Lyman-α forest constraints on pure and mixed fuzzy dark matter
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:10 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Lyman-alpha forest data requires pure fuzzy dark matter mass above 1.9 times 10 to the minus 21 electronvolts at 95 percent credibility.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We constrain both pure and mixed FDM models using measurements of the 1D Lyman-α forest flux power spectrum at z=5.0, 4.6, and 4.2. We perform cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with modified initial conditions and construct a two-stage neural network emulator for accurate analysis. The first stage predicts the CDM 1D flux power spectrum while the second stage predicts the MFDM effect relative to the CDM baseline. After marginalizing over the intergalactic medium parameters, we obtain the FDM mass m_FDM > 1.9×10^{-21} eV at 95% credible level for the PFDM model. For the MFDM model, we find the FDM fraction of dark matter f_FDM < 0.07, 0.12, and 0.65 at 95% credible level for log10(m_FDM
What carries the argument
The two-stage neural network emulator that first predicts the cold dark matter 1D flux power spectrum and then adds the relative suppression from mixed fuzzy dark matter, enforcing the correct CDM limit and enabling interpolation across masses and fractions.
If this is right
- Pure fuzzy dark matter with mass below 1.9×10^{-21} eV is excluded at 95 percent credibility after marginalizing intergalactic medium parameters.
- Mixed fuzzy dark matter fractions are limited to less than 7 percent for masses near 10^{-23} eV, 12 percent near 10^{-22} eV, and 65 percent near 10^{-21} eV.
- No useful upper bound on the fuzzy dark matter fraction applies when its mass exceeds roughly 10^{-20} eV.
- The emulator improves sensitivity to weak suppression effects while automatically recovering the cold dark matter case at zero fraction.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If these bounds hold, fuzzy dark matter cannot dominate the total dark matter density at the lowest masses without violating Lyman-alpha observations.
- The relative-suppression emulator technique could be applied to other small-scale observables such as the matter power spectrum from weak lensing or galaxy clustering.
- Tighter future Lyman-alpha measurements at similar redshifts would push the pure-model mass limit higher or further restrict mixed fractions.
Load-bearing premise
The two-stage neural network emulator trained on hydrodynamical simulations accurately captures the relative mixed fuzzy dark matter suppression effect on the 1D flux power spectrum without systematic bias.
What would settle it
A new measurement of the 1D Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum at z=4.2-5.0 showing substantially more small-scale power than the emulator predicts for any parameter combination inside the reported 95 percent credible regions would falsify the derived mass and fraction bounds.
read the original abstract
Fuzzy dark matter (FDM), often realized as an ultralight scalar field, can suppress the growth of small-scale structures and could be strictly tested with Lyman-$\alpha$ forest measurements. In this work, we constrain both pure and mixed FDM models (PFDM and MFDM) using measurements of the one-dimensional (1D) Lyman-$\alpha$ forest flux power spectrum at $z=5.0$, 4.6, and 4.2. We perform cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with modified initial conditions and construct a two-stage neural network emulator for accurate analysis. The first stage predicts the cold dark matter (CDM) 1D flux power spectrum, while the second stage predicts the MFDM effect relative to the CDM baseline. This construction improves the sensitivity to weak FDM effects, enforces the correct CDM limit, and enables robust interpolation across a broad range of FDM masses and fractions. After marginalizing over the intergalactic medium parameters, we obtain the FDM mass $m_{\mathrm{FDM}}>1.9\times10^{-21}~\mathrm{eV}$ at 95\% credible level for the PFDM model. For the MFDM model, we find the FDM fraction of dark matter $f_{\mathrm{FDM}}<0.07$, $0.12$, and $0.65$ at 95\% credible level for $\log_{10}(m_{\mathrm{FDM}}/\mathrm{eV})=-23.0$, $-22.0$, and $-21.0$, respectively. When $\log_{10}(m_{\mathrm{FDM}}/\mathrm{eV})\gtrsim -20$, the current data do not provide an effective upper limit on $f_{\mathrm{FDM}}$.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript constrains pure fuzzy dark matter (PFDM) and mixed fuzzy dark matter (MFDM) models using 1D Lyman-α forest flux power spectrum measurements at z=5.0, 4.6, and 4.2. Cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with modified initial conditions are performed, and a two-stage neural network emulator is constructed: the first stage predicts the CDM 1D flux power spectrum while the second predicts the relative MFDM suppression effect. After marginalizing over intergalactic medium parameters, the authors report m_FDM > 1.9×10^{-21} eV (95% CL) for PFDM and f_FDM < 0.07, 0.12, 0.65 (95% CL) for log10(m_FDM/eV) = -23.0, -22.0, -21.0 in the MFDM case, with no effective upper limit for log10(m_FDM/eV) ≳ -20.
