Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Global existence for small amplitude semilinear wave equations with time-dependent scale-invariant damping

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For n≥3 and μ∈(0,1)∪(1,2), small data on the scale-invariant damped wave equation produce global weak solutions whenever the power p lies strictly above the critical exponent and at most the conformal exponent.

desk verdict Sharp-range global existence with a load-bearing gap at alpha=0 in Lemma 2.3; the main theorem is not fully proved as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01670 v1 pith:PIDDCHZH submitted 2025-01-03 math.AP

Daoyin He , Yaqing Sun , Kangqun Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L7035L6535L67
keywords globalexistencescale-invariantdampingsemilinearwaveequationgeneralizedTricomiweightedStrichartzestimatescriticalexponentFourierintegraloperatorweaksolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a sharp global existence result for the semilinear wave equation with scale-invariant damping, $\partial_t^2 u - \Delta u + \frac{\mu}{t}\partial_t u = |u|^p$, for dimensions $n\ge 3$ and damping parameters $\mu \in (0,1)\cup(1,2)$. The claim is that for small, smooth, compactly supported initial data, a global weak solution $u$ exists for every nonlinear power $p$ satisfying $p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,\mu) < p \le p_{\mathrm{conf}}(n,\mu)$, where $p_{\mathrm{crit}}$ is the positive root of $(n+\mu-1)p^2-(n+\mu+1)p-2=0$ and $p_{\mathrm{conf}}=(n+\mu+3)/(n+\mu-1)$. If correct, this pins down the global-existence threshold for this equation over the whole stated parameter range, matching the range where blow-up is known. The proof converts the damped wave equation into a generalized Tricomi equation and establishes new weighted Strichartz estimates for that equation.

What carries the argument

The loaded tool is the weighted Strichartz estimate for the inhomogeneous generalized Tricomi equation, Theorem 1.3: with $\varphi_m(t)=\frac{2}{m+2}t^{\frac{m+2}{2}}$, the estimate $\left\|(\varphi_m(t)^2-|x|^2)^{\gamma_1} t^{\alpha/q} w\right\|_{L^q} \le C \left\|(\varphi_m(t)^2-|x|^2)^{\gamma_2} t^{-\alpha/q} F\right\|_{L^{q/(q-1)}}$ holds for $2\le q\le q_0=\frac{2((m+2)n+2+2\alpha)}{(m+2)n-2}$ with admissible $\gamma_1,\gamma_2$. The proof splits the space-time domain by the size of $\varphi_m(t)-|x|$ into small-, medium-, and large-$\delta$ regions; in the medium region it introduces Fourier integral operators $T_z$ and $\tilde T_z$ (with $z$ on lines depending on $\alpha$) and applies complex interpolation between an $L^1\to L^\infty$ estimate from stationary phase and an $L^2\to L^2$ estimate with product weights $(\varphi_m(t)+|x|)^{\beta_1}(\varphi_m(t)-|x|)^{\beta_2}$. The homogeneous estimate Lemma 2.1, built on the pointwise decay bound quoted from the authors' earlier work [17], supplies the seed term in the Picard iteration of Theorem 1.2.

What would settle it

For a concrete test, take $n=3$, $m=1$, $\alpha=0$ (so $q_0=22/7$), choose $F$ supported in the shell $\varphi_1(t)-|x|\in[1,2]$, and check numerically whether the weighted $L^{q_0}$ bound of Theorem 1.3 holds with the stated $\gamma_1,\gamma_2$. Failure would falsify the central estimate; alternatively, a rigorous verification of whether the pointwise decay bound (2-20) from [17] holds with the stated exponents for all $n\ge 2$, $m>0$, $\alpha>-1$ would settle the weakest link, which the paper itself flags by noting the method breaks down when $\alpha\le -1$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the threshold for global small-data existence for the scale-invariant damped wave equation coincides with the critical exponent $p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,\mu)$, the positive root of $(n+\mu-1)p^2-(n+\mu+1)p-2=0$, for every $\mu \in (0,1)\cup(1,2)$ and all $n\ge 3$, not merely for large powers. The authors prove Theorem 1.1 by establishing the equivalent generalized Tricomi problem $\partial_t^2 v - t^m \Delta v = t^\alpha |v|^p$ has a global weak solution for $p \in (p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,m,\alpha), p_{\mathrm{conf}}(n,m,\alpha)]$ (Theorem 1.2), where $p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,m,\alpha)$ is a quadratic-root critical exponent that reduces to $p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,\mu)$ in both cases $\mu\in(0,1)$ and $\mu\in(1,2)$. The essential new input is a pair of weighted Strichartz estimates for the inhomogeneous Tricomi equation with characteristic weight $(\varphi_m(t)^2-|x|^2)^\gamma t^\beta$, proved at the endpoints $q=q_0$ and $q=2$ via Fourier integral operators and complex interpolation; this extends the method of [11] and improves the authors' prior $L^2$ endpoint from $n\ge 3$ to all $n\ge 2$.

