REVIEW 2 cited by
Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has recently witnessed a transformative shift with the emergence of foundation models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) that have revolutionized text-based NLP. This paradigm has extended to other modalities, including speech, where researchers are actively exploring the combination of Speech Foundation Models (SFMs) and LLMs into single, unified models capable of addressing multimodal tasks. Among such tasks, this paper focuses on speech-to-text translation (ST). By examining the published papers on the topic, we propose a unified view of the architectural solutions and training strategies presented so far, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Based on this examination, we not only organize the lessons learned but also show how diverse settings and evaluation approaches hinder the identification of the best-performing solution for each architectural building block and training choice. Lastly, we outline recommendations for future works on the topic aimed at better understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the SFM+LLM solutions for ST.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice
An end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation model with voice cloning, trained with a two-stage reinforcement learning reward scheme, reports high accuracy and low latency on the authors' RealSI benchmark.
-
Different Speech Translation Models Encode and Translate Speaker Gender Differently
Traditional encoder-decoder speech translation models encode speaker gender in hidden states, while newer adapter-based models largely do not; lower gender encoding tracks with masculine-default translation bias.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.