Significance. If the emulator pipeline is shown to be unbiased, the derived bounds would be among the strongest Lyman-α constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter, particularly the mass-dependent f_FDM limits in the mixed model. The two-stage emulator design, which enforces the CDM limit by construction and targets weak relative signals, is a clear methodological strength that improves interpolation across the explored (m_FDM, f_FDM) range.
major comments (2)
- [Methods (emulator section)] Methods (emulator construction): No held-out test errors, residual maps, or quantitative validation of the second-stage network's accuracy in predicting the relative suppression ΔP(k)/P_CDM(k) across the (m_FDM, f_FDM) grid and at the three redshifts is reported. This is load-bearing for the abstract claims, because any systematic interpolation bias larger than the data covariance would shift the marginalized posteriors on m_FDM and f_FDM.
- [Results] Results (posterior constraints): The reported 95% credible intervals assume the emulator recovers the CDM limit and the weak MFDM effect to sub-percent precision without architecture-dependent residuals; the absence of such checks leaves the central bounds vulnerable to unquantified bias in the relative prediction step.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the notation "log10(m_FDM/eV)" should be rendered consistently with the body text as log_{10}(m_FDM/eV) or \log_{10}(m_{ m FDM}/{ m eV}).
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which emphasize the need for explicit emulator validation to support the reported constraints. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Methods (emulator section)] Methods (emulator construction): No held-out test errors, residual maps, or quantitative validation of the second-stage network's accuracy in predicting the relative suppression ΔP(k)/P_CDM(k) across the (m_FDM, f_FDM) grid and at the three redshifts is reported. This is load-bearing for the abstract claims, because any systematic interpolation bias larger than the data covariance would shift the marginalized posteriors on m_FDM and f_FDM.
Authors: We agree that quantitative validation of the second-stage emulator is necessary to substantiate the claims. The two-stage design enforces the CDM limit by construction and focuses on the relative suppression, but the submitted manuscript did not report held-out test errors, residual maps, or grid-wide accuracy metrics. In the revised version we will include these validations, demonstrating that interpolation errors remain sub-percent and below the data covariance across the explored (m_FDM, f_FDM) range and redshifts. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results] Results (posterior constraints): The reported 95% credible intervals assume the emulator recovers the CDM limit and the weak MFDM effect to sub-percent precision without architecture-dependent residuals; the absence of such checks leaves the central bounds vulnerable to unquantified bias in the relative prediction step.
