Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

OptiBench Meets ReSocratic: Measure and Improve LLMs for Optimization Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09887 v4 pith:PMFXFXIB submitted 2024-07-13 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords llmsoptimizationdatamodelsopen-sourceoptibenchproblemsresocratic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited their problem-solving abilities in mathematical reasoning. Solving realistic optimization (OPT) problems in application scenarios requires advanced and applied mathematics ability. However, current OPT benchmarks that merely solve linear programming are far from complex realistic situations. In this work, we propose OptiBench, a benchmark for End-to-end optimization problem-solving with human-readable inputs and outputs. OptiBench contains rich optimization problems, including linear and nonlinear programming with or without tabular data, which can comprehensively evaluate LLMs' solving ability. In our benchmark, LLMs are required to call a code solver to provide precise numerical answers. Furthermore, to alleviate the data scarcity for optimization problems, and to bridge the gap between open-source LLMs on a small scale (e.g., Llama-3-8b) and closed-source LLMs (e.g., GPT-4), we further propose a data synthesis method namely ReSocratic. Unlike general data synthesis methods that proceed from questions to answers, \ReSocratic first incrementally synthesizes formatted optimization demonstration with mathematical formulations step by step and then back-translates the generated demonstrations into questions. Based on this, we synthesize the ReSocratic-29k dataset. We further conduct supervised fine-tuning with ReSocratic-29k on multiple open-source models. Experimental results show that ReSocratic-29k significantly improves the performance of open-source models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Falsification-Based Verification of LLM-Generated Optimization Models: Sound Test Batteries and Their Detection Limits

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A sound, threshold-free battery of optimization-theoretic tests can catch unfaithful LLM-generated MILP models while never flagging faithful ones, and provably cannot catch certain error classes.

  2. PEARL: Solver-in-the-Loop Interactive Optimization Modeling from Natural Language

    cs.AI 2026-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Training an LLM as a multi-turn agent that runs and repairs solver code raises verified optimization solve rates, with the 4B PEARL model outperforming DeepSeek-V3.2-685B in aggregate.

  3. Search Hardness-Aware LLM-Based Problem Formulation for Expensive Simulation-Driven Design

    cs.NE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SHA-PF uses initial simulation data to select a 'hard but promising' anchor satisfaction state and evolves LLM-generated formulations that prioritize it, reaching target designs with fewer expensive simulations on ant...

  4. Uncertainty-Aware Simulation-Based Inference for Operations Research with Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Lookahead resampling with entropy- and power-based rewards steers LLM decoding toward OR formulations whose short simulated continuations are most concentrated, giving reported pass@1 gains not yet separated from adde...

  5. A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving

    cs.NE 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature survey that classifies LLM-based optimization research into modeling and solving, with solving divided into LLMs as optimizers, low-level components, and high-level managers.

Pith tools