Load-bearing premise

The weighted Strichartz machinery rests on a pointwise decay bound for the homogeneous Tricomi equation that is quoted from the authors' earlier paper [17] (formula 2-20) and not reproved here; if that bound fails for part of the parameter range $n\ge 2$, $m>0$, $\alpha>-1$, the global existence proof collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Combining Theorem 1.1 with known blow-up results fixes the global-existence threshold for (1.7) as $p_{\mathrm{crit}}(n,\mu)$ across the whole range $n\ge 3$, $\mu\in(0,1)\cup(1,2)$.
  • Theorem 1.2 establishes global existence for the semilinear generalized Tricomi equation (1.17) for all $n\ge 2$ and $-1<\alpha\le m$, and Remark 1.4 notes that with the blow-up result of [35] the problem is closed in that range.
  • The weighted Strichartz estimates extend the admissible $\alpha$-range for the endpoint $q=q_0$ up to $\frac{n}{n-1}m$ and the $L^2$ endpoint to all $n\ge 2$, improvements that are needed to approach $p_{\mathrm{crit}}$ from above when $\mu\in(1,2)$.
  • For $n=1$ and $n=2$ the method does not cover the full interval (the paper cites separate results for those cases), but for $n\ge 3$ the threshold question is reduced to the shifted critical exponent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit is that their proof likely extends by continuity to $\mu=2$ and to effective-damping regimes, since the Tricomi reduction and the weighted Strichartz estimates are formulated for general $m>0$; testing this would require re-running the endpoint estimates at the limits $\alpha=-1$ and $\alpha=m+1$.
  • The product-weight idea $(\varphi_m(t)+|x|)^{\beta_1}(\varphi_m(t)-|x|)^{\beta_2}$ used for the $L^2$ endpoint is a portable tool for scale-invariant hyperbolic equations with characteristic cones; it could transfer to damped Klein-Gordon or wave equations with time-dependent mass.
  • A testable extension: the theorem's hypotheses require $p<p_{\mathrm{conf}}$; the proof's $\gamma$-range degenerates at $p_{\mathrm{conf}}$, but the authors do not discuss the conformal endpoint. Checking whether the weighted $L^{p+1}$ bound persists at $p=p_{\mathrm{conf}}$, or whether there is a genuine breakdown, would refine the threshold statement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the semilinear wave equation with scale-invariant damping (1.7) and proves global existence of small weak solutions for n≥3, μ∈(0,1)∪(1,2), and pcrit(n,μ)<p≤pconf(n,μ). The proof transforms the equation into a generalized Tricomi equation (1.17), establishes weighted Strichartz estimates for the linear inhomogeneous Tricomi equation (Theorem 1.3) at the endpoints q=q0 and q=2, and then applies a Picard contraction argument (Theorem 1.2). The main theorem is intended to match the conjectured critical exponent pcrit(n,μ) over this parameter range.

