Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Ubiquitous van der Waals altermagnetism with sliding/moire ferroelectricity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Anti-parallel stacking of magnetic van der Waals layers is predicted to make them simultaneously altermagnetic and sliding ferroelectric.

desk verdict Plausible stacking route to altermagnet-ferroelectric coexistence, but the 'ubiquitous' framing and missing magnetic ground-state checks mean the paper's strongest form overreaches; the specific bulk examples deserve a second look. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17493 v1 pith:OZSAFL3B submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Yuxuan Sheng , Junwei Liu , Jia Zhang , Menghao Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismslidingferroelectricitymoirevanderWaalsmultilayersnon-relativisticspinsplittingpseudo-altermagnetismantiferromagneticinterlayercouplingfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that stacking magnetic van der Waals monolayers in anti-parallel configurations can make them altermagnetic while also giving them sliding ferroelectricity. The authors show by density-functional calculations that in bulk 1T NiCl2, VSe2, CrSe2, and MnBi2Te4 the interlayer antiferromagnetic coupling combined with inversion-symmetry-breaking stacking produces non-relativistic spin splitting with zero net magnetization. Twisted bilayers such as 2H VS2 are predicted to combine altermagnetism with moire ferroelectricity, and untwisted bilayers can show pseudo-altermagnetism whose spin splitting reverses when the polarization is switched by sliding. If correct, the work turns stacking into a general switch to create electric-field-controllable altermagnets.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the anti-parallel stacking of 1T magnetic MX2 layers, which breaks inversion symmetry and produces a vertical electric polarization switchable by interlayer sliding. In the periodic bulk, the vertical translation restores equivalence between adjacent layers, and the two spin sublattices are connected by the screw operation $A = \{6^1_{001} \mid \tau(0,0,0.5)\}$ (a 60-degree rotation about the c-axis combined with a half-cell translation), so the spin space group belongs to type SST-4B and non-relativistic spin splitting is allowed away from symmetry-protected k-paths. For twisted bilayers, a rotation operation connects the sublattices, and for untwisted bilayers the inversion-breaking polarization itself lifts spin degeneracy even though the layers are inequivalent. The paper uses spin space group classification, DFT band structures, nudged-elastic-band pathways for switching barriers, and Berry-phase polarization calculations to establish these predictions.

What would settle it

A spin- and angle-resolved photoemission measurement on bulk antiparallel-stacked NiCl2, VSe2, CrSe2, or MnBi2Te4 looking along the predicted C-L path should detect non-relativistic spin-split bands; observing no splitting there, or finding a ferromagnetic ground state with net magnetization, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that altermagnetism, a collinear compensated magnetic order with non-relativistic spin splitting, can be engineered by the same anti-parallel stacking that creates sliding ferroelectricity. In the bulk 1T phases, each ferromagnetic layer couples antiferromagnetically to its neighbor, and the two opposing spin sublattices are connected by a rotation-plus-translation operation rather than by inversion, satisfying the symmetry rule for altermagnetism; the spin splitting appears along directions such as C-L while remaining symmetry-protected along high-symmetry paths. In twisted bilayers the rotation operation makes the two layers equivalent, giving altermagnetism combined with moire ferroelectric domains. For some untwisted bilayers the vertical polarization makes the layers inequivalent, yet the net magnetization is still zero and the spin splitting is coupled to sliding ferroelectricity, a state the authors call pseudo-altermagnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume the anti-parallel stacking configurations are the stable or experimentally accessible phases and that the adopted Hubbard U values capture antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling; if the real stacking or magnetic ground state differs, the predicted spin splitting will not appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bulk antiparallel-stacked 1T NiCl2, VSe2, CrSe2, and MnBi2Te4 are predicted to be simultaneous sliding ferroelectrics and altermagnets, with spin splitting along the C-L and related paths.
  • Ferroelectric sliding should reverse the sign of the non-relativistic spin splitting in untwisted bilayer 2H VS2, giving electric-field control of spin channels without moving magnetization.
  • Twisted magnetic bilayers such as 2H VS2 combine moire ferroelectricity with altermagnetism, producing spin-split bands in a ferroelectric domain superlattice.
  • The design rule is generic, so many van der Waals magnetic multilayers beyond the calculated examples are expected to show this coexistence.
  • The coexistence offers a crystal platform where spin splitting and electric polarization are coupled, potentially useful for electrically switchable spin transport.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry argument implies a wider design rule: any 1T magnetic MX2 monolayer with ferromagnetic intralayer order and antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling in an anti-parallel stack should be altermagnetic, so the candidate list can be extended beyond the compounds calculated here.
  • If the predicted switching survives in devices, the low sliding barriers (tens of meV per cell) would allow nonvolatile electric-field reversal of the spin-splitting sign at speeds and endurance comparable to state-of-the-art sliding ferroelectrics, something the paper notes but does not simulate.
  • A direct transport calculation of spin-polarized current in the pseudo-altermagnetic bilayer would test whether pseudo order behaves like true altermagnetism for practical spintronics; this is not reported in the paper.
  • The moire ferroelectric-altermagnetic bilayer suggests that twist angle could be used to pattern altermagnetic domains, and that local probes of the domain walls might reveal spin-split edge states; these are consequences the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a stacking-engineering strategy to realize van der Waals altermagnetism combined with sliding or moiré ferroelectricity. Using DFT (GGA+U) and spin-space-group analysis, the authors report non-relativistic spin splittings in antiparallel-stacked bulk NiCl2, VSe2, CrSe2, and MnBi2Te4, as well as in a twisted 2H VS2 bilayer and an untwisted polar 2H VS2 bilayer. They also compute ferroelectric switching barriers and polarizations for the bulk examples. The central claim is that these systems form a 'ubiquitous' and 'pervasive' class of altermagnetic ferroelectrics whose spin splitting can be switched by interlayer sliding.

