Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.06050 v2 pith:OVI3AO3J submitted 2019-11-14 gr-qc astro-ph.SR

classification gr-qcastro-ph.SR
keywords modelblackmassmodelsmultipolesbinaryfindhole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Estimates of the source parameters of gravitational-wave (GW) events produced by compact binary mergers rely on theoretical models for the GW signal. We present the first frequency-domain model for inspiral, merger and ringdown of the GW signal from precessing binary-black-hole systems that also includes multipoles beyond the leading-order quadrupole. Our model, {\tt PhenomPv3HM}, is a combination of the higher-multipole non-precessing model {\tt PhenomHM} and the spin-precessing model {\tt PhenomPv3} that includes two-spin precession via a dynamical rotation of the GW multipoles. We validate the new model by comparing to a large set of precessing numerical-relativity simulations and find excellent agreement across the majority of the parameter space they cover. For mass ratios $<5$ the mismatch improves, on average, from $\sim6\%$ to $\sim 2\%$ compared to {\tt PhenomPv3} when we include higher multipoles in the model. However, we find mismatches $\sim8\%$ for the mass-ratio $6$ and highly spinning simulation. As a first application of the new model we have analysed the binary black hole event GW170729. We find larger values for the primary black hole mass of $58.25^{+11.73}_{-12.53} \, M_\odot$ (90\% credible interval). The lower limit ($\sim 46 \, M_\odot$) is comparable to the proposed maximum black hole mass predicted by different stellar evolution models due to the pulsation pair-instability supernova (PPISN) mechanism. If we assume that the primary \ac{BH} in GW170729 formed through a PPISN then out of the four PPISN models we considered only the model of Woosley (2017) is consistent with our mass measurements at the 90\% level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ensemble-Based Residual Tests of GW231123 across Waveform Models

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GW231123's residuals are consistent with detector noise for all five waveform models, and the strain-level differences between models are too small to be detected.

  2. Advancing the Effective-One-Body Framework in the Test-Mass Limit

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SEOB-TML cuts dephasing by up to an order of magnitude in the test-mass limit by Q-factorizing the flux (including horizon absorption) and by modeling mode mixing with extracted QNM coefficients.

  3. AthenaK simulations of the binary black hole merger GW150914

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new open-source GPU code, AthenaK, reproduces the GW150914 merger: remnant mass within 0.01%, spin within 0.02%, and waveform phase within about 0.35 radians of established simulations.

Pith tools