Significance. If fully substantiated, Theorem 1.1 would settle the global-existence side of the Strauss-type problem for this parameter range, complementing known blow-up results. The paper's main technical contribution is a set of weighted Strichartz estimates for the generalized Tricomi operator: the unweighted endpoint estimate (Lemma 2.3) improves [19, Lemma 2.2], and the L2 endpoint estimate (1.31) is proved for all n≥2, unlike the n≥3 restriction in [17]. The proof of the central weighted estimates is carried out in the paper rather than imported, and the final contraction argument is standard once the estimates are granted. However, a gap at α=0 in Lemma 2.3 and the absence of a proof of Theorem 1.4 leave the main theorem not fully established as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4] The statement of Lemma 2.3 includes α=0 (since the hypothesis is 0≤α≤n/(n−1)·m), but the proof only treats 0<α≤m((m+2)n+2)/(2(m+2)(n−1)) by invoking [19, Lemma 2.2] and then the regime m/4<β≤m/(2)·n/(n+1). Lemma 2.4 covers only −1<α<0. Thus α=0 is covered by neither lemma. This case is not vacuous: for n=3, μ=1.7, we have m=2(2−μ)/(μ−1)≈0.857, and p=1+m≈1.857 lies in (pcrit(3,1.7)≈1.835, pconf(3,1.7)≈2.081]; the transformation in Section 1.2 then gives α=1+m−p=0. The proof of (3.15) in Section 3.3 explicitly invokes Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4, so the endpoint q=q0 estimate is missing at these parameters. The limiting argument from β>m/4 cannot be used, since the bound t^{β−m/4}s^{β−m/4}≲|t−s|^{2β−m/2} used in Case I of the proof of Lemma 2.3 fails at β=0 when s≪|t−s|. I note that the proof of Lemma 2.4 appears to extend to α=0 after replacing 'β<0' by 'β≤0' in the inequalities around (2.30)–(2.34), so the gap is likely repairable locally, but the argument must be supplied in the revised version.
  2. [Section 1.4, Theorem 1.4] Theorem 1.4 is the key estimate used in the Picard iteration in Section 5 (see Eq. (5.3)), but it is stated without proof: the text says 'repeating the proof of Theorem 1.4 in [17] we can prove the following modified version'. Since Theorem 1.4 involves a different weight ((φ_m(t)+M)^2−|x|^2) and a different support condition (|x|≤φ_m(t)+M−1) than Theorem 1.3, and since [17] treats the α=0 case, the reduction is not automatic. The paper should either provide a full proof of Theorem 1.4 or give a precise description of the modifications needed to adapt the argument of [17] to the general-α setting. This is load-bearing because the contraction argument and the final global existence all rest on this estimate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, proof of Lemma 2.1] In the displayed inequality after (2.3), the right-hand side should contain A(f,g)^q rather than A(f,g), since the left-hand side is the q-th power of the weighted L^q norm.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, for example 'detials' in Section 3.4.3, 'estiamtes' in Section 1.4, and 'sem ilinear' in the abstract; these should be corrected in the final version.
  3. [Lemma 2.4 and its proof] The statement of Lemma 2.4 assumes −1<α<0, but several inequalities in its proof use only β≤0. Since the main text needs the α=0 case (see the major comment on Lemma 2.3), the authors should either extend the lemma to −1<α≤0 and adjust the phrase 'β<0' accordingly, or explain why the boundary case is obtained by a separate argument.
  4. [Section 3.4.1, proof of Claim 3.1] The condition α<mn/(n−1) used in the estimate after (3.28) is automatically satisfied for all α in the range α≤m since n≥2; this should be stated to avoid the impression that the endpoint of the α-range matters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the critical and conformal exponents are algebraic, the reduction to generalized Tricomi equations is explicit, and the central weighted Strichartz estimates are either proven in this paper or cited from independent prior work; self-citations are not definitions of the target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The main theorem's exponents pcrit and pconf are defined by explicit algebraic equations, not fitted to the solution or to any data. The proof reduces (1.7) to the generalized Tricomi problem (1.17) by explicit changes of variables: for 0<mu<1 with mu=m/(m+2) and alpha=m, and for 1<mu<2 with alpha=1+m-p, both transformations are written out in Section 1.2. The decisive analytic content is Theorem 1.3, a weighted inhomogeneous Strichartz estimate, which is proved in Sections 3 and 4 by endpoint estimates and complex interpolation; this proof is carried out inside the paper. Theorem 1.4 is obtained by repeating the proof of a theorem in the authors' earlier paper [17], but that is a citation to an independent published result, not a definition of the present conclusion. The Picard iteration in Section 5 uses Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 1.4; Lemma 2.1's homogeneous pointwise bound is quoted from [17, formula 2-20], again an external prior result with stated assumptions, not an object defined in terms of the target theorem. The low-alpha part of Lemma 2.3 is taken directly from [19, Lemma 2.2]; this is self-citation, but [19] is an independent preprint whose lemma is not equivalent to, or fitted to, the present existence theorem. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to force a choice. A genuine proof concern, flagged for the record rather than as circularity, is that Lemma 2.3 states the range 0 <= alpha <= n/(n-1) m but its proof splits into 0<alpha<=... and alpha>... with beta>m/4, so alpha=0 is not explicitly covered; alpha=0 can occur in the Theorem 1.1 range for mu in (1,2). That is a potential gap in the proof of Theorem 1.3 at an endpoint, not a circular reduction, and it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting and no new physical entities are involved. The proof rests on standard analytic tools plus imported estimates from the authors' previous work; the most delicate imported input is the homogeneous pointwise decay bound (2.3) from [17].