Significance. The idea of combining sliding ferroelectricity with altermagnetism in layered van der Waals magnets is original and timely, and the specific DFT band structures for the bulk antiparallel-stacked examples, together with the spin-space-group assignments, provide concrete evidence that the proposed symmetry mechanism works in those model systems. The paper also identifies a potentially useful 'pseudo-altermagnetic' bilayer regime with zero net magnetization and field-reversible spin splitting. However, the claims of universality and of moiré ferroelectricity go beyond the presented calculations, and the physical realization of the altermagnetic state depends on a magnetic ground-state assumption that is not quantitatively established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussion (Figs. 2-3) and Methods] The AFM interlayer coupling is a load-bearing assumption that is asserted but not demonstrated. The text states that NiCl2, VSe2, CrSe2, and MnBi2Te4 in antiparallel stacking are AFM-coupled, but no AFM-versus-FM total-energy differences, no exchange parameters, and no Hubbard-U or vdW-functional sensitivity tests are reported. Because the same DFT setup yields FM order for CrI3 and CrBr3 (as the authors note), the sign of the interlayer exchange is not established by the presented data. If the true ground state is FM, the compensated spin sublattices disappear and the reported spin splittings do not describe the equilibrium phase.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4(a)-(b)] The twisted 2H VS2 bilayer result is not reproducible because no twist angle, moiré cell size, or relaxation procedure is specified. The band structure in Fig. 4(a) appears to come from a small cell, and the moiré ferroelectricity claim is supported only by a schematic domain cartoon. A specific commensurate twist angle and a calculation of the moiré polarization are required to substantiate the combination of moiré ferroelectricity with altermagnetism.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusions] The terms 'ubiquitous' and 'pervasive' overstate the evidence. The paper presents four bulk examples and one untwisted bilayer with spin splitting, plus one incompletely specified twisted bilayer, but gives no general structural criterion or broad materials survey that would justify universality. The central claim should be reformulated as a design principle, or the authors should provide a systematic search over a wider family of layered magnets.
  4. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4(c)] The concept of 'pseudo-altermagnetism' is not clearly distinguished from ordinary spin splitting induced by the vertical polarization. The text claims non-relativistic spin splitting with zero net magnetization, but no spin-space-group analysis is given for the untwisted 2H VS2 bilayer. Without a symmetry classification, the reader cannot tell whether the effect is a compensated altermagnetic splitting or simply a Rashba-like splitting from the polar field; a definition and symmetry analysis should be added.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods] The Hubbard U values are taken from previous studies without any discussion of how sensitive the AFM/FM ordering or the spin splitting is to these parameters; even a short qualitative statement would help the reader assess robustness.
  2. [Figures 2-4] The spin-resolved band structures do not indicate the spin-projection axis, the energy scale, or the magnitude of the spin splitting; adding axis labels and a marker for a representative splitting would improve interpretability.
  3. [Fig. 4(c)] The polarization of the untwisted 2H VS2 bilayer is reported as 0.71 pC/m, whereas bulk polarizations elsewhere are in μC/m²; please check the units and conversion factors and use a consistent notation.
  4. [References] References [23], [24], and [27] are cited as arXiv preprints; if published versions now exist (for example, in Physical Review journals), they should be updated.
  5. [Throughout] The text uses 'unitcell' without a space in several places; this should be corrected to 'unit cell'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DFT results are self-contained and the symmetry analysis relies on external formalism.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are obtained directly from first-principles DFT band-structure calculations and NEB switching-barrier calculations, not from fitting or from definitions. The symmetry analysis uses the established spin-space-group classification of external references (e.g., [30], [59]) as a diagnostic to identify where non-relativistic spin splitting is allowed, and the band structures are then computed independently. The only self-citations are to the authors' prior works [1,2] introducing sliding/moire ferroelectricity, but that premise is independently supported by numerous experimental references ([3]-[20]) and is not used as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem. The term 'pseudo-altermagnetism' is introduced after the calculation as a proposed label for a computed effect, not as an input from which the effect is derived. Concerns about the assumed AFM ground states, lack of AFM-versus-FM energy comparisons, U-sensitivity, and the unspecified twist angle are correctness and reproducibility risks, not circularity. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on DFT calculations whose free parameters (Hubbard U, vdW functional, stacking configurations) are mostly inherited from previous studies without sensitivity checks. The symmetry classification is applied as a standard tool, not derived in this paper. The twisted-bilayer case introduces an unspecified twist angle, making part of the claim unverifiable.

