Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Dynamics and leapfrogging phenomena of multiple helical vortices for 3D incompressible Euler equations

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that sharply concentrated helical vortex tubes in an ideal fluid move, to leading order, according to an explicit ODE, and that two close tubes can overtake each other repeatedly over many periods.

desk verdict A genuinely new multi-helix ODE reduction and a serious proof effort, but the central ODE is mis-derived: the constants A and B in (1.16) do not match the transformation of (2.13), so Theorem 1.2 as stated is not supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12240 v4 pith:P6FIAVBD submitted 2025-05-18 math.AP

Daomin Cao , Junhong Fan , Guolin Qin , Jie Wan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 76B4737N10
keywords helicalvortexincompressibleEulerequationsfilamentdynamicsleapfroggingKelvinwavesGreen'sfunctiondecompositionconcentrationestimatesanisotropicellipticoperator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies several thin helical vortex tubes in an ideal (inviscid, incompressible) three-dimensional fluid, with the initial vorticity concentrated in $N$ disjoint $\varepsilon$-neighborhoods whose mutual separations shrink like $O(1/|\ln\varepsilon|)$ and whose masses scale like $1/|\ln\varepsilon|^{1+b}$. It claims that as $\varepsilon\to 0$, the rescaled centers of these tubes converge uniformly, on a time interval of order $1/|\ln\varepsilon|^{1-b}$, to the solution of an explicit ODE system that is derived in the paper. This ODE is the helical analogue of point-vortex dynamics, mixing pairwise interactions with a self-induced drift of equal order. In the case of two tubes, choosing the initial distance small enough extends the validity over arbitrarily many periods of that ODE, which the paper presents as the first mathematical justification of the numerically observed 'leapfrogging of Kelvin waves'.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the refined Green's function decomposition for the anisotropic operator $L_K=\operatorname{div}(K\nabla)$, where $K$ is the symmetric positive-definite matrix encoding the helical metric: $G_K(x,y)=H(x,y)\ln|T(x)-T(y)|+S_K(x,y)$, with $T(x)=\tau(|x|^2)x$ a $C^1$ deformation and $S_K$ a remainder with locally bounded gradient. This turns the Biot-Savart velocity into a logarithmic pairwise kernel in the deformed coordinates, which is why the limiting ODE is written for the transformed centers $\tilde P_i=DT(x_0)P_i$. The second mechanism is an iterative energy/localization argument that bounds the vorticity mass outside shrinking disks; the key innovation is to measure distance and cutoffs in the transformed coordinates, using $W_{R,\zeta}(DT(x_0)(x-B_{i,\varepsilon}(t)))$ and $|DT(x_0)(x-B_{i,\varepsilon}(t))|$, so that the anisotropy of $L_K$ produces the cancellations needed for the concentration estimates.

What would settle it

Explicitly compute or numerically evaluate the remainder $S_K$ of the Green's function on $\mathbb R^2$ (for example from the Fourier-series formula in [10]) and test whether $\nabla_x S_K$ and $\nabla_y S_K$ remain uniformly bounded on the annular regions used in estimates (3.27)--(3.28), including the limit $r_0\to\infty$ where $K$ degenerates; if a divergent gradient is found, the key localization lemmas do not hold and the convergence to (1.16) is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the leading-order motion of $N$ interacting helical vortices without swirl is a finite-dimensional dynamical system, not a set of independent filament laws. After the rescaled centers $P_i$ are transformed by $\tilde P_i=DT(x_0)P_i$, the limiting equations read $\partial_t\tilde P_i=A\sum_{j\ne i}a_j(\tilde P_i-\tilde P_j)^\perp/|\tilde P_i-\tilde P_j|^2-a_iB\binom{0}{1}$, with positive constants $A,B$ depending only on the common radius $r_0$ and pitch $h$. The interaction and self-induced terms are comparable because the initial separations are taken to vanish at the same logarithmic rate as the core thickness, in contrast with earlier settings where interactions were negligible. For $N=2$ and $a_1+a_2\ne0$, the relative vector $x=\tilde P_1-\tilde P_2$ evolves in the Hamiltonian $\mathcal H(x)=\frac{a_1+a_2}{4\pi}A_1\ln|x|^2-\frac{a_1-a_2}{4\pi}B_1x_1$, whose closed orbits give periodic overtaking; the paper proves that for sufficiently small initial separation the Euler solution follows these orbits for more than $k$ periods.