Authors: We acknowledge that the absence of reported validation leaves the precision assumption unquantified in the text. While internal checks supported sub-percent accuracy, these were not documented. The revised manuscript will add the requested residual and error analyses to confirm that architecture-dependent biases do not affect the marginalized posteriors, thereby strengthening the reported 95% credible intervals. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; constraints from external data after marginalization
full rationale
The paper derives bounds on FDM mass and fraction by training a two-stage NN emulator on independent hydrodynamical simulations (with modified initial conditions) and then comparing the resulting 1D flux power spectra to external Lyman-α forest measurements at z=5.0,4.6,4.2 while marginalizing IGM parameters. The emulator construction (first stage for CDM baseline, second for relative MFDM suppression) is a computational tool that enforces the CDM limit by design but does not make the final posterior equivalent to any fitted input or self-citation; the reported limits (m_FDM>1.9e-21 eV for PFDM; f_FDM upper bounds for MFDM) are data-driven and falsifiable against the observations. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- intergalactic medium parameters
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Hydrodynamical simulations with modified initial conditions accurately model the effect of FDM on the 1D Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Tracing Ultra Light Axions in Post-reionization, Lyman-$\alpha$ and CMB Missions
Fisher forecasts indicate joint post-reionization LSS cross-spectra and CMB-S4-like data can reach O(10^{-4}) uncertainty on ultra-light axion fraction for m_a ≲ 10^{-28} eV, with peak sensitivity near 10^{-25} eV.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astronomy and Astrophysics641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[2]
Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,Astronomy and Astrophysics641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[3]
Rubin and W.K
V.C. Rubin and W.K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,The Astrophysical Journal159(1970) 379
1970
-
[4]
van Albada, J.N
T.S. van Albada, J.N. Bahcall, K. Begeman and R. Sancisi,Distribution of dark matter in the spiral galaxy NGC 3198.,The Astrophysical Journal295(1985) 305
1985
-
[5]
Y. Sofue,Dark halos of M 31 and the Milky Way,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan67(2015) 75 [1504.05368]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[6]
G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Physics Reports 267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
-
[7]
V. Springel, S.D.M. White, A. Jenkins, C.S. Frenk, N. Yoshida, L. Gao et al.,Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars,Nature435(2005) 629 [astro-ph/0504097]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[8]
C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,Dark matter and cosmic structure,Annalen der Physik524 (2012) 507 [1210.0544]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[9]
M. Vogelsberger, S. Genel, V. Springel, P. Torrey, D. Sijacki, D. Xu et al.,Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society444(2014) 1518 [1405.2921]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[10]
D. Nelson, A. Pillepich, V. Springel, R. Weinberger, L. Hernquist, R. Pakmor et al.,First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society475(2018) 624 [1707.03395]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[11]
T. Totani,20 GeV halo-like excess of the Galactic diffuse emission and implications for dark matter annihilation,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 080 [2507.07209]
arXiv 2025
-
[12]
X. Wang and K.-K. Duan,Constraining the dark matter origin of the halo-like 20 GeVγ-ray excess with the AMS-02 antiproton data,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2512.12176 [2512.12176]
arXiv 2025
-
[13]
A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou,Small Scale Problems of theΛCDM Model: A Short Review,Galaxies5(2017) 17 [1606.07790]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[14]
J.S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin,Small-Scale Challenges to theΛCDM Paradigm,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics55(2017) 343 [1707.04256]
arXiv 2017
-
[15]
Vegetti, S.D.M
S. Vegetti, S.D.M. White, J.P. McKean, D.M. Powell, C. Spingola, D. Massari et al.,A possible challenge for cold and warm dark matter,Nature Astronomy10(2026) 440
2026
-
[16]