free parameters (5)
  • Hubbard U for NiCl2 = 4.47 eV
    Taken from a previous study and directly controls the magnetic ground state that underpins the altermagnetic splitting. No sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Hubbard U for VS2 = 3.0 eV
    Taken from previous work; affects whether the interlayer coupling is AFM. No sensitivity analysis.
  • Hubbard U and J for MnBi2Te4 = U=4.0 eV, J=0.9 eV
    Literature values that determine the magnetic state and therefore the spin splitting.
  • Hubbard U and J for CrSe2 = U=4.5 eV, J=0.6 eV
    Literature values used with optB86b-vdW; different functional than other systems, introducing an uncontrolled comparison.
  • Twist angle for 2H VS2 bilayer = not specified
    The twisted-bilayer calculation is presented without specifying the twist angle, making the moire ferroelectricity claim untestable.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA+U accurately describes the magnetic ground state and spin splitting of these layered magnets.
    The entire identification of altermagnetism and pseudo-altermagnetism depends on the reliability of GGA+U, with U values inherited from literature. No benchmark against experiment is provided.
  • standard math The spin space group classification framework used (Refs. 23, 24, 59) is complete and correctly applied.
    The symmetry analysis relies on this published framework; if the classification is incomplete, the assignment of SST-4B could be wrong.
  • domain assumption The chosen anti-parallel stacking configurations are the stable or experimentally accessible phases.
    The paper assumes these stacking orders exist (e.g., bulk NiCl2 was synthesized, but others are assumed). If the real stacking differs, the predicted splittings may vanish.
  • domain assumption Van der Waals corrected DFT captures interlayer interaction energies accurately for barrier calculations.
    Switching barriers are computed with DFT-D3 or optB86b-vdW, whose accuracy for these systems is not assessed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ubiquitous van der Waals altermagnetism with sliding/moire ferroelectricity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OZSAFL3B

@misc{pith2026241117493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ubiquitous van der Waals altermagnetism with sliding/moire ferroelectricity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OZSAFL3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17493}
}
read the original abstract