Load-bearing premise

The entire proof rests on the refined Green's function decomposition $G_K(x,y)=H(x,y)\ln|T(x)-T(y)|+S_K(x,y)$ holding on the whole plane $\mathbb R^2$ with the pointwise gradient bounds used in (3.27)--(3.28), but the paper cites [23] for this decomposition while [23] treats bounded domains, and the $\mathbb R^2$ version with the needed uniformity is not proved here; if that decomposition fails, the energy, concentration, and velocity estimates collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the main theorems are correct, the long-time dynamics of $N$ interacting helical vortices with vanishing separation is reduced to the explicit ODE (1.16), so questions about clustering, collisions, and periodic orbits become finite-dimensional.
  • For $b=-1$ the result supplies the evolution counterpart of the interacting vortex-helix configurations constructed in [28]: those clusters move according to the derived ODE rather than remaining static.
  • For two helices with $a_1+a_2\neq0$ and sufficiently small initial distance, the vorticity remains concentrated in disjoint shrinking disks for more than $k$ periods of the relative motion, giving repeated leapfrogging.
  • The period of the relative motion satisfies $T_E\approx 4\pi^2 C_E/((a_1+a_2)A_1)$ for small energy levels, tending to zero as the initial separation shrinks, so the number of overtakings in a fixed time can be made arbitrarily large.
  • The convergence is uniform on a time interval independent of $\varepsilon$ (and extended in the two-helix case), so the ODE is a genuine scaling limit of the Euler equations rather than a formal approximation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the approximately elliptical orbits of the separation vector $P_1-P_2$ derived in Section 5 are a distinguishing signature: helical leapfrogging should display an elliptical precession rather than the circular orbits familiar from planar point vortices, which could be checked in existing simulations.
  • We infer that the parameter $b$ sweeps a family of scaling regimes, with $b=-1$ matching the stationary cluster constructions and other values giving shorter or longer validity windows; this suggests an order-of-limits question about whether the same ODE persists when separations are much larger than $1/|\ln\varepsilon|$.
  • We infer that the $DT(x_0)$-transformed localization technique is a general recipe for anisotropic desingularization problems whose Green's function has a logarithmic singularity deformed by a diffeomorphism, and may extend to bounded domains or other helical metrics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations in helical symmetry without swirl, reduced to the two-dimensional transport problem (1.7) with the anisotropic operator L_K = div(K(x)∇). The authors consider N vortex patches that are initially concentrated on scale ε, separated by distances of order 1/|ln ε|, and carrying masses of order 1/|ln ε|^{1+b} for arbitrary b ∈ R. The main result, Theorem 1.2, claims that as ε → 0 the rescaled centers converge uniformly on time scales of order 1/|ln ε|^{1-b} to the first-order ODE system (1.16) with the explicit constants A and B given in (1.17). Theorem 1.6 claims that for two vortices with sufficiently small initial separation the same convergence holds over several periods, thereby providing a rigorous derivation of the numerically observed leapfrogging of Kelvin waves. The proof combines conservation of energy, iterative concentration estimates, a refined Green's function decomposition, and comparison with the limiting ODE.

