Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04459 v1 pith:PERNGABW submitted 2023-06-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords uncertaintyfieldlanguagenaturalnetworksneuralreviewapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As a main field of artificial intelligence, natural language processing (NLP) has achieved remarkable success via deep neural networks. Plenty of NLP tasks have been addressed in a unified manner, with various tasks being associated with each other through sharing the same paradigm. However, neural networks are black boxes and rely on probability computation. Making mistakes is inevitable. Therefore, estimating the reliability and trustworthiness (in other words, uncertainty) of neural networks becomes a key research direction, which plays a crucial role in reducing models' risks and making better decisions. Therefore, in this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of uncertainty-relevant works in the NLP field. Considering the data and paradigms characteristics, we first categorize the sources of uncertainty in natural language into three types, including input, system, and output. Then, we systemically review uncertainty quantification approaches and the main applications. Finally, we discuss the challenges of uncertainty estimation in NLP and discuss potential future directions, taking into account recent trends in the field. Though there have been a few surveys about uncertainty estimation, our work is the first to review uncertainty from the NLP perspective.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 11 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UCerF scores LLM fairness by both correctness and confidence, and SynthBias provides 31,756 gender-occupation coreference samples for benchmark testing.

  2. Bridging Distribution Shift and AI Safety: Conceptual and Methodological Synergies

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a one-to-one mapping between six causes of distribution shift and several AI safety issues, arguing for mutual method transfer through aligned definitions.

  3. Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Space

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free method that feeds probability-weighted token embeddings back into LLMs during reasoning, improving accuracy and token efficiency on math and coding tasks.

  4. Challenges in Understanding Modality Conflict in Vision-Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In LLaVA-OV-7B, a linearly decodable conflict signal appears in intermediate layers and detection-related attention shifts precede resolution-related ones, supporting a detection/resolution separation in the model.

Pith tools