Foodon: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration. npj Science of Food 2(1), 23 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024)

    Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Yang, A., Fan, A., et al.: The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Journal of King Saud University-Science 36(9), 103409 (2024)

    Durgun, Y.: Real-time water quality monitoring using ai-enabled sensors: Detection of contaminants and uv disinfection analysis in smart urban water systems. Journal of King Saud University-Science 36(9), 103409 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    In: International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries

    D’Souza, J., Auer, S.: Computer science named entity recognition in the open research knowledge graph. In: International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries. pp. 35–45. Springer (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Eger, S., Cao, Y., D’Souza, J., Geiger, A., Greisinger, C., Gross, S., Hou, Y., Krenn, B., Lauscher, A., Li, Y., Lin, C., Moosavi, N.S., Zhao, W., Miller, T.: Transforming science with large language models: A survey on ai-assisted scientific discovery, experimentation, conten...

    2025

  35. [43]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2245683

    Enqvist, L.: ‘human oversight’ in the eu artificial intelligence act: what, when and by whom? Law, Innovation and Technology 15(2), 508–535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2245683

    2023

  36. [44]

    Semantic web 1(1-2), 89–96 (2010)

    Fazzinga, B., Lukasiewicz, T.: Semantic search on the web. Semantic web 1(1-2), 89–96 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22167 (2025)

    Feng, W., Yang, C., Qin, H., Li, X., Wang, Y., An, Z., Huang, L., Diao, B., Zhao, Z., Xu, Y., et al.: Q-vdit: Towards accurate quantization and distillation of video-generation diffusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22167 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 23(3), 157–214 (2016)

    Fisher, I.E., Garnsey, M.R., Hughes, M.E.: Natural language processing in accounting, auditing and finance: A synthesis of the literature with a roadmap for future research. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 23(3), 157–214 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Smart Mate- rials and Structures 29(7), 074001 (2020)

    Fu, J., Lai, J., Yang, Z., Bai, J., Yu, M.: Fuzzy-neural network control for a magnetorheological elastomer vibration isolation system. Smart Mate- rials and Structures 29(7), 074001 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07640 (2018) 32

    Gardner, M., Grus, J., Neumann, M., Tafjord, O., Dasigi, P., Liu, N., Peters, M., Schmitz, M., Zettlemoyer, L.: Allennlp: A deep semantic natural language processing platform. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07640 (2018) 32

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20325 (2025)

    Ghasemabadi, A., Mills, K.G., Li, B., Niu, D.: Guided by gut: Effi- cient test-time scaling with reinforced intrinsic confidence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20325 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18864 (2025)

    Gottweis, J., Weng, W.H., Daryin, A., Tu, T., Palepu, A., Sirkovic, P., Myaskovsky, A., Weissenberger, F., Rong, K., Tanno, R., et al.: Towards an ai co-scientist. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18864 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Engineering Structures 143, 152–168 (2017)

    Greco, A., Cannizzaro, F., Pluchino, A.: Seismic collapse prediction of frame structures by means of genetic algorithms. Engineering Structures 143, 152–168 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Greiner-Petter, A.: Semantification of Mathematical LaTeX, pp. 57–93. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40473-4 3

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    In: Proceed- ings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web

    Guha, R., McCool, R., Miller, E.: Semantic search. In: Proceed- ings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. p. 700–709. WWW ’03, Association for Computing Machinery (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/775152.775250

    2003

  46. [54]

    BMC Medical Education 22(1), 830 (2022)

    Han, J.W., Park, J., Lee, H.: Analysis of the effect of an artificial intel- ligence chatbot educational program on non-face-to-face classes: a quasi- experimental study. BMC Medical Education 22(1), 830 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    A Feed the Future Global Supporting Seed Systems for Devel- opment activity report (2023)

    Hassena, M., Alemu, D., Dey, B.: Quality declared seed mechanism in ethiopia. A Feed the Future Global Supporting Seed Systems for Devel- opment activity report (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    In: International Semantic Web Conference

    Haussmann, S., Seneviratne, O., Chen, Y., Ne’eman, Y., Codella, J., Chen, C.H., McGuinness, D.L., Zaki, M.J.: Foodkg: a semantics-driven knowledge graph for food recommendation. In: International Semantic Web Conference. pp. 146–162. Springer (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Journal of Docu- mentation 81(7), 18–30 (2024)