Significance. If correct, the intended result would be significant: it would provide the first rigorous derivation of an interacting multiple-helix dynamics and the first mathematical justification of leapfrogging of helical vortex filaments. The paper has identifiable strengths: the constants in the proposed ODE are explicit and no parameters are fitted to data, the reduced 2D formulation is used carefully, and the proof attempts to handle the anisotropic operator through a coordinate transformation. However, the central ODE constants are algebraically inconsistent with the formal derivation, and the proof relies on an unproved R^2 version of the Green's function decomposition. These issues are load-bearing for Theorems 1.2 and 1.6, so the significance cannot be realized as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.13) and Eq. (1.17)] The change of variables \tilde P_i = DT(x0)P_i is applied incorrectly to equation (2.13). Writing DT(x0)=diag(α,β) with α=τ(r0^2)(1+r0^2/(h^2+h√(h^2+r0^2))) and β=τ(r0^2), the interaction term transforms by multiplication with det(DT(x0))=τ(r0^2)^2(1+r0^2/(h^2+h√(h^2+r0^2))), because DT(x0)((DT(x0)^2z)^⊥) = det(DT(x0))(DT(x0)z)^⊥. The resulting coefficient is therefore H(x0,x0)τ(r0^2)^2(1+r0^2/(h^2+h√(h^2+r0^2))), whereas A in (1.17) omits the factor τ(r0^2)^2. Similarly, the self-interaction term in the transformed system has second component a_i τ(r0^2) r0/(2πh√(h^2+r0^2)), not a_i τ(r0^2) r0/(4πh√(h^2+r0^2)) as in (1.17). Thus the system actually derived from (2.13) is not the system (1.16)-(1.17) stated in Theorem 1.2. This is a load-bearing error because the comparisons involving D_i^3 and D_i^5 in Section 4.2 use the constants A and B from (1.17).
  2. [Proposition 2.1] The refined decomposition G_K(x,y)=H(x,y) ln|T(x)-T(y)| + S_K(x,y) with S_K∈W^{1,∞}_{loc}(R^2×R^2) is attributed to [23], but the authors themselves note in Remark 1.4 that [23] treats bounded domains. The R^2 version and the associated pointwise gradient estimates used in (3.27), (3.28), (4.10), and Lemma 3.5 are not proved in this paper. Since the energy lower bound, the velocity decomposition (3.25), and the subsequent localization arguments all depend on this decomposition, the proof currently rests on an unverified input. This is a correctness-risk concern rather than a demonstrated contradiction, but it must be resolved before the main result can be accepted.
  3. [Section 5, Eq. (5.2)] The constants used in the two-helix Hamiltonian are inconsistent with (1.17). The constant A1 defined after (5.2) equals 2π det(DT(x0))H(x0,x0), i.e. it contains the factor τ^2 that is missing from A in (1.17), and B1 equals twice B in (1.17). Consequently the periodic orbits and the period TE used in Theorem 1.6 are those of the corrected ODE, not of the ODE (1.16)-(1.17) that is the subject of Theorem 1.2. This internal inconsistency confirms that the mismatch identified in the first major comment is not merely typographical.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.20) and (3.23)] The symbol B_{i,ε}(t) is used both for the center of vorticity in (3.20) and for a disk in (3.23); this double use is confusing and should be repaired in a revision.
  2. [Section 5, Eq. (5.5)] The asymptotic estimate TE≈4π^2 C_E/((a1+a2)A1) is stated without justification; a short explanation of the limiting integration would improve readability.
  3. [Section 4.1, around Eq. (4.13)] There are small typographical errors in the displayed formulas, for example an unmatched parenthesis in the expression involving "ln|T(x1)-T(y)ω" before (4.14); the paper would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the limiting ODE is derived from the Biot–Savart law and the concentration ansatz is later proved independently via energy estimates.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that sharply concentrated helical vorticity converges to the ODE system (1.16). The formal derivation in Section 2.2 explicitly assumes concentration, stating in Proposition 1.1 that the result is formal because the vortices are assumed to 'remain concentrated' without proof. This assumption is not used as an input to the final theorem: the bulk of the paper (Sections 3–4) proves the needed concentration estimates from the Euler dynamics, conservation of energy, and the assumed initial data. Thus the final theorem does not reduce to its own conclusion. The constants A and B in (1.17) are explicit functions of h, r0, and τ, and no parameter is fitted to the data or to the numerically observed leapfrogging. The Green's function decomposition in Proposition 2.1 is taken from external literature, including [23] by Donati–Lacave–Miot (not the present authors), and from [10, 12, 14] by overlapping authors; these citations concern Green's function expansions and regularity, not the target dynamical law, and they are not used as a substitute for deriving the ODE. Even if the R^2 version of the decomposition were insufficiently justified in the text, that is a completeness or correctness concern, not circularity. The leapfrogging statement in Theorem 1.6 follows from the periodic solutions of the derived ODE and an iterative localization argument, again with no fitted input. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to its own input, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Green's function decomposition for the anisotropic operator L_K and on the well-posedness of the reduced helical problem; both are taken from prior work, including papers by the same authors. No parameters are fitted to data. The internal inconsistency in A is a flaw in the transcription of the derivation, not an extra postulated entity.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Green's function for L_K on R^2 admits the decomposition G_K(x,y)=H(x,y)ln|T(x)-T(y)|+S_K(x,y) with S_K in W^{1,infinity}_{loc}(R^2 x R^2), giving pointwise gradient bounds (Proposition 2.1, used in (2.5), (3.27), (3.28)).
    Quoted from [23] for bounded domains and [10,12,14]; the R^2 version is not proved in this paper, and the uniformity in epsilon is load-bearing for all energy and velocity estimates.
  • domain assumption The reduced 2D system (1.7) is globally well-posed for the considered concentrated initial data (cited from [1,3,24,25,29,38]).
    The dynamics are studied in the 2D representation; if the reduction or well-posedness failed, the concentration and convergence statements would not make sense.
  • domain assumption The vorticity of each initial helix has a definite sign and the mass scaling (1.11) holds for an arbitrary fixed b in R.
    This is stated as the main hypothesis (1.9)-(1.12); the proof relies on preserving the sign to use absolute values in the estimates, for example in Proposition 3.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics and leapfrogging phenomena of multiple helical vortices for 3D incompressible Euler equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P6FIAVBD