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Stein interpolation, Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev, and Littlewood-Paley inequalities hold in the stated mixed-norm settings.
    Used in Lemma 2.3, Section 3, and Section 4 to interpolate between endpoint estimates and to sum dyadic pieces.
  • domain assumption Initial data are smooth, compactly supported, n≥3, t≥1, μ∈(0,1)∪(1,2), and the support lies in a fixed ball of radius M.
    This is the Cauchy-data setting of problem (1.7) and the Tricomi problem (1.17).
  • domain assumption The pointwise decay estimate (2.3) for homogeneous generalized Tricomi solutions holds with the stated exponents and small δ>0.
    Lemma 2.1 uses this as its starting point; it is imported from Section 2 of the authors' prior paper [17].
  • domain assumption The inhomogeneous solution kernel satisfies the amplitude bounds (2.10) and the support-propagation property φ_m(t)−φ_m(s) ≥ |x−y| for (s,y) in supp F and (t,x) in supp w.
    Used in proofs of Lemma 2.3 and Section 4; taken from [19, (2.32)] and [17, Section 5B2].
  • domain assumption The blow-up threshold for p≤p_crit is known from Palmieri-Reissig [35] and related works.
    The paper's 'sharp' framing relies on these external blow-up results; they are not proved in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global existence for small amplitude semilinear wave equations with time-dependent scale-invariant damping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PIDDCHZH

@misc{pith2026250101670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global existence for small amplitude semilinear wave equations with time-dependent scale-invariant damping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PIDDCHZH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01670}
}
abstract

In this paper we prove a sharp global existence result for semilinear wave equations with time-dependent scale-invariant damping terms if the initial data is small. More specifically, we consider Cauchy problem of $\partial_t^2u-\Delta u+\frac{\mu}{t}\partial_tu=|u|^p$, where $n\ge 3$, $t\ge 1$ and $\mu\in(0,1)\cup(1,2)$. For critical exponent $p_{crit}(n,\mu)$ which is the positive root of $(n+\mu-1)p^2-(n+\mu+1)p-2=0$ and conformal exponent $p_{conf}(n,\mu)=\frac{n+\mu+3}{n+\mu-1}$, we establish global existence for $n\geq3$ and $p_{crit}(n,\mu)<p\leq p_{conf}(n,\mu)$. The proof is based on changing the wave equation into the semilinear generalized Tricomi equation $\partial_t^2u-t^m\Delta u=t^{\alpha(m)}|u|^p$, where $m=m(\mu)>0$ and $\alpha(m)\in\Bbb R$ are two suitable constants, then we investigate more general semilinear Tricomi equation $\partial_t^2v-t^m\Delta v=t^{\alpha}|v|^p$ and establish related weighted Strichartz estimates. Returning to the original wave equation, the corresponding global existence results on the small data solution $u$ can be obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Boundedness and decay of waves on spatially flat decelerated FLRW spacetimes

