REVIEW 1 cited by
Interpreting Dense Retrieval as Mixture of Topics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Dense Retrieval (DR) reaches state-of-the-art results in first-stage retrieval, but little is known about the mechanisms that contribute to its success. Therefore, in this work, we conduct an interpretation study of recently proposed DR models. Specifically, we first discretize the embeddings output by the document and query encoders. Based on the discrete representations, we analyze the attribution of input tokens. Both qualitative and quantitative experiments are carried out on public test collections. Results suggest that DR models pay attention to different aspects of input and extract various high-level topic representations. Therefore, we can regard the representations learned by DR models as a mixture of high-level topics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decoding Dense Embeddings: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting and Discretizing Dense Retrieval
Dense retrieval embeddings can be decomposed into interpretable latent concepts that serve both as explanations and as efficient sparse indexing units for retrieval.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.