@misc{pith2026250512240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics and leapfrogging phenomena of multiple helical vortices for 3D incompressible Euler equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P6FIAVBD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12240}
}
abstract

In this paper, we investigate the time evolution of helical vortices without swirl for the incompressible Euler equations in $\mathbb R^3$ under general initial assumptions. Assume the initial helical vorticity is sharply concentrated in $N$ distinct $\ep$-neighborhoods, whose mutual distances vanish as $O(1/|\ln \ep|)$, and each vortex core possesses vorticity mass of order $1/|\ln \ep|^{1+b}$ for an arbitrary fixed $b\in\mathbb R$. We prove that as $\ep\to 0$, the motion of these helical vortices converges uniformly to a dynamical system derived herein over a time interval of order $1/|\ln\varepsilon|^{1-b}$. In the particular case $b=-1$, our results establish the evolution counterpart for interacting vortex helices constructed in [I. Guerra, M. Musso, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'aire, 2025]. Notably, for two interacting helical vortices with initial mutual distance $ \rho_0/|\ln \ep|$, by choosing $\rho_0$ sufficiently small, our analysis extends to timescales covering multiple periods. This result provides the first mathematical justification for the numerically observed phenomenon termed ``leapfrogging of Kelvin waves" reported in [N. Hietala et al., Phys. Rev. Fluids, 2016].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stability of oppositely-propagating pair of Hill's spherical vortices

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An odd-symmetric pair of Hill's spherical vortices is globally stable in 3D axisymmetric Euler flow, with propagation speed close to the single-vortex speed and a sharp linear error estimate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [23]

    Donati, C

    M. Donati, C. Lacave and E. Miot, Dynamics of helical vortex filaments in non viscous incompressible flows, accepted by Bull. Soc. Math. France, arXiv:2403.00389

    arXiv

  2. [30]

    Guo and L

    D. Guo and L. Zhao, Long time dynamics for helical vortex filament in Euler flows, Preprint, arXiv:2403.09071, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Abidi and S

    H. Abidi and S. Sakrani, Global well-posedness of helicoidal Euler equations, J. Funct. Anal. , 271 (2016), no. 8, 2177–2214

    work page 2016

  4. [2]

    Benedetto, E

    D. Benedetto, E. Caglioti and C. Marchioro, On the motion of a vortex ring with a sharply concentrated vorticity, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 23 (2000), no. 2, 147–168

    work page 2000

  5. [3]