S. Hou, S. Xiang, Y.-L. Sming Tsai, D. Yang, Y. Shu, N. Li et al.,Flux-ratio anomalies in cusp quasars reveal dark matter beyond CDM,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2601.16818 [2601.16818]
arXiv 2026
-
[17]
W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov,Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles,Physical Review Letters85(2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[18]
Marsh,Axion cosmology,Physics Reports643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]
D.J.E. Marsh,Axion cosmology,Physics Reports643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]. – 19 –
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[19]
Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics59(2021) 247 [2101.11735]
L. Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics59(2021) 247 [2101.11735]
arXiv 2021
-
[20]
A. Eberhardt and E.G.M. Ferreira,Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2507.00705 [2507.00705]
arXiv 2025
-
[21]
A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens and O. Ruchayskiy,Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics104(2019) 1 [1807.07938]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[22]
C. Bœhm, P. Fayet and R. Schaeffer,Constraining dark matter candidates from structure formation,Physics Letters B518(2001) 8 [astro-ph/0012504]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[23]
V. Gluscevic and K.K. Boddy,Constraints on Scattering of keV-TeV Dark Matter with Protons in the Early Universe,Physical Review Letters121(2018) 081301 [1712.07133]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[24]
S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure,Physics Reports730(2018) 1 [1705.02358]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[25]
S. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, K.K. Boddy, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, H. Desmond, C. Dvorkin et al., Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,Reviews of Modern Physics97(2025) 045004 [2207.10638]
arXiv 2025
-
[26]
H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst and K.-W. Huang,Contrasting Galaxy Formation from Quantum Wave Dark Matter,ψDM, withΛCDM, using Planck and Hubble Data,The Astrophysical Journal818(2016) 89 [1508.04621]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[27]
S. Passaglia and W. Hu,Accurate effective fluid approximation for ultralight axions,Physical Review D105(2022) 123529 [2201.10238]
arXiv 2022
- [28]
-
[29]
E.Y. Davies and P. Mocz,Fuzzy dark matter soliton cores around supermassive black holes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society492(2020) 5721 [1908.04790]
arXiv 2020
-
[30]
D.J.E. Marsh and J.C. Niemeyer,Strong Constraints on Fuzzy Dark Matter from Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy Eridanus II,Physical Review Letters123(2019) 051103 [1810.08543]
arXiv 2019
-
[31]
K.K. Rogers and H.V. Peiris,Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest,Physical Review Letters126(2021) 071302 [2007.12705]
arXiv 2021
-
[32]
T. Zimmermann, J. Alvey, D.J.E. Marsh, M. Fairbairn and J.I. Read,Dwarf Galaxies Imply Dark Matter is Heavier than 2.2×10-21 eV,Physical Review Letters134(2025) 151001 [2405.20374]
arXiv 2025
- [33]
-
[34]
J. Liu, Y. Gong and K. Liao,Joint Constraints on Fuzzy and Warm Dark Matter from Satellite Populations of the Milky Way and Andromeda,The Astrophysical Journal1000 (2026) 88 [2512.01361]
arXiv 2026
-
[35]
P. Mocz, A. Fialkov, M. Vogelsberger, M. Boylan-Kolchin, P.-H. Chavanis, M.A. Amin et al., Cosmological structure formation and soliton phase transition in fuzzy dark matter with axion self-interactions,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society521(2023) 2608 [2301.10266]
arXiv 2023
-
[36]
H.Y.J. Chan, H.-Y. Schive, V.H. Robles, A. Kunkel, G.-M. Su and P.-Y. Liao,Cosmological zoom-in simulation of fuzzy dark matter down to z = 0: tidal evolution of subhaloes in a Milky Way-sized halo,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society540(2025) 2653 [2504.10387]. – 20 –
arXiv 2025
-
[37]
D. Wardana, K. Hayashi, M. Chiba and E.G.M. Ferreira,Fuzzy Dark Matter and the Impact of Core-Halo Diversity on Its Particle Mass Constraints,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2603.07175 [2603.07175]
arXiv 2026
-
[38]
Y. Liu and X. Li,Tidal Heating of Stellar Clusters in Fuzzy Dark Matter Halos,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2604.26393 [2604.26393]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[39]
M. Gosenca, A. Eberhardt, Y. Wang, B. Eggemeier, E. Kendall, J.L. Zagorac et al.,Multifield ultralight dark matter,Physical Review D107(2023) 083014 [2301.07114]
arXiv 2023
-
[40]
