REVIEW 1 cited by
A Nearly Similar Powerful Test for Mediation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper derives a new powerful test for mediation that is easy to use. Testing for mediation is empirically very important in psychology, sociology, medicine, economics and business, generating over 100,000 citations to a single key paper. The no-mediation hypothesis $H_{0}:\theta_{1}\theta _{2}=0$ also poses a theoretically interesting statistical problem since it defines a manifold that is non-regular in the origin where rejection probabilities of standard tests are extremely low. We prove that a similar test for mediation only exists if the size is the reciprocal of an integer. It is unique, but has objectionable properties. We propose a new test that is nearly similar with power close to the envelope without these abject properties and is easy to use in practice. Construction uses the general varying $g$-method that we propose. We illustrate the results in an educational setting with gender role beliefs and in a trade union sentiment application.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Conformalized Lee Inference: Distribution-Free Individual Treatment Effect Intervals under Monotone Sample Selection
Under monotone sample selection, calibrating conformal scores at the (1−απ) treated-selected quantile yields finite-sample, minimax-valid prediction intervals for always-selected counterfactuals and ITEs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.