    A. C. Bronzi, M. C. Lopes Filho and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, Global existence of a weak solution of the incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry and Lp vorticity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 64 (2015), no. 1, 309–341

    work page 2015

  6. [4]

    Butt` a, G

    P. Butt` a, G. Cavallaro and C. Marchioro, Global time evolution of concentrated vortex rings, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 70, 24 pp

    work page 2022

  7. [5]

    Butt` a, G

    P. Butt` a, G. Cavallaro and C. Marchioro, Long time evolution of concentrated vortex rings with large radius, J. Stat. Phys. , 191 (2024), no. 12, Paper No. 164, 24 pp

    work page 2024

  8. [6]

    Butt` a, G

    P. Butt` a, G. Cavallaro and C. Marchioro, Vanishing viscosity limit for concentrated vortex rings. J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), no. 12, Paper No. 123103, 23 pp

    work page 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [7]

    Butt` a, G

    P. Butt` a, G. Cavallaro and C. Marchioro, Leapfrogging vortex rings as scaling limit of Euler equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 57 (2025), no. 1, 789–824

    2025

  2. [8]

    Butt` aand C

    P. Butt` aand C. Marchioro, Long time evolution of concentrated Euler flows with planar symmetry, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 50 (2018), 735–760

    2018

  3. [9]

    Butt` aand C

    P. Butt` aand C. Marchioro, Time evolution of concentrated vortex rings, J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 22 (2020), no. 2, Paper No. 19, 21 pp

    2020

  4. [10]

    D. Cao, B. Fan, R. Li and G. Qin, Helical Kelvin waves for the 3D Euler equation, Preprint, arXiv:2411.02055

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    D. Cao, J. Fan, G. Qin, J. Wan, Dynamics of helical vortex filaments with singular interaction for the 3D Euler equations. Preprint, in preparation, 2025. MULTIPLE HELICAL VORTICES 43

    2025

  6. [12]

    D. Cao, R. Li, G. Qin and J. Wan, Existence of helical symmetry vortex patch with small cross-section for the incompressible Euler equations in R3, J. Diff. Equat. , 418 (2025), 459–495

    2025

  7. [13]

    Cao and J

    D. Cao and J. Wan, Structure of Green’s function of elliptic equations and helical vortex patches for 3D incompressible Euler equations, Math. Ann., 388 (2024), 2627–2669

    2024

  8. [14]

    Cao and J

    D. Cao and J. Wan, Expansion of Green’s function and regularity of Robin’s function for elliptic operators in divergence form, to appear in Ann.Scuola Normale-Pisa, (2025), arXiv:2401.11486

    2025 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Castillo-Castellanos and S

    A. Castillo-Castellanos and S. Le Diz´ es, Closely spaced co-rotating helical vortices: long-wave instability, J. Fluid Mech. , 946 (2022), Paper No. A10, 28 pp

    2022

  10. [16]

    Choi, I.J

    K. Choi, I.J. Jeong, Y. Yao, Stability of vortex quadrupoles with odd-odd symmetry. arXiv:2409.19822, (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    D´ avila, M

    J. D´ avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso and J. Wei, Travelling helices and the vortex filament conjecture in the incompressible Euler equations, Calc. Var.& PDEs, 61 (2022), no.4, Paper No. 119, 30 pp

    2022

  12. [18]

    D´ avila, M

    J. D´ avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso and J. Wei, Leapfrogging vortex rings for the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 77 (2024), no. 10, 3843–3957

    2024

  13. [19]

    Da Rios, Sul moto d’un liquido indefinito con un filetto vorticoso di forma qualunque, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) , 22 (1906), no

    L.S. Da Rios, Sul moto d’un liquido indefinito con un filetto vorticoso di forma qualunque, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) , 22 (1906), no. 1, 117–135

    1906

  14. [20]

    Delbende, C

    I. Delbende, C. Sel¸ cuk and M. Rossi, Nonlinear dynamics of two helical vortices: A dynamical system approach, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (2021), 084701

    2021

  15. [21]