    Heikkil¨ a, J.T.: Human intelligence versus artificial intelligence in classi- fying economics research articles: exploratory evidence. Journal of Docu- mentation 81(7), 18–30 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Ileri, A.M., Rangarajan, N., Cannell, J., McGinty, H.: Vel: A formally verified reasoner for el++ description logic (2024), https://arxiv.org/ abs/2412.08739

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cureus 16(3) (2024)

    Jhajj, K.S., Jindal, P., Kaur, K.: Use of artificial intelligence tools for research by medical students: a narrative review. Cureus 16(3) (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57(1), e303 (2020) 33

    Jiang, M., D’Souza, J., Auer, S., Downie, J.S.: Targeting precision: A hybrid scientific relation extraction pipeline for improved scholarly knowl- edge organization. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57(1), e303 (2020) 33

    2020

  53. [61]

    https://orkg.org/review/R640411 (2022), [Online; accessed 2023-09- 16]

    Jiomekong, A.: Food information processing. https://orkg.org/review/R640411 (2022), [Online; accessed 2023-09- 16]

    2022

  54. [62]

    https://orkg.org/review/R609854 (2023)

    Jiomekong, A.: Collecting food informa- tion. https://orkg.org/review/R609854 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48366/r609854, [Online; accessed 2023-09-16]

    2023 doi

  55. [64]

    In: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024

    Jiomekong, A., Auer, S., Oelen, A.: Linked open literature re- view using the neuro-symbolic open research knowledge graph. In: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. p. 1015–1018. WWW ’24, Association for Computing Machinery (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589...

    2024

  56. [65]

    Jiomekong, A., Oelen, A., Auer, S., Anna-Lena, L., Lars, V.: Food information engineering. AI Mag. 45(3), 338–353 (Sep 2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12185

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    The Electronic Library (2024)

    Jiomekong, A., Tiwari, S.: An approach based on open research knowledge graph for knowledge acquisition from scientific papers. The Electronic Library (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2023-0154

    2024 doi

  58. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12039 (2023)

    Katz, D.M., Hartung, D., Gerlach, L., Jana, A., Bommarito II, M.J.: Natural language processing in the legal domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12039 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Digital Health 7, 20552076211038151 (2021)

    Kaur, A., Singh, S., Chandan, J.S., Robbins, T., Patel, V.: Qualitative exploration of digital chatbot use in medical education: A pilot study. Digital Health 7, 20552076211038151 (2021)

    2021

  60. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01958 (2024)

    Kim, H., Venkataramanan, R., Sheth, A.: A survey on food ingredient substitutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01958 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  61. [70]

    org/abs/2301.10140

    Kinney, R., Anastasiades, C., Authur, R., Beltagy, I., Bragg, J., Bu- raczynski, A., Cachola, I., Candra, S., Chandrasekhar, Y., Cohan, A., et al.: The semantic scholar open data platform (2025), https://arxiv. org/abs/2301.10140

    2025 arXiv

  62. [71]

    In: European Semantic Web Conference

    Kolchin, M., Chistyakov, A., Lapaev, M., Khaydarova, R.: Foodpedia: Russian food products as a linked data dataset. In: European Semantic Web Conference. pp. 87–90. Springer (2015) 34

    2015

  63. [72]

    Science of The Total Environment 906, 167705 (2024)

    Konya, A., Nematzadeh, P.: Recent applications of ai to environmental disciplines: A review. Science of The Total Environment 906, 167705 (2024)

    2024

  64. [73]

    Journal of Economic Literature 61(4), 1281–1317 (2023)

    Korinek, A.: Generative ai for economic research: Use cases and impli- cations for economists. Journal of Economic Literature 61(4), 1281–1317 (2023)

    2023

  65. [74]

    Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics220, 104860 (2022)

    Lin, P., Ding, F., Hu, G., Li, C., Xiao, Y., Tse, K.T., Kwok, K., Kareem, A.: Machine learning-enabled estimation of crosswind load effect on tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics220, 104860 (2022)