According to the recent studies on sliding/moire ferroelectricity, most 2D van der Waals nonferroelectric monolayers can become ferroelectric via multilayer stacking. In this paper we propose that similar strategy can be used to induce desirable van der Waals altermagnetism with symmetry-compensated collinear magnetic orders and non-relativistic spin splitting. Our first-principles calculations show the pervasive co-existence of sliding ferroelectricity and altermagnetism in a series of magnetic multilayers with anti-parallel stacking configurations. Upon a twist angle in bilayers, moire ferroelectricity can be combined with altermagnetism, while some untwisted bilayers exhibit pseudo-altermagnetism with zero net magnetizations and non-relativistic spin splittings coupled with sliding ferroelectricity. Our study significantly expands the scope of altermagnetism, and its combination with sliding/moire ferroelectricity brings in new physics as well as promising applications, which should stimulate further experimental efforts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tunable altermagnetism via inter-chain engineering in parallelassembled atomic chains

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quasi-1D monolayers of parallel atomic chains are predicted to be altermagnets when inter-chain coupling is ferromagnetic, and to switch to antiferromagnetic nodal-line semiconductors when the inter-chain spacing is changed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Li and M

    L. Li and M. Wu, ACS Nano 11, 6382 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Wu and J

    M. Wu and J. Li, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2115703118 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Yasuda, X

    K. Yasuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo -Herrero, Science 372, 1458 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Vizner Stern et al., Science 372, 1462 (2021)

    M. Vizner Stern et al., Science 372, 1462 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Wang et al., Nature 629, 74 (2024)

    L. Wang et al., Nature 629, 74 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Sharma, F

    P. Sharma, F. -X. Xiang, D. -F. Shao, D. Zhang, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. R. Hamilton, and J. Seidel, Science Advances 5, eaax5080 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Z. Fei, W. Zhao, T. A. Palomaki, B. Sun, M. K. Miller, Z. Zhao, J. Yan, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden, Nature 560, 336 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Xiao et al., Nature Physics 16, 1028 (2020)

    J. Xiao et al., Nature Physics 16, 1028 (2020)

    2020

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    X. Wang, K. Yasuda, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo - Herrero, Nature nanotechnology 17, 367 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Rogée, L

    L. Rogée, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Cai, P. Wang, M. Chhowalla, W. Ji, and S. P. Lau, Science 376, 973 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Weston et al., Nature nanotechnology 17, 390 (2022)

    A. Weston et al., Nature nanotechnology 17, 390 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Y. Liu, S. Liu, B. Li, W. J. Yoo, and J. Hone, Nano Lett. 22, 1265 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Wan et al., Phys

    Y. Wan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 067601 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    D. Yang, J. Liang, J. Wu, Y. Xiao, J. I. Dadap, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and Z. Ye, Nature Communications 15, 1389 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Deb et al., Nature 612, 465 (2022)

    S. Deb et al., Nature 612, 465 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Meng et al., Nature Communications 13, 7696 (2022)

    P. Meng et al., Nature Communications 13, 7696 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Sui et al., Nature Communications 15, 3799 (2024)

    F. Sui et al., Nature Communications 15, 3799 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    L. P. Miao, N. Ding, N. Wang, C. Shi, H. Y. Ye, L. L. Li, Y. F. Yao, S. Dong, and Y. Zhang, Nature Materials 21, 1158 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Yasuda et al., Science 385, 53 (2024)

    K. Yasuda et al., Science 385, 53 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Bian et al., Science 385, 57 (2024)

    R. Bian et al., Science 385, 57 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Krempasky et al., Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    J. Krempasky et al., Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Lee et al., Physical Review Letters 132, 036702 (2024)

    S. Lee et al., Physical Review Letters 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    J. Ren, X. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, J. Li, C. Li, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10369 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12366 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Turek, Physical Review B 106, 094432 (2022)

    I. Turek, Physical Review B 106, 094432 (2022)

    2022

  18. [27]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05820 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  19. [28]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Phys Rev Lett 131, 076003 (2023)

    2023

  20. [29]

    Reimers et al., Nat Commun 15, 2116 (2024)

    S. Reimers et al., Nat Commun 15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X 12 (2022)

    2022

  22. [31]

    S. B. Zhang, L. H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Nat Commun 15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  23. [32]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Physical Review B 102 (2020)

    2020

  24. [33]

    Fedchenko et al., Sci Adv 10, eadj4883 (2024)

    O. Fedchenko et al., Sci Adv 10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  25. [34]

    Chakraborty, R

    A. Chakraborty, R. González Hernández, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Physical Review B 109, 144421 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. Kravchuk, R. Jaeschke -Ubiergo, K. Yershov, T. Jungwirth, L. Šmejkal, J. v. d. Brink, and J. Sinova, npj Spintronics 2, 35 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    Smolyanyuk, L

