Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Nearly Similar Powerful Test for Mediation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.11342 v2 pith:PPL5CSHS submitted 2020-12-21 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords mediationtestsimilareasynearlypowerfulpropertiespropose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper derives a new powerful test for mediation that is easy to use. Testing for mediation is empirically very important in psychology, sociology, medicine, economics and business, generating over 100,000 citations to a single key paper. The no-mediation hypothesis $H_{0}:\theta_{1}\theta _{2}=0$ also poses a theoretically interesting statistical problem since it defines a manifold that is non-regular in the origin where rejection probabilities of standard tests are extremely low. We prove that a similar test for mediation only exists if the size is the reciprocal of an integer. It is unique, but has objectionable properties. We propose a new test that is nearly similar with power close to the envelope without these abject properties and is easy to use in practice. Construction uses the general varying $g$-method that we propose. We illustrate the results in an educational setting with gender role beliefs and in a trade union sentiment application.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conformalized Lee Inference: Distribution-Free Individual Treatment Effect Intervals under Monotone Sample Selection

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under monotone sample selection, calibrating conformal scores at the (1−απ) treated-selected quantile yields finite-sample, minimax-valid prediction intervals for always-selected counterfactuals and ITEs.

Pith tools