    2022

  66. [75]

    Lira, B., Rogers, T., Goldstein, D.G., Ungar, L., Duckworth, A.L.: Learn- ing not cheating: Ai assistance can enhance rather than hinder skill de- velopment (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02880

    2025

  67. [76]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437 (2024)

    Liu, A., Feng, B., Xue, B., Wang, B., Wu, B., Lu, C., Zhao, C., Deng, C., Zhang, C., Ruan, C., et al.: Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [77]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30, 2003–2015 (2021)

    Liu, X., Min, W., Mei, S., Wang, L., Jiang, S.: Plant disease recognition: A large-scale benchmark dataset and a visual region and loss reweighting approach. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30, 2003–2015 (2021)

    2003

  69. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 (2024)

    Lu, C., Lu, C., Lange, R.T., Foerster, J., Clune, J., Ha, D.: The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  70. [79]

    NY Litigator 28(2), 8–12 (2023)

    Lyon, C.F.: Fake cases, real consequences: misuse of chatgpt leads to sanctions. NY Litigator 28(2), 8–12 (2023)

    2023

  71. [80]

    Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain pp

    Magnusson Sj¨ oberg, C.: Legal automation: Ai and law revisited. Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain pp. 173–187 (2019)

    2019

  72. [81]

    In: 2024 IEEE conference on artificial intelligence (CAI)

    Maleki, N., Padmanabhan, B., Dutta, K.: Ai hallucinations: a misnomer worth clarifying. In: 2024 IEEE conference on artificial intelligence (CAI). pp. 133–138. IEEE (2024)

    2024

  73. [82]

    Neurocomputing 599, 128111 (2024)

    Mersha, M., Lam, K., Wood, J., Alshami, A.K., Kalita, J.: Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey of needs, techniques, applications, and future direction. Neurocomputing 599, 128111 (2024)

    2024

  74. [83]

    In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

    Meskic, Z., Albakjaji, M., Jevremovic, N., Omerovic, E., Adams, J.: Dig- italization and innovation in achieving sdgs–impacts on legislation and practice. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 1026, p. 012061. IOP Publishing (2022) 35

    2022

  75. [84]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Mills, K.G., Han, F.X., Salameh, M., Lu, S., Zhou, C., He, J., Sun, F., Niu, D.: Building optimal neural architectures using interpretable knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 5726–5735 (06 2024)

    2024

  76. [85]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Mills, K.G., Salameh, M., Chen, R., Hassanpour, N., Lu, W., Niu, D.: Qua2sedimo: Quantifiable quantization sensitivity of diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 39, pp. 6153–6163 (2025)

    2025

  77. [86]

    Scientometrics 117(3), 1931–1990 (2018)

    Nasar, Z., Jaffry, S.W., Malik, M.K.: Information extraction from scientific articles: a survey. Scientometrics 117(3), 1931–1990 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2921-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-018-2921-5

    1931 doi

  78. [87]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07669 (2019)

    Neumann, M., King, D., Beltagy, I., Ammar, W.: Scispacy: fast and robust models for biomedical natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07669 (2019)

    1902 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Research Synthesis Methods 5(1), 50–59 (2014)

    O’Mara-Eves, A., Brunton, G., McDaid, D., Kavanagh, J., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: Techniques for identifying cross-disciplinary and ‘hard-to- detect’evidence for systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods 5(1), 50–59 (2014)

    2014

  80. [89]

    OSI: Open weights: Not quite what you’ve been told, https:// opensource.org/ai/open-weights

  81. [90]

    Challenges to Na- tional Defence in Contemporary Geopolitical Situation 1(1) (2024)

    Pakholchuk, V., Horiacheva, K.: Methodological concepts of appling ai into military and economic capabilities data analysis. Challenges to Na- tional Defence in Contemporary Geopolitical Situation 1(1) (2024)

    2024

  82. [91]

    cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers, [Online; posted 3-April-2025]

    PCs, N..: Neurips call for papers 2025 (April 2025), https://neurips. cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers, [Online; posted 3-April-2025]

    2025

  83. [92]

    Scientific Data 9(1), 389 (2022)