D.M. Powell, S. Vegetti, J.P. McKean, S.D.M. White, E.G.M. Ferreira, S. May et al.,A lensed radio jet at milli-arcsecond resolution - II. Constraints on fuzzy dark matter from an extended gravitational arc,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524(2023) L84 [2302.10941]
arXiv 2023
- [41]
-
[42]
H. Winch, K.K. Rogers, R. Hloˇ zek and D.J.E. Marsh,High-redshift, Small-scale Tests of Ultralight Axion Dark Matter Using Hubble and Webb Galaxy UV Luminosities,The Astrophysical Journal976(2024) 40 [2404.11071]
arXiv 2024
-
[43]
M. McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54(2016) 313 [1512.00086]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[44]
Tejos,The intergalactic medium, inEncyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 4, vol
N. Tejos,The intergalactic medium, inEncyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 4, vol. 4, pp. 401–432, Jan., 2026, DOI [2504.12539]
arXiv 2026
-
[45]
M. Viel, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and M.G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data,Physical Review D 88(2013) 043502 [1306.2314]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[46]
A. Garzilli, A. Boyarsky and O. Ruchayskiy,Cutoff in the Lyman-αforest power spectrum: Warm IGM or warm dark matter?,Physics Letters B773(2017) 258 [1510.07006]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[47]
V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G.D. Becker et al.,New constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data,Physical Review D96(2017) 023522 [1702.01764]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[48]
E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, D.J.E. Marsh and J. Baur,Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-αforest,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society471(2017) 4606 [1703.09126]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[49]
T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe,Physical Review D 96(2017) 123514 [1708.00015]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[50]
V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton and G.D. Becker,First Constraints on Fuzzy Dark Matter from Lyman-αForest Data and Hydrodynamical Simulations,Physical Review Letters119(2017) 031302 [1703.04683]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[51]
R. Murgia, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Novel constraints on noncold, nonthermal dark matter from Lyman-αforest data,Physical Review D98(2018) 083540 [1806.08371]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
- [52]
-
[53]
B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider,New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman-αforest power spectrum,Physical Review D108(2023) 023502 [2209.14220]. – 21 –
arXiv 2023
-
[54]
V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton, M. Molaro, E. Puchwein et al.,Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,Physical Review D109(2024) 043511 [2309.04533]
arXiv 2024
-
[55]
O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M.G. Haehnelt, M. Viel and J.S. Bolton,Constraining mixed dark matter models with high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest data,Physical Review D112(2025) 043502 [2504.06367]
arXiv 2025
-
[56]
S.-Y. Zhao, Y.-C. Dai, W. Liao and Y.-S. Lu,Lyman-αForest Constraint on Dark Matter from Dark Sector Decay,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2603.24331 [2603.24331]
arXiv 2026
-
[57]
O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt and J.S. Bolton,Post-inflationary axion constraints from the Lyman-αforest,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2603.04401 [2603.04401]
arXiv 2026
-
[58]
M.M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Physical Review D 109(2024) 023507 [2309.10133]
arXiv 2024
-
[59]
M.M. Ivanov and S. Trifinopoulos,Effective Field Theory Constraints on Primordial Black Holes from the High-Redshift Lyman-αForest,Physical Review Letters136(2026) 171402 [2508.04767]
arXiv 2026
-
[60]
E. Boera, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and F. Nasir,Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the LyαFlux Power Spectrum, The Astrophysical Journal872(2019) 101 [1809.06980]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[61]
Dekker, S
H. Dekker, S. D’Odorico, A. Kaufer, B. Delabre and H. Kotzlowski,Design, construction, and performance of UVES, the echelle spectrograph for the UT2 Kueyen Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory, inOptical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, M. Iye and A.F. Moorwood, eds., vol. 4008 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)...