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A twisted vector-field method yields energy boundedness, local energy decay, r^p-weighted estimates, and energy and pointwise decay for waves on all spatially flat decelerated FLRW backgrounds with scale factor t^q, 0<q<1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    D. He, Q. Li, H. Yin, Global existence of small data weak solutions to the semilin ear wave equations with time-dependent scale-invariant damping , preprint, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [17]

    D. He, I. Witt, H. Yin, On the global solution problem of semilinear generalized Tr icomi equations, II, Pacific J. Math. 314 (2021), no. 1, 29–80

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    W. Chen, M. Reissig, On the critical exponent and sharp lifespan estimates for se milinear damped wave equations with data from Sobolev spaces of negat ive order, J. Evol. Equ. 23 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 13, 21 pp

    work page 2023

  4. [2]

    D’Abbicco, The threshold of effective damping for semilinear wave equa tions, Math

    M. D’Abbicco, The threshold of effective damping for semilinear wave equa tions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 38 (6) (2015), 1032–1045

    work page 2015

  5. [3]

    Semilinear damped wave equations with data from Sobolev spaces of negative order: the critical case in Euclidean setting and in the Heisenberg space

    M. D’Abbicco, Semilinear damped wave equations with data from Sobolev spa ces of negative order: the critical case in Euclidean setting and i n the Heisenberg space , arXiv:2408.11756

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [4]

    D’Abbicco, S

    M. D’Abbicco, S. Lucente, M. Reissig, Semilinear wave equations with effective damping , Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 34 (2013), 345–380

    work page 2013

  7. [5]

    D’Abbicco, S

    M. D’Abbicco, S. Lucente, NLWE with a special scale invariant damping in odd space di- mension, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 10th AIMS Conference. Suppl. , (2015), 312-319

    work page 2015

  8. [6]

    D’Abbicco, S

    M. D’Abbicco, S. Lucente, M. Reissig, A shift in the Strauss exponent for semilinear wave equations with a not effective damping , J. Differential Equations 259 (2015), 5040–5073

    work page 2015

Show all 56 references
  1. [7]

    M. R. Ebert, G. Girardi, M. Reissig, Critical regularity of nonlinearities in semilinear clas- sical damped wave equations, Math. Ann. 378 (2020), 1311-1326. 43

    2020

  2. [8]

    Fujita, On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy Problem for ut = ∆ u + u1+α, J

    H. Fujita, On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy Problem for ut = ∆ u + u1+α, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 13 (1966), 109–124

    1966

  3. [9]

    Fujiwara, M

    K. Fujiwara, M. Ikeda, Y . Wakasugi, Estimates of lifespan and blow-up rates for the wave equation with a time dependent damping and a power-type nonl inearity, Funkc. Ekvacioj 62 (2) (2019), 157–189

    2019

  4. [10]

    Galstian, Global existence for the one-dimensional second order semi linear hyperbolic equations, J

    A. Galstian, Global existence for the one-dimensional second order semi linear hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 344 (1) (2008), 76–98

    2008

  5. [11]

    Georgiev, H

    V . Georgiev, H. Lindblad, C. D. Sogge, Weighted Strichartz estimates and global existence for semi-linear wave equations , Amer. J. Math. 119 (1997), 1291–1319

    1997

  6. [12]

    R. T. Glassey, Finite-time blow-up for solutions of nonlinear wave equati ons, Math. Z. 177 (1981), 323–340

    1981

  7. [13]

    R. T. Glassey, Existence in the large for □ u =F(u) in two space dimensions , Math. Z. 178 (1981), 233–261

    1981

  8. [14]

    D. He, I. Witt, H. Yin, On the global solution problem for semilinear generalized T ricomi equations, I, Calc. V ar. Partial Differential Equations56 (2017), no. 2, Paper No. 21, 24 pp

    2017

  9. [15]

    D. He, I. Witt, H. Yin, On semilinear Tricomi equations with critical exponents or in two space dimensions, J. Differential Equations 263 (2017), no. 12, 8102–8137

    2017

  10. [16]

    D. He, I. Witt, H. Yin, On the Strauss index of semilinear Tricomi equation , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 19 (2020), no. 10, 4817–4838

    2020

  11. [18]