    Pestryakova, S., Vollmers, D., Sherif, M.A., Heindorf, S., Saleem, M., Moussallem, D., Ngomo, A.C.N.: Covidpubgraph: A fair knowledge graph of covid-19 publications. Scientific Data 9(1), 389 (2022)

    2022

  84. [93]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952 (2023)

    Podell, D., English, Z., Lacey, K., Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., M¨ uller, J., Penna, J., Rombach, R.: Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Scientometrics pp

    Pornprasit, C., Liu, X., Kiattipadungkul, P., Kertkeidkachorn, N., Kim, K.S., Noraset, T., Hassan, S.U., Tuarob, S.: Enhancing citation recom- mendation using citation network embedding. Scientometrics pp. 1–32 (2022)

    2022

  86. [95]

    Pride, D., Cancellieri, M., Knoth, P.: Core-gpt: Combining open access research and large language models for credible, trustworthy question an- swering. In: Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries: 27th Inter- national Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Lib...

    2023 doi

  87. [96]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01833 (2022)

    Priem, J., Piwowar, H., Orr, R.: Openalex: A fully-open index of schol- arly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01833 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Advanced Engineering Informatics 42, 100986 (2019)

    Rahmani, H.R., Chase, G., Wiering, M., K¨ onke, C.: A framework for brain learning-based control of smart structures. Advanced Engineering Informatics 42, 100986 (2019)

    2019

  89. [98]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 10684–10695 (06 2022)

    2022

  90. [99]

    In: ICLR (2021)

    Ru, B., Wan, X., Dong, X., Osborne, M.A.: Interpretable neural architec- ture search via bayesian optimisation with weisfeiler-lehman kernels. In: ICLR (2021)

    2021

  91. [100]

    Environmental Challenges 14, 100838 (2024)

    Saxena, N., Kumar, R., Rao, Y.K., Mondloe, D.S., Dhapekar, N.K., Sharma, A., Yadav, A.S.: Hybrid knn-svm machine learning approach for solar power forecasting. Environmental Challenges 14, 100838 (2024)

    2024

  92. [101]

    Shahid, A., Afzal, M.T., Abdar, M., Basiri, M.E., Zhou, X., Yen, N.Y., Chang, J.: Insights into relevant knowledge extraction tech- niques: a comprehensive review. J. Supercomput. 76(3), 1695–1733 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03009-y, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11...

    2020 doi

  93. [102]

    IEEE Access (2025)

    Siino, M., Falco, M., Croce, D., Rosso, P.: Exploring llms applications in law: A literature review on current legal nlp approaches. IEEE Access (2025)

    2025

  94. [103]

    Environment Protection Engineering 50(1) (2024)

    Singh, P., Mahor, V., Lakshmaiya, N., Shanker, K., Kaliappan, S., Muthukannan, M., Rajendran, G.: Prediction of groundwater contami- nation in an open landfill area using a novel hybrid clustering-based ai model. Environment Protection Engineering 50(1) (2024)

    2024

  95. [104]

    Nutrients 14(20), 4435 (2022)

    Stefanidis, K., Tsatsou, D., Konstantinidis, D., Gymnopoulos, L., Daras, P., Wilson-Barnes, S., Hart, K., Cornelissen, V., Decorte, E., Lalama, E., et al.: Protein ai advisor: a knowledge-based recommendation framework using expert-validated meals for healthy diets. Nutrients ...

    2022

  96. [105]

    Reference services review 39(2), 278–302 (2011) 37

    Stephen McMinn, H.: Library support of bibliographic management tools: a review. Reference services review 39(2), 278–302 (2011) 37

    2011

  97. [106]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09136 (2023)

    Sun, Z.: A short survey of viewing large language models in legal aspect. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09136 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  98. [107]

    In: Proceed- ings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining

    Tang, J.: Aminer: Toward understanding big scholar data. In: Proceed- ings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. pp. 467–467 (2016)

    2016

  99. [108]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 (2023)

    Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., Bashlykov, N., Batra, S., Bhargava, P., Bhosale, S., et al.: Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Annals of emergency medicine 66(5), 549–553 (2015)

    Trueger, N.S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C.H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L., Lin, M.: The altmetric score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of emergency medicine 66(5), 549–553 (2015)