2000
-
[62]
Vogt, S.L
S.S. Vogt, S.L. Allen, B.C. Bigelow, L. Bresee, B. Brown, T. Cantrall et al.,HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope, inInstrumentation in Astronomy VIII, D.L. Crawford and E.R. Craine, eds., vol. 2198 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, p. 362, June, 1994, DOI
1994
-
[63]
L. Hui, N.Y. Gnedin and Y. Zhang,The Statistics of Density Peaks and the Column Density Distribution of the LyαForest,The Astrophysical Journal486(1997) 599 [astro-ph/9608157]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
-
[64]
L. Hui and N.Y. Gnedin,Equation of state of the photoionized intergalactic medium,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society292(1997) 27 [astro-ph/9612232]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
-
[65]
N.Y. Gnedin and L. Hui,Probing the Universe with the Lyalpha forest - I. Hydrodynamics of the low-density intergalactic medium,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society296 (1998) 44 [astro-ph/9706219]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[66]
N.Y. Gnedin and A.J.S. Hamilton,Matter power spectrum from the Lyman-alpha forest: myth or reality?,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society334(2002) 107 [astro-ph/0111194]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[67]
N.Y. Gnedin, E.J. Baker, T.J. Bethell, M.M. Drosback, A.G. Harford, A.K. Hicks et al., Linear Gas Dynamics in the Expanding Universe,The Astrophysical Journal583(2003) 525 [astro-ph/0206421]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[68]
G. Kulkarni, J.F. Hennawi, J. O˜ norbe, A. Rorai and V. Springel,Characterizing the Pressure Smoothing Scale of the Intergalactic Medium,The Astrophysical Journal812(2015) 30 [1504.00366]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[69]
F. Nasir, J.S. Bolton and G.D. Becker,Inferring the IGM thermal history during reionization with the Lyman-αforest power spectrum at redshift z≃5,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society463(2016) 2335 [1605.04155]. – 22 –
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[70]
J.S. Bolton and M.G. Haehnelt,The nature and evolution of the highly ionized near-zones in the absorption spectra ofz∼6quasars,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 374(2007) 493 [astro-ph/0607331]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[71]
J.S. Bolton, M.G. Haehnelt, M. Viel and V. Springel,The Lymanαforest opacity and the metagalactic hydrogen ionization rate atz∼2−4,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society357(2005) 1178 [astro-ph/0411072]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[72]
P. Bode, J.P. Ostriker and N. Turok,Halo Formation in Warm Dark Matter Models,The Astrophysical Journal556(2001) 93 [astro-ph/0010389]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[73]
X. Li, L. Hui and G.L. Bryan,Numerical and perturbative computations of the fuzzy dark matter model,Physical Review D99(2019) 063509 [1810.01915]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[74]
M. Nori, R. Murgia, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Baldi and M. Viel,Lyman-αforest and non-linear structure characterization in Fuzzy Dark Matter cosmologies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society482(2019) 3227 [1809.09619]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[75]
Y.F. Wang,Lyman-αForest Signatures of Mixed Fuzzy and Cold Dark Matter,arXiv e-prints (2026) arXiv:2604.06038 [2604.06038]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[76]
K.K. Rogers and H.V. Peiris,General framework for cosmological dark matter bounds using N -body simulations,Physical Review D103(2021) 043526 [2007.13751]
arXiv 2021
-
[77]
Y. Feng, S. Bird, L. Anderson, A. Font-Ribera and C. Pedersen,Mp-gadget/mp-gadget: A tag for getting a doi, Oct., 2018. 10.5281/zenodo.1451799
-
[78]
S. Bird, Y. Ni, T. Di Matteo, R. Croft, Y. Feng and N. Chen,The ASTRID simulation: galaxy formation and reionization,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society512 (2022) 3703 [2111.01160]
arXiv 2022
-
[79]
Y. Ni, T. Di Matteo, S. Bird, R. Croft, Y. Feng, N. Chen et al.,The ASTRID simulation: the evolution of supermassive black holes,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513 (2022) 670 [2110.14154]
arXiv 2022
-
[80]
S. Bird, Y. Feng, C. Pedersen and A. Font-Ribera,More accurate simulations with separate initial conditions for baryons and dark matter,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(2020) 002 [2002.00015]
arXiv 2020
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.