    D. He, I. Witt, H. Yin, Finite time blowup for the 1-D semilinear generalized Trico mi equa- tion with subcritical or critical exponents , Methods Appl. Anal. 28 (2021), no. 3, 313–324

    2021

  12. [20]

    Ikeda, M

    M. Ikeda, M. Sobajima, Life-span of solutions to semilinear wave equation with tim e- dependent critical damping for specially localized initia l data, Math. Ann. 372 (3-4) (2018), 1017–1040

    2018

  13. [21]

    John, Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three sp ace dimensions , Manuscripta Math

    F. John, Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three sp ace dimensions , Manuscripta Math. 28 (1979), 235–265

    1979

  14. [22]

    M. Kato, M. Sakuraba, Global existence and blow-up for semilinear damped wave equ ations in three space dimensions, Nonlinear Anal. 182 (2019), 209–225

    2019

  15. [23]

    C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce, L. V ega, Well-posedness and scattering results for the general- ized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction princi ple, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 46 (1993), 527–620. 44

    1993

  16. [24]

    N. Lai, H. Takamura, Blow-up for semilinear damped wave equations with subcriti cal expo- nent in the scattering case , Nonlinear Anal. 168 (2018), 222–237

    2018

  17. [25]

    N. Lai, H. Takamura, K. Wakasa, Blow-up for semilinear wave equations with the scale in- variant damping and super-Fujita exponent , J. Differential Equations 263 (9) (2017), 5377– 5394

    2017

  18. [26]

    N. Lai, Y . Zhou, Global existence for semilinear wave equations with scaling invariant damp- ing in 3-D, Nonlinear Anal. 210 (2021), Paper No. 112392, 12 pp

    2021

  19. [27]

    Q. Li, H. Yin, Global weighted space-time estimates of small data weak sol utions to 1-D semilinear wave equations with scaling invariant dampings , Preprint, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Q. Li, H. Yin, Global weighted space-time estimates of small data weak sol utions to 2-D semilinear wave equations with scaling invariant dampings , Preprint, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    T. Li, Y . Zhou, Breakdown of solutions to □ u + ut = |u|1+α, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Systems Ser. A 1 (4) (1995), 503-520

    1995

  22. [30]

    J. Lin, K. Nishihara, J. Zhai, Critical exponent for the semilinear wave equation with tim e- dependent damping, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 32 (2012), 4307–4320

    2012

  23. [31]

    Lindblad, C

    H. Lindblad, C. D. Sogge, On existence and scattering with minimal regularity for semilinear wave equations, J. Funct. Anal. 130 (1995), 357–426

    1995

  24. [32]

    M. Liu, C. Wang, Global existence for semilinear damped wave equations in re lation with the Strauss conjecture, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 40 (2) (2020), 709–724

    2020

  25. [33]

    Nishihara, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the semilinear wave equ ation with time- dependent damping, Tokyo J

    K. Nishihara, Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the semilinear wave equ ation with time- dependent damping, Tokyo J. Math. 34 (2) (2011), 327–343

    2011

  26. [34]

    Palmieri, A global existence result for a semilinear scale-invariant wave equation in even dimension, Math

    A. Palmieri, A global existence result for a semilinear scale-invariant wave equation in even dimension, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42 (8) (2019), 2680–2706

    2019

  27. [35]

    Palmieri, M

    A. Palmieri, M. Reissig, A competition between Fujita and Strauss type exponents for blow- up of semi-linear wave equations with scale-invariant damp ing and mass , J. Differential Equations 266 (2-3) (2019), 1176–1220

    2019

  28. [36]

    Z. Ruan, I. Witt, H. Yin, The existence and singularity structures of low regularity solutions to higher order degenerate hyperbolic equations , J. Differential Equations 256 (2014), 407– 460

    2014

  29. [37]

    Z. Ruan, I. Witt, H. Yin, On the existence and cusp singularity of solutions to semili near generalized Tricomi equations with discontinuous initial data, Commun. Contemp. Math., 17 (2015), 1450028 (49 pages)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Z. Ruan, I. Witt, H. Yin, On the existence of low regularity solutions to semilinear g en- eralized Tricomi equations in mixed type domains , J. Differential Equations 259 (2015), 7406–7462. 45