    2015

  101. [110]

    unicef-who-the world bank: Joint child malnutri- tion estimates (jme)—levels and trends–2023 edition (2023)

    UNICEF, et al.: Who. unicef-who-the world bank: Joint child malnutri- tion estimates (jme)—levels and trends–2023 edition (2023)

    2023

  102. [111]

    Complex & intel- ligent systems 9(1), 1059–1095 (2023)

    Verma, S., Bhatia, R., Harit, S., Batish, S.: Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review. Complex & intel- ligent systems 9(1), 1059–1095 (2023)

    2023

  103. [112]

    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 214, 108270 (2023)

    Visentin, F., Cremasco, S., Sozzi, M., Signorini, L., Signorini, M., Marinello, F., Muradore, R.: A mixed-autonomous robotic platform for intra-row and inter-row weed removal for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 214, 108270 (2023)

    2023

  104. [113]

    In: International Conference on Computers in Educa- tion (2024)

    VIZCONDE, E., CAGUIAT, M.R., et al.: Generative artificial intelli- gence in education: Evaluating students’ self-efficacy and utilization in their homework. In: International Conference on Computers in Educa- tion (2024)

    2024

  105. [114]

    Compan- ion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (2022), https://api

    Wade, A.D.: The semantic scholar academic graph (s2ag). Compan- ion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (2022), https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:251597885

    2022

  106. [115]

    https://hdl.handle.net/10419/271285 (1 2023), https://hdl.handle

    Walter, Johannes: Human oversight done right : the AI Act should use humans to monitor AI only when effective. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/271285 (1 2023), https://hdl.handle. net/10419/271285

    2023

  107. [116]

    Quantitative Science Studies 1(1), 396–413 (02 2020)

    Wang, K., Shen, Z., Huang, C., Wu, C.H., Dong, Y., Kanakia, A.: Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies 1(1), 396–413 (02 2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss a 00021

    2020 doi

  108. [117]

    Public Services Quarterly 19(3), 201–207 (2023) 38

    Whitfield, S., Hofmann, M.A.: Elicit: Ai literature review research assis- tant. Public Services Quarterly 19(3), 201–207 (2023) 38

    2023

  109. [118]

    https://github.com/lixin4ever/ Conference-Acceptance-Rate (2025)

    Xin, L.: Conference-acceptance-rate. https://github.com/lixin4ever/ Conference-Acceptance-Rate (2025)

    2025

  110. [119]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01469 (2023)

    Yao, J.Y., Ning, K.P., Liu, Z.H., Ning, M.N., Liu, Y.Y., Yuan, L.: Llm lies: Hallucinations are not bugs, but features as adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01469 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Yi, S., Liu, Y., Sun, Z., Cong, T., He, X., Song, J., Xu, K., Li, Q.: Jailbreak attacks and defenses against large language models: A survey (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04295

    2024 arXiv

  112. [121]

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 169, 112897 (2022)

    Yu, S., Vautard, R.: A transfer method to estimate hub-height wind speed from 10 meters wind speed based on machine learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 169, 112897 (2022)

    2022

  113. [122]

    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 198, 107062 (2022)

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Yu, J., He, L., Chen, J., He, Y.: Complete and accurate holly fruits counting using yolox object detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 198, 107062 (2022)

    2022

  114. [123]

    Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Shi, E., Ma, Y., Zhong, W., Chen, J., Mao, M., Zheng, Z.: Llm hallucinations in practical code generation: Phe- nomena, mechanism, and mitigation. Proc. ACM Softw. Eng. 2(ISSTA) (Jun 2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3728894

    2025 doi

  115. [124]

    In: 14th USENIX sym- posium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 20)

    Zheng, L., Jia, C., Sun, M., Wu, Z., Yu, C.H., Haj-Ali, A., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Zhuo, D., Sen, K., et al.: Ansor: Generating {High- Performance} tensor programs for deep learning. In: 14th USENIX sym- posium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 20). pp. 863–879 (2020)

    2020

  116. [125]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404 (2024) 39

    Zheng, Z., Peng, X., Yang, T., Shen, C., Li, S., Liu, H., Zhou, Y., Li, T., You, Y.: Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404 (2024) 39

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.