    Donati, L

    M. Donati, L. E. Hientzsch, C. Lacave and E. Miot, On the dynamics of leapfrogging vortex rings, Preprint, arXiv:2503.21604, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Donati and C

    M. Donati and C. Lacave, Long time confinement of vorticity around a stable stationary point vortex in a bounded planar domain, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 38 (2021), no. 5, 1461–1485

    2021

  17. [24]

    Dutrifoy, Existence globale en temps de solutions h ´ elico¨idales des ´ equations d’Euler, C

    A. Dutrifoy, Existence globale en temps de solutions h ´ elico¨idales des ´ equations d’Euler, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S ´er. I Math. , 329 (1999), no. 7, 653–656

    1999

  18. [25]

    Ettinger and E.S

    B. Ettinger and E.S. Titi, Global existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry in the absence of vorticity stretching, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 41 (2009), no. 1, 269–296

    2009

  19. [26]

    M. A. Fontelos and L. Vega, Evolution of viscous vortex filaments and desingularization of the Biot-Savart integral. Preprint, arXiv:2311.12246

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Gallay, V

    T. Gallay, V. ˇSver´ ak, Vanishing viscosity limit for axisymmetric vortex rings. Invent. Math. , 237, 275–348 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    Guerra and M

    I. Guerra and M. Musso, Cluster of vortex helices in the incompressible 3d Euler equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 42 (2025), no. 3, 547–592

    2025

  22. [29]

    Guo and L

    D. Guo and L. Zhao, Global well-posedness of weak solutions to the incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry in R3, J. Diff. Equat. , 416 (2025), part 1, 806–868

    2025

  23. [31]

    Hassainia, T

    Z. Hassainia, T. Hmidi and N. Masmoudi, Rigorous derivation of the leapfrogging motion for planar Euler equations, Preprint, arXiv :2311.15765, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hietala, R

    N. Hietala, R. H¨ anninen H. Salman and C. F. Barenghi, Leapfrogging Kelvin waves, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (2016), 084501

    2016

  25. [33]

    Helmholtz, On integrals of the hydrodynamics equations which express vortex motion, J

    H. Helmholtz, On integrals of the hydrodynamics equations which express vortex motion, J. Reine Angew. Math., 55 (1858), 25–55. (English translation by P. G. Tait: Phil. Mag. , Ser. 4, 33 (1867), 485–512

  26. [34]

    Levi-Civita, Sull’attrazione esercitata da una linea materiale in punti prossimi alla linea stessa, Rend

    T. Levi-Civita, Sull’attrazione esercitata da una linea materiale in punti prossimi alla linea stessa, Rend. R. Acc. Lincei, 17 (1908), 3–15

    1908

  27. [35]

    Levi-Civita, Attrazione newtoniana dei tubi sottili e vortici filiformi, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze Ser

    T. Levi-Civita, Attrazione newtoniana dei tubi sottili e vortici filiformi, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze Ser. 2 , 1 (1932), no. 3, 229–250. 44 DAOMIN CAO, JUNHONG F AN, GUOLIN QIN, JIE W AN

    1932

  28. [36]

    Jerrard and C

    R.L. Jerrard and C. Seis, On the vortex filament conjecture for Euler flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 224 (2017), no. 1, 135–172

    2017

  29. [37]

    Jerrard and C

    R.L. Jerrard and C. Seis, Leapfrogging vortex rings for the three dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Ann. PDE, 4 (2018), no. 1, Paper No. 4, 48 pp

    2018

  30. [38]

    Q. Jiu, J. Li and D. Niu, Global existence of weak solutions to the three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry, J. Diff. Equat. , 262 (2017), no. 10, 5179–5205

    2017

  31. [39]

    Marchioro and M

    C. Marchioro and M. Pulvirenti, Vortices and localization in Euler flows, Comm. Math. Phys. , 154 (1) (1993), 49–61

    1993

  32. [40]

    Turkington, On the evolution of a concentrated vortex in an ideal fluid, Arch

    B. Turkington, On the evolution of a concentrated vortex in an ideal fluid, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 97(1987), no. 1, 75–87. State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P.R. China and...

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.