    2015

  31. [39]

    Z. Ruan, I. Witt, H. Yin, Minimal regularity solutions of semilinear generalized Tr icomi equations, Pacific J. Math. 296 (2018), no. 1, 181–226

    2018

  32. [40]

    Schaeffer, The equation □ u = |u|p for the critical value of p, Proc

    J. Schaeffer, The equation □ u = |u|p for the critical value of p, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 101 (1985), 31–44

    1985

  33. [41]

    Sideris, Nonexistence of global solutions to semilinear wave equations in high dimensions, J

    T. Sideris, Nonexistence of global solutions to semilinear wave equations in high dimensions, J. Differential Equations 52 (1984), 378–406

    1984

  34. [42]

    E. M. Stein, Intepolation of linear operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1956), 482-492

    1956

  35. [43]

    Strauss, Nonlinear scattering theory at low energy , J

    W. Strauss, Nonlinear scattering theory at low energy , J. Funct. Anal. 41 (1981), 110–133

    1981

  36. [44]

    Todorova, B

    G. Todorova, B. T. Y ordanov,Critical exponent for a nonlinear wave equation with damping, J. Differential Equations 174 (2) (2001), 464–489

    2001

  37. [45]

    Z. Tu, J. Lin, A note on the blowup of scale invariant damping wave equation with sub- Strauss exponent, arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.00866, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Z. Tu, J. Lin, Life-span of semilinear wave equations with scale-invaria nt damping: critical Strauss exponent case, Differential Integral Equations 32 (2019), no. 5-6, 249–264

    2019

  39. [47]

    Wakasugi, Critical exponent for the semilinear wave equation with sca le invariant damp- ing, in: F ourier Analysis, Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2014, pp

    Y . Wakasugi, Critical exponent for the semilinear wave equation with sca le invariant damp- ing, in: F ourier Analysis, Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2014, pp. 375–390

    2014

  40. [48]

    Wakasugi, On the diffusive structure for the damped wave equation with variable coeffi- cients (Doctoral dissertation), Doctoral thesis, Osaka Universi ty, 2014

    Y . Wakasugi, On the diffusive structure for the damped wave equation with variable coeffi- cients (Doctoral dissertation), Doctoral thesis, Osaka Universi ty, 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    Wakasa, B

    K. Wakasa, B. T. Y ordanov, On the nonexistence of global solutions for critical semili near wave equations with damping in the scattering case , Nonlinear Anal. 180 (2019), 67–74

    2019

  42. [50]

    Wang, Recent progress on the Strauss conjecture and related probl ems, Mathematica 48 (2018), no

    C. Wang, Recent progress on the Strauss conjecture and related probl ems, Mathematica 48 (2018), no. 1, 111–130

    2018

  43. [51]

    Wirth, Wave equations with time-dependent dissipation

    J. Wirth, Wave equations with time-dependent dissipation. I. Non-ef fective dissipation, J. Differential Equations 222 (2006), no. 2, 487–514

    2006

  44. [52]

    Wirth, Wave equations with time-dependent dissipation

    J. Wirth, Wave equations with time-dependent dissipation. II. Effec tive dissipation, J. Differ- ential Equations 232 (2007), no. 1, 74–103

    2007

  45. [53]

    Y agdjian, Global existence for the n-dimensional semilinear Tricomi -type equations , Comm

    K. Y agdjian, Global existence for the n-dimensional semilinear Tricomi -type equations , Comm. Partial Diff. Equations 31 (2006), 907–944

    2006

  46. [54]

    Y agdjian, The self-similar solutions of the Tricomi-type equations , Z

    K. Y agdjian, The self-similar solutions of the Tricomi-type equations , Z. angew. Math. Phys. 58 (2007), 612–645

    2007

  47. [55]

    Y ordanov, Q

    B. Y ordanov, Q. S. Zhang, Finite time blow up for critical wave equations in high dimensions, J. Funct. Anal. 231 (2006), 361–374

    2006

  48. [56]

    Q. S. Zhang, A blow-up result for a nonlinear wave equation with damping: the critical case, C. R. Acad. Sci., S´ er.1 Math. 333 (2) (2001), 109–114

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.