    A. Smolyanyuk, L. Šmejkal, and I. I. Mazin, SciPost Physics Codebases, 030 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Physical Review X 14 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Phys Chem Chem Phys 18, 13294 (2016)

    2016

  30. [39]

    Bai et al., Phys Rev Lett 130, 216701 (2023)

    H. Bai et al., Phys Rev Lett 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R. W. Zhang, L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Phys Rev Lett 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    S. W. Lovesey, D. D. Khalyavin, and G. van der Laan, Physical Revie w B 108 (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    Kriegner et al., Physical Review B 96 (2017)

    D. Kriegner et al., Physical Review B 96 (2017)

    2017

  34. [43]

    Lee et al., Phys Rev Lett 132, 036702 (2024)

    S. Lee et al., Phys Rev Lett 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    I. I. Mazin, Physical Review B 107 (2023)

    2023

  36. [45]

    Koepernik, M

    Mazin, II, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonzalez -Hernandez, and L. Smejkal, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17146 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    González, A

    J. González, A. León, C. González -Fuentes, and R. Gallardo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08999 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  39. [48]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K. Q. Chen, and L. M. Tang, Phys Rev Lett 130, 046401 (2023)

    2023

  40. [49]

    Zeng and Y.-J

    S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Physical Review B 110 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Physical Review B 108 (2023)

    2023

  42. [51]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  43. [52]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J. -F. Jia, and J. Liu, Nature Communications 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  44. [53]

    Y. Zhu, T. Chen, Y. Li, L. Qiao, X. Ma, C. Liu, T. Hu, H. Gao, and W. Ren, Nano Letters 24, 472 (2024)

    2024

  45. [54]

    L. Shen, J. Zhou, T. Yan g, M. Yang, and Y. P. Feng, Accounts of Materials Research 3, 572 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    Zeng and Y.-J

    S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Physical Review B 110, 054406 (2024)

    2024

  47. [56]

    Guo, X.-S

    S.-D. Guo, X.-S. Guo, K. Cheng, K. Wang, and Y. S. Ang, Applied Physics Letters 123, 082401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [57]

    S. Dong, H. Xiang, and E. Dagotto, National Science Review 6, 629 (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    Aguirre et al., Adv Mater 36, e2402723 (2024)

    A. Aguirre et al., Adv Mater 36, e2402723 (2024)

    2024

  50. [59]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Physical Review Materials 5 (2021)

    2021

  51. [60]

    Bonilla et al., Nat Nanotechnol 13, 289 (2018)

    M. Bonilla et al., Nat Nanotechnol 13, 289 (2018)

    2018

  52. [61]

    Liu et al., J Phys Chem Lett 12, 7752 (2021)

    M. Liu et al., J Phys Chem Lett 12, 7752 (2021)

    2021

  53. [62]

    W. Chen, Z. Sun, Z. Wang, L. Gu, X. Xu, S. Wu, and C. Gao, Science 366, 983 (2019)

    2019

  54. [63]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Physical Review B 71 (2005)

    2005

  55. [64]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Physical Review B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  56. [65]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  57. [66]

    P. E. Blöchl, Physical Review B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  58. [67]

    Ghojavand, M

    A. Ghojavand, M. Soenen, N. Rezaei, M. Alaei, C. Sevik, and M. V. Miloševi ć , arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20489 (2024)

    2024

  59. [68]

    Liu et al., Nano Lett 24, 16 (2024)

    S. Liu et al., Nano Lett 24, 16 (2024)

    2024

  60. [69]

    L. Wu, L. Zhou, X. Zhou, C. Wang, and W. Ji, Physical Review B 106 (2022)

    2022

  61. [70]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, J Comput Chem 32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  62. [71]

    Klimeš, D

    J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Physical Review B 83 (2011)

    2011

  63. [72]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, The Journal of Chemical Physics 113, 9901 (2000)

    2000

  64. [73]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Physical Review B 47, 1651 (1993). Figure 1. (a) Geometric structures of 2H/1T monolayers, their sliding ferroelectric bilayers and bulk phases. (b) Among their corresponding AFM states, the bulk 1T phases can potentially